Blood pressure responses to mental stress in emotionally defensive patients with stable coronary artery disease

High responsivity to threat during the initial stage of perception in repression: a 3 T fMRI study

Repression designates coping strategies such as avoidance, or denial that aim to shield the organism from threatening stimuli. Derakshan et al. have proposed the vigilance-avoidance theory of repressive coping. It is assumed that repressors have an initial rapid vigilant response triggering physiological responses to threat stimuli. In the following second stage repressors manifest avoidant cognitive biases. Functional magnetic resonance imaging at 3T was used to study neural correlates of repressive coping during the first stages of perception of threat. Pictures of human faces bearing fearful, angry, happy and neutral expressions were briefly presented masked by neutral faces. Forty study participants (20 repressive and 20 sensitizing individuals) were selected from a sample of 150 female students on the basis of their scores on the Mainz Coping Inventory. Repressors exhibited stronger neural activation than sensitizers primarily in response to masked threatening faces (vs neutral baseline) in the frontal, parietal and temporal cortex as well as in the cingulate gyrus, basal ganglia and insula. There was no brain region in which sensitizers showed increased activation to emotion expression compared to repressors. The present results are in line with the vigilance-avoidance theory which predicts heightened automatic responsivity to threatening stimuli in repression.

Physiological stress responses in defensive individuals: age and sex matter

The association between defensiveness and physiological responses to stress were evaluated in 81 healthy working men and 118 women, aged 20 to 64 years (M=41; SD=11.45). Participants underwent laboratory testing during which they were exposed to interpersonal stressors. Heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), blood pressure (BP), and salivary cortisol were measured. Defensiveness was evaluated using the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. In women, higher defensiveness was associated with greater BP and HR reactivity to stress (p<.05). In older men, lower defensiveness was associated with increased systolic BP reactivity to stress (p<.02), delayed HRV recovery (p<.02), and greater salivary cortisol levels (p<.02). In conclusion, greater defensiveness was associated with increased reactivity to stress in women whereas in older men, lower defensiveness was associated with elevated cardiovascular, autonomic, and endocrine responses to stress.

Stress responses and baroreflex function in coronary disease

Exaggerated pressor responses to mental stress in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are associated with increased risk for subsequent cardiovascular events. The integrated baroreflex gain and its mechanical and neural component were estimated and then related to the blood pressure and heart rate responses to simulated real-life stressors: mental arithmetic and public speaking. Eighteen healthy individuals (aged 61 +/- 8 yr) and 29 individuals with documented CAD but no other comorbidities (aged 59 +/- 8 yr) were studied. Heart rate and blood pressures were continuously assessed before, during preparation for, and during performance of a math task and a speech task. The assessment of beat-to-beat carotid diameters during baroreflex engagement was used to estimate the integrated baroreflex gain and its mechanical and neural component. The CAD subjects demonstrated significantly greater increases in heart rate and blood pressures for the performance of the speech task. However, there were no group differences in integrated cardiovagal baroreflex gain or either mechanical or neural baroreflex component. These findings indicate that the augmented pressor responses in CAD do not result from a generalized arterial baroreflex deficit.

Repressive/defensive coping, blood pressure, and cardiovascular rehabilitation

The emotional style of repressive coping in relation to blood pressure and cardiovascular disease has received increasing attention during the past 25 years. Repressive coping describes the capacity to render events and feelings inaccessible to consciousness. Intrapsychic conflicts involving unacceptable wishes, fantasies, and impulses can be hidden from conscious awareness. Repressive (or defensive) coping has been associated with elevated blood pressure levels, essential hypertension, and paroxysmal hypertension. Cardiovascular patients who use a repressive style have shown mixed results during recuperation. The repressive coping style is easily assessed with two pencil-and-paper measures, which clinicians could administer. Knowledge that a patient uses repressive emotional coping could help physicians better treat this unique group. For patients recovering from cardiovascular events, intervention styles can be adopted that fit the repressive personality. More research in this area will be a challenge to psychologists and internal medicine specialists.

Talking effect and "white coat" effect in hypertensive patients: physical effort or emotional content?

