Low-density lipoprotein receptor genotype-dependent response to cholesterol lowering by combined pravastatin and cholestyramine in familial hypercholesterolemia

Influence of the LDL-receptor genotype on statin response in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: insights from the Canadian FH Registry

BACKGROUND

Whether LDL receptor (LDLR) residual activity influences the LDL-lowering effect of statins in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) remains unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the LDLR genotype and statin-induced LDL-C reductions in HeFH.

METHODS

A total of 615 individuals with HeFH (receptor defective (RD) genotype, n=226; receptor negative (RN) genotype, n=389) from 7 lipid clinics across Canada who initiated statin monotherapy were included in this retrospective longitudinal study. Statin-induced reductions in LDL-C among individuals with RD and RN genotypes were compared using linear models.

RESULTS

There were 334 women and 281 men with a mean untreated LDL-C concentrations of 6.97 ± 1.65 mmol/L. Untreated and on-statin LDL-C levels where higher among patients with a RN genotype [Untreated: RN: 7.24 (95% CI: 6.98, 7.50) mmol/L vs. RD: 6.70 (95% CI: 6.41, 6.98) mmol/L; P=0.0002; on-statin: RN: 4.50 (95% CI: 4.31, 4.70) vs. RD: 4.05 (95% CI: 3.84, 4.26) mmol/L; P=0.0004)]. After adjustments for age, sex, smoking status, untreated LDL-C concentrations and statin type and dose as well as the clinic where the patients were treated, the LDL-C lowering effect of statins was significantly weaker for individuals with a RN mutation compared with individuals with a RD mutation [RN: -31.1% (95% CI: (-34.7, -27.4) vs. RD: -36.5% (95% CI: -40.4, -32.6); P<0.0001]. The LDLR genotype was the strongest non-modifiable independent correlate of statin-induced LDL-C reductions (R²=2.3%; P=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The LDLR genotype is significantly associated with statin-induced reductions in LDL-C concentrations in HeFH.

Pharmacogenomics Variability of Lipid-Lowering Therapies in Familial Hypercholesterolemia

The exponential expansion of genomic data coupled with the lack of appropriate clinical categorization of the variants is posing a major challenge to conventional medications for many common and rare diseases. To narrow this gap and achieve the goals of personalized medicine, a collaborative effort should be made to characterize the genomic variants functionally and clinically with a massive global genomic sequencing of "healthy" subjects from several ethnicities. Familial-based clustered diseases with homogenous genetic backgrounds are amongst the most beneficial tools to help address this challenge. This review will discuss the diagnosis, management, and clinical monitoring of familial hypercholesterolemia patients from a wide angle to cover both the genetic mutations underlying the phenotype, and the pharmacogenomic traits unveiled by the conventional and novel therapeutic approaches. Achieving a drug-related interactive genomic map will potentially benefit populations at risk across the globe who suffer from dyslipidemia.

Hypolipidemic treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a lifelong challenge

In familial hypercholesterolemia, a defect in low-density lipoprotein receptors causes lifelong two- to threefold elevations in serum low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels. This leads to early atherosclerotic changes in infancy. Lifelong hypolipidemic treatment that can be started at a young age is thus greatly needed. Early diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia is important, and improved DNA tests for low-density lipoprotein receptor mutations have made it possible to carry out diagnosis at birth. A low saturated-fat, low cholesterol diet can be safely started at 7 months of age. This can be accompanied by dietary stanol esters from 2 years of age. At the age of 10, statin treatment can be safely started. In adults, more aggressive hypolipidemic treatment is required in order to reach the treatment goal for serum low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels less than 2.5 mmol/l. This can be achieved by using high doses of statin, or preferably by combining a statin with resin or ezetimibe (Zeita), Merck and Shering-Plough Pharmaceuticals). Once started, treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia is lifelong.

Pharmacogenomics of lipid-lowering therapies

Statins are the most widely used group of lipid-lowering drugs and they have been shown to be effective in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, primarily by reducing plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations and possibly through other pleiotropic effects. However, there are large variations in lipid responses to statins and some patients have intolerable muscle adverse drug reactions, which may in part be related to genetic factors. In the last decade, pharmacogenetic studies on statins ranging from the candidate gene approach to the more recent genome-wide association studies have provided evidence that genetic variations play an important role in determining statin responses. This review summarizes the current understanding on the pharmacogenomics of statins and other lipid-lowering drugs in current use.

Effect of ezetimibe coadministered with statins in genotype-confirmed heterozygous FH patients

We investigated the effect of statins and statins plus ezetimibe in 65 FH heterozygotes carrying LDLR-defective or LDLR-negative mutations as well as the effect of ezetimibe monotherapy in 50 hypercholesterolemic (HCH) patients intolerant to statins. PCSK9 and NPC1L1 genes were analysed to assess the role of genetic variants in response to therapy. In FH patients combined therapy reduced LDL-C by 57%, irrespective of the type of LDLR mutation. The additional decrease of plasma LDL-C induced by ezetimibe showed wide inter-individual variability (from -39% to -4.7%) and was negatively correlated with percent LDL-C decrease due to statin alone (r=-0.713, P<0.001). The variable response to statins was not due to PCSK9 gene variants associated with statin hyper-sensitivity. The highest response to ezetimibe was observed in a carrier of R174H substitution in NPC1L1, which had been found to be associated with high cholesterol absorption. In HCH patients, ezetimibe monotherapy induced a variable decrease of plasma LDL-C (from -47.7% to -13.4%). To investigate this variability, we sequenced NPC1L1 gene in patients with the highest and the lowest response to ezetimibe. This analysis showed a higher prevalence of the G allele of the c.816 C>G polymorphism (L272L) in hyper-responders, an observation confirmed also in FH patients hyper-responders to ezetimibe. In both FH and HCH patients, the G allele carriers tended to have a higher LDL-C reduction in response to ezetimibe. These observations suggest that in FH heterozygotes LDL-C reduction following combined therapy reflects a complex interplay between hepatic synthesis and intestinal absorption of cholesterol.

Low-density lipoprotein receptor genotype and response to pravastatin in children with familial hypercholesterolemia: substudy of an intima-media thickness trial

BACKGROUND

The lipid-lowering effects of statin therapy show considerable interindividual variation in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Whether the type of LDL receptor mutation predicts the response to statin treatment is not yet established. We analyzed the relationship between LDL receptor genotype and response to pravastatin treatment in children with FH using carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) to measure efficacy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 2-year trial with pravastatin, 193 children had genetically confirmed FH and were included in the present substudy. At baseline, children with null alleles had higher LDL cholesterol levels (difference, 0.94+/-0.19 mmol/L [SEM]; P<0.001) and a greater carotid IMT (difference, 0.019+/-0.01 mm; P=0.02) compared with children with receptor-defective mutations. The decrease in carotid IMT during the trial was not significantly different in children with null alleles and receptor-defective mutations (0.018+/-0.012 and 0.012+/-0.010 mm; 2-way ANCOVA, P=0.7). After 2 years of treatment, the children with null alleles continued to have greater carotid IMT than children with receptor-defective mutations (difference, 0.016+/-0.01 mm; P=0.02). LDL cholesterol lowering tended to be less in carriers of null alleles compared with carriers of receptor-defective mutations (1.30+/-0.25 and 1.85+/-0.20 mmol/L; 2-way ANCOVA, P=0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

In FH children, we found that the null allele genotype was associated with a greater carotid IMT, higher LDL cholesterol levels, and a nonsignificant tendency to attenuated LDL cholesterol lowering compared with receptor-defective mutations. Null alleles identify FH patients at the highest cardiovascular disease risk who may benefit from more aggressive treatment started in childhood.

Pharmacogenetics of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: exploring the potential for genotype-based individualization of coronary heart disease management

Despite the benefit of statin therapy in the prevention of coronary heart disease, a considerable inter-individual variation exists in its response. It is well recognized that genetic variation can contribute to differences in drug disposition and, consequently, clinical efficacy at the population level. Pharmacogenetics, exploring genetic polymorphisms that influence response to drug therapy, may one day allow the clinician to customize treatment strategies for patients in order to improve the success rate of drug therapies. To date, 41 studies have investigated the relationships between common genetic variants and response to statin therapy in terms of lipid effects and clinical outcomes; 16 candidate genes involved in lipoprotein metabolism and 3 in pharmacokinetics. APOE is the most extensively studied locus, and absolute difference in LDL cholesterol reduction across genotypes remained 3-6%. Moreover, none of the associations was striking enough to justify genetic analysis in clinical practice. Reported data have suggested that larger studies (>1000 participants) or combination analyses with >2 different polymorphisms would enable us to find clinically or biologically meaningful difference, which could be assumed as >10% absolute difference, and that genes influencing cholesterol biosynthesis in the liver, such as ABCG5/G8, CYP7A1, HMGCR, would be good candidates for future studies.

Pharmacogenetics of lipid diseases

The genetic basis for most of the rare lipid monogenic disorders have been elucidated, but the challenge remains in determining the combination of genes that contribute to the genetic variability in lipid levels in the general population; this has been estimated to be in the range of 40-60 per cent of the total variability. Therefore, the effect of common polymorphisms on lipid phenotypes will be greatly modulated by gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. This approach can also be used to characterise the individuality of the response to lipid-lowering therapies, whether using drugs (pharmacogenetics) or dietary interventions (nutrigenetics). In this regard, multiple studies have already described significant interactions between candidate genes for lipid and drug metabolism that modulate therapeutic response--although the outcomes of these studies have been controversial and call for more rigorous experimental design and analytical approaches. Once solid evidence about the predictive value of genetic panels is obtained, risk and therapeutic algorithms can begin to be generated that should provide an accurate measure of genetic predisposition, as well as targeted behavioural modifications or drugs of choice and personalised dosages of these drugs.

Effect of pretreatment vitamin D levels on in vivo effects of atorvastatin on bone metabolism in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

To find the clinical variables associated with atorvastatin's effects on bone metabolism markers, 35 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia were treated with atorvastatin for 24 weeks, and the levels of bone formation markers (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin) and resorption marker (urine collagen type-1 cross-linked N-telopeptide) were determined. Pretreatment vitamin D levels showed significant and positive associations with changes in 2 bone formation markers. The serial changes in 3 markers were favorable-increased bone formation markers and unchanged bone resorption marker-but the changes occurred only in patients with pretreatment vitamin D levels >50 pg/ml.

DNA testing for familial hypercholesterolemia: improving disease recognition and patient care

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide and, like most chronic diseases, it has major genetic and environmental components. Among patients with coronary heart disease onset before the age of 55, about 5% of cases are attributable to heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a disease following autosomal dominant inheritance. About 50% of individuals with FH die before the age of 60 due to myocardial infarction. The frequency of FH is estimated to be 1 : 500. FH is related to mutations in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol LDL-receptor gene and apolipoprotein B (apoB) gene. The identification of individuals with FH has been based on lipid levels and segregation of lipid levels within the family. However, phenotypes are overlapping and family history is not always informative. Therefore, a DNA-based genetic test for FH appears to offer the best alternative. The DNA test gives a simple yes/no answer. The FH test is a definitive tool for the identification of affected family members. The approach of targeted family genetic screening to find new patients is faster and more reliable compared with a biochemical form of screening. Early identification and efficient treatment of such patients is important and highly cost effective. There is evidence to suggest that the nature of the LDL-receptor (LDLR) mutation influences the degree of cholesterol lowering achieved by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins). The observed differences in the LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) responses to these drugs among the various LDLR gene mutations are not yet completely understood. The relationships shown between LDLR mutation types and lipid levels, and the response of lipid levels to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor treatment, will have to be investigated within the framework of pharmacogenetic studies. The variables, which are important in determining the overall atherosclerosis risk, are the result of combined activity in a dynamic network of numerous genes and environment. Candidate genes for atherosclerosis need to be further tested and validated. Future research should be directed at determining the significance of such targets, which patients with FH are at particularly high risk of premature cardiovascular disease, and which environmental factors are effective in modulating this risk. Genetics-based diagnostics will complement identification of FH while improving cardiovascular risk prediction, prevention of disease and treatment efficacy.

LDL-receptor gene mutations and the hypocholesterolemic response to statin therapy

Studies of the cholesterol lowering effect of statin therapy as a function of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-receptor mutation type have not produced a clear picture, possibly because they included patients with several different kinds of LDL-receptor mutations. We studied the response to treatment with fluvastatin in 28 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia as a result of a receptor-negative mutation (Trp23-stop) and in 30 patients with a receptor-binding defective mutation (Trp66-Gly) to test the hypothesis that response to treatment depends on the type of mutation. Patients were randomized to 12 weeks of treatment with fluvastatin 40 mg daily and 12 weeks of placebo treatment, preceded by a placebo run-in period of 8 weeks in a double-blind, cross-over design. Untreated plasma concentrations of lipids and lipoproteins were similar in the two groups of patients. Plasma cholesterol and LDL cholesterol response to therapy tended to be less marked in receptor-binding defective patients, but the differences were not statistically significant. A tabulation of the results of the present and earlier studies suggests that differences in treatment response as an apparent function of LDL-receptor gene mutational type occur mainly in populations with recent genetic admixture (<400 years). In such populations, persons with the same mutation in the LDL-receptor gene are more likely to share other but undetermined genetic variations affecting the pharmacology of statins.

Determinants of Variable Response to Statin Treatment in Patients With Refractory Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Abstract —Interindividual variability in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C) response during treatment with statins is well documented but poorly understood. To investigate potential metabolic and genetic determinants of statin responsiveness, 19 patients with refractory heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia were sequentially treated with placebo, atorvastatin (10 mg/d), bile acid sequestrant, and the 2 combined, each for 4 weeks. Levels of LDL-C, mevalonic acid (MVA), 7-α-OH-4-cholesten-3-one, and leukocyte LDL receptor and hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase mRNA were determined after each treatment period. Atorvastatin (10 mg/d) reduced LDL-C by an overall mean of 32.5%. Above-average responders (ΔLDL-C −39.5%) had higher basal MVA levels (34.4±6.1 μmol/L) than did below-average responders (ΔLDL-C −23.6%, P <0.02; basal MVA 26.3±6.1 μmol/L, P <0.01). Fewer good responders compared with the poor responders had an apolipoprotein E4 allele (3 of 11 versus 6 of 8, respectively; P <0.05). There were no baseline differences between them in 7-α-OH-4-cholesten-3-one, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase mRNA, or LDL receptor mRNA, but the latter increased in the good responders on combination therapy ( P <0.05). Severe mutations were not more common in poor than in good responders. We conclude that poor responders to statins have a low basal rate of cholesterol synthesis that may be secondary to a genetically determined increase in cholesterol absorption, possibly mediated by apolipoprotein E4. If so, statin responsiveness could be enhanced by reducing dietary cholesterol intake or inhibiting absorption.

Transjugular approach to concurrent mitral-aortic and mitral-tricuspid balloon valvuloplasty

A transjugular approach was successfully used for concurrent mitral-aortic and mitral-tricuspid valvuloplasty in one patient each. This approach simplifies antegrade transvenous aortic valve dilatation in rheumatic aortic stenosis. Advantages obtained by transjugular tricuspid valvuloplasty are easy crossing of the tricuspid valve and stable balloon position, co-axial with the tricuspid orifice.

Definitive percutaneous treatment of Lutembacher's syndrome

Definitive percutaneous treatment of a patient with Lutembacher's syndrome was successfully accomplished using the Amplatzer septal occluder to close a secundum atrial septal defect and the Joseph mitral balloon catheter to dilate rheumatic mitral valve stenosis. Transcatheter therapy is an effective alternative to surgery in selected patients with Lutembacher's syndrome. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:199-204, 1999.

Treatment of dyslipidemia: genetic interactions with diet and drug therapy

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is multifactorial, and its manifestation is determined by multiple gene loci and their interaction with a cohort of environmental factors. Variation at several candidate gene loci has already been shown to have a significant effect over the spectrum of plasma lipid levels observed in the population. Moreover, some variants are known to influence the interindividual variability in response to dietary and pharmacologic interventions aimed to reduce atherogenic lipoproteins. The continuous progress in this area of research is getting us closer to the development of genetic screening panels that will allow a more precise assessment of individual CHD risk and response to therapeutic interventions.

Genetic testing, screening, and counseling issues in cardiovascular disease

Genetic risk assessment for cardiovascular disease is less advanced and less widely performed to date than it is for cancer. Yet it is no less important. Alert clinicians should "think genetically" and follow up appropriately when confronted with a client having a family history of heart disease, early heart disease themselves, a known genetic disorder in which cardiac problems may be a component, or signs and symptoms indicative of a familial component to the heart problem observed. It is important for the clinician to know how, when, and to whom referral for further genetic evaluation and counseling should be made. Genetic testing and screening in children or adolescents for conditions such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), and long QT (LQT) syndrome, when indicated, can help to save lives through preventive treatment and therapeutic interventions. Preparticipation sports physicals are one means of providing such screening and are important to conduct properly under guidelines recommended by the American Heart Association. Genetic testing for relatives of persons already identified to have heritable cardiac conditions is becoming more and more integral to mainstream primary health care but engender controversy when testing of children is involved. Clinicians must know how to interpret the results of such tests. Appropriate genetic counseling must accompany risk assessment, genetic testing, and screening for cardiovascular disease.

The type of mutation in the low density lipoprotein receptor gene influences the cholesterol-lowering response of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

In a genetically heterogeneous group of 109 patients with a clinical diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), the influence of gender, apolipoprotein (apo) E genotype and the type of molecular defect in the LDL-receptor (LDLR) gene on the reduction of plasma LDL-cholesterol levels to treatment with a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (simvastatin) were studied. Response was determined as the percentage fall in LDL-cholesterol from untreated levels and as the proportion of patients where levels fell below 4.9 or 4.1 mmol/l. Of the patients, 86 individuals had tendon xanthomata (TX+) and a diagnosis of 'definite' FH and these individuals presented with a significantly higher untreated LDL-cholesterol compared to the 23 individuals who did not have xanthomas (TX-) and a diagnosis of 'probable' FH (8.14+/-0.19 vs. 6.81+/-0.25, P= 0.001). Overall, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor doses of 10, 20 or 40 mg/day resulted in a significant fall of LDL-cholesterol levels of 29, 39 and 49%, but at all doses those with TX had significantly higher levels than those without, and significantly fewer TX + patients achieved LDL-cholesterol levels below 4.9 or 4.1 mmol/l than the TX - group (P < 0.05 at each dose). In the TX+ group the response to treatment was of similar magnitude in men and women and in patients with different apoE genotype. In the 'probable' FH probands only three mutations were identified (detection rate 13%), one in the LDLR gene and two in the APOB gene, a detection rate significantly lower (P= 0.02) than in the 'definite' FH probands where 28 mutations were detected (detection rate 37%). In the TX + patients where no mutation was detected, treatment resulted in a greater proportion achieving LDL-cholesterol levels below 4.9 and 4.1 mmol/l compared to those with any LDLR mutation, this difference was close to statistical significance at the 4.9 mmol/l threshold at 10 mg/day (41 vs. 13%, P = 0.058). For the 14 patients with an LDLR mutation that was predicted to be 'severe', fewer achieved LDL-cholesterol levels below 4.9 or 4.1 mmol/l at each dosage compared to the 16 individuals with 'mild' mutations, and this difference was statistically significant at the maximal dosage of 40 mg/day (P = 0.018). Thus although characterisation of the molecular defect in FH patients may not be relevant to their immediate clinical management, those with a particular mutation may need more aggressive lipid-lowering treatment to reach LDL-cholesterol levels recommended to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD).