Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: the Tata Memorial Hospital experience

Rare malignant neoplasm of the esophagus: current status and future perspectives

Esophageal cancer is common worldwide, including in Japan, and its major histological subtype is squamous cell carcinoma. However, there are some rare esophageal cancers, including neuroendocrine neoplasm, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, carcinosarcoma and malignant melanoma. The biological and clinical features of these cancers differ from those of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, different treatment strategies are needed for these cancers but are based on limited evidence. Neuroendocrine neoplasm is mainly divided into neuroendocrine tumor and neuroendocrine carcinoma by differentiation and the Ki-67 proliferation index or mitotic index. Epidemiologically, the majority of esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms are neuroendocrine carcinoma. The treatment of neuroendocrine carcinoma is similar to that of small cell lung cancer, which has similar morphological and biological features. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor is known to be associated with alterations in the c-KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor genes and, if resectable, is treated in accordance with the modified Fletcher classification. Carcinosarcoma is generally resistant to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy and requires multimodal treatments such as surgery plus chemotherapy to achieve cure. Primary malignant melanoma is resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy, but immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently demonstrated efficacy for malignant melanoma of the esophagus. This review focuses on the current status and future perspectives for rare cancer of the esophagus.

Limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus treated with curative esophagectomy: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of surgery in the treatment of small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) and explore potential prognostic factors.

METHODS

We screened patients with SCCE who underwent esophagectomy from 2010 to 2018 at three institutes. Differences in survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients were included. Multivariate analysis showed that TNM stage (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.57-10.75, p = 0.004) and adjuvant therapy (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.16-0.51, p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. Stage I, stage IIA, and stage IIB disease were merged into the surgery response disease (SRD), whereas stage III disease into the surgery nonresponse disease (SNRD). The SRD group had significantly improved survival compared to the SNRD group (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.19-0.58, p < 0.001). In addition, adjuvant therapy increased survival benefit in the SNRD group (p < 0.001) but not in the SRD group (p = 0.061).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery alone appears to be adequate for disease control in the SRD group, whereas multimodality therapy was associated with improved survival in the SNRD group.

Antiangiogenesis Combined with Immunotherapy to Treat Advanced Small-Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus Resistant to Chemotherapy: According to the Guidance of Next-Generation Sequencing

A 64-year-old woman admitted to our hospital with the chief complaint of swallowing obstruction was diagnosed as relapsed small-cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Complete remission (CR) was observed after six cycles of irinotecan plus cisplatin therapy. According to the results of a next-generation sequencing analysis of the tumor specimen, anlotinib (12 mg PO q3w) was recommended. After 1 month of anlotinib treatment, the tumor decreased significantly according to computed tomography scan and gastroscopy. However, the disease progressed after 2 months of therapy. A gene analysis of the new puncture sample showed microsatellite instability and a high tumor mutation burden. Immunohistochemistry indicated positive programmed death ligand-1 expression (>1%). Because of these results, the patient was treated with anlotinib (12 mg PO q3w) in combination with toripalimab (240 mg IV drip q3w). After 3 months of therapy, CR was achieved, although progression-free survival had not been reached at the time of publication.

Population-based analysis of small cell carcinoma of the esophagus using the SEER database

Background

Small cell cancer (SmCC) of the esophagus is a rare malignancy with an aggressive behavior associated with poor survival. The present study aims to determine the clinicopathological characteristics, therapeutic and prognosis.

Methods

Patients with SmCC of the esophagus, diagnosed from 1975 to 2016, were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The clinicopathological characteristics were described and the prognostic factors were further determined using Cox regression analysis.

Results

The median overall survival (mOS) of all 515 patients with SmCC of the esophagus was 7.0 months, and the 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 31.5%, 14.7%, 6.00%, respectively. Patients with chemoradiotherapy (mOS: 12.0 months) had better prognosis than those receiving surgery alone (mOS: 12.0 vs. 4.0 months). The patients receiving surgery combined with chemoradiotherapy had longest survival time (mOS: 19.0 months), followed by patients receiving surgery combined with chemotherapy (14.0 months). The multivariate Cox survival analysis demonstrated that older age, distant metastases were independent prognostic factors. The use of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy were independent favorable prognostic factors (P<0.05 for all).

Conclusions

SmCC of the esophagus is uncommon, older age and distant metastases were independently associated with poor survival. Chemotherapy could provide significant clinical benefit for those patients, especially chemoradiotherapy and surgery combined with chemotherapy.

A retrospective study of definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment for resectable small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus (SCNEC-E) remains to be established.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 7 consecutive patients with resectable SCNEC-E who received definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) to evaluate the safety and efficacy. Treatment consisted of two courses of chemotherapy with cisplatin (80 mg/m² on day 1) and etoposide (100 mg/m² on days 1-3) or carboplatin (AUC 5 on day 1) and etoposide (80 mg/m² on days 1-3) given every 4 weeks during dCRT. The total radiation dose was 50.4 Gy (28 fractions).

RESULTS

The clinical stage was IA in 1 patient, IB in 2 patients, IIA in 3 patients, and IIB in 1 patient. Definitive CRT was completed in all patients. The median overall treatment time of radiotherapy was 44 days. The chemotherapy regimen included in dCRT was cisplatin and etoposide in 3 patients and carboplatin and etoposide in 4 patients. Acute adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were neutropenia 100%, thrombocytopenia 43%, febrile neutropenia 43%, and nausea 14%. There were no late grade 3 or 4 adverse events. The median survival time was 32 months. The complete response rate was 100%. The recurrence rate was 43%. The median survival of the 4 patients without recurrence was 56 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive CRT with cisplatin and etoposide or carboplatin and etoposide is a feasible treatment for the resectable SCNEC-E, and long-term survival can be achieved in some patients.

ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio as a Novel Prognostic Predictor in Patients With Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus

Background and Aim: Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a rarely aggressive disease characterized by rapid progression, widespread metastasis, and poor prognosis. This study was aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of serum lipids for overall survival (OS) in SCCE patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed SCCE patients in a training cohort (61 patients) and validated them in a validation cohort (27 patients). These cases were collected from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2006 to 2017. Univariate and multivariate Cox survival analyses were performed to determine serum lipids as prognostic factors associated with the patient's OS. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were used to compare predictive power of independent prognostic factors. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the prognostic factors were measured by the concordance index (C-index) and decision curve, and were compared with the TNM stage system. Results: On multivariate analysis of the training cohort, independent factors for survival were gender, BAR (ApoB/ApoA-1) and TNM stage. The area under the curve (AUC) of BAR+TNM stage in the training cohort was higher than that of TNM stage for OS, and similar result was observed in the validation cohort. The c-index of BAR+TNM stage for predicting the OS was 0.655 (95% CI = 0.571-0.740), which was higher than that of TNM stage [0.614 (95% CI = 0.530-0.698)] in the training cohort. In the validation cohort, the C-index of the BAR+TNM stage for predicting OS was also higher than that of the TNM stage [0.688 (95% CI: 0.570~0.806) vs. (0.512; 95% CI: 0.392~0.632)]. In addition, decision curve analysis also showed that the predictive accuracy of BAR+TNM stage for OS was higher than TNM stage both in the training and the validation cohorts. Conclusions: BAR represents a promising prognostic indicator that might complement TNM stage in the prognosis of SCCE, and that warrant further assessment in large SCCE patient cohort.

A rare rarity: Neuroendocrine tumor of the esophagus

Esophageal Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, aggressive and lacking specific symptoms. This causes a diagnostic delay, worsening the prognosis. Numerous cases are reported in literature, without a consensus on the management. Our aim was to clarify epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic, therapeutic management of esophageal NETs. Extensive literature search identified a total of 226 articles. One hundred twenty-five articles (n = 1676) met the inclusion criteria, showing that: the incidence of esophageal NET varies geographically; men (60-70 years) are more affected; smoking and alcohol abuse are the major risk factors; dysphagia, weight loss, appetite loss are the most common clinical features. The histotypes include high-grade small and large cell esophageal carcinomas and low-grade carcinoid tumors. Mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms are the most common. Often the diagnosis occurs randomly on endoscopic examination. Circulating markers, functional combined with conventional imaging contributes to the diagnosis and management. Treatment depends on type, grade and stage of the tumor.

A comparative analysis of clinicopathological factors between esophageal small cell and basaloid squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal small cell carcinoma (E-SmCC) and basaloid squamous cell carcinomas (BSCCs) are both highly aggressive malignancies, but their detailed differences in clinical behaviors have remained virtually unknown. In addition, treatment strategies of the patients with E-SmCC have not been established. 29 cases of E-SmCC and 39 with BSCC were examined in this study to clarify the clinical features and outcome of the patients with E-SmCC and to compare the findings with those of BSCC. E-SmCCs presented a more advanced status than BSCC (TNM Stage: P = .002). Esophagectomy was performed in 15 small cell carcinoma patients and 14 were treated with non-surgical/systemic therapy. The clinical outcome of the small cell carcinoma cases was significantly worse than those with BSCC (P = .001), but results of a stage-stratified analysis revealed that the Stage I small cell carcinoma patients presented favorable prognosis (3-year survival rate 100%, n = 4). In contrast, among those with Stage II-IV, clinical outcome tended to be better in the systemic therapy group (3-year survival rate 49%, n = 13) than the surgically treated group (3-year survival rate 0%, n = 12). E-SmCC was a more aggressive neoplasm than BSCC. However, early detection could possibly improve the clinical outcome of patients with E-SmCC. Systemic therapy could also benefit the patients with advanced disease (Stage II-IV).

Prognostic value of immunohistochemical factors in esophageal small cell carcinoma (ESCC): analysis of clinicopathologic features of 73 patients

Background

Esophageal small cell carcinoma (ESCC) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. This study sought to describe immunohistochemical (IHC) and clinicopathological features of patients with ESCC, and to clarify how the utilization of different marker combination affects prognostic outcome.

Methods

The paraffin-embedded ESCC samples of 73 patients were immunohistochemically analyzed of neuron specific enolase (NSE), chromogranin A (CgA), synaptophysin (Syn) and thyroid transcriptional factor-1 (TTF-1). The positivity of these factors and their correlation with clinical characteristics was described. The relation between positive expression of them and survival was also analyzed.

Results

Immunological reactivity of the samples was Syn 68.5%, TTF-1 49.3%, NSE 90.4%, CgA 43.8%. There were 18 patients with 4 biomarkers positive (24.7%), 24 patients with 3 biomarkers positive (32.9%), 14 patients with 2 biomarkers positive (19.2%) and 12 patients with only 1 biomarker positive (16.4%). Five cases (6.8%) were all negative. The 2- and 3-year survivals were 24.8% and 19.9%, respectively. The mOS of patients without expression of four factors was significant worse than those with at least one factor of positive expression (6.1 vs. 15.3 months, P=0.002).

Conclusions

Patients with ESCC have a poor prognosis. The positive labeling of Syn, CgA, NSE and TTF-1 implicated their favourable prognostic value trend. These factors or their combination might serve as useful markers in prognostic evaluation.

Small Cell/Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Esophagus: Presentation of Two Cases and Review of the Literature

Small cell cancers of the gastrointestinal tract are part of a family of extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas. These tumors can occur anywhere in the body and generally carry a poor prognosis. Treatment usually consists of a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. We present two cases illustrating diagnostic and treatment issues and review the literature on the treatment of this uncommon but aggressive family of tumors. Free full text available at www.tumorionline.it

Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of Limited-Stage Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus

INTRODUCTION

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCCE) is characterized by high malignancy, early metastasis, and poor prognosis. This retrospective study aimed to review the clinical characteristics of patients with limited-stage PSCCE and determine the relevant prognostic factors and optimal treatment strategies.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 152 consecutive patients with limited-stage PSCCE between January 2007 and December 2015. Prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate analysis and a Cox regression model. Subgroup analysis was applied to evaluate the effect of treatment strategy on survival.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that treatment modality (p = 0.034) and N stage (p = 0.002) were independent prognostic factors. Patients with stage I or IIA PSCCE who underwent an operation alone exhibited better survival than those who did not undergo an operation (median survival time 29 versus 17.4 months [p = 0.031]), and postoperative adjuvant therapy did not increase overall survival or disease-free survival (p > 0.05). The overall survival rate of patients with stage III PSCCE who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) was significantly better than that of patients who underwent an operation alone or did not undergo an operation (p = 0.021 and p = 0.026, respectively); additionally, nCT could increase disease-free survival (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment modalities and N stage are independent prognostic factors. Radical esophagectomy should be considered as the primary treatment for stage I or IIA PSCCE, and nCT followed by esophagectomy could be an effective treatment option for stage III PSCCE. Multicenter randomized studies are required to confirm the role of nCT in the management of limited-stage PSCCE.

SOX2 and Rb1 in esophageal small-cell carcinoma: their possible involvement in pathogenesis

Clinicopathological features and pathogenesis of esophageal small-cell carcinoma remain unclear. We hypothesized common cellular origin and pathogenesis in small-cell carcinoma of esophagus and lung associated with SOX2 overexpression and loss of Rb1. Expression of squamous-basal markers (CK5/6 and p40), glandular markers (CK18 and CEA), SOX2, and Rb1 were evaluated in 15 esophageal small-cell carcinomas, 46 poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinomas, and 88 small-cell lung carcinoma, as well as 16 embryonic esophagus. Esophageal small-cell carcinoma expressed higher levels of glandular markers and lower levels of squamous-basal markers than poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. No significant differences were observed in immunohistochemistry profiles between small-cell carcinoma of the esophagus and the lung. SOX2 expression was high in esophageal small-cell carcinoma (70%±33% of nuclei), small-cell lung carcinoma (70%±26%), and the embryonic esophagus (75%±4%), and it was significantly lower in poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (29%±28%). Rb1 expression was significantly lower in esophageal small-cell carcinoma (0.3%±1%), small-cell lung carcinoma (2%±6%), and the embryonic esophagus (7%±5%), and it was significantly higher in poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (51%±24%). The immunohistochemistry profiles of small-cell carcinoma of the esophagus and the lung are highly similar. The loss of Rb1 function is a key contributor to the pathogenesis of both neoplasms. In addition, SOX2 overexpression observed in esophageal and lung small-cell carcinoma as well as in the embryonic esophagus indicated that esophageal small-cell carcinoma may arise from embryonic-like stem cells in the esophageal epithelium. The two distinct differentiation patterns (neuroendocrine and glandular) of esophageal small-cell carcinoma further support the fact that SOX2 has a pivotal role in the differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into esophageal small-cell carcinoma cells.

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasm of the esophagus - Report of 14 cases from a single institute and review of the literature

BACKGROUND:

Most prevalent esophageal neoplasm is squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Other tumors are uncommon and poorly studied. Primary neuroendocrine esophageal neoplasm is a rare carcinoma and most of its therapy management is based on lung neuroendocrine studies. Neuroendocrine tumors can be clustered in the following subtypes: high grade (small cell carcinoma or large cell carcinoma) and low grade (carcinoids).

OBJECTIVE:

The present study aims to assess clinical and pathological neuroendocrine esophageal tumors in a single oncologic center.

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of patients and review of the literatures was performed.

RESULTS:

Fourteen patients were identified as neuroendocrine tumors, 11 male and 3 female patients. Mean age was 67.3 years old. Ten patients were classified as small cell, 3 as large cell and 1 as carcinoid. Four patients presented squamous cell carcinoma simultaneously and 1 also presented adenocarcinoma. Main sites of metastasis were liver, peritoneum, lung and bones. Most patients died before 2 years of follow-up. Patient with longer survival died at 35 months after diagnosis.

CONCLUSION:

Neuroendocrine esophageal tumors are rare; affect mainly men in their sixties or seventies. High grade tumors can be mixed to other subtypes neoplasms, such as adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Most of these patients have poor overall survival rates.

Clinicopathological Profile of Pure Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Esophagus: A South Indian Center Experience

Purpose. Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the esophagus are very uncommon with only a few studies published worldwide. Studies on clinical profile, management, and outcomes are very uncommon. Methods. We report the largest single institution retrospective review of 43 patients of pure esophageal NENs out of our registry of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors treated between 2005 and 2014. Data on the incidence, tumor location, clinical symptoms, stage at presentation, grading, treatment protocol, and treatment outcomes was collected and analyzed. Results. Among 1293 cases of esophageal cancers, pure esophageal NENs were diagnosed in 43 cases. The mean patient age was 55.8 years. The male : female ratio was 1.5 : 1. 81.4% of the tumors were located in the lower third of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC; G3) accounted for the vast majority of NENs (83.7%). 53.5% patients were Stage IV and 32.5% were Stage III at presentation. The combined median survival of stages II and III patients was 18.25 months, with treatment. The median survival of treated patients with metastatic disease was 6.5 months. Conclusion. Esophageal NENs most commonly were neuroendocrine carcinomas, presented in metastatic stage and were associated with poor prognosis. Grade 2 (G2) tumors had better outcomes than NEC (G3). In nonmetastatic disease, presence of lymph node metastasis and unresectable disease had poorer outcomes.

Adjuvant Therapeutic Modalities in Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of Esophagus Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Multicenter Clinical Outcomes

To evaluate the treatment pattern and survival of patients receiving radical resection for primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCCE).This retrospective study included 150 patients who received radical resection of PSCCE. Data were retrieved from 4 centers in Western China. Thirty-nine of 150 patients received postoperative chemo-radiotherapy, 62 received postoperative chemotherapy, and 49 received radical resection only. The median radiation dosage was 50 Gy. The chemotherapeutic regimen was platinum-based and lasted for 2 to 6 cycles (median, 3).Median disease-free survival (mDFS) and overall survival (mOS) were 12.0 and 18.3 months, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that postoperative therapy did not improve survival in limited stage I (LSI) disease, whereas postoperative chemotherapy improved survival in limited stage II (LSII) disease. Relative to chemotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy did not improve survival in patients with completely resected LSII disease. A multivariate analysis indicated an association of no postoperative chemotherapy with shorter DFS (P = 0.050) and OS (P = 0.010). Higher lymph node stage and length of disease longer than 3 cm were poor prognostic factors for both DFS and OS.Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in PSCCE patients with completely resected LSII disease. Adjuvant treatment with postoperative chemotherapy alone or postoperative chemo-radiotherapy does not increase survival in completely resected LSI disease.

Role of surgery in the management and prognosis of limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a rare, highly aggressive tumor characterized by early dissemination and a poor prognosis. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have been used alone or in combination for the treatment of this rare disease. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the role of surgery in the management of limited-stage SCCE at a high-volume center. We retrospectively evaluated 73 patients with limited-stage SCCE who received an esophagectomy at our center from January 1994 to December 2011. The clinical characteristics, median survival times (MSTs), overall survival (OS), and relevant prognostic factors were analyzed. The overall MST was 23.0 months, and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 61.6%, 47.9%, 22.7%, and 10.6%, respectively. The MST for patients without lymph node involvement (33.0 months) was greater than the MST for patients with lymph node involvement (17.0 months) (P = 0.014). Similarly, patients who underwent radical resection had a greater MST (25.0 months) than patients who underwent palliative resection (7.0 months) (P = 0.004). Patients who received chemotherapy had a greater MST (27.0 months) than patients who did not receive chemotherapy (13.0 months) (P = 0.021). Survival analysis confirmed that a radical operation, chemotherapy, and lymph node involvement were independent prognostic factors. This study suggests that radical resection combined with chemotherapy should be recommended for patients with limited-stage SCCE, especially patients with negative regional lymph nodes. A lack of lymph node metastasis was a good prognostic factor because patients without lymph node involvement had greater OS.

Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of The Esophagus - An Eight Year Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus is a rare and aggressive tumor. Patients present with metastatic disease and have a poor clinical outcome. The objective of the study was to correlate clinical and histopathological features of primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus diagnosed and treated at our hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 11 patients diagnosed with primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus in Kasturba Hospital, Manipal between 2006 and 2014 was done. The histopathological and immunohistochemical features were correlated with clinical and endoscopic findings.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were diagnosed to have small cell carcinoma of esophagus with a male preponderance. Common presenting symptoms were dysphagia and weight loss. Majority of the patients showed mid esophageal ulceroproliferative growth. Biopsy findings were consistent with the characteristic morphology of small cell carcinoma and demonstrated immunoreactivity to neuroendocrine markers. In addition, few cases also showed adjacent squamous dysplasia/carcinoma. Most of the patients presented with metastatic disease, liver being the most common site. These patients were treated by chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal small cell carcinomas are aggressive tumors with high rates of distant metastasis. Presence of squamous dysplasia /squamous cell carcinoma in the adjacent mucosa supports the hypothesis that this neoplasm arise from pleuripotent stem cells. Presence of the latter is also useful to rule out spread from lung primary.

Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Gastroenteropancreatic System: A Comprehensive Review

To date, empirical literature has generally been considered lacking in relation to neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), the highly malignant subgroup of neuroendocrine neoplasms. NECs are often found in the lungs or the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system and can be of small or large cell type. Concentrating on GEP-NECs, we can conclude that survival times are poor, with a median of only 4–16 months depending on disease stage and primary site. Further, this aggressive disease appears to be on the rise, with incidence numbers increasing while survival times are stagnant. Treatment strategies concerning surgery are often undecided and second-line chemotherapy is not yet established. After an analysis of over 2600 articles, we can conclude that there is indeed more empirical literature concerning GEP-NECs available than previously assumed. This unique review is based on 333 selected articles and contains detailed information concerning all aspects of GEP-NECs. Namely, the classification, histology, genetic abnormalities, epidemiology, origin, biochemistry, imaging, treatment and survival of GEP-NECs are described. Also, organ-specific summaries with more detail in relation to disease presentation, diagnosis, treatment and survival are presented. Finally, key points are discussed with directions for future research priorities.

Multimodality therapy is recommended for limited-stage combined small cell esophageal carcinoma

Background and aim

Limited-stage combined small cell esophageal carcinoma (LS-C-SCEC) is a rare, poorly understood, underdiagnosed disease, with components of both small cell esophageal cancer and non–small cell esophageal cancer. We investigated the optimal treatment strategy and prognostic factors in patients with LS-C-SCEC.

Patients and methods

LS-C-SCEC patients included in the analysis (from our hospital and the literature) were treated between January 1966 and December 2013. Patient treatment strategies included surgery (S), chemotherapy (CT), and radiation therapy (RT). The primary end point was overall survival (OS); the secondary end points included tumor complete response rates, patterns of failure, and toxicity. Kaplan–Meier curves were compared with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine prognosticators for OS.

Results

A total of 72 patients were included in the analysis: 24 (33%) from our hospital and 48 (67%) from the literature. The median OS of all patients was 15.0 months. Patients who received CT had a significantly longer median OS than did those who did not (OS 22.8 months vs 10.0 months) (P=0.03). Patients treated with multimodality therapy (including RT+CT [18%], S+CT [40%], or S+RT+CT [17%]) vs monotherapy (typically, S [18%]) had significantly improved OS (15.5 months vs 9.3 months) (P=0.02) and complete response rates. On multivariate analysis, tumor location (upper third of the esophagus) and type of treatment (monotherapy) were the only factors predictive of poor OS.

Conclusion

Multimodality therapy (including RT+CT, S+CT, or S+RT+CT) improves OS for patients with LS-C-SCEC compared with monotherapy (typically, S). Additional studies are necessary to personalize multimodal treatment approaches to individual patients.

Detailed analysis of prognostic factors in primary esophageal small cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is characterized as highly aggressive with a poor prognosis. To identify potential prognostic factors and to assess the role of surgical procedures, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for SCCE, we retrospectively analyzed patients with SCCE from three large institutions in China.

METHODS

All of the SCCE patients between 1998 and 2012 were identified from three clinical databases of the Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Peking Union Cancer Hospital and Shantou Cancer Hospital. Potential prognostic factors were analyzed with univariate analysis and a Cox regression model. Subgroup analysis based on the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for esophageal cancer was applied to examine the effect of treatment on survival.

RESULTS

In patients with stage I/II SCCE, 85% underwent operations and showed improved survival (median survival time [MST] 29 vs 17.4 months, p = 0.082). However, chemotherapy did not further improve survival. In patients with stage IIB/III SCCE, chemotherapy, instead of operation, improved survival (MST 13.0 vs 6.1 months, p = 0.003), and radiotherapy resulted in improved survival. In stage IV patients, chemotherapy improved survival (MST 12.5 vs 4.0 months, p < 0.001), and chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy was superior to chemotherapy alone (MST 13.2 vs 8.9 months, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical procedures alone can be recommended for stage I/IIA patients. In patients with stage IIB disease or above, chemotherapy should be the main treatment approach, and chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy tended to improve survival.

Cerebellar, brainstem and spinal cord metastases from esophageal cancer following radiotherapy: A case report and literature review

Cerebellar, brainstem and spinal cord metastases from esophageal cancer following radiotherapy are extremely rare. The current study presents the case of a 74-year-old male who was admitted to the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Hangzhou, China) with a poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus. Following radiotherapy, multiple abnormal signals in the brainstem and spinal cord were found on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Following palliative radiochemotherapy, the clinical symptoms and abnormal MRI signals in the brainstem and spinal cord were found to improve. This case revealed that brain metastasis from esophageal carcinoma may occur simultaneously with brainstem and spinal cord metastases.

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: clinicopathological study of 44 cases

Background

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a highly aggressive disease characterized by early dissemination and poor prognosis. Because of the rarity of this disease, few previous studies have investigated the biomarkers associated with its prognosis. Leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 5 (Lgr5) is a stem cell marker and a member of the canonical Wnt-signaling cascade. However, the clinical role of Lgr5 in SCCE remains unknown.

Methods

Tissue sections were obtained from 44 patients diagnosed with SCCE and expression of Lgr5 was examined by immunohistochemistry. The correlations between Lgr5 expression, and clinical parameters and prognostic significance were evaluated.

Results

Lgr5 was expressed in SCCE cancer tissues. High Lgr5 expression was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.003), late stage (p = 0.003) and unfavorable response to chemotherapy (p = 0.013) according to RECIST 1.0 criteria. Patients with higher Lgr5 expression levels had shorter overall survival times than those with lower expression levels.

Conclusions

These results demonstrated that overexpression of Lgr5 was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis, tumor stage, and response to chemotherapy. Furthermore, high levels of Lgr5 expression appeared to be associated with poorer survival in patients with SCCE.

Imaging of uncommon esophageal malignancies

Malignant esophageal neoplasms other than squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma are uncommon and include endocrine tumors, lymphoid malignancies, melanoma, malignant stromal tumors, and secondary tumors (metastases). Imaging, though not diagnostic in many cases, helps in selecting the appropriate treatment strategy by determining the anatomic extent of the tumor and locoregional and distant spread. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the imaging features of these uncommon esophageal malignancies.

High-incidence of PTEN mutations in Chinese patients with primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Background

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCCE) is a rare and aggressive tumor with poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the existence of EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA and PTEN mutations in PSCCE.

Methods

Clinical–pathological data and paraffin-embedded specimens were collected from 38 patients. Exons 18 to 21 of EGFR, KRAS and PIK3CA status were analyzed by real-time PCR based on ARMS and Scorpion technology in all patients, and the PTEN gene was also screened using real-time PCR and high-resolution melting curve analysis (HRMA).

Results

Only 1 (2.63%) out of 38 patients had EGFR mutations in L858R missense, and KRAS and PIK3CA were not found in the mutational spot in all patients. However, PTEN mutations presented in 14 (36.84%) out of 38 patients, including exon 5 coding for PTEN missense mutation (n =4, 10.53%), exon 6 (n =7, 18.42%), concurrent exon 5 and exon 6 (n =2, 5.26%), and exon 8 (n =1, 2.63%). Concurrent mutations of these genes were not detected in all samples. No statistically significant associations were found between the clinicopathological features and the mutation status of PTEN.

Conclusions

The incidence of PTEN mutations in Chinese patients with PSCCE was higher than that of previous reports in other histological subtypes of esophageal cancer.

A retrospective study of different treatments of limited-stage small-cell esophageal carcinoma and associated prognostic factor analysis

Primary, small-cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC) is a rare but highly malignant tumor. Due to lack of randomized, controlled, prospective studies, there are currently no unified treatment modalities for SCEC. This study retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of different treatments and prognostic factors that influence overall survival in patients with limited-stage SCEC. The study included 106 patients pathologically diagnosed with limited-stage SCEC at Huai'an First People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University (Huai'an, China), between 1998 and 2007. There were 66 males and 40 females, with a median age of 58 years (range: 45-77 years). Fourteen patients received surgery alone, 42 received surgery and postoperative chemotherapy, 11 received radiotherapy alone, and 39 received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Combined modality treatment with and without chemotherapy yielded 5-year survival rates (5YSRs) of 27.2% and 0%, respectively. Associated median survival times were 22 months and 11 months, respectively, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.30 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42-3.73, P = 0.001). Among patients treated with surgery plus postoperative chemotherapy or with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the 5YSRs were 31.0% and 23.1%, respectively. Median survival times were 26 months and 18 months, with an HR of 1.25 (95% CI: 0.75-2.09, P = 0.725). Multivariate survival analysis using Cox regression model showed that chemotherapy was a positive independent prognostic factor for SCEC (HR 2.92, 95% CI: 1.25-6.80). Chemotherapy-based combined modality treatment appears to increase the long-term survival of patients with limited-stage SCEC. Similar overall survival rates results are achieved with surgery combined with chemotherapy as with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, with chemotherapy being an independent prognostic factor. Randomized, controlled, prospective studies are needed to identify optimal chemotherapy regimens for treating SCEC.

The 2002 AJCC TNM classification is a better predictor of primary small cell esophageal carcinoma outcome than the VALSG staging system

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a rare and aggressive malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. The optimal disease staging system and treatment approaches have not yet been defined. This study aimed to evaluate the prediction of different staging systems for prognosis and treatment options of SCCE. We retrospectively accessed the clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment strategy, and prognosis of 76 patients diagnosed with primary SCCE between 2001 and 2011. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 58%, 31%, 19%, and 13%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification (P = 0.002), Veterans Administration Lung Study Group (VALSG) stage (P = 0.001), predisposing factors (P < 0.001), T category (P = 0.023), and M category (P < 0.001) were prognostic factors for overall survival. Multivariate analysis showed that the 2002 AJCC TNM stage (P < 0.001) was the only independent prognostic factor for survival. The value of the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the 2002 AJCC TNM staging system was larger than that of VALSG staging system with regard to predicting overall survival (0.774 vs. 0.620). None of the single treatment regimens showed any benefit for survival by Cox regression analysis. Thus, the 2002 AJCC TMN staging system improved the prediction of SCCE prognosis; however, the optimal treatment regimen for SCCE remains unclear.

Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinomas (MANECs) of the Gastrointestinal Tract: An Update

The systematic application of immunohistochemical techniques to the study of tumors has led to the recognition that neuroendocrine cells occur rather frequently in exocrine neoplasms of the gut. It is now well known that there is a wide spectrum of combinations of exocrine and neuroendocrine components, ranging from adenomas or carcinomas with interspersed neuroendocrine cells at one extreme to classical neuroendocrine tumors with a focal exocrine component at the other. In addition, both exocrine and neuroendocrine components can have different morphological features ranging, for the former, from adenomas to adenocarcinomas with different degrees of differentiation and, for the latter, from well differentiated to poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. However, although this range of combinations of neuroendocrine and exocrine components is frequently observed in routine practice, mixed exocrine-neuroendocrine carcinomas, now renamed as mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs), are rare; these are, by definition, neoplasms in which each component represents at least 30% of the lesion. Gastrointestinal MANECs can be stratified in different prognostic categories according to the grade of malignancy of each component. The present paper is an overview of the main clinicopathological, morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular features of this specific rare tumor type.

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a multicentre Rare Cancer Network study

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a rare and aggressive malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. The aims of this retrospective study were to analyze the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes of these patients. Between 1994 and 2004, 24 patients with SCCE from several centers were reviewed for data on demographics, presenting symptoms, diagnosis, disease stage, type of treatment, and outcome. SCCE occurs in the sixth decade: median age (interquartile range [IQR]): 65 (59-69) years with a male predominance (63%). The most common complaining symptoms were rapidly progressive dysphagia (79%), weight loss (54%), and retrosternal/epigastric pain (46%). The tumor arises primarily in the middle (52%) or in the lower (35%) third of the esophagus. History of tobacco and alcohol exposure was present in 90% and 70% of case, respectively. Extensive disease was present in 13 cases (54%) at initial diagnosis. The overall median survival (IQR) was 11 (8-20) months for all 24 patients, and the 2-year overall survival was 25.1%. Four patients were alive more than 2 years after treatment. Chemotherapy increased the survival compared with symptomatic management in extensive disease (median survival [IQR]: 9.5 [6-14] vs. 6 [4-7] months, P= 0.05). In limited disease, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy was more effective than non-concurrent treatment (median survival [IQR]: 36 [14-93] vs. 11 [9-15] months, P= 0.04). Two patients were treated by surgery and chemoradiation therapy with a survival of 35 and 66 months. Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment of SCCE in all stage. For limited disease SCCE, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is the primary choice compared with sequential approach. The role of surgery was not assessable in our study.

Surgical management for small cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Esophageal small cell carcinoma (SmCC) has been regarded as a rare and aggressive tumor with early metastasis. The optimal treatment has not yet been established, and the role of surgery has remained controversial. In this retrospective study, we report seven cases studies of SmCC of the esophagus and analyze the clinical outcomes after surgery. Between 1986 and 2007, there were seven patients with esophageal SmCC treated surgically in our institution. All the patients with clinically limited disease underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy. Lymph node involvement was found in all cases irrespective of the depth of tumor invasion. Three of the seven patients were diagnosed as having an extensive disease on pathological examination after esophagectomy. Five patients received postoperative chemotherapy. Two patients are alive with no recurrence at 16 months and at 45 months after surgery. Another one without chemotherapy survived 93 months and died of another disease. The remaining four patients died of recurrent disease or another disease. The median overall survival to date of these patients was 16 months (range 12-93 months). Esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy resulted in a relatively better survival in some patients with esophageal SmCC. We concluded that surgery may be helpful as part of multimodality treatment in selected patients with esophageal SmCC.

Superficial primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 15 cases

Primary esophageal small cell carcinoma (PESCC) is a relatively rare and aggressive tumor with poor prognosis. Systemic spreading and metastasis often occur at diagnosis. Although 5-year survival rate of superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus can be 86.1%, 5-year survival rate of superficial PESCC is still relatively low. This study mainly retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of 15 cases of superficial PESCC in our hospital from 1990 to 2004, in order to find suitable diagnostic markers and applicable therapies for this disease. The records mainly included presenting symptoms, demographics, diagnostic method, histopathology, follow-up, and therapy. Immunohistochemical staining of chromogranin A (CgA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), synaptophysin (Syn), neuronal cell adhesion molecules (CD56), thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), cytokeration 34betaE12 (CK34betaE12), cytokeratin (AE1/AE3), and cytokeratin 10/13 was performed. Incidence of superficial PESCC accounted for 4.8% of that of superficial carcinoma of the esophagus during the same period. Initial symptoms of all patients were dysphagia or accompanied with retrosternal pain and upper abdominal pain, and duration of these symptoms was 75 days averagely. Mean age of patients was 58.8 years old, and the male-to-female ratio was 2.75 : 1. Lesions were mainly located at middle thoracic esophagus. One, 2, and 5-year survival rates were 66.7, 33.3, and 6.7%, respectively. The median survival time was 19 months and mean survival time was 23.7 months after diagnosis. The percentages of PESCC samples with positive immunoreactivity were NSE 100%, Syn 100%, AE1/AE3 100%, CD56 93.3%, TTF-1 60%, CgA 53.3%, CK34betaE12 6.7%, and cytokeratin 10/13 0%, respectively. Our study suggested that PESCC was a rare and aggressive tumor with high malignancy. Superficial PESCC had rapid progression and poor prognosis compared with superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus at the same stage. The systemic therapy based on combination of postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy might be an effective approach for the treatment of superficial PESCC as a systemic disease. Higher proportion of positive labeling of NSE, Syn, AE1/AE3, CD56, TTF-1, and CgA in PESCC was valuably applied in diagnosis and differential diagnosis.

Concurrent chemoradiation alone with curative intent for limited-disease small-cell esophageal cancer in nine Japanese patients

Small-cell carcinoma of the esophagus is a rare and aggressive tumor with early widespread dissemination. In this retrospective study, we report clinical outcomes of limited-disease small-cell carcinoma of the esophagus from the analysis of nine patients. Between 2003 and 2006, nine consecutive patients with small-cell carcinoma of the esophagus were treated in our single institution, representing 2.8% of all esophageal malignancies treated with curative concurrent chemoradiation during this period. All the patients received four cycles of etoposide (100 mg/m(2), days 1-3), combined with cisplatin (80 mg/m(2), day 1), plus radiation therapy (50 Gy in daily doses of 2 Gy, 5 days/week). At the time of analysis, the median follow-up time was 10.8 months (range: 4.2-42.8 months) and 21.8 months in five living patients (56%). Of all the nine patients, five patients (56%) had a complete response, and the actuarial 3-year overall survival rate was 55.6%. This regimen resulted in a favorable 3-year survival rate. We conclude that the optimum treatment seems to be the same as for small-cell carcinomas of the lung, that is, a multidrug combination chemotherapy regimen used with concurrent radiation.

Small cell carcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus: a case report and review of the literature

Introduction

Gastrointestinal tract small cell carcinoma is an infrequent and aggressive neoplasm that represents 0.1–1% of gastrointestinal malignancies. Very few cases of small cell esophageal carcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus have been reported in the literature. An extremely rare case of primary small cell carcinoma of the distal third of the esophagus arising from dysplastic Barrett's esophagus is herein presented.

Case presentation

A 62-year-old man with gastroesophageal reflux history presented with epigastric pain, epigastric fullness, dysphagia, anorexia, and weight loss. Esophagogastroscopy revealed an ulceroproliferative, intraluminar mass in the distal esophagus obstructing the esophageal lumen. Biopsy showed small cell esophageal carcinoma. Contrast-enhanced chest and abdominal computed tomography demonstrated a large tumor of the distal third of the esophagus without any lymphadenopathy or distant metastasis. Preoperative chemotherapy with cisplatine and etoposide for 3 months resulted in a significant reduction of the tumor. After en block esophagectomy with two field lymph node dissection, proximal gastrectomy, and cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, the patient was discharged on the 14^th postoperative day. Histopathology revealed a primary small cell carcinoma of the distal third of the esophagus arising from dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. The patient received another 3 month course of postoperative chemotherapy with the same agents and remained free of disease at 12 month review.

Conclusion

Although small cell esophageal carcinoma is rare and its association with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus is extremely infrequent, the high carcinogenic risk of Barrett's epithelium should be kept in mind. Prognosis is quite unfavorable; a better prognosis might be possible with early diagnosis and treatment strategies incorporating chemotherapy along with oncological radical surgery and/or radiotherapy as part of a multimodality approach. Since treatment protocols are not well established due to the rarity of the neoplasm, multi-institutional studies are needed to obtain sufficiently large populations for investigation and optimization of therapy of the disease.

Esophageal pleomorphic giant cell carcinoma combined with small cell carcinoma

Herein is presented the case of an esophageal pleomorphic giant cell carcinoma combined with small cell carcinoma (SCC). The patient, a 77-year-old man, initially presented with dysphagia and hoarseness, and endoscopy indicated a large esophageal tumor. Despite chemoradiation therapy, the patient died from widespread local extension of the tumor and distant metastases approximately 8 months after onset of the symptoms. Histologically, the primary tumor was composed of pleomorphic tumor components, SCC components, and a tiny focus of squamous cell carcinoma. The pleomorphic tumor cells, consisting of solid sheets of poorly cohesive epithelioid cells and numerous multinucleated giant cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, were immunohistochemically positive for vimentin and desmin, with scattered positivity for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), but negative for myoglobin. These findings were histopathologically compatible with pleomorphic giant cell carcinoma occurring at other sites such as the lung. SCC cells, morphologically similar to their pulmonary counterpart, were positive for EMA and some neuroendocrine markers such as chromogranin A and NSE, and occasionally positive for vimentin and desmin. Esophageal pleomorphic giant cell carcinoma can occur in close association with SCC, and should be included in the differential diagnosis of esophageal tumors showing pleomorphism.

Small-Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus Associated with a Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndrome: A Case Report Documenting a Complete Response

We describe a case of small-cell carcinoma of the esophagus associated with a paraneoplastic neurological syndrome. Sensorimotor neuropathy had developed 3 years earlier, and neurological symptoms had slowly worsened. Small-cell carcinoma of the esophagus was incidentally diagnosed while investigating the cause of the neurological symptoms. A paraneoplastic neurological syndrome was diagnosed on the basis of cancer and exclusion of other known causes of neurological symptoms. The patient was given combination chemoradiotherapy. There was a complete response to three courses of chemoradiotherapy, with no evidence of disease recurrence 6 years after the diagnosis. There was no progression of paraneoplastic neurological symptoms after the complete response.

Small cell carcinomas of esophagus: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study

AIM: To observe the clinical and pathological characteristics of small cell carcinoma (SmC) of the esophagus and to investigate its possible tissue origin.

METHODS: Six cases (4 males and 2 females) of small cell esophageal carcinoma were retrospectively studied by light microscopy after Haematoxylin and Eosin (HE), histochemical and immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS: The tumors showed ulcer formation in 5 cases and fungiform in 1 case. Microscopically, two cases were of the pure small cell type, and four were squama cell carcinoma (SqC). Immunohistochemistry revealed all The positive rates were all 100% for cytokeratin (CK), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and neuron specific enolase (NSE), and 83% and 50% for synaptophysin and chromogranin A (CgA) respectively. The expression of P53 protein and ki-67 nuclear antigen (Ki-67) were 100% and 83.3% respectively.

CONCLUSION: The esophageal SmC is a rare tumor with high malignancy and has the potential to differentiate to epithelium and neuroendocrine tissues. It originates probably from multipotential primitive stem cells in the esophageal mucus.

Primary small cell carcinoma of esophagus: Report of 9 cases and review of literature

AIM: To analyze the clinical manifestations, pathological features and treatment of primary small cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus and to review the literature on this entity.

METHODS: The records of 9 patients with primary esophageal small cell carcinoma were examined and the demographic data, presenting symptoms, methods of tumor diagnosis, and types of treatment given, response to treatment, pathologic findings, and clinical outcome were reviewed. Features of mixed patterns of histological differentiation and lymph node metastases were specifically sought.

RESULTS: All the patients reported dysphagia, weight loss and chest pain as the initial symptoms. In 5 cases the tumors were located in the mid-esophagus, 3 cases in the lower third of the esophagus and 1 case in the upper third. The average length of esophageal involvement was 5 cm. They underwent radical resection, regional lymph node clearance and esophageal-stomach anastomosis in thorax or at neck. Two patients had a stage IIa disease, five had a stage IIb disease, and the other two had a stage III disease of International Union Contrele Cancer (UICC). All of them were histologically and immunohistochemically confirmed SCC of esophagus. Immunohistochemical staining for neuron-specific enolase (NSE), synaptophsin (Syn) and chromogranin A exhibited strong immunoreactivity in all specimens. Three of the nine resected specimens showed foci of squamous cell carcinoma in situ. Metastasis was present in 7 of 9 adjacent lymph nodes. All the patients survived the operations and made an uneventful postoperative recovery. They received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and local radiation therapy after discharge. During follow-up, three patients developed multiple liver, brain, lung and bone metastases and died between 5 and 18 mo after the diagnosis. Three patients developed widespread metastasis disease and died between 18 and 37 mo after the diagnosis. There was no local tumor recurrence in these 6 patients. The other three patients were lost during follow-up.

CONCLUSION: Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus is a rare but very malignant tumor. Radical resection combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy is helpful in limited stage cases.