Clinical utilization and complications of sural nerve biopsy

PREVENTION OF SYMPTOMATIC NEUROMA BY USING SYNTHETIC CONDUITS IN FINGER AMPUTATION STUMPS

Objective

Compare the formation of symptomatic neuromas in patients submitted to digital amputations, with and without nerve conduits (Neurolac® ), and sensitivity return.

Methods

Prospective, case-control study, including 14 patients with digital amputations (total of 17 fingers) whose conduits were used on the ulnar or radial side, while the contralateral side was used in the same patients as control. The Tinel test, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament, and two-point discrimination tests were evaluated at one week, two weeks, one month, three months, and six months postoperatively.

Results

Using nerve conduits (Neurolac®) in digital nerve amputation stumps had statistical significance (p = 0.04) in preventing pain due to symptomatic neuroma at the end of six months after digital regularization.

Conclusion

There is a favorable trend towards using conduits as prophylaxis of symptomatic neuroma formation since the nerves in which they were used showed fewer clinical signs of neuroma formation six months after surgery. Level of evidence II, Prospective comparative study.

Monoclonal Gammopathy-Associated Neuropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is more commonly seen in individuals with monoclonal gammopathies, especially in patients with an IgM monoclonal gammopathy or Waldenström macroglobulinemia.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are multiple potential ways that the paraprotein may result in peripheral neuropathy. The diagnosis and management of monoclonal gammopathy-associated PN are challenging and necessitate a concerted effort between the hematologist/oncologist and the neurologist. This review describes the most common PN syndromes associated with monoclonal gammopathy, such as anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein neuropathy, light chain amyloidosis, cryoglobulinemia, POEMS, CANOMAD, and others. We also review the therapies used to treat these conditions.

Neurosurgical Intervention for Nerve and Muscle Biopsies

(1) Background: Neurologic and musculoskeletal diseases represent a considerable portion of the underlying etiologies responsible for the widely prevalent symptoms of pain, weakness, numbness, and paresthesia. Because of the subjective and often nonspecific nature of these symptoms, different diagnostic modalities have been explored and utilized. (2) Methods: Literature review. (3) Results: Nerve and muscle biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing many of the responsible neurological and musculoskeletal conditions. However, the need for invasive tissue sampling is diminishing as more investigations explore alternative diagnostic modalities. Because of this, it is important to explore the current role of neurosurgical intervention for nerve and muscle biopsies and its current relevance in the diagnostic landscape of neurological and musculoskeletal disorders. With consideration of the role of nerve and muscle biopsy, it is also important to explore innovations and emerging techniques for conducting these procedures. This review explores the indications and emerging techniques for neurological intervention for nerve and muscle biopsies. (4) Conclusions: The role of neurosurgical intervention for nerve and muscle biopsy remains relevant in diagnosing many neurological and musculoskeletal disorders. Biopsy is especially relevant as a supportive point of evidence for diagnosis in atypical cases. Additionally, emerging techniques have been explored to guide diagnostics and biopsy, conduct less invasive biopsies, and reduce risks of worsening neurologic function and other symptoms secondary to biopsy.

Diagnostic yield of nerve biopsy in the evaluation of peripheral neuropathies

BACKGROUND

With progress made in neurogenetics and neuroinflammation, the indications and value of nerve biopsies in the diagnostic evaluation of peripheral neuropathies are less clear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of nerve biopsies in patients with peripheral neuropathies.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of nerve biopsy reports from April 1998 to June 2021 of patients with peripheral neuropathies presenting to the Department of Pathology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The diagnostic value of the biopsies was determined based on the criteria by Midroni and Bilbao as follows: contributive (essential and helpful), non-contributive and inadequate.

RESULTS

A total of 107 nerve biopsies were analysed. Sixty-four (60 %) were males and the mean age was 52 years, ranging from 13 to 86 years. Ninety-four (88 %) were sural nerve biopsies; and only one patient (1 %) each had superficial peroneal and superficial radial nerve biopsy. The indications for the procedure were vasculitis (34 %), peripheral neuropathy of unknown aetiology (34 %), amyloidosis (14 %) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (10 %). In 68 (63 %) biopsies, the diagnostic value was contributive. Of these, 28 (26 %) were essential and 40 (37 %) were helpful. In contrast, 35 (33 %) biopsies were non-contributive and 4 (4 %) were inadequate. In 66 % (71/107) of cases, the nerve biopsy did not reveal a definite pathological diagnosis. However, in the remainder, a diagnosis of vasculitis (18 %, 19/107), followed by amyloidosis (10 %, 11/107) could be determined. For 32/71 biopsies with undetermined pathological diagnosis, neuropathy remained cryptogenic in 22 % (7/32) upon follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of vasculitis and amyloidosis, there is limited value in performing nerve biopsies in the evaluation of patients with peripheral neuropathy. However, this should be interpreted with caution as the number of patients with a clinical diagnosis of vasculitis and amyloidosis were relatively larger than patients with other diagnosis. Refinement and careful selection of cases are required to increase the diagnostic yield of nerve biopsy.

The role of sural nerve biopsy in diagnosis of vasculitis

OBJECTIVE

The diagnostic yield of sural nerve biopsy (SNB) in vasculitis is uncertain. Our aim was to document relevant characteristics of patients undergoing sural nerve biopsy in the investigation of vasculitis; determine the diagnostic yield; relate positive biopsy findings to patient demographic, laboratory, and clinical parameters; and to calculate the rate of surgical complications.

METHODS

Patients with suspected vasculitis that underwent SNB as part of diagnostic evaluation at academic medical centres in Sweden and the United Kingdom were identified by searching local pathology databases and clinic registers. A structured review of medical case records and pathology reports was conducted. Histological findings were categorized as definite, probable, or no vasculitis in accordance with the 2015 Brighton Collaboration reinterpretation and update of the Peripheral Nerve Society Guidelines for Vasculitic Neuropathy. Definite and probable findings were considered positive for vasculitis.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients that underwent SNB were identified (45% female). Forty (44%) showed histological evidence of vasculitis: 14 definite and 26 probable. A concomitant muscle biopsy conducted in 10 patients did not contribute to the diagnostic yield. Positive antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody test, organ involvement other than the nervous system, and a longer biopsy sample were associated with a positive biopsy. The reported surgical complication rate was 15%.

CONCLUSION

Sural nerve biopsy of sufficient length is an expedient procedure to confirm a diagnosis of vasculitis.

Nerve biopsy: Current indications and decision tools

After initial investigation of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of neuropathy, a clinical decision is made for a minority of patients to undergo further assessment with nerve biopsy. Many nerve biopsies do not demonstrate a definitive pathological diagnosis and there is considerable cost and morbidity associated with the procedure. This highlights the need for appropriate selection of patients, nerves and neuropathology techniques. Additionally, concomitant muscle and skin biopsies may improve the diagnostic yield in some cases. Several advances have been made in diagnostics in recent years, particularly in genomics. The indications for nerve biopsy have consequently changed over time. This review explores the current indications for nerve biopsies and some of the issues surrounding its use. Also included are comments on alternative diagnostic modalities that may help to supplant or reduce the use of nerve biopsy as a diagnostic test. These primarily include extraneural biopsy and neuroimaging techniques such as magnetic resonance neurography and nerve ultrasound. Finally, we propose an algorithm to assist in deciding when to perform nerve biopsies.

Intraneural fibrosis and loss of microvascular architecture - Key findings investigating failed human nerve allografts

BACKGROUND

Processed nerve allografts are increasingly used in clinical nerve reconstruction with promising results. However, allograft failure has been reported, leading to chronic pain and persistent loss of function. In the present work, we performed a histological and immunohistochemical analysis of two failed allograft reconstructions of a sensory human nerve one year after primary surgery.

METHODS

Two patients with a superficial radial nerve injury underwent nerve reconstruction with processed nerve allografts. The clinical follow-up was complicated by severe neuropathic pain and absent sensory reinnervation. Consequently, the failed allografts were excised with subsequent histological and immunohistochemical examinations. For that purpose, the collagen content and neurofilament network as well as the blood and lymphatic vasculature were analysed in the center of the specimens.

RESULTS

Histology revealed increased fibrosis, fatty degeneration, and disorganised proliferation of nerve fibres. Moreover, the microvascular network within the allografts was characterised by increased numbers of microvessels, whereas no difference was found concerning the lymphatic vasculature.

CONCLUSION

The herein presented histological and immunohistochemical findings indicate that the failure of human allografts is associated with loss of the physiological microvascular architecture. Future studies elucidating the complex interplay of angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis and axonal regeneration are required to better understand the mechanisms of human allograft failure.

Evaluation of the Use of Nerve Allograft Preserved in Glycerol

Background:

We aimed to evaluate the use of nerve allograft preserved in glycerol. We compared the efficiency of glycerol-preserved allografts with autogenous nerve grafting, cryopreserved grafts, and detergent-processed grafts in the axonal regeneration. Secondarily, we evaluated the effectiveness of each preservation method in maintaining the extracellular matrix free of cellular components.

Methods:

This was a prospective experimental, longitudinal, unblinded, nonrandomized, controlled animal model study. Three different allograft preservation techniques for the repair of sciatic nerve injuries were compared, including cold preservation, glycerol preservation, and detergent preservation. Functional assessment was performed, and histomorphometric analyses were further performed, which enabled the allograft structure evaluation and an estimation of the nerve regeneration efficacy based on the myelinated axons count and on their diameters.

Results:

After the 14^th week, all groups were already balanced and similar (P = 0.265): all groups present near-zero SFIs, thus confirming their efficiency in promoting nerve regeneration. In the histomorphometric evaluations, all groups were equivalent, presenting a similar efficiency in nerve regeneration (P = 0.716 and P = 0.577, respectively). Similarly, histomorphometric evaluations showed a reduction in the number of axons and in their diameters, but none of them effectively eliminated all cellular debris. Comparing the groups with each other, the groups preserved in glycerol and detergent solution were similar, both presenting better results than the cooled group.

Conclusion:

By evaluating the presence of cell debris after the treatment using glycerol, it was found to be similar to the treatment using detergent and significantly better than the cold-preservation treatment.

Chronic postoperative complications and donor site morbidity after sural nerve autograft harvest or biopsy

Background

The sural nerve is the most frequently harvested nerve autograft and is most often biopsied in the workup of peripheral neuropathy. While the complication types associated with these two procedures are well known, their clinical significance is poorly understood and there is a paucity of data regarding the complication rates.

Methods

Pubmed search identified studies regarding complications after sural nerve harvest and biopsy. The data was grouped into sensory deficits, chronic pain, sensory symptoms, wound infections, wound complications, other postoperative complications, and complications impacting daily life. The incidence of each complication was calculated, and a chi‐square analysis was performed to determine if there were any differences between nerve biopsies and graft harvest with respect to each complication.

Results

Twelve studies yielded 478 sural nerve procedures. Sensory deficits occurred at a rate of 92.9%, chronic pain at 19.7%, sensory symptoms at 41.1%, wound infections at 5.7%, noninfectious wound complications at 7.8%, and impact on daily life at 5.0%. The differences in wound infections, sensory symptoms, and impact on daily life between biopsies versus graft excisions were found to reach statistical significance (p < .05).

Conclusions

Sural nerve excisions can cause chronic postoperative donor‐site complications. Given these complications, alternative available mediums for nerve reconstruction should be explored and utilized wherever appropriate. If an alternative medium is unavailable and nerve autograft must be harvested for nerve reconstruction, then patients should be counseled about risks for developing donor site complications that may negatively affect quality of life.

Peripheral nerve repair throughout the body with processed nerve allografts: Results from a large multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve damage resulting in pain, loss of sensation, or motor function may necessitate a reconstruction with a bridging material. The RANGER® Registry was designed to evaluate outcomes following nerve repair with processed nerve allograft (Avance® Nerve Graft; Axogen; Alachua, FL). Here we report on the results from the largest peripheral nerve registry to-date.

METHODS

This multicenter IRB-approved registry study collected data from patients repaired with processed nerve allograft (PNA). Sites followed their own standard of care for patient treatment and follow-up. Data were assessed for meaningful recovery, defined as ≥S3/M3 to remain consistent with previously published results, and comparisons were made to reference literature.

RESULTS

The study included 385 subjects and 624 nerve repairs. Overall, 82% meaningful recovery (MR) was achieved across sensory, mixed, and motor nerve repairs up to gaps of 70 mm. No related adverse events were reported. There were no significant differences in MR across the nerve type, age, time-to-repair, and smoking status subgroups in the upper extremity (p > .05). Significant differences were noted by the mechanism of injury subgroups between complex injures (74%) as compared to lacerations (85%) or neuroma resections (94%) (p = .03) and by gap length between the <15 mm and 50-70 mm gap subgroups, 91 and 69% MR, respectively (p = .01). Results were comparable to historical literature for nerve autograft and exceed that of conduit.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide clinical evidence to support the continued use of PNA up to 70 mm in sensory, mixed and motor nerve repair throughout the body and across a broad patient population.

Diagnostic Value of Sural Nerve Biopsy: Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Cases From 1981 to 2017

Nerve biopsy represents the conclusive step in the diagnostic work-up of peripheral neuropathies, and its diagnostic yield is still debated. The aim of this study is to consider the impact of nerve biopsy on reaching a useful diagnosis in different peripheral neuropathies and its changing over time. We retrospectively analyzed 1,179 sural nerve biopsies performed in the period 1981–2017 at Neurological Clinic of Policlinico San Martino (Genoa). We relied on medical records and collected both clinical and pathological data in a database. Biopsy provided univocal diagnoses in 53% of cases (with an increase over time), multiple diagnostic options in 14%, while diagnosis was undetermined in 33% (undetermined reports decreased during the years). In 57% of patients, the pre-biopsy suspicion was confirmed, while in 43% sural biopsy modified the clinical diagnosis. The highest yield was in axonal neuropathies (29% undetermined reports vs. 40% in demyelinating and 48% in mixed neuropathies). In 68% of patients with vasculitic neuropathy, this etiology was already suspected, whereas in 32% nerve biopsy modified the clinical diagnosis. During the years, the number of annually performed biopsies decreased significantly (p = 0.007), with an increase in the mean age of patients (p < 0.0001). The percentage of hereditary neuropathies had a significant decrease (p = 0.016), while the rate of vasculitic and chronic inflammatory neuropathies increased (p < 0.0001). This is the largest Italian study addressing the yield of sural nerve biopsy. During the years, we observed a progressive refinement of the indication of this procedure, which confirms its utility for interstitial neuropathies, particularly if non-systemic vasculitic neuropathy is suspected.

Technically successful ultrasound-guided percutaneous sural nerve needle biopsy in a patient with indeterminate peripheral neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether ultrasound-guided percutaneous sural nerve needle biopsy yields sufficient tissue for analysis in a patient with suspected vasculitis-related peripheral neuropathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With real-time ultrasound guidance, a hydrodissection of the sural nerve from the adjacent small saphenous vein was first performed. A 14-gauge biopsy needle was then manipulated under real-time ultrasound guidance to obtain two transverse samples of the sural nerve at the lateral distal calf.

RESULTS

The biopsy was technically successful and yielded adequate tissue for routine processing. The specimen showed mild epineurial perivascular chronic inflammation with marked loss of myelinated axons. These histologic findings are not diagnostically definitive for vasculitis-related peripheral neuropathy but were supportive of the diagnosis in combination with the patient's physical examination, laboratory, and electromyography findings. The patient suffered no immediate complications after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

This ultrasound-guided sural nerve needle biopsy, like many surgical biopsies, did not yield a definitive result in a patient with suspected vasculitis-related peripheral neuropathy; however, the procedure was technically successful. Given that percutaneous needle procedures offer many advantages over surgical procedures, we believe that this procedure warrants further investigation.

Negative Pressure Therapy in the Regeneration of the Sciatic Nerve Using Vacuum - Assisted Closure in a Rabbit Model

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of negative pressure therapy in the regeneration of the rabbit sciatic nerve using vacuum assisted closure (VAC).

Material/Methods

Thirty male New Zealand white rabbits underwent surgical injury of the sciatic nerve, followed by negative pressure therapy using vacuum assisted closure (VAC), in three treatment groups: Group A: 0 kPa; Group B: −20 kPa; Group C: −40 kPa. At 12 weeks following surgery, the following factors were studied: motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV); the number of myelinated nerve fibers; the wet weight of the gastrocnemius muscle. Gastrocnemius muscle and sciatic nerve tissue samples were studied for the expression of S100, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) using Western blot.

Results

At 12 weeks following VAC treatment, the MNCV, number of myelinated nerve fibers, and wet weight of the gastrocnemius muscle showed significant differences between the groups (p<0.05), in the following order: Group B >Group A >Group C. The sciatic nerve at 12 weeks following VAC in Group B and Group C showed a significant increase in expression of S100 and BDNF when compared with Group A; no significant differences were detected between Group B and Group C results from Western blot at 12 weeks.

Conclusions

The findings of this study, using negative pressure therapy in VAC in a rabbit model of sciatic nerve damage, have shown that moderate negative pressure was beneficial, but high values did not benefit sciatic nerve repair.

Pediatric Nerve Biopsy Diagnostic and Treatment Utility in Tertiary Care Referral

BACKGROUND

Pediatric neuropathies are both unique and similar to their adult counterparts, with genetic varieties thought to be more common. The objective of this work was to assess the utility of nerve biopsy in children at a tertiary referral center in light of availability of current genetic testing.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, nerve biopsy, and genetic testing findings of 316 pediatric (age ≤18 years) patients.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 9.8 years (4 days to 18 years). Nerve biopsy was nontargeted in 198 (182 whole sural, seven superficial peroneal, and nine other), targeted in 21 (14 fascicular sciatic and seven brachial plexus), and unknown in 97 cases. Prebiopsy localizations and diagnoses were diverse, most commonly with length-dependent localizations (n = 150). Median follow-up was 6 months (0 to 480 months). A distinctive histopathologic diagnosis was made in 106 cases (33%), including inflammatory or immune (n = 30), neoplastic (n = 19), hereditary (n = 41), vasculitis (n = 10), and other (n = 6). Nerve biopsy confirmed the suspected diagnosis in 91 (29%) individuals and changed or refined the initial diagnosis in 182 (58%). Treatment modifications as a result of biopsy occurred in 80 (25%) cases; 59 (19% of the entire cohort) with clinical improvements noted, most commonly by immunotherapy (n = 30). Low diagnostic yield occurred in "hypotonic infants" without nerve conduction abnormalities. Pain at the biopsy site beyond 1 month was rare (n = 3; 1%). Forty-four patients underwent genetic testing. Among demyelinating varieties, mutations were identified in five of 11 (46%) cases compared with only six of 33 (18%) cases of axonal varieties.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric nerve biopsy provides diagnostic information that frequently alters treatment recommendations. Furthermore, it leads to clinical improvements, especially in inflammatory immune neuropathies. For suspected inherited varieties, genetic testing has the highest diagnostic yield in demyelinating phenotypes.

High-Resolution Ultrasonography of the Superficial Peroneal Motor and Sural Sensory Nerves May Be a Non-invasive Approach to the Diagnosis of Vasculitic Neuropathy

High-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) is an emerging new tool in the investigation of peripheral nerves. We set out to assess the utility of HRUS performed at lower extremity nerves in peripheral neuropathies. Nerves of 26 patients with polyneuropathies of different etiologies and 26 controls were investigated using HRUS. Patients underwent clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological assessment, and a diagnostic sural nerve biopsy as part of the routine work-up. HRUS was performed at the sural, tibial, and the common, superficial, and deep peroneal nerves. The superficial peroneal nerve longitudinal diameter (LD) distinguished best between the groups: patients with immune-mediated neuropathies (n = 13, including six with histology-proven vasculitic neuropathy) had larger LD compared to patients with non-immune-mediated neuropathies (p < 0.05) and to controls (p < 0.001). Among all subgroups, patients with vasculitic neuropathy showed the largest superficial peroneal nerve LD (p < 0.001) and had a larger sural nerve cross-sectional area when compared with disease controls (p < 0.001). Enlargement of the superficial peroneal and sural nerves as detected by HRUS may be a useful additional finding in the differential diagnosis of vasculitic and other immune-mediated neuropathies.

Minced nerve tissue in vein grafts used as conduits in rat tibial nerves

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral nerve injuries are encountered frequently in clinical practice. In nerve repair, an end-to-end suture is the preferable choice of treatment. However, where primary closure is not possible, the defect is to be repaired with a nerve graft.

METHODS

A total of 21 female Wistar rats weighing 230 to 290 g were used in the study. They were classified into the following 3 groups: (I) nerve graft, (II) vein graft, and (III) minced nerve graft. In group I, after exposure of the tibial nerve, a 1-cm-long nerve gap was created on the tibial nerve, and the defect was repaired epineurally by using the autogenous nerve. In group II, the 1-cm tibial nerve defect was repaired by using an autogenous vein graft. In group III, a 1-cm nerve graft was divided to 3 equal parts, with one of the nerve parts being minced with microscissors and placed in the vein graft lumen. Thereafter, a 1-cm tibial nerve defect was repaired by the vein graft filled with minced nerve tissue. The tibial function indices (TFIs) were calculated for functional assessment using the Bain-Mackinnon-Hunter formula. Light and electron microscopic evaluations were performed for morphometric assessment. In addition, the myelinated fibers were counted in all groups.

RESULTS

The TFIs of group II were found to be the lowest among all the groups after the sixth week, whereas the TFI of group I was found to be better than the other groups after the sixth week. There was no difference in TFIs between group I and group III. On the basis of the number of myelinated fibers, there was no statistically significant difference between group I and group III, whereas the difference was significant (P<0.05) between groups I/III and group II. Presence of peripheral nerves in light microscopic evaluation revealed normal characteristics of myelinated fibers in all groups. The myelinated axon profile was near normal in the nerve graft group in electron microscopic evaluation. However, there were more degenerated axons with disturbed contours and vacuolizations in the vein graft group compared to the minced nerve graft group.

CONCLUSIONS

We can conclude that using minced nerve tissue in vein grafts as a conduit increases the regeneration of nerves (almost like the nerve graft group) and it may not be caused by donor-site morbidity. It can be used in the repair of nerve defects instead of autogenous nerve grafts after further experimental evidence and clinical trials.

Neuropathy in elderly: lessons learnt from nerve biopsy

OBJECTIVE

To study the utility of nerve biopsy in providing diagnostic, therapeutic or prognostic information that aid in clinical management in elderly subjects with peripheral neuropathy.

METHODS

Clinico-pathological data of 100 elderly subjects aged 65 and above with peripheral neuropathy who underwent nerve biopsy in the last decade (2002-2011) was reviewed.

RESULTS

The study included 100 subjects (M:F 78:22). Mean age at biopsy and symptom duration was 69.62±4.8 years and 24.17±40.4 months, respectively. The most common pattern of was distal symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy (35%), followed by multiple mononeuropathy (29%) and asymmetric sensorimotor neuropathy (15%). The nerve biopsy was 'diagnostic' in 24%, (definite vasculitis in 12, leprosy in 10 and acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in 2) and proved 'essential' or 'helpful' in therapeutic management in 81% subjects. In 60 (60%) patients, where a pre-biopsy aetiological diagnosis could be arrived at based on the available data, nerve biopsy confirmed the diagnosis in 29 of 60 (48.3%), and offered a new diagnosis in 25 (41.7%). A higher yield of biopsy was noted in subjects with asymmetric/multiple mononeuropathy compared with symmetric neuropathies (32.7% versus 17.7%). In 40 (40%) patients without a pre-biopsy aetiological diagnosis, nerve biopsy was 'essential' in 7 of 40 (17.5%) as it provided a definitive diagnosis (definite vasculitis: 5, leprosy: 2), and 'helpful' in 21 of 40 (52.5%) (ischaemic neuropathy: 10, possible vasculitis: 9, probable vasculitis: 2).

CONCLUSION

Nerve biopsy aided in the detection of potentially treatable disorders and influenced patient management in a significant proportion of elderly subjects with peripheral neuropathy (81%), particularly in subset with undiagnosed neuropathies confirming that it's a useful tool in diagnosis of neuropathy in the elderly. With minor differences, the aetiological profile in our biopsied neuropathic elderly subjects may reflect the findings in other similar cohorts.

Sensory outcomes after reconstruction of lingual and inferior alveolar nerve discontinuities using processed nerve allograft--a case series

PURPOSE

The present study describes the results of using a processed nerve allograft, Avance Nerve Graft, as an extracellular matrix scaffold for the reconstruction of lingual nerve (LN) and inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) discontinuities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the neurosensory outcomes for 26 subjects with 28 LN and IAN discontinuities reconstructed with a processed nerve allograft was conducted to determine the treatment effectiveness and safety. Sensory assessments were conducted preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgical reconstruction. The outcomes population, those with at least 6 months of postoperative follow-up, included 21 subjects with 23 nerve defects. The neurosensory assessments included brush stroke directional sensation, static 2-point discrimination, contact detection, pressure pain threshold, and pressure pain tolerance. Using the clinical neurosensory testing scale, sensory impairment scores were assigned preoperatively and at each follow-up appointment. Improvement was defined as a score of normal, mild, or moderate.

RESULTS

The neurosensory outcomes from LNs and IANs that had been microsurgically repaired with a processed nerve allograft were promising. Of those with nerve discontinuities treated, 87% had improved neurosensory scores with no reported adverse experiences. Similar levels of improvement, 87% for the LNs and 88% for the IANs, were achieved for both nerve types. Also, 100% sensory improvement was achieved in injuries repaired within 90 days of the injury compared with 77% sensory improvement in injuries repaired after 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that processed nerve allografts are an acceptable treatment option for reconstructing trigeminal nerve discontinuities. Additional studies will focus on reviewing the outcomes of additional cases.

Allograft reconstruction for digital nerve loss

PURPOSE

To investigate the outcomes of digital nerve repairs using processed nerve allograft for defects measuring 30 mm or less.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with 21 digital nerve lacerations in the hand underwent reconstruction with processed nerve allograft. Outcome data for 14 patients with 18 digital nerve lacerations were available for analysis. Postoperative outcome data were recorded at a minimum of 12 months and an average of 15 months. The average nerve gap measured 11 mm (range, 5-30 mm). Outcome measures included postoperative sensory examination as assessed by Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and static and moving 2-point discrimination. Pain was graded using a visual analog scale throughout the recovery period. In addition, patients completed the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand survey before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Using Taras outcome criteria, 7 of 18 (39%) digits had excellent results, 8 of 18 (44%) had good results, 3 of 18 (17%) digits had fair results, and none had poor results. At final follow-up, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing results ranged from 0.08 g to 279 g. Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores recorded at the patient's first postoperative visit averaged 45 (range, 2-80), and final scores averaged 26 (range, 2-43). There were no signs of infection, extrusion, or graft reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that processed nerve allograft provides a safe and effective alternative for the reconstruction of peripheral digital nerve deficits measuring up to 30 mm.

Sensory recovery 1 year after bridging digital nerve defects with collagen tubes

PURPOSE

To investigate digital nerve regeneration following implantation of collagen tubes in a prospective study.

METHODS

Forty-five digital nerve defects (≤ 2.6 cm) in the hand were reconstructed in 35 patients (6 female, 29 male; mean age, 47 y). Nerve regeneration was evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery by applying a sum score comprising static 2-point discrimination, sensory threshold with Semmes-Weinstein monofilament mechanical stimuli, warm/cold sensation, vibration sense, sharp/dull recognition, recognition of numbers, and subjective estimation of the patient. Electroneurography and ultrasound were also performed.

RESULTS

In the distribution of 60% of the operated nerves, very good or good recovery was found. In contrast to basic sensory function, the more complex static 2-point discrimination was more frequently impaired after 1 year. After 6 months, the sum score correlated with electroneurography. The type of injury altered the final sensory nerve function. Circular saw and iatrogenic injuries showed a negative correlation with final sensory nerve function. Complications (infection) were observed in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to the good functional outcome in the majority of cases, the use of collagen tubes is useful to span digital nerve defects up to 2.6 cm.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Sciatic nerve regeneration by cocultured Schwann cells and stem cells on microporous nerve conduits

Cell transplantation is a useful therapy for treating peripheral nerve injuries. The clinical use of Schwann cells (SCs), however, is limited because of their limited availability. An emerging solution to promote nerve regeneration is to apply injured nerves with stem cells derived from various tissues. In this study, different types of allogeneic cells including SCs, adipose-derived adult stem cells (ASCs), dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), and the combination of SCs with ASCs or DPSCs were seeded on nerve conduits to test their efficacy in repairing a 15-mm-long critical gap defect of rat sciatic nerve. The regeneration capacity and functional recovery were evaluated by the histological staining, electrophysiology, walking track, and functional gait analysis after 8 weeks of implantation. An in vitro study was also performed to verify if the combination of cells led to synergistic neurotrophic effects (NGF, BDNF, and GDNF). Experimental rats receiving conduits seeded with a combination of SCs and ASCs had the greatest functional recovery, as evaluated by the walking track, functional gait, nerve conduction velocity (NCV), and histological analysis. Conduits seeded with cells were always superior to the blank conduits without cells. Regarding NCV and the number of blood vessels, conduits seeded with SCs and DPSCs exhibited better values than those seeded with DPSCs only. Results from the in vitro study confirmed the synergistic NGF production from the coculture of SCs and ASCs. It was concluded that coculture of SCs with ASCs or DPSCs in a conduit promoted peripheral nerve regeneration over a critical gap defect.

Usefulness of superficial peroneal nerve/peroneus brevis muscle biopsy in the diagnosis of vasculitic neuropathy

Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic yield of the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN)/peroneus brevis muscle (PBM) biopsy in 43 patients with clinically suspected vasculitic neuropathy was studied. Biopsies were classified as "definite", "suspicious" or "possible" in accordance with established criteria. Vasculitis was detected in 27 patients (21 with non-systemic vasculitis, and six with systemic vasculitis). In patients with "definite" vasculitis (n=13), the sensitivity of SPN/PBM biopsy was 76.4% with 100% specificity. By including patients suspicious for vasculitis (n=10), sensitivity increased to 85.1% but the specificity dropped to 87.5%. The overall diagnostic yield of SPN biopsy in those patients with definite vasculitis was 76.9% (10/13), and 53.8% (7/13) for muscle biopsy. The addition of muscle biopsy increased the diagnostic yield by 23%. Asymmetric nerve fiber loss, Wallerian degeneration and presence of hemosiderin were statistically significant markers of probable vasculitis. Muscle tissue was more likely to show hemosiderin (85.7%) than a nerve biopsy (71%). A combined SPN/PBM biopsy offers excellent diagnostic yield in the diagnosis of vasculitic neuropathy.

New treatment for peripheral nerve defects: reconstruction of a 2 cm, monkey median nerve gap by direct lengthening of both nerve stumps

We have developed a new treatment for peripheral nerve defects: nerve-lengthening method, and confirmed the efficacy and safety of our method using cynomolgus monkeys. A 20-mm defect in the median nerve of monkey's forearms was repaired through the simultaneous lengthening of both nerve stumps with original nerve-lengthening device. To evaluate nerve regeneration after neurorrhaphy, electrophysiological, histological, and functional recovery were examined and compared to the standard autografting. Nerve conduction velocity, axon maturation, and the result of functional test were superior in the nerve-lengthening method than in the autografting. And there were no adverse events associated with our method. We concluded that this method is practical for clinical application.

Reconstruction of digital nerves with collagen conduits

PURPOSE

Digital nerve reconstruction with a biodegradable conduit offers the advantage of providing nerve reconstruction while providing a desirable environment for nerve regeneration. Many conduit materials have been investigated, but there have been few reports of human clinical trials of purified type I bovine collagen conduits.

METHODS

We report a prospective study of 22 isolated digital nerve lacerations in 19 patients reconstructed with a bioabsorbable collagen conduit. The average nerve gap measured 12 mm. An independent observer performed the postoperative evaluation, noting the return of protective sensation, static 2-point discrimination, and moving 2-point discrimination, and recording the patient's pain level using a visual analog scale. Minimal follow-up was 12 months and mean follow-up was 20 months after surgery.

RESULTS

All patients recovered protective sensation. The mean moving 2-point discrimination and static 2-point discrimination measured 5.0 and 5.2 mm, respectively, for those with measurable recovery at final follow-up visit. Excellent results were achieved in 13 of 22 digits, good results in 3 of 22 digits, and fair results in 6 of 22 digits, and there were no poor results. Reported pain scores at the last postoperative visit were measured universally as 0 on the visual analog scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that collagen conduits offer an effective method of reconstruction for digital nerve lacerations. This study confirms that collagen conduits reliably provide a repair that restores nerve function for nerve gaps measuring less than 2 cm.

A prospective randomized study comparing woven polyglycolic acid and autogenous vein conduits for reconstruction of digital nerve gaps

PURPOSE

The optimal management of a nerve gap within the fingers remains an unanswered question in hand surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the sensory recovery, cost, and complication profile of digital nerve repair using autogenous vein and polyglycolic acid conduits.

METHODS

We enrolled patients undergoing repair of digital nerve injuries with gaps precluding primary repair. The minimum gap that was found to preclude primary repair was 4 mm. Each nerve repair was randomized to the type of nerve repair with either a woven polyglycolic acid conduit or autogenous vein. Time required for repair was recorded. We performed sensory testing, consisting of static and moving 2-point discrimination, at 6 and 12 months after repair. We compared patient factors between the 2 groups using chi-square and Student's t-test. We compared sensory recovery between the 2 groups at each time point using Student's t-test and compared time and cost of repair.

RESULTS

We enrolled 42 patients with 76 nerve repairs. Of these, 37 patients (representing 68 repairs) underwent sensory evaluation at the 6-month time point. The median age in this group was 35 years. We repaired 36 nerves with synthetic conduit and 32 with vein. Nerve gaps ranged from 4 to 25 mm (mean, 10 mm). Study groups were not significantly different regarding age, time to repair, gap length, medical history, smoking history, or worker's compensation status. Time to harvest the vein was longer but the average cost of materials and surgery in the vein group was $1,220, compared with $1,269 for synthetic conduit repairs. These differences were not statistically significant. Mean static and moving 2-point discrimination at 6 months for the synthetic conduit group were 8.3 ± 2.0 and 6.6 ± 2.3, respectively, compared with 8.5 ± 1.8 and 7.1 ± 2.2 for the vein group. Values at 12 months for the synthetic conduit group were 7.5 ± 1.9 and 5.6 ± 2.2, compared with 7.6 ± 2.6 and 6.6 ± 2.9 for the vein group. These differences were not statistically significant. Smokers and worker's compensation patients had a worse sensory recovery at 12 months postrepair. There were 2 extrusions in the synthetic conduit group requiring reoperation; however, the difference in extrusion rate was not found to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensory recovery after digital nerve reconstruction with autogenous vein conduit was equivalent to that using polyglycolic acid conduit, with a similar cost profile and fewer postoperative complications.

In vivo study of ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate applied in direct contact with nerves regenerating in a novel nerve-guide

Stitch suture is still the most recommended method to hold a nerve-guide in place but stitch suture is a well known cause of local inflammatory response. Glues of several kinds have been proposed as an alternative but they are not easy to apply in a real surgical setting. In 2006 authors developed a new concept of nerve-guide termed "NeuroBox" which is double-halved, not-degradable and rigid, and allows the use of cyanoacrylic glues. In this study, Authors analyzed histologically the nerve-glue interface. Wistar rats were used as animal model. In group 1, animals were implanted a NeuroBox to promote the regeneration of an experimentally produced 4 mm gap in the sciatic nerve. In group 2, the gap was left without repair ("sham-operated" group). Group 3 was assembled by harvesting 10 contralateral intact nerves to document the normal anatomy. Semi-thin sections for visible light microscopy and ultra-thin sections for Transmission Electron Microscopy were analyzed. Results showed that application of ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate directly to the epineurium produced no significative insult to the underlining nerve fibers nor impaired nerve regeneration. No regeneration occurred in the "sham-operated" group.

Modern surgical management of peripheral nerve gap

The management of peripheral nerve injury requires a thorough understanding of the complex physiology of nerve regeneration. The ability to perform surgery under magnification has improved our understanding of the anatomy of the peripheral nerves. However, the level of functional improvement that can be expected following peripheral nerve injury has plateaued. Advancements in the field of tissue engineering have led to an exciting complement of commercially available products that can be used to bridge peripheral nerve gaps. However, the quest for enhanced options is ongoing. This article provides a review of the current treatment options available following peripheral nerve injury, a summary of the published studies using commercially available nerve conduits and nerve allografts in humans and the emerging hopes for the next generation of nerve conduits with the advancement of nanotechnology.

Practice parameter: the evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy.

METHODS

A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based upon the level of evidence.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

1. Autonomic testing may be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). 2. Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). 3. Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy.

Early clinical outcomes with the use of decellularized nerve allograft for repair of sensory defects within the hand

Nerve conduits have become an established option for repair of sensory deficits of up to 2 cm. More recently, decellularized nerve allograft has also been advocated as an option for nerve repair; however, no clinical studies have examined its efficacy for the treatment of sensory nerve defects. The aim of this study was to examine our early experience with the use of decellularized nerve allograft for repair of segmental nerve defects within the hand and fingers. From July 2007 to March 2008, seven patients who had ten nerve gaps were treated surgically using decellularized nerve allograft. Eight digital and two dorsal sensory nerves were repaired. The etiologies of the nerve defects were traumatic nerve transection in eight defects and neuroma resection and reconstruction in two defects. All of the affected nerves were pure sensory fibers. Functional recovery was evaluated by blinded hand therapist using moving and static two point discrimination tests. Implantation sites were also evaluated for any signs of infection, rejection, or graft extrusion. There were five men and two women with a mean age of 44 years (range 23-65). Mean nerve graft length was 2.23 cm with a range of 0.5-3 cm. Mean follow up time was 9 months (range 5-12). Average two point discrimination was 4.4 mm moving and 5.5 mm static at last recorded follow-up. There were no wound infections observed around the graft material and sensory improvement was observed in all of the patients despite this short-term follow-up. Re-exploration of two fingers was required for flexor tendon rupture in one and flexor tendon tenolysis in the other. In both cases, the nerve allograft was visualized and appeared well incorporated in the repair site. Decellularized nerve allografts were capable of returning adequate sensation in nerve defects ranging from 0.5 to 3 cm. There were no cases of infection or rejection. Decellularized nerve allograft may provide an option for segmental nerve gaps beyond 2 cm. Randomized comparative studies will be required to determine efficacy in comparison to collagen conduits or nerve autograft.

Comparison of regeneration results of prefabricated nerve graft, autogenous nerve graft, and vein graft in repair of nerve defects

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectivity of prefabricated nerve grafts in the repairing nerve defect and to compare them with the autogenous nerve graft and vein graft. Four groups were created, each containing 10 rats. First, nerve prefabrication was carried out in groups I and II during 8 weeks. For this purpose, jugular vein graft was sutured to the epineural windows on the peroneal and tibial nerve at the right side in an end-to-side fashion. To create neurotrophic stimulus, partial incision was performed on the nerves in group I, and gene therapy was performed by plasmid injecting to the adjacent muscles in group II. At the end of the eighth week, prefabricated nerve grafts, jugular vein, and the axons passing through it were taken. Then, gap was created on the left peroneal nerve in all groups. Defect on the peroneal nerve was repaired by using the prefabricated nerve grafts in groups I and II, the autogenous nerve graft in group III, and the vein in group IV. Assessment of nerve regeneration was performed by using electromyography. Morphological assessment was performed after follow-up period. According to electrophysiological and morphological results, the results of first three groups were similar. There was no statistically significant difference between three groups. Prefabricated nerve graft is as effective as autogenous nerve graft, and it can be used in the repair of nerve defects as autogenous nerve graft as an alternative.

Evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review)

Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy. A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based on the level of evidence. (1) Autonomic testing may be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). (2) Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). (3) Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy.

Sequelae following sural nerve biopsy in type 1 diabetic subjects

OBJECTIVES

To detect post-operative sequelae of sural nerve biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire mailed to type 1 diabetic patients (n = 24; male/female 23/1; reply n = 23) 2 years after biopsy.

RESULTS

Type 1 diabetic patients (age 56 [11]; median [interquartile range]) had a long duration of diabetes (DM; 20 [19] years) and all had neuropathy. Three out of 24 patients developed infection (two superficial and one deep) and one had a post-operative bleeding. Less frequent pain among the patients were reported from one centre. About one-third or more of the patients still complained of pain, mostly mild, in the biopsy area and paraesthesia in the foot 2 years after surgery. More than two-thirds of the patients were reluctant for further biopsy; a crucial information in drug trial planning.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequelae of a sural nerve biopsy occur in type 1 DM. The risk for wound infections should be considered.

Repair of lacerated peripheral nerves with nerve conduits

Peripheral nerve lesions are relatively common injuries encountered by hand surgeons. These injuries are notorious for causing significant and potentially long-standing impairment to hand function. Numerous surgical techniques with varying degrees of success have been described to treat this injury. The evolution of peripheral nerve repair has led to the development of the nerve conduit, a surgical technique that functionally bridges the gap between transected nerves. We discuss a brief history and evolution of nerve conduits and offer our preferred technique for peripheral nerve repair with a collagen nerve conduit. In addition, we offer case studies and postoperative rehabilitation goals and present early results associated with this type of repair.