1
|
Gonzalez PE, Hebbe A, Hussain Y, Khera R, Banerjee S, Plomondon ME, Waldo SW, Pfau SE, Curtis JP, Shah SM. Real-World Experience and Outcomes With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Protected Versus Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from the Veteran Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program. Am J Cardiol 2024; 222:39-50. [PMID: 38677666 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.04.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
The practice patterns and outcomes of protected left main (PLM) and unprotected left main (ULM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are not well defined in contemporary US clinical practice. Data were collected from all Veteran Affairs catheterization laboratories participating in the Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program between 2009 and 2019. The analysis included 4,351 patients who underwent left main PCI, of whom 1,306 pairs of PLM and ULM PCI were included in a propensity-matched cohort. Selected temporal trends were also assessed. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) outcomes at 1 year, which was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, rehospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI), rehospitalization for stroke, or urgent revascularization. Patients who underwent ULM PCI compared with patients who underwent PLM PCI were older (age 71.5 vs 69.2 years, p <0.001), more clinically complex, and more likely to present with acute coronary syndrome. In the propensity-matched cohort, radial access was used more often for ULM PCI (21% [273] vs 14% [185], p <0.001) and ULM PCI was more likely to involve the left main bifurcation (22% vs 14%, p = 0.003) and require mechanical circulatory support (10% [134] vs 1% [17], p <0.001). The 1-year MACEs occurred more frequently with ULM PCI than PLM PCI (22% [289] vs 16% [215], p ≤0.001) and all-cause mortality was also higher (16% [213] vs 10% [125], p ≤0.001). In the matched cohort, there was a low incidence of rehospitalization for MI (4% [48] ULM vs 4% [48] PLM, p = 1.000) or revascularization (7% [94] ULM vs 6% [84] PLM, p = 0.485). In this real-world experience, patients who underwent PLM PCI had better 1-year outcomes than those who underwent ULM PCI; however, in both groups, there was a high rate of mortality and MACEs at 1 year despite a relatively low rate of MI or revascularization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Engel Gonzalez
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Annika Hebbe
- Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado; CART Program, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Yasin Hussain
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Rohan Khera
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Subhash Banerjee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas
| | - Mary E Plomondon
- Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado; CART Program, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Stephen W Waldo
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado; Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Steven E Pfau
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jeptha P Curtis
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Samit M Shah
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gonzalez PE, Hebbe A, Hussain Y, Khera R, Banerjee S, Plomondon ME, Waldo SW, Pfau SE, Curtis JP, Shah SM. Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Protected versus Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from the VA CART Program. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.10.27.23297698. [PMID: 37961093 PMCID: PMC10635229 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.27.23297698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Background Practice patterns and outcomes of protected left main (PLM) and unprotected left main (ULM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as well as the differences between these types of PCI, are not well defined in real-world clinical practice. Methods Data collected from all Veteran Affairs (VA) catheterization laboratories participating in the Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program between 2009 and 2019. The analysis included 4,351 patients undergoing left main PCI, of which 1,306 pairs of PLM and ULM PCI were included in a propensity matched cohort. Patients and procedural characteristics were compared between PLM and ULM PCI. Temporal trends were also assessed. Peri-procedural and one-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared using cumulative incidence plots. The primary outcome was MACE outcomes at 1-year, which was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, rehospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI), rehospitalization for stroke or urgent revascularization. Results ULM PCI patients in comparison to PLM PCI were older (71.5 vs 69.2; P < 0.001), more clinically complex and more likely to present with ACS. In the propensity matched cohort, radial access was used more often for ULM PCI (21% [273] vs. 14% [185], P < 0.001), and ULM PCI was more likely to involve the LM bifurcation (22% vs 14%; P = 0.003) and require mechanical circulatory support (10% [134] vs 1% [17]; P <0.001). One-year MACE occurred more frequently with ULM PCI compared to PLM PCI (22% [289] vs. 16% [215]; P = < 0.001) and all-cause mortality was also higher (16% [213] vs. 10% [125]; P = < 0.001). In the matched cohort there was a low incidence of rehospitalization for MI (4% [48] ULM vs. 4% [48] PLM; P = 1.000) or revascularization (7% [94] ULM vs. 6% [84] PLM; P = 0.485). Conclusions Veterans undergoing PLM PCI had better one-year outcomes than those undergoing ULM PCI, but in both groups there was a high rate of mortality and MACE at one-year despite a relatively low rate of MI or revascularization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Engel Gonzalez
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Annika Hebbe
- Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado
- CART Program, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - Yasin Hussain
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Rohan Khera
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Subhash Banerjee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas
| | - Mary E Plomondon
- Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado
- CART Program, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
| | - Stephen W Waldo
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
- Section of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Steven E Pfau
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jeptha P Curtis
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Samit M Shah
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baglini R, Amaducci A, D'Ancona G. Left Main Coronary In-Stent Intimal Hyperplasia and Hemodynamics as Detected by Contrast-Enhanced Transesophageal Echocardiography. Echocardiography 2013; 30:317-23. [DOI: 10.1111/echo.12040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Baglini
- Department of Interventional Cardiology; Ismett/UPMC; Palermo; Italy
| | - Andrea Amaducci
- Department of Interventional Cardiology; Ismett/UPMC; Palermo; Italy
| | - Giuseppe D'Ancona
- Department of Interventional Cardiology; Ismett/UPMC; Palermo; Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
|
5
|
Shemin RJ. Coronary artery bypass grafting versus stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: where lies the body of proof? Circulation 2008; 118:2326-9. [PMID: 19047591 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.108.820324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
6
|
Schrale RG, van Gaal W, Channon K, Forfar J, Ormerod O, Banning A. Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 2008; 130:185-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2006] [Revised: 05/13/2007] [Accepted: 08/03/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
7
|
Taggart DP, Kaul S, Boden WE, Ferguson TB, Guyton RA, Mack MJ, Sergeant PT, Shemin RJ, Smith PK, Yusuf S. Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Stem Coronary Artery Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51:885-92. [PMID: 18308155 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2007] [Revised: 08/09/2007] [Accepted: 09/07/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
8
|
Abstract
Patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery present difficult challenges. The risks associated with this lesion have been known since the early days of angiography when patients were found to have increased mortality during follow-up. This information led to the general guidelines that surgical revascularization should be considered the treatment of choice in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis. Current advances in invasive cardiology have brought important information to the field. Intravascular ultrasound is now used routinely to evaluate angiographically indeterminate lesions with criteria now set forward as to what constitutes an indication for revascularization. Stents have even further dramatically changed the landscape. There are substantial issues, however, that need to addressed. These include the following: (1) the effect of specific lesion location on outcome - it is known that patients with distal bifurcation left main disease have worse outcome; (2) the potential for subacute thrombosis of the left main coronary artery; (3) the impact of left ventricular function and patient comorbidities irrespective of the degree and location of left main coronary artery stenosis; and (4) the risk-benefit ratio of stenting versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery. These issues are currently being addressed in two seminally important trials including the SYNTAX trial, which randomizes patients with left main and/or three-vessel disease to either coronary artery bypass graft surgery or a TAXUS drug-eluting stent. This trial is in the final stages of patient recruitment and will have important implications for the field. The other trial is the COMBAT trial, which is focused exclusively on left main coronary artery stenosis and randomizes patients with left main coronary artery disease either to a Sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher, Johnson and Johnson Cordis, USA) or to coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The field of left main coronary artery disease continues to expand in terms of the evidence available for optimal patient evaluation and selection of treatment modalities.
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee BK, Hong MK, Lee CW, Choi BR, Kim MJ, Park KH, Kim YH, Han KH, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ. Five-year outcomes after stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in patients with normal left ventricular function. Int J Cardiol 2007; 115:208-13. [PMID: 16904209 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2005] [Revised: 01/05/2006] [Accepted: 02/24/2006] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We analyzed the long-term (5-year) outcome of patients treated with stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis. METHODS Between January 1995 and September 2001, 187 consecutive patients with unprotected LMCA stenosis and normal left ventricular function underwent elective stenting. Patients were examined or interviewed after 1, 3 and 6 months, and every 4 months thereafter for the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS The procedural success rate was 99.5%. During hospitalization, there were no deaths and only one stent thrombosis. Six-month angiography in 162 patients (follow-up rate, 86.6%) showed a restenosis rate of 33.3%. During 5-year follow-up, there were 13 deaths (6 cardiac, 7 noncardiac) and 2 nonfatal MI. TLRs were required in 36 (20.9%) patients and new lesion revascularizations were required in 13 (5.0%) patients. At 1, 3 and 5 years, the cumulative probabilities for freedom from MACE were 79.9+/-1.8%, 77.5+/-2.5% and 77.5+/-2.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION The initial favorable outcomes of patients with normal left ventricular function after stenting of unprotected LMCA stenosis were sustained for up to 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bong-Ki Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University College of Medicine, Chunchon, Kangwon-do, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Taggart DP. Thomas B. Ferguson Lecture. Coronary artery bypass grafting is still the best treatment for multivessel and left main disease, but patients need to know. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82:1966-75. [PMID: 17126093 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.06.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2006] [Revised: 06/02/2006] [Accepted: 06/02/2006] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David P Taggart
- John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lozano Í, Herrera C, Morís C, Gómez-Hospital JA, Rondán J, Iráculis E, Martín M, Cequier Á, Suáreza E, Esplugas E. Stent liberador de fármacos en lesiones de tronco coronario izquierdo en pacientes no candidatos a revascularización quirúrgica. Rev Esp Cardiol 2005. [DOI: 10.1157/13071888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
12
|
Bottner RK, Klein LW. Society news page: Do the Current ACC/AHA guidelines correctly reflect the attitudes and utilization of PCI in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64:402-5. [PMID: 15736261 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
13
|
Abstract
Since its introduction in 1977, the success of percutaneous interventional cardiology has been limited by the occurrence of restenosis. Drug-eluting stents, particularly sirolimus- and paclitaxel-coated stents, have been shown in randomized controlled trials to dramatically reduce restenosis in single, de novo, native coronary arteries. Over the last 2 years, investigators have reported that these stents can also reduce restenosis in more complex patient situations such as in diabetics, during acute coronary syndromes, in long atherosclerotic lesions and small arteries, and even after in-stent restenosis. These outcomes increase the clinical value of this technology to "real world" practice. This article reviews the current state of our knowledge regarding drug-eluting stents and identifies areas for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie A Stanik-Hutt
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, and Inpatient Cardiology Nurse Practitioner Service, Department of Nursing, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Brueren BRG, Ernst JMPG, Suttorp MJ, ten Berg JM, Rensing BJWM, Mast EG, Bal ET, Six AJ, Plokker HWM. Long term follow up after elective percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected non-bifurcational left main stenosis: is it time to change the guidelines? BRITISH HEART JOURNAL 2003; 89:1336-9. [PMID: 14594895 PMCID: PMC1767944 DOI: 10.1136/heart.89.11.1336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis is contraindicated and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is preferred. However, PCI of the LMCA is performed under exceptional circumstances. OBJECTIVE To analyse the data of patients who underwent PCI of the unprotected LMCA in St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands. RESULTS In a database of 17 683 PCI procedures, 71 patients (0.4%) were found with non-bifurcational LMCA stenosis who underwent an elective PCI between 1991 and 2001. Ages ranged from 26.7-86.5 years. Severe concomitant disease was the most frequent argument in favour of PCI instead of CABG. PCI consisted of only balloon angioplasty in 23 cases (32.4%). A stent was used in 46 cases (64.4%). Average follow up was 43 months (range 0-121 months). One patient died one day after the procedure. The total one year survival rate was 98.6% (70/71). Seven patients died during the follow up period, mostly because of non-cardiac reasons. The annual mortality rate was 2.5%. Recurrent elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for restenosis of the LMCA was performed in one patient (1.4%) six weeks after the initial procedure. CABG was required in 13 patients (18.3%) throughout the follow up period. CONCLUSION These results suggest that at highly experienced centres, elective PCI of the non-bifurcational LMCA can be performed safely where the anatomy is suitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B R G Brueren
- Department of Cardiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Arampatzis CA, Lemos PA, Tanabe K, Hoye A, Degertekin M, Saia F, Lee CH, Ruiter A, McFadden E, Sianos G, Smits PC, van der Giessen WJ, de Feijter P, van Domburg R, Serruys PW. Effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stent for treatment of left main coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92:327-9. [PMID: 12888147 DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00640-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The present study reports on the clinical outcome of 31 consecutive patients with left main coronary artery disease treated with a sirolimus-eluting stent. The implantation of this stent was associated with abolition of post-discharge fatal events and percutaneous reintervention.
Collapse
|
16
|
Sadeghi HM, O'Neill WW, Grines CL. Percutaneous intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery. J Interv Cardiol 2003; 16:281-8. [PMID: 12800408 DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.8051.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Successful percutaneous intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) in lieu of surgical revascularization represents the next wave of challenges that the field of interventional cardiology will try to overcome. Significant LMCA stenosis, commonly secondary to atherosclerosis, is seen in about 4-10% of cases presenting to the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Currently, the vast majority of these patients undergo surgical revascularization unless there are prohibitive reasons for surgical revascularization. Several challenges of percutaneous revascularization have been overcome with stents, intravascular brachytherapy, and other technical improvements. Yet, several remaining limitations of percutaneous intervention, such as in-stent restenosis, have to be improved further before randomized clinical trials of surgical and percutaneous revascularization of unprotected LMCA disease can be contemplated to establish a new standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Mehrdad Sadeghi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tan WA, Tamai H, Park SJ, Plokker HW, Nobuyoshi M, Suzuki T, Colombo A, Macaya C, Holmes DR, Cohen DJ, Whitlow PL, Ellis SG. Long-term clinical outcomes after unprotected left main trunk percutaneous revascularization in 279 patients. Circulation 2001; 104:1609-14. [PMID: 11581137 DOI: 10.1161/hc3901.096669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCI) has been increasingly applied to unprotected left main trunk (LMT) lesions, with varied long-term success. This study attempts to define the predictors of outcome in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS Two hundred seventy-nine consecutive patients who had LMT PCI at 1 of 25 sites between 1993 and 1998 were studied. Forty-six percent of these patients were deemed inoperable or at high surgical risk. Thirty-eight patients (13.7%) died in hospital, and the rest were followed up for a mean of 19 months. The 1-year incidence was 24.2% for all-cause mortality, 20.2% for cardiac mortality, 9.8% for myocardial infarction, and 9.4% for CABG. Independent correlates of all-cause mortality were left ventricular ejection fraction </=30%, mitral regurgitation grade 3 or 4, presentation with myocardial infarction and shock, creatinine >/=2.0 mg/dL, and severe lesion calcification. For the 32% of patients <65 years old with left ventricular ejection fraction >30% and without shock, the prevalence of these adverse risk factors was low. No periprocedural deaths were observed in this low-risk subset, and the 1-year mortality was only 3.4%. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing unprotected LMT PCI have frequent serious comorbidities and consequently have high event rates. PCI may be an alternative to CABG for a select proportion of elective patients and may also be appropriate for highly symptomatic inoperable patients. Meticulous follow-up of hospital survivors is required because of the rather high mortality during the first few months after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W A Tan
- Pittsburgh Vascular Institute, UPMC Shadyside, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|