Lipoprotein (a) as a predictor of myocardial infarction in middle-aged men

Moderately elevated lipoprotein (a) levels are associated with an earlier need for percutaneous coronary intervention in recurrent cardiovascular disease

A significant number of cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients, with the target lipid levels, as set by the guidelines, achieved, continue to remain at risk. In this setting, lipoprotein (Lp) a role in CVD prognosis is regaining interest. Although Lp(a) is related to the arteriosclerotic process, there is not currently an adequate amount of data for the inclusion of Lp(a) levels as a primary therapeutic target in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. In this framework, the current retrospective study aims to investigate the association of Lp(a) levels with the adverse cardiovascular (CV) events presented in a 10 year follow-up of CVD patients with dyslipidemia and its association with the major CV risk factors. A statistically significant reduction in Lp(a) levels was observed during the follow-up period (72.8±45.6 vs. 68.3±41.8 mg/dl; McNemar test; P<0.001). The vast majority of patients who suffered a new acute myocardial infarction during the follow up period had Lp(a) levels >30 mg/dl (24/28 patients, mean ± standard deviation Lp(a), 83.1±36.6 mg/dl, P=0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis did not find statistically significant differences in a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) time occurrence during the follow-up period between patients with low (≤30 mg/dl) and high (>30 mg/dl) Lp(a) levels (log-rank P=0.305). On the other hand, when a second and third PCI conducted during the monitoring period were included in the Kaplan Meier analysis as events, the mean time for a PCI was significantly shorter (7.2%; P=0.01) for patients with Lp(a) levels >30 mg/dl. In conclusion, the current study reported that patients with high Lp(a) values are more prone to the occurrence of new myocardial infarction, while the Lp(a) cut-off value of 30 mg/dl was linked in CVD patients to an earlier need for PCI, especially in the most vulnerable group of patients with more than one (recurrent) revascularizations.

Lipoprotein(a)—The Crossroads of Atherosclerosis, Atherothrombosis and Inflammation

Increased lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels are an independent predictor of coronary artery disease (CAD), degenerative aortic stenosis (DAS), and heart failure independent of CAD and DAS. Lp(a) levels are genetically determinated in an autosomal dominant mode, with great intra- and inter-ethnic diversity. Most variations in Lp(a) levels arise from genetic variations of the gene that encodes the apolipoprotein(a) component of Lp(a), the LPA gene. LPA is located on the long arm of chromosome 6, within region 6q2.6–2.7. Lp(a) levels increase cardiovascular risk through several unrelated mechanisms. Lp(a) quantitatively carries all of the atherogenic risk of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, although it is even more prone to oxidation and penetration through endothelia to promote the production of foam cells. The thrombogenic properties of Lp(a) result from the homology between apolipoprotein(a) and plasminogen, which compete for the same binding sites on endothelial cells to inhibit fibrinolysis and promote intravascular thrombosis. LPA has up to 70% homology with the human plasminogen gene. Oxidized phospholipids promote differentiation of pro-inflammatory macrophages that secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines (e. g., interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α). The aim of this review is to define which of these mechanisms of Lp(a) is predominant in different groups of patients.

Rare thrombophilic conditions

Thrombophilia, either acquired or inherited, can be defined as a predisposition to developing thromboembolic complications. Since the discovery of antithrombin deficiency in the 1965, many other conditions have been described so far, which have then allowed to currently detect an inherited or acquired predisposition in approximately 60-70% of patients with thromboembolic disorders. These prothrombotic risk factors mainly include qualitative or quantitative defects of endogenous coagulation factor inhibitors, increased concentration or function of clotting proteins, defects in the fibrinolytic system, impaired platelet function, and hyperhomocysteinemia. In this review article, we aim to provide an overview on epidemiologic, clinic and laboratory aspects of both acquired and inherited rare thrombophilic risk factors, especially including dysfibrinogenemia, heparin cofactor II, thrombomodulin, lipoprotein(a), sticky platelet syndrome, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 apolipoprotein E, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Usefulness of Lipoprotein(a) for Predicting Clinical Outcomes After Endovascular Therapy for Aortoiliac Atherosclerotic Lesions

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of serum lipoprotein(a) as a biomarker of clinical outcomes after endovascular therapy (EVT) for atherosclerotic aortoiliac lesions.

METHODS

Serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations were measured at admission in 189 consecutive patients (median age 72 years; 160 men) with peripheral artery disease who underwent EVT for aortoiliac occlusive disease. The patients were dichotomized into 2 groups based on serum lipoprotein(a) levels ≤40 mg/dL (LOW; n=135) or >40 mg/dL (HIGH; n=54). After EVT, the incidences of major adverse limb events (MALE) were analyzed. Predictors of MALE were sought with a Cox proportional hazards analysis; results are presented as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

At the median follow-up of 33 months (interquartile range 11, 54), MALE occurred in 44 (23.3%) patients. The MALE-free survival estimate was significantly lower in patients in the HIGH group (55.6% vs 85.2%, p<0.001). Independent predictors of MALE after EVT were hemodialysis (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.78, p=0.039) and high lipoprotein(a) levels (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.44 to 5.45, p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

High lipoprotein(a) levels were associated with a higher incidence of MALE after EVT for patients with aortoiliac lesions.

The relationship between Lp(a) and CVD outcomes: a systematic review

Robust associations between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and CVD outcomes among general populations have been published in previous studies. However, associations in high risk primary prevention and secondary prevention populations are less well defined. In order to investigate this further, a systematic review was performed including prospective studies, which assessed the relationship between Lp(a) and CVD outcomes using multivariable analyses. Additional information was gathered on Lp(a) assays, multivariable modelling and population characteristics. Literature searches from inception up to December 2015 retrieved 2850 records. From these 60 studies were included. Across 39 primary prevention studies in the general population (hazard ratios ranged from 1.16 to 2.97) and seven high risk primary prevention studies (hazard ratios ranged from 1.01 to 3.7), there was evidence of a statistically significant relationship between increased Lp(a) and an increased risk of future CVD. Results in 14 studies of secondary prevention populations were also suggestive of a modest statistically significant relationship (hazard ratios ranged from 0.75 to 3.7).Therefore current evidence would suggest that increased Lp(a) levels are associated with modest increases in the risk of future CVD events in both general and higher risk populations. However, further studies are required to confirm these findings.

[Lipoprotein(a): influence on cardiovascular manifestation]

The clinical relevance of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) as a cardiovascular risk factor is currently underestimated. The aim of our study was to assess the influence of increased Lp(a) values on the development and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD).In our retrospective analysis of 31,274 patients, who were hospitalized for the first time, we compared patients with isolated increased Lp(a) (> 110 mg/dl) and normal Lp(a) (< 30 mg/dl), with increased Lp(a) concentrations (30-60 mg/dl, 61-90 mg/dl, 91-110 mg/dl), and in a third analysis with additionally increased LDL cholesterol and HbA1c values.Patients with high Lp(a) levels showed a significantly higher incidence of advanced CAD with a three-vessel disease being present in 50.2 vs. 25.1 %. Patients with high Lp(a) levels had a significantly more frequent history of myocardial infarction (34.6 vs. 16.6 %, p < 0.001), surgical myocardial revascularization (40.8 vs. 20.8 %, p < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (55.3 vs. 33.6 %, p < 0.001). In addition, there was a marked difference in gender to the disadvantage of male patients regarding development and severity of CAD. CAD risk (Odds ratio) was increased 5.5-fold in patients with Lp(a) ≥ 110 mg/dl. Additionally elevated LDL and HbA1c levels were not associated with increased manifestation and severity of CAD.High Lp(a) concentration leads to an increased manifestation and severity of coronary artery disease. Additional risk factors do not aggravate manifestation of CAD.

Impact of lipoprotein(a) as residual risk on long-term outcomes in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention

Cardiovascular risk remains uncertain in patients with cardiovascular disease despite achieving target lipid levels. Serum levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] can be risk factors for adverse events. The aim of this study was to determine the role of Lp(a) as a residual risk factor in patients who achieve target lipid levels by the time of treatment by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 3,508 patients were treated by PCI from 1997 to 2011 at our institution. Among them, we analyzed consecutive 569 patients who achieved target lipid levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dl, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥40 mg/dl, and triglycerides <150 mg/dl at PCI. A total of 411 eligible patients were assigned to groups according to Lp(a) levels of ≥30 mg/dl (high Lp(a); n = 119) or <30 mg/dl (low Lp(a); n = 292). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and acute coronary syndrome. The median follow-up period was 4.7 years. Cumulative event-free survival was significantly worse for the group with high Lp(a) than with low Lp(a) group (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis selected a high Lp(a) level as an independent predictor of primary outcomes (hazard ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 2.70, p = 0.04). In conclusion, a high Lp(a) value (≥30 mg/dl) could be associated with a poor prognosis after PCI even for patients who achieved target lipid levels.

Lipoprotein(a) concentration and the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and nonvascular mortality

CONTEXT

Circulating concentration of lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]), a large glycoprotein attached to a low-density lipoprotein-like particle, may be associated with risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship of Lp(a) concentration with risk of major vascular and nonvascular outcomes.

STUDY SELECTION

Long-term prospective studies that recorded Lp(a) concentration and subsequent major vascular morbidity and/or cause-specific mortality published between January 1970 and March 2009 were identified through electronic searches of MEDLINE and other databases, manual searches of reference lists, and discussion with collaborators.

DATA EXTRACTION

Individual records were provided for each of 126,634 participants in 36 prospective studies. During 1.3 million person-years of follow-up, 22,076 first-ever fatal or nonfatal vascular disease outcomes or nonvascular deaths were recorded, including 9336 CHD outcomes, 1903 ischemic strokes, 338 hemorrhagic strokes, 751 unclassified strokes, 1091 other vascular deaths, 8114 nonvascular deaths, and 242 deaths of unknown cause. Within-study regression analyses were adjusted for within-person variation and combined using meta-analysis. Analyses excluded participants with known preexisting CHD or stroke at baseline.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Lipoprotein(a) concentration was weakly correlated with several conventional vascular risk factors and it was highly consistent within individuals over several years. Associations of Lp(a) with CHD risk were broadly continuous in shape. In the 24 cohort studies, the rates of CHD in the top and bottom thirds of baseline Lp(a) distributions, respectively, were 5.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4-5.9) per 1000 person-years and 4.4 (95% CI, 4.2-4.6) per 1000 person-years. The risk ratio for CHD, adjusted for age and sex only, was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.11-1.22) per 3.5-fold higher usual Lp(a) concentration (ie, per 1 SD), and it was 1.13 (95% CI, 1.09-1.18) following further adjustment for lipids and other conventional risk factors. The corresponding adjusted risk ratios were 1.10 (95% CI, 1.02-1.18) for ischemic stroke, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.98-1.05) for the aggregate of nonvascular mortality, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.97-1.04) for cancer deaths, and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.95-1.06) for nonvascular deaths other than cancer.

CONCLUSION

Under a wide range of circumstances, there are continuous, independent, and modest associations of Lp(a) concentration with risk of CHD and stroke that appear exclusive to vascular outcomes.

Relationship of oxidized phospholipids on apolipoprotein B-100 particles to race/ethnicity, apolipoprotein(a) isoform size, and cardiovascular risk factors: results from the Dallas Heart Study

BACKGROUND

Elevated levels of oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) on apolipoprotein B-100 particles (OxPL/apoB) are associated with cardiovascular disease and predict new cardiovascular events. Elevated lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels are a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in whites and also in blacks if they carry small apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoforms. The relationship of OxPL/apoB levels to race/ethnicity, cardiovascular risk factors, and apo(a) isoforms is not established.

METHODS AND RESULTS

OxPL/apoB levels were measured in 3481 subjects (1831 black, 1047 white, and 603 Hispanic subjects) in the Dallas Heart Study and correlated with age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, and Lp(a) and apo(a) isoforms. Significant differences in OxPL/apoB levels were noted among racial/ethnic subgroups, with blacks having the highest levels compared with whites and Hispanics (P<0.001 for each comparison). OxPL/apoB levels generally did not correlate with age, sex, or risk factors. In the overall cohort, OxPL/apoB levels strongly correlated with Lp(a) (r=0.85, P<0.001), with the shape of the relationship demonstrating a "reverse L" shape for log-transformed values. The highest correlation was present in blacks, followed by whites and Hispanics; was dependent on apo(a) isoform size; and became progressively weaker with larger isoforms. The size of the major apo(a) isoform (number of kringle type IV repeats) was negatively associated with OxPL/apoB (r=-0.49, P<0.001) and Lp(a) (r=-0.61, P<0.001) regardless of racial/ethnic group. After adjustment for apo(a) isoform size, the relationship between OxPL/apoB and Lp(a) remained significant (r=0.67, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

OxPL/apoB levels vary according to race/ethnicity, are largely independent of cardiovascular risk factors, and are inversely associated with apo(a) isoform size. The association of OxPL with small apo(a) isoforms, in which a similar relationship is present among all racial/ethnic subgroups despite differences in Lp(a) levels, may be a key determinant of cardiovascular risk.

New Insights Into the Role of Lipoprotein(a)-Associated Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A 2 in Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Disease

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] plays an important role in atherosclerosis. The biological effects of Lp(a) have been attributed either to apolipoprotein(a) or to its low-density lipoprotein-like particle. Lp(a) contains platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase, an enzyme that exhibits a Ca 2+ -independent phospholipase A 2 activity and is complexed to lipoproteins in plasma; thus, it is also referred to as lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A 2 . Substrates for lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A 2 include phospholipids containing oxidatively fragmented residues at the sn-2 position (oxidized phospholipids; OxPLs). OxPLs may play important roles in vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. Plasma levels of OxPLs present on apolipoprotein B-100 particles (OxPL/apolipoprotein B) are correlated with coronary artery, carotid, and peripheral arterial disease. Furthermore, OxPL/apolipoprotein B levels in plasma are strongly correlated with Lp(a) levels, are preferentially sequestered on Lp(a), and thus are potentially subjected to degradation by the Lp(a)-associated lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A 2 . The present review article focuses specifically on the characteristics of the lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A 2 associated with Lp(a) and discusses the possible role of this enzyme in view of emerging data showing that OxPLs in plasma are preferentially sequestered on Lp(a) and may significantly contribute to the increased atherogenicity of this lipoprotein.

Lipoprotein (a): A link between thrombogenesis and atherogenesis

Introduction It is well known that numerous mechanisms of thrombogenesis can participate in every stage of atherosclerotic disease. The discovery of Lp(a) lipoprotein and its structural similarity with plasminogen suggests another pathogenic link between atherogenesis and thrombogenesis. Some characteristics of Lp(a) lipoprotein This lipoprotein is present in the whole human population in a wide range of plasma concentrations. It has numerous different isoforms. Its synthesis occurs in the liver, but it is practically metabolically independent from other lipoproteins. Today, Lp(a) lipoprotein is considered to be an independent risk factor for heart and brain ischemic disease. Fibrinolytic mechanisms The primary role of the fibrinolytic mechanism is to prevent thrombus formation during circulation and to remove already formed ones. Plasmin has a central role in this process, due to the inactive proenzyme plasminogen. Its basic activators are tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and urokinase plasminogen activator (u-PA). The most important inhibitors of plasminogen are alpha2-antiplasmin and plasminogen activator inhibitors 1 and 2 (PAI-1 and PAI-2). Structural similarity of Lp(a) and plasminogen The apo(a) and plasminogen genes are very closely linked on the long arm of chromosome 6. Because of that they are structuraly very similar and they have a cross immunological reactivity. Their common elements are so-called "kringle" structures. The key difference in structure of Lp(a) and plasminogen is replacement of Arg with Ser at position 560. This prevents splitting of apo(a) by plasminogen activators. Lp(a) and fibrinolysis Lp(a) lipoprotein inhibits activation of plasminogen by streptokinase. It is also a competitive inhibitor of plasminogen for its binding to plasminogen receptors. Furthermore, it successfully achieves competitive inhibition of plasminogen for binding to tetranectin and thrombospondin. Also, Lp(a) inhibits activation of transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha). It positively correlates with PAI-1 and it is assumed that it promotes release of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) from endothelial cell surfaces. Conclusion In regulation of the hemostatic system via apolipoprotein(a) antifibrinolytic effects, Lp(a) lipoprotein offers a molecular solution to the link between thrombogenesis and atherogenesis.

Associations between apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein AI, the apolipoprotein B/AI ratio and coronary heart disease: a literature-based meta-analysis of prospective studies

OBJECTIVES

To assess associations of circulating levels of apolipoprotein (apo) AI, apoB and the apoB/AI ratio (apoB/A) with risk of incident coronary heart disease (CHD).

DESIGN

Literature-based meta-analysis of prospective studies.

DATA SOURCES

Prospective studies in essentially general populations that reported on associations between apoAI, apoB or apoB/A and first incident CHD outcomes. Studies were identified by computer-based searches and by manual searches of the relevant literature.

RESULTS

Data from 23 relevant studies were identified. For apoAI, with 6333 CHD cases in 21 studies, comparison of individuals in the bottom third with those in the top third of baseline values yielded a combined relative risk of 1.62 (95% confidence interval: 1.43-1.83), i.e. an inverse association. For apoB, a combined analysis of 6320 CHD cases from 19 studies gave a relative risk of 1.99 (1.65-2.39) for a comparison of individuals in the top third versus those in the bottom third of baseline values. For apoB/A, with 3730 CHD cases from seven studies, a comparison of individuals in the top third versus the bottom third of baseline values gave a combined relative risk of 1.86 (1.55-2.22). These associations were somewhat stronger following correction for within-person variations in apolipoprotein levels. There was evidence of heterogeneity amongst the published studies, but it was only partly explained by available study-level characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

The present quantitative review suggests the existence of moderately strong associations between baseline levels of each of apoAI, apoB, and apoB/A and risk of CHD. More detailed analysis, perhaps based on individual participant data from prospective studies, could help to overcome several limitations in the present review and to clarify any relevance of these apolipoproteins to disease prediction and aetiology.

T wave abnormalities, high body mass index, current smoking and high lipoprotein (a) levels predict the development of major abnormal Q/QS patterns 20 years later. A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Most studies on risk factors for development of coronary heart disease (CHD) have been based on the clinical outcome of CHD. Our aim was to identify factors that could predict the development of ECG markers of CHD, such as abnormal Q/QS patterns, ST segment depression and T wave abnormalities, in 70-year-old men, irrespective of clinical outcome.

METHODS

Predictors for development of different ECG abnormalities were identified in a population-based study using stepwise logistic regression. Anthropometrical and metabolic factors, ECG abnormalities and vital signs from a health survey of men at age 50 were related to ECG abnormalities identified in the same cohort 20 years later.

RESULTS

At the age of 70, 9% had developed a major abnormal Q/QS pattern, but 63% of these subjects had not been previously hospitalized due to MI, while 57% with symptomatic MI between age 50 and 70 had no major Q/QS pattern at age 70. T wave abnormalities (Odds ratio 3.11, 95% CI 1.18-8.17), high lipoprotein (a) levels, high body mass index (BMI) and smoking were identified as significant independent predictors for the development of abnormal major Q/QS patterns. T wave abnormalities and high fasting glucose levels were significant independent predictors for the development of ST segment depression without abnormal Q/QS pattern.

CONCLUSION

T wave abnormalities on resting ECG should be given special attention and correlated with clinical information. Risk factors for major Q/QS patterns need not be the same as traditional risk factors for clinically recognized CHD. High lipoprotein (a) levels may be a stronger risk factor for silent myocardial infarction (MI) compared to clinically recognized MI.

Quo vadis haemapheresis. Current developments in haemapheresis

The techniques of haemapheresis originated in the development of centrifugal devices separating cells from plasma and later on plasma from cells. Subsequently membrane filtration was developed allowing for plasma-cell separation. The unspecificity of therapeutic plasma exchange led to the development of secondary plasma separation technologies being specific, semi-selective or selective such as adsorption, filtration or precipitation. In contrast on-line differential separation of cells is still under development. Whereas erythrocytapheresis, granulocytapheresis, lymphocytapheresis and stem cell apheresis are technically advanced, monocytapheresis may need further improvement. Also, indications such as erythrocytapheresis for the treatment of polycythaemia vera or photopheresis though being clinically effective and of considerable importance for an appropriate disease control are to some extent under debate as being either too costly or without sufficient understanding of the mechanism. Other forms of cell therapy are under development. Rheohaemapheresis as the most advanced technology of extracorporeal haemorheotherapy is a rapidly developing approach contributing to the treatment of microcirculatory diseases and tissue repair. Whereas the control of a considerable number of (auto-) antibody mediated diseases is beyond discussion, the indication of apheresis therapy for immune complex mediated diseases is quite often still under debate. Detoxification for artificial liver support advanced considerably during the last years, whereas conclusions on the efficacy of septicaemia treatment are debatable indeed. LDL-apheresis initiated in 1981 as immune apheresis is well established since 24 years, other semi-selective or unspecific procedures, allowing for the elimination of LDL-cholesterol among other plasma components are also being used. Correspondingly Lp(a) apheresis is available as a specific, highly efficient elimination procedure superior to techniques which also eliminate Lp(a). Quality control systems, more economical technologies as for instance by increasing automation, influencing the over-interpretation of evidence based medicine especially in patients with rare diseases without treatment alternative, more insight into the need of controlled clinical trials or alternatively improved diagnostic procedures are among others tools ways to expand the application of haemapheresis so far applied in cardiology, dermatology, haematology, immunology, nephrology, neurology, ophthalmology, otology, paediatrics, rheumatology, surgery and transfusion medicine.

A comparison of the PROCAM and Framingham point-scoring systems for estimation of individual risk of coronary heart disease in the Second Northwick Park Heart Study

We have compared the predictive value of the PROCAM and Framingham risk algorithms in healthy UK men from the Second Northwick Park Heart Study (NPHS-II) (50-64 years at entry), followed for a median of 10.8 years for coronary heart disease (CHD) events. For PROCAM, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.59-0.67), and not significantly different (p = 0.46) from the Framingham score, 0.62 (0.58-0.66). Sensitivities for a 5% false-positive rate (DR(5)) were 13.8 and 12.4%, respectively. Calibration analysis for PROCAM gave a ratio of observed to expected events of 0.46 (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, p < 0.0001) and 0.47 for Framingham (p < 0.0001). Using measures taken at 5 years of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and (estimated) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels increased the ROC by only 1%. An NPHS-II risk algorithm, developed using a 50% random subset, and including age, triglyceride, total cholesterol, smoking status, and systolic blood pressure at recruitment, gave an ROC of 0.64 (0.58-0.70) with a DR(5) of 10.7% when applied to the second half of the data. Adding family history and diabetes increased the DR(5) to 18.4% (p = 0.28). Adding lipoprotein(a) >26.3 mg/dL (relative risk 1.6, 1.1-2.4) gave a DR(5) of 15.5% (p = 0.55), while adding fibrinogen levels (relative risk for 1S.D. increase = 1.5, 1.1-2.0) had essentially no additional impact (DR(5) = 16.9%, p = 0.95). Thus, the PROCAM algorithm is marginally better as a risk predictor in UK men than the Framingham score, but both significantly overestimate risk in UK men. The algorithm based on NPHS-II data performs similarly to those for PROCAM and Framingham with respect to discrimination, but gave an improved ratio of observed to expected events of 0.80 (p = 0.01), although no score had a high sensitivity. Any novel factors added to these algorithms will need to have a major impact on risk to increase sensitivity above that given by classical risk factors.

[New aspects of normolipidemic dyslipoproteinemias]

INTRODUCTION

Normolipidemic dislipoproteinemias include various disorders of different lipoproteins, of their subfractions or some apolipo-proteins, of primary or secondary origin, which are widespread among general population and, like hyperlipoproteinemias, they are associated with the risk for premature atherosclerosis.

DECREASED LEVEL OF HDL CHOLESTEROL

It is a primary, familial hypoalphalipoproteinemia, which is commonly associated with obesity, diet rich in carbohydrates, decreased physical activity and excessive use of coffee and some drugs.

HYPERAPOBETALIPOPROTEINEMIA

It is characterized by increase of apo B-100 in LDL particles, most probably as a consequence of increased hepatic synthesis. Apolipoprotein E isoforms ApoE4 isoform is associated with elevated LDL-cholesterol concentration due to rapid IDL to LDL conversion.

ELECTROPHORETIC DISORDERS

The most important is the latent type IV (pre-beta) or IVb (pre-beta1) with decreased VLDL clearance.

PROLONGED POSTPRANDIAL LIPEMIA

It is common in obesity, NIDDM and coronary heart disease, as an independent risk factor for premature atherosclerosis.

INCREASED OXIDATIVE MODIFICATION OF THE LDL AND HDL PARTICLES

Oxidatively modified LDL may have a key role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and oxidative modification of HDL reduces its transport capacity and its inhibition of LDL oxidation. INCREASED LEVEL OF LP(A) Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for premature atherosclerosis, primarily in young and middle-aged men, in persons with elevated global cardiovascular risk factor profile, decreased HDL-cholesterol, and hypertension. The risk is smaller in persons taking hypocholesterolemic drugs. Also, it is elevated in NIDDM, hypothyroidism and kidney disease.

A dietary pattern derived to explain biomarker variation is strongly associated with the risk of coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

In previous studies, dietary patterns were derived in different populations without regard to a specific outcome.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to apply a new statistical method to construct a specific dietary pattern that is strongly associated with the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD).

DESIGN

We applied reduced rank regression to a sample of 200 cases and 255 controls from the Coronary Risk Factors for Atherosclerosis in Women (CORA) Study. The CAD-specific dietary pattern was constructed by choosing intake data for 49 food groups as predictors and 5 established biomarkers for CAD as responses.

RESULTS

A high score for the constructed dietary pattern was characterized by high intakes of meat, margarine, poultry, and sauce and low intakes of vegetarian dishes, wine, vegetables, and whole-grain cereals. After adjustment for known CAD risk factors, the relative risks from the lowest to the highest quintiles of the pattern score were 1.0, 1.1, 3.6, 6.2, and 12.3 (95% CI: 4.9, 30.9; P for trend < 0.0001). There was an approximate 4.5-fold difference in C-reactive protein and a 2-fold difference in C-peptide between the highest and lowest score quintiles of the study population. HDL-cholesterol concentrations ranged from 70 mg/dL in the lowest quintile to 49 mg/dL in the highest quintile of dietary pattern score.

CONCLUSION

The new statistical method, reduced rank regression, may be a useful tool for identifying dietary patterns that simultaneously affect the concentrations of known CAD biomarkers and the risk of developing CAD.

Plasma lipoprotein Lp(a), markers of haemostasis and inflammation, and risk and severity of coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

Elevated plasma (Lp(a)) levels may represent an independent risk factor for atherothrombotic complications but the relation between Lp(a) levels and the extent of coronary artery disease (CHD) has been discussed controversially. Little is known about potential atherothrombogenic mechanisms of Lp(a).

DESIGN

Case-control study.

METHODS

We assessed the relationship between plasma Lp(a) and angiographically defined CHD, evaluating the severity of coronary atherosclerosis by three different scores. A total of 312 patients with stable angina aged 40-68 years with at least one coronary stenosis > 50% were studied. A group of 479 voluntary blood donors matched for age and sex served as controls. A complete lipid profile and a large number of markers of coagulation, fibrinolysis and inflammation were measured.

RESULTS

Plasma levels of Lp(a) were significantly higher in patients (14.8 mg/dl; 5.4-47.1 mg/dl; median/interquartile range) than in controls (9.7 mg/dl; 3.5-25.3) (P<0.0001). In a logistic regression model, the fully adjusted Odds Ratio for CHD was 3.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-5.6, P<0.0001) for patients in the upper quartile of the Lp(a) distribution compared to the bottom quartile. There was no appreciable association between Lp(a) and apolipoproteins, markers of haemostasis, fibrinolysis and inflammation and the severity of CHD.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that elevated plasma Lp(a) levels may be an independent risk factor for CHD but unrelated to the severity and extension of CHD. Furthermore, there is no good evidence that the presumed link between Lp(a) and CHD is mediated by increased levels of markers of inflammation, or interference with markers of fibrinolysis or coagulation.

Meat‐Adaptive Genes and the Evolution of Slower Aging in Humans

The chimpanzee life span is shorter than that of humans, which is consistent with a faster schedule of aging. We consider aspects of diet that may have selected for genes that allowed the evolution of longer human life spans with slower aging. Diet has changed remarkably during human evolution. All direct human ancestors are believed to have been largely herbivorous. Chimpanzees eat more meat than other great apes, but in captivity are sensitive to hypercholesterolemia and vascular disease. We argue that this dietary shift to increased regular consumption of fatty animal tissues in the course of hominid evolution was mediated by selection for "meat-adaptive" genes. This selection conferred resistance to disease risks associated with meat eating also increased life expectancy. One candidate gene is apolipoprotein E (apoE), with the E3 allele evolved in the genus Homo that reduces the risks for Alzheimer's and vascular disease, as well as influencing inflammation, infection, and neuronal growth. Other evolved genes mediate lipid metabolism and host defense. The timing of the evolution of apoE and other candidates for meat-adaptive genes is discussed in relation to key events in human evolution.

Predictors of adverse long-term outcome in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: with special reference to the admission concentration of lipoprotein (a)

The predictive values for long-term outcome in 127 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after successful primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) were prospectively investigated in the present study. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal AMI, and recurrent angina. Follow-up angiography was performed in 120 patients to assess restenosis. The primary endpoint occurred in 21 patients during a follow-up period of 35+/-24 months. These patients had a higher lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration (p=0.0105) and more prevalence of multivessel disease (p=0.0028) than the other patients. The subjects were divided into 2 groups at the 75th percentile Lp(a) value: group A had an Lp(a) concentration >or=47 mg/dl and group B <47 mg/dl. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a lower cardiac event-free survival rate in group A (p=0.0007) and in patients with multivessel disease (p=0.001). In Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, an Lp(a) level >or=47 mg/dl (relative risk[RR] 5.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-15.0, p=0.0007) and multivessel disease (RR 5.3, 95% CI 2.0-13.7, p=0.0006) were independent predictors of the primary endpoint. An elevated Lp(a) concentration on admission and multivessel disease are significant predictors for long-term adverse outcome in AMI patients treated by primary PTCA.

Relationship of lipoprotein(a) with intimal medial thickness of the carotid artery in Type 2 diabetic patients in south India

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the association of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels with intimal medial thickness (IMT) in Type 2 diabetic patients in south India.

STUDY DESIGN

We studied 587 consecutive Type 2 diabetic patients at the M.V. Diabetes Specialities Centre, Chennai. The mean age of the study group was 55 +/- 10 years and 71.2% were males. IMT of the right common carotid artery was determined using high-resolution B mode ultrasonography. Lp(a) levels were measured using ELISA. Since the frequency distribution of Lp(a) was skewed, Lp(a) values were log transformed and the geometric mean was used for statistical analysis. The tertiles of IMT were determined to analyse the association of Lp(a) and other factors with IMT.

RESULT

The mean Lp(a) level in the study patients was 18.9 +/- 3.1 mg/dl (geometric mean +/- sd) and the mean IMT of the study subjects was 0.93 +/- 0.19 mm (mean +/- sd). The prevalence of carotid atherosclerosis (defined as IMT > 1.1 mm) among subjects with elevated Lp(a) levels > 20 mg/dl was significantly higher compared with those with Lp(a) levels </= 20 mg/dl (26.9% vs. 16.3%, P = 0.003). Lp(a) levels increased with increase in tertiles of IMT (anova, P < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis of carotid IMT with other cardiovascular risk factors revealed strong correlation of IMT with age (P < 0.0001), duration of diabetes (P < 0.0001), systolic blood pressure (P < 0.0001), diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.006), LDL-cholesterol (P = 0.023), HbA1c (P = 0.017) and Lp(a) (P < 0.0001). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed age (P = 0.010), LDL-cholesterol (P = 0.032) and Lp(a) (P = 0.021) to be associated with carotid atherosclerosis.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that Lp(a) has a strong association with IMT of carotid arteries in Type 2 diabetic subjects in south India.

Study of apo(a) length polymorphism and lipoprotein(a) concentrations in subjects with single or double apo(a) isoforms

Cardiovascular risk is associated with high lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) concentrations and low molecular weight apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) isoforms. We studied the relationship between these two biological parameters, particularly in subjects expressing two apo(a) isoforms. Plasma Lp(a) was measured by immunonephelometry in 530 unrelated Caucasian patients at high cardiovascular risk, and apo(a) size determined by immunoblotting using a recombinant standard. Two, one, or no apo(a) isoforms were detected in 258, 270, and 2 subjects, respectively. Lp(a) concentrations showed a non-Gaussian distribution, being higher in the 'double band' than in the 'single band' group (median 0.42 vs. 0.11 g/l, p < 0.0005). Apo(a) size distribution was bimodal, with two frequency peaks at 18 kringles (K) and 27 K. Small size apo(a) isoforms were more frequently found in the 'double band' group, where major isoforms were of lower size than minor isoforms (median 20 vs. 27 K). Regression analysis showed that apo(a) gene length accounted for 33% of Lp(a) variation, with a threshold effect at 20 K, no correlation being found over this value. The minor apo(a) isoform did not significantly influence Lp(a) concentration. These data confirm the relationship between apo(a) size and Lp(a) concentration and suggest that the assessment of cardiovascular risk should take into account the threshold effect at 20 K and the absence of influence of the minor apo(a) isoform.

Family history is a coronary heart disease risk factor in the Second Northwick Park Heart Study

We have estimated the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) from family history of CHD (FHCHD) in 2827 healthy European middle-aged men, and explored the extent to which this can be explained by classical and genetic risk factors. Men with FHCHD (obtained by questionnaire) had a hazard ratio of CHD of 1.73 (95% confidence interval: 1.30, 2.31) compared to those without FHCHD; after adjusting for classical risk factors this did not change substantially. Those with FHCHD had 2.3% lower Factor VIIc (p = 0.03) and 1.14% higher systolic and 1.21% higher diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02), with evidence of interaction between blood pressure and FHCHD status on risk (p = 0.01). The risk for those with a positive family history who were also current smokers was 3.01 compared to non-smokers without FHCHD, which is greater than the risk posed by smoking or FHCHD alone (1.96 and 2.05 respectively compared to non-smokers without FHCHD), but not significantly different from a multiplicative model (p-value for interaction 0.33). Allele frequencies for 13 candidate gene variants were not significantly different between those with and without FHCHD. In those with FHCHD, current smokers who carried the APOE4 allele (e4+) had a hazard ratio of 5.66 compared to non-smokers who had no FHCHD and were not APOE4+, with a significant interaction between smoking and APOE4 in those with FHCHD p = 0.001. These data demonstrate the complex interaction between genetic and environmental factors in determining CHD risk, and suggest that the causes of the familial clustering of CHD remain largely unexplained.

Lipoprotein(a): an emerging cardiovascular risk factor

Lipoprotein(a) is a cholesterol-enriched lipoprotein, consisting of a covalent linkage joining the unique and highly polymorphic apolipoprotein(a) to apolipoprotein B100, the main protein moiety of low-density lipoproteins. Although the concentration of lipoprotein(a) in humans is mostly genetically determined, acquired disorders might influence synthesis and catabolism of the particle. Raised concentration of lipoprotein(a) has been acknowledged as a leading inherited risk factor for both premature and advanced atherosclerosis at different vascular sites. The strong structural homologies with plasminogen and low-density lipoproteins suggest that lipoprotein(a) might represent the ideal bridge between the fields of atherosclerosis and thrombosis in the pathogenesis of vascular occlusive disorders. Unfortunately, the exact mechanisms by which lipoprotein(a) promotes, accelerates, and complicates atherosclerosis are only partially understood. In some clinical settings, such as in patients at exceptionally low risk for cardiovascular disease, the potential regenerative and antineoplastic properties of lipoprotein(a) might paradoxically counterbalance its athero-thrombogenicity, as attested by the compatibility between raised plasma lipoprotein(a) levels and longevity.

Lipoprotein(a) level and lipids in type 2 diabetic patients and their normoglycemic first-degree relatives in type 2 diabetic pedigrees

We investigated alterations of serum levels of Lp(a) and lipid profiles in type 2 diabetic patients and their normoglycemic first-degree relatives to evaluate the potential genetic association among these subjects. Serum Lp(a), triglycerride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), and low density lipoprotein (LDL-C) levels were analyzed in 62 type 2 diabetic patients and 67 normoglycemic first-degree relatives from 29 type 2 diabetic pedigrees, and 45 healthy controls without family histories of diabetes. Dyslipidemia was observed in diabetics and their normoglycemic first-degree relatives. While higher serum TG levels were observed in both type 2 diabetics and their first-degree relatives than those in controls, higher TG levels in diabetics were found when compared with those in first-degree relatives. Meanwhile, lower serum HDL-C levels were observed in both type 2 diabetic patients and their first-degree relatives than those in controls. No significant difference of serum TC and LDL-C levels was found among the three groups. On the other hand, we did not observe significant differences of serum Lp(a) levels between type 2 diabetic patients and normoglycemic first-degree relatives, nor were any significant differences observed between diabetic patients and healthy controls (24.6+/-19.9 vs. 25.8+/-21.2, and 21.3+/-20.5 mg/dl). Although the average serum Lp(a) levels were similar in all subgroups, we did observe a positive correlation of Lp(a) between type 2 diabetic patients and their offspring (r=0.448, P<0.01), suggesting a potential genetic control for Lp(a) levels in type 2 diabetics families.

Laboratory evaluation of hypercoagulability with venous or arterial thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for hypercoagulation testing for patients with venous, arterial, or neurovascular thrombosis, as reflected in the medical literature and the consensus opinion of recognized experts in the field.

DATA SOURCES, EXTRACTION, AND SYNTHESIS

The authors extensively examined the literature and current practices, and prepared a draft manuscript with preliminary recommendations. The draft manuscript was circulated to each of the expert participants (n = 30) in the consensus conference prior to the convening of the conference. The manuscript and recommendations were then presented at the conference for discussion. Recommendations were accepted if a consensus of the 28 experts attending the conference was reached. The discussions were also used to revise the manuscript into its final form.

CONCLUSIONS

The resulting article provides 17 recommendations for hypercoagulation testing in the setting of venous, arterial, or neurovascular thrombosis. The supporting evidence for test selection is analyzed and cited, and consensus recommendations for test selection are presented. Issues for which a consensus was not reached at the conference are also discussed.

The role of non-LDL:non-HDL particles in atherosclerosis

Elevated concentrations of circulating apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins, other than low-density lipoprotein (LDL), have been implicated as causative agents for the development of atherosclerosis. A form of dyslipidemia, the atherogenic lipoprotein profile, that consists of elevated intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL), triglycerides (TGs), dense LDL and dense very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), and low high density lipoprotein-2, occurs in 40% to 50% of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The recently released Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines suggest that because elevated TGs are an independent CAD risk factor, some TG-rich lipoproteins, commonly called remnant lipoproteins, must be atherogenic. Relevant to this series on diabetes, a number of studies have shown that in type 2 diabetes, the severity of CAD is positively related to the numbers of TG-rich particles in the plasma. Although less clear, other studies in type 2 diabetes suggest that elevated levels of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] may also be independently associated with CAD. In this article, we summarize evidence for the role of apoB-containing lipoprotein particles other than LDL in the development of atherosclerosis and discuss methods of quantification and possible pharmacologic interventions for lowering their plasma concentrations. The particles reviewed include the TG-rich lipoproteins: VLDL and its remnants, chylomicron remnants and IDL, and the C-rich lipoprotein: Lp(a).