Cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis

Thromboembolism after cardiac surgery in a patient with cancer-related thrombosis and severe thrombocytopenia: A case report

RATIONALE

Patients with cancer have elevated risk of both venous thromboembolism and bleeding compared with patients without cancer due to cancer- and patient-specific factors. Balancing the increased and competing risks of clotting and bleeding in these patients can be difficult because management of cancer-associated thrombosis requires anticoagulation despite its known increased risks for bleeding. The adjustment of blood transfusion or cessation of anticoagulants can be a challenge in surgical diagnosis or treatment of cancer patients with such an imbalanced coagulate status.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 45-year-old woman with no underlying disease was suspected of ovarian cancer and was awaiting diagnostic laparoscopic exploration surgery.

DIAGNOSES

While waiting for the surgery, the patient developed chest pain and underwent stent insertion under diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Two weeks later, endocarditis developed, and replacement of the aortic valve and mitral valve was planned. In addition, the patient developed multiple thromboembolisms and was administered anticoagulants to eliminate vegetation of valves and multiple thromboses. Her blood test showed anemia (7.4 g/dL) and severe thrombocytopenia (24 × 109/L).

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent double valve replacement.

OUTCOMES

A color change of the left lower extremity was noted 5 hours after double valve replacement, and angiography was performed. Thrombectomy was performed under diagnosis of thrombosis in the left iliac artery. One month later, the patient underwent laparoscopic exploration surgery as scheduled.

LESSONS

This case will help establish the criteria of blood coagulation for surgical treatment of cancer patients with imbalanced clotting and bleeding.

Challenges encountered with argatroban anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass

Use of argatroban as an alternative to heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia has gained some attention in the past two decades. Dosing of argatroban during CPB is complex due to lack of complete understanding of its pharmacokinetic profile and the various elements during CPB that may alter its plasma levels. We report a case where the challenges in dosing argatroban led to failure to provide adequate anticoagulation during CPB, as evidenced by clot formation in the oxygenator, and extensive bleeding in the postoperative period.

Formation of intracardiac thrombus during cardiopulmonary bypass despite full heparinization and adequate activated clotting time -A case report-

We reports a case of a newly formed thrombus in the left atrial appendage during cardiopulmonary bypass detected by transesophageal echocardiography in a patient with chronic atrial fibrillation and mitral stenosis. This case alerts the anesthesiologists of possible thrombus formation despite full heparinization during cardiac surgery and the importance of a comprehensive echocardiography examination.

Anticoagulants in coronary artery disease

Anticoagulant therapy for acute coronary syndromes is becoming more complex as newer agents are added to unfractionated heparin and warfarin. The anticoagulants used in current clinical practice are low molecular weight heparins, direct thrombin inhibitors, and heparinoids. Properties of and recent clinical trial data regarding these newer anticoagulants are reviewed in reference to current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines.

Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia presenting with multiple arteriovenous thromboses: case report

Background

Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis, albeit rare, is a severe side effect of heparin exposure. It can occur within one month after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with manifestation of different thrombotic events.

Case presentation

A 59-year-old man presented with weakness, malaise, bilateral lower limb pitting edema and a suspected diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis 18 days after CABG. Heparin infusion was administered as an anticoagulant. Clinical and paraclinical work-up revealed multiple thrombotic events (stroke, renal failure, deep vein thrombosis, large clots in heart chambers) and 48 ×10³/μl platelet count, whereupon heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was suspected. Heparin was discontinued immediately and an alternative anticoagulant agent was administered, as a result of which platelet count recovered. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, which causes thrombosis, is a serious side effect of heparin therapy. It is worthy of note that no case of delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis associated with cardiopulmonary bypass surgery has thus far been reported in Iran.

Conclusion

Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia should be suspected in any patient presenting with arterial or venous thromboembolic disorders after recent heparin therapy, even though the heparin exposure dates back to more than a week prior to presentation; and it should be ruled-out before the initiation of heparin therapy.

Clinical Presentation, Temporal Relationship, and Outcome in Thirty-Three Patients With Type 2 Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia After Cardiotomy

BACKGROUND

Type 2 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an uncommon but often fatal complication of heparin, frequently difficult to diagnose after cardiac surgery. In this series, we record the clinical presentation, temporal relationship, and treatment outcome of patients diagnosed with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia postoperatively.

METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive patients (1.1%) with a diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia established by a greater than 50% drop in platelet count with or without a thrombotic event and a positive platelet factor-4 assay were reviewed. We recorded the clinical presentation, the time to presentation, treatment, and outcome (thrombosis, mortality). Univariate analysis was performed on 13 preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables.

RESULTS

The cohort was at increased mortality risk as a result of age (69.4 years), reduced cardiac function (46.8%), nonbypass operations (57.6%), emergency surgery (21.2%), and implantation of three assist devices. The mean time to suspect heparin-induced thrombocytopenia postoperatively was 5.4 days, with 22 cases (66.6%) occurring within 5 days. All patients had previous (within 3 months) exposure to heparin, and 66.6% had ongoing treatment with heparin before surgery. Overall mortality was 33%; thrombotic complications occurred in 15 patients (45.5%), with a mortality of 7 (46.6%) despite immediate cessation of heparin and treatment with a nonheparin analog. Thrombocytopenia without thrombosis occurred in 18 patients (54.5%), but a subgroup of 5 patients with nonthrombotic complications accounted for the 4 (22.2%) deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after cardiac surgery is uncommon but may occur within 5 days of surgery, further complicating diagnosis and treatment. Thrombotic complications result in a high mortality despite treatment with a nonheparin analog, and a subgroup of patients with thrombocytopenia fared poorly.

CABG without using heparin in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Despite the low incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis, these two syndromes are much disputed in life-threatening conditions especially in cardiovascular surgery where heparin is routinely used. Nowadays a pharmacological agent that can exactly replace heparin does not exist. Many of the drugs called "alternative drugs to heparin" are associated with a high risk of hemorrhagic complications and an increased need of blood transfusions. Neither the use of heparin nor "alternative drugs to heparin" may be the best way to revascularize a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

Coronary artery bypass grafting without using heparin was performed in a 62-year-old male patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. He received clopidogrel and acethyl salicylic acid for 2 days before operation. He was operated off-pump using special maneuvers.

RESULTS

He was discharged on postoperative day 5 after an uneventful course and is doing well in the sixth month postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our investigations in English literature, this surgical technique and coronary artery bypass grafting without using heparin is firstly described in this article. Increasing the number of cases will show the reliability and safety of this method.

Cardiopulmonary bypass with bivalirudin in type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with type II heparin induced-thrombocytopenia poses significant challenges. Inadequate pharmacokinetic profiles, monitoring, reversibility, and availability often limit alternative anticoagulation strategies. Bivalirudin, a semisynthetic direct thrombin inhibitor, was recently approved for use in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Its unique properties, including a relatively short half-life, an anticoagulation effect that closely correlates with activated clotting time, and an alternate metabolic pathway for elimination, make bivalirudin an attractive agent for cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with type II heparin induced-thrombocytopenia. We report our experience using bivalirudin in 2 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in pediatric cardiac surgery: an emerging cause of morbidity and mortality

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is immunogenic, and heparin-dependent antibodies can be demonstrated 5 to 10 days postoperatively in 25% to 50% of adult postcardiac surgery patients. In a minority of these cases (1% to 3% if UFH is continued longer than 1 week) these antibodies strongly activate platelets, causing thrombocytopenia and massive thrombin generation (HIT syndrome). HIT is an intensely procoagulant disorder, and in adult cardiac surgery patients carries both significant thrombotic morbidity (38% to 81%) and mortality (28%). Despite the ubiquitous use of UFH in pediatric intensive care units, and the repeated and sustained exposures to UFH in neonates and young children with congenital heart disease, HIT has been infrequently recognized and reported in this patient population. However, emerging experience at our institution and elsewhere suggests that HIT is significantly under-recognized in pediatric congenital heart disease patients, and may in fact have an incidence and associated thrombotic morbidity and mortality in this patient group comparable to that seen in adult cardiac surgery patients. This article will review HIT in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease and emphasize the special challenges posed in clinical recognition, laboratory diagnosis, and treatment of HIT in this patient group. We will also outline our experience with the off-label use of the direct thrombin inhibitor, argatroban, in pediatric patients with HIT.

Preoperative detection and management of immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing heart surgery with iloprost

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate our protocol for the identification and management of patients with immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Among 1518 patients who underwent cardiac surgery between June 1998 and May 2001, 32 (2.1%) presented with platelet counts less than 150,000/mm3 preoperatively or a history of prolonged (>3 days) intravenous exposure to heparin or both. These 32 patients were evaluated with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibodies against heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. Platelets of patients with detected antibodies were tested with the prostacyclin analog iloprost for inhibition of heparin aggregation and determination of the inhibiting concentration and corresponding intravenous infusion rate of iloprost. Patients with antibodies received heparin after complete platelet inhibition with iloprost infusion. Hypotension was prevented or treated with intravenous noradrenaline. Ten randomly selected patients with similar preoperative characteristics, no previous extended exposure to heparin, and normal platelet counts served as controls.

RESULTS

Ten of the 32 patients (group A, 31.3%) and none of the controls had antibodies against heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. Patients in group A underwent surgery with iloprost (6-24 ng.kg(-1).min(-1)) and had their blood pressure maintained at greater than 95 mm Hg with norepinephrine infusion (1-4 microg.kg(-1).min(-1)). Operative mortality was zero. There were no thrombotic complications or bleeding requiring exploration. One patient in group A bled 1310 mL/6 hours but did not need exploration. There was no difference in postoperative blood loss and morbidity between groups. Platelet counts were reduced by 12.5% +/- 8.7% (group A) and 38.1% +/- 15.2% (control) (P <.001) 1 hour postoperatively and reached preoperative values by the fifth postoperative day.

CONCLUSIONS

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia can be detected preoperatively among patients with a low platelet count or a history of prolonged heparin exposure or both. Cardiac surgery can be safely undertaken using iloprost-induced platelet inhibition during heparinization.

Off-pump right atrial thrombectomy for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis

This report describes a 72-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation who presented with lower extremity ischemia secondary to thromboembolism. After lower extremity thrombectomy, the patient developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT). Her postoperative course was complicated by recurrent supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia, secondary to a mobile thrombus in the right atrium extending into the right ventricle. Because administration of heparin was contraindicated, the patient underwent off-pump right atrial thrombectomy during a brief period of inflow occlusion. Postoperatively, she was placed on lepirudin. Her platelet count normalized without any further thrombotic episodes, and she was discharged on warfarin.

Pharmacologic platelet anesthesia by glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex antagonist and argatroban during in vitro extracorporeal circulation

OBJECTIVE

Contact between blood and the synthetic surfaces of a cardiopulmonary bypass circuit leads to platelet activation, and resultant platelet dysfunction contributes to postoperative bleeding. We compared the effects of various platelet inhibitors on preservation of platelet function during simulated cardiopulmonary bypass circulation.

METHODS

Fresh human blood was recirculated in an in vitro cardiopulmonary bypass model circuit. We measured various platelet activation markers including expressions of PAC-1 and P-selectin, annexin V binding, and microparticle formations by means of whole-blood flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Two types of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex antagonists, peptide-mimetic FK633 and abciximab and prostaglandin E(1), significantly prevented platelet loss and the increase in binding of PAC-1, an antibody specific for fibrinogen receptor on activated platelets, during extracorporeal circulation of heparinized blood. These antagonists significantly suppressed but did not abolish P-selectin expression, annexin V binding, and microparticle formation. Anti-von Willebrand factor monoclonal antibody and aurin tricarboxylic acid (an inhibitor of glycoprotein Ib) had no effect on platelet activation during simulated cardiopulmonary bypass circulation. These data suggest that inhibition of fibrinogen binding glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex is partly effective in attenuating platelet activation in a heparinized cardiopulmonary bypass model circuit. The direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban prevented platelet loss and expression of P-selectin significantly more than did heparin. A combination of FK633 with argatroban as a substitute for heparin further prevented platelet loss and platelet secretion during simulated cardiopulmonary bypass circulation, although the inhibition of microparticle formation was less.

CONCLUSION

The inhibition of both platelet adhesion and thrombin may be effective to preserve platelet number and function during cardiopulmonary bypass circulation.

Pharmacotherapy of heparin- induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-and-limb threatening condition that is associated with the development of antibodies that activate platelets and the coagulation system in the presence of unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin. The binding of antibody to heparin-PF-4 complexes can activate platelets, leading to an acute, often catastrophic, thrombotic diathesis. The most common laboratory finding is the development of thrombocytopenia 5 or more days after beginning heparin treatment, which occur in up to 1 - 5% of patients exposed to heparin, depending on type of heparin and indication for anticoagulation. The onset of thrombocytopenia can be immediate or delayed for several weeks after the exposure to heparin. Approximately 50 - 60% of patients who develop HIT manifest acute venous or arterial thrombosis and a significant percentage of these patients die or develop vascular gangrene of a limb that requires amputation. Given the severe sequelae associated with HIT, recognition and immediate medical management is essential. Treatment of a patient with HIT is complex, as there are several different anticoagulants now available which have been shown to be useful. Optimal management depends on each patient's individual clinical manifestations, as well as the need for ongoing anticoagulation therapy. No single agent or treatment approach can be considered to be 'standard practice' as very few clinical trials have been completed, compare different treatment options. The use of warfarin alone in a patient with HIT, must be avoided in order to avoid the possibility of further activating coagulation, which may hasten the development of venous limb gangrene. There are several different tests available that detect HIT antibodies and each has different sensitivity and specificity for HIT. In this review we discuss the epidemiology and natural history of HIT, risk factors associated with the development of HIT and the clinical and laboratory tests that aid in the diagnosis and treatment. Special emphasis is given to addressing the management of HIT in special populations, particularly patients with renal or liver disease, acute coronary syndromes, pregnancy, paediatrics and patients who require cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Diagnosis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a major side effect secondary to the administration of heparin. This syndrome is serious and potentially life threatening. This response is the result of antibodies formed against the platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complex. The incidence of this immune-mediated syndrome has been estimated to be 1-3% of all patients receiving heparin therapy. The occurrence of HIT in patients requiring full anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), therefore, presents a serious challenge to the cardiac surgery team. The diagnosis of HIT should be based on both clinical and laboratory evidence. While functional assays, platelet aggregation tests, and the serotonin release assay can be used to support the diagnosis, the negative predictive value of these tests is generally less than 50%. In contrast, although non-functional antibody detection assays are more sensitive, they have a low specificity. HIT can be treated in several ways, including cessation of all heparin and giving an alternative thrombin inhibitor, platelet inhibition followed by heparin infusion, and the use of low molecular weight heparins. In this presentation, the pathology and current diagnostic tests, as well as the successful management of patients with HIT undergoing CPB at New York Presbyterian Hospital, are reviewed.

Heparin versus danaparoid in off-pump coronary bypass grafting: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is increasing, and the thrombin inhibitor danaparoid could be a useful alternative. The objective of the present study was to compare danaparoid and heparin in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing heparin (bolus of 1 mg/kg) with danaparoid (bolus of 40 U/kg), 71 patients underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with one of the study drugs. The amount of blood lost, the number of homologous blood products transfused, the troponin T levels, and the amount of anti-Xa activity were monitored.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients underwent 2.6 +/- 0.7 bypasses with danaparoid, and 37 patients underwent 2.5 +/- 0.9 grafts with heparin (P =.8). Postoperative blood losses averaged 1394 +/- 1033 mL in patients receiving danaparoid and 1130 +/- 868 mL in patients receiving heparin (P =.2). The number of homologous blood products transfused averaged 3.6 +/- 7 units in patients receiving danaparoid and 1.9 +/- 4.4 units in patients receiving heparin (P =.2). The number of patients requiring homologous blood transfusion was higher in patients receiving danaparoid (18/34 [53%]) than in patients receiving heparin (10/37 [27%], P =.03). Serum anti-Xa activity averaged 1.6 +/- 0.6 U/mL in patients receiving danaparoid and 1.9 +/- 0.8 U/mL in patients receiving heparin 30 minutes after injection of the drugs (P =.1) and 0.3 +/- 0.1 and 0.04 +/- 0.08 U/mL, respectively, 12 hours after coronary artery bypass grafting (P =.001). Troponin serum levels were similar 48 hours after coronary artery bypass grafting (0.5 +/- 0.6 and 0.4 +/- 0.6 microg/L, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with danaparoid versus heparin increases the number of patients exposed to homologous blood transfusion (relative risk, 2; 95% confidence limits, 1-4), off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with danaparoid is a valuable alternative to heparin in patients with thrombocytopenia requiring surgical intervention.

New Treatment Options for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin, in various forms, is used in a variety of conditions including prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Although the most common adverse effect related to the use of heparin is bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can also occur. Two types of HIT exist, HIT type I and type II. HIT type I is a mild and self-limiting disease in which the patient’s platelet count may decrease slightly but will recover with continued treatment. This is in contrast to HIT type II, which may lead to potentially devastating complications. Patients with HIT type II are at increased risk for thromboembolic complications that are mediated through autoimmune reactions and therefore require anticoagulation with danaparoid or one of the direct thrombin inhibitors, including lepirudin, argatroban, or bivalirudin. Limited data are available on the use of these agents in special populations including patients who are pregnant or those undergoing procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention, cardiopulmonary bypass and dialysis, and pregnancy. Future therapies may include the use of unfractionated heparin in combination with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Management of the patient with coagulation disorders

Understanding normal haemostasis and the pathophysiology of its disorders is essential for providing optimal care and ensuring judicious usage of blood products, as is keeping abreast of novel therapeutic modalities in a rapidly evolving field. The growing availability of synthetic coagulation factors has (at least in the western hemisphere) helped to reduce morbidity and therapeutic complications, while expanding the indications and usage of these agents. Promising advances in gene therapy may indeed introduce a sea change in the next decade or two.

Pharmacologic preservation of the hemostatic system during cardiac surgery

Bleeding after cardiac surgery remains a major potential problem. Numerous pharmacologic approaches to attenuating hemostatic system activation in cardiac surgery patients have been studied to further improve patient management. Therapeutic approaches studied include inhibiting thrombin generation or activation, preserving platelet function, and decreasing the need for transfusion of allogeneic blood products. Pharmacologic approaches to reduce bleeding and transfusion requirements in cardiac surgery patients are based on either preventing or reversing the defects associated with the CPB-induced coagulopathy. The increasing use of platelet inhibitors (clopidogrel and IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists) and new anticoagulants (low-molecular weight heparins, pentasaccharide, recombinant hirudin, bivalirudin, and argatroban) also pose interesting problems in managing cardiac surgery patients. Aprotinin and lysine analogues (epsilon-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid) have become mainstay therapeutic agents to prevent bleeding and the potential need for allogeneic transfusion. Newer therapies that are important to consider include the potential of recombinant activated factor VIIa as a therapy for refractory bleeding after cardiac surgery.

Alternatives to unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation in cardiopulmonary bypass

Despite the progress made in the development of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) equipment, systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin and post-bypass neutralization with protamine are still used in most perfusion procedures. However, there are a number of situations where unfractionated heparin, protamine or both cannot be used for various reasons. Intolerance of protamine can be addressed with extracorporeal heparin removal devices, perfusion with (no) low systemic heparinization and, to some degree, by perfusion with alternative anticoagulants. Various alternative anticoagulation regimens have been used in cases of intolerance to unfractionated heparin, including extreme hemodilution, low molecular weight heparins, danaparoid, ancrod, r-hirudin, abciximab, tirofiban, argatroban and others. In the presence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thrombosis, the use of r-hirudin appears to be an acceptable solution which has been well studied. The main issue with r-hirudin is the difficulty in monitoring its activity during CPB, despite the fact that ecarin coagulation time assessment is now available. A more recent approach is based on selective blockage of platelet aggregation by means of monoclonal antibodies directed to GPIIb/IIIa receptors (abciximab) or the use of a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor (tirofiban). An 80% blockage of the GPIIb/IIIa receptors and suppression of platelet aggregation to less than 20% allows the giving of unfractionated heparin and running CPB in a standard fashion despite HIT and thrombosis. Likewise, at the end of the procedure, unfractionated heparin is neutralized with protamine as usual and donor platelets are transfused if necessary. GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors are frequently used in interventional cardiology and, therefore, are available in most hospitals.

Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia

Treatment with heparin is associated with two types of thrombocytopenia. The most worrisome of these is the immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT type II). Suspicion of HIT type II mandates immediate cessation of heparin administration and consideration of an alternative anticoagulation therapy. Hirudin and argatroban are approved alternative anticoagulants with no cross-reactivity with the HIT antibody. HIT type II is a clinicopathologic syndrome, and therefore diagnosis requires clinical and laboratory confirmation. The laboratory evaluation for HIT type II should also determine whether or not there is HIT-antibody cross-reactivity with danaparoid and low molecular weight heparin. Patients with HIT type II who require coronary artery bypass graft surgery present a particularly difficult situation, as there is no ideal alternative to heparin anticoagulation.