Computed tomography-assisted management of splenic trauma

Prognostic Factors and Clinical Features of Neonatal Splenic Rupture/Hemorrhage: Two Cases Reports and Literature Review

Background: Neonatal splenic rupture/hemorrhage (SRH), an extremely rare and potentially fatal presentation, can spontaneously resolve without surgical treatment; However, treatment approaches remain controversial. The present study aimed to describe and analyze the clinical features and therapies of neonatal SRH and therapeutic approaches. Methods: We present the cases of two patients and review another 37 cases reported in English-literature. The literature search included all articles published in PUBMED from inception between January 1968 and December 2019. Demographic data, precipitating factors, clinical characteristics including presenting symptoms and signs, presenting time, age at SRH presentation, imaging findings, as well as treatments and outcomes were analyzed. Results: In addition to the two cases treated at our hospital, 37 neonates with SRH were reported during the study period. The rate of full-term neonates was 72% (28/39). The cause was idiopathic in most cases, and congenital coagulation disorders were underlying causes in 13% (5/39) of the cases. The most common presenting symptom and sign of neonatal SRH were pallor or anemia, followed by abdominal discoloration/distension. Additionally, 18% (7/39) of the cases presented with scrotal hematoma or swelling. The age at SRH presentation ranged between 3 h and 5 days of age. Abdominal ultrasonography or computed tomography was used as the diagnostic tool. Twenty-seven cases (69%) received surgical management. The prognosis was comparable between the neonates treated with splenectomy and those treated with non-surgical approaches. The mortality rate was 18% (7/39) in the study cohort. SRH presentation at ≤12 h of age was associated with higher mortality compared to SRH presenting time at >12 h of age (odds ratio 25.0, 95% CI 2.514-248.575, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Our literature review revealed that the mortality rate of neonatal SRH was 18% and that the mortality risk was higher in neonates presenting with SRH symptoms and signs at ≤12 h of age.

Analysis of the need for surgery for different anatomical locations of splenic injury and radiologic intervention

The splenic surface can be anatomically divided into the visceral surface connected to major blood vessels and the diaphragmatic surface attached to the diaphragm. This study aimed to investigate differences in future treatment and outcomes according to the anatomical location of splenic injuries following abdominal trauma. Patients who were treated at a single trauma center between January 2011 and April 2018 were included. The presence of lacerations or hematoma on the visceral surface was evaluated via computed tomography. Differences in the location of splenic surgery between a group that underwent surgical or radiologic intervention and a group that received conservative care only were analyzed. Of 355 patients with splenic injury analyzed, the total mortality rate was 15.2%. A total of 167 patients underwent surgery and angiographic embolization, and 168 received conservative care only. Splenic injuries involved the visceral surface in 127 and 105 patients in the respective groups. Significant differences in the incidence of splenic injuries involving the visceral surface were found between the two groups in the univariate and logistic regression analyses. The likelihood of needing surgery and treatments such as embolization was higher for cases of splenic injury involving the visceral surface than for splenic injuries that did not involve the visceral surface. Through additional research, it may become possible to analyze the location of a splenic injury to determine an effective and safe method of treatment and accurately predict a prognosis. Clin. Anat. 33:516-521, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[Rare complication of colonoscopy in a patient on anticoagulant: haemoperitoneum by rupture of a subcapsular hematoma of the spleen, clinical case]

La coloscopie à visée diagnostique et/ou thérapeutique est un examen invasif fréquemment pratiquée de nos jours. La perforation colique et l'hémorragie digestive en sont les principales complications. La survenue d'un hémopéritoine par rupture d'un hématome sous-capsulaire splénique est une complication extrêmement rare et potentiellement mortelle de la coloscopie. Un traumatisme splénique minime passé inaperçu et la prise d'anticoagulant en sont des facteurs favorisants. Nous présentons le cas d'une rupture d'un hématome sous-capsulaire de la rate après une coloscopie, survenue chez un patient de 70 ans porteur d'une valve mitrale mécanique sous acénocoumarol à dose hypocaogulante. La nécessité d'obtention d'une anti coagulation rapidement efficace et l'instabilité hémodynamique avaient justifiée la réalisation d'une splénectomie. L’évolution était favorable. A travers cette observation clinique nous discutons les mécanismes et les modalités de prise en charge devant cette complication.

Splenic trauma: what is new?

Evaluation for splenic injury is an important component of patient assessment after blunt abdominal trauma. Key imaging modalities include ultrasound, particularly for rapid identification of hemoperitoneum, and computed tomography (CT), which permits a more detailed and accurate determination of splenic integrity. Specific findings at contrast-enhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) should prompt the consideration of catheter angiography with arterial embolization as an adjunct to nonsurgical management. This article reviews the roles of imaging in the management of splenic trauma, illustrates the MDCT appearance of various splenic injuries, and discusses imaging-based indications for operative and angiographic intervention.

Abdominal trauma: from operative to nonoperative management

The nonoperative care of intraabdominal trauma in the polytraumatised patient greatly depends on imaging techniques. The haemodynamically unstable patient should undergo expedient sonography to rule out abdominal haemorrhage. The use of computer tomography (CT) in this difficult patient group is also currently evaluated, however it takes specific amendments to the protocol and institution. In the hemodynamically stable patient however, computer tomography is the modality of choice to evaluate the injured abdomen. Nonoperative treatment can be successful in up to 80% of selected cases. Adjuncts to nonoperative care include embolisation of the spleen and liver in cases of arterial bleeding, and endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreaticography (ERCP) and stenting for injuries to the biliary tree.

An unusual presentation of non pathological delayed splenic rupture: a case report

The diagnosis of Delayed Splenic Rupture poses a major challenge to even the most astute clinician, as it can mimic other medical emergencies. We present a case of an unusual presentation of delayed splenic rupture in a 23-year-old Caucasian man, who presented to the emergency department with a 2 day history of left upper quadrant pain. He initially denied any history of trauma. There were no signs of generalized peritonisim on examination but his haemoglobin level was low (8.9 gm/dl) for which there was no obvious cause identified. He was resuscitated and a computed tomography of the abdomen was performed. This revealed complete rupture of the splenic capsule with haemorrhagic fluid in the abdomen. With the computed tomography abdomen findings and further questioning of the patient, the only potential precipitating event that he could remember was a minor kick to the left upper quadrant more than 2 weeks ago while playing football. An urgent splenectomy was performed and histology confirmed complete rupture of the splenic capsule with a large adherent haematoma to the capsule. This case illustrates the difficulty in diagnosing delayed splenic rupture especially when accurate history is not available. A high index of suspicion is essential as delay in diagnosis can be fatal. Early diagnosis in suspected cases can be achieved by performing computed tomography of the abdomen.

[Splenic trauma: an unusual complication of colonoscopy with polypectomy]

Nowadays, colonoscopy has become an invaluable tool in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the colon and rectum. Colonoscopy is still an invasive exam with several complications. The most common complications are perforation and bleeding, which occur in up to 1% after diagnostic colonoscopy and 3% of patients undergoing therapeutic colonoscopy. Less common complications include pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, colonic volvulus, hernia incarceration, retroperitoneal abscess and mesenteric tear. Splenic rupture is a rare and potentially lethal colonoscopic complication with less than 45 cases reported in the world. The overall incidence is 0.004%. Mechanisms of injury and available treatment options remain discussed. We present a case of splenic rupture after colonoscopy with polypectomy in a 73-year-old woman managed first with nonoperative treatment and nine days later with surgical treatment. As the indications for colonoscopy expand, including the introduction of mass screening for colorectal cancer, endoscopists should be increasingly aware of that life-threatening complication after colonoscopy and know the emergency treatment.

Early discharge after nonoperative management for splenic injuries: increased patient risk caused by late failure?

BACKGROUND

With increasing experience and knowledge about nonoperative management of splenic injury (NOMSI), patients are being discharged early and possibly placed at risk for late failure of NOMSI and its associated complications. To evaluate if blunt trauma patients managed by NOMSI can be safely discharged early, because failure after the third day from injury occurs infrequently and is not associated with added morbidity.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who failed NOMSI from January 1993 to December 2005 in an academic level 1 trauma center were reviewed. Patients who failed NOMSI within 3 days (early failure) were compared with patients who failed it after 3 days (late failure) to identify characteristics that may help predict late failure. Primary outcomes were complications and death related to late failure.

RESULTS

Of 691 patients admitted with blunt trauma to the spleen, 499 (72%) had NOMSI and 36 (7%) failed it. Early failure was recorded in 26 patients (5%) and late failure in 10 (2%). Late bleeding was the cause of failure in all patients with late failure and occurred in 8 +/- 6 (mean +/- SD) days after admission (4-8 days in 7 patients and 12-22 days in 3). When comparing age, Injury Severity Score, hemotocrit on admission, preoperative blood transfusions, and grade of splenic injury, no differences were found between patients with early and late failure. All but 1 patient with late failure were still in the hospital for associated injuries at the time of failure. No patient died, had delayed diagnosis, or suffered added morbidity because of late failure.

CONCLUSION

Late failure occurs infrequently, unpredictably, and almost always in patients who are still in the hospital for associated injuries. In-hospital observation beyond the third day after injury is not necessary for most patients with splenic injury, who have no other reason to remain hospitalized.

[Medical imaging in the management of abdominal trauma]

There is a marked trend toward nonoperative management of abdominal trauma. This has been possible thanks to the advances in imaging and interventional techniques. Computed tomography (CT), angiography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can guide the nonoperative management of abdominal trauma.

Abdominal trauma: a disease in evolution

BACKGROUND

The last decade has seen many changes in the way we investigate and manage abdominal injuries. This study assessed the pattern of abdominal injury and its investigation in patients admitted to a major trauma centre.

METHODS

A retrospective registry review of all adult trauma patients admitted to Liverpool Hospital between January 1996 and December 2003 was undertaken. All adult trauma patients were included, identifying mechanism of injury, injury severity score, abbreviated injury score for the abdomen, investigations and intervention. The study period was divided (period 1 from 1996 to 1999, period 2 from 2000 to 2003) and the two periods compared to assess change.

RESULTS

The study involved 1224 patients with abdominal injuries. Of these, 969 (79%) were a result of blunt trauma. The main causes were road accidents (61%), interpersonal violence (24%) and falls (7%). Penetrating injury increased from 16% to 25% between the two periods. There were 1274 intra-abdominal injuries, made up of 607 solid organ (liver (n = 220, 36%), spleen (n = 195, 32%), renal (n = 144, 24%) ), 291 hollow viscus (small bowel (n = 160, 55%), large bowel (n = 104, 36%) ) and 168 vascular. Four hundred and thirty-six (36%) patients underwent laparotomy, 65% for blunt trauma. Between the two periods there was a 46% decrease in the use of diagnostic peritoneal lavage, with a 40% increase in computed tomography and 325% increase in focused assessment with sonography for trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

This study defined abdominal injury pattern and identified a significant shift in mechanism of injury and abdominal investigation at a major trauma centre during an 8-year study period. Abdominal trauma is indeed a disease in evolution.

Blunt trauma to the spleen: ultrasonographic findings

The spleen is the most frequently injured organ in adults who sustain blunt abdominal trauma. Splenic trauma accounts for approximately 25% to 30% of all intra-abdominal injuries. The management of splenic injury has undergone rapid change over the last decade, with increasing emphasis on splenic salvage and non-operative management. Identifying the presence and degree of splenic injury is critical in triaging the management of patients. Imaging is integral in the identification of splenic injuries, both at the time of injury and during follow-up. Although CT remains the gold standard in blunt abdominal trauma, US continues to play an important role in assessing the traumatized spleen. This pictorial review illustrates the various ultrasonographic appearances of the traumatized spleen. Correlation with other imaging is presented and complications that occur during follow-up are described.

Utilidad de las mallas reabsorbibles en los traumatismos esplénicos

INTRODUCTION

The spleen is not an essential organ for survival but given its important role in immunologic functions its preservation is justified.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze our experience with absorbable meshes applied to treat splenic injuries.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We performed an ambispective study. From July 1999 to February 2004, 30 patients were treated for traumatic splenic injuries. Ultrasonography and/or spiral computed tomography scanning was carried out for the initial screening evaluation and grading of splenic injuries. The New Injury Severity Score (NISS) was calculated to quantify the severity of trauma. Operative splenic preservation was performed according to established selection criteria. Splenorrhaphy with prosthetic material was accomplished by means of a bag of polyglycolic acid mesh measuring 18 cm yen 23 cm (Dexon mesh) that was hand tailored and wrapped around the entire surface of the spleen.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with splenic traumatic injuries were treated. The mean age was 36.2 +/- 16.6 years. Twenty-three patients (76.6%) required splenectomy, nonoperative management was achieved in 1 patient (3.3%), and splenorrhaphy with prosthetic material was carried out in 6 patients (20%). Grade III injuries were present in 13 patients (43.3%), grade IV in 13 patients (43.3%), and grade V in 4 patients (13.3%). The mean NISS was 18.9 +/- 9.1. No significant differences were detected between the two groups (splenectomy or mesh splenorrhaphy) in NISS (p=.53) or grade of splenic injuries (p=.69). Morbidity was related to the presence of multiple injuries (p=.002) and was greater in the group with mesh splenorrhaphy (p=.002); however, there were no septic complications in this group. A positive correlation was observed between the length of hospital stay and NISS (p=.01). The length of hospital stay was also significantly associated with the presence of multiple injuries (p=.005) and with morbidity (p=.0002), but was not associated with the type of surgery carried out (p=.17). No complications were observed during follow-up (median of 28 months) in patients who underwent splenic salvage procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Mesh splenorrhaphy is a suitable therapeutic option for patients with severe trauma, grade IV splenic injuries, or delayed rupture of the spleen. Both morbidity and length of hospital stay were associated with the presence of multiple injuries rather than with the type of surgery carried out. The safety, effectiveness and absence of septic complications related to the use of prosthetic material in splenic trauma salvage surgery were notable.

Congenital cleft spleen with CT scan appearance of high-grade splenic laceration after blunt abdominal trauma

The spiral computed tomography (CT) scan has made the diagnosis of traumatic injury increasingly rapid and accurate, especially in cases of solid parenchymal organ injury that follows blunt abdominal trauma. Nonetheless, this valuable method of diagnosis can be confounded when anatomical variances are encountered in the setting of concomitant associated injuries. We present here a case where a congenitally bi-lobed spleen was diagnosed by CT scan as an apparent high-grade splenic laceration, prompting emergent laparotomy.

Splenic rupture in a newborn

Traumatic rupture of the spleen in the newborn is a rare event and is seldom reported in the literature. It can occur to an abnormally enlarged spleen or to a normal spleen. In the latter, it usually is associated with difficult delivery. Previously, the majority of patients died probably because of delayed or missed diagnoses. The classic presentation is a triad of bleeding, abdominal distension, and hemoperitoneum. High index of suspicion and improvement in diagnostic tools like ultrasonography and computed tomography are important contributions in early diagnosis so that appropriate treatment can be implemented. Splenectomy is no longer the standard treatment because it increases the chance of postsplenectomy sepsis. Instead, treatment should aim for hemostasis and preservation of spleen. The authors present a case of traumatic rupture of spleen in a normal newborn with normal labor and delivery. The first symptom began at 16 hours of age and evolved to a full-blown classic picture. The baby was saved without splenectomy, and the recovery was smooth and uneventful. This is probably the first reported case of a patient treated without splenectomy in this locality. Discussion of the condition and review of the literature also are presented.

Nonoperative Management of Blunt Splenic and Hepatic Trauma in the Pediatric Population: Significant Differences between Adult and Pediatric Surgeons?

Although operative management was the preferred method of treating blunt abdominal trauma in the past, recent literature and practice recommend a nonsurgical approach to most pediatric splenic and hepatic injuries. The majority of data supporting the safety and efficacy of this nonoperative approach are derived from university trauma programs with a pediatric center where care was managed by pediatric surgeons only. To evaluate the applicability of this approach in a regional trauma center where pediatric patients are managed by pediatric and non-pediatric surgeons we reviewed the experience at a Level II community trauma center. Fifty-four children (16 years of age or less) were admitted between April 1992 and April 1998 after sustaining blunt traumatic splenic and/or hepatic injuries. There were 37 (69%) males and 17 (31%) females; the average age was 11 years (range 4 months to 16 years). Of the 54 patients 34 (63%) sustained splenic injuries, 17 (31%) sustained hepatic injuries, and three (6%) sustained both splenic and hepatic injuries. All of these injuries were diagnosed by CT scan or during laparotomy. The average Injury Severity Score was 14.9 with a range from four to 57. Of the 47 patients initially admitted for nonoperative management one patient failed nonoperative management and required operative intervention. In our study 98 per cent (46 of 47 patients) of pediatric patients were successfully managed nonoperatively. Complications of nonoperative management occurred in two patients. Both developed splenic pseudocysts after splenic injury, which required later operative repair. These data are comparable with those from university trauma programs and confirm that nonoperative management is safe in a community trauma center. The majority of children with blunt splenic and hepatic trauma can be successfully treated without surgery, in a regional trauma center treated by nonpediatric trauma surgeons, if the decision is based on careful initial evaluation, aggressive resuscitation, and close observation of their hemodynamic stability.

Overuse of splenic scoring and computed tomographic scans

BACKGROUND

As the most commonly injured abdominal organ in blunt trauma, the management of splenic injury has undergone evolution. The risk of blood transfusions administered in an attempt to save the spleen has lowered the threshold for operation and also expanded the limits for nonoperative management. An in-depth analysis was carried out of risk factors on patients requiring immediate surgery and those who fail non-operative management based on organ injury scaling grading by computed tomographic (CT) scan and operation. The application of nonoperative management in the elderly population and the use of follow-up CT scanning and sonography in the outpatient setting was also examined.

METHODS

Between January of 1991 and June of 1996, 226 consecutive blunt splenic trauma, injured patients at a Level I trauma center were evaluated. All subsequent CT scans and sonograms in the inpatient and outpatient setting were analyzed. The Student's t test, Pearson chi2 analysis with Yates correction, and analysis of variance were used to compare between and among groups.

RESULTS

There were 153 men (67.7%), an average age of 34.8 years, an average Injury Severity Score of 24.4, and 28 deaths (12%). There was a significant difference with respect to Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Revised Trauma Score, units of packed red blood cells transfused, length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, mean splenic injury grade, and cost between patients observed initially and those operated on initially. There was no significant difference in age between the two groups. Of 170 patients, 37 patients (22%) who had an initial CT scan underwent immediate exploratory laparotomy. The remaining 133 patients (78%) had nonoperative management; however, 15 patients (11%) failed the period of observation. Five in this group had a laparotomy secondary to other causes and another six were operated on within 24 hours of their injury for their splenic injury. Thus, only four of the nonoperative management patients (3%) actually failed nonoperative splenic management after 24 hours of injury. There were 100 second CT scans obtained. Three of these patients, who had developed hemodynamic instability, required operation for a bleeding spleen. The subsequent CT scan was confirmatory in these three patients who resided in the intensive care unit. All other CT scans and sonograms for clinically unremarkable patients failed to yield any alteration in care based on the scans.

CONCLUSION

Blunt splenic injured patients can be safely observed; however, there are certain risk factors in those requiring immediate surgery and those failing nonoperative management. The CT scan underestimates injury, possibly related to a progression of bleeding found at the time of operation. No outpatient studies altered the course of management. Age also did not influence outcome. Thus, in the dedicated trauma center, nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury patients does not lead to undue morbidity or mortality. Once discharged, follow-up radiographs in asymptomatic patients are not necessary.

[Laparoscopic splenorraphy using a resorbable prosthesis in splenic injuries. Apropos of 5 cases]

STUDY AIM

The aim of this retrospective study is to report five cases of laparoscopic splenorraphy with an absorbable perisplenic mesh for splenic injury.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

From January 1996 to February 1998, three men and two women (mean age: 52 years) were included in this study. The splenic lesions were due to either a fall (n = 3), a traffic accident (n = 1), or pleural paracenthesis in a patient with mediastinitis after valvular replacement. Splenic injury was recognized by ultrasonography. The patients were operated as either emergency cases (n = 2), or within 24 hours (n = 3). The procedure included evacuation of the hemoperitineum, total liberation of the spleen, and splenic hemostasis with a perisplenic mesh which was used in open surgery. The mesh placed behind the spleen, covering its superior and inferior poles, was unrolled forwards and burses progressively tightened.

RESULTS

There was no conversion, no mortality, no morbidity. In the four injured patients, the mean duration of surgery was 120 minutes (70-180), without any blood transfusion, and the patients were discharged on d4 or 5. The fifth patient, after valvular replacement, was operated on with anticoagulation. The mean duration of surgery was 270 minutes. Four blood units were necessary. He was discharged at d26.

CONCLUSION

This technique combines the advantages of the perisplenic mesh which is efficient and safe, with the advantages of laparoscopic surgery which simplifies the postoperative course. It can only be used in case of isolated splenic injury in patients with stable hemodynamic condition.

Evaluation of the patient with blunt abdominal trauma: an evidence based approach

Patients with blunt abdominal trauma present a special challenge to the emergency physician. Physical examination is often unreliable, even if the patient is awake, and the frequent co-existence of head injury exacerbates this problem. This article examines the evidence basis of three diagnostic modalities in evaluating blunt abdominal trauma: DPL (the time-honored test); CT scanning (the current standard of care); and abdominal sonography (the emerging standard--especially for examination conducted in the trauma room). A proposed algorithm for the appropriate use of these modalities is also presented.

Management of blunt splenic trauma in patients older than 55 years. Southern Connecticut Regional Trauma Quality Assurance Committee

BACKGROUND

Many experts have suggested that blunt splenic trauma in patients older than 55 years should not be managed by observation because of supposed increased fragility of the spleen and decreased physiologic reserve in elderly patients. We sought to determine the outcome of nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma in patients older than 55 years.

METHODS

For the years 1994 through 1996, data for patients with splenic injury older than 55 years from seven trauma centers in a single state were reviewed.

RESULTS

Blunt splenic trauma occurred in 41 patients older than 55 years. Eight patients were excluded from further analysis because of death from massive associated injuries within 24 hours of admission. The remaining 33 patients (mean age, 72+/-10 years) were divided into two groups: immediate exploration (10 patients) and observation (23 patients). Observation of blunt splenic injury failed in 4 of 23 patients (17%). No patient deaths were related to the method of management of the splenic injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Observation of the elderly patient with blunt splenic trauma has an acceptable failure rate of 17%.