A noninvasive method for the detection of dual atrioventricular node physiology in chronic atrial fibrillation

Therapeutic considerations in applying rate control therapy for atrial fibrillation

The therapeutic strategy of heart rate control for atrial fibrillation (AF) is undergoing a renaissance since several recent randomized trials demonstrated clear advantages over the rhythm control for many patients. Heart rate control for AF is hampered, however, by a dearth of information relating target heart rates to physiological measures or clinical outcomes. In this review, the rather sparse rationale behind the data elements for heart rate control - resting heart rate, activity heart rate, and regularity of the heart rate, is outlined. Beat-to-beat stroke volume is probably a key variable for calibrating heart rate targets. Presently it seems reasonable to propose targets for resting and activity heart rates but not for regularity. It also seems plausible but remains unproven that there should be a range (upper and lower) of heart rate targets rather than a simple upper limit. Nevertheless, it remains to be demonstrated through randomized clinical trials how to apply various heart rate control targets in patients with AF and whether complexity offers any advantage over simplicity.

Analysis of surface electrocardiograms in atrial fibrillation: techniques, research, and clinical applications

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. Neither the natural history of AF nor its response to therapy is sufficiently predictable by clinical and echocardiographic parameters. The purpose of this article is to describe technical aspects of novel electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis techniques and to present research and clinical applications of these methods for characterization of both the fibrillatory process and the ventricular response during AF. Atrial fibrillatory frequency (or rate) can reliably be assessed from the surface ECG using digital signal processing (extraction of atrial signals and spectral analysis). This measurement shows large inter-individual variability and correlates well with intra-atrial cycle length, a parameter which appears to have primary importance in AF maintenance and response to therapy. AF with a low fibrillatory rate is more likely to terminate spontaneously and responds better to antiarrhythmic drugs or cardioversion, whereas high-rate AF is more often persistent and refractory to therapy. Ventricular responses during AF can be characterized by a variety of methods, which include analysis of heart rate variability, RR-interval histograms, Lorenz plots, and non-linear dynamics. These methods have all shown a certain degree of usefulness, either in scientific explorations of atrioventricular (AV) nodal function or in selected clinical questions such as predicting response to drugs, cardioversion, or AV nodal modification. The role of the autonomic nervous system for AF sustenance and termination, as well as for ventricular rate responses, can be explored by different ECG analysis methods. In conclusion, non-invasive characterization of atrial fibrillatory activity and ventricular response can be performed from the surface ECG in AF patients. Different signal processing techniques have been suggested for identification of underlying AF pathomechanisms and prediction of therapy efficacy.

Ventricular rate control during atrial fibrillation and AV node modifications: past, present, and future

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia. Currently there are two broad strategic treatment options for AF: rhythm control and rate control. For rhythm control, the treatment is directed toward restoring and maintaining the sinus rhythm. For rate control, the intention is to slow ventricular rate while allowing AF to continue. In both cases anticoagulation therapy is recommended. The results of currently available clinical trials demonstrated clearly that rate control is not inferior to rhythm control. Thus, rate control is an acceptable primary therapy for many AF patients. The rate control can be achieved essentially by depressing or modifying the filtering properties of the atrioventricular (AV) node. This can be attained by medications that depress the impulse transmission within the AV node, by anatomic modification of the AV communications, as well as by autonomic manipulations that produce AV node negative dromotropic effect. We are reviewing current clinical and newer experimental modalities aimed at enhancing the lifesaving function of this remarkable nodal structure.

AV nodal pathways in the R-R interval histogram of the 24-hour monitoring ECG in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Patients with more than one AV nodal pathway show two and more peaks in the histogram of the R-R intervals of the Holter monitoring ECG during atrial fibrillation. It was the purpose of the present study to determine the number of patients showing more than one AV nodal pathway in a larger patient group with permanent atrial fibrillation by analyzing the Holter monitoring ECG.

METHODS

250 patients with permanent atrial fibrillation during Holter monitoring ECG were studied; 203 patients had structural heart disease. The number of peaks in the R-R interval histogram of each patient was determined. The distribution of the number of peaks in the R-R interval histogram in different patient groups was analyzed.

RESULTS

153 patients (61%) had one peak, 80 patients (32%) two peaks, 13 patients (5%) three peaks, and four patients (2%) four peaks, reflecting the number of different AV nodal pathways. In the different patient groups, in the patients with or without structural heart disease, with coronary heart disease, with a history of syncope, and in patients with a mean heart rate of more than 100/min, there was no significant difference in the distribution of the number of peaks in the R-R interval histogram.

CONCLUSIONS

In more than one third of all patients with permanent atrial fibrillation there are two, three, or four AV nodal pathways. It is suggested that this number of different AV nodal pathways found in the studied group can be applied to all humans. 38.8% of all patients with permanent atrial fibrillation have more than one AV nodal pathway; 6.4% of all patients with atrial fibrillation would benefit from an ablation of AV nodal pathways with shorter refractory periods for reduction of the heart rate.

Atrioventricular node modification in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation: role of morphology of RR interval variation

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the role of RR interval distribution pattern as an outcome predictor of radiofrequency (RF) modification of atrioventricular (AV) node in chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) and attempts to elucidate the likely mechanism of rate control.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty-five patients with chronic AF underwent AV node modification. The RR interval distribution pattern was derived from 24-hour ECG recordings obtained before and after the procedure. The preablation pattern was bimodal (B) in 36 patients (55%) and unimodal (U) in 29 patients (45%). After the modification procedure, the B pattern shifted to U (78%) or became modified B (22%). The mean number of RF pulses delivered and the fluoroscopy time were n=8+/-5 and 24+/-11 minutes, respectively, in patients with B pattern versus n=18+/-7 and 45+/-17 minutes in patients with U pattern (P<0.001 for both). The location of successful ablation was posteroseptal and lower midseptal in 26 patients (81%) with B pattern versus 2 (13%) with U pattern (P<0.001). Mean and maximal ventricular rates and heart rate at peak exercise were reduced after the procedure in both groups (P<0.001 for all). Long-term success rate, AV block incidence, and pacemaker implantation rate were 89%, 0%, and 8%, respectively, in patients with B pattern versus 52% (P<0.001), 21% (P=0.006), and 48% (P<0.001) in patients with U pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

RF modification of the AV node is expected to be more effective, safe, and expeditious in patients with chronic AF and B RR interval distribution pattern. Posterior atrionodal input ablation may be the prevailing mechanism of rate control in these patients, whereas U-pattern patients may benefit from partial injury to the AV node.

Multiple AV nodal pathways with multiple peaks in the RR interval histogram of the Holter monitoring ECG during atrial fibrillation

Two or more peaks on the 24-hour electrocardiogram (ECG) RR interval histogram of patients with atrial fibrillation suggests the presence multiple AV nodal pathways. The prevalence of multiple AV nodal pathways in this population is unknown. The study included 250 patients with permanent atrial fibrillation during 24-hour ECG. The number of peaks on the RR interval histogram was measured in each patient. A single peak was present in 153 patients (61%), 80 patients (32%) had two peaks, 13 patients (5%) had three, and 4 patients (2%) had four peaks. Among the 97 patients (39%) with > 1 AV nodal pathway, the estimated mean heart rate reduction by hypothetical ablation of all supernumerary AV nodal pathways with short refractory periods was 16 beats/min, from 82 to 65 beats/min. Among the overall population, 16 patients (6%) with > 1 AV nodal pathway had a mean heart rate > 100 beats/min. In this subgroup, modulation of AV node conduction by hypothetical ablation of all supernumerary AV nodal pathways with short refractory periods yielded an estimated reduction in mean heart rate of 26 +/- 15 beats/min, from 110 +/- 9 beats/min to 84 +/- 14 beats/min (P < 0.01), a 23% decrease. The presence of > 1 AV nodal pathway was suspected in 39% of all patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. The hypothetical ablation of all supernumerary AV nodal pathways with short refractory periods resulted in a clinically significant reduction in heart rate in 6% of patients in this population.