Evaluation of coronary revascularization to prevent tachycardia recurrences in survivors of ventricular fibrillation

Effect of surgical revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Registry

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo resuscitation from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias often have significant coronary artery disease, and revascularization has been shown to reduce myocardial ischemia and cardiac arrest episodes in this patient population. The magnitude of benefit attributed to revascularization has varied by study, and the use of adjunct implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy has not been well-characterized.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) registry included 3117 patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, of whom 2321 (77%) had documented coronary artery disease and 281 (17%) underwent a coronary artery bypass grafting revascularization procedure after the index event. Patients who underwent a revascularization procedure were younger, had a lower incidence rate of prior myocardial infarction and ventricular arrhythmia, had a higher left ventricular ejection fraction, had less congestive heart failure, and were more likely to have had ventricular fibrillation as the presenting arrhythmia. Patients who underwent revascularization had a better survival rate than did those who did not undergo such a procedure after the index event, and adjustment for differing baseline patient covariates did not alter the relative survival rate benefit. Further, ICD implantation offered a similar survival rate advantage to those patients in the AVID registry with coronary artery disease independent of revascularization.

CONCLUSION

Coronary revascularization in the AVID registry patients with coronary artery disease effected a survival rate benefit that was not attributable to differences in baseline patient characteristics. The benefit of ICD on patient survival rate was not attenuated by a revascularization procedure.

Etiology and management of sustained ventricular tachycardia

Ventricular tachyarrhythmias secondary to a variety of underlying cardiovascular problems pose a therapeutic challenge to the clinician. The initial presentation may be as sudden cardiac death, which underlies its public health problem. The underlying conditions predisposing to this arrhythmia include ischemic heart disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmiogenic right ventricle dysplasia and certain postoperative states including corrective surgery for tetralogy of Fallot and valve replacement. Other causes include prolonged QT syndrome, idiopathic right and left ventricle tachycardia and bundle branch re-entry tachycardia. Ischaemic heart disease is the most common cause of ventricular tachycardia and therapy has evolved considerably over the past two decades. The development of and refinements in the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) have introduced a new dimension in therapeutic options and markedly improved survival in these patients. Insights in the dichotomy between arrhythmia suppression and total mortality have reoriented drug therapy with a decrease in the use of sodium channel blockers. beta-blockers have emerged as antiarrhythmic drugs in their own right and their synergistic effects with amiodarone have strengthened the antiarrhythmic drug arm. The role of these drugs in patients with hemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia, especially in relatively preserved ventricles needs to be explored. Catheter ablation techniques have provided curative therapy in patients with idiopathic and bundle branch reentry tachycardia. Further advances in radiofrequency ablation, including use of newer mapping techniques, promise a greater role for ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia in the future. A hybrid approach consisting of drugs, catheter ablation and/ or ICD may provide effective therapeutic approach in some situations. Further innovations and technologic developments promise a further reorientation in therapy towards identification and treatment of the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate.

Management of postinfarct ventricular tachycardias

The clinical profile of patients with postinfarct VT has changed in the past two decades. Along with these changes, existing treatments have improved, and entirely new therapeutic approaches have been developed. The expanded range of treatment options has made postinfarct VT a less imposing clinical problem than it once was. Emerging therapies promise to make an even greater beneficial impact. The challenge in treating patients with postinfarct VT has changed from merely keeping patients alive to keeping up with innovations in therapy that can provide them with a better quantity and quality of life.