Accuracy of anticardiolipin antibodies in identifying a history of thrombosis among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Antiphospholipid antibody testing

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are a family of autoantibodies targeting phospholipid-binding proteins and are associated with several clinical settings, and most notably define the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). These antibodies can be identified using a variety of laboratory tests, which include both solid-phase immunological assays and functional clotting assays that detect lupus anticoagulants (LA). aPLs are linked to a range of adverse medical conditions, such as thrombosis and complications affecting the placenta and fetus, potentially leading to morbidity and mortality. The specific aPL identified, along with the pattern of reactivity, correlates with the severity of these conditions. Therefore, laboratory testing for aPL is crucial for evaluating the risk of complications and for fulfilling certain classification criteria for APS, which are also applied as diagnostic markers in medical practice. This review provides an overview of the available laboratory tests currently for measuring aPL and discusses their clinical implications.

Added value of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies in the workup of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) requires persistent presence of lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin (aCL) IgG/IgM, or anti-β2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) IgG/IgM antibodies. Other antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) such as antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) are promising in assessment of thrombotic APS (TAPS).

AIM

To evaluate the added value of aPS/PT IgG and IgM in TAPS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

aPS/PT IgG/IgM, aCL IgG/IgM, aβ2GPI IgG/IgM, and LAC were determined in 757 patients (TAPS and controls). aPS/PT cut-off values were calculated, and aPS/PT titers and positivity were compared between TAPS and controls, type of thrombosis, and antibody profiles. Likelihood ratios (LR), odds ratios (OR), and aPL score were determined.

RESULTS

aPS/PT IgG and IgM were associated with TAPS and triple positivity. In-house calculated cut-offs were higher for IgM (43 units), compared to manufacturer's cut-off (30 units). Thresholds of 90 (IgG) and 200 (IgM) units were determined as high-titer cut-off. Higher aPS/PT titers were observed in triple positive patients and showed higher LR and OR for TAPS. aPS/PT was independently associated with TAPS when adjusted for aCL/aβ2GPI, but not when adjusted for LAC. In isolated LAC positive patients, aPS/PT was positive in 27.1% TAPS patients and in 77.3% patients with autoimmune disease. Diagnostic value of aPL score did not differ with and without including aPS/PT.

CONCLUSION

aPS/PT positivity, especially with high antibody titer, is associated with TAPS diagnosis. Analysis on top of current laboratory criteria is not essential in TAPS diagnosis, but aPS/PT could be useful in patients with thrombosis and a double positive aPL profile (aCL+/aβ2GPI+).

Laboratory Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Insights and Hindrances

Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) requires the presence of a clinical criterion (thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity), combined with persistently circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Currently, laboratory criteria aPL consist of lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) IgG/IgM, and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) IgG/IgM. Diagnosis and risk stratification of APS are complex and efforts to standardize and optimize laboratory tests have been ongoing since the initial description of the syndrome. LAC detection is based on functional coagulation assays, while aCL and aβ2GPI are measured with immunological solid-phase assays. LAC assays are especially prone to interference by anticoagulation therapy, but strategies to circumvent this interference are promising. Alternative techniques such as thrombin generation for LAC detection and to estimate LAC pathogenicity have been suggested, but are not applicable yet in routine setting. For aCL and aβ2GPI, a lot of different assays and detection techniques such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent and chemiluminescent assays are available. Furthermore, a lack of universal calibrators or standards results in high variability between the different solid-phase assays. Other non-criteria aPL such as anti-domain I β2 glycoprotein I and antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies have been suggested for risk stratification purposes in APS, while their added value to diagnostic criteria seems limited. In this review, we will describe laboratory assays for diagnostic and risk evaluation in APS, integrating applicable guidelines and classification criteria. Current insights and hindrances are addressed with respect to both laboratory and clinical implications.

Semiquantitative interpretation of anticardiolipin and antiβ2glycoprotein I antibodies measured with various analytical platforms: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies

BACKGROUND

Antiβ2glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) and anticardiolipin (aCL) IgG/IgM show differences in positive/negative agreement and titers between solid phase platforms. Method-specific semiquantitative categorization of titers could improve and harmonize the interpretation across platforms.

AIM

To evaluate the traditional 40/80-unit thresholds used for aCL and aβ2GPI for categorization into moderate/high positivity with different analytical systems, and to compare with alternative thresholds.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

aCL and aβ2GPI thresholds were calculated for two automated systems (chemiluminescent immunoassay [CLIA] and multiplex flow immunoassay [MFI]) by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis on 1108 patient samples, including patients with and without antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and confirmed on a second population (n = 279). Alternatively, regression analysis on diluted standard material was applied to identify thresholds. Thresholds were compared to 40/80 threshold measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Additionally, likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated.

RESULTS

Threshold levels of 40/80 units show poor agreement between ELISA and automated platforms for classification into low/moderate/high positivity, especially for aCL/aβ2GPI IgG. Agreement for semiquantitative interpretation of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) IgG between ELISA and CLIA/MFI improves with alternative thresholds. LR for aPL IgG increase for thrombotic and obstetric APS based on 40/80 thresholds for ELISA and adapted thresholds for the other systems, but not for IgM.

CONCLUSION

Use of 40/80 units as medium/high thresholds is acceptable for aCL/aβ2GPI IgG ELISA, but not for CLIA and MFI. Alternative semiquantitative thresholds for non-ELISA platforms can be determined by a clinical approach or by using monoclonal antibodies. Semiquantitative reporting of aPL IgM has less impact on increasing probability for APS.

Performance Evaluation and Clinical Associations of Immunoassays That Detect Antibodies to Negatively Charged Phospholipids Other Than Cardiolipin

OBJECTIVES

We evaluate the performance characteristics of antiphosphatidylserine (anti-PS), antiphosphatidylinositol (anti-PI), and antiphospholipid mixture (APhL) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) compared with anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2 glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) in a large group of patients with antiphospholipid (aPL)-related diseases.

METHODS

Serum samples from 548 patients from the Hopkins and Jamaican systemic lupus erythematosus cohorts, the PROMISSE cohort, and the Antiphospholipid Standardization Laboratory were examined for immunoglobulin G (IgG)/immunoglobulin M (IgM) positivity in aCL, anti-β2GPI, anti-PS, anti-PI, and APhL ELISA assays.

RESULTS

All IgG assays were associated with one or more thrombotic and/or obstetric manifestations, with an increased risk associated with higher antibody titers. Analytical performance was similar among assays, but IgG assays performed better than IgM counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing titers of APhL, anti-PS, and anti-PI antibodies could indicate an increased risk of thrombotic and/or obstetric aPL-related manifestations. These assays may be promising biomarkers for particular APS manifestations.

Laboratory diagnosis and management challenges in the antiphospholipid syndrome

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by recurrent arterial and/or venous thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity manifested by early or late losses. Laboratory diagnosis of APS relies on the demonstration of a positive test for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). In clinical practice, the gold standard tests are those that detect anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and/or the lupus anticoagulant (LA). Although other specificities for aPL have been described their clinical utility and standardization has still to be established. Persistence of aPL positive tests must be demonstrated, and other causes and underlying factors considered. Although it is universally recognized that the routine screening tests (aCL and/or LA) might miss some cases, careful differential diagnosis and repeat testing are mandatory before the diagnosis of ‘seronegative APS’ can be made. Correct identification of patients with APS is important, because prophylactic anticoagulant therapy can prevent thrombosis from recurring, and treatment of affected women during pregnancy can improve fetal and maternal outcome.

Further description of early clinically silent lupus nephritis

Thirty silent lupus nephritis (SLN) patients were compared to 16 individuals bearing overt lupus nephritis (OLN). Results included: years of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) diagnosis were significantly earlier (4.6 ± 2.8 years) in SLN than in OLN (7.18 ± 3.61) ( P < 0.05). Neurological compromise, hypertension, normocitic anemia and lymphopenia were significantly prevalent in OLN than in SLN ( P < 0.05). Beside normal urinary sediment and renal function tests, the SLN group showed a moderate increase of both activity (AI) and chronicity (CI) renal pathology index when compared to highly increased AI and CI in OLN ( P < 0.05). Seventy percent of SLN patients were ISN/RPS Classes I (6.6%) and II (63.3%) while 81% of OLN cases were Classes III, IV (37.5%) and V. IgG, IgA, IgM, λchain, C3 and fibrinogen immune deposits were found in 90% or over in both SLN and OLN individuals while in 60% or over, both groups also showed K chain, C1q and C4 deposits. While prevalence of ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies were similar in both groups, anti-histone, anti-RNP, CIC and CH50 serum levels were significantly different in OLN versus SLN ( P < 0.05). We strongly suggest that indeed SLN is the earliest stage in the natural history of lupus nephritis.

Detection of autoantibodies in a point-of-care rheumatology setting

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases are common and confront society with serious medical, social, and financial burdens imposed by their debilitating nature. Many autoimmune diseases are associated with a particular set of autoantibodies, which have emerged as highly useful to define and classify disease, predict flares, or monitor efficacy of therapy. However, current practice for monitoring autoantibodies is protracted, labor-intensive, and expensive. This review provides an overview on the value of point-of-care (POC) biosensor technology in the diagnosis and management of patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Real-time measurement of autoantibodies will clearly benefit the rheumatology practice in emergency and urgent care settings, where definitive diagnosis is essential for initiation of correct critical care therapy. Immediate serological information in clinic will provide considerable value for long-term patient care and an opportunity for an instant, result-deduced therapeutic action, avoiding delays and improving compliance, especially in field-based and remote areas. We describe the particular autoantibodies that are useful disease and activity markers and would, therefore, be attractive to POC applications. Already existing biosensors and platforms that show promise for autoantibody testing are summarized and comparatively evaluated. As POC assessment is gaining momentum in several areas of patient care, we propose that rheumatology is poised to benefit from this innovative and affordable technology.

Utility of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin and IgA antiphospholipid assays in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Currently, 3 antiphospholipid assays are widely used clinically [lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin (aCL), and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (anti-ß2-GPI)]. LAC is the most specific assay, conferring the highest risk of thrombosis and pregnancy loss, but it cannot be validly performed in an anticoagulated patient. We investigated the usefulness of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin (anti-PS/PT) and its association with thrombosis. Anti-PS/PT is strongly associated with the presence of LAC. We also studied the association of IgA antiphospholipid isotypes and specific domains of ß2-GPI with thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Stored samples from patients with SLE, with and without past thrombosis, were assayed for antibodies to the whole ß2-GPI protein (IgG/IgM/IgA), to ß2-GPI domain 1 (IgG), to ß2-GPI domain 4/5 (IgA), aCL (IgG/IgM/IgA), and anti-PS/PT (IgG, IgM, and IgG/M). LAC was detected using the dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) with confirmatory testing.

RESULTS

Anti-PS/PT IgG and IgG/M and anti-ß2-GPI IgG, IgM, and IgA were highly associated with a history of LAC by dRVVT (p < 0.0001). For all thrombosis, of the traditional ELISA assays, anti-ß2-GPI IgA, IgG, and aCL IgA were most associated. Anti-PS/PT IgG and IgG/M had a similar magnitude of association to the traditional ELISA. For venous thrombosis, of the traditional ELISA, anti-ß2-GPI (IgG and IgA), anti-PS/PT (IgG and IgG/M), and aCL IgA were associated. Again, anti-PS/PT (IgG and IgG/M) had the same magnitude of association as the traditional ELISA. For stroke, significant association was seen with anti-ß2-GPI IgA D4/5.

CONCLUSION

In anticoagulated patients, where LAC testing is not valid, anti-PS/PT, either IgG or IgG/IgM, might serve as useful alternative tests to predict a higher risk of thrombosis. Anti-PS/PT antibodies were associated with all thrombosis and with venous thrombosis. IgA isotypes in secondary antiphospholipid syndrome are associated with thrombosis. Anti-ß2-glycoprotein domain 1 was not shown to be associated with thrombosis in SLE.

Clinical manifestations and anti-phospholipid antibodies in 712 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: evaluation of two diagnostic assays

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the agreement and performance of two tests for aPLs with regard to association with manifestations of the APS in patients with SLE.

METHODS

We investigated 712 SLE patients and 280 population controls. Cardiolipin and β(2) glycoprotein-I antibodies were measured with routine ELISA and a new automated method. Three positivity cut-offs (99%, 90% of controls and recommended cut-off by manufacturers) were used. Associations with previous thrombotic events, thrombocytopenia and, in a subgroup of patients, obstetric morbidity (n = 296) were evaluated. Results were compared with the LA test, performed in 380 patients.

RESULTS

Inter-test agreement was moderate (demonstrated by κ-values 0.16-0.71). Performance of the two tests was similar: at the 99th percentile cut-off, sensitivity for any thrombotic event ranged from 3.7% to 24.8%, while specificity was 84.7-97.7%. Regardless of assay, IgG isotypes were associated with venous thrombosis and ischaemic cerebrovascular disease, whereas aPLs of IgM isotype were weakly associated with ischaemic heart disease. Associations were greatly affected by aPL level. LA performed better than the specific aPL tests. LA was associated with any thrombotic event, odds ratio 5.4 (95% CI 3.1, 9.4), while the specific aPL tests ranged from non-significant to an odds ratio of 1.9 (95% CI 1.03, 3.4) using criteria cut-off. LA was also convincingly associated with other APS manifestations.

CONCLUSION

In relation to thrombotic manifestations, there was moderate agreement but no clear advantages when comparing a routine aPL ELISA with an automated method. APL isotype and titre as well as LA positivity are important for risk assessment in SLE patients.

Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus

Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) is the least understood, yet perhaps the most prevalent manifestation of lupus. The pathogenesis of NPSLE is multifactorial and involves various inflammatory cytokines, autoantibodies, and immune complexes resulting in vasculopathic, cytotoxic and autoantibody-mediated neuronal injury. The management of NPSLE is multimodal and has not been subjected to rigorous study. Different treatment regimens include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anticoagulation, and immunosuppressives such as cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methotrexate. For refractory NPSLE, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), plasmapheresis, and rituximab have been used. Adjunctive symptomatic treatment complements these therapies by targeting mood disorders, psychosis, cognitive impairment, seizures or headaches. Several new biological agents are being tested including Belimumab, a human monoclonal antibody that targets B lymphocyte stimulator. This review focuses on the pathophysiology, treatment, and new potential therapies for neuropsychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus.

The clinical relevance of IgA anticardiolipin and IgA anti-β2 glycoprotein I antiphospholipid antibodies: a systematic review

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed in patients with thromboembolic events and/or pregnancy loss in the presence of persistent laboratory evidence for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Diagnostic tests for the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies include laboratory assays that detect anticardiolipin antibodies, lupus anticoagulants, and anti-β(2)-glycoprotein I antibodies. Most studies on aPL have mainly focused on the estimation of the IgG and IgM isotypes, with only a few studies reporting on the pathogenic significance of IgA aPL. In this review we aimed to summarize and analyze the evidence published in the literature on the prevalence and the clinical significance of IgA aPL.

IgA anti-beta2-glycoprotein I autoantibodies are associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

The clinical utility of testing for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) of IgA isotype remains controversial.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

To address this issue, we reasoned that if IgA aPL contribute to the clinical manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome, then an association with thromboembolic events should manifest in patients whose only aPL is of IgA isotype. We performed a retrospective chart review of 56 patients (31 with systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE] and 25 without SLE) whose only positive aPL was IgA anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (isolated IgA anti-beta2GPI) and compared their clinical features with 56 individually matched control patients without any aPL. Patients with isolated IgA anti-beta2GPI had a significantly increased number of thromboembolic events, as compared to controls. When patients were stratified into those with and without SLE, the association between isolated IgA anti-beta2GPI and thromboembolic events persisted for patients with SLE, but was lost for those without SLE. Titers of IgA anti-beta2GPI were significantly higher in SLE patients who suffered a thromboembolic event. Among patients with isolated IgA anti-beta2GPI, there was an increased prevalence of diseases or morbidities involving organs of mucosal immunity (i.e., gastrointestinal system, pulmonary system, and skin).

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

The presence of isolated IgA anti-beta2GPI is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events, especially among patients with SLE. IgA anti-beta2GPI is associated with an increased prevalence of morbidities involving organs of mucosal immunity.

The use of laboratory methods in differential diagnosis and treatment of SLE and antiphospholipid syndrome

The detection of autoantibodies has become an important component in the diagnosis and management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome. Their importance lies in the fact that they are not only markers of the disease and used as part of a diagnostic panel, but many of them also show correlation with disease activity. All antibody testing should be interpreted in the context of the clinical features. The antinuclear antibodies test is an effective screening assay in patients with clinical features of SLE. The combination of antinuclear antibodies test, dsDNA and ENA (Ro, La, Sm, RNP) antibodies help to establish the diagnosis of most patients with SLE. New antibodies, such as antinucleosomes and anti-C1q, appear to be useful for SLE diagnosis, monitoring disease activity and predicting renal flares, particularly in dsDNA-negative patients. Anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant are the tests most commonly used in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome. However, the use of anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I as a routine diagnostic test remains controversial.

IgA antiphospholipid antibodies are an independent risk factor for thromboses

Antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant, anti-cardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies, mostly IgG isotype) are strong risk factors for thrombosis. Because a paucity of information on IgA isotype exists in the literature, we retrospectively evaluated the thrombotic significance of IgA antiphospholipid antibodies. We included 472 patients with clinical information on thrombotic events and complete laboratory work-up for antiphospholipid antibodies syndrome. Odds ratios (OR) of various antiphospholipid antibodies for thrombosis were calculated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Lupus anticoagulant alone was detected in 57 (12%) patients, ELISA-based antibodies (IgG, IgM, IgA) against cardiolipin, phosphatidylserine or β2-glycoprotein-I alone were detected in 131 (28%) patients, whereas 80 (17%) patients had both. Antibody isotype distribution was IgG 32%, IgM 60% and IgA 56%. Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant risk of thrombosis in patients with elevated titres of IgA of any ELISA-based antiphospholipid antibodies (OR 1.77). Stepwise logistic regression (multivariate) analysis identified elevated titres of any ELISA-based IgA antiphospholipid antibodies as an independent risk factor for thrombosis (OR 1.6) in the entire cohort, and in the subgroup of patients without concurrent presence of lupus anticoagulant (OR 1.8). IgA antiphospholipid antibodies appear to be a significant independent risk factor for thrombosis, thereby meriting evaluation in patients with unexpected thrombosis.

Influence of different IgG anticardiolipin antibody cut-off values on antiphospholipid syndrome classification

BACKGROUND

While medium to high titers of anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies, defined as >40 GPL units or >99th percentile, is a laboratory criteria for the 'definite' diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), agreement between the two cut-offs has not been validated.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the current aCL laboratory criterion by verifying the effect of the two cut-offs on APS classification.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Ninety aCL positive APS patients were selected on the basis of their GPL values above the 99th percentile (17.4 GPL), which was calculated by testing 100 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects.

RESULTS

A significant difference in the IgG positivity (P < 0.0001) was found between the APS laboratory profiles as 20 out of the 24 (83.3%) patients with single positivity (aCL alone), six out of the 23 (26.1%) with double positivity (aCL plus lupus anticoagulant or anti-beta(2)glycoprotein I), and none out of the 43 with triple positivity (aCL plus lupus anticoagulant and anti-beta(2)glycoprotein I) had titers between the 99th percentile and 40 GPL units. Moreover, the rate of aCL values between the 99th percentile and 40 GPL units was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in patients with pregnancy morbidity (73.7%) as compared to those with vascular thrombosis (16.9%) and those with both conditions (16.7%).

CONCLUSION

The 99th percentile cut-off level seems more sensitive than the >40 GPL value for APS classification, as it includes subjects with aCL positivity alone as well as patients with pregnancy morbidity.

A protocol for determination of anticardiolipin antibodies by ELISA

The anticardiolipin (aCL) test has been widely used by physicians since the mid-1980s for diagnosing patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Establishment of this diagnosis has enabled effective management of patients with recurrent thrombosis or recurrent pregnancy losses. The test was first established in 1983 as a radioimmunoassay and soon thereafter converted into ELISA. There have been numerous efforts to standardize the aCL test, but precise reproducible measurement of aCL levels is difficult and the use of semiquantitative measurements (high, medium and low) is recommended as this is probably sufficient for clinical diagnosis. Using validated ELISAs for measuring aCL Abs offers greater reproducibility, would reduce interlaboratory variations and limit discrepancies in results between different laboratories. This article details a procedure that takes approximately 2 h and summarizes the information available on the aCL ELISA test.

A re-appraisal of the normal cut-off assignment for anticardiolipin IgM tests

BACKGROUND

Recent reports show an apparent large number of individuals with low to moderate titers of anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA), particularly of the IgM isotype with no clinical signs of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The significance of these results is unknown. This study examined the prevalence of low positive titers of IgM ACA antibodies in a large number (n = 982) of normal blood donors (Group 1) and in a group of 159 individuals > 60 years of age (Group 2). The effect of re-defining the currently used cut-off values for the IgM ACA tests was also examined.

METHODS

IgM ACA antibodies were tested in three ELISA assays: the Bindazyme Anti-IgM Cardiolipin EIA kit (assay A), an 'in-house' ACA test (assay B), and the APhL ELISA kit (assay C).

RESULTS

THE normal range cut-offs were re-calculated using the 95th percentile of the data for Group 1 (12.4 MPL U mL(-1) for assay A, 5.4 MPL U mL(-1) for assay B and 9.5 MPL U mL(-1) for assay C) and Group 2 (9.9 MPL U mL(-1) for assay A, 5.5 MPL U mL(-1) for assay B and 13.2 MPL U mL(-1) for assay C). These values were not significantly different from the current cut-off values for each assay. The prevalence of low positive results in Group 1 relative to the re-defined cut-off for that group were: 1.0%, 1.1% and 0.9% in assay A, B and C; and in Group 2: 0.6%, 0.6% and 0.6%, respectively. An indeterminate zone (between the 95th and 99th percentile) was then established for the two groups. The prevalence in Group 1 was 3.8%, 3.9% and 3.9% for assays A, B and C, respectively, and for Group 2: 4.4% in all three assays.

CONCLUSIONS

The data confirm that the current cut-off point for each of the three assays is correct. We suggest based on this study that the low positive range is re-assigned 'indeterminate' and recommend that samples falling in this category should be retested to confirm positivity at a later date.

Autoantibody Determination in the Diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that usually develops in young women aged 18-50 years and is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies. Diagnosis is difficult as SLE is a great imitator of other diseases. When SLE is suspected clinically in a patient (involvement of two or more organ systems), an initial laboratory evaluation would be antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing. If ANA is negative, SLE is unlikely and results positive at less than 1:40 strongly argue against SLE. Other explanations for organ system involvement should be pursued. Results positive at greater than 1:40 may merit further evaluation for SLE and at times referral to a rheumatologist for a full SLE evaluation. While the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for SLE are primarily a tool for research, they may be useful clinically, in that those patients fulfilling four or more criteria are highly likely to have SLE.

Antiphospholipid Antibody Testing: Which Are Most Useful for Diagnosis?

Laboratory diagnosis of APS relies on the demonstration of a positive test for aPL. In clinical practice, the gold standard tests are those that detect beta2GPI-dependent aCL or LA. The question on the use of anti-beta2GPI asa routine diagnostic test remains unanswered, and testing for these antibodies should be only performed in very selected cases and not as an alternative to aCL or LA testing. Clinical utility and standardization are still lacking for other aPL specificities; therefore, their application as routine diagnostic tools is not recommended.

Clinical manifestations and antiphosphatidylserine antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: is there an association?

OBJECTIVE

Antiphospholipid antibodies are a group of heterogeneous autoantibodies which have been reported in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in association with thrombosis, fetal loss, and thrombocytopenia. In this study, we aimed to reveal the prevalence and correlation of IgG, IgA, and IgM isotypes of antibodies to cardiolipin (aCL) and antiphosphatidylserine (aPS) with clinical and laboratory manifestations of SLE patients.

METHODS

Fifty-nine SLE patients and 41 healthy controls were included. Fifteen of patients (25.4%) had secondary APS. aCL and aPS antibody assays were performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

All isotypes of aCL and aPS antibodies except IgG were higher in patients with or without APS than those in the healthy controls (p<0.001). The most significant associations were found among migraine and IgA aCL (p<0.001), livedo reticularis and both IgM aCL and IgM aPS (p<0.001), migraine and IgM aCL (p<0.01), pulmonary involvement and IgM aCL (p<0.01), migraine and IgA aPS (p<0.01), and both thrombosis and migraine with IgM aPS (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

A relatively high prevalence of aCL and aPS antibodies was found in our SLE patients. It seems that isotypes of IgM aCL, IgM aPS, IgA aCL, and IgA aPS antibodies are correlated well with migraine and IgM aPS with thrombosis in SLE patients with secondary APS. The assessment of both IgM and IgA isotypes of aPS and aCL antibodies may be helpful in predicting these manifestations.

Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by recurrent vascular thrombosis and pregnancy losses. Laboratory diagnosis of APS relies on the demonstration of a positive anticardiolipin antibody test by an in-house or commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, or on the presence of lupus anticoagulant by a coagulation-based test. Persistence of the positive results must be demonstrated, and other causes and underlying factors considered. Although it is universally recognized that the routine screening tests (anticardiolipin antibody or lupus anticoagulant) might miss some cases of APS, careful differential diagnosis and repeat testing are mandatory before the diagnosis of 'seronegative APS' can be made. Correct identification of patients with APS is important because prophylactic anticoagulant therapy can prevent thrombosis from recurring and treatment of affected women during pregnancy can improve fetal and maternal outcome.

Clinical laboratory testing for the antiphospholipid syndrome

The first aCL test was developed in 1983 and subsequently standardized. Although in the last 6 to 7 years, new and more specific tests have become available, the aCL ELISA and the LA tests are still the first choice to be used in diagnosis of APS. While there is now doubt that the anticardiolipin test is useful in the diagnosis of APS, limitations of the assay have caused uncertainty and misinterpretation of the value of the test. Utilization of validated ELISA kits with well-tested calibrators and an "in-house standard" may enable more reproducible measurements. Reporting results semiquantitatively preserves the clinical utilize of the test without the misinterpretation of a quantitative result that may lack precision. The development of newer tests such as the beta2GPI ELISA and the APhL ELISA Kit, utilizing the phospholipid mixture, give promise to a more specific and reliable diagnosis of APS, while retaining good sensitivity. Other tests such as ELISA for prothrombin antibodies and annexin V antibodies are still under development and will require standardization and extensive evaluation. The aCL test should continue to be done and included in the Sapporo criteria. The aCL test is not as specific as the anti-beta2GPI test, but it is very sensitive and together with the LA test should capture the majority of the APS patients. IgA aCL and anti-beta2GPI positivity alone is rare but occasionally found and shown to be associated with major clinical manifestations of APS. Therefore, it is now recommended to include both tests, IgA aCL and IgG, IgM and IgA anti-beta2GPI to confirm diagnosis of APS.

Antiphospholipid syndrome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus treated by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the most common disease associated with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We, therefore, evaluated 46 patients with refractory SLE treated by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for a history of APS prior to transplantation. The prevalence of SLE-related APS in our patient population was 61% (28 of 46 patients with refractory SLE). Nineteen of 28 patients with APS had lupus anticoagulant (LA) or high titers of anticardiolipin antibodies (ACLAs), either immunoglobulin (Ig)G or IgM, when evaluated at study entry. Six of 8 evaluable LA+ patients became and remained LA-; 5 of 7 initially ACLA IgG+ patients and 9 of 11 ACLA IgM+ patients demonstrated normalization of ACLA titers when followed after HSCT. Eighteen of 22 patients refractory to chronic anticoagulation discontinued anticoagulation therapy a median of 4 months after transplantation; 78% of them remained free of thrombotic events and in complete SLE remission for up to 78 months (median, 15 months) after HSCT. There was no treatment-related mortality. Autologous HSCT may be performed safely in patients with APS and appears to be effective therapy for eliminating ALPAs and preventing thrombotic complications in patients with SLE.

Clinical importance of positive test results for lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies

OBJECTIVES

To assess the performance of 4 clotting assays for lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection, to determine the prevalence of LA and anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), and to correlate LA and aCL prevalence with systemic disease and thrombosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 664 consecutive patients at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, who were referred for laboratory testing because of a clinical suspicion of LA or thrombophilia between June 25, 1990, and July 1, 1991.

RESULTS

Of 664 patients tested for LA, 584 also were tested for aCL. Of patients tested for both LA and aCL, 137 (235%) had positive results for one or both tests (13 [95%], LA-positive only; 76 [555%], aCL-positive only; and 48 [35.0%], positive for both). The dilute Russell viper venom time (DRVVT) was the most frequently positive LA assay (74% of the 61 patients with positive results for LA). Twenty-two patients (36.1% of the 61) had positive results for all 4 LA assays, whereas 21 (34.4% of the 61) had positive results for only 1 LA assay: activated partial thromboplastin time (3 patients [4.9%]), plasma clot time (5 patients [8.2%]), kaolin clot time (5 patients [8.2%]), or DRVVT (8 patients [13.1%]). Thromboembolism prevalence was not definitely associated with positive test results (LA only, aCL only, or LA plus aCL), nor was it strongly associated with aCL isotype or titer. Furthermore, thromboembolism prevalence was not increased when all LA assays were positive, although a history of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism was nonsignificantly associated with positive results for all 4 LA tests. The likelihood of having both LA- and aCL-positive test results was higher among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (26 [19.0%] of 137 patients with positive results for one or both tests), but they had no more thrombotic events or fetal loss than other patients in our study group.

CONCLUSIONS

The DRVVT identified more patients with LA than the other LA tests, but more than 1 LA test was required to identify all patients with LA. Positive results were much more common for aCL than for LA. No single LA test or anticardiolipin isotype correlated with thrombosis or systemic disease in this population.

Antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with an increased risk for chronic renal insufficiency in patients with lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have documented the high frequency of thrombosis and fetal loss in patients with lupus nephritis and antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies, but there is little information on the impact of aPL antibodies on the outcome of lupus nephritis. The aims of this study are to evaluate the prevalence of aPL antibodies in patients with lupus nephritis and assess their prognostic value for thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity and impact on long-term renal outcome.

METHODS

One hundred eleven patients with lupus nephritis followed up for a mean of 173 +/- 100 months were tested regularly for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of aPL antibodies was 26%. In follow-up, 79% of aPL antibody-positive patients experienced thrombotic events and/or fetal losses, and aPL antibodies were associated significantly with arterial or venous thrombosis (P = 0.00001), pregnancy morbidity (P = 0.045), thrombocytopenia (P = 0.0015), and persistent arterial hypertension (P = 0.028). aPL antibodies were significantly more frequent in patients with biopsy-proven membranous lupus nephritis (P = 0.01). A strong association between aPL antibodies and the development of chronic renal insufficiency in the long-term outcome also was found (P = 0.01). With multivariate analysis, aPL antibody positivity (P = 0.02), high plasma creatinine level at presentation (P = 0.01), and chronicity index (P = 0.00004) were independent predictors of chronic renal function deterioration.

CONCLUSION

Detection of aPL antibodies in patients with lupus nephritis is useful not only to identify patients at risk for vascular and obstetric manifestations, but also for their potential deleterious impact on renal outcome.

Revisiting the anticardiolipin test and its standardization

Although the importance of the anticardiolipin test in diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is widely accepted, there remains much misunderstanding about the strengths and weaknesses of this assay. Several disorders result in formation of low levels of the antibody, hence the anticardiolipin test is not specific when results are low positive. In general, the higher the anticardiolipin level the greater the likelihood of a diagnosis of APS. Hence there have been numerous efforts to enable reproducible measurement of anticardiolipin levels. Standard calibrators were introduced to construct calibration curves from which levels of unknown samples can be derived. Those standard calibrators were made by mixing varying quantities of high positive with normal sera. More recently, calibrators derived from monoclonal anticardiolipin antibodies have been introduced. There are advantages and disadvantages with both types of calibrators. Determination of a precise and reproducible anticardiolipin level is difficult, whatever the calibrators used, because the assay is dependent on several variable components, any of which may fail on any given day. Utilization of a semi-quantitative measure (low, medium, high) may suffice in most clinical settings and would be less subject to error. Validated ELISA kits may offer greater reproducibility, since there is less variability than bench assays set up in very different laboratories. Whether using a kit or a bench assay, meticulous attention to detail offers the best opportunity for precision and reproducibility.

Immunoglobulin A anti-beta2-glycoprotein antibodies in women who experience unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion and unexplained fetal death

OBJECTIVE

Studies in rheumatologic populations suggest that immunoglobulin A antiphospholipid antibodies are strongly associated with the clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome. However, the association between immunoglobulin A antiphospholipid antibodies and pregnancy loss is uncertain. We determined whether immunoglobulin A antiphospholipid antibodies, specifically anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I and anticardiolipin, are associated with the obstetric features of antiphospholipid syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN

Sera from 4 groups of women were studied: (1) 133 women who experienced unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion, (2) 48 women who experienced unexplained fetal death, (3) 145 healthy fertile control subjects, and (4) 67 women with well-characterized antiphospholipid syndrome. Serum immunoglobulin A, immunoglobulin G, and immunoglobulin M anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I and anticardiolipin antibodies were determined by enzyme-linked immunoassay.

RESULTS

Groups of women who experienced unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion and unexplained fetal death had a higher proportion of women who had positive test results for immunoglobulin A anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I antibodies than fertile control subjects (P < .01, chi-square test); these subjects also had higher levels of autoantibody (P = .001, Kruskal-Wallis). Women who experienced recurrent spontaneous abortion had a higher proportion of women with positive test results for immunoglobulin A anticardiolipin antibodies compared to fertile control subjects (P < .05, chi-square test); this group also had higher levels of autoantibody (P = .0065, Kruskal-Wallis test). Linear regression analysis showed significant correlation between anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I immunoglobulin A and anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I immunoglobulin G (R = .609; P =.0001) and less correlation between anticardiolipin immunoglobulin A and anticardiolipin immunoglobulin G (R = .093; P = .065).

CONCLUSION

Immunoglobulin A anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I antibodies are more common in women who experience unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion and unexplained fetal death whose initial test results are negative for lupus anticoagulant and immunoglobulin G anticardiolipin antibodies compared to fertile control subjects. Therefore, these antibodies may identify additional women with clinical features of antiphospholipid syndrome who are not identified through traditional testing. It is unclear whether these antibodies are directly pathogenic, a result of the pregnancy losses, or markers for an underlying, yet uncharacterized autoimmune disorder.

Prevalence and isotype distribution of antiphospholipid antibodies in Chilean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

Previous studies have demonstrated that ethnicity plays a role in the prevalence, isotype distribution, and clinical significance of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I (abeta2-GPI) antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Few studies have been done in Latin American populations. Serum samples from 129 Chilean SLE patients were tested for IgG, IgM and IgA aCL and abeta2-GPI by ELISA. Clinical data were reviewed with the focus on clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Positivity for at least one isotype of aCL was found in 30% of patients, while only 10% were positive for at least one isotype of abeta2-GPI. IgG was the most prevalent isotype for aCL (16%), and the isotype distribution was similar (4%) for abeta2-GPI. In general, the presence of aCL was significantly associated with the presence of abeta2-GPI, but a number of samples were positive for only one antibody, some of them associated with clinical manifestations of APS. ACL antibodies at medium-high titers were significantly correlated with thrombosis (P = 0.0007) and fetal loss (P = 0.009); however, the sensitivity of abeta2-GPI for detecting thrombosis and fetal loss was lower than aCL (19 and 17% vs 56 and 50%, respectively), and the specificity slightly higher (91 and 90% vs 84 and 82%). In Chilean SLE patients, aCL and abeta2-GPI antibodies are important in the evaluation of patients with APS. However, the utility of abeta2-GPI antibodies was limited by the low prevalence of these antibodies in comparison with other ethnic groups. Further studies are needed to define the basis of the observed differences among ethnic groups.

Testing for antiphospholipid antibodies: problems and solutions

The first aCL test was developed in 1983 and subsequently standardized. Although new and more specific tests have become available, the aCL ELISA and the LA tests are still the first choice to be used in diagnosis of APS. Newer tests such as the anti beta 2 GP1 ELISA and the APhL ELISA Kit (Louisville APL Diagnostics) use somewhat different antigens and likely provide a more specific (and possibly more reliable) diagnosis of APS while retaining good-to-excellent sensitivity. Other tests, such as ELISA for prothrombin antibodies and annexin V antibodies, are still undergoing development and will require standardization and extensive evaluation. We thank Dr Isabel Abreu and Dr Mittermeyer B. Santiago for performing some of the studies reported in this review.

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and renal disease

The antiphospholipid syndrome is a disorder of hypercoagulability in association with circulating antiphospholipid antibodies directed against epitopes on oxidized phospholipids complexed with a glycoprotein, beta 2-glycoprotein I, or against the glycoprotein itself. Disorders associated with antiphospholipid antibodies but not the antiphospholipid syndrome, such as HIV and hepatitis C infection, appear to lack antibodies to beta 2-glycoprotein I. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus have a high incidence of antiphospholipid antibodies with a high risk of thrombosis, often associated with anticardiolipin antibodies, beta 2-glyocoprotein I antibodies, and the presence of the lupus anticoagulant. Antiphospholipid antibodies are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in renal patients with and without systemic lupus erythematosus. Renal manifestations include thrombotic microangiopathy and large vessel thrombosis. In patients with end-stage renal disease, antiphospholipid antibodies are prevalent and may increase in frequency with time on dialysis, possibly as a result of oxidative stress incurred during dialysis. The presence of anticardiolipin antibodies have been associated with a high incidence of hemodialysis access clotting. In renal transplant recipients, the incidence of antiphospholipid antibodies is also elevated and may be associated with a higher incidence of primary graft non-function. Although patients with systemic lupus erythematosus have similar renal allograft survival rates to the general population, survival is worse for those patients who are also antiphospholipid antibody positive. Additionally, in hepatitis C positive renal transplant recipients, the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies confers an increased risk of thrombotic complications and the development of thrombotic microangiopathy. Treatment of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome remains centered around anticoagulation with warfarin. The use of immunosuppressive agents has had no dramatic effect on antiphospholipid antibody titers and little clinical effect on thrombotic events.

Which are the best biological markers of the antiphospholipid syndrome?

The diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) requires the presence of both clinical and biological features. Due to the heterogeneity of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) the laboratory approach for their detection includes clotting-based tests for lupus anticoagulant (LA) as well as solid-phase assays for anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL). In addition, as it has been shown that autoimmune aPL recognize epitopes on phospholipid (PL)-binding plasma proteins, assays detecting antibodies to beta 2-glycoprotein I (beta 2-GPI) or prothrombin have been developed. The association between venous or arterial thrombosis and recurrent fetal loss with the presence of conventional aPL (LA and/or aCL) has been confirmed by many studies. The LA and IgG aCL at moderate/high titre seem to exhibit the strongest association with clinical manifestations of the APS. Several reports indicate that LA is less sensitive but more specific than aCL for the APS. Assays against PLs other than CL as well as the use of mixtures of PLs have been proposed to improve the detection of APS-related aPL. Concerning antibodies to PL-binding proteins (detected in the absence of PLs), there is evidence that anti-beta 2-GPI are closely associated with thrombosis and other clinical features of the APS. Moreover, these antibodies may be more specific in the recognition of the APS and in some cases may be present in the absence of aPL detected by standard tests. Many issues are still under debate and are discussed in this review, such as the problems of standardization of anti-beta 2-GPI assays, detection of the IgA isotype of aCL and anti-beta 2-GPI, the coagulation profiles of LA in the recognition of the thrombotic risk and the association of particular markers with subsets of patients with APS.

Differential diagnosis of central nervous system manifestations of the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome

Anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) have been associated with a variety of neurologic manifestations. The evidence for an association between aPL and most of these is weak because (1) no association actually exists, (2) the manifestation is rare or (3) sufficiently powered studies have not been performed. The only neurologic manifestation that is considered to have sufficient evidence to justify it being a part of the criteria for the diagnosis of Anti-phospholipid Antibody Syndrome (APS) is cerebral ischemia. In this mini-review, most of the neurologic syndromes with an actual or suspected association with aPL are considered. The role of aPL in the differential diagnosis of these syndromes is considered as well.

The use of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of SLE

ANA IIF is an effective screening assay in patients with clinical features of SLE and will detect most anti-ssDNA, anti-dsDNA, ENAs, and other autoantibodies. False positives are common. The clinical importance cannot be extrapolated from the ANA titre or pattern, although higher titres (> 1/160) are more likely to be important. HEp-2 cells are the most sensitive substrate for ANA detection, but this must be balanced against an increased incidence of insignificant positivity. ANA positive samples should be subjected to more specific assays for the diagnosis of SLE. A combination of ENA (Ro/La/Sm/RNP) and dsDNA assays will detect most patients with SLE as long as the characteristics of the assays used are well understood. ESR and CRP measurements provide useful additional information. Sjogren's syndrome and MCTD will produce overlapping serology with SLE, and anti-dsDNA titres are sometimes seen in autoimmune hepatitis and rheumatoid arthritis. All results should be reported in the light of the clinical details, by an experienced immunologist. A suggested diagnostic protocol is outlined in fig 1. The type of assay used crucially influences the predictive value of the tests. ELISA technology dominates routine laboratory practice, but tends to produce more false positive and true weak positive results, which may reduce the PPV of the test. This can be minimised by using IgG specific conjugates and careful assay validation. The NPV for SLE [figure: see text] is high for most assays but the PPV varies. Where necessary, laboratories should use crithidia or Farr dsDNA assays to confirm dubious ELISA dsDNA results, and ID/IB to confirm dubious ENA results. For monitoring, a precise, quantitative assay is required. It is unclear whether the detection of IgM or low affinity antibodies has a role here. A combination of anti-dsDNA, C3, C4, CRP, and ESR assays provides the most useful clinical information. Anti-ssDNA assays are likely to be useful, and are potentially more robust than anti-dsDNA assays, but require more validation. Local validation of individual assays and EQA participation is essential. Not all assays that apparently measure the same antibody specificities have equal clinical relevance, even within a single technology. Insufficient international or national reference preparations are currently available for many antibody specificities to enable effective standardisation. Quality assurance schemes reveal large differences in units reported by different assays for some analytes, even when calibrated against an IRP or equivalent reference preparation. Serial results can therefore only be compared from the same laboratory at present. Most autoantibodies increase during active disease, but few prospective data are currently available to justify treatment on the basis of rising titres. Further randomised prospective studies are required to examine the importance of antibody isotype and affinity in the monitoring of SLE by individual assay methods. The most important aspect of the appropriate use of laboratory assays is to become familiar with the limitations of the technology currently in use in your local laboratory, and to consult with your clinical immunologist in cases of doubt, preferably before commencing serological screening.

Isotype distribution and clinical relevance of anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2-GPI) antibodies: importance of IgA isotype

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of IgG, IgA and IgM anti-beta2-GPI antibodies in anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS), and to establish the clinical significance of IgA type antibodies compared with the other isotypes. Anti-beta2-GPI antibodies were measured in the sera of 70 patients by solid-phase enzyme immunoassay in gamma-irradiated polystyrene plates coated with human purified beta2-GPI. Thirty-three out of the 70 patients were classified as having APS: three of them had primary, and 30 had secondary APS related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The remaining 37 patients had SLE without APS. Anti-beta2-GPI antibodies of IgG, IgA and IgM isotypes were present in 84.8%, 59.3% and 51.5% of patients with APS. Both the frequency and the level of each isotype were significantly higher in patients with APS. This association was very strong for IgA (P = 0.0004 for the antibody frequency and P < 0.0001 for the antibody level), as well as for IgG type antibodies (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001), whereas it was weaker for IgM (P = 0.01 and P = 0.04). A strong relationship was demonstrated between increased IgA anti-beta2-GPI antibody levels and a history of venous thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, heart valve disease, livedo reticularis and epilepsy. IgG anti-beta2-GPI antibodies were associated with the presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA) in addition to the main features of APS. However, antibodies of IgM isotype were related only to thrombocytopenia and heart valve disease. We recommend the evaluation of anti-beta2-GPI antibodies of IgA isotype in addition to IgG in patients with clinical suspicion of APS.

Anticardiolipin and anti-beta2glycoprotein-I antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison between Colombians and Spaniards

We studied the prevalence, isotype distribution, and clinical significance of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2glycoprotein I (anti-beta2GPI) antibodies in two populations of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 160 Colombians and 160 Spaniards. All sera were tested in our laboratory by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IgG, IgM, and IgA aCL, as well as IgG and IgM anti-beta2GPI. Positive results for at least 1 of the 3 aCL isotypes were found in 40 Colombians (25%) and 55 Spaniards (34%). IgG aCL was the predominant isotype in both populations. Positive results for at least 1 of the anti-beta2GPI isotypes were found in 34 Colombians (21%) and 29 Spaniards (18%). IgG anti-beta2GPI was the dominant isotype in Colombians, while IgM was predominant in Spaniards. Positivity for anti-beta2GPI in aCL-positive patients was present in 77% in the Colombian group and 50% in the Spaniard group. Among Colombians, IgG aCL and anti-beta2GPI correlated with thrombosis, fetal loss, and thrombocytopenia. Among Spaniards, IgG aCL and IgG anti-beta2GPI correlated with thrombosis, fetal loss, and livedo reticularis. For detecting thrombosis and fetal loss, aCL ELISA was more sensitive than anti-beta2GPI in Spaniards, and anti-beta2GPI ELISA was more specific than aCL in both populations.

Serum anti-beta2-glycoprotein-I and anticardiolipin antibodies during thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus patients

PURPOSE

Antibodies to beta2-glycoprotein-I are more strongly associated with clinical antiphospholipid syndrome than are anticardiolipin antibodies. We previously found a decrease in anticardiolipin antibodies at the time of thrombosis in 6 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We therefore sought to determine the prevalence and levels of antibodies to beta2-glycoprotein-I and to cardiolipin before, during, and after thrombosis in patients with SLE, and to compare them with patients who did not have thrombosis.

METHODS

We studied 24 patients with SLE who had at least one episode of thrombosis and 102 patients with SLE without thrombosis. Serum anticardiolipin antibodies were measured by conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using newborn calf serum as the blocking agent. Serum anti-beta2-glycoprotein-I antibodies were measured by ELISA on nonirradiated plates, using purified human beta2-glycoprotein-I without phospholipid.

RESULTS

All patients with thrombosis had anti-beta2-glycoprotein-I antibodies, compared with only 17% of controls (P <0.0001). We observed a significant decrease in serum anti-beta2-glycoprotein-I levels at the time of thrombosis, as compared with previous and subsequent samples. The prevalence and levels of IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies were similar in patients with and without thrombosis. A decrease in IgG or IgM anticardiolipin titers occurred during thrombosis in 6 patients. Anticoagulant, corticosteroid, and immunosuppressive treatments did not appear to affect anti-beta2-glycoprotein-I levels at the time of thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

Anti-beta2-glycoprotein-I antibodies are strongly associated with thrombosis in patients with SLE. The decrease of anti-beta2-glycoprotein-I levels at the time of thrombosis may indicate a pathogenic role. This antibody may also be a marker of predisposition for thrombosis in these patients.

The interdisciplinary team's approach to lupus nephritis

The interdisciplinary team approach in assessment and treatment of patients with chronic disease in general and lupus nephritis in particular provides a global format for identifying the multiple problem areas that retard or prevent optimal patient functioning. These areas include the physical, emotional, economic, psychosocial, and functional. Benefits to the individual patient include a thorough multifaceted assessment by professionals who have the benefit of peer collaboration and validation. This increases the likelihood that the whole patient is considered, not just the problem of nephritis. For example, how does the patient and her or his family cope with the impact of such a disease and how, in turn, do the coping abilities of the patient and family affect the disease. The interdisciplinary team also assesses how the treatment strategies for each problem area influence each other. Finally, the interdisciplinary team serves as a positive role model for effective collaboration among health professionals and for students in their respective disciplines.

Antiphospholipid (Hughes') syndrome in African-Americans: IgA aCL and abeta2 glycoprotein-I is the most frequent isotype

Antiphospholipid (Hughes') syndrome (APS) has not been reported in African-Americans (A-A) as frequently as in other ethnic groups. We describe eight A-A female patients with APS, including two cases of primary APS (PAPS), four with APS secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), one with Sjögren's syndrome, and one with overlap connective tissue disease (CTD). Their mean age was 34 y (range 24-47 y). Patients were followed for a mean of 6 y (range 0.3-11 y). During follow up, both anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2glycoprotein-I (abeta2GPI) antibodies were measured in stored sera by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). IgA was the most frequent isotype of aCL and abeta2GPI, and co-occurred with the IgM isotype in three of four patients with neurologic manifestations.