Surgical complications of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Does laparoscopic omentectomy reduce CAPD catheter malfunction: A three-arm pilot randomized trial

Introduction:

Catheter malfunction secondary to omental wrapping is a frequent complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Of the various methods of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion (PDCI), open surgical insertion under local anesthesia is most widely practiced. Laparoscopic omentectomy is often undertaken as a salvage procedure in case of malfunctioning catheters. However, there is no randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the role of prophylactic laparoscopic omentectomy on catheter function. This pilot RCT was undertaken to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic omentectomy on the incidence of catheter malfunction.

Materials and Methods:

Consecutive patients were randomized into three groups: laparoscopic PDCI with omentectomy (Group A), laparoscopic PDCI without omentectomy (Group B) and open surgical PDCI (Group C). The primary outcome was the incidence of catheter malfunction at 6 weeks and 3 months.

Results:

Forty-one patients completed follow-up, with 16, 11, and 14 patients in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Incidence of catheter malfunction was 6.2%, 27.3%, and 14.3% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively, at 6 weeks and 6.2%, 36.4%, and 21.4% at 3 months, respectively. In patients with previously failed catheter insertion (n = 23), malfunction at 3 months was 8.3% (1/12) in patients who had omentectomy, compared with 45.5% (5/11) in those who did not (P = 0.069). Operating time was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in Group A.

Conclusions:

Laparoscopic omentectomy may be associated with a lower incidence of catheter malfunction, especially in patients with previously failed peritoneal dialysis catheter. Data from this pilot RCT can be used to design a large trial with an adequate number of patients.

Omentectomy reduces the need for peritoneal dialysis catheter revision in children: a study from the Pediatric Nephrology Research Consortium

BACKGROUND

There are no multi-center studies examining omentectomy and peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter revision in the pediatric dialysis population.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study at eight centers within the Pediatric Nephrology Research Consortium (PNRC). Data review included all incident tunneled PD catheters placed between 1/1/2011 and 12/31/2016 in pediatric stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD 5) patients. The primary outcome was the need for catheter revision and/or replacement. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate predictors for catheter revision/replacement.

RESULTS

Data from 184 children (62.5% male; median age 7.4 years) were analyzed. Omentectomy was completed in 63.6% (n = 117). Revision/replacement occurred in 34.2% (n = 63); median time to revision/replacement was 38.5 days after insertion. PD catheter revision/replacement catheter occurred in 23.9% who underwent omentectomy versus 52.2% without omentectomy (p = 0.0005). Children ≥ 6 years at the time of catheter insertion experienced fewer revisions/replacements (18.2% age ≥ 6 vs. 56.5% age < 6 years, p <0.001). After adjusting for covariates, omentectomy reduced the need for revision by 63%; revision was 3.66 times more likely in those < 6 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

This multi-center study demonstrates that omentectomy at the time of PD catheter insertion in pediatric patients is strongly associated with reduced likelihood of PD catheter revision. Omentectomy should be considered at the time of PD catheter insertion, especially in young children who are at high risk for PD catheter malfunction. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

An analysis of the "Half-Perc" versus open surgical placement method for a peritoneal dialysis catheter: a non-inferiority cohort study

Background

Most end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergo open surgical techniques for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement. An alternative method to PD catheter implantation is the half-percutaneous (“Half-Perc”) technique based on a modified trocar that is performed by a nephrologist. The single-center, retrospective, observational, cohort study presented here aimed to compare the effects of the “Half-Perc” technique with the traditional open surgery on peritoneal catheter insertion.

Methods

From January 2015 to January 2018, 240 ESRD patients who received initial PD catheter placement were divided into two groups based on the “Half-Perc” technique or open surgery. All patients were followed up for 365 days or until loss of initial PD catheter or death. Prism 5 software was used to analyze baseline characteristics, operation-related parameters, mechanical complications and clinical outcomes.

Results

The “Half-Perc” technique showed shorter operation time, shorter incision length, lower postoperative pain scores and quick initiation of the PD program compared to the open surgery. After the 365-day follow-up, the “Half-Perc” group showed a higher rate of catheter dysfunction (4% versus 0.9%) that was corrected by conservative treatment in most patients and a lower rate of peritonitis (4% versus 9.6%) but mechanical complications and clinical outcomes did not differ between the two groups. There was also no significant difference based on overall patient mortality or catheter removal. One-year initial catheter survival and true catheter survival were not statistically different between the groups.

Conclusion

The “Half-Perc” placement of the PD catheter using a modified metal trocar appears to be a non-inferior alternative method and carries minimal invasiveness and risk compared to open surgical placement.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement, an Improvement on the Single Trocar Technique

In 2002, Ochsner laparoscopic surgeons and nephrologists began placing peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters via a laparoscopic-assisted method. We compared laparoscopically placed PD catheters (LAPD) with catheters most recently placed without laparoscopic aid (STPD). The method for this study is a retrospective chart review. Demographics of both groups were similar. Nine of 20 (45%) in the STPD group and 16 of 23 (70%) in the LAPD group had had previous abdominal surgery. Three of 20 (15%) of STPD had complications, including one small bowel injury. Four of 23 (17.4%) of the LAPD had complications. One of 20 (5%) in the STPD group and 3 of 23 (13%) in the LAPD group had dialysate leaks. In the STPD group, 8 of 20 (40%) had catheter problems that led to removal in 7 (35%). In the LAPD group, 6 of 23 (26%) had catheter malfunction: 3 were salvaged with a laparoscopic procedure; 3 (13%) were removed for malfunction. 1) LAPD allows proper PD placement after complex abdominal surgery; 2) Although dialysate leak complications are increased, bowel perforation risk is less; 3) Because of proper placement, PD catheter malfunction rate is less with LAPD; 4) Although no results obtained statistical significance, we found LAPD superior to STPD and have converted to this technique.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using multifunctional bladder paracentesis trocar: A modified percutaneous PD catheter placement technique

Background

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound‐guided percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using multifunctional bladder paracentesis trocar.

Methods

A retrospective review of 103 ESRD patients receiving percutaneous PD catheter insertion using a multifunctional bladder paracentesis trocar under ultrasound guidance at a single center between May 2016 and May 2018. Mechanical complications and catheter survival were evaluated over a 12‐month follow‐up.

Result

Catheterization using this technique required only 10‐30 minutes from the beginning of local anesthesia to the end of skin suture at the puncture site (mean 18 ± 7 minutes) and an incision length of 2‐4 cm. Moreover, only four of 103 cases required catheter removal due to poor drainage within one month after surgery, with a success rate of 96.19%. Among failures, omentum wrapping was cause in two cases, catheter displacement in one case, and protein clot blockage in one case, while there were no instances of organ injury, severe hemorrhage, peritubular leakage, hernia, peritonitis, or exit infection within one month of PD catheter insertion. Catheter survival at 1 year was 92.2%.

Conclusion

Percutaneous PD catheter insertion using a multifunctional bladder paracentesis trocar and ultrasound guidance is a feasible technique for ESRD patients.

Minilaparoscopic Extraperitoneal Tunneling with Omentopexy: A New Technique for CAPD Catheter Placement

Background

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is an effective form of treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Open insertion of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters is the standard surgical technique, but it is associated with a relatively high incidence of catheter-related problems. To overcome these problems, different laparoscopic techniques have been presented, being preferable to the open and percutaneous methods.

Objective

To introduce and evaluate the efficiency of laparoscopic omental fixation and extraperitoneal placement of the cuff–coil part (the straight portion) of the catheter to prevent catheter tip migration, pericatheter leakage, severe abdominal pain, and the obstruction caused by omental wrapping.

Setting

The study was carried out in the General Surgery Department, Akdeniz University Medical School, in Turkey.

Patients and Methods

Between November 2001 and March 2005, the technique was applied in 44 consecutive patients (mean age 51.6 years, range 18 – 67 years) with end-stage renal disease. During this laparoscopic technique, the omentum was first fixed onto the parietal peritoneum, and then the catheter was introduced through the subumbilical trocar site into the posterior rectus compartment and advanced toward the symphysis pubis. The catheter was then inserted into the abdominal cavity, passing the peritoneal opening, which was prepared before catheter insertion. The straight portion of the catheter was located into the extraperitoneal area of the anterior abdominal wall. The curled end, which contains the side-holes of the catheter, was placed into the true pelvis. Catheter position and patency were verified under direct vision using a 2 mm telescope.

Results

All procedures were completed laparoscopically. Operating time ranged between 40 and 100 minutes (median 52 minutes). There was no intraoperative complication or surgical mortality. Peritoneal dialysis was initiated within 15 – 24 hours after catheter implantation. After a median follow-up period of 17.4 months (range 1 – 38 months), early exit-site infection occurred in 1 of 44 patients. All catheters functioned well postoperatively. There was no pain during CAPD.

Conclusion

This new laparoscopic technique using an extraperitoneal approach with omentopexy for PD catheter placement could prove extremely useful for preventing catheter malfunction caused by catheter tip migration, pericatheter leakage, omental wrapping, and periodic catheter movement that causes abdominal pain in CAPD.

Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Complications

A functional peritoneal dialysis catheter is essential for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis to be an effective form of dialysis. The most common mechanical problems that hinder adequate function include obstruction, leaks, hernias, hemoperitoneum, and pain. The reported incidence of mechanical problems varies from 12% to 73%. Symptoms, diagnostic tests, risk factors, and treatment strategies are reviewed. Surgical intervention and catheter replacement are often required to resolve mechanical problems. Avoidance of mechanical problems reduces the risk of interruptions in peritoneal dialysis therapy.

Urine producing peritoneal dialysis catheter

Insertion of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter into the bladder is a rare complication of PD. Herein, we describe a case of an adult patient undergoing PD tube insertion who was found to have the catheter in the urinary bladder. He was treated with PD catheter removal, prophylactic antibiotics and repair of the bladder wall. This report gives a timely reminder of and the need to check for urinary bladder distension prior to PD catheter insertion surgery. Perforating injuries should be considered in patients with symptoms related to the urinary tract and free flow of fluid from the PD tube.

Modified Simple Peritoneal Wall Anchor Technique (PWAT) in Peritoneal Dialysis

♦ BACKGROUND: Outflow obstruction, a common complication in patients with peritoneal dialysis (PD), usually results in unnecessary catheter removal or replacement. This study describes a modified simple method of anchoring a PD catheter on the anterior peritoneal wall without using a laparoscopic system (peritoneal wall anchor technique, PWAT). ♦ METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive PD catheter insertions, and compared the catheter survival rate between the traditional method and the modified simple PWAT. The traditional method was used in 54 cases and the modified simple PWAT was used in 17 cases. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of surgical catheter repair because of outflow obstruction by day 365. The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of catheter migration with obstruction requiring any interventions, including the alpha-replacement method by day 365. Catheter survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. ♦ RESULTS: Migration-free catheter survival was significantly (p = 0.02) higher in the PWAT group (100%, 17/17) than in the traditional group (72.2%, 39/54). Catheter survival without surgical repair or cessation of PD was also significantly (p = 0.04) higher in the PWAT group (100%, 17/17) than in the traditional group (77.8%, 42/54). Similarly, migration-free and surgery-free catheter survival rates in cases with a straight-type catheter in the PWAT group were significantly higher than those in cases with a straight-type catheter in the traditional group. ♦ CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the modified simple PWAT provides a better catheter survival rate than the traditional method by preventing catheter migration with obstruction in PD.

Vertical Tunnel-based Low-site Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Implantation Decreases the Incidence of Catheter Malfunction

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is often complicated by catheter dysfunction. We designed a PD catheter implantation technique to reduce catheter dysfunction. Between June 2008 and 2012, 89 patients with end-stage renal disease were enrolled into a prospective study and randomly assigned to receive traditional catheter implantation by open surgery (n = 41) or vertical tunnel-based low-site PD catheter implantation (n = 48). Both procedures used Baxter straight double-cuffed Tenckhoff catheters. The novel implantation technique involves a low-site (7 cm above the midpoint of the pubic symphysis), individually tailored intra-abdominal segment, and increased vertical subcutaneous tunnel. Patients were followed for 1-year after procedure. The vertical tunnel-based low-site method implanted catheters were 3.7 ± 0.9 cm long, with an 11.3 ± 0.9 cm intra-abdominal segment. The incidence of postoperative bleeding, PD fluid leakage, outer cuff extrusion, inflow or outflow pain, peritonitis, tunnel inflammation, or exit-site infection did not differ significantly between the two surgical techniques; however, the incidence of catheter displacement and non-catheter displacement malfunctions after the novel technique (4.2%) was significantly lower than that in traditional open surgery (19.5%, P < 0.05). In conclusions, vertical tunnel-based low-site PD catheter implantation can significantly reduce the occurrence of PD catheter malfunction, particularly catheter displacement.

The placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus "Mini-Perc" technique

PURPOSE

Currently, most ESRD patients are treated with open surgical technique or with laparoscopic technique. In this study, we examined the role of the ureteroscope-assisted "Mini-Perc" technique versus the modified open surgery in the treatment of ESRD in a prospective randomized manner.

METHODS

A total of 72 patients with chronic renal failure were prospectively randomized for the ureteroscope-assisted "Mini-Perc" technique or modified open surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative morbidity, incision size, dose of local anesthesia, operative time, hospital stay, and initial catheter survival and follow-up were compared for both methods.

RESULTS

"Mini-Perc" group was associated with shorter incision size, operative time, and hospital stay, with lower dose of local anesthesia and incidence of bloody ascites. Two of five patients with the history of abdominal surgery in "Mini-Perc" group required adhesiolysis under direct vision of telescope. All adhesions were easily dissected. All complications of leakage (8.1 %) and incisional hernia (2.7 %) occurred in the open surgery group, but a difference of no significant value with "Mini-Perc" group (p = 0.2400, p = 1.0000). There was no any other significant difference in common complications between two groups. After 2 years of follow-up, 54 patients (75 %) survived with their initial PD catheter. The overall death was 5 (6.9 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to modified open surgical technique, the ureteroscope-assisted "Mini-Perc" technique can be used to achieve the same clinical efficacy for placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters in ESRD patients, and it carries minimal morbidity.

A modified open surgery technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement decreases catheter malfunction

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the effect of a new, modified open surgery technique on catheter-related malfunction.

METHODS

During the period from January 1997 to June 2009, 216 patients received initial peritoneal catheters. For the present study, patients were divided into four groups according to the catheter types and the surgery techniques: TO-S: traditional open surgery, straight Tenckhoff catheter TO-C: traditional open surgery, coiled Tenckhoff catheter TO-SN: traditional open surgery, swan-neck catheter MO-S: modified open surgery, straight Tenckhoff catheter The modified surgery was characterized by a low incision site, a short intra-abdominal catheter segment and an additional upward straight subcutaneous tunnel. All patients were followed up for 2 years or until death. Survival rates, complications caused by catheter placement, and the probability of malfunction-free catheter survival were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Catheter malfunction was the most frequent mechanical complication, found in 31 patients (14.4%), who experienced 38 malfunctions. Only 2 episodes of catheter malfunction were found in the MO-S group, representing a rate significantly less than those in the TO-S and TO-C groups (both p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier curves for malfunction-free PD catheter survival showed a significantly different malfunction-free probability for the various groups (p = 0.009). After 2 years of follow-up, 136 patients (63.0%) survived with their initial PD catheter. The initial catheter survival rate was 76.8% in the MO-S group. Kaplan-Meier curves for initial catheter survival showed that the highest survival rate was found in the MO-S group (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified open surgery technique is a reliable method for catheter placement.

Different outcomes of peritoneal catheter percutaneous placement by nephrologists using a trocar versus the Seldinger technique: the experience of two Brazilian centers

A good catheter implantation technique is important to allow effective peritoneal access function and long-term technique survival. Studies regarding results obtained by nephrologists in comparison with different techniques have been limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of early catheter-related complications and catheter survival in two Brazilian centers, according to two different percutaneous methods of catheter implantation performed by nephrologist team. Adult incident patients recruited from January 2006 to July 2013 having undergone first peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter implantation were included in the analysis. Mechanical and infectious early complication rates were defined as time to the first event occurring up to 3 months. Four hundred and forty-five consecutive Tenckhoff catheters were implanted by nephrologist team percutaneously after antibiotic prophylaxis in an operating room: trocar was used in 349 (78.4 %) and Seldinger technique (ST) in 99 (21.6 %). The ST was significantly associated with a lower rate of leak (16.3 vs 3 %, p = 0.03) and outflow failure due to tip catheter migration (22.6 vs 10.1 %, p = 0.04), while early infectious complication rates were similar between the two groups (p = 0.59). Long-term catheter survival was higher in Seldinger group (log-rank, p = 0.031). By Cox multivariate analysis, adjusted for age, sex, and diabetes, the ST remained independently associated with better catheter survival [HR 0.681 (0.462-0.910), p = 0.04]. As conclusion, our experience showed better PD outcomes with the ST than trocar method of catheter implantation by nephrologist.

Percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion by a nephrologist: a new, simple, and safe technique

BACKGROUND

Insertion of the peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter by a nephrologist has been encouraged by several studies. The ultimate goal is to provide safe, timely, and effective catheter insertion without an unduly long wait time or delay. The success of PD depends partly on the ease of catheter insertion. We developed a new technique for percutaneous PD catheter insertion by nephrologists. Our new technique, in addition to being easy, proved to be safe and to eliminate the need for the peel-away sheath.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively on all patients having a PD catheter inserted by a nephrologist using our new technique (40 catheters in 38 patients). All catheters were evaluated for infectious and mechanical complications.

RESULTS

The mean duration of the procedure from skin sterilization to the end of insertion was 24 ± 3 minutes. No bowel perforation or serious hemorrhage was recorded. Poor initial drainage was recorded in 12.5% of the catheters (n = 5) during the 4 weeks after insertion. The incidence of early exit-site leakage was 2.5% (1 catheter). Episodes of exit-site infection occurred in 5.0% and 12.5% of catheters (within 1 month and by the end of study period respectively). Two episodes of peritonitis were reported by the end of the 12-month period. Catheter survival was 95.0% and 87.5% at 6 months and 12 months respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous bedside placement of PD catheters using our new technique is safe and carries less morbidity in terms of bowel perforation, catheter-related infection, and exit-site leak. In addition, our new technique appears to have a high success rate and to offer considerable savings in terms of operating time.

A new simplified one-port laparoscopic technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement

BACKGROUND

Various techniques for laparoscopic insertion of a peritoneal dialysis catheter have been described. Usually 2 - 3 ports are required, and complications related to the port sites (such as abdominal wall hernia, leakage, and hemorrhage) cannot be avoided. To minimize the potential complications, we designed a simplified 1-port laparoscopic technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. ♢

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective data review of 44 patients who underwent 1-port laparoscopic insertion of a Tenckhoff catheter from June 2009 to February 2011. All patient data, including postoperative complications, were analyzed. ♢

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 11.52 months. All catheters were working properly, except in 1 patient who developed peritonitis 3 months after catheter placement. (The catheter was removed.) No postoperative abdominal wall hemorrhage, early leaks, hernias, or catheter migration occurred. No exit-site or tunnel infections were observed. ♢

CONCLUSIONS

Our 1-port laparoscopic technique provides excellent catheter fixation, avoids excessive port sites, and yields good cosmesis. The low complication rate and the simplicity of the method justify its standard use for Tenckhoff catheter placement.

The choice of peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation technique by nephrologists

Peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) is the lifeline of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. One of the critical issues for successful PD is a well-functioning PDC which is timely inserted. It is the implantation technique rather than the catheter design that determines the outcome of the catheter. Dedication in acquiring the appropriate technique is vital to the success of a PD program. In this paper, we discuss the pros and cons of various techniques used for PDC implantation. A detailed description of PDC implantation by using the minilaparotomy method is presented. We strongly recommend mini-laparotomy as the method of choice for PDC implantation by nephrologists.

Our long-term results of Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheters placement via laparoscopic preperitoneal tunneling technique

Previously we described the technique to lessen complications of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and to achieve immediate use of the catheter. In this study we evaluated our long-term results of the technique. A total of 61 procedures were carried out in 58 patients from September 2003 to February 2009. All patients were followed in our hospital CAPD clinic. Demographic, medical, operative, postoperative, and other information regarding complications and continued patient management was obtained retrospectively from the patients' medical records and entered into a computerized database. There were 33 men and 25 women. The mean age was 58 years. In 29 of the 58 patients indication of catheter placement was end stage renal failure combined with diabetes mellitus. Mean follow-up time was 33.31 ± 20.11 months. Catheter related complications were outflow obstruction (n=3, 5.2%) and peritonitis (n=2, 3.4%). Etiologies of catheter removal were out flow obstruction (n=2), recovery from renal disease (n=2), peritonitis (n=1), and pregnancy (n=1). The mean catheter survival time was found 5.57 ± 0.17 years. Our long-term results showed that the method ensured accurate placement, preperitoneal fixation, and immediate use of the catheter for routine peritoneal dialysis. Preperitoneal fixation of the catheter decreased outflow obstruction over long-term follow-up.

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: Is omentectomy necessary?

Context:

There are different methods of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) catheter placement. Open surgical technique is a widely followed method. The complication rate following catheter placement varies and catheter blockage due to omental plugging is one of the main reasons.

Aim:

To analyze the need for routine omentectomy during CAPD catheter placement.

Materials and Methods:

This was a retrospective analysis of 58 CAPD catheter placements performed between July 2002 and June 2007. Tenckhoff double cuffed catheter was used in all. The postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results:

There were 44 males and 14 females. The mean age was 51 years ranging from 15 to 76 years. Of these, 40 (69%) patients underwent omentectomy (group A) and 18 (31%) did not (group B). Laparoscopic and open techniques were performed in 5 and 53 patients, respectively. Omentectomy was not performed in 13 patients with open technique and all the five in the laparoscopic group. One patient in group A developed hemoperitoneum which was treated conservatively. None from group A developed catheter blockage, whereas five (27.8%) from group B developed catheter blockage postoperatively. The median time interval between the primary procedure and development of catheter blockage was 45 days (ranged from 14 to 150 days).

Conclusions:

Omentectomy during CAPD catheter placement prevents catheter blockage and secondary interventions.

Omental Folding: A Novel Laparoscopic Technique for Salvaging Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters

Background

Omental wrap is a common cause of catheter obstruction. Current laparoscopic techniques for correcting obstruction include omentopexy and omentectomy. This study evaluates the efficacy of a new laparoscopic technique for revision of obstructed peritoneal dialysis catheters.

Methods

Between November 2005 and November 2006, the technique was applied in 18 patients (6 female, 12 male; median age 50 years, range 16 – 73 years) on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis with catheter malfunction secondary to omental wrap. Pneumoperitoneum was induced under general anesthesia. Three ports were inserted. The catheter was released from the omentum and repositioned in the pelvis. The omentum was then folded onto itself in a cephalad direction using silk sutures. This shortened the omentum. The risk of catheter migration was minimized with a polypropylene sling passed through the abdominal wall and around the catheter, then knotted subcutaneously. The sling allowed catheter removal without a new laparoscopy. The outcomes were prospectively evaluated.

Results

Median operating time was 90 minutes (range 35 – 160 minutes). Adhesiolysis was performed in 4 patients: 1 patient had port-site leakage of dialysate, which settled with abdominal rest; 1 patient had bleeding during adhesiolysis and laparoscopic hemostasis was successful; 1 patient had recurrent catheter obstruction 2 weeks post-operatively and was converted to hemodialysis; and 1 patient had recurrent malfunction secondary to small bowel wrap after 5.5 months; re-salvage was successful. The success rate of the first salvage procedure was 89%(16/18). The catheters were still functioning after a mean follow-up of 16.5 ± 6.3 months (range 0.5 – 24 months). The 1-year catheter survival rate was 83.3%.

Conclusions

Omental folding is a safe and effective technique for salvaging peritoneal dialysis catheters.

Prospective randomized study for comparison of open surgery with laparoscopic-assisted placement of Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter--a single center experience and literature review

BACKGROUND

The ideal method for catheter placement in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis remains debatable. This prospective study intends to clarify whether laparoscopic assisted percutaneous puncture is superior to open surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2002 to 2006, 77 patients receiving first catheter placement were enrolled and randomized to either an open group of 40 patients or a laparoscopic group of 37 patients. Patient characteristics, operation-related data, procedural complications, and clinical outcome were compared by using the statistical software SPSS ver. 11.5 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

Laparoscopy had a longer operative time (68.32+/-31.90 versus 46.68+/-15.99 min; P<0.001), shorter wound length (1.69+/-0.46 versus 2.34+/-0.84 cm; P<0.001), and higher costs (P<0.001) compared with open surgery. Laparoscopy tended to have a higher incidence of pericannular bleeding (21.6% versus 7.5%) and a lower rate of early catheter migration (2.7% versus 15.0%), but its early/late/overall complication rate did not statistically differ. No surgical mortality occurred. Rate and cause of overall mortality or catheter dropout did not statistically differ. Catheter longevity was equivalent in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic assisted percutaneous puncture exhibited no superiority to open surgery. As a matter of fact, open surgery's shorter operative time and reduced equipment requirement can increase cost-effectiveness. Therefore, conventional open surgery is recommended for most patients with primary catheter placement.

Comparison of outcomes of peritoneal dialysis catheters placed by the fluoroscopically guided percutaneous method versus directly visualized surgical method

PURPOSE

To compare complications in catheters placed by the fluoroscopically guided percutaneous method versus directly visualized surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed. Mechanical complication rate data, including catheter leakage, malfunction, malposition, and bleeding, were compared between the two groups over a 1-year follow-up period. Additionally, exit site infection rates, tunnel infection rates, and peritonitis episodes were evaluated based on the incidence within 30 days of insertion and 30 days to 1 year after insertion.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients were analyzed (52 in the fluoroscopic guidance group, 49 in the direct visualization group). Prevalence of diabetes was similar: 56% in the directly visualized surgery group and 47% in the fluoroscopically guided treatment group (P = .37). Although the difference was not significant, complication rates tended to be higher in the directly visualized surgery group compared with the percutaneous placement group. These included catheter leakage (13% vs 4%; P = .093), malfunction (11% vs 9%; P = .73), malposition (13% vs 6%; P = .20), and bleeding (8% vs 2%; P = .21). There were no differences in early and late exit site infections and tunnel infections. Late peritonitis rates were lower in the percutaneous placement group (20%) than in the direct visualization group (42%) (P = .018). Diabetic patients had approximately six times greater risk of catheter malfunction than nondiabetic patients regardless of method of catheter insertion.

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters percutaneously with fluoroscopic guidance is as safe as placement with direct visualization techniques.

Laparoscopic-assisted peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: a microinvasive technique

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal dialysis is an alternate form of dialysis for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Although not as widely used as hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis (PD) has clear advantages, especially those related to patient satisfaction and simplicity. The purpose of our study was to describe and look at the results of a microinvasive technique for placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters under laparoscopy.

METHODS

From August 2003 to January 2006, 12 patients with ESRD underwent laparoscopic-assisted peritoneal dialysis (LAPD) catheter placement with the microinvasive technique at our institution. Data collected included age, gender, underlying renal disease, and length of operation. Followup was completed for all patients (at least 6 months) and catheter-related morbidity and mortality were also analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 13 procedures performed (one patient had LAPD catheter placement twice). The average age was 45 years and the most common cause of ESRD was uncontrolled arterial hypertension. Procedural time averaged 33.6 min (range = 24-50 min). Peritoneal dialysis was introduced two weeks after the procedure and no dialysate leaks were observed. There were two catheter-related morbidities; both were catheter exit-site abscesses, one managed surgically with removal of the PD catheter and the other managed conservatively with culture-sensitive antimicrobials. Patient satisfaction was beyond acceptable in 92% of the patients (12 of 13). Average longevity of the catheter was 61 weeks (427 days). There were no mortalities.

CONCLUSION

LAPD catheter placement is an easy technique with acceptable catheter longevity and minimal morbidity. The microinvasive technique leads to better patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome without affecting its function. Therefore, we believe that by promoting microinvasive LAPD catheter placement, PD will gain more acceptance among doctors and patients.

Clinical practice guidelines for pediatric peritoneal dialysis

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) continues to be an important modality of treatment for children with end-stage renal disease. The Canadian Association of Pediatric Nephrologists recognized the need nationally to review the literature on the delivery of PD in children to provide optimal standardized care. This resulted in the development of the Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines for pediatric PD. Clinical practice guidelines are a useful adjunct to clinical care. The present review includes recommendations for catheter placement and types, requirement for prophylactic omentectomy, initiation and adequacy of dialysis, PD prescription, and solute clearance. It provides physicians with updated evidence-based recommendations that include consideration towards practicality with the major goal of improved and standardized patient care.

Mini-laparoscopic placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter

BACKGROUND

The laparoscopic placement of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) catheters is now an accepted technique. We evaluated a new technique for CAPD catheter placement that requires only a single 2-mm port.

METHODS

A pilot study was conducted at an academic minimally invasive surgery center. Seven consecutive patients in whom a CAPD catheter was required underwent placement of a 2-mm Veress port and a laparoscope. A carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum was induced up to 14 mmHg. Under direct visualization with a 2-mm scope, a CAPD catheter was advanced over the right lower quadrant toward the pelvis using a modified Seldinger technique.

RESULTS

Seven patients (four women and three men) with end-stage renal disease underwent mini-laparoscopic placement of a CAPD catheter. Mean patient age was 35.3 +/- 11.3 years (range, 17-50). Mean operative time was 20.7 +/- 5.0 min (range, 14-29). Patients were dialyzed in the immediate postoperative period. No leaks were identified, and there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

A mini-laparoscopic technique using a single 2-mm port and a modified Seldinger technique is feasible, safe, and effective for peritoneal dialysis catheter placements.

Laparoscopic omentectomy for salvage of peritoneal dialysis catheters

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Maintaining long-term peritoneal catheter function for peritoneal dialysis is commonly threatened by problems with catheter obstruction. Multiple methods have been used to salvage nonfunctioning catheters, including omentopexy, catheter repositioning, and omentectomy. We report on our experience with a laparoscopic method of omentectomy and catheter fixation for salvage of nonfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirteen patients with nonfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters underwent 16 laparoscopic procedures with the intent to restore function. Clinically, all patients presented with outflow obstruction. At initial presentation, all patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy and a definitive procedure. In 12 patients, catheters were enveloped by omentum, and we performed laparoscopic omentectomy and catheter fixation to the anterior pelvic wall. In one patient, we identified a broken catheter and performed a laparoscopic omentectomy at the time of catheter replacement. One 10-mm and two 5-mm trocars were utilized. Omentectomy was performed using either endo-GIA stapled resection (2 patients) or the Harmonic Scalpel (11 patients). All trocar incisions (including the 5-mm site) were closed with a suture-passing (Carter-Thomason) device to provide water-tight closure in anticipation of immediate return to peritoneal dialysis. Patients were followed postoperatively for an average of 17 months (range 4-35 months).

RESULTS

All patients' catheter function was restored intraoperatively with laparoscopic omentectomy and catheter fixation. Eight catheters remained functioning following omentectomy without further intervention. Five patients (38%) experienced repeat catheter malfunction and underwent laparoscopic exploration. Of these, three catheters (60%) were restored to function with laparoscopic manipulation alone. Three catheters were found encased in extensive adhesions. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis was successful in one patient and unsuccessful in one patient, who converted to hemodialysis. One patient failed laparoscopic salvage and required open laparotomy and fibrin clot removal to restore catheter function. One catheter was found to be obstructed within a pericolic hematoma. One catheter was found within residual omentum at the hepatic flexure. Both of these catheters were freed laparoscopically and continued to function at 12 and 16 months' follow-up. Complications included one episode of peritonitis, one case of postoperative ileus, and one trocar site hernia necessitating repair. The nephrologists were instructed that they could begin peritoneal dialysis on postoperative day 1. Seven patients resumed peritoneal dialysis without leak from trocar sites. The remaining patients received temporary hemodialysis through a central venous catheter and returned to peritoneal dialysis at the discretion of their nephrologists.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic omentectomy with catheter fixation is a minimally invasive means of salvaging peritoneal dialysis catheters with outflow obstruction. Complications are few, and closure of laparoscopic incisions in water-tight fashion allows rapid return to peritoneal dialysis.

Technical survival of CAPD catheters: comparison between percutaneous and conventional surgical placement techniques

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) placement is a well-tolerated, rapidly performed bedside procedure that allows a rapid initiation of CAPD. We compared the technical survival of PDCs while comparing the mode of insertion.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 215 PDCs inserted over a 60-month period in 191 patients on CAPD therapy. Of these, 133 were placed percutaneously by nephrology staff (group P) and 82 were placed using conventional surgical techniques by surgical staff (group S). The total experience accumulated was 4000 patient-months: 2260 patient-months in group P and 1740 patient-months in group S.

RESULTS

The incidence of complications in PDCs did not differ between the groups (1 episode/33 patient-months in group P and 1 episode/29 patient-months in group S). Two episodes of early leakage and 9 episodes of late leakage were observed in group P compared with one early leakage and 4 episodes of late leakage in group S. Of the mechanical complications in group P, 8.86% were due to catheter malfunction, including catheter tip migration and obstruction, compared with 12.63% in group S. The incidence of catheter infections was 1 episode/73 patient-months in group P and 1 episode/62 patient-months in group S. Significantly more catheters were removed in group S compared with group P (40% vs 16%, P<0.001). One-year and 2-year technical survivals were 90% and 82% in group P, and 73% and 60% in group S (P=0.0032), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous bedside placement of PDCs by nephrologists provides a safe and reliable access for peritoneal dialysis.

Laparoscopic Tenckhoff catheter insertion: a prospective study of a new technique

BACKGROUND

This study describes a new technique of laparoscopic Tenckhoff catheter insertion.

METHODS

During a 12-month period, 53 consecutive patients requiring insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters were studied prospectively. A new technique of laparoscopic insertion was developed.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients out of 49 (98%) had successful insertion. Four patients were excluded with active peritonitis. There was an early complication rate of 8% (4/49) and a late complication rate of 14% (7/49). There was 12% overall failure of catheter with a mean follow up of 6 (1-13) months.

CONCLUSION

This new laparoscopic technique maximizes the advantages of laparoscopic surgery and has complication rates which compare favourably with other open and laparoscopic techniques.

Peritoneoscopic versus surgical placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a prospective randomized study on outcome

The most commonly used technique for insertion of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters is open surgical approach by minilaparotomy. Percutaneous implantation via the peritoneoscopic technique is expanding. Studies have suggested that PD catheters placed peritoneoscopically have longer survival rate than surgically placed ones. However, these studies were not randomized, where the surgical group had more patients who were obese or had prior abdominal surgery, and therefore, the selection of patients may have biased the results. We conducted a prospective randomized study in which patients underwent PD catheter placement by either the surgical or the peritoneoscopic technique. In the period from October 1992 through October 1995, 148 double-cuff, curled-end, swan-neck PD catheters were placed in 148 patients. The outcome of the 76 patients in whom the PD catheters were placed peritoneoscopically was compared with that of the 72 patients in whom the catheters were placed surgically. Early peritonitis episodes (within 2 weeks of catheter placement) occurred in 9 of 72 patients (12.5%) in the surgical group, versus 2 of 76 patients (2.6%) in the peritoneoscopy group (P = 0.02). This higher rate of infection was most likely related to a higher exit site leak in the surgical group (11.1%) as compared with the peritoneoscopy group (1.3%). Moreover, peritoneoscopically placed catheters were found to have better survival (77.5% at 12 months, 63% at 24 months, and 51.3% at 36 months) than those placed surgically (62.5% at 12 months, 41.5% at 24 months, and 36% at 36 months) with P = 0.02, 0.01, and 0.04, respectively. We conclude that peritoneoscopically placed PD catheters have a longer survival rate than surgically placed ones. Furthermore, the rate of exit site leak and early infection is lower in the peritoneoscopic method.

Surgical experience with implantable insulin pumps. Department of Veterans Affairs Implantable Insulin Pump Study Group

BACKGROUND

A recent Veterans Affairs cooperative trial demonstrated that intensive insulin therapy via an implantable pump with intraperitoneal insulin delivery reduced glycemic variability and improved quality of life compared with multiple daily insulin injections. Our aim was to determine perioperative morbidity and assess long-term function of the implantable insulin pump.

METHODS

Fifty-one adult patients with type 2 diabetes had infusion pumps placed over a 2-year period at seven VA Medical Centers as part of a randomized prospective study.

RESULTS

All pumps were placed successfully. There were two (4%) perioperative complications. There were no wound complications. Duration of pump use ranged from 12 to 25 months (mean 20). Catheter obstruction (57%) and pump malfunction (25%) were the most common reasons for pump explantation. Catheter occlusions increased after 12 months. Catheter occlusion was treated by percutaneous rinse procedure in 75% and revisional procedures in 31% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Implantable insulin pumps can be placed with minimal surgical morbidity. Attention to surgical detail and infusion protocol permits satisfactory long-term function. Pump/catheter complications increase with time but are usually resolvable by either operative or percutaneous manipulations.

Entrapment of the appendix and the fallopian tube in peritoneal dialysis catheters in two children

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) has revolutionized the management of renal failure in children. However, CAPD catheter malfunction is not uncommon, the main complications being catheter-related infection and catheter-related obstruction. Herein the authors report both of the above complications, attributable to unique and previously unreported causes. One patient had appendicitis and peritonitis secondary to catheter entrapment of the appendix; the other had an obstructed catheter secondary to entrapment of the right fallopian tube within its lumen. To avoid potentially serious complications, early exploration of malfunctioning catheters is recommended.

Inguinal herniorrhaphy in the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patient

Inguinal hernia repair in the patient on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is complicated in theory by an increased potential for recurrence. In addition to the constant increased intraabdominal pressure, chronic renal failure has been shown to impair tissue healing. Controversy exists regarding the waiting period before resuming CAPD postoperatively. A retrospective review of all CAPD patients undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy was performed. The patient's age, type of repair, duration of renal failure preoperatively, length of time on CAPD postoperatively, and date of resumption of CAPD were recorded. An inpatient and outpatient chart review was performed on all patients. Telephone follow-up was performed on surviving patients. From April 1981 to June 1989, 30 patients underwent 36 inguinal herniorrhaphies while on CAPD. One immediate postoperative death occurred due to underlying cardiac disease. The mean follow-up for surviving patients was 34 months (range, 16 to 91) and for those deceased was 25 months (range, 1 to 60). No recurrent hernias were identified either by extensive inpatient and outpatient chart review, or by direct patient telephone contact in all surviving patients. We conclude that inguinal herniorrhaphy can be safely performed in CAPD patients. Peritoneal dialysis can be initiated immediately after repair in this high-risk group of patients. There is a low risk of recurrence; however, long-term patient survival is not expected due to concurrent underlying medical problems.