Talking has been shown to increase blood pressure instantaneously in hypertensive patients and to contribute to the white coat effect. The effects of talking were compared with those of counting aloud in 64 patients with essential hypertension who were randomly assigned to a period of stress talking and a period of counting aloud (active periods), alternating with three periods of silence (control). The same monitor was used for office measurements and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure analysis. Systolic/diastolic blood pressures increased significantly more during talking (163/110 mmHg) than during counting aloud (152/102 mmHg, both p < .0001) in both treated and untreated patients and in sustained and clinical hypertension. Talking had a residual effect on systolic blood pressure that lasted 5.8 +/- 0.1 minutes. The emotional content seemed to be the only cause of the talking effect. Its instantaneous and residual effects on blood pressure and heart rate should be considered when measuring these variables.

The somatic symptom paradox in DSM-IV anxiety disorders: suggestions for a clinical focus in psychophysiology

Although DSM-IV criteria for anxiety disorders include physiological symptoms, these symptoms are evaluated exclusively by verbal report. The current review explores the background for this paradox and tries to demonstrate on theoretical and empirical grounds how it could be resolved, providing new insights about the role of psychophysiological measures in the clinic. The three-systems approach to evaluating anxiety argues that somatic measures as well as verbal and behavioral ones are indispensable. However, the low concordance between these domains of measurement impugns their reliability and validity. We argue that concordance can be improved by examining the relationship of variables less global than anxiety and by restriction to specific anxiety disorders. For example, recent evidence from our and other laboratories indicate a prominent role of self-reported and physiologically measured breathing irregularities in panic disorder. Nonetheless, even within a diagnosis, anxiety patients vary radically in which somatic variables are deviant. Thus, in clinical practice, individual profiles of psychological and physiological anxiety responses may be essential to indicate distinct therapeutic approaches and ways of tracking improvement. Laboratory provocations specific to certain anxiety disorders and advances in ambulatory monitoring vastly expand the scope of self-report and physiological measurement and will likely contribute to a refined assessment of anxiety disorders.

Cardiovascular recovery from acute laboratory stress: reliability and concurrent validity

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the value of laboratory measures of cardiovascular recovery across four criteria: reliability across multiple tasks, reliability across a 3-year time interval, ability to predict daily ambulatory blood pressure, and interrelationships with coronary risk factors and psychosocial variables.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-nine healthy adults (mean age = 27.1 years) completed a two-part protocol consisting of 1 day of laboratory testing and 1 day of ambulatory monitoring. The laboratory protocol included a 15-minute baseline assessment followed by three 5-minute laboratory challenges (mental arithmetic, speech, and handgrip). Five-minute recovery periods followed each exercise. One hundred twenty-five participants returned after 3 years to repeat the protocol.

RESULTS

When aggregated across tasks, cardiovascular recovery showed acceptable levels of internal consistency (alpha values = 0.7) and proved relatively stable across time (r values = 0.22-0.35). Recovery values statistically improved the prediction of daily ambulatory readings above baseline and stress reactivity laboratory values (p values < .001) but were largely unrelated to coronary risk factors or psychosocial measures.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that cardiovascular recovery from acute laboratory stress can be treated as a stable individual difference variable that can -improve standard laboratory-based predictor models of ambulatory readings.

Defensiveness status predicts 3-year incidence of hypertension

OBJECTIVE

A growing body of research indicates that defensive personality styles (in particular, self-deception) may be related to higher resting blood pressure and stress reactivity levels. This study is the first, however, to examine the value of defensiveness as a prognostic indicator for the development of clinical hypertension.

METHODS

Participants were 127 initially normotensive male and female adults who completed a comprehensive protocol including psychological testing, assessment of smoking, physical activity and body fat levels, and 8-12 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Participants returned 3-years later for an identical follow-up protocol. Defensiveness was assessed using the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding.

RESULTS

At 3-year testing, 15 of 127 participants (12%) met criteria for hypertension (i.e. ambulatory mean blood pressure > 140/90). Comparisons between defensiveness groups showed that 12 of 60 (20%) high defensiveness participants met hypertension criteria, whereas only three of 67 (4.5%) low defensiveness participants were hypertensive. Logistic regression equations adjusted for age, alcohol usage, bodyfat, self-reported exercise levels, smoking, and year-1 ambulatory blood pressure, revealed that membership in the high defensiveness group was associated with more than a sevenfold risk of 3-year hypertension (adjusted risk ratio, 7.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-39.2).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings link defensive characteristics to an increased prospective risk of hypertension using state of the art ambulatory monitoring techniques, and were robust after controlling for established risk factors. We conclude that the current results add to the hypertension literature by demonstrating associations between personality and clinically relevant blood pressure criteria.