Successful use of Argatroban as a heparin substitute during cardiopulmonary bypass: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a high-risk cardiac surgical patient

Survey of Practice Pattern in Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Requiring Cardiopulmonary Bypass

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse reaction to heparin. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are routinely anticoagulated with heparin before the initiation of bypass. Heparin is contraindicated, however, in patients with acute HIT, and alternatives to routine practice are often used. While guidelines have recently been published addressing this topic 10, there remains variance between institutions in how these cases are treated. Our goal was to better delineate practice trends in the diagnosis and management of HIT patients requiring CPB.

METHODS

We surveyed members of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) and the American Society for Extracorporeal Technology (AmSECT) using an online survey tool.

RESULTS

We received 304 completed surveys (5.8% response rate), 75% completed by an anesthesiologist, and 24% by a perfusionist. The majority of respondents used clinical history and/or antibody testing (71% and 63%, respectively) to diagnose HIT. Seventy-five percent of respondents reported using an institutional protocol for HIT-CPB cases. Most respondents (89%) reported having at least 1 case in the last 3 years, with a total case experience of at least 785 cases (785 = the minimum number of cases in each case volume category × the number of respondents choosing that category). The strategy recommended in published guidelines, bivalirudin, was the most commonly reported alternative anticoagulation strategy (75%) used by respondents in HIT cases, with most (83%) using the activated clotting time (ACT) to monitor anticoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Most responding SCA and AmSECT members reported that their institution used a protocol or guideline for HIT/CPB cases, and most guidelines directed the use of bivalirudin as an alternative anticoagulant. Various other methods such as plasmapheresis are also being used with success in this patient population. Further research, including comparison studies of alternative anticoagulant strategies, is required to elucidate the best approach to these difficult cases.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Undergoing Valvular and Aortic Surgery: A Modern Assessment of Risk

Objective

The incidence and outcomes of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are well defined for general cardiac surgical populations. The purpose of this study was to define the outcomes of patients with HIT in a population excluding patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods

The local Society of Thoracic Surgeons cardiac surgical database was queried between January 2008 and May 2017 for patients who underwent either open valvular surgery or aortic surgery. Patients who underwent either isolated or combined CABG procedures were excluded. Cohorts were formed based on the presence or absence of postoperative HIT. Logistic regression models were built to determine the association between postoperative HIT and outcomes, adjusted for both preoperative and intraoperative variables.

Results

Of the total cohort (8,107 patients), 176 patients (2.2%) developed HIT after surgery. HIT patients experienced an increased incidence of morbidities postoperatively, including reoperation for bleeding, reoperation for cardiac and noncardiac etiologies, postoperative stroke, perioperative myocardial infarction, postoperative sternal infection, postoperative arrhythmia, new-onset renal failure, and dialysis (all with P < 0.01). The unadjusted 30-day mortality was 14.8% in HIT patients vs 4.9% in those without HIT ( P < 0.01). After risk adjustment, reoperation for noncardiac events, renal failure, new dialysis, postoperative stroke, arrhythmia, and sternal wound infection remained significantly elevated in patients who developed postoperative HIT.

Conclusions

Patients who developed HIT after non-CABG cardiac surgery experienced increased postoperative rates of morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and treatment remained mainstays of therapy. Early identification of patients at highest risk should prompt careful risk stratification when possible.

Use of argatroban in combination with nafamostat mesilate in open-heart surgery for a pediatric patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II: a case report

Background

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II) is a rare, immune-mediated complication of heparin therapy and can cause life-threatening thromboembolism. However, perioperative anticoagulation therapy for patients with a complication of HIT II has not been established.

Case presentation

A 6-year-old boy with tetralogy of Fallot underwent radical intracardiac repair with administration of argatroban at 1 year old due to positive HIT antibody. Reoperation was scheduled for pulmonary valve insufficiency, using argatroban and nafamostat mesilate as anticoagulants. Argatroban has a long onset time and the activated coagulation time (ACT) requires 7–26 h to return to the preadministration level, making hemorrhage control difficult, while half-life of nafamostat mesilate is shorter than that of argatroban. Celite ACT reflects the effects of both argatroban and nafamostat mesilate, but kaolin ACT reflects only the effect of argatroban. Due to the early termination of argatroban administration based on Celite and kaolin ACTs, ACT recovered to ≤ 200 s at 5 h after the end of argatroban administration.

Conclusion

Celite and kaolin ACTs can be used as markers to obtain close control of the required dose of argatroban in combination with nafamostat mesilate for the management of HIT II patients.

A 24-hour perioperative case study on argatroban use for left ventricle assist device insertion during cardiopulmonary bypass and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

A 44-year-old male with ongoing chest pain and left ventricular ejection fraction <20% was transferred from a peripheral hospital with intra-aortic balloon pump placement following a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The patient underwent emergent multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting requiring veno-arterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on post-operative day (POD)#9 secondary to cardiogenic shock with biventricular failure. Due to clot formation, an oxygenator change-out was necessary shortly after initiation. Following a positive heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) assay, a total circuit exchange was required to eliminate all heparin coating and argatroban was deemed the anticoagulant of choice due to acute kidney injury. On POD#24, the decision was made to implant a left ventricle assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to heart transplantation. There was difficulty achieving an activated clotting time (ACT) >400 s: multiple argatroban bolus doses were required, along with accelerated up-titration of infusion dosing. Despite maintaining an ACT >484 s, clot formation was observed in the cardiotomy reservoir prior to separation. Subsequently, the patient developed severe disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, with both intra-cardiac and intravascular thrombi, requiring massive transfusion and continuous cell saving due to severe hemorrhage post cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The patient received a total of 105 units of plasma, 74 units of packed red cells, 19 units of platelets, 13 bottles of 5% albumin, 6 units of cryoprecipitate and 2 doses of factor VIIa intraoperatively over the course of 24 hours. A total of 19.7 L of washed red blood cells were returned to the patient from the cell saver. With the LVAD in place, the patient developed transfusion-related acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome with right ventricular dysfunction requiring VA ECMO once again. On POD#30, ECMO was discontinued and the patient was discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) on POD 66. After a very complex post-operative stay with numerous surgeries and extensive rehabilitation, the patient was discharged home with the LVAD on POD#112.

An infrequent complication of a not so infrequent disease. Hit by HIT

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is not uncommon in cardiac surgery. Thrombosis is the most frequent complication. A 77-year-old man suffered cardiac arrest due to right coronary emboli. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed tissue valve thrombosis. He required support with an extracorporeal membrane oxygenator that also thrombosed. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was diagnosed, and anticoagulation was switched to argatroban. Heparin- induced thrombocytopenia normally presents as vascular thrombosis. In this case, the first symptom was tissue valve thrombosis causing an acute coronary syndrome. It is not an uncommon complication and should be considered if unexpected thrombosis and a sudden drop in platelet count develops after heparin exposure.

An Anti-Coagulation Conundrum: Implantation of Total Artificial Heart in a Patient with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Type II

BACKGROUND Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but life-threatening complication of heparin administration. It can present a major clinical dilemma for physicians caring for patients requiring life-saving urgent or emergent cardiac surgery. Studies have been published examining the use of alternative anticoagulants for patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), however, evidence does not clearly support any particular approach. Presently, there are no large-scale, prospective randomized studies examining the impact of alternative anticoagulants on clinical outcomes for HIT-positive patients requiring cardiac surgery. CASE REPORT We present the case of a patient who underwent SynCardia Total Artificial Heart (TAH) implantation following a recent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement. The patient was receiving argatroban for type II HIT with anuric renal failure, and developed a thrombus which occluded the inflow cannula of the LVAD. Based on a published study and after establishing consensus with the surgical, anesthesiology, perfusion, and hematology teams, we decided to use tirofiban as an antiplatelet agent to inhibit the platelet aggregation induced by heparin, and ultimately used heparin as the anticoagulant for cardiopulmonary bypass. CONCLUSIONS When selecting anticoagulation for a HIT-positive patient requiring CPB, so that benefits outweigh risks, it is of paramount importance that the decision be based on a multitude of factors. The team caring for the patient should have a shared mental model and be familiar with the pharmacology, devices used, and local practices. These three elements should be integrated with patient-specific comorbidities along with local monitoring capabilities to ensure safe, efficient patient care.

Cardiopulmonary Bypass Without Heparin

Due to familiarity, short half-life, ease of monitoring, and the availability of a reversal agent, heparin remains the anticoagulant of choice for cardiac operations requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, occasionally patients require CPB but should not receive heparin, most often because of acute or subacute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In these cases, if it is not feasible to wait for the disappearance of HIT antibodies, an alternative anticoagulant must be selected. A number of non-heparin anticoagulant options have been explored. However, current recommendations suggest the use of a direct thrombin inhibitor such as bivalirudin. This review describes the use of heparin alternatives for the conduct of CPB with a focus on the direct thrombin inhibitors.

Management of Patients with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia During Cardiac Surgery

The role of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and its possibly severe complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is increasingly appreciated. Increasing evidence indicates that in patients without the presence of antibodies, unfractionated heparins can be safely used during cardiopulmonary bypass, if their employment is restricted to this short period. This strategy is the first choice in patients with a current negative status of antibodies and in patients in whom surgery can be delayed until antibodies cannot be detected by laboratory tests. To date, however, no alternative anticoagulant to heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass has been approved. With the introduction of the class of direct thrombin inhibitors, effective anticoagulants have become available; however, they have no antidote and require specific monitoring. The availability of direct thrombin inhibitors is currently restricted. The administration of unfractionated heparin with anti-platelet agents such as prostaglandins or the short-acting platelet glycoprotein llb/Illa antagonist tirofiban is another option. Despite successful use of these strategies in fairly large numbers of patients, recent information suggests that in the case of tirofiban, renal failure may cause persistence of the agent with subsequent severe hemorrhage. If surgery is restricted to coronary artery bypass grafting, recent data show that off-pump strategies with use of the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin appear to be a promising option. Therefore, if surgery cannot be postponed, the anticoagulation protocol and the surgical strategy must be adjusted to the condition of the patient and the experience of the center in order to reduce the risk of these “offlabel” strategies.

Argatroban as an alternative to heparin in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits

We investigated the anticoagulