A novel intermittent regimen of norgestimate to preserve the beneficial effects of 17beta-estradiol on lipid and lipoprotein profiles

The effect of continuous oestradiol with intermittent norgestimate on bone mineral density and bone turnover in post-menopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To assess in post-menopausal women the efficacy and tolerability of a continuous oestradiol/intermittent norgestimate HRT regimen to prevent and to reverse post-menopausal loss of bone mineral density (BMD) and to determine the effects on serum bone turnover markers markers.

METHODS

A 1-year, multicentre, international, placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in 146 post-menopausal women with an intact uterus in order to assess the effect on bone loss of continuous oral 17beta-oestradiol (1 mg per day) combined with norgestimate (90 microg per day), for 3 consecutive days out of every 6-day treatment period (E2/iNGM). During a second year extension, all women agreeing to continue were on the E2/iNGM regimen. BMD was assessed prior to treatment and after 1 and 2 years or at the end of treatment in women stopping participation prematurely after at least 6 months of treatment. Serum bone turnover markers were determined prior to and at 1 year of treatment Adverse events were collected at three-monthly intervals during clinic visits over the treatment period.

RESULTS

BMD in the lumbar spine, the primary endpoint, was evaluable in 117 subjects completing >6 months of treatment. BMD increased on average by 2.4% in women on the intermittent progestin regimen. It decreased by 1.4% in placebo treated women. The change from baseline and the difference between active and placebo treatment (Delta placebo) were highly significant (P < 0.0001). On E2/iNGM, also the BMD in the total hip increased (+1.49%, Delta placebo 3.73%, P < 0.0001). The serum markers for bone formation osteocalcin and type I collagen N-propeptide were significantly reduced compared to baseline by 31 and 44%, respectively and the bone resorption marker C-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type I collagen by 59%. Minor increases (<10%) of markers in the placebo group were not significant. During a second year extension of the trial, all subjects were on active treatment. Subjects on placebo who lost (median+/-CI 95%) 0.66% (-2.3 to +0.5) of spine BMD during the first year now gained 4.41% (2.7-7.6). They also gained 1.6% (0.1-0.3.6) in the total hip. Subjects continuously on oestradiol/intermittent norgestimate (E2/iNGM) gained an additional 5.7% (2.3-13.5) in the lumbar spine and +0.1% (-0.6 to +2.2) at the total hip. Side effects reported by women on the intermittent progestin regimen significantly in excess over reports from the placebo group were uterine bleeding, abdominal and breast pain, but not headache. Back pain and weight gain was reported by significantly fewer women on active treatment compared to placebo.

CONCLUSION

The continuous oestradiol/intermittent norgestimate HRT regimen is well tolerated, reduces bone turnover and prevents post-menopausal bone loss in healthy post-menopausal women.

Hormone replacement therapy: optimising the dose and route of administration

Several new products and regimens for estrogen replacement in the postmenopausal woman have recently been introduced, giving physicians and patients greater choice not only in dose but also in route of administration. Estrogen treatment in the postmenopausal woman has several proven benefits for those who have vasomotor symptoms or problems related to urogenital atrophy. However, the most controversial area is in the long-term preventive benefits of estrogen against the development of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease, particularly in women older than 60 years. It is in these areas that decisions on the dose and optimal route of administration of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) must be made. Although adding a progestogen to an ERT regimen is mandatory, particularly in a woman with an intact uterus, discussion now focuses on which progestogen least attenuates the beneficial effects of estrogen. Emerging trends suggest that lower doses of estrogen (i.e. ethinylestradiol 5 microg/day, estradiol 0.25 mg/day or conjugated estrogens [CEE] 0.3 mg/day) continuously combined with lower doses of medroxyprogesterone (MPA) are equally effective at relieving vasomotor symptoms as the most commonly prescribed regimen in the US (CEE 0.625mg/MPA 2.5mg daily), with fewer adverse events, leading to greater patient acceptance and likelihood for continuation of therapy. This is especially important when therapy is initiated at an older age.

Pharmacotherapeutics for osteoporosis prevention and treatment

Osteoporosis is a silent disease that affects 10 million Americans; 80% of those affected are women. Although the disease is more common in postmenopausal Caucasian women, all ages and races are at risk. Osteoporosis can be a debilitating disease that can cause pain, fractures, depression, and social withdrawal. Signs of osteoporosis include kyphosis, loss of height, and protrusion of the abdomen. Because symptoms generally do not occur until after the disease has progressed, clinicians should include osteoporosis screening and preventative education as part of the regular gynecologic care. Diagnosis is typically made by a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. Treatment consists of dietary and lifestyle changes, along with pharmacologic intervention. Although hormone therapy has been shown to be effective in preventing osteoporosis, the risks of long-term treatment with HRT are discussed. The following effective treatment options for women who have been diagnosed with the disease are discussed: bisphosphonates, calcitonin, and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). Because midwives regularly care for women of all ages, they are ideal candidates to provide women with preventative education, screening, counseling, and treatment.

Clinical assessment and quality of life of postmenopausal women treated with a new intermittent progestogen combination hormone replacement therapy: a placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a constant-estrogen, intermittent-progestogen hormone replacement regimen (Ortho-Prefest, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Raritan, NJ, USA) on menopausal symptoms measured by the Kupperman Index and on quality of life measured by the Menopause Quality of Life-Intervention questionnaire.

DESIGN

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study of 90 days' duration. Nonhysterectomized, postmenopausal women with vasomotor symptoms and at least 6 months' amenorrhea were eligible. On completion of the placebo-controlled portion of the study, participants could elect to receive active treatment for an additional 90 days.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 119 participants, 59 and 60 in the Prefest and placebo groups, respectively. A marked reduction of menopausal symptoms, as measured by the Kupperman Index, was observed in the active treatment group compared with the placebo group after 45 days' treatment (mean reduction, 14.8 v 7.2 points, respectively), which was sustained to day 90 (16.8 v 7.8 points; < 0.001). Similarly, greater improvement in quality of life, as measured by the Menopause Quality of Life summary score, was also observed in the active treatment group for the same period (improvement of up to 1.6 points v 0.7 points; < 0.001). The adverse event profile was unremarkable. Of the 114 participants who received the active treatment, 6 withdrew because of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The constant-estrogen, intermittent-progestogen regimen was highly effective in relieving menopausal symptoms and in improving quality of life and was well received by the study participants.

Cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women: myths and reality

Although cardiovascular disease (CVD) has traditionally been considered a disease that affects middle-aged men, it also has a profound effect on women. By age 65, the number of deaths from CVD in women surpasses deaths in men by 11%. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in women. Despite the impact of CVD, women as a group, as well as healthcare professionals, have not focused on this disease entity. As a result, women may not make adjustments that could reduce their risk for CVD, and healthcare professionals may not adequately counsel women on risk modification, which may include lifestyle changes and pharmaceutical intervention. Although there are many similarities, women differ from men in both disease presentation and prognosis for CVD. Because of the difference in presentation, diagnoses in women may be delayed, potentially causing further harm. Although the number of deaths caused by CVD has been decreasing in men, this trend has yet to be observed in women.

Effects of progestins in different hormone replacement therapy formulations on estrogen-induced lipid changes in postmenopausal women

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT), used by many women to relieve the symptoms of menopause and for the prevention of osteoporosis, is available in an increasing number of formulations. Options include various combinations of estrogen and progestin as well as different routes of administration. For women with a uterus, who require a progestin, a convenient and commonly used option is combining the estrogen and progestin in a single pill. Such formulations have the lipid-modifying effects of estrogen, altered to specific type and dose of progestin used. The cardioprotective increases in levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol associated with exogenous estrogen may be blunted or even reversed with certain HRT regimens. In addition, some progestins minimize the increase in triglycerides that occurs with exogenous estrogen, whereas others do not. Because of the importance of lipid markers as risk factors for cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women, these lipid effects should be carefully considered when selecting an HRT regimen.

Estradiol and norgestimate: a review of their combined use as hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women

The focus of this review is hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with continuous administration of micronised, oral 17beta-estradiol 1 mg/day (herein referred to as continuous estradiol) plus micronised, oral norgestimate 90 microg/day administered for 3 days then withdrawn for 3 days in a 6-day repeating sequence (herein referred to as intermittent norgestimate). According to data from randomised, comparative trials of 1 year's duration, continuous estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent norgestimate 90 microg/day relieves climacteric symptoms (vasomotor symptoms and vulvovaginal atrophy) in postmenopausal women. Continuous estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent norgestimate 90 microg/day appeared as effective as estradiol 1 mg/day alone or continuous estradiol 2 mg/day plus continuous norethisterone acetate 1 mg/day in the treatment of postmenopausal women with vasomotor symptoms. Continuous estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent norgestimate 90 microg/day was as effective as continuous estradiol 1 mg/day in causing the maturation of vaginal epithelial cells. In a randomised, double-blind study, bone mineral density (BMD) increased to a significantly greater extent and the rate of bone turnover was slower in postmenopausal women treated with continuous oral estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent norgestimate 90 microg/day than in placebo-treated patients. Two randomised, double-blind studies indicated that the addition of norgestimate 90 microg/day to continuous estradiol 1 mg/day did not attenuate the beneficial effects of estradiol on lipid parameters. Continuous estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent norgestimate 90 microg/day was associated with increases in mean serum high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels and decreases in total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and lipoprotein (a) levels, compared with baseline. There was no statistically significant increase in triglyceride levels. In comparative trials, continuous oral estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent oral norgestimate 90 microg/day was well tolerated. Headache, breast pain or discomfort, abdominal pain or discomfort, uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhoea, oedema, nausea and depression were the most commonly reported adverse events. Continuous estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent oral norgestimate 90 microg/day was associated with a favourable uterine bleeding profile that improved over time. In a randomised trial, 80% of women were free from bleeding (irrespective of spotting) during month 12 of treatment. Norgestimate 90 microg/day was effective in protecting postmenopausal women against induction of endometrial hyperplasia by continuous estradiol 1 mg/day. In conclusion, data from a limited number of randomised studies indicate that HRT with continuous estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent norgestimate 90 microg/day is effective in relieving climacteric symptoms, increasing BMD and slowing the rate of bone turnover in postmenopausal women. This HRT regimen is well tolerated and is associated with a similar incidence of adverse events to that reported in recipients of continuous estradiol 1 mg/day. The norgestimate component of the regimen provides good endometrial protection and is associated with a favourable bleeding profile. Long-term studies investigating the associated risk of breast cancer and thromboembolic events in recipients of continuous estradiol plus intermittent norgestimate are needed. In the meantime, continuous oral estradiol plus intermittent oral norgestimate can be regarded as an effective new option for HRT in postmenopausal women.

Spotlight on Estradiol and Norgestimate as Hormone Replacement Therapy in Postmenopausal Women*

The focus of this review is hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with continuous administration of micronized, oral 17beta-estradiol 1 mg/day (herein referred to as continuous estradiol) plus micronized, oral norgestimate 90 microg/day administered for 3 days then withdrawn for 3 days in a 6-day repeating sequence (herein referred to as intermittent norgestimate). According to data from randomized, comparative trials of 1 year's duration, continuous estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent norgestimate 90 microg/day relieves climacteric symptoms (vasomotor symptoms and vulvovaginal atrophy) in postmenopausal women. Continuous estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent norgestimate 90 microg/day appeared as effective as estradiol 1 mg/day alone or continuous estradiol 2 mg/day plus continuous norethisterone acetate 1 mg/day in the treatment of postmenopausal women with vasomotor symptoms. Continuous estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent norgestimate 90 microg/day was as effective as continuous estradiol 1 mg/day in causing the maturation of vaginal epithelial cells. In a randomized, double-blind study, bone mineral density (BMD) increased to a significantly greater extent and the rate of bone turnover was slower in postmenopausal women treated with continuous oral estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent norgestimate 90 microg/day than in placebo-treated patients. Two randomized, double-blind studies indicated that the addition of norgestimate 90 microg/day to continuous estradiol 1 mg/day did not attenuate the beneficial effects of estradiol on lipid parameters. Continuous estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent norgestimate 90 microg/day was associated with increases in mean serum high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels and decreases in total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and lipoprotein (a) levels, compared with baseline. There was no statistically significant increase in triglyceride levels. In comparative trials, continuous oral estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent oral norgestimate 90 microg/day was well tolerated. Headache, breast pain or discomfort, abdominal pain or discomfort, uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, edema, nausea and depression were the most commonly reported adverse events. Continuous estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent oral norgestimate 90 microg/day was associated with a favorable uterine bleeding profile that improved over time. In a randomized trial, 80% of women were free from bleeding (irrespective of spotting) during month 12 of treatment. Norgestimate 90 microg/day was effective in protecting postmenopausal women against induction of endometrial hyperplasia by continuous estradiol 1 mg/day. In conclusion, data from a limited number of randomized studies indicate that HRT with continuous estradiol 1 mg/day plus intermittent norgestimate 90 microg/day is effective in relieving climacteric symptoms, increasing BMD and slowing the rate of bone turnover in postmenopausal women. This HRT regimen is well tolerated and is associated with a similar incidence of adverse events to that reported in recipients of continuous estradiol 1 mg/day. The norgestimate component of the regimen provides good endometrial protection and is associated with a favorable bleeding profile. Long-term studies investigating the associated risk of breast cancer and thromboembolic events in recipients of continuous estradiol plus intermittent norgestimate are needed. In the meantime, continuous oral estradiol plus intermittent oral norgestimate can be regarded as an effective new option for HRT in postmenopausal women.

Current perspectives on benefits and risks of hormone replacement therapy

Hormone replacement therapy with estrogen alone or with added progestin relieves menopausal symptoms and physical changes associated with depleted endogenous estrogen levels. Estrogen replacement has also demonstrated a clear benefit in the prevention of osteoporosis. Hormone replacement therapy with added progestin maintains spinal bone density, protects against postmenopausal hip fractures, and provides these benefits even when therapy is started after age 60. More recently, additional benefits have emerged. Current estrogen and hormone replacement therapy users have a 34% reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer and a 20% to 60% reduction in the risk of Alzheimer's disease. Until recently, the body of evidence indicated that hormone replacement therapy with estrogen only reduced cardiovascular disease risk by 40% to 50% in healthy patients; whether the findings of 3 ongoing trials will change this conclusion is pending availability of the final results. The many benefits of estrogen and hormone replacement therapy must be weighed against a slight increase in the risk of breast cancer diagnosis with use for 5 or more years, but which disappears following cessation of therapy. Overall, estrogen and hormone replacement therapy improves the quality of life and increases life expectancy for most menopausal women.

Preclinical profiles of progestins used in formulations of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy

Progestins used in oral contraceptive formulations available in the United States include norgestimate, desogestrel, norethindrone, norethindrone acetate, and levonorgestrel. Progestins used in the United States in continuous and intermittent formulations of hormone replacement therapy are norgestimate, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and norethindrone acetate. The chemical structure of a progestin determines its relative binding affinity for the progesterone and androgen receptors, as well as the sex hormone binding globulin in human serum, and determines its clinical profile. Overall, the properties of levonorgestrel or norethindrone acetate in this regard differ from norgestimate and are more conducive to androgenic stimulation. Estrogen replacement offers cardioprotective effects in postmenopausal women. Progestins are added to hormone replacement therapy to counteract the well-known increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia associated with the use of unopposed estrogen. Animal models show that for some parameters, including improvement of lipid profiles, progestins can diminish the cardioprotective effect of estrogen. Initial animal studies of norgestimate combined with estrogen do not show an attenuation of estrogenic effects.

Combined oral hormone replacement therapy formulations

Today, clinicians are challenged to address a woman's contraceptive needs during her reproductive and perimenopausal years and then provide her with a menopausal therapeutic option. This option should offer optimal symptom relief, noncontraceptive health benefits, and a good tolerability profile. The benefits of hormone replacement therapy include control of vasomotor symptoms, reduction of vulvovaginal atrophy, and protection against osteoporosis. Research also points to emerging hormone replacement therapy benefits such as protection against cardiovascular disease, colon cancer, and Alzheimer's disease. One of the primary considerations in the transition from oral contraceptive use to hormone replacement therapy is the tolerability profile of the progestin component of the hormone replacement therapy. Because progestin-related side effects are among the main reasons for discontinuation of hormone replacement therapy, the selection of a formulation that contains the same well-tolerated progestin as in the woman's oral contraceptive can be particularly important to successful use of hormone replacement therapy. Currently in the United States continuous combined hormone replacement therapy is available in 3 formulations and 1 continuous estrogen/intermittent progestin formulation. Although direct comparative trials are lacking, available data suggest that the new, continuous 17beta-estradiol/intermittent norgestimate hormone replacement therapy formulation may offer advantages over regimens that contain older progestins with metabolic disadvantages.

Effects of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy on lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein (a) concentrations: analysis of studies published from 1974-2000

OBJECTIVE

To establish reference estimates of the effects of different hormone replacement therapy (HRT) regimens on lipid and lipoprotein levels.

DESIGN

Review and pooled analysis of prospective studies published up until the year 2000.

SETTING

Clinical trials centers, hospitals, menopause clinics.

PATIENT(S)

Healthy postmenopausal women.

INTERVENTION(S)

Estrogen alone, estrogen plus progestogen, tibolone, or raloxifene in the treatment of menopausal symptoms.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Serum high- and low-density lipoprotein (HDL and LDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and lipoprotein (a).

RESULT(S)

Two-hundred forty-eight studies provided information on the effects of 42 different HRT regimens. All estrogen alone regimens raised HDL cholesterol and lowered LDL and total cholesterol. Oral estrogens raised triglycerides. Transdermal estradiol 17-beta lowered triglycerides. Progestogens had little effect on estrogen-induced reductions in LDL and total cholesterol. Estrogen-induced increases in HDL and triglycerides were opposed according to type of progestogen, in the order from least to greatest effect: dydrogesterone and medrogestone, progesterone, cyproterone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate, transdermal norethindrone acetate, norgestrel, and oral norethindrone acetate. Tibolone decreased HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Raloxifene reduced LDL cholesterol levels. In 41 studies of 20 different formulations, HRT generally lowered lipoprotein (a).

CONCLUSION(S)

Route of estrogen administration and type of progestogen determined differential effects of HRT on lipid and lipoprotein levels. Future work will focus on the interpretation of the clinical significance of these changes.

Constant estrogen, intermittent progestogen vs. continuous combined hormone replacement therapy: tolerability and effect on vasomotor symptoms

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a novel oral constant estrogen plus intermittent progestogen hormone replacement therapy (HRT) regimen to a continuous combined HRT regimen in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Subjects were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either constant 17beta-estradiol (E2), 1 mg, plus intermittent norgestimate (NGM) 90 microg (3 days off, 3 days on) (n=221) or E2 2 mg/norethisterone acetate (NETA) 1 mg (n=217) for 1 year. Treatments were evaluated based on the incidence of hot flushes and uterine bleeding.

RESULTS

Both regimens had similar bleeding profiles and provided comparable vasomotor symptom relief. However, breast discomfort and edema were experienced by twice as many subjects who received E2/NETA.

CONCLUSIONS

The constant E2/intermittent NGM regimen was well tolerated and possesses similar efficacy compared with a continuous combined E2/NETA regimen and may be considered whenever HRT without withdrawal bleeding is deemed appropriate.

Clinical evidence supporting the rationale for constant oestrogen, intermittent progestogen hormone replacement therapy

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) effectively relieves vasomotor and other symptoms associated with menopause, yet is underutilised by the majority of menopausal women. Current HRT regimens combine continuous oestrogen with continuous or sequential progestogen in order to achieve the beneficial effects of oestrogen while avoiding the potential for increased risk of endometrial cancer. Uterine bleeding and other adverse progestogenic effects are major reasons for patient noncompliance and early discontinuation of combination HRT, which can ultimately limit the achievement of long-term oestrogenic benefits. A novel constant 17beta-oestradiol, intermittent norgestimate regimen has been developed based on theoretical hormone receptor dynamics in an attempt to minimise the hormonal doses needed, thereby potentially reducing the occurrence of adverse effects associated with higher oestrogen and progestogen doses. Clinical trial data with this novel low-dose HRT regimen demonstrate effective relief of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women, acceptable bleeding rates, no endometrial hyperplasia, beneficial effects on lipids, and excellent tolerability. This regimen has the potential to increase long-term use resulting in important clinical benefits.