Neurologic complications of the Novacor left ventricular assist device

How Are We Monitoring Brain Injuries in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device? A Systematic Review of Literature

Despite the common occurrence of brain injury in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD), optimal neuromonitoring methods are unknown. A systematic review of PubMed and six electronic databases from inception was conducted until June 5, 2019. Studies reporting methods of neuromonitoring while on LVAD were extracted. Of 5,190 records screened, 37 studies met the inclusion criteria. The neuromonitoring methods include Transcranial Doppler ultrasound for emboli monitoring (TCD-e) (n = 13) and cerebral autoregulation (n = 3), computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (n = 9), serum biomarkers (n = 7), carotid ultrasound (n = 3), and near-infrared spectroscopy (n = 2). Of 421 patients with TCD-e, thromboembolic events (TEs) were reported in 79 patients (20%) and microembolic signals (MES) were detected in 105 patients (27%). Ischemic stroke was more prevalent in patients with MES compared to patients without MES (43% vs.13%, p < 0.001). Carotid ultrasound for assessing carotid stenosis was unreliable after LVAD implantation. Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were associated with TEs. Significant heterogeneity exists in timing, frequency, and types of neuromonitoring tools. TCD-e and serial LDH levels appeared to have potential for assessing the risk of ischemic stroke. Future prospective research incorporating protocolized TCD-e and LDH may assist in monitoring adverse events in patients with LVAD.

Delirium in Cardiac and Cardiovascular Surgical Intensive Care Units

Delirium is a common occurrence in cardiac and cardiovascular surgical intensive care units. Due to multiple confounding factors, this diagnosis remains challenging for medical professionals. Multiple theories exist regarding the pathophysiology of delirium, which include disruption of neurotransmitters as well as inflammation. Delirium has been associated with prolonged hospitalizations and an increase in mortality. Although there are widely used screening tools for delirium, none have been validated in this particular patient population. Limited treatments exist for delirium, so: both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic preventative measures should be employed in this patient population.

Cardiorespiratory Fitness Mediates Cognitive Performance in Chronic Heart Failure Patients and Heart Transplant Recipients

We compared cognitive profiles in chronic heart failure patients (HF), heart transplant recipients (HT) and healthy controls (HC) and examined the relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness (V˙O_2peak), peak cardiac output (CO_peak) and cognitive performance. Stable HT patients (n = 11), HF patients (n = 11) and HC (n = 13) (61.5 ± 8.5 years) were recruited. Four cognitive composite scores targeting different cognitive functions were computed from neuropsychological tests: working memory, processing speed, executive functions and verbal memory. Processing speed and executive function scores were higher, which indicates lower performances in HF and HT compared to HC (p < 0.05). V˙O_2peak and first ventilatory threshold (VT₁) were lower in HF and HT vs. HC (p < 0.01). CO_peak was lower in HF vs. HT and HC (p < 0.01). Processing speed, executive function and verbal memory performances were correlated with V˙O_2peak, VT₁ and peak cardiac hemodynamics (p < 0.05). Mediation analyses showed that V˙O_2peak and VT₁ mediated the relationship between group and processing speed and executive function performances in HF and HT. CO_peak fully mediated executive function and processing speed performances in HF only. V˙O_2peak and CO_peak were related to cognitive performance in the entire sample. In addition, V˙O_2peak and VT₁ fully mediated the relationship between group and executive function and processing speed performances.

Anticoagulation Control in Patients With Ventricular Assist Devices

Anticoagulation control has been associated with risk of thromboembolism and hemorrhage. Herein, we explore the relationship between anticoagulation control achieved in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients and evaluate the association with risk of thromboembolism and hemorrhage. Patients (19 years old or older) with a continuous flow LVAD placed from 2006 to 2012. Percent time spent in target range (PTTR) for international normalized ratio (INR) was estimated with target range of 2.0-3.0. Proportion of time spent in target range was categorized into PTTR > 60%, PTTR ≥ 50 < 60%, and PTTR < 50%. The relationship between PTTR and thromboembolism and hemorrhage was assessed. One hundred fifteen participants contributed 624.5 months of follow-up time. Only 20% of patients achieved anticoagulation control (PTTR > 60% for INR range of 2-3). After adjusting for chronic kidney disease, history of diabetes, history of atrial fibrillation, and age at implant, compared with patients with PTTR < 50%, the relative risk of thromboembolism in patients with PTTR ≥ 60% (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14-0.96; p = 0.042) was significantly lower, but not for patients with a PTTR of ≥ 50 < 60% (HR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.02-1.82; p = 0.16). The relative risk for hemorrhage was also significantly lower among patients with a PTTR ≥ 60% (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.21-0.98; p = 0.045), but not among those with PTTR of ≥ 50 < 60% (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.14-1.56; p = 0.22). This current study demonstrates that LVAD patients remain in the INR target range an average of 42.9% of the time. To our knowledge, this is the first report with regard to anticoagulation control as assessed by PTTR and its association with thromboembolism, hemorrhage, or death among patients with ventricular assist devices (VADs).

Neurologic Complications in the Intensive Care Unit

Complications involving the central and peripheral nervous system are frequently encountered in critically ill patients. All components of the neuraxis can be involved including the brain, spinal cord, peripheral nerves, neuromuscular junction, and muscles. Neurologic complications adversely impact outcome and length of stay. These complications can be related to underlying critical illness, pre-existing comorbid conditions, and commonly used and life-saving procedures and medications. Familiarity with the myriad neurologic complications that occur in the intensive care unit can facilitate their timely recognition and treatment. Additionally, awareness of treatment-related neurologic complications may inform decision-making, mitigate risk, and improve outcomes.

The hemodynamic effects of the LVAD outflow cannula location on the thrombi distribution in the aorta: A primary numerical study

Although a growing number of patients undergo LVAD implantation for heart failure treatment, thrombi are still the devastating complication for patients who used LVAD. LVAD outflow cannula location and thrombi generation sources were hypothesized to affect the thrombi distribution in the aorta. To test this hypothesis, numerical studies were conducted by using computational fluid dynamic (CFD) theory. Two anastomotic configurations, in which the LVAD outflow cannula is anastomosed to the anterior and lateral ascending aortic wall (named as anterior configurations and lateral configurations, respectively), are designed. The particles, whose sized are same as those of thrombi, are released at the LVAD output cannula and the aortic valve (named as thrombiP and thrombiL, respectively) to calculate the distribution of thrombi. The simulation results demonstrate that the thrombi distribution in the aorta is significantly affected by the LVAD outflow cannula location. In anterior configuration, the thrombi probability of entering into the three branches is 23.60%, while that in lateral configuration is 36.68%. Similarly, in anterior configuration, the thrombi probabilities of entering into brachiocephalic artery, left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery, is 8.51%, 9.64%, 5.45%, respectively, while that in lateral configuration it is 11.39%, 3.09%, 22.20% respectively. Moreover, the origins of thrombi could affect their distributions in the aorta. In anterior configuration, the thrombiP has a lower probability to enter into the three branches than thrombiL (12% vs. 25%). In contrast, in lateral configuration, the thrombiP has a higher probability to enter into the three branches than thrombiL (47% vs. 35%). In brief, the LVAD outflow cannula location significantly affects the distribution of thrombi in the aorta. Thus, in the clinical practice, the selection of outflow location of LVAD and the risk of thrombi formed in the left ventricle should be paid more attention than before.

Neurologic aspects of cardiac emergencies

In this review, cardiac arrest is discussed, with a focus on neuroprognostication and the emerging data, with regard to identifying more accurate predictors of neurologic outcomes in the era of therapeutic hypothermia. Topics discussed include recent controversies with regard to targeted temperature management in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest; neurologic complications associated with surgical disease and procedures, namely aortic dissection, infective endocarditis, left ventricular assist devices, and coronary artery bypass grafting; and the cause, pathogenesis, and management of neurogenic stunned myocardium.

Neurologic complications of cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology

A wide array of neurologic complications can occur in relation to cardiac surgical procedures, most of which are transient and do not result in permanent sequelae. Specific neurologic insults can occur depending on the type of cardiac procedure and are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Neurologists practicing in the hospital setting as well as outpatient neurologists should be familiar with the cardiac surgical procedures currently available. Prompt identification of neurologic deficits is important in order to plan an appropriate systematic evaluation and initiate possible treatments in a timely manner. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of all facets of neurologic complications after cardiac surgical procedures.

Ventricular assist devices: is destination therapy a viable alternative in the non-transplant candidate?

The topic of this article, stated a more familiar way, is whether left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are ready for 'Primetime' as a therapeutic option in and of themselves. In order to provide an update and insight on this question, we briefly review from where the field has come, and in more detail describe its current state and where we are heading. We believe the short answer to this question is 'Yes', but like many things, a short answer is not adequate. Here we attempt to deliver a more comprehensive answer, providing some historical context, outlining the great achievements that have been made, as well as the many challenges that still remain before LVADs become a truly mainstream therapy.

Cerebrovascular complications of left ventricular assist devices

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly being used as a bridge to heart transplantation or destination therapy. It is unclear which antithrombotic regimen should be used to reduce the risk of stroke. We systematically reviewed the literature on all types of antithrombotic regimens and stroke in patients with any type of LVADs. Our primary outcome measure was the mean incidence of any type of stroke. Twenty-six articles were selected as relevant, comprehending 1989 patients with a mean LVAD support of 200 days (range 30-621). The mean proportion of patients affected with stroke was 20% (range 0-55%), with a mean incidence of 0.74 (range 0-6.91) events/patient-year. Support with HeartMate II and a regimen of postoperative heparin converted to coumarins, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and dipyridamole resulted in 0.17 (mean; range 0.06-0.29) strokes/patient-year. HeartMate II support and the same regime without heparin was associated with 0.07 (mean; range 0.03-0.11) strokes/patient-year. A Novacor device with heparin, converted to coumarins, was associated with 3.82 (mean; range 1.03-6.91) strokes/patient-year, while ASA added to this regime resulted in 0.97 ischaemic strokes/patient-year (mean; range 0.53-1.48). Other combinations of assist devices and antithrombotic regimes were investigated in one or two studies only. This systematic review provides risk estimates for stroke for various LVADs and antithrombotic regimes. Our findings indicate that the postoperative use of heparin in HeartMate II patients is doubtful, and suggest an important role for antiplatelet drugs to prevent stroke in patients supported with a Novacor device.

Implementation of a comprehensive interdisciplinary care coordination of infants and young children on Berlin Heart ventricular assist devices

BACKGROUND

Young children supported on a ventricular assist device (VAD) can have prolonged hospitalizations awaiting heart transplantation. The adult VAD literature demonstrates that comprehensive programs optimize transplantation outcomes. The goal of this intervention was to create an interdisciplinary program to optimize care coordination and delivery in young children requiring a VAD.

METHOD

This study was a case review.

RESULTS

We have supported 8 infants and young children with Berlin Heart VAD. These children's hospitalizations have been more complex than those of our older VAD patients, and they have required intensive care for prolonged periods. An interdisciplinary group evaluated our practices and identified areas for potential improvement. The focus group from our intensive care unit introduced multiple interventions to optimize interdisciplinary care coordination and consistency of practice. These included (1) interdisciplinary care guidelines for chronically, critically ill patients; (2) institution of a primary cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) physician and nurse practitioner system; (3) introduction of a psychological intervention for families to minimize the impact of their extended CVICU stay; (4) implementation of early jejunal feeds; (5) a focused developmental and rehabilitation protocol, 6) implementation of a structured approach to minimizing blood transfusions; (7) increased structure for our interdisciplinary rounds to optimize team communication; (8) comprehensive nursing education including wound care, anticoagulation management, and laboratory draws; and (9) a protocol for off-unit rehabilitative/developmental interventions. These changes in both practice and approach for young VAD patients have also been of benefit to other chronically, critically ill children in the CVICU, as well as to our CVICU team.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive interdisciplinary care coordination and standardized practice can be achieved in the critical care setting for complex pediatric heart failure patients who require long-term VAD support.

Incidence and patterns of adverse event onset during the first 60 days after ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

Although ventricular assist devices (VADs) provide effective treatment for end-stage heart failure, VAD support remains associated with significant risk for adverse events (AEs). To date there has been no detailed assessment of the incidence of a full range of AEs using standardized event definitions. We sought to characterize the frequency and timing of AE onset during the first 60 days of VAD support, a period during which clinical observation suggests the risk of incident AEs is high.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed utilizing prospectively collected data from a single-site clinical database including 195 patients aged 18 or greater receiving VADs between 1996 and 2006. Adverse events were coded using standardized criteria. Cumulative incidence rates were determined, controlling for competing risks (death, transplantation, recovery-wean).

RESULTS

During the first 60 days after implantation, the most common AEs were bleeding, infection, and arrhythmias (cumulative incidence rates, 36% to 48%), followed by tamponade, respiratory events, reoperations, and neurologic events (24% to 31%). Other events (eg, hemolysis, renal, hepatic events) were less common (rates <15%). Some events (eg, bleeding, arrhythmias) showed steep onset rates early after implantation. Others (eg, infections, neurologic events) had gradual onsets during the 60-day period. Incidence of most events did not vary by implant era (1996 to 2000 vs 2001 to 2006) or by left ventricular versus biventricular support.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding differential temporal patterns of AE onset will allow preventive strategies to be targeted to the time periods when specific AE risks are greatest. The AE incidence rates provide benchmarks against which future studies of VAD-related risks may be compared.

Cerebrovascular accidents in patients with a ventricular assist device

OBJECTIVE

A cerebrovascular accident is a devastating adverse event in a patient with a ventricular assist device. The goal was to clarify the risk factors for cerebrovascular accident.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data, including medical history, ventricular assist device type, white blood cell count, thrombelastogram, and infection, were reviewed retrospectively in 124 patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (25%) had 48 cerebrovascular accidents. The mean ventricular assist device support period was 228 and 89 days in patients with and without cerebrovascular accidents, respectively (P < .0001). Sixty-six percent of cerebrovascular accidents occurred within 4 months after implantation. Actuarial freedom from cerebrovascular accident at 6 months was 75%, 64%, 63%, and 33% with the HeartMate device (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, Calif), Thoratec biventricular ventricular assist device (Thoratec Corp), Thoratec left ventricular assist device (Thoratec), and Novacor device (WorldHeart, Oakland, Calif), respectively. Twenty cerebrovascular accidents (42%) occurred in patients with infections. The mean white blood cell count at the cerebrovascular accident was greater than the normal range in patients with infection (12,900/mm3) and without infection (9500/mm3). The mean maximum amplitude of the thrombelastogram in the presence of infection (63.6 mm) was higher than that in the absence of infection (60.7 mm) (P = .0309).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of cerebrovascular accident increases with a longer ventricular assist device support period. Infection may activate platelet function and predispose the patient to a cerebrovascular accident. An elevation of the white blood cell count may also exacerbate the risk of cerebrovascular accident even in patients without infection. Selection of device type, prevention of infection, and meticulous control of anticoagulation are key to preventing cerebrovascular accident.

Neurologic Events With a Totally Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Device: European LionHeart Clinical Utility Baseline Study (CUBS)

BACKGROUND

Neurologic events such as thromboembolic and hemorrhagic strokes are common complications of mechanical circulatory support. We report the neurologic events observed in patients treated for end-stage heart failure with the implantable, pulsatile LionHeart left ventricular assist device (LVAD). This sub-study was part of the LionHeart European Clinical Utility Baseline Study (CUBS).

METHODS

Twenty-three male patients were implanted with the LionHeart LVAD in a non-randomized, observational study. Neurologic events were classified into three categories: (1) transient ischemic attacks (TIAs); (2) strokes, including cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) and intracranial bleeding (ICB); and (3) "other," including hypoperfusion, coma and brain death. Neurologic injuries were also categorized as transient/reversible or permanent/disabling.

RESULTS

Thirteen of 23 patients (57%) had a total of 30 neurologic events. Eight patients (35%) had 18 TIAs. Eight patients (35%) also had a stroke, either CVA (n = 5, 22%) or ICB (n = 3, 13%), and 5 of these patients (22%) also had 12 TIAs. Three patients (13%) had 4 "other" neurologic events. Ten patients (43%) had transient/reversible neurologic deficits and 10 (43%) had permanent/disabling events. One patient (4%) had intracranial bleeding as a primary cause of death (anti-coagulation-related hemorrhage). The combined incidence of neurologic events was 1.37 events/patient-year. The incidences of transient and permanent events were 0.91 and 0.46 event/patient-year, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurologic events caused morbidity in the CUBS trial, with infrequent mortality. These results are similar to previous experiences with destination therapy and underscore the need for improvements in LVAD design, patient selection and patient management to reduce the incidence of neurologic events.

Comparison of Novacor and HeartMate Vented Electric Left Ventricular Assist Devices in a Single Institution

We compared the survival outcomes, left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-related hospitalization, stroke, infection, panel reactive antibody, and blood product use data among 13 Novacor and 51 HeartMate system recipients. Stroke was significantly higher in Novacor patients, as was blood product use at the time of heart transplantation, likely due to long-term anti-coagulation, while the LVAD-related hospitalization and infections did not differ between the 2 groups. A positive panel reactive antibody was seen more among the HeartMate patients, but did not have a significant clinical impact and may not represent a true allosensitization.

Left ventricular assist devices: evolving devices and indications for use in ischemic heart disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The mortality with end-stage heart failure is extremely high, especially when patients become refractory to conventional medical therapy and require frequent hospitalization. Ischemic heart disease remains the primary cause of advanced heart failure. Mechanical pumps or devices have been developed called ventricular assist devices and are being used to support an increasing number of patients with refractory heart failure.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of ventricular assist devices has evolved from initially only support of patients unable to be weaned from a heart-lung machine after cardiac surgery to use now as a bridge to a heart transplant, including patients with acute myocardial infarction and shock and severe pulmonary hypertension. More recently, they have been proven as a definitive alternative for patients not eligible for heart transplantation. There are new devices being examined in clinical trials, including a change from pusher-plate to devices with axial flow technology that are much smaller and easier to implant. Outcomes with their use are improving rapidly as the devices become more reliable and more is learned about the importance of candidate selection.

SUMMARY

This review describes current indications for the use of these devices, the types of pumps now available, criteria for initiating ventricular assist device support, complications of their use, and new applications such as a platform for stem cell therapy for treatment of end-stage heart failure.

Neurological Events During Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support for Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Progression of heart failure can lead to cardiac transplantation, but when patients are ineligible, long-term mechanical circulatory support may improve survival. The REMATCH trial showed that left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) prolonged survival in patients with end-stage disease, but with a significant number of adverse events. We report on the neurological outcomes in the REMATCH trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined new neurological events in the 129 patients randomized to either LVAD placement (n=68) or medical management (n=61), classified as stroke, transient ischemic attack, toxic-metabolic encephalopathy, and other. There were 46 neurological events: 42 in 30 LVAD patients and 4 in 4 patients in the medical arm (chi2, 30/68 versus 4/61, P<0.001). Sixteen percent of the LVAD patients had a stroke, with a rate of 0.19 per year (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.33), many occurring in the postoperative period. The stroke rate in the medical arm was 0.052. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a 44% reduction in the risk of stroke or death in the LVAD group versus the optimal medical group (P=0.002). The mean interval from implantation to stroke was 221.8 days (+/-70.4 days). History of stroke, age, and sepsis were not stroke risk factors in the LVAD group.

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer than half of the patients in the LVAD group had a neurological event, and there were few neurological deaths. Survival analysis combining stroke or death demonstrated a significant benefit for long-term circulatory support with an LVAD over medical therapy. Future trials will need to address prospectively all neurological outcomes, including neurocognitive function, and the role of long-term neuroprotection.

Recent improvements in outcome with the Novacor left ventricular assist device

BACKGROUND

The Novacor implantable, electrically powered, wearable, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been used as a bridge to transplantation at our institution since 1994. Recent changes in protocol have resulted in a decreased incidence of infections, thromboembolism, and mortality.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of all 43 patients who received implantable LVADs at the Mount Sinai Medical Center. After 1998, a number of protocol modifications were instituted. Vascular grafts were changed from a low-porosity, woven polyester (Cooley) to a gelatin-sealed, knitted polyester graft (Vascutek), the devices were implanted pre-peritoneally rather than in the posterior rectus sheath, and extensive drainage of the chest and pre-peritoneal pocket was used. The following anti-coagulation regimen was used: low-molecular-weight Dextran for 1 day, initiated after chest tube drainage <50 cc/hour; then IV heparin for 10 to 14 days, beginning at 500 U/hour, slowly increasing partial thromboplastin time to 1.5 to 2 x control; and finally Coumadin, maintaining the international normalized ratio at 2.5 to 3.5. Daily aspirin, 325 mg, was begun on post-operative Day 7. We compared 22 patients who electively underwent surgery before the changes, Group I, with 18 patients treated thereafter, Group II.

RESULTS

Groups I and II were well matched with regard to age (47 vs 44 years); cause of heart failure (idiopathic, 50% vs 44%; ischemic, 50% vs 56%), and duration of support (79 vs 76 days). The incidence of thromboembolic cerebrovascular events was significantly less in Group II (6%) than in Group I (23%), p = 0.025. The incidence of bleeding increased mildly in Group I. Pocket infections occurred in 27% of Group I patients vs 11% of Group II patients, p = 0.018. Only 2 patients (11%) in Group II died while receiving device support, vs 7 (32%) in Group I, p = 0.019.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that pre-peritoneal implantation, use of a new generation of vascular grafts, extensive drainage, and a more restricted anti-coagulation regimen improve outcome after Novacor LVAD implantation for advanced heart failure.

Patient selection for assist devices: bridge to transplant

Patients in severely progressed states of heart failure can be bridged to successful heart transplantation with mechanical assist devices. Experience has demonstrated that patient selection and timing of device implantation are crucial for obtaining acceptable results when using this expensive technology. The degree of irreversible secondary organ dysfunction before re-establishing adequate cardiac output determines the chance of reaching transplantation. Patients who recover during support from all sequelae of end stage heart failure have an excellent outcome after heart transplantation.