Mediastinoscopy in patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Mediastinal Staging with Endobronchial Ultrasound in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Is It Necessary?

Herein we examine the need for minimally invasive mediastinal staging for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Early NSCLC, stages 1 and 2, has a 5-year survival rate between 53 and 92%, whereas stages 3 and 4 have a 5-year survival of 36% and below. With more favorable outcomes in earlier stages, greater emphasis has been placed on identifying lung cancer earlier in its disease process. Accurate staging is crucial as it dictates both prognosis and therapy. Inaccurate staging can adversely impact surgical candidacy (if falsely "over-staged") or lead to inadequate treatment (if "under-staged"). Clinical staging utilizes noninvasive methods to evaluate the anatomic extent of disease; however, it remains controversial whether mediastinal staging of early NSCLC with radiological exams alone is sufficient. EBUS-TBNA has altered the landscape of invasive mediastinal staging and is a crucial component to improving confidence in lung cancer staging, specifically in early NSCLC. Radiographic occult lymph node metastasis identified upon review of surgical resection specimens of early NSCLC may support the argument to perform EBUS-TBNA in all cases of early-stage disease. Other data suggest that EBUS-TBNA could be spared in cases of peripheral cT1aN0 and cT1bN0 for which surgical resection with lymph node dissection is planned. By reviewing reported EBUS-TBNA outcomes in patients with early NSCLC, we aim to emphasize the necessity of staging with EBUS in this population.

Prognostic factor and treatment strategy for clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical results of clinical N1 disease and to clarify the high-risk clinical N1 subgroup.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 2012, 137 patients who were clinically diagnosed as having N1 disease were enrolled. Their medical records were reviewed to assess clinical characteristics, radiologic findings, pathologic results, postoperative outcomes, recurrence patterns, and survival. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictive factors for pathologic N2 upstaging. To determine which factors were significantly associated with survival, a multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model was performed.

RESULTS

More cases were pathological N2 in adenocarcinoma than squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.039). The overall survival rates at 5 years were 54.9%, 36.7% in group upper lobe, middle and lower lobe, respectively (p = 0.013). Logistic regression analyses revealed that #10 positive (p = 0.002, HR 4.625) and adenocarcinoma (p = 0.029, HR 1.544) were significant predictor of pathologic N2 disease. Multivariate analyses revealed that pathologic N2 (p = 0.007, HR 4.186), middle and lower lobe (p = 0.009, HR 2.045) and presence of #10 (p = 0.024, HR 1.871) were independent prognostic factors. Patients with upper lobe and absence of #10 showed a significantly higher 5-year survival rate than patients with middle and lower lobe and presence of #10 (62.1 vs 25.9%: p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with cN1, pathological N2 disease, tumor in middle and lower lobe and clinical #10 lymph node positive were high-risk subgroup. Further analyses using larger numbers of patients with N1 disease from multiple centers are necessary.

Indications for invasive mediastinal staging in patients with early non-small cell lung cancer staged with PET-CT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Appropriate use of invasive mediastinal staging in patients with clinically node-negative NSCLC staged by PET-CT is critical in selecting patients for curative-intent therapy such as surgery or SBRT, but little data exists to guide this decision-making. We examined a large population of patients with clinical stage I NSCLC referred for mediastinoscopy or EBUS to find risk factors for occult N2 lymph nodes and determine which patients benefit from invasive staging.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We identified consecutive clinical T1-2N0 NSCLC patients being evaluated for curative-intent therapy between 2011 and 2015. None had evidence of nodal disease by PET-CT; the endpoint was pathologic confirmation of occult N2 disease by EBUS or mediastinoscopy. Tumor size, location, histology, SUV_max, and radiographic appearance were evaluated as determinants of occult N2 disease. Two group comparisons of continuous variables were done with independent t-tests and categorical variables were compared with χ² or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

In 284 patients with PET-CT-staged clinical T1-2N0 disease, the prevalence of occult N2 metastases was 7.0%. The negative predictive value of PET-CT was 92.9% and the negative predictive value of mediastinoscopy/EBUS was 96.3%. T2 tumors were more likely to have occult N2 disease than T1 tumors (11.8% v 3.6% p=0.009). Pure solid tumors had greater involvement of N2 nodes than tumors with any ground glass component (12.6% v 3.1%, p<0.001). 17.5% of central tumor cases were found to have occult N2 metastases while 4.4% of patients with peripheral tumors (P<0.001). 33.3% of patients with solid central T2 tumors had occult N2 metastases whereas 2.0% of patients with peripheral T2 tumors with a ground glass component, 1.2% of patients with peripheral T1 tumors with a ground glass component and 3.6% of patients with peripheral T1 solid tumors had N2 metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Invasive mediastinal staging should be strongly encouraged in central tumors and solid T2 tumors because the risk of occult nodal involvement is greater than 10% in these cohorts. However, for patients with peripheral T1 tumors or peripheral T2 tumors with a significant ground glass component, the yield of invasive staging after a negative PET-CT is very low and invasive staging may not be warranted.

The role of endobronchial ultrasound versus mediastinoscopy for non-small cell lung cancer

This review provides an update on the current role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and mediastinoscopy (Med) in assessment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Invasive mediastinal lymph node (LN) staging is the major application for both of these techniques. Up until recently, Med was the gold standard for invasive mediastinal LN staging in NSCLC. However, EBUS-TBNA has shown to be equivalent, and in some studies better than Med for invasive staging of lung cancer. EBUS-TBNA offers access to N1 LNs and development of the thin convex probe EBUS (TCP-EBUS) will expand EBUS-TBNA access from the paratracheal region and central airways to more distal parabronchial regions allowing for more extensive N1 LN assessment and sampling more distal lung tumors. EBUS-TBNA is more cost-effective than Med and it is currently recommended as the test of first choice for invasive mediastinal LN staging in lung cancer. Confirmatory Med should be performed selectively in patients with high pretest probability of metastatic disease. Addition of esophageal ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) may increase diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA mediastinal staging. Both Med and EBUS-TBNA can be used in primary lung cancer diagnosis, restaging of the mediastinum following neoadjuvant therapy and in diagnosis of lung cancer recurrence. In the future, a combination of EBUS-TBNA with or without EUS-FNA and Med is most likely going to provide the most optimal invasive assessment of the mediastinum in patients with lung cancer. The decision on test choice and sequence should be made on a case-by-case basis and factoring in local resources and expertise.

The Role of Fluorodeoxy-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Nodal Staging of Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer in Sequential Surgical Algorithm

With nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accurate mediastinal nodal staging is crucial to determine whether a patient is or is not a surgical candidate. Traditionally, computed tomography (CT) and fluorodeoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT are the initial steps followed by tissue sampling through mediastinoscopy and/or thoracotomy, which are invasive procedures. There is controversy regarding the possibility of omission of the invasive diagnostic procedures and solely relying on noninvasive presurgical staging CT and FDG PET/CT results. Eighty-three patients who had PET/CT, mediastinoscopy, and thoracotomy for NSCLC were analyzed. For all lymph nodes that may be sampled by mediastinoscopy, PET/CT sensitivity was 80%, specificity was 86%, positive predictive value was 47%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 97%; and for those in this group whose clinical stage was T1/T2 M0, sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 84%. For lymph nodes accessible only at thoracotomy, sensitivity was 42% and specificity was 88%. FDG PET/CT is accurate in assessing stations 2R/L, 4R/L, and 7 nodes and has the potential to replace mediastinoscopy in the treatment algorithm of T1/T2 M0 disease. A negative PET/CT may potentially prevent the patient from invasive mediastinoscopy given its high NPV. However, a patient with positive PET/CT should undergo tissue biopsy with pathology confirmation.

Endobronchial ultrasound versus mediastinoscopy for mediastinal nodal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Correct mediastinal staging is critical for determination of the most appropriate management strategy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) with that of mediastinoscopy in patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

A prospective trial was conducted in a tertiary referral center in Korea. Patients with histologically proven NSCLC and suspicion for N1, N2, or N3 metastasis were enrolled. Each patient underwent EBUS-TBNA followed by mediastinoscopy. Surgical resection and complete lymph node dissection were conducted in patients for whom no evidence of mediastinal metastasis was apparent after mediastinoscopy.

RESULTS

In total, 138 patients underwent EBUS-TBNA and 127 completed both EBUS-TBNA and mediastinoscopy. N2/N3 disease was confirmed in 59.1% of the patients. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of EBUS-TBNA on a per-person analysis were 88.0%, 100%, 92.9%, 100%, and 85.2%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and NPV of mediastinoscopy on a per-person analysis were 81.3%, 100%, 89.0%, 100%, and 78.8%, respectively. Significant differences in the sensitivity, accuracy, and NPV were evident between EBUS-TBNA and mediastinoscopy (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

EBUS-TBNA was superior to mediastinoscopy in terms of its diagnostic performance for mediastinal staging of cN1-3 NSCLC. Because EBUS-TBNA is both less invasive and affords superior diagnostic sensitivity, it should be the first-line procedure performed in patients with NSCLC.

Utility of mediastinoscopy in clinical stage I lung cancers at risk for occult mediastinal nodal metastases

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of mediastinal lymph node metastases is unknown for patients with clinical N0 lung cancer who are thought to be at high risk for occult nodal metastases. Further, the utility of mediastinoscopy in these patients is unknown. We performed a prospective trial to evaluate the utility of routine cervical mediastinoscopy for patients who may be at high risk of occult nodal metastases.

METHODS

From January 1, 2008, July 31, 2013, 90 patients with lung cancer with clinical stage T2N0 or T1N0 with standardized uptake value greater than 10 by positron emission tomography/computed tomography underwent routine cervical mediastinoscopy before lung resection. Biopsy of a minimum of 3 nodal stations at mediastinoscopy and a minimum of 4 nodal stations with lung resection was advised. The prevalence of nodal metastases at mediastinoscopy and lung resection was recorded.

RESULTS

Some 64% of patients with lung cancer were male with a mean age of 67.3 years. A total of 81 patients had clinical T2N0 and 9 patients had T1N0 with standardized uptake value greater than 10. Mean tumor size was 4.3 ± 1.7 cm, and mean standardized uptake value was 13.5 ± 6.8. One patient (1.1%) had occult metastases detected at mediastinoscopy. A total of 86 patients underwent surgical resection; 4 patients (4.6%) were upstaged to pN2, and 18 patients (21%) were upstaged to pN1. Of 90 patients with clinically staged N0 lung cancer by positron emission tomography/computed tomography, 5.6% (5) were upstaged to pN2 and 20% (18) were upstaged to pN1 (total nodal upstaging = 25.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Mediastinoscopy seems to have limited utility in these patients with T1 and T2 clinically staged N0 by positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Selective use of mediastinoscopy is recommended, along with thorough mediastinal lymph node evaluation in all patients at the time of lung cancer resection.

Invasive mediastinal staging: endobronchial ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound, and mediastinoscopy

Accurate mediastinal staging is essential to determining the optimal therapeutic strategy for many patients with lung cancer. Computed tomography and positron emission tomography are first steps, but frequently tissue sampling is recommended to confirm the radiographic findings. Mediastinoscopy has been the gold standard for thirty years, but the new technologies of esophageal endoscopic ultrasound and endobronchial ultrasound provide a less invasive method for biopsy. These techniques enable needle aspiration sampling of nearly all mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes, and experience with them is now sufficiently mature to conclude that they can be equivalent if not preferable to mediastinoscopy. The keys to achieving accurate results are skillful execution combined with sound clinical judgment regarding when to use which techniques. Patients with lung cancer are best served by clinicians experienced with all three methods for invasive mediastinal staging.

Prognosis of unexpected and expected pathologic N1 non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to compare clinicopathologic features and survival between patients with unexpected N1 (clinical N0-pathologic N1) and expected N1 disease (clinical N1-pathologic N1) after operation for non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

From 2003 to 2009, 305 patients who were found to have pathologic N1 disease after complete resection were retrospectively analyzed. Among these, 177 patients had negative findings for both computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT (group cN0). Sixty-eight patients had negative CT and positive PET/CT or positive CT and negative PET/CT findings (group cN0-1). Sixty patients had positive findings for both CT and PET/CT (group cN1).

RESULTS

Patients in the cN1 group had larger tumors (p<0.001), greater pathologic T stage (p=0.018), and greater percentage of squamous cell carcinoma (p<0.001) than did those in the other groups. Patients in the cN1 group had a greater number of positive N1 lymph nodes (p=0.004) and more frequent extracapsular nodal invasion (p<0.001). The 5-year overall survival was 66%, 63%, and 58% in groups cN0, cN0-1, and cN1, respectively (cN0 vs cN0-1, p=0.958; cN0 vs cN1, p=0.038). The 5-year disease-free survival was 54%, 52%, and 39% in groups cN0, cN0-1, and cN1, respectively (cN0 vs cN0-1, p=0.862; cN0 vs cN1, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with unexpected N1 disease showed better survival than did those with expected N1 disease, which seemed to be related to the pathologically minimal extent of the primary tumor and nodal involvement.

Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Correctly staging lung cancer is important because the treatment options and prognosis differ significantly by stage. Several noninvasive imaging studies and invasive tests are available. Understanding the accuracy, advantages, and disadvantages of the available methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer is critical to decision-making.

METHODS

Test accuracies for the available staging studies were updated from the second iteration of the American College of Chest Physicians Lung Cancer Guidelines. Systematic searches of the MEDLINE database were performed up to June 2012 with the inclusion of selected meta-analyses, practice guidelines, and reviews. Study designs and results are summarized in evidence tables.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of CT scanning for identifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis were approximately 55% and 81%, respectively, confirming that CT scanning has limited ability either to rule in or exclude mediastinal metastasis. For PET scanning, estimates of sensitivity and specificity for identifying mediastinal metastasis were approximately 77% and 86%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that PET scanning is more accurate than CT scanning, but tissue biopsy is still required to confirm PET scan findings. The needle techniques endobronchial ultrasound-needle aspiration, endoscopic ultrasound-needle aspiration, and combined endobronchial ultrasound/endoscopic ultrasound-needle aspiration have sensitivities of approximately 89%, 89%, and 91%, respectively. In direct comparison with surgical staging, needle techniques have emerged as the best first diagnostic tools to obtain tissue. Based on randomized controlled trials, PET or PET-CT scanning is recommended for staging and to detect unsuspected metastatic disease and avoid noncurative resections.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the last iteration of the staging guidelines, PET scanning has assumed a more prominent role both in its use prior to surgery and when evaluating for metastatic disease. Minimally invasive needle techniques to stage the mediastinum have become increasingly accepted and are the tests of first choice to confirm mediastinal disease in accessible lymph node stations. If negative, these needle techniques should be followed by surgical biopsy. All abnormal scans should be confirmed by tissue biopsy (by whatever method is available) to ensure accurate staging. Evidence suggests that more complete staging improves patient outcomes.

A practical algorithmic approach to the diagnosis and management of solitary pulmonary nodules: part 1: radiologic characteristics and imaging modalities

The solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is frequently encountered on chest imaging and poses an important diagnostic challenge to clinicians. The differential diagnosis is broad, ranging from benign granulomata and infectious processes to malignancy. Important concepts in the evaluation of SPNs include the definition, morphologic characteristics via appropriate imaging modalities, and the calculation of pretest probability of malignancy. Morphologic differentiation of SPN into solid or subsolid types is important in the choice of follow-up and further management. In this first part of a two-part series, we describe the morphologic characteristics and various imaging modalities available to further characterize SPN. In Part 2, we will describe the determination of pretest probability of malignancy and an algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of SPN.

Accuracy and predictive features of FDG-PET/CT and CT for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of T1 non-small-cell lung cancer manifesting as a subsolid nodule

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and predictive features of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and CT in lymph node (LN) staging of T1 non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) manifesting as subsolid nodules.

METHODS

From January 2005 to May 2011, 160 patients with pathologically proven T1 subsolid NSCLCs with LN staging were included in this study. Diagnostic accuracies of FDG-PET/CT and CT for LN staging were evaluated. Maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) and CT features of primary tumours were evaluated to investigate predictive factors for LN metastasis.

RESULTS

LN metastases were found in nine of the 160 patients (5.6%). No LN metastasis was present in patients with a solid proportion ≤50%. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for LN staging on a per-patient basis were 11.1%, 86.1% and 81.9%; those of CT were 11.1%, 96.7% and 91.9%. Among patients with a solid proportion >50%, there were significant differences in SUVmax, solid portion size, solid proportion and lesion location between patients with and without LN metastasis. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher SUVmax, a larger solid proportion and central location were independent predictors of LN metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET/CT adds little value to CT in the lymph node staging of T1 subsolid NSCLCs.

KEY POINTS

Lymph node (LN) metastases are important in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). • Positron emission tomography (PET) helps to stage solid NSCLCs. • FDG-PET/CT adds little to the LN staging of T1 subsolid NSCLCs. • No LN metastasis in patients with a solid proportion ≤50%. • LN metastasis is more common in solid and/or centrally sited tumours.

Negative predictive value of positron emission tomography and computed tomography for stage T1-2N0 non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nodal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial in evaluation of prognosis and determination of therapeutic strategy. This study aimed to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) in patients with stage I (T1-2N0) NSCLC and to investigate the possible risk factors for occult nodal disease.

METHODS

Studies investigating the performance of PET in conjunction with CT in the nodal staging of stage I NSCLC were identified in the MEDLINE database. The initiative of standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy (STARD) was used to ensure study quality. Pathologic assessments through mediastinoscopy or thoracotomy were required as the reference standard for evaluation of PET-CT accuracy. Stata-based meta-analysis was applied to calculate the individual and pooled NPVs.

RESULTS

Ten studies with a total of 1122 patients with stage I (T1-2N0) NSCLC were eligible for analysis. The NPVs of combined PET and CT for mediastinal metastases were 0.94 in T1 disease and 0.89 in T2 disease. Including both T1 disease and T2 disease, the NPVs were 0.93 for mediastinal metastases and 0.87 for overall nodal metastases. Adenocarcinoma histology type (risk ratio [RR], 2.72) and high fluorine-18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the primary lesion were associated with greater risk of occult nodal metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although overall occult nodal metastases in clinical stage T1-2N0 NSCLC is not infrequent, combined PET and CT provide a favorable NPV for mediastinal metastases in T1N0 NSCLC, suggesting a low yield from routine invasive staging procedures for this subgroup of patients.

[Utility of PET/CT for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer in stage III (N2)]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of integrated positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and computed tomography (PET/CT) in mediastinal lymph node staging in patients with potentially operable (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to ascertain the role of invasive staging in verifying positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study of consecutive patients with pathologically-proven NSCLC and N2 staging by enhanced CT was performed. A PET/CT scan was performed for all the patients. Lymph node staging was pathologically confirmed when it was possible or by consensus in the Thoracic Cancer Committee. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of PET/CT in N2 cases were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients with N2 by CT were evaluated. PET/CT showed N2 in 30 patients. Discrepancies were found in four patients, two patients were classified as N1 in PET/CT and two patients as N0. Lymph node staging was pathologically confirmed in 20 patients. No false positives were found in PET/CT study. Sensitivity was 94.7%, specificity and positive predictive values were 100% and negative predictive value was 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that integrated PET/CT provides high sensitivity and positive predictive value in mediastinal nodal staging of NSCLC patients. Therefore, in patients with potentially resectable lung cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy candidate, mediastinoscopy could be reserved for restaging after induction therapy.

Initial evaluation of the nonsmall cell lung cancer patient: diagnosis and staging

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The initial diagnosis and staging of nonsmall cell lung cancer patients is complex and involves multiple technologies. This review evaluates the recent literature and integrates it into a systematic method for evaluating patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The goal of the initial diagnosis and staging of nonsmall cell lung cancer is to provide sufficient information to allow definitive treatment. Initial steps should include a history and physical, basic laboratory tests, pulmonary functions, and PET-computed tomography (CT) imaging. If there is evidence of metastatic disease, then biopsy of the most advanced lesion is warranted. If there is no evidence of metastatic disease, the evaluation should focus on evaluation of the mediastinal lymph nodes. If there is evidence of nodal involvement by PET-CT, then endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration is warranted. If there is no evidence of nodal involvement on PET-CT, then either surgery or CT-guided fine needle aspiration is warranted. Other factors that should be kept in mind when selecting a diagnostic strategy include whether or not the patient is a surgical candidate, the impact of comorbidities, the type of cancer, the need for predictive biomarker analysis, and the range of possible treatment options.

SUMMARY

Integrating new technologies such as PET-CT and endobronchial ultrasound into the initial evaluation of patients can save unnecessary diagnostic procedures and lead to more rapid and accurate staging.

[The clinical value of routine preoperative surgical staging to mediastinal lymph nodes on lung cancer]

背景与目的

探讨肺癌术前常规纵隔淋巴结外科分期的临床价值。

方法

76例肺癌患者开胸术前常规行纵隔淋巴结活检，以术后病理为金标准，比对术前胸部CT和纵隔镜对肺癌纵隔淋巴结转移的诊断效能。

结果

术前胸部CT对纵隔淋巴结转移的诊断敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为68.5%、66.7%、68.4%、84.6%和16.7%。纵隔镜检查术则分别为87.5%、100%、84.2%、100%和60%。

结论

肺癌术前常规纵隔镜检查术对纵隔淋巴结分期的优势明显，具有极高的临床实用价值。

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration and its role in non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnostic impact and limitations

A diagnostic work-up to evaluate possible mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should be performed once suspected as a result of computed tomography. Cytological/histological verification is always compulsory. In recent years, diagnostic tools for mediastinal evaluation have made great technical progress with the introduction of endosonographic real-time ultrasound techniques such as endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Mediastinal masses as well as lymph node enlargement can be clarified by endosonographic guided biopsies and play a key role in cytological examination of mediastinal lymph nodes. The proven high sensitivity of endosonographic guided biopsies and the high negative predictive value of 20% may challenge mediastinoscopy, which has a sensitivity of 80-95%. However, with a higher positive predictive value and being the best explored method in the literature, mediastinoscopy still has a better diagnostic yield for mediastinal staging. However, according to us EBUS-TBNA should be considered for staging in patients with NSCLC primarily, but negative results must be followed by mediastinoscopic evaluation.

Joint use of cervical mediastinoscopy and video-assisted thoracoscopy for the evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of the joint use of cervical mediastinoscopy and video-assisted thoracoscopy for the sampling of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and candidates for pulmonary resection.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients diagnosed with NSCLC were submitted to cervical mediastinoscopy and video-assisted thoracoscopy. The samples obtained (from paratracheal chains, anterior and posterior subcarinal chains, paraesophageal chains and pulmonary ligament) were submitted to frozen section analysis. The following variables were also evaluated: age; gender; weight loss; diagnostic method; tomographic findings; histological type; staging; and location and size of the primary tumor.

RESULTS

In 11 patients, mediastinoscopy showed no involvement of the subcarinal chain, whereas such involvement was identified when video-assisted thoracoscopy was used: positive predictive value = 88.89% (95% CI: 51.75-99.72); negative predictive value = 94.34% (95% CI: 84.34-98.82); prevalence = 17.74% (95% CI: 9.2-29.53); sensitivity = 72.73% (95% CI: 39.03-93.98); and specificity = 98.77% (95% CI: 93.31-99.97). In 60% of the patients with involvement of the posterior subcarinal chain, the primary tumor was in the right inferior lobe. (p = 0.029)

CONCLUSIONS

The joint use of cervical mediastinoscopy and video-assisted thoracoscopy for the evaluation of posterior mediastinal lymph nodes proved to be an efficacious method. When there is no access to posterior chains by means of ultrasound with transbronchial or transesophageal biopsy, which dispenses with general anesthesia, this should be the method of choice for the correct evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer with mediastinal lymph node involvement

The optimal treatment for stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC remains controversial. Numerous studies with induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy show that both approaches in the neoadjuvant setting are feasible. Outcomes following induction therapy have been associated with mediastinal nodal response, with residual mediastinal involvement a negative predictor of survival. Appropriate selection of patients to undergo resection following induction therapy is critical. Lobectomy may be safely performed following induction therapy while pneumonectomy may carry a high and possibly unacceptable rate of perioperative mortality. Combined modality therapy has increased the overall survival of patients with stage III NSCLC. Future trials looking at different induction regimens with or without radiotherapy and with or without surgery may help identify the ideal treatment for this heterogeneous disease stage. The SAKK-16/00 study is an ongoing phase III European trial randomizing patients with stage IIIA NSCLC to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy with three cycles of docetaxel and cisplatin followed by radiation and then surgical resection, or to chemotherapy with the same regimen followed by surgery alone. Other ongoing trials include investigations of novel chemotherapeutic combinations, such as cisplatin with pemetrexed, in the phase II setting. The RTOG 0229 phase II study is evaluating neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin concurrently with radiation therapy, followed by surgery and consolidation chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin for stage III NSCLC. The combination of neoadjuvant docetaxel, carboplatin, and radiation therapy followed by surgical resection for stage III NSCLC is also currently being investigated in a phase II trial. The future of treatment for stage III NSCLC may lie in the outcome of trials investigating molecularly targeted agents, such as EGFR inhibitors, anti-angiogenic agents, or multitargeted agents. Optimal incorporation into the multimodality approach required of locally advanced N2 NSCLC will require careful investigation. The results from these trials are eagerly awaited.

Minimally invasive staging of N2 disease: endobronchial ultrasound/transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound, mediastinoscopy, and thoracoscopy

In 2005 the American College of Surgeons conducted a survey examining lung cancer practice patterns at 729 hospitals in the United States. In 11,668 surgically treated patients, 92% received a preoperative chest CT. Only 27% of these patients underwent mediastinoscopy, and lymph node material was sampled in less than half of these patients. At the time of surgical resection, additional mediastinal lymph nodes were sampled in only 58% of patients. In the remaining 42% only the lymph node material attached to the surgical specimen (N1 nodes) was sampled. Although this article discusses the finer points of the minimally invasive evaluation of the N2 lymph nodes, any procedure to evaluate these nodes is better than simply ignoring them.

CT, positron emission tomography, and MRI in staging lung cancer

Lung cancer is a common malignancy and remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in both men and women in the United States. Imaging plays an important role in the detection, diagnosis, and staging of the disease as well as in assessing response to therapy and monitoring for tumor recurrence after treatment. This article reviews the staging of the two major histologic categories of lung cancer-non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and small-cell lung carcinoma-and emphasizes the appropriate use of CT, MRI, and positron emission tomography imaging in patient management. Also discussed are proposed revisions of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer's terms used to describe the extent of NSCLC in terms of the primary tumor, lymph nodes, and metastases descriptors.

Invasive mediastinal staging of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition)

BACKGROUND

The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is determined by accurate definition of the stage. If there are no distant metastases, the status of the mediastinal lymph nodes is critical. Although imaging studies can provide some guidance, in many situations invasive staging is necessary. Many different complementary techniques are available.

METHODS

The current guidelines and medical literature that are applicable to this issue were identified by computerized search and were evaluated using standardized methods. Recommendations were framed using the approach described by the Health and Science Policy Committee of the American College of Chest Physicians.

RESULTS

Performance characteristics of invasive staging interventions are defined. However, a direct comparison of these results is not warranted because the patients selected for these procedures have been different. It is crucial to define patient groups, and to define the need for an invasive test and selection of the best test based on this.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with extensive mediastinal infiltration, invasive staging is not needed. In patients with discrete node enlargement, staging by CT or positron emission tomography (PET) scanning is not sufficiently accurate. The sensitivity of various techniques is similar in this setting, although the false-negative (FN) rate of needle techniques is higher than that for mediastinoscopy. In patients with a stage II or a central tumor, invasive staging of the mediastinal nodes is necessary. Mediastinoscopy is generally preferable because of the higher FN rates of needle techniques in the setting of normal-sized lymph nodes. Patients with a peripheral clinical stage I NSCLC do not usually need invasive confirmation of mediastinal nodes unless a PET scan finding is positive in the nodes. The staging of patients with left upper lobe tumors should include an assessment of the aortopulmonary window lymph nodes.

Efficacy of Helical Dynamic CT Versus Integrated PET/CT for Detection of Mediastinal Nodal Metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to compare the diagnostic efficacies of helical dynamic CT and integrated PET/CT for the prediction of mediastinal nodal metastasis in stage T1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-three patients with stage T1 NSCLC underwent both helical dynamic CT and integrated PET/CT followed by surgical nodal staging. In helical dynamic CT, patients were regarded to have stage N2 disease when a nodule showed a peak enhancement > or = 110 H or a net enhancement > or = 60 H. In integrated PET/CT, nodes were regarded as positive for malignancy when they showed > or = 3.5 in maximum standardized uptake value with a discrete margin and more 18F-FDG uptake than mediastinal structures. Sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies for mediastinal nodal metastasis detection were compared for helical dynamic CT and integrated PET/CT using the McNemar test.

RESULTS

Of the 143 patients, 34 (24%) had positive mediastinal nodes. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for mediastinal nodal metastasis prediction on helical dynamic CT were 65% (22 of 34 patients), 89% (97 of 109), and 83% (119 of 143), respectively, whereas those on integrated PET/CT were 56% (19 of 34), 100% (109 of 109), and 90% (128 of 143). The p values were 0.664, < 0.001, and 0.015.

CONCLUSION

In stage T1 NSCLC, contrast-enhanced helical dynamic CT better predicts, but not significantly so, mediastinal nodal metastasis than PET/CT, whereas PET/CT shows perfect specificity and higher accuracy than helical dynamic CT.

Positron emission tomography imaging in nonsmall-cell lung cancer

Positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-2-deoxy-D-glucose, a D-glucose analog labeled with fluorine-18, complements conventional radiologic assessment in the evaluation of patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PET is being routinely used to improve the detection of nodal and extrathoracic metastases. PET is also currently being evaluated in the assessment of prognosis and therapeutic response and by potentially allowing an earlier assessment of response may prove invaluable in the oncologic management of patients. The article discusses the diagnosis, staging, and assessment of treatment response and prognosis with an emphasis on the appropriate clinical use of PET in management.

The Future in Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer

Surgical techniques remain central to the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Clinical situations which invoke the role of surgery include the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary masses, staging of the mediastinum, restaging of the mediastinum and the assessment of resectability. The techniques available include cervical mediastinoscopy, anterior mediastinotomy, video-assisted thoracoscopy and different procedures for intra-operative mediastinal lymph node assessment including systematic nodal dissection, lobe-specific nodal dissection and sentinel node mapping. The staging of lung cancer is continuously evolving as technological advances combine with clinical advances to better stratify patients into treatment and prognostic categories and alter pre-operative investigation algorithms. Although most of the surgical techniques have been around for many years, it is their application in future which is likely to change. The increasing use of positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging is raising the proportion of patients being shown to have additional lesions that could contraindicate surgical treatment but which require tissue confirmation to exclude a false-positive examination. Many such lesions are amenable to the expanding techniques available to the interventional endoscopist. The relationship between the surgeon and the endoscopist must become closer to ensure that the appropriate technique is used at each point in the patient's pathway. The future of surgical techniques will be driven by: (1) developments in screening and imaging, with a likelihood that more early stage cancers will present and may be amenable to minimally invasive surgical approaches with the possibility of a role for robotics and nanotechnology; (2) improvements in neoadjuvant therapies which will demand flawless mediastinal staging and restaging; (3) advances in molecular biology which, whilst currently requiring that surgery provide samples of tumour and lymph node tissue to fully characterize the disease, do hold the promise that ever smaller amounts of tissue will be required and that eventually the genetic fingerprint will provide a biological ultrastaging to perhaps supersede anatomical staging.

Stage T1 non-small cell lung cancer: preoperative mediastinal nodal staging with integrated FDG PET/CT--a prospective study

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of integrated fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) (PET/CT) for the preoperative diagnosis of mediastinal nodal metastasis in stage T1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with surgical and histologic results as reference standards.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. From June 2003 to February 2005, 150 patients (89 men and 61 women; mean age, 59 years) with stage T1 NSCLC at stand-alone CT underwent integrated PET/CT and surgical staging. Two observers (one radiologist and one nuclear medicine physician) evaluated prospectively and in consensus the mediastinal nodes by analyzing both PET (functional) and CT (anatomic) images. Nodal stages were determined by using the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system and surgical and histologic findings as the reference standard. Statistical evaluation of malignant lymph nodes was performed on per-nodal-station and per-person bases.

RESULTS

A total of 568 mediastinal nodal stations were evaluated. Nodes were positive for malignancy in 34 (23%) of 150 patients and 55 (10%) of 568 nodal stations. For depiction of malignant nodes, the respective sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of integrated PET/CT were 42% (23 of 55), 100% (513 of 513), 100% (23 of 23), 94% (513 of 545), and 94% (536 of 568) on per-nodal-station basis and 47% (16 of 34), 100% (116 of 116), 100% (16 of 16), 87% (116 of 134), and 88% (132 of 150) on a per-patient basis.

CONCLUSION

Integrated FDG PET/CT provides high specificity and positive predictive value of mediastinal nodal staging in stage T1 NSCLC, although the sensitivity is low.

Poor results after surgery for bronchioloalveolar carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) is suggested to be less aggressive than other types of lung cancer. To assess the option of treatment modification, actual outcome data were studied and compared with results for other types of lung cancer.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent resection for stage I lung cancer in our hospital. For 18 BAC cases, histological specimens were re-evaluated and in three cases diagnosis was revised.

RESULTS

In the period 1989 through 2000, 15 patients with BAC and 260 patients with other tumour types underwent surgery in our hospital. Five-year survival rates were 24 and 53%, respectively, (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the poor results after standard surgery, parenchyma-sparing operations do not seem justified in patients with invasive BAC.

Do Hemodynamic Studies of Stage T1 Lung Cancer Enable the Prediction of Hilar or Mediastinal Nodal Metastasis?

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify CT enhancement characteristics that predict hilar or mediastinal nodal metastasis in patients with stage T1 lung cancer.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Eighty-four patients (50 men and 34 women; age range, 39-80 years; mean age, 61 years) with stage T1 lung cancer underwent a hemodynamic and a conventional morphologic CT study before curative surgical resection. Peak enhancement (maximum attenuation over the entire time course), net enhancement (peak enhancement minus preenhancement attenuation), maximum enhancement ratio (MER), time to peak enhancement, slope of enhancement on dynamic studies, nodule size, presence of tumor necrosis or thickening of bronchovascular bundles, and marginal characteristics on morphologic studies were analyzed and correlated with the presence of histologically determined mediastinal or hilar nodal metastasis.

RESULTS

Mediastinal or hilar nodal metastases were found at surgery in 26 (31%) of 84 patients: mediastinal nodes in 13 (15%) and hilar nodes in 19 (23%). Six (7%) had both mediastinal and hilar nodal metastasis. Peak enhancement, net enhancement, and MER were significantly associated (p = 0.001, 0.002, and 0.008, respectively) with the presence of mediastinal or hilar nodal metastasis. A peak attenuation of 110 H or greater and a net enhancement of 60 H or greater predicted nodal metastasis with accuracies of 73% (61/84 nodules) and 73% (61/84 nodules) and odd ratios of 4.98 and 5.94, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Stage T1 lung cancers showing peak enhancement of 110 H or greater or net enhancement of 60 H or greater on dynamic CT indicate a high likelihood of hilar or mediastinal nodal metastasis.

Cost-effectiveness of routine mediastinoscopy in computed tomography– and positron emission tomography–screened patients with stage I lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Accurate preoperative staging is essential for the optimal management of patients with lung cancer. An important goal of preoperative staging is to identify mediastinal lymph node metastasis. Computed tomography and positron emission tomography may identify mediastinal lymph node metastasis with sufficient sensitivity to allow omission of mediastinoscopy. This study utilizes our experience with patients with clinical stage I lung cancer to perform a decision analysis addressing whether mediastinoscopy should be performed in clinical stage I lung cancer patients staged by computed tomography and positron emission tomography.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our thoracic surgery database for cases between May 1999 and May 2004. Patients deemed clinical stage I by computed tomography and positron emission tomography were chosen for further study. Individual computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and operative and pathology reports were reviewed. The postresection pathologic staging and long-term survival were recorded. A decision model was created using TreeAgePro software and our observed data for the prevalence of mediastinal lymph node metastases and for the rate of benign nodules. Data reported in the literature were also utilized to complete the decision analysis model. A sensitivity analysis of key variables was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 248 patients with clinical stage I lung tumors were identified. One hundred seventy-eight patients (72%) underwent mediastinoscopy before resection, and 5/178 (3%) showed N2 disease. An additional 9 patients were found to have N2 metastasis in the final resected specimen, resulting in a total of 14/248 patients (5.6%) with occult mediastinal lymph node metastases. Benign nodules were found in 19/248 (8%) of patients. Decision analysis determined that mediastinoscopy added 0.008 years of life expectancy at a cost of 250,989 dollars per life-year gained. The outcome was sensitive to the prevalence of N2 disease in the population and the benefit of induction versus adjuvant therapy for N2 lung cancer. If the prevalence of N2 disease exceeds 10%, the sensitivity analysis predicts that mediastinoscopy would lengthen life at a cost of less than 100,000 dollars per life-year gained.

CONCLUSION

Patients with clinical stage I lung cancer staged by computed tomography and positron emission tomography benefit little from mediastinoscopy. The survival advantage it confers is very small and is dependent on the prevalence of N2 metastasis and the unproven superiority of induction therapy over adjuvant therapy.

Imaging of the Patient with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most common type of cancer and is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States for both men and women. Even though the 5-year survival rate of patients with lung cancer remains dismal at 14% for all cancer stages, treatments are improving and newer agents for lung cancer appear promising. Therefore, an accurate assessment of the extent of disease is critical to determine whether the patient is treated with surgical resection, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of these modalities. Radiologic imaging plays an important role in the staging evaluation of the patient; however, radiologists need to be aware that there are also important differences in what each specialist needs from imaging to provide appropriate treatment. This article reviews the role of imaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, with an emphasis on the radiologic imaging findings relevant for each specialty.

Le bilan préopératoire du cancer bronchique

INTRODUCTION

The overall prognosis of non-small cell carcinoma of the bronchus (NSCLC) remains poor on account of frequently late diagnosis and associated co-morbidity preventing the optimal treatment of the tumour. Surgical resection remains the best curative treatment for limited stage disease.

STATE OF THE ART

The pre-operative assessment should determine whether the extent of the tumour permits complete resection and whether the physiological state of the patient would tolerate the curative resection required. The ultimate goal is to improve 5-year survival. In the case of initial inoperability the assessment should determine whether pre-operative oncological treatment might make an advanced tumour operable (e.g. stage IIIA), or whether targeted medical treatment might improve the patient sufficiently to tolerate an intervention initially judged too risky. The rapid development of the technical modalities available for the assessment requires a continuous review of the current practice guidelines. Positron emission tomography has considerably augmented the accuracy of classical radiological assessment. Nevertheless staging by imaging alone remains imprecise to the extent that invasive examinations are still necessary to provide histological proof of the clinical stage of NSCLC. The techniques for assessing mediastinal invasion are developing rapidly and becoming more accurate and less invasive. Mediastinoscopy enhanced by modern video technology, ultrasound guided endoscopic biopsies and thoracoscopy are complimentary rather than competing techniques. The functional assessment should estimate the operative risk of the proposed pulmonary resection, identify the targeted actions aimed at reducing this risk or, in the absence of such actions, suggest less invasive but less well validated surgical techniques or even palliative treatments. When the operative risk cannot be reduced its precise estimation at least allows the patient to decide whether the risk seems acceptable in relation to the chances of a cure.

VIEWPOINT AND CONCLUSIONS

In the future the pre-operative assessment of NSCLC should improve the detection of micro-metastases in order to optimise the choice of induction and adjuvant therapies. The increasing use of induction chemotherapy before surgical resection can only increase the importance of a detailed assessment for the selection of patients and the evaluation of results.

Imaging of non-small cell lung cancer

Radiologic evaluation is an important component of the clinical staging evaluation of lung cancer and can greatly influence whether the patient is treated with surgical resection, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of these modalities. In addition to staging, the radiologic evaluation of the patient undergoing treatment and subsequent follow-up is important to the clinician for assessing treatment effects and complications. This article discusses the imaging of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and its use in management of these patients.