Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen monitors therapeutic effect and predicts response of bone mineral density

Management of postmenopausal women: Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF) and Groupe d'Etude sur la Ménopause et le Vieillissement (GEMVi) Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The aim of these recommendations is to set forth an individualized approach to the management of early postmenopausal women (i.e., within the first 10 years after natural menopause) covering all aspects of lifestyle and therapeutic management, with or without menopause hormone therapy (MHT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review and consensus of French expert opinion. Recommendations were graded according to the HAS methodology and levels of evidence derived from the international literature, except when there was no good-quality evidence.

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS

The beginning of menopause is an ideal time for each woman to evaluate her health status by assessing her bone, cardiovascular, and cancer-related risk factors that may be amplified by postmenopausal estrogen deficiency and by reviewing her lifestyle habits. Improving lifestyle, including nutrition and physical activity, and avoiding risk factors (notably smoking), should be recommended to all women. MHT remains the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms but it could be also recommended as first-line treatment for the prevention of osteoporosis in early postmenopausal women at low to moderate risk for fracture. The risks of MHT differ depending on its type, dose, duration of use, route of administration, timing of initiation, and whether a progestogen is used. There is reasonable evidence that using transdermal estradiol in association with micronized progesterone or dydrogesterone may limit both the venous thromboembolic risk associated with oral estrogens and the risk of breast cancer associated with synthetic progestins. Treatment should be individualized to each woman, by using the best available evidence to maximize benefits and minimize risks, with periodic reevaluation of its benefit-risk balance. For bothersome genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) symptoms, vaginal treatment with lubricants and moisturizers is recommended as first-line treatment together with low-dose vaginal estrogen therapy, depending on the clinical course. No recommendation of an optimal duration of MHT can be made, but it must take into consideration the initial indication for MHT as well as each woman's benefit-risk balance. Management of gynecological side-effects of MHT is also examined. These recommendations are endorsed by the Groupe d'Etude sur la Ménopause et le Vieillissement hormonal (GEMVI) and the Collège National des Gynécologues-Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF).

[Menopause, menopause hormone therapy and osteoporosis. Postmenopausal women management: CNGOF and GEMVi clinical practice guidelines]

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a frequent clinical condition, which affects nearly 1 in 3 women. Estrogen deficiency leads to rapid bone loss, which is maximal within the first years after the menopause transition and can be prevented by menopause hormone therapy (MHT). Assessment of the individual risk of osteoporosis is primarily based on the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine and femur by DXA. Clinical risk factors (CRFs) for fractures taken either alone or in combination in the FRAX score were shown not to reliably predict fractures and/or osteoporosis (as defined by a T-score<-2.5) in early postmenopausal women. If DXA measurement is indicated in all women with CRFs for fractures, it can be proposed on a case-by-case basis, when knowledge of BMD is likely to condition the management of women at the beginning of menopause, particularly the benefit-risk balance of MHT. MHT prevents both bone loss and degradation of the bone microarchitecture in early menopause. It significantly reduces the risk of fracture at all bone sites by 20 to 40% regardless of basal level of risk with an estrogen-dependent dose-effect. Given the inter-individual variability in bone response, individual monitoring of the bone effect of MHT is warranted when prescribed for the prevention of osteoporosis. This monitoring is based on repeated measurement of lumbar and femoral BMD (on the same DXA measurement system) after 2years of MHT, the response criterion being no significant bone loss. Discontinuation of treatment is associated with a resumption of transient bone loss although there is a large variability in the rate of bone loss among women. Basically, there is a return to the level of fracture risk comparable to that of in untreated woman of the same age within 2 to 5years. Therefore, when MHT is prescribed for the prevention of osteoporosis in women with an increased risk at the beginning of menopause, measurement of BMD is recommended when MHT is stopped in order to consider further management of the risk of fracture whenever necessary (with possibly another anti-osteoporotic treatment).

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS-2020 UPDATE

Objective: The development of these guidelines is sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of the clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols. Results: The Executive Summary of this 2020 updated guideline contains 52 recommendations: 21 Grade A (40%), 24 Grade B (46%), 7 Grade C (14%), and no Grade D (0%). These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world care of patients. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for the Executive Summary recommendations. This update contains 368 citations: 123 (33.5%) evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 132 (36%) EL 2 (intermediate), 20 (5.5%) EL 3 (weak), and 93 (25%) EL 4 (lowest). New or updated topics in this CPG include: clarification of the diagnosis of osteoporosis, stratification of the patient according to high-risk and very-high-risk features, a new dual-action therapy option, and transitions from therapeutic options. Conclusion: This guideline is a practical tool for endocrinologists, physicians in general, regulatory bodies, health-related organizations, and interested laypersons regarding the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis. Abbreviations: 25(OH)D = 25-hydroxyvitamin D; AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ACE = American College of Endocrinology; AFF = atypical femoral fracture; ASBMR = American Society for Bone and Mineral Research; BEL = best evidence level; BMD = bone mineral density; BTM = bone turnover marker; CI = confidence interval; CPG = clinical practice guideline; CTX = C-terminal telopeptide type-I collagen; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; EL = evidence level; FDA = U.S. Food and Drug Administration; FRAX® = Fracture Risk Assessment Tool; GI = gastrointestinal; HORIZON = Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic acid ONce yearly Pivotal Fracture Trial (zoledronic acid and zoledronate are equivalent terms); ISCD = International Society for Clinical Densitometry; IU = international units; IV = intravenous; LSC = least significant change; NOF = National Osteoporosis Foundation; ONJ = osteonecrosis of the jaw; PINP = serum amino-terminal propeptide of type-I collagen; PTH = parathyroid hormone; R = recommendation; ROI = region of interest; RR = relative risk; SD = standard deviation; TBS = trabecular bone score; VFA = vertebral fracture assessment; WHO = World Health Organization.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS - 2016

ABBREVIATIONS

AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists AFF = atypical femur fracture ASBMR = American Society for Bone and Mineral Research BEL = best evidence level BMD = bone mineral density BTM = bone turnover marker CBC = complete blood count CI = confidence interval DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry EL = evidence level FDA = U.S. Food and Drug Administration FLEX = Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) Long-term Extension FRAX_® = Fracture Risk Assessment Tool GFR = glomerular filtration rate GI = gastrointestinal HORIZON = Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly IOF = International Osteoporosis Foundation ISCD = International Society for Clinical Densitometry IU = international units IV = intravenous LSC = least significant change NBHA = National Bone Health Alliance NOF = National Osteoporosis Foundation 25(OH)D = 25-hydroxy vitamin D ONJ = osteonecrosis of the jaw PINP = serum carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I collagen PTH = parathyroid hormone R = recommendation RANK = receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B RANKL = receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand RCT = randomized controlled trial RR = relative risk S-CTX = serum C-terminal telopeptide SQ = subcutaneous VFA = vertebral fracture assessment WHO = World Health Organization.

Emerging concepts in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical care of osteoporosis across the menopausal transition

Bone loss in women accelerates during perimenopause, and continues into old age. To-date, there has been little progress made in stratifying for fracture risk in premenopausal and early postmenopausal women. Epidemiologic data suggests that changes in serum FSH could predict decrements in bone mass during peri- and postmenopause. In bone, FSH stimulates osteoclast formation by releasing osteoclastogenic cytokines. Here, we address the evidence for bone loss across the menopausal transition, discuss strategies for detection and treatment of early postmenopausal osteoporosis, and describe the role FSH plays in physiology and likely in pathophysiology of early postmenopausal bone loss.

Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is the leading cause of fractures in the population older than 50 years. This silent disease affects primarily postmenopausal women and the elderly, and the morbidity and mortality rates are high. The main goal of treating osteoporosis is the prevention of fractures. The identification of populations at risk through early diagnosis and treatment is essential. The last Brazilian guideline for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis was elaborated in 2002. Since then, new strategies for diagnosis and risk stratification have been developed, and drugs with novel action mechanisms have been added to the therapeutic arsenal. The Osteoporosis and Osteometabolic Diseases Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology, in conjunction with the Brazilian Medical Association and other Societies, has developed this update of the guidelines for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis according to the best scientific evidence available. This update is intended for professionals in many medical and health specialties involved in the treatment of osteoporosis, for physicians in general and for health-related organizations.

The use of biomarkers in clinical osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a disease of ascending character in the world population; in this context, bone biomarkers are being increasingly studied in order to aid in the diagnosis and monitoring of these patients. The main objective of this study was a literature review of articles whose main theme was the use of biomarkers for bone formation and degradation, and to evaluate their possible applicability in clinical practice. Literature review was performed through articles indexed and published in the last five years in the PubMed database. The findings of this study showed that most of the previously selected articles were published in the last two years, and the most cited markers were bone resorption, C-terminal collagen telopeptide (CTX), showing the highest correlation with the dynamics of bone, and the biomarker of bone formation, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), which is increased in the event of fracture or may suggest another bone disease. There was an increase in published articles, associating different bone biomarkers and their clinical applicability, especially for treatment control. Our findings suggest that in recent years there has been significant increase in publications evaluating the use of bone turnover biomarkers for bone formation and resorption and their possible clinical applicability, especially in the monitoring of treatment. Still, we believe that further studies need to be conducted to confirm these findings, given the advantages that bone biomarkers can deliver in the clinical management of the disease.

Hormone Therapy Reduces Bone Resorption but not Bone Formation in Postmenopausal Athletes

INTRODUCTION

Independently, hormone therapy and exercise have well-established protective effects on bone parameters. The combined effects of hormone therapy and exercise, however, are less clear. We, therefore, examined the effects of hormone therapy on bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women undergoing regular high intensity exercise.

METHODS

In a randomised, double blind study, postmenopausal athletes competing at Masters level, received either hormone therapy (50 μg transdermal oestradiol, 5 mg MPA, n = 8) or placebo (n = 7) for 20 weeks. Women were tested before and after treatment for plasma concentrations of oestradiol, FSH, LH, and serum bone formation marker -osteocalcin (OC); and urine bone resorption markers-pyridinoline (PYD) and deoxypyridinoline (DPD).

RESULTS

As a result of treatment with hormone therapy there were significant reductions in levels of FSH (73.3 ± 13.7 to 48.6 ± 10.5 mmol/L, p = 0.01) and bone resorption markers (PYD, 81.9 ± 7.7 to 57.8 ± 3.7 nmol/mmol Cr, p = 0.001, and DPD, 18.5 ± 3.1 to 11.8 ± 2.1 nmol/mmol Cr, p = 0.01). Oestradiol and bone formation markers were not significantly altered as a result of hormone therapy. There were no changes to any variables with placebo treatment.

CONCLUSION

Hormone therapy reduced bone resorption, but not bone formation, in postmenopausal athletes. These favorable reductions in bone turnover; therefore, provide an effective treatment in combination with high intensity exercise to further reduce the subsequent risk of osteoporosis and associated fractures.

Quantifying the Balance Between Total Bone Formation and Total Bone Resorption: An Index of Net Bone Formation

CONTEXT

Bone gain vs loss across the skeleton loss depends on the balance between total bone formation and total bone resorption.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine whether resorption and formation markers can be combined to gauge net bone formation across the skeleton.

DESIGN

The study included a cohort followed up across menopause transition (Study of Women's Health Across the Nation).

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling women, 42-52 years old, premenopausal or early perimenopausal at baseline, participated in the study.

OUTCOME

The study included the following measures: 1) bone balance index (BBI) created by estimating the relationship between resorption (urinary N-telopeptide) and formation (osteocalcin) markers when the total formation equals the total resorption in 685 women with stable bone mineral density (BMD) (>5 y before the final menstrual period [FMP]) and applying this relationship to measured bone turnover markers in 216 women beginning to lose bone (≤2 y from FMP); and 2) annualized percentage declines over the following 3-4 years in the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD.

RESULTS

Adjusted for covariates, the BBI was greater (more favorable) in women with a greater body mass index (P = .03) and lower (less favorable) in women closer to the FMP (P = .007). Each SD decrement in BBI was associated with 0.27%/y faster LS BMD decline (P 0.04) and a 38% higher odds of faster-than-average loss of LS bone mass (P = .008, c-statistic 0.76). BBI was not associated with decline in FN BMD. Urinary N-telopeptide alone was not associated with either LS or FN BMD decline.

CONCLUSIONS

An index that quantifies net bone formation vs resorption can be created from bone turnover markers and may help identify individuals at high risk for LS bone loss.

The importance of assessing the rate of bone turnover and the balance between bone formation and bone resorption during daily teriparatide administration for osteoporosis: a pilot study

This study aimed to examine the importance of simultaneously measuring bone formation and resorption markers during daily teriparatide administration. In 135 women with osteoporosis, bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at 0, 24, and 48 weeks after teriparatide administration. Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b were measured at 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks. Subanalyses were performed in groups divided according to the BMD change at 48 weeks (increased and decreased groups), history of fragility fracture (acute and chronic groups), and treatment prior to teriparatide administration (alendronate, raloxifene, and naïve groups). The scatter diagram of multiple of median formation (MoMf) and multiple of median resorption (MoMr) showed that the distribution gradually spread to a high turnover by week 24. A significant correlation was observed between the rate of change in BMD at week 48 and the turnover rate [√(MoMf(2) + MoMr(2))] at week 0. Significant differences were observed in the turnover rate between the acute and chronic groups at weeks 0 and 4 and between the groups divided according to prior treatment from week 0 to 24. Because the assessment of either bone formation markers or bone resorption markers may result in erroneous data, it is necessary to assess them together during teriparatide treatment. The turnover rate at treatment initiation is a useful indicator to predict changes in BMD. When evaluating the turnover rate and balance (MoMf/MoMr), one should consider patient characteristics, including history of fragility fracture and prior treatment.

An Increased Serum N-Terminal Telopeptide of Type I Collagen, a Biochemical Marker of Increased Bone Resorption, Is Associated with Infliximab Therapy in Patients with Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Osteopenia and osteoporosis are considered to be extra-intestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α biologics have been introduced as novel medications for an active IBD. However, it is still not well documented whether anti-TNF-α affects the frequency of bone loss or abnormality of bone mineral markers among patients with IBD.

AIMS

This study was to investigate the biochemical basis of low bone mineral density (BMD) and increased turnover in IBD during infliximab (IFX) therapy.

METHODS

Forty patients with Crohn's disease (CD), 80 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 65 age- and gender-matched controls were included. BMD was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and vitamins K and D were measured as serum undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC) and 1,25-(OH)2D, respectively. Bone formation and resorption were based on measuring bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and serum N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx), respectively.

RESULTS

Significantly lower BMD was found in patients with UC and CD as compared to controls (P < 0.05). BAP, 1,25-(OH)2D, ucOC, and NTx were significantly higher in CD patients, but not in UC patients as compared to controls (P < 0.05). Further, serum NTx level was significantly higher in CD patients who were receiving IFX as compared to CD patients who were not receiving IFX (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A lower BMD and higher bone metabolism markers were found in CD patients as compared to controls or UC patients. A significant increased serum level of NTx, a biochemical marker of increased bone resorption, was observed in CD patients during IFX therapy.

Skeletal-related events and clinical outcomes in patients with bone metastases and normal levels of osteolysis: exploratory analyses

AIMS

High levels of bone resorption markers (e.g. N-telopeptide of type I collagen; NTX) have been correlated with increased risks of skeletal-related events and death in patients with bone metastases from solid tumours. However, the disease course has not been well characterised in patients with bone metastases but normal NTX levels. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the patterns of skeletal morbidity in patients with normal NTX levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Exploratory analyses were carried out on patients with bone metastases from breast cancer, castration-resistant prostate cancer, non-small cell lung cancer or other solid tumours treated with zoledronic acid (ZOL) in phase III trials. The effects of covariates on the relative risk of death were estimated using the Cox proportional hazard model. The prognostic values of covariates were compared between patients with normal (<64 nmol/mmol creatinine) versus elevated (≥64 nmol/mmol creatinine) NTX levels.

RESULTS

Among patients with normal baseline NTX (n = 501), less than 10% developed elevated NTX levels before a skeletal-related event or death during ZOL treatment over 12 months. The prognostic factors identified in these analyses were mostly similar across NTX groups. However, some indicators of aggressive disease (e.g. visceral/cerebral metastases from breast cancer) were associated with poor clinical outcomes only in the normal NTX group.

CONCLUSIONS

Skeletal-related events were generally not preceded or followed by transition to elevated NTX in patients treated with ZOL. Elevated baseline NTX and aggressive extraskeletal disease were independently associated with reduced survival.

Recommendations on the management of fragility fracture risk in women younger than 70 years

The risk for fragility fracture represents a problem of enormous magnitude. It is estimated that only a small fraction of women with this risk take the benefit of preventive measures. The relationship between estrogen and bone mass is well known as they are the other factors related to the risk for fracture. There are precise diagnostic methods, including a tool to diagnose the risk for fracture. Yet there continues to be an under-diagnosis, with the unrecoverable delay in instituting preventive measures. Women under the age of 70 years, being much more numerous than those older, and having risk factors, are a group in which it is essential to avoid that first fragility fracture. Today it is usual not to differentiate between the treatment and the prevention of osteoporosis since the common aim is to prevent fragility fractures. Included in this are women with osteoporosis or with low bone mass and increased risk for fracture, for whom risk factors play a primary role. There is clearly controversy over the type of treatment and its duration, especially given the possible adverse effects of long-term use. This justifies the concept of sequential treatment, even more so in women under the age of 70, since they presumably will need treatment for many years. Bone metabolism is age-dependent. In postmenopausal women under 70 years of age, the increase in bone resorption is clearly predominant, related to a sharp drop in estrogens. Thus a logical treatment is the prevention of fragility fractures by hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and, in asymptomatic women, selective estradiol receptor modulators (SERMs). Afterwards, there is a period of greater resorption, albeit less intense but continuous, when one could utilise anti-resorptive treatments such as bisphosphonates or denosumab or a dual agent like strontium ranelate. Bone formation treatment, such as parathyroid hormone (PTH), in women under 70 years will be uncommon. That is because it should be used in cases where the formation is greatly diminished and there is a high risk for fracture, something found in much older women.

[Laboratory evaluation of bone metabolism index using elecsys 2010.]

BACKGROUND

Bone markers can provide a prognostic information about the risk of osteoporotic fracture and are useful tools for monitoring the efficacy of antiresorptive therapy. We evaluated the analytical performance of the bone markers of Elecsys 2010 (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, USA).

METHODS

We evaluated the analytical performance of the Elecsys 2010 for serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), osteocalcin, and serum bone-derived degradation products of type I collagen C-telopeptide (S-CTX) using control material and patients' specimens. For the comparison studies, an immunoradiometric assay was used for PTH and an ELISA for serum osteocalcin and serum bone-derived degradation products of type I collagen N-telopeptide (S-NTX). We established the reference intervals of S-CTX and serum osteocalcin by analyzing 4569 Korean healthy subjects according to sex and age.

RESULTS

Within-run and total CV of most items were below 5% except S-CTX low level (5.42%). Elecsys 2010 showed a good linearity (r>/=0.99, P<0.01). Good correlations with other methods were found in osteolcalcin (r=0.95, P<0.01) and PTH (r=0.96, P<0.01). S-CTX showed a good correlation with S-NTX (r=0.76, P<0.01). Reference intervals of serum osteocalcin (ng/mL) and S-CTX (ng/mL) were 9.58-33.62 and 0.18-0.89, respectively, in adult male, 8.00-31.46 and 0.11-0.81 in 31-50 years old female, and 8.30-43.50 and 0.11-1.00 in 51-80 years old female.

CONCLUSIONS

Elecsys 2010 bone markers showed a satisfactory precision, linearity, and a good correlation with other methods. With its 'one system-many capabilities' features, Elecsys 2010 would be a useful tool for measuring bone metabolism indices.

Biochemical markers in osteoporosis: usefulness in clinical practice

Currently, the measurement of bone remodeling biomarkers is an innovate proposal in clinical evaluation of patients with osteoporosis. Its use may identify patients at increased risk of fracture as well as monitoring therapeutic efficacy. Because they constitute a relatively inexpensive non-invasive measurement, its use should be widespread for serial and frequent measurements of bone turnover. However, their analytical and biological variability limits their clinical applicability.

Bone turnover markers and bone mineral density response with risedronate therapy: relationship with fracture risk and patient adherence

Surrogate markers of fracture risk--bone turnover markers (BTMs) and bone mineral density (BMD)--can be used to monitor treatment response. We assessed whether changes in these markers greater than the least significant change (LSC) were associated with fracture risk reduction and greater adherence. This secondary analysis of the Improving Measurements of Persistence on ACtonel Treatment (IMPACT) study--a multinational prospective, open-label, cluster-randomized study of postmenopausal women on oral risedronate 5 mg/d for 52 weeks-assessed adherence by electronic monitors. Urinary N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type 1 collagen (uNTX) and serum C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type 1 collagen (sCTX) levels were assessed at baseline and weeks 10 and 22, and BMD at baseline and week 52. Fractures were recorded as adverse events. In 2302 women, responses beyond LSC in BTMs (uNTX and sCTX) and BMD (spine only) were associated with a reduced risk of nonvertebral fractures (NVFs) and all fractures. NVF incidence was about 50% lower in patients with 30% or more of uNTX reduction at week 22 (1.6%) than in those with less than 30% reduction (3.2%, p = .015). NVFs also were reduced in patients with more than 3% spine BMD increase at 52 weeks than those with 3% or less. Responses greater than LSC in BTMs and BMD were associated with greater adherence, but there was no association between adherence and fracture outcomes at 52 weeks. Changes greater than the LSC in BTMs and BMD reflect better treatment adherence, were associated with fracture risk reduction, and identify differences in individual responsiveness to risedronate.

Markers of bone turnover for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment: a need for international reference standards

The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) recommend that a marker of bone formation (serum procollagen type I N propeptide, s-PINP) and a marker of bone resorption (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, s-CTX) are used as reference analytes for bone turnover markers in clinical studies.

INTRODUCTION

Bone turnover markers (BTM) predict fracture risk, and treatment-induced changes in specific markers account for a substantial proportion of fracture risk reduction. The aims of this report were to determine their clinical potential in the prediction of fracture risk and for monitoring the treatment of osteoporosis and to set an appropriate research agenda.

METHODS

Evidence from prospective studies was gathered through literature review of the PUBMED database between the years 2000 and 2010 and the systematic review of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality up to 2001.

RESULTS

High levels of BTMs may predict fracture risk independently from bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. They have been used for this purpose in clinical practice for many years, but there is still a need for stronger evidence on which to base practice. BTMs provide pharmacodynamic information on the response to osteoporosis treatment, and as a result, they are widely used for monitoring treatment in the individual. However, their clinical value for monitoring is limited by inadequate appreciation of the sources of variability, by limited data for comparison of treatments using the same BTM and by inadequate quality control. IOF/IFCC recommend one bone formation marker (s-PINP) and one bone resorption marker (s-CTX) to be used as reference markers and measured by standardised assays in observational and intervention studies in order to compare the performance of alternatives and to enlarge the international experience of the application of markers to clinical medicine.

CONCLUSION

BTM hold promise in fracture risk prediction and for monitoring treatment. Uncertainties over their clinical use can be in part resolved by adopting international reference standards.

Monitoring pharmacological therapy for osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a common disease characterized by low bone strength that increases the risk of fractures. The consequences of fractures include increases in morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Randomized clinical trials have shown that pharmacological therapy can reduce the risk of fractures. In clinical practice, however, failure to achieve optimal therapeutic benefit is common for reasons that include taking medication incorrectly, stopping it prematurely, malabsorption, and the presence of unrecognized diseases or conditions with adverse skeletal effects. Monitoring for anti-fracture effectiveness in individual patients is limited by the absence of clinical tools to directly measure bone strength. It is therefore necessary to monitor therapy with biomarkers such as bone mineral density and bone turnover markers. This is a review of the utility of these tools in the care of individual patients.

Prevalence of bone mineral density abnormalities and related risk factors in an ambulatory HIV clinic population

Bone mineral density (BMD) abnormalities are observed frequently among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Risk factors for reduced BMD in the setting of HIV have been previously studied, but detailed antiretroviral treatment history is often not available. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted between 2005 and 2007 among unselected HIV-infected adults attending an ambulatory urban HIV clinic. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of lumbar spine and femoral neck, full laboratory profile, detailed questionnaire, and antiretroviral history were obtained. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate factors associated with BMD below the expected range for age. Two hundred ninety patients completed the study: 80% Caucasians, 89% males, with median age of 49 yr. Low BMD as assessed by Z-score was present in 19.7% of the patients. By multivariate analysis, only lower body mass index (BMI) was an independent risk factor for low BMD. Cumulative exposure to protease inhibitors, non-nucleosides, and individual nucleoside and nucleotide analogs were not independently associated with low BMD. In conclusion, a 19.7% prevalence of abnormal BMD by DXA scan was identified in an unselected group of HIV-infected adults. Lower BMI was independently associated with low BMD. No correlation was found between abnormal BMD and cumulative exposure to any antiretroviral agents.

The assessment of fracture risk

Bone mineral density is considered to be the standard measure for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and the assessment of fracture risk. The majority of fragility fractures occur in patients with bone mineral density in the osteopenic range. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) can be used as an assessment modality for the prediction of fractures on the basis of clinical risk factors, with or without the use of femoral neck bone mineral density. Treatment of osteoporosis should be considered for patients with low bone mineral density (a T-score of between -1.0 and -2.5) as well as a ten-year risk of hip fracture of > or = 3% or a ten-year risk of a major osteoporosis-related fracture of > or = 20% as assessed with the FRAX. Biochemical bone markers are useful for monitoring the efficacy of antiresorptive or anabolic therapy and may aid in identifying patients who have a high risk of fracture. An approach combining the assessment of bone mineral density, clinical risk factors for fracture with use of the FRAX, and bone turnover markers will improve the prediction of fracture risk and enhance the evaluation of patients with osteoporosis.

NCCN Task Force Report: Bone Health in Cancer Care

Bone health and maintenance of bone integrity are important components of comprehensive cancer care in both early and late stages of disease. Risk factors for osteoporosis are increased in patients with cancer, including women with chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure, those treated with aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer, men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer, and patients undergoing glucocorticoid therapy. The skeleton is a common site of metastatic cancer recurrence, and skeletal-related events are the cause of significant morbidity. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) convened a multidisciplinary task force on Bone Health in Cancer Care to discuss the progress made in identifying effective screening and therapeutic options for management of treatment-related bone loss; understanding the factors that result in bone metastases; managing skeletal metastases; and evolving strategies to reduce bone recurrences. This report summarizes presentations made at the meeting.

Bone turnover markers: understanding their value in clinical trials and clinical practice

While bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is the primary method of determining fracture risk, assessing bone turnover may add valuable information for the management of patients with low bone mass. Bone turnover markers (BTMs) are used in clinical trials where they can provide essential information on the biological efficacy of osteoporosis treatments. In such population-based studies, BTMs can predict fracture risk independent of BMD. When combined with BMD, they improve the fracture risk estimate above and beyond BMD alone in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Since changes in bone turnover after the initiation of therapy with bone resorption inhibitors occur much more rapidly than changes in BMD, treatment efficacy could, in theory, be determined within weeks of using BTMs. However, such predictive value is limited by the large biological variability of these biochemical markers, even though newer automated methods have reduced their analytical variability. Consequently, widespread adoption as a means of predicting treatment efficacy in fracture prevention for individual patients cannot yet be recommended. BTMs may be useful for monitoring adherence to antiresorptive therapy and may aid in identifying patients for whom antiresorptive therapy is most appropriate. Thus, although BTMs are currently confined to clinical research applications, further improvement in assay precision may extend their diagnostic value in clinical settings.

Prediction of changes in bone mineral density in postmenopausal women treated with once-weekly bisphosphonates

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, bone mineral density (BMD) determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry is used to monitor response to osteoporosis therapy. However, 1 to 2 yr are usually required to assess patients' BMD responses. The possibility of earlier indicators of a response or nonresponse to treatment, such as changes in bone turnover markers (BTMs), is of interest to physicians and patients.

METHODS

In this post hoc analysis of women treated with once-weekly bisphosphonates, we examined the association of tertile percentage change from baseline in BTMs at 3 or 6 months and association of several baseline clinical characteristics with 24-month percentage change from baseline in BMD and with percentage of patients showing BMD nonresponse (defined as BMD loss at two or more of four sites) at 24 months. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine which factors were independently associated with BMD nonresponse.

RESULTS

Patients in the tertile with the greatest decrease in each of the BTMs had the greatest mean increase in BMD and the lowest percentage of BMD nonresponders at 24 months. Several characteristics were independently associated with BMD nonresponse, including smaller 3-month reductions from baseline in serum C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen; younger age of menopause; a family history of osteoporosis; and higher baseline trochanteric BMD. Baseline BTMs were not predictive of 24-month BMD response to therapy. The strongest associations were for changes in BTMs with treatment.

CONCLUSION

In groups of patients, short-term changes in markers of bone turnover appear to be predictors of longer term BMD response and nonresponse to bisphosphonate therapy.

The bone marker plot: an innovative method to assess bone turnover in women

BACKGROUND

Biochemical markers of bone turnover reflect the resorptive and reconstructive effects that act on the skeleton. Although elevated markers are commonly interpreted as a sign of an increased turnover rate, the balance between bone resorption and formation is mostly neglected. We introduce a graphic report combining both complementary processes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bone turnover markers were measured in 599 women (aged 25-74 years). To set up reference ranges, 269 from 599 women were selected because of having T-scores > -1 and inconspicuous basic laboratory data. Concentrations of resorption and formation markers were mathematically transformed to build up plots with four fields, symbolizing fast and slow resorption and fast and slow formation processes. The reference data of bone turnover were represented by a 95% confidence ellipse. For individual marker plots, we converted data of bone turnover markers from therapy follow-up profiles of patients in a similar manner.

RESULTS

In pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women (n= 190, 39 +/- 6 years; n= 35, 51 +/- 6 years; n= 44, 55 +/- 5 years, respectively), the medians of the bone resorption marker CrossLaps and of the bone formation markers osteocalcin and aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen were 0.13/0.16/0.22 ng mL(-1), 21/21/25 ng mL(-1) and 36/35/45 ng mL(-1), respectively. In postmenopausal women, the marker plots revealed a shift towards accelerated bone resorption. A discrimination from osteopenic women (n= 138) failed.

CONCLUSION

The proposed marker plot facilitates the intuitive perception of bone turnover in individual patients as well as in patient groups by a synopsis of the balance between bone formation and resorption with the rate of these processes.

Use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

We currently have guidelines that allow us to use bone densitometry in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The role of biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTMs) is less well defined. Serum and urine BTM patterns in treated and untreated osteoporotic patients have been studied to help us define their role. The aim of this review is to present data which helps elucidate the current role and limitation of BTMs in the management of osteoporosis.

METHOD

A search of the literature on BTMs was performed. References with keywords, such as bone turnover markers, biochemical markers, monitoring therapy and monitoring osteoporosis, were used.

RESULTS

Literature describing the nature and limitation of currently available BTMs was reviewed. The clinical use and limitation of BTMs in assessing fracture risk reduction, bone mineral density (BMD) and response to therapy is available, whereas definitive guidelines have not yet been created.

CONCLUSIONS

BTMs offer a potential non-invasive and reliable way of assessing skeletal activity, studying drug effects and response to therapies, assessing fracture risk and predicting other skeletal parameters, such as bone loss, BMD and bone mass. A 30%-70% reduction in bone resorption markers can be achieved with antiresorptive therapy, and 30%-50% increase in bone formation markers with anabolic therapy. We recommend that clinicians understand and incorporate the measurement of BTMs in the management of osteoporosis.

Biomarkers for osteoporosis management: utility in diagnosis, fracture risk prediction and therapy monitoring

Osteoporosis is a systemic disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue, resulting in an increased risk of fracture. While the level of bone mass can be estimated by measuring bone mineral density (BMD) using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), its measurement does not capture all the risk factors for fracture. Quantitative changes in skeletal turnover can be assessed easily and non-invasively by the measurement of serum and urinary biochemical markers; the most sensitive markers include serum osteocalcin, bone specific alkaline phosphatase, the N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen for bone formation, and the crosslinked C- (CTX) and N- (NTX) telopeptides of type I collagen for bone resorption. Advances in our knowledge of bone matrix biochemistry, most notably of post-translational modifications in type I collagen, are likely to lead to the development of new biochemical markers that reflect changes in the material property of bone, an important determinant of bone strength. Among those, the measurement of the urinary ratio of native (alpha) to isomerized (beta) CTX - an index of bone matrix maturation - has been shown to be predictive of fracture risk independently of BMD and bone turnover. In postmenopausal osteoporosis, levels of bone resorption markers above the upper limit of the premenopausal range are associated with an increased risk of hip, vertebral, and nonvertebral fracture, independent of BMD. Therefore, the combined use of BMD measurement and biochemical markers is helpful in risk assessment, especially in those women who are not identified as at risk by BMD measurement alone. Levels of bone markers decrease rapidly with antiresorptive therapies, and the levels reached after 3-6 months of therapy have been shown to be more strongly associated with fracture outcome than changes in BMD. Preliminary studies indicate that monitoring changes of bone formation markers could also be useful to monitor anabolic therapies, including intermittent parathyroid hormone administration and, possibly, to improve adherence to treatment. Thus, repeated measurements of bone markers during therapy may help improve the management of osteoporosis in patients.

Utility of biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density in management of osteoporosis

Biochemical markers of bone turnover (bone-turnover markers) are released during bone formation or resorption and can be measured in blood and/or urine. The concentration of bone-turnover markers in serum or urine reflect bone remodeling activity and can potentially be used as surrogate markers of the rate of bone formation or bone resorption. While the diagnosis of osteoporosis is based on bone mineral density (BMD), the absolute fracture risk for a particular BMD measurement varies several fold depending on age and is also influenced by other clinical risk factors. The measurement of bone-turnover markers may be of additional value to BMD and clinical risk factors in fracture risk assessment by improving the sensitivity and specificity of prediction of future fractures. In clinical practice, bone-turnover markers may help make cost-effective treatment decisions in patients with borderline absolute risk. BMD changes following treatment cannot be detected with confidence for 12-24 months due to measurement imprecision. Bone-turnover markers, which show an early response following treatment, may be useful for monitoring therapy, identifying non-compliance and non-responders, and predicting early response to therapy. This review concludes by identifying the need for internationally agreed-upon standards for bone resorption and formation.

The amino- and carboxyterminal cross-linked telopeptides of collagen type I, NTX-I and CTX-I: a comparative review

Bone diseases such as osteoporosis or bone metastases are a continuously growing problem in the ageing populations across the world. In recent years, great efforts have been made to develop specific and sensitive biochemical markers of bone turnover that could help in the assessment and monitoring of bone turnover. The amino- and carboxyterminal cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX-I and CTX-I, respectively) are two widely used bone resorption markers that attracted great attention due to their relatively high sensitivity and specificity for the degradation of type I collagen, and their rapid adaptation to automated analyzers. However, the clinical performance of both markers differs significantly depending on the clinical situation. These differences have caused considerable confusion and uncertainty. If used correctly, both markers have great potential to improve the management of many bone diseases. We here review the biochemistry, analytical background and clinical performance of NTX-I and CTX-I, as documented in the accessible literature until March 2008.

Higher efficacy of urinary bone resorption marker measurements in assessing response to treatment for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

Osteoporosis has reached epidemic proportions. This situation has stimulated the development of biochemical markers to assist in assessing osteoporotic risk and monitoring treatment efficacy. Biochemical markers for assessing the level of bone resorption have been developed during the last few decades. One of the most widely used bone resorption markers is cross-linked N-terminal telopeptides (NTX). Measurements of urinary and serum NTX provide indications of the level of bone resorption during osteoporosis treatment. However, it remains unclear whether urinary or serum NTX measurements show better efficacy for assessing osteoporosis treatment effects during the early phase of treatment. Therefore, the primary aim of the present study was to compare the efficacies of urinary and serum NTX measurements for assessing the level of bone resorption during the early stage of osteoporosis treatment. We enrolled 43 postmenopausal Japanese women in an open-label randomized placebo-controlled trial. Overall, 21 women in the osteoporosis treatment group and 19 women in the placebo group completed the study. There was a significant reduction in urinary NTX in the treatment group, which was detectable as early as 4 weeks and maintained until 16 weeks, compared with the placebo group. On the other hand, serum NTX did not show a significant reduction in the treatment group compared with the placebo group until 16 weeks. These results indicate that urinary NTX measurements are more sensitive and show higher efficacy than serum NTX measurements for assessing treatment effect during the early phase of osteoporosis treatment in postmenopausal women.

Association between baseline values of bone turnover markers and bone mineral density and their response to raloxifene treatment in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

It has been well established that raloxifene improves bone turnover, increases bone mineral density (BMD), and reduces the risk of fractures. However, it remains obscure which patients are more likely to respond to treatment with raloxifene in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between baseline values of BMD and bone turnover markers (BTMs) and changes of those values after 1-year treatment with raloxifene. Sixty-eight Japanese postmenopausal women with untreated osteoporosis were selected for this study, among whom 58 patients (mean age 70.40 +/- 9.2 years) completed this study. Lower baseline values of BMD at the lumbar spine, the femoral neck, and the distal radius were significantly correlated with greater increases of BMD at those corresponding sites after 1-year treatment with raloxifene. On the other hand, higher baseline values of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and serum N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) were significantly correlated with greater reductions of BAP and NTx, respectively, after 1-year treatment with raloxifene. Although longer and larger studies with fracture endpoints are needed, our findings suggest that baseline values of BMD and BTMs can be used to predict subsequent skeletal response to raloxifene therapy in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Baseline bone morphometry and cellular activity modulate the degree of bone loss in the appendicular skeleton during disuse

Bone is sensitive to the removal of mechanical loading and the severity of unloading-induced bone loss may be influenced by an individual's genotype, gender, and the specific anatomical region. Whether these factors influence bone's mechanosensitivity directly or indirectly through differences in phenotypic baseline bone morphology and cellular activity is unknown. Here, we examined whether indices of baseline bone morphology and cellular activity are associated with the gender- and site-specific susceptibility of bone to unloading. Adult mice (4 months old, BALB/cByJ x C3H/HeJ) were assigned to one of six groups: male and female baseline controls (n=20 each), age-matched controls (n=10 each), or disuse (n=11 males, n=12 females). All baseline controls were sacrificed (0 day) to establish baseline bone morphology with micro-computed tomography (n=10 each gender) or baseline cellular activities using histomorphometry and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining (n=10 each gender). Age-matched control and disuse mice were sacrificed (21 days) to determine disuse-induced bone loss by micro-computed tomography. Following 21 days of unloading, trabecular bone loss in the distal femur and proximal tibia was, on average, 3-fold greater in the metaphyses than in the epiphyses and 2-fold greater in females than in males. Disuse-induced changes in cortical bone were 2-fold smaller than trabecular bone losses and were more apparent in females (5 of 6 regions) than in males (1 of 6 regions). Bone loss was inversely related to baseline bone volume fraction (R(2)=0.51 for females and 0.43 for males) and directly related to baseline bone surface to volume ratio (R(2)=0.69 for females and 0.60 for males). Additionally, trabecular bone loss was correlated with baseline mineral apposition rates and osteoclast surface to bone surface ratios (R(2)=0.86 and 0.46, respectively, genders combined). These data demonstrate that baseline bone morphology and cellular activity modulate bone loss and that, independent of gender, anatomical regions with low bone quantity, high surface-to-volume ratios, and high levels of osteoblastic and osteoclastic activity are particularly susceptible to disuse.

Bortezomib inhibits osteoclast activity in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

The antimyeloma agent bortezomib functions as an inhibitor of nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB. Although NF-kappaB inhibition is predicted to affect osteoclast function, preclinical and clinical studies have primarily reported an effect on osteoblasts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined parameters of bone turnover prospectively in patients with multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib before and after autologous transplantation. Thirty-nine patients received 2 cycles of bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle. After high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 5-week cycle was administered as maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

During posttransplantation bortezomib, decreases in the urinary excretion of collagen N-telopeptide indicated that bortezomib suppresses osteoclast function.

CONCLUSION

The effects on osteoclasts occurred in the absence of bisphosphonate treatment and independently of changes in monoclonal protein levels. Further studies exploring the role of bortezomib as a bone protective agent could be warranted.

Three-month changes in bone turnover markers and bone mineral density response to raloxifene in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

It has been well established that raloxifene (RLX) improves bone turnover, increases bone mineral density (BMD), and reduces the risk of fractures. However, it remains obscure how to monitor the therapeutic effects of RLX, while numerous clinical trials for other antiresorptive agents have suggested that greater short-term reductions of bone turnover markers (BTMs) can predict greater increases in BMD and greater reduction in risk of future fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between short-term reductions of BTMs and subsequent changes of BMD after 1-year treatment with RLX. Seventy-three Japanese postmenopausal women with untreated osteoporosis were selected for this study. Reductions in BTMs [bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) or serum N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx)] after 3 months did not correlate with increases of BMD at any major sites (lumbar spine, femoral neck, total neck, and distal 1/3 radius) either after 6 months or after 12 months. Our results suggest that short-term reductions or 3-month reductions of BTMs with RLX treatment cannot be used to predict increases of BMD. However, this does not directly mean that short-term reductions or 3-month reductions of BTMs with RLX treatment cannot be used to predict risk reduction of future fractures or the ultimate effects of RLX on bone. Further studies with fracture endpoints in longer observation and larger number of patients are warranted to establish how to monitor the therapeutic effects of RLX or early identification of responders or nonresponders to RLX treatment.

Increased cathepsin K and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase expression in bone of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

The effect of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) on bone metabolism was evaluated using the streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rat 1 week after the induction of diabetes. The urinary excretion of cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx) and deoxypyridinoline (Dpd) in diabetic rats increased to 3.6-fold and 1.2-fold the control level, respectively. The amount of hydroxyproline and calcium in the distal femur of diabetic rats significantly decreased to 76% and 90% of the control, respectively. The levels of serum osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in the distal femur of the diabetic rats were significantly reduced to about 40% and 70% of the control levels, respectively. The decrease in the expression osteocalcin was observed in distal femur of the diabetic rats, although the level of ALP mRNA was unchanged. The activity and the mRNA level of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) increased to 1.5- and 2.3-fold the control level, respectively, in distal femur of the diabetic rats. The activity, protein, and mRNA levels of cathepsin K of diabetic rats also elevated to about 2-, 2.3-, and 2-fold the control levels, respectively. These results suggest that IDDM contributes to bone loss through changes in gene expression of TRAP and cathepsin K in osteoclasts as well as osteocalcin in osteoblasts resulting in increased bone resorptive activity and decreased bone formation.

Clinical application of biochemical markers of bone turnover

With the ageing population in most countries, disorders of bone and mineral metabolism are becoming increasingly relevant to every day clinical practice. Consequently, the interest in, and the need for effective measures to be used in the screening, diagnosis and follow-up of such pathologies have markedly grown. Together with clinical and imaging techniques, biochemical tests play an important role in the assessment and differential diagnosis of metabolic bone disease. In recent years, the isolation and characterisation of cellular and extracellular components of the skeletal matrix have resulted in the development of molecular markers that are considered to reflect either bone formation or bone resorption. These biochemical indices are non-invasive, comparatively inexpensive and, when applied and interpreted correctly, helpful tools in the diagnostic and therapeutic assessment of metabolic bone disease. This review provides an overview of the current evidence regarding the clinical use of biochemical markers of bone remodelling in bone disease, with an emphasis on osteoporosis.

Bone mineral density changes over a year in young females with schizophrenia: relationship to medication and endocrine variables

INTRODUCTION

Hyperprolactinaemia is associated with the use of potent dopamine-2 receptor blocking anti-psychotic agents in schizophrenia and with bone loss in the general population. Significantly higher rates of reduced bone mineral density (BMD) have been identified in young pre-menopausal females with schizophrenia receiving prolactin-raising anti-psychotics compared to those receiving prolactin-sparing anti-psychotics. This prospective study compared BMD alterations over a period of 1 year in patients maintained on either prolactin-raising (e.g. risperidone, amisulpride or depot anti-psychotics) or prolactin-sparing (olanzapine) anti-psychotics. The effects of specific interventions to improve BMD were also examined in the context of whether patients were receiving either prolactin-raising or anti-psychotics or Olanzapine.

METHODS

Pre-menopausal females (n=38) with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, who had received exclusively either prolactin-raising (n=25) or prolactin-sparing (n=13) anti-psychotics during their treatment history, had clinical, endocrine and bone marker assessments performed at baseline and every 3 months for a period of 1 year. BMD was measured by DEXA scan at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Patients from both groups either received specific interventions (n=16) or no interventions (n=16) to improve bone density.

RESULTS

There was an overall gain in lumbar BMD values in the prolactin-sparing subgroup, compared to an overall loss in the prolactin-raising subgroup (p=0.02), for the groups that received no specific interventions to improve BMD. Within the group that received specific interventions, the subgroup receiving prolactin-sparing anti-psychotics had a significant increase in lumbar (p=0.01) and hip (p=0.01) BMD over time, whereas alterations in the prolactin-raising subgroup were not significant.

DISCUSSION

Women taking prolactin-raising anti-psychotics and not receiving specific interventions to improve bone density had evidence of ongoing bone demineralisation over a year; whereas women taking prolactin-sparing anti-psychotics had a modest overall increase in BMD. Most clinical interventions appeared to be helpful, but were significantly more effective in those taking prolactin-sparing anti-psychotics.