Propafenone for the treatment of supraventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Historical Aspects of the Use of Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Clinical Practice

Heart rhythm disorders are one of the most urgent problems in cardiology. The first reports on the possibility of using drugs in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias began to appear in the scientific literature from the middle of the 18th century. This pharmacotherapeutic direction has been developed since the second half of the 20th century, when new antiarrhythmic drugs began to be used in clinical practice. The introduction of new drugs and modern methods of treating arrhythmias into clinical practice has significantly improved the prognosis and quality of life of patients. Combination antiarrhythmic therapy, including antiarrhythmic drugs and radiofrequency ablation, seems to be the most promising and successful tactic for treating patients in the future. A historical review of the literature on the clinical use of antiarrhythmic drugs both in past years and at present is presented in the article.

Modern treatment of supraventricular tachycardia

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is one of the most common arrhythmias. The prevalence of SVT varies widely in different countries and is 2,25 per 1,000 people in the general population. SVT reduce the quality of life of patients, and in some cases can worsen the prognosis. In patients with cardiovascular disease, the risk of SVT increases. Therapy of SVT is selected depending on the stability of hemodynamic and the QRS width. Until now, the treatment of SVT remains an urgent issue of modern cardiology, since despite the high effectiveness of catheter ablation, antiarrhythmic therapy plays an important role.

Atrial fibrillation management: evaluating rate vs rhythm control

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasing global issue leading to increased hospitalizations, adverse health related events and mortality. This review focuses on the management of atrial fibrillation, in particular in the past decade, comparing two major strategies, rate or rhythm control. We evaluate the evidence for each strategy, pharmacological options and the increasing utilization of invasive techniques, in particular catheter ablation and use of implantable cardiac pacing devices. Pharmacological comparative trials evaluating both strategies have shown rate control being non-inferior to rhythm control for clinical outcomes of mortality and other cardiovascular events (including stroke). Catheter ablation techniques, involving radiofrequency ablation and recently cryoablation, have shown promising results in particular with paroxysmal AF. However, persistent AF provides ongoing challenges and will be a particular focus of continued research.

Taquicardias supraventriculares. Estado del arte

<p>Las taquicardias supraventriculares son un grupo de entidades clínicas prevalentes en la población general, pero que afectan con mayor frecuencia a la población adulta; son ritmos rápidos y generalmente regulares en los cuales se encuentra implicada alguna estructura por encima de la bifurcación del haz de His para formación o perpetuación. El diagnóstico de estas entidades requiere un abordaje clínico sistemático, siendo el electrocardiograma de superficie la principal herramienta para su adecuada clasificación. El tratamiento de las taquicardias supraventriculares dependerá del estado hemodinámico del paciente, el cual definirá el requerimiento de terapia eléctrica o tratamiento médico. Se debe hacer una selección adecuada de los pacientes que requieren estudio electrofisiológico y ablación.</p>

Pharmacokinetics of propafenone hydrochloride sustained-release capsules in male beagle dogs

This paper describes the development and validation of a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric assay for propafenone and its application to a pharmacokinetic study of propafenone administered as a new propafenone hydrochloride sustained-release capsule (SR-test), as an instant-release tablet (IR-reference) and as the market leader sustained-release capsule (Rythmol, SR-reference) in male beagle dogs (n=8). In Study A comparing SR-test with IR-reference in a crossover design T max and t 1/2 of propafenone for SR-test were significantly higher than those for IR-reference while C max and AUC were lower demonstrating the sustained release properties of the new formulation. In Study B comparing SR-test with SR-reference the observed C max and AUC of propafenone for SR-test (124.5±140.0 ng/mL and 612.0±699.2 ng·h/mL, respectively) were higher than for SR-reference (78.52±72.92 ng/mL and 423.6±431.6 ng·h/mL, respectively) although the differences were not significant. Overall, the new formulation has as good if not better sustained release characteristics to the market leader formulation.

Intravenous amiodarone for acute pharmacological conversion of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia seen in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Pharmacological conversion of atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm (NSR) may be a feasible management strategy in selected patients. Recent guidelines have recommended intravenous amiodarone, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, for the conversion of AF to NSR. The purpose of this review is to examine the published evidence for the efficacy of IV amiodarone for the acute conversion of AF to NSR in the ED. Currently available data from 11 randomized, controlled trials and 3 meta analyses do not support the use of conventional doses of IV amiodarone for acute conversion in the ED. High dose IV or combined IV and oral administration may be effective as early as 8 hours in patients with recent-onset AF of <48 hour duration in patients without contraindications to these high dose regimens. There are no data to support the use of IV amiodarone for acute conversion in patients with an ejection fraction of <40% or clinical heart failure, so its use in these scenarios should be limited to symptomatic patients who are refractory to electrical conversion. More well-designed studies are required to determine the role of IV amiodarone for the acute conversion of AF in the ED.

Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy of Supraventricular Tachycardia

Pharmacologic therapy is commonly used for the acute treatment and termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and continues to be an important long-term option for some patients. Drug choice depends on the correct diagnosis of the arrhythmia and an understanding of its mechanism. Pharmacologic agents commonly used in the acute and chronic treatment of SVT are reviewed along with their effect on the various types of SVT. Drugs that are well tolerated with minimal side effects are preferred over agents with perhaps more efficacy but higher risk of toxicity.

Catheter ablation is established as a treatment option for atrial fibrillation--is catheter ablation established as a treatment option of atrial fibrillation? (Pro)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and it has a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. Large randomized trials have failed to demonstrate a benefit for mortality of the pharmacological rhythm control strategy as compared with the rate control strategy, indicating that rate control may be an adequate treatment for AF. However, further study determined that the presence of AF at the time of study termination was a more potent predictor of mortality than the treatment strategy, suggesting the importance of sinus rhythm. On the other hand, catheter ablation recently has emerged as an alternative treatment option to pharmacological therapy for AF. Although AF ablation is an invasive strategy, over the past decade its efficacy has increased and the complication rate has decreased with the growing experience of operators and evolving technology. Moreover, the ablation methodology, such as pulmonary vein isolation based ablation, is consistent worldwide and the success rate of AF ablation, especially in paroxysmal AF, is similar. Therefore, catheter ablation is established as a treatment option for AF.

Acute management of atrial fibrillation

Acute atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac rhythm encountered in clinical practice and is commonly seen in acutely ill patients in critical care. In the latter setting, AF may have two main clinical sequelae: (1) haemodynamic instability and (2) thromboembolism. The approach to the management of AF can broadly be divided into a rate control strategy or a rhythm control strategy, and is largely driven by symptom assessment and functional status. A crucial part of AF management requires the appropriate use of thromboprophylaxis. In patients who are haemodynamically unstable with AF, urgent direct current cardioversion should be considered. Apart from electrical cardioversion, drugs are commonly used, and Class I (flecainide, propafenone) and Class III (amiodarone) antiarrhythmic drugs are more likely to revert AF to sinus rhythm. Beta blockers and rate limiting calcium blockers, as well as digoxin, are often used in controlling heart rate in patients with acute onset AF. The aim of this review article is to provide an overview of the management of AF in the critical care setting.

Comparison of intravenous ibutilide vs. propafenone for rapid termination of recent onset atrial fibrillation

This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibutilide and propafenone given intravenously in converting recent onset atrial fibrillation (AF). Eighty-two consecutive patients with AF (onset in 2 h to 90 days) were randomly assigned to receive two 10-min infusions, 10 min apart, of either ibutilide (1 mg) or propafenone (70 mg). The treatment was considered successful if sinus rhythm occurred within 90 min after the beginning of infusion. Ibutilide had a significantly higher rate of cardioversion than propafenone (70.73 vs. 48.78%, p = 0.043). The patients with shorter AF duration or smaller left atrium diameter had a higher success rate. Nonsustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was the most serious adverse effect of ibutilide in 9.76% of patients, and hypotension and heart pause were the major serious adverse events in 17.07% of patients treated with propafenone. Ibutilide is more effective than intravenous propafenone for the cardioversion of recent onset AF, and the adverse effects are rare and transient.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy of atrial fibrillation

In the post-AFFIRM era, treatment of AF has become the treatment of symptoms. In some patients, this will be simple rate control, but there remain a significant cohort of patients in whom rate control alone does not give acceptable symptom relief. In this group, antiarrhythmic therapy still has a role, and the AFFIRM trial indicates that this therapeutic strategy is without significant deleterious effect on mortality. The choice of antiarrhythmic agent must be individualized according to underlying cardiac pathologies and comorbidities, however. Most recently, the introduction of dofetilide has widened the therapeutic options in patients with severe heart disease, and the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation indicated the superior efficacy of amiodarone at low doses. The release/ development of newer Class III antiarrhythmic agents may offer hope for the benefits of amiodarone without the serious adverse effects with long-term therapy.

Advances in the acute pharmacologic management of cardiac arrhythmias

Safe and effective control of rapid ventricular rates in acute-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) can be accomplished with intravenous calcium antagonists, beta-blockers or amiodarone; digoxin is less effective. If pharmacologic cardioversion of AF is desired, single oral doses of propafenone or flecainide are safe and effective in patients without structural heart disease. Intravenous ibulitide is moderately effective in the conversion of persistent AF or atrial flutter, with a small risk of proarrhythmia. In wide QRS complex tachycardia of uncertain origin, adenosine and lidocaine are no longer recommended. Procainamide or amiodarone are the treatment options, but attempts should be made to define the origin of tachycardia. In the treatment of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, lidocaine is no longer recommended; procainamide or amiodarone are the recommended therapies. In polymorphic ventricular tachycardia with a normal QT interval, beta-blockers are recommended. In shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation, lidocaine, and magnesium are ineffective; intravenous amiodarone should be the treatment of choice.

Oral loading with propafenone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a review on in-hospital treatment

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a very common arrhythmia. In order to treat acute AF rapidly, effective drug regimens are required. Propafenone is a class IC antiarrhythmic agent that is suitable for oral loading as it reaches peak plasma concentrations within 2 to 4 hours of administration. The use of propafenone loading in patients with AF must be based on appropriate patient selection in view of the negative inotropic effect and the potential proarrhythmic effects of the drug. A series of controlled trials in patients with recent-onset AF without heart failure who were hospitalised with enforced bed rest has shown that orally loaded propafenone (450 to 600 mg as single dose) exerts a relatively quick effect (within 3 to 4 hours) and a high rate of efficacy (72 to 78% within 8 hours). A potentially harmful effect of class IC agents is the risk of transforming AF into atrial flutter (3.5 to 5% of patients). However, atrial flutter with 1 : 1 atrioventricular response was observed in only two of 709 patients receiving propafenone (0.3% incidence). Nevertheless, the potential negative inotropic effect of propafenone demands careful patient selection, with systematic exclusion of patients with left ventricular dysfunction or congestive heart failure. Oral loading with propafenone can be considered as an episodic treatment in patients with AF recurrences, as has been proposed for other drugs in the past. However, the safety of oral loading with propafenone as an outpatient treatment in appropriately selected patients has to be assessed by appropriately designed prospective studies.

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia induced by oral stimulation: a case report and review of swallow-induced dysrhythmias

We present the case of a 54-year-old man who experienced reproducible paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with simple oral stimulation. The tachycardia was felt to be focal atrial fibrillation, and the patient was placed on propafenone with good results. There are no previous known cases of this exact condition. However, this may represent a variant of swallow-induced tachycardia. Case reports involving swallow-induced tachycardia with speculated mechanisms and treatments are discussed.

Arterial hypertension and cardiac arrhythmias

PURPOSE AND DATA IDENTIFICATION: One of the main clinical problems of patients with arterial hypertension is the presence of arrhythmias, especially if left ventricular hypertrophy exists. Recent results from our group and all data available via Med-Line-search have been analysed. The analysis was focused on atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and arrhythmic risk prediction, using non-invasive markers. RESULTS OF ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: Arterial hypertension is a major cause of non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation and other supraventricular arrhythmias. The prevalence of ventricular arrhythmias is increased in hypertensive patients without left ventricular hypertrophy, compared to normotensives. If left ventricular hypertrophy is present, the risk for ventricular tachycardias is quadrupled. The presence of left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with an increase in all-cause mortality by a factor of seven in men and nine in women. In particular, patients with hypertrophy, increased rate of ventricular extrasystoles up to non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and ST-depression in long-term ECG are threatened by sudden cardiac death. At present, it is not possible to safely identify patients with increased risk. Regression of hypertrophy exists along with a decreased rate of ventricular extrasystoles. We hypothesize that by the regression of hypertrophy, the prevalence of sustained ventricular tachycardia decreases and therefore the prognosis of those patients can be improved, although controlled studies are not yet available.

Single oral loading dose of propafenone for pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation

The efficacy and safety of the single dose oral loading regimen of propafenone for pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AFib) was evaluated by analyzing the trials on the subject identified through a comprehensive literature search. Most of the trials used a single dose of 600 mg for oral loading. The success rates ranged from 56% to 83%, depending on the duration of AFib and follow-up after drug administration. The conversion time ranged from 110 +/- 59 to 287 +/- 352 min, depending on the duration of observation after drug administration. The single dose oral loading regimen of propafenone was significantly more efficacious than placebo in the first 8 h after administration but not at 24 h. Compared with the intravenous regimen, the oral regimen resulted in fewer conversions in the first 2 h, but both regimens were equally efficacious afterward. The oral propafenone regimen was as efficacious as the single dose oral loading regimen of flecainide but was superior to those of quinidine and amiodarone. The adverse effects reported were transient arrhythmia, reversible QRS-complex widening, transient hypotension and mild noncardiac side effects. The transient arrhythmias were chiefly at the time of conversion and included appearance of atrial flutter, bradycardia, pauses and junctional rhythm. No life-threatening proarrhythmic adverse effects were reported. The single oral loading dose of propafenone appears to be highly effective for conversion of recent-onset AFib, with a relatively rapid effect within 2 to 3 h and freedom from serious adverse effects.

Cost effectiveness of therapies for atrial fibrillation. A review

Atrial fibrillation is the most common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, affecting over 5% of persons over the age of 65 years. A common pathophysiological mechanism for arrhythmia development is atrial distention and fibrosis induced by hypertension, coronary artery disease or ventricular dysfunction. Less frequently, atrial fibrillation is caused by mitral stenosis or other provocative factors such as thyrotoxicosis, pericarditis or alcohol intoxication. Depending on the extent of associated cardiovascular disease, atrial fibrillation may produce haemodynamic compromise, or symptoms such as palpitations, fatigue, chest pain or dyspnoea. Arrhythmia-induced atrial stasis can precipitate clot formation and the potential for subsequent thromboembolism. Comprehensive management of atrial fibrillation requires a multifaceted approach directed at controlling symptoms, protecting the patient from ischaemic stroke or peripheral embolism and possible conversion to or maintenance of sinus rhythm. Numerous randomised trials have demonstrated the efficacy of warfarin--and less so aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid)--in reducing the risk of embolic events. Furthermore, therapeutic strategies exist that can favourably modify symptoms by restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm with cardioversion and antiarrhythmic prophylaxis. However, the risks and benefits of various treatments is highly dependent on patient-specific features, emphasising the need for an individualised approach. This article reviews the findings of cost-effectiveness studies published over the past decade that have evaluated different components of treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation. These studies demonstrate the economic attractiveness of acute management options, long term warfarin prophylaxis, telemetry-guided initiation of antiarrhythmic therapy, approaches to restore and maintain sinus rhythm, and the potential role of transoesophageal echocardiographic screening for atrial thrombus prior to pharmacological or electrical cardioversion. Further, we discuss the merits and limitations of the cost-effectiveness analyses in the context of overall treatment strategies. Finally, we identify areas that will require additional research to achieve the goal of effective and economically efficient management of atrial fibrillation.