Traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta: third decade of experience

Unstable Spinal Fracture With Arteria Lusoria: Management to Mitigate Aortic Risks

Aortic injuries associated with unstable spinal fractures are a rare but serious condition, with high mortality. Rapid and multidisciplinary management is crucial to prevent fatal complications. We report the case of a female patient who, following a road traffic accident, presented with a displaced fracture of the fourth dorsal vertebrae (D4), with a detached anterior fragment adjacent to the posterior aspect of the aortic arch and the origin of the arteria lusoria. The multidisciplinary discussion concluded that surgery without an aortic prosthesis is associated with a major hemorrhagic risk due to aortic injury during spinal fixation manipulations, and surgery with a prosthesis is associated with immediate risks of ischemic cerebrovascular accident, gas embolism, and upper limb ischemia. We opted to prepare the patient for spinal stabilization surgery after placing the aortic prosthesis type: Zenith Alpha ZTA-PT-30-26-108 thoracic prosthesis (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Indiana, US). Our team's therapeutic approach is being discussed given the rarity of cases in the literature and the patient's anatomical characteristics. Surgical management in these situations must repair the unstable fracture while avoiding the aggravation of an existing or potential aortic injury. The aortic lesion can be treated first, before spinal fixation, either with open surgery, which carries a high risk of severe complications, or thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR), which allows the prevention of the potential aortic injury or repair of the existing aortic injury while minimizing the side effects of open surgery. However, endovascular surgery may have limitations due to individual vascular anatomy, as in our patient's case, which can prevent optimal endograft positioning and lead to risks such as endoleak, ischemia, infection, or thrombosis, necessitating periodic radiological follow-up. Endovascular repair is a new paradigm that has improved clinical outcomes for these patients by securing the vascular injury first before spinal surgery. Teamwork and multidisciplinary discussion ensure optimal safety, minimizing the side effects of these lesions, which can be fatal at any time during management.

Seat belt use and cardiac arrest immediately after motor vehicle collision: Nationwide observational study

Objective

Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are known to cause traumatic cardiac arrest; it is unclear whether seat belts prevent this. This study aimed to evaluate the association between seat belt use and immediate cardiac arrest in cases of MVCs.

Method

This cross-sectional observational study used data from a nationwide EMS-based severe trauma registry in South Korea. The sample comprised adult patients with EMS-assessed severe trauma due to MVCs between 2018 and 2019. The primary, secondary, and tertiary outcomes were immediate cardiac arrest, in-hospital mortality, and death or severe disability, respectively. We calculated the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of immediate cardiac arrest with seat belt use after adjusting for potential confounders.

Results

Among the 8178 eligible patients, 6314 (77.2 %) and 1864 (29.5 %) were wearing and not wearing seat belts, respectively. Immediate cardiac arrest, mortality, and death/severe disability rates were higher in the "no seat belt use" group than in the "seat belt use" group (9.4 % vs. 4.0 %, 12.4 % vs. 6.2 %, 17.7 % vs. 9.9 %, respectively; p < 0.001). The former group was more likely to experience immediate cardiac arrest (AOR [95 %CI]: 3.29 [2.65-4.08]), in-hospital mortality (AOR [95 %CI]: 2.72 [2.26-3.27]), and death or severe disability (AOR [95 %CI]: 2.40 [2.05-2.80]).

Conclusion

There was an association between wearing seat belts during MVCs and a reduced risk of immediate cardiac arrest.

[Management of Stent-graft migration with obstruction of supra-aortic vessel during an endovascular procedure for aortic isthmus rupture]

The endovascular approach is widely used in the management of aortic isthmic rupture. Even if it remains less invasive than conventional surgery, a life-threatening complications are possible. We report the case of a young female patient presenting a stent-graft migration during the deployment with total obstruction of the supra-aortic vessels. We describe the therapeutic management with a cerebral rescue procedure followed by a delayed surgical repair.

Surgeon-Modified Fenestrated Stent-grafts for Zone 2 Endovascular Repair of Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury: Early and Midterm Results

AIM

Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is a highly fatal surgical emergency and is treated with endovascular procedures. We aimed to analyze and report the early and midterm outcomes of surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-grafts (SMFSG) compared with other conventional endovascular methods in patients with BTAI repaired with zone 2 endovascular surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Before and after the study was performed, from January 2015 to January 2020 for a period in which conventional endovascular treatments were used and from January 2020 to January 2023 for the second period in which the SMFSG technique was used. A total of 25 patients who underwent zone 2 endovascular repair for BTAI were included. The patients treated with conventional endovascular methods in the first period, chimney thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) (n=3 patients); Left subclavian artery (LSA)-covered (intentionally total) (n=12 patients) LSA-covered (LSAC) TEVAR; carotid-subclavian bypass TEVAR (n=2 patients) was defined as group 1, and the group of patients treated with SMFSG in the second period was defined as group 2. The primary endpoints of the study were technical success, defined as complete closure of BTAI, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were aortic pathology-related morbidity, mortality, and re-interventions during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The mean age was 42.6±14.3 years, and 21 (84%) of the patients were male. The patients were compared with respect to the proximal landing zone, fluoroscopy time, duration of the procedure, length of intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay, no statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups (p>0.05). The mean follow-up time of patients in group I was 46±9 months, while in group II, it was 14±6 months (p<0.001). While no TEVAR-related complications were detected in group II throughout follow-up, they occurred in 4 patients (28.6%) in group I.

CONCLUSION

TEVAR is the most appropriate treatment for BTAI in the modern era, especially for polytrauma patients with successful outcomes. Intentional coverage of the LSA can be performed, but SMFSG is an effective, economical, rapid, and available technique for endovascular revascularization of the LSA.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Altough intentional left subclavian artery coverage is preferred routinely in patients with blunt traumatic aortic injury (in Zone 2) which is a highly fatal surgical emergency, surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-grafts is also effective, economical, rapid and available technique.

Civilian vascular trauma, treatment and outcome at a level 1-trauma centre

BACKGROUND

Outcomes after vascular injuries in wartime are well documented, but studies on vascular injuries in a civilian European populations are scarce.

METHODS

A retrospective study on all adults admitted to a North-European level 1-trauma centre 2009-2018 with The Abbreviated Injury Scale-codes for non-iatrogenic vascular trauma (VT). Data were extracted from both national and regional trauma-registries, as well as patient charts. Patient demographics, mechanism, and location of vascular injury were registered as well as its treatment. Incidence and injury scores (ISS, NISS and TRISS) were calculated and overall survival (Kaplan-Meier) estimated.

RESULTS

Of 4042 trauma-patients, 68 (1.7%) (median age 44 years, 76% males) sustained 81 vascular injuries (69 arterial; 12 venous); 46 blunt and 22 (32%) penetrating injuries. The total incidence of vascular injuries was 1.45/100,000 inhabitants and did not change over the study-period (95% confidence interval 1.13-1.82). The injuries were located in thorax (n = 17), neck (n = 16) and abdominal region (n = 15); most of the blunt injuries followed traffic (n = 31) or falling accidents (n = 10), and with 17 of the 22 penetrating injuries due to stabbing. The median ISS and NISS-scores were 22 and 33, with 50 (74%) and 55 (81%) patients having scores > 15, respectively. Forty-three (63%) patients had open surgical repair and 8 (12%) received endovascular treatment. Twenty-one patients died within 30-days (31%), 33% and 27% after blunt and penetrating injuries, respectively. Half of the patients that died within 24 h sustained aortic injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Traumatic vascular injuries are rare in civilian settings and are less than 2% of major trauma admissions. These patients are often seriously injured and their treatment can be challenging with high 30-day mortality.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

Observational management of Grade II or higher blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury: 15 years of experience at a single suburban institution

Background:

We aimed to investigate the outcomes after delayed management of ≥ Grade II blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTAI).

Methods:

Between January 2005 and December 2019, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 21 patients with ≥ Grade II thoracic aortic injury resulting from blunt trauma. Twelve patients underwent observation for the injury, whereas nine patients were transferred immediately after the diagnosis. Patients were divided into a nonoperative management group (n = 7) and delayed repair group (n = 5) based on whether they underwent thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair or surgery.

Results:

The most common dissection type was DeBakey classification IIIa (n = 9). Five patients underwent delayed surgery (including aneurysm repair), with observation periods ranging from 1 day to 36 months. The delayed repair group exhibited higher injury severity scores than the nonoperative management group (n = 7). The nonoperative management group was followed-up with blood pressure management without a change in status for a period ranging from 3 to 96 months.

Conclusions:

Our findings indicated that conservative management may be appropriate for select patients with Grade II/III BTAI, especially those exhibiting hemodynamic stability with anti-impulse therapy and minimally sized pseudoaneurysms. However, further studies are required to identify the risk factors for injury progression and long-term outcomes.

Damage control surgery for thoracic outlet vascular injuries: the new resuscitative median sternotomy plus REBOA

Thoracic vascular trauma is associated with high mortality and is the second most common cause of death in patients with trauma following head injuries. Less than 25% of patients with a thoracic vascular injury arrive alive to the hospital and more than 50% die within the first 24 hours. Thoracic trauma with the involvement of the great vessels is a surgical challenge due to the complex and restricted anatomy of these structures and its association with adjacent organ damage. This article aims to delineate the experience obtained in the surgical management of thoracic vascular injuries via the creation of a practical algorithm that includes basic principles of damage control surgery. We have been able to show that the early application of a resuscitative median sternotomy together with a zone 1 resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in hemodynamically unstable patients with thoracic outlet vascular injuries improves survival by providing rapid stabilization of central aortic pressure and serving as a bridge to hemorrhage control. Damage control surgery principles should also be implemented when indicated, followed by definitive repair once the correction of the lethal diamond has been achieved. To this end, we have developed a six-step management algorithm that illustrates the surgical care of patients with thoracic outlet vascular injuries according to the American Association of the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification.

Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries: a retrospective cohort analysis of 2 decades of experience

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyse and report the changes in the management of blunt traumatic aortic injuries (BTAIs) in a single centre during the last 2 decades.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with BTAI from January 1999 to January 2020 was performed. Data were collected from electronic/digitalized medical history records.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included [median age 42.4 years (16-84 years), 71.7% males]. The predominant cause of BTAI was car accidents (54.5%, n = 24) and all patients presented with concomitant injuries (93% bone fractures, 77.8% abdominal and 62.2% pelvic injuries). Over 70% presented grade III or IV BTAI. Urgent repair was performed in 73.8% of patients (n = 31), with a median of 2.75 h between admission and repair. Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) was performed in 87% (n = 49), open surgery (OS) in 10.9% (n = 5) and conservative management in 2.1% (n = 1). Technical success was 82.6% (92.1% TEVAR, 79% OS). In-hospital mortality was 19.5% (17.5% TEVAR, 40% OS). Of these, 3 died from aortic-related causes. Seven (15.2%) required an early vascular reintervention. The median follow-up was 34 months (1-220 months), with 19% of early survivors having a follow-up of >10 years. Only 1 vascular reintervention was necessary during follow-up: secondary TEVAR due to acute graft thrombosis. Of the patients who survived the initial event, 6.7% died during follow-up, none from aortic-related causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Even with all the described shortcomings, in our experience TEVAR for BTAI proved to be feasible and effective, with few complications and stable aortic reconstruction at mid-term follow-up. With the current technical expertise and wide availability of a variety of devices, it should be pursued as a first-line therapy in these challenging scenarios.

Early Characteristics and Progression of Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injuries at a Single Level I Trauma Center

OBJECTIVES

The most widely accepted grading system for blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) by the Society of Vascular Surgery (SVS) recommends endovascular repair for grade 2 and greater. Non-operative management in grade 2 injuries has been shown to be reasonable in certain circumstances. The natural history of low-grade injuries (1, 2) when managed non-operatively is not well defined.

METHODS

Utilizing our trauma registry, patients from 2013 to 2016 with blunt traumatic injury who underwent initial computed tomography were identified. Aortic pathology was graded and grouped by SVS classification. Clinical courses were reviewed for timing of interventions, repeat imaging, concurrent injuries, and outcomes. Analysis of variance and Chi-square tests of significance were utilized to compare between groups.

RESULTS

Out of 10,178 patients, we identified 32 with BTAI (grade: 1 (n = 13), 2 (n = 5), 3 (n = 3), 4 (n = 11)). High-grade injuries (3, 4) resulted only from motor vehicle, motorcycle, and pedestrian mechanisms. Initially, 9 patients (28%) required intervention, 5 (16%) were treated non-operatively, and 18 (56%) underwent repeat imaging. On repeat imaging, injuries that did not resolve remained stable and no injuries were found to progress. Of these patients, 9 (50%) required delayed intervention and 9 (50%) successfully underwent non-operative management. Patients with low-grade injuries were more likely to have successful non-operative management than those with high-grade injuries (72% vs 7%; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

While low-grade injuries generally have good outcomes, some ultimately do require delayed intervention, and short-term imaging is not reliable in identifying these cases.

Clinical Outcomes of the Seal® Thoracic Stent Graft for Traumatic Aortic Injury in a Korean Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) has been used as a primary treatment for blunt traumatic aortic injury (TAI). However, the outcomes of midterm surveillance of Seal® stent-graft durability for TAI have not been extensively studied. Thus, we aimed to report the midterm outcomes of TEVAR using the Seal® stent graft for blunt TAI.

METHODS

Patients with blunt TAI treated with TEVAR using the Seal® thoracic stent graft between 2007 and 2013 in Korea were included. Midterm outcomes included technical/clinical success, in-hospital death, aorta/procedure/device-related adverse events, secondary procedures, and 30-day and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 99 patients (54% men; mean age, 48 years) were included. Grade III or higher injuries were present in 95% of patients, including 15 free ruptures of the thoracic aorta, and 64% of injuries were located in zone III. The median procedure and hospitalization duration were 90 min and 11 days, respectively. The technical success rate was 98%. The number of in-hospital mortalities (n = 8) and stroke (n = 2) were observed at 30 days. Late stroke and paraplegia (>30 days) were not observed during the mean 49 ± 26 months of follow-up (median, 48 months; range, 0-117 months). There were no aorta-related mortalities or conversions to open repair. Secondary procedures were performed in 8 patients, all of which were carotid-subclavian bypasses for delayed left subclavian occlusion. The all-cause mortality rate was 5% at 30 days and 8% at 1 year. The survival rate was 95% at 30 days, 92% at 1 year, 92% at 3 years, and 89% at 5 years. One type Ia endoleak occurred at 18 months after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR with the Seal® stent graft for TAI showed favorable midterm outcomes. The incidence of major adverse events after the procedure was low.

The top 100 manuscripts in emergency cardiac surgery. Potential role in cardiothoracic training. A bibliometric analysis

Background

Emergency Cardiac Surgery (ECS) is a component of cardiothoracic training. Citations are considered to represent a papers influence. Bibliometric analyses allow us to identify the most influential work, and future research. We aim to highlight the key research themes within ECS and determine their potential impact on cardiothoracic training.

Methods

Thomas Reuters Web of Science was searched using terms [Emergency AND Card* AND Surg*]. Results were ranked by citation and reviewed by a panel of cardiac surgeons to identify the top 100 cited papers relevant to ECS. Papers were analysed by topic, journal and impact. Regression analysis was used to determine a link between impact factor and scientific impact.

Results

3823 papers were identified. Median citations for the top 100 was 88. The paper with the highest impact was by Nashef et al. focusing on the use of EuroSCORE (2043 citations). The Annals of Thoracic Surgery published most papers (n = 18:1778 citations). The European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery coveted the most citations (n = 2649). The USA published most papers (n = 55).The most ubiquitous topics were; risk stratification, circulatory support and aortic surgery. A positive relationship between journal impact fact and the scientific impact of manuscripts in ECS (P = 0.043) was deduced.

Conclusion

This study is the first of its kind and identified the papers which are likely to the contribute most to training and understanding of ECS. A papers influence is partially determined by journal impact factor. Bibliometric analysis is a potent tool to identify surgical training needs.

Fenestrated Endovascular Repair with Debranching Technique for Blunt Traumatic Isthmus Injury

Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) is a safe treatment alternative to open repair for blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI). A 29 year-old-female had multiple traffic injuries, including BTAI located in lesser curve of the isthmus close to the left common carotid artery with an isolated left vertebral artery. TEVAR with simple covering of the left subclavian artery was not adequate to prevent the endoleak. We considered fenestrated TEVAR with RELAY® PLUS to ensure blood flow to the left common carotid artery and reconstruction of the left isolated vertebral and left subclavian artery. The fenestrated TEVAR with a debranching technique provided good results without device-related complications.

Delay of computed tomography is associated with poor outcome in patients with blunt traumatic aortic injury: A nationwide observational study in Japan

According to guidelines from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, computed tomography (CT) with intravenous contrast is strongly recommended to diagnose clinically significant blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI). However, it remains unclear whether the timing of CT scanning is associated with the prognosis of BTAI patients.We extracted data on emergency patients who suffered a BTAI in the chest and/or the abdomen from 2004 to 2015 from the Japanese Trauma Data Bank, a nationwide trauma registry. The primary outcome was death in the emergency department (ED) and secondary outcome was discharge to death. In addition, we assessed the relationship between death in the ED and the timing of CT scanning by shock status in subgroup analysis. We divided these patients into the tertile groups of early (≤26 minutes), middle (27-40 minutes), and late (≥41 minutes) phases based on the time interval from hospital arrival to start of first CT scanning, and assessed death of BTAI patients in the ED by CT scanning time with the use of a multivariable logistic regression model.In total, 421 patients who suffered BTAI in the chest and/or the abdomen were eligible for our analysis. The proportion of patients dying at hospital admission was 7.7% (11/142) in the early group, 11.1% (15/135) in the middle group, and 17.6% (25/144) in the late group. In a multivariable logistic regression adjusted for confounding factors, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of death in the ED was 1.833 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.601-5.590, P = .287) in the middle group and 2.832 (95% CI: 1.007-7.960, P = .048) in the late group compared with the early group. Compared with the early group, the late group tended to have a higher rate of discharge to death (AOR: 1.438, 95% CI: 0.735-2.813). In the patients with shock, the AOR was 3.292 (95% CI: 0.495-21.902) in the middle group and 6.039 (95% CI: 0.990-36.837) in the late group compared with the early group.This study revealed that a longer time interval from hospital arrival to CT scanning was associated with higher mortality in the ED in patients with BTAI.

Endovascular Repair of Blunt Thoracic Aortic Trauma: Is Postimplant Hypertension an Incidental Finding?

BACKGROUND

Blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is the second most common cause of death in trauma patients. Nowadays, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become the treatment of choice because of lower rates of mortality, paraplegia, and stroke. However, concerns have been raised whether graft implantation is related to the development of hypertension in the postoperative period. The aim of this study was to report short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAIs at a tertiary hospital and to investigate postimplant hypertension.

METHODS

Between January 2005 and January 2016, 23 patients with blunt thoracic aortic trauma underwent TEVAR. Median age was 44 years (range, 18-73). Among them, 14 (60.9%) patients were diagnosed with aortic rupture, whereas 9 (39.1%) with pseudoaneurysm. Α single thoracic stent graft was deployed in 21 patients, and the rest 2 patients received 2 stent grafts.

RESULTS

Complete exclusion of the injury was feasible in all subjects (100% primary success). The left subclavian artery (SCA) was intentionally covered in 6 patients (26%). Intraoperative complications included one nonfatal stroke managed conservatively and one external iliac artery rupture treated with iliofemoral bypass. One patient (4.3%) died on the first postoperative day in the intensive care unit (ICU) because of hemorrhagic shock. The overall 30-day mortality and morbidity were 4.3% and 8.7%, respectively. New-onset postimplantation arterial hypertension was observed in 8 (34.8%) previously nonhypertensive patients. Younger age (P = 0.027) and SCA coverage (P = 0.01) were identified as potential risk factors for the development of postimplant hypertension, whereas the presence of concomitant injuries (P = 0.3) and intraoperative complications (P = 0.1) were not. After a median follow-up of 100 months (range, 18-120), 6 of them still remain on antihypertensive therapy, whereas the other 2 did not require permanent treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR is a safe approach in the treatment of BTAI associated with low short- and long-term morbidity and mortality rates. Lower age and SCA coverage may contribute to the development of postimplant hypertension. Further larger cohort studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of postimplant hypertension.

Nonoperative management rather than endovascular repair may be safe for grade II blunt traumatic aortic injuries: An 11-year retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The Society of Vascular Surgery (SVS) guidelines currently suggest thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for grade II-IV and nonoperative management (NOM) for grade I blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI). However, there is increasing evidence that grade II may also be observed safely. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of TEVAR and NOM for grade I-IV BTAI and determine if grade II can be safely observed with NOM.

METHODS

The records of patients with BTAI from 2004 to 2015 at a Level I trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were separated into two groups: TEVAR versus NOM. All BTAIs were graded according to the SVS guidelines. Minimal aortic injury (MAI) was defined as BTAI grade I and II. Failure of NOM was defined as aortic rupture after admission or progression on subsequent computed tomography (CT) imaging requiring TEVAR or open thoracotomy repair (OTR). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U and χ tests.

RESULTS

A total of 105 adult patients (≥16 years) with BTAI were identified over the 11-year period. Of these, 17 patients who died soon after arrival and 17 who underwent OTR were excluded. Of the remaining 71 patients, 30 had MAI (14 TEVAR vs. 16 NOM). There were no failures in either group. No patients with MAI in either group died from complications of aortic lesions. Follow-up CT imaging was performed on all MAI patients. Follow-up CT scans for all TEVAR patients showed stable stents with no leak. Follow-up CT in the NOM group showed progression in two patients neither required subsequent OTR or TEVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the SVS guidelines suggest TEVAR for grade II-IV and NOM for grade I BTAI, NOM may be safely used in grade II BTAI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV.

Thoracic aortic transection resulting in a type B dissection following blunt trauma

A 39-year-old man sustained an acute grade III aortic injury resulting in a type B aortic dissection in the setting of severe traumatic brain injury, cervical spine injury and multiple orthopaedic injuries following a motorcycle crash. The patient underwent an emergent thoracic endovascular aortic repair, complicated by a thoracic pseudoaneurysm rupture and ongoing exsanguination from a persistent type 1 endoleak. Additional stent grafts were required to gain control of the endoleak. The patient ultimately progressed to brain death post procedure in the intensive care unit. This case reviews treatment considerations in the context of a blunt thoracic aortic transection and distal dissection with concomitant polytrauma.

A case of blunt thoracic aortic injury requiring ECMO for acute malperfusion before TEVAR

BACKGROUND

Blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is associated with a high mortality rate and the paradigm of treating patients with BTAI currently favours thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) if possible. In BTAI, lethal malperfusion caused by a pseudoaneurysm has rarely been reported. We present the first report of a successful case in which a pseudoaneurysm causing the infrequent occurrence of lethal malperfusion and subsequent acute severe ischaemia in the distal portion of the thoracic descending aorta was overcome by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) as a bridging therapy until the initiation of TEVAR.

CASE PRESENTATION

An adult woman was transferred to our emergency room after injuries sustained by falling from height. Her vital signs were unstable on admission. CT examination revealed the multiple injuries: traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage, severe unstable pelvic fracture, and a grade III injury of the thoracic aorta. We made the decision to perform TEVAR after external fixation and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for the pelvic injury. During preparations for TEVAR, her lower limbs rapidly felt cold, and her blood lactate level and serum potassium rapidly increased. By the clinical data and ultrasonography and lower extremity Doppler, we diagnosed severe ischaemia in distal portion of the descending aorta caused by a pseudoaneurysm proximal to the descending thoracic aorta. Because we still had not prepared for TEVAR, we immediately started VA ECMO until TEVAR could begin. After the initiation of VA ECMO, her lactate and potassium levels could be controlled. Under VA ECMO support, she underwent TEVAR. After inpatient rehabilitation, she was discharged home without neurologic sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

VA ECMO could be an important, less-invasive treatment as a bridging therapy for acute severe malperfusion syndrome until TEVAR is initiated for BTAI.

Transcatheter Arterial Embolization of a Lumbar Artery Injury with Traumatic Aortic Dissection

Whole-body-enhanced computed tomography of a septuagenarian woman hit by a truck revealed a traumatic aortic dissection (Stanford B) and arterial bleeding from the right lumbar artery in the right iliopsoas muscle. Angiography revealed an active arterial extravasation from a false lumen of the left lumbar artery. We performed a transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) of the right lumbar artery. After fenestration of the intimal flap, the left lumbar artery was successfully selected and embolized; the patient's clinical condition subsequently stabilized. This is the first report of successful treatment of a lumbar artery injury with a traumatic aortic dissection by a TAE.

Endovascular Repair of Traumatic Isthmic Ruptures: Special Concerns

Injury of the aortic isthmus is the second most frequent cause of death in cases of blunt traumatic injury. Conventional open repair is related to significant morbidity and mortality. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has increasing role in traumatic isthmic rupture, as it avoids the thoracotomy-related morbidity, aortic cross clamping, and cardiopulmonary bypass. Additionally to the technical difficulties of open repair, multi-trauma patients may not tolerate the manipulations necessary to undergo open surgery, due to concomitant injuries. TEVAR is a procedure easier to perform compared to open surgery, despite that a considerable degree of expertise is necessary. Direct comparison of the two methods is difficult, but TEVAR appears to offer better results than open repair in terms of mortality, incidence of spinal cord ischemia, renal insufficiency, and graft infection. TEVAR is related to a-statistically not significant-trend for higher re-intervention rates during the follow-up period. Current guidelines support TEVAR as a first-line repair method for traumatic isthmic rupture. Certain specific considerations related to TEVAR, such as the timing of the procedure, the type and oversizing of the endograft, heparinization during the procedure, the necessity of cerebrospinal fluid drainage, type of anesthesia, and the necessary follow-up strategy remain to be clarified. TEVAR should be considered advantageous compared to open surgery, but future developments in endovascular materials, along with accumulating long-term clinical data, will eventually improve TEVAR results in traumatic aortic isthmic rupture (TAIR) cases. This publication reviews the role, outcomes, and relevant issues linked to TEVAR in the repair of TAIR.

Emergency endovascular management of acute thoracic aortic pathology A safe and feasible option

Endovascular repair has revolutionised the emergency treatment of thoracic aortic disease. We report our 10 year experience using this treatment in emergency cases. A prospectively maintained vascular database was analysed. Patients' medical records and CT images stored on the hospital PACS system were also reviewed. Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS V21. There were a total of 59 thoracic aortic stenting procedures of which 33 (60% males with a mean age of 58 yrs) were performed for emergency thoracic pathologies: traumatic transection (n = 10), ruptured aneurysm (n = 6), non-traumatic dissection (n = 8) and penetrating aortic ulcer (n = 9). All patients had self-expanding endografts implanted. Two patients required debranching procedures before the endovascular treatment. Thirty-day mortality was 12.1% (4/33). 70% of patients received a single device. There were 7 procedure related complications, 6 requiring re-intervention: thoracotomy and drainage in 2 patients, proximal graft extension in 2, open drainage of groin haematoma in 1 and open repair of a common femoral artery pseudo-aneurysm in one patient. In total 23 patients were transferred from 11 centres nationwide. There were no mortalities or other complications related to patient transfer from peripheral centres. Although acute thoracic aortic pathology is life threatening, appropriate blood pressure management and treatment of associated injuries can result in favourable outcomes. Endovascular repair is a safe and effective treatment option which enables patients to be treated with reduced morbidity and mortality. Transfer of patients with acute pathology to a tertiary centre can safely be performed.

Bedside identification of blunt thoracic aortic injury with point-of-care transesophageal echocardiography

Trauma point-of-care ultrasound in the form of the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) exam and its evolution into extended FAST have significantly enhanced the diagnostic power of evaluation and resuscitation of the trauma patient; however, these modalities still have limitations in evaluating mediastinal and cardiac pathology. This report demonstrates a case of point-of-care transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of blunt thoracic aortic injury in an unstable patient involved in a motor vehicle collision.

Experience of endovascular repair of thoracic aortic dissection after blunt trauma injury in a district general hospital

BACKGROUND

Traumatic thoracic aortic dissection is uncommon in clinical practice; however, it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Thoracic aortic dissection is usually caused by sudden deceleration resulting from a traffic accident or fall. Aortic injury after blunt trauma is a critical condition. This study reported the outcomes of endovascular repair of acute traumatic aortic dissection in patients at a district general hospital.

METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of eight patients with acute traumatic aortic dissection after a blunt trauma who had undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) between January 2012 and December 2015 at a district general hospital in Taiwan.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 49±22 years (range, 20-77 years), and 6 of the 8 (75%) patients were men. Five patients were involved in traffic accidents, and 3 patients had fallen from heights. The injury severity score (ISS) of the patients ranged from 17 to 66. In all patients, the aortic injury was located near the origin of the left subclavian artery (LSA). Four patients had seal ostium of subclavian artery, left. None of the patients developed paraplegia or lower extremity ischemia. Moreover, all patients had concomitant injuries, and no patients died postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular repair is a rapid and minimally invasive therapy for patients with traumatic aortic injury and is associated with favorable technical results.

Timing of Intervention in Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury Patients: Open Surgical versus Endovascular Repair

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a rapidly evolving therapy in treating blunt traumatic aortic injury (TAI). However, currently there is no consensus among literature regarding the repair timing of TAI. Our experiences to manage TAI with comparison between open surgical and endovascular repair in repair timing and short-term outcomes are reported. Risk factors for postoperative mortality and morbidity are stratified.

METHODS

Between January 2003 and February 2014, 63 consecutive patients who have suffered from TAI and underwent conventional open surgical or endovascular aortic repair were retrospectively reviewed in this study. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, postoperative complication, and operation timing. All medical records regarding trauma mechanisms, concomitant injuries, intervention detail, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 63 patients (mean age, 37.9 years; 57 male), 23 underwent open repair (OR) and 40 underwent TEVAR for blunt TAI. The TEVAR group had more urgent operation (injury to repair <24 hr; 57.5% vs. 30.4%, P = 0.038) and shorter operative time (136.25 ± 54.48 min vs. 414.78 ± 212.24 min, P = 0.00) than the respective open surgical repair group. Postoperative mortality and morbidity analysis showed that the OR group had higher in-hospital mortality (30.4% vs. 7.5%; P = 0.029), more patients with acute renal failure in need of hemodialysis (17.4% vs. 2.3%; P = 0.038), and more post-operation infection (30.4% vs. 5%; P = 0.005) than the respective TEVAR group. The Multivariate analysis, of the 10 (15.88%) patients that died after the surgery, showed that the risk factors of hospital mortality were grade IV TAI (frank rupture).

CONCLUSIONS

For treating TAI, TEVAR has emerged as a quicker and safer treatment option than OR. The findings of this study support the use of TEVAR over OR for patients who suffered from TAI.

Multidetector computer tomography: evaluation of blunt chest trauma in adults

Imaging plays an essential part of chest trauma care. By definition, the employed imaging technique in the emergency setting should reach the correct diagnosis as fast as possible. In severe chest blunt trauma, multidetector computer tomography (MDCT) has become part of the initial workup, mainly due to its high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of the technique for the detection and characterization of thoracic injuries and also due to its wide availability in tertiary care centers. The aim of this paper is to review and illustrate a spectrum of characteristic MDCT findings of blunt traumatic injuries of the chest including the lungs, mediastinum, pleural space, and chest wall.

Intentional left subclavian artery coverage during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for traumatic aortic injury

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is widely used for treatment of traumatic aortic injury (TAI). Stent graft coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSA) may be required in up to 40% of patients. We evaluated the long-term effects of intentional LSA coverage (LSAC) on symptoms and return to normal activity in TAI patients compared with a similarly treated group whose LSA was uncovered (LSAU).

METHODS

Patients were identified from a prospective institutional trauma registry between September 2005 and July 2012. TAI was confirmed using computed tomography angiography. The electronic medical records, angiograms, and computed tomography angiograms were reviewed in a retrospective fashion. In-person or telephone interviews were conducted using the SF-12v2 (Quality Metrics, Lincoln, RI) to assess quality of life. An additional questionnaire was used to assess specific LSA symptoms and the ability to return to normal activities. Data were analyzed by Spearman rank correlation and multiple linear and logistic regression analysis with appropriate transformations using SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

During the study period, 82 patients (57 men; mean age 40.5 ± 20 years, mean Injury Severity Score, 34 ± 10.0) underwent TEVAR for treatment of TAI. Among them, LSAC was used in 32 (39.5%) and LSAU in 50. A group of the LSAU patients (n = 22) served as matched controls in the analysis. We found no statistically significant difference in SF-12v2 physical health scores (ρ = -0.08; P = .62) between LSAC and LSAU patients. LSAC patients had slightly better mental health scores (ρ = 0.62; P = .037) than LSAU patients. LSAC patients did not have an increased likelihood of experiencing pain (ρ = -0.0056; P = .97), numbness (ρ = -0.12; P = .45), paresthesia (ρ = -0.11; P = .48), fatigue (ρ = -0.066; P = .69), or cramping (ρ = -0.12; P = .45). We found no difference between groups in the ability to return to activities. The mean follow-up time was 3.35 years. Six LSAC patients (19%) died during the follow-up period of unrelated causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Intentional LSAC during TEVAR for TAI appears safe, without compromising mental or physical health outcomes. Furthermore, LSAC does not increase the long-term risk of upper extremity symptoms or impairment of normal activities.

Natural history of grade I-II blunt traumatic aortic injury

BACKGROUND

Endovascular aortic repair has revolutionized the management of traumatic blunt aortic injury (BAI). However, debate continues about the extent of injury requiring endovascular repair, particularly with regard to minimal aortic injury. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective observational analysis of our experience with these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all BAI presenting to an academic level I trauma center over a 10-year period (2000-2010). Images were reviewed by a radiologist and graded according to Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines (grade I-IV). Demographics, injury severity, and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

We identified 204 patients with BAI of the thoracic or abdominal aorta. Of these, 155 were deemed operative injuries at presentation, had grade III-IV injuries or aortic dissection, and were excluded from this analysis. The remaining 49 patients had 50 grade I-II injuries. We managed 46 grade I injuries (intimal tear or flap, 95%), and four grade II injuries (intramural hematoma, 5%) nonoperatively. Of these, 41 patients had follow-up imaging at a mean of 86 days postinjury and constitute our study cohort. Mean age was 41 years, and mean length of stay was 14 days. The majority (48 of 50, 96%) were thoracic aortic injuries and the remaining two (4%) were abdominal. On follow-up imaging, 23 of 43 (55%) had complete resolution of injury, 17 (40%) had no change in aortic injury, and two (5%) had progression of injury. Of the two patients with progression, one progressed from grade I to grade II and the other progressed from grade I to grade III (pseudoaneurysm). Mean time to progression was 16 days. Neither of the patients with injury progression required operative intervention or died during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Injury progression in grade I-II BAI is rare (~5%) and did not cause death in our study cohort. Given that progression to grade III injury is possible, follow-up with repeat aortic imaging is reasonable.

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in polytrauma patients

PURPOSE

The clinical outcome of polytrauma patients underwent spine fixation was analyzed and correlated both to surgical time (early versus delayed) and to fixation type (open versus percutaneous).

METHODS

Twenty-four polytrauma patients were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were evaluated according to age, accident dynamic, mechanical ventilation need, blood transfusion need, SAPS II score, type of vertebral injury, time of fixation (within or after 72 h) and type of fixation.

RESULTS

Nine patients underwent percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and 12 open fusion. An early fixation allows better clinical outcome considering ICU stay (13.7 versus 21.71 days), H-LOS (25.8 versus 69.5 days), mechanical ventilation need (7 versus 16.2), blood transfusion need (250 versus 592 cc).

CONCLUSIONS

In polytrauma patients an early spine fixation improves clinical outcome. Patients underwent percutaneous screw fixation showed a better outcome compared to open surgery group obtained despite worst clinical conditions.

Trend of management of traumatic thoracic aortic injuries in a single center

The purpose of this study was to review the shift in the trend of management and mid-term outcomes of all patients who sustain thoracic aortic injury. A Retrospective analysis was performed of all patients sustaining blunt thoracic aortic trauma admitted to our unit. Forty-seven patients were presented with injury to the thoracic aorta following blunt chest injury. Ten patients underwent open surgical repair of their thoracic aortic injury. The mean age ± SD (range) was 29.4 ± 7.9 years (18-41) with a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 41 ± 14.7 (25-75). Fifteen patients underwent thoracic endovascular repair for blunt aortic transections with a mean age of 35.1 ± 14.5 years (17-65), mean ISS of 40.8 ± 13.9 (20-75) and an average length of hospital stay of 25.6 ± 14.5 days (3-77). The mean aortic diameter proximal to the aortic injury was 23.46 ± 3.02 mm (19-28) with a mean aortic angulation of 58.46° ± 17.73 (44-80°). The mean oversizing was 24.4 ± 5.4% (17-32%). At our institution, there has been a paradigm shift in the emergent repair of blunt thoracic aortic injury from open surgery to endovascular repair. Oversizing of the stent-graft did not translate to a poorer outcome.

Surgical management of traumatic rupture of aortic isthmus: a 25-year experience

OBJECTIVE

Traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta is a surgical emergency with a high mortality rate. This condition requires prompt diagnosis and expeditious evaluation to improve patient survival. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of early and late management of traumatic rupture of aortic isthmus in patients with blunt thoracic trauma.

METHODS

Between February 1980 and June 2005, 64 patients sustained blunt thoracic trauma underwent open surgical repair for traumatic rupture of the aortic isthmus (7 women, 57 men, and mean age 38 ± 14.3 years). Clinical signs of diagnostic principles in our series of patients were: chest pain and dyspnea (48.5 %), hemoptysis (23.5 %), and hypotension (15.5 %). All patients underwent a left posterolateral thoracotomy through the fourth or fifth intercostal space or median sternotomy. Extracorporeal circulation for spinal cord protection was installed in all patients.

RESULTS

Of the 64 patients identified over the 25-year study period, 15 (23.5 %) underwent direct suture, 48 (75 %) underwent interposition graft repair, and 1 (1.5 %) experienced patch aortoplasty repair. The overall hospital mortality rate for the entire patient was 3 % due to multiple organ failure and myocardial infarction. No paraplegia occurred postoperatively. Three patients died during the follow-up period, two from myocardial infarction, and one from acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Traumatic aortic rupture remains a potentially lethal injury and an ongoing therapeutic challenge. Open surgical technique to repair the traumatic rupture of aorta is a safe procedure: postoperative outcome was excellent and the complications observed that were with aortic endoprosthetic stent-grafts were avoided.

Imaging vascular trauma

Background

Over the past 50 years the management of vascular trauma has changed from mandatory surgical exploration to selective non-operative treatment, where possible. Accurate, non-invasive, diagnostic imaging techniques are the key to this strategy. The purpose of this review was to define optimal first-line imaging in patients with suspected vascular injury in different anatomical regions.

Methods

A systematic review was performed of literature relating to radiological diagnosis of vascular trauma over the past decade (2000–2010). Studies were included if the main focus was initial diagnosis of blunt or penetrating vascular injury and more than ten patients were included.

Results

Of 1511 titles identified, 58 articles were incorporated in the systematic review. Most described the use of computed tomography angiography (CTA). The application of duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging/angiography and transoesophageal echocardiography was described, but significant drawbacks were highlighted for each. CTA displayed acceptable sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing vascular trauma in blunt and penetrating vascular injury within the neck and extremity, as well as for blunt aortic injury.

Conclusion

Based on the evidence available, CTA should be the first-line investigation for all patients with suspected vascular trauma and no indication for immediate operative intervention.

Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic injury: current thoughts and technical considerations

Thoracic aortic traumatic injury is a highly morbid event. Mortality and paraplegia rates after emergent open repair remain high. Now, however, thoracic aortic endografting for trauma (TAET) is commonly used. It is appealing due to reduction of operative stress for the multiply injured trauma victim. This minimizing of stress and risk is secondary to avoidance of thoracotomy, single-lung ventilation, aortic cross-clamping, and the more complex anesthetic techniques required. Early and midterm results from TAET delineate improved outcomes, yet access and aortic constraints continue to challenge TAET. Questions regarding longer-term durability of endografts in younger patients remain unanswered. Broader application of TAET within endovascular programs is challenged by appropriate imaging, operating suite inventories, and the logistics and personnel required for TAET. Currently developed thoracic endograft devices are not ideal for TAET due to platform size and graft diameter. This is changing, however, as new modifications have been developed and trials are ongoing. In light of these collective factors, the management paradigm for traumatic aortic injury is beginning to favor TAET.

Role of conservative management in traumatic aortic injury: comparison of long-term results of conservative, surgical, and endovascular treatment

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to compare early and long-term results in terms of survival and cardiovascular complications of patients with acute traumatic aortic injury who were conservatively managed with patients who underwent surgical or endovascular repair.

METHODS

From January 1980 to December 2009, 66 patients with acute traumatic aortic injury were divided into 3 groups according to treatment intention at admission: 37 patients in a conservative group, 22 patients in a surgical group, and 7 patients in an endovascular group. Groups were similar with regard to gender, age, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, and Trauma Injury Severity Score.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was 21.6% in the conservative group, 22.7% in the surgical group, and 14.3% in the endovascular group (P = .57). In-hospital aortic-related complications occurred only in the conservative group. Median follow-up time was 75 months (range, 5-327 months). Conservative group survival was 75.6% at 1 year, 72.3% at 5 years, and 66.7% at 10 years. Surgical group survival remained at 77.2% at 1, 5, and 10 years, whereas survival in the endovascular group was 85.7% at 1 and 5 years (P = .18). No patient in the surgical or endovascular group required reintervention because of aortic-related complications, whereas 37.9% of the conservative group had an aortic-related complication that required surgery or caused the patient's death during the follow-up period. Cumulative survival free from aortic-related complications in the conservative group was 93% at 1 year, 88.5% at 5 years, and 51.2% at 10 years. Cox regression confirmed the initial type of aortic lesion (hazard ratio, 2.94; P = .002) and a Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score greater than 50% on admission (hazard ratio, 1.49; P = .042) as risk factors for the appearance of aortic-related complications. Two peaks in the complication rate of the conservative group were detected in the first week and between the first and third months after blunt thoracic trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

The advent of thoracic aortic endografting has enabled a revolution in the management of acute traumatic aortic injury in patients with multisystem trauma with a low in-hospital morbimortality. Nonoperative management may be only a therapeutic option with acceptable survival in carefully selected patients. The natural history of these patients has revealed a marked trend of late aortic-related complications developing, which may justify an endovascular repair even in some low-risk patients.

A multicenter experience of the management of collapsed thoracic endografts

OBJECTIVES

Thoracic endograft collapse after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a potentially devastating complication. This study evaluates the management of thoracic stent graft collapse.

METHODS

A multicenter review of thoracic stent graft collapse was performed from 2005 to 2009. Diagnosis and preoperative planning was performed by computed tomography angiography (CTA). Outcome measures included success of endovascular salvage, postoperative complications, and conversion to open repair.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (10 men) with thoracic endograft collapse were identified. Mean age was 41.2 years old (range, 21-66 years). Indications for the index TEVAR were traumatic aortic transections in 8 patients and acute type B dissections in 3 patients. All were initially treated with the TAG endoprosthesis (Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz). The median duration from initial repair to diagnosis of collapse was 9 days (range, 1 day-38 months). All collapses were initially treated by endovascular means using another TAG device in 7 patients, a Talent (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif) thoracic stent graft in 3 patients, and a Palmaz (Cordis Endovascular, Warren, NJ) stent in 1 patient. In 1 patient, the secondary TAG did not resolve the collapse and required a Palmaz stent placement. Technical success rate was 91%, while re-expansion of the collapsed endograft was achieved in all patients. Early and late complications were observed in 3 patients. Delayed (>30 days) open conversion with device explantation was performed for an aortoesophageal fistula, physiological aortic coarctation, and prevention of a recurrent collapse in 1 patient each. There were no perioperative deaths or recurrent collapses.

CONCLUSION

Endograft collapse can be successfully managed by endovascular techniques in most cases. Redo-TEVAR using high radial force devices should be considered the initial treatment of choice. Late endograft-related complications after treatment of collapsed endografts are not uncommon and can be safely managed by open conversion.

Treating blunt aortic injuries with endografts: pros and cons of a meta-analysis

Modern management of blunt aortic injury (BAI) is based on evidence from mostly well-conducted meta-analyses as surrogates for prospective randomized controlled trials. There are several obvious pros and cons to this strategy. The advantages rest on the fact that it is unlikely that a prospective randomized trial comparing open surgical repair with endovascular repair will ever be conducted based on ethical grounds and the apparent survival advantage and reduced paraplegia rates associated with an endovascular approach; pooled data from high-volume studies provides for higher statistical power; and a well-conducted meta-analysis provides the ability to control for inter-study variation. The disadvantages of this approach are that meta-analyses are statistical examinations of scientific studies and not scientific studies in and of themselves; sources of bias cannot be controlled by the method of the analysis; and a heavy reliance on published studies can create exaggerated outcomes. Nonetheless, the studies reviewed in this article offer the best glimpse yet at the truth. The evidence grade to support endovascular over open repair for BAI is Level II (intermediate), which suggests that the described effect is plausible but is not quantified precisely or may be vulnerable to bias. The recommendation grade is B (provisional recommendation), which suggests that on balance of the evidence, endovascular repair for BAI is recommended with caution.

Stent-graft repair for blunt traumatic aortic injury as the new standard of care: is there evidence?

Designed to treat degenerative aneurysms of the thoracic and abdominal aorta, endovascular stent-grafts have been increasingly employed as an off-label emergency treatment for blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI). In this review we explore the controversies associated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for BTAI. Early versus delayed treatment of aortic injuries is controversial, and stent-graft repair has further confused the issue of timing the repair. The diagnosis and management of minimal aortic injuries remains elusive. We analyze the available literature pertaining to BTAI, including the recent multicenter prospective trial from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. The strengths and weaknesses of the stent-grafts currently available for use in the US are examined to provide insight into which graft may be best suited for BTAI at the present time. Also of importance, we offer recommendations regarding clinical situations in which TEVAR should not be the first line therapy for BTAI. We conclude with a discussion of upcoming trials and new devices that will shape the future of endovascular treatment of BTAI.

Endovascular treatment of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury

Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTTAI) is a lethal injury associated with a prehospital mortality of 80% to 90%. Patients arriving in the emergency room and considered appropriate to undergo emergency open surgical repair still have a mortality rate of 15% to 30% because of severe associated injuries. Conventional open surgical repair requires a left thoracotomy, single lung ventilation, aortic-cross clamping and unclamping, with or without the adjunct use of partial or full cardiopulmonary bypass and systemic heparinization. All this leads to significant physiological stress and surgical trauma resulting in perioperative complications such as major blood loss, coagulopathy, myocardial infarction, stroke, respiratory failure, renal failure, bowel infarction, and paraplegia. Despite advances in anesthesia, critical care medicine, and surgical techniques, a recent meta-analysis showed no definite improvement in operative mortality over the past decade, following open surgical repair in patients with BTTAI. Endovascular repair of BTTAI does not require a thoracotomy, single lung ventilation, aorticcross clamping and unclamping, or systemic heparinization. As a result, endovascular repair of BTTAI has emerged as an effective, minimally invasive treatment alternative, especially in patients with severe concomitant injuries, which may be prohibitive to open surgical repair. Recent published studies have shown that endovascular repair of BTTAI is associated with lower morbidity, mortality, stroke, and paraplegia/paraparesis rates, when compared with open surgical repair of BTTAI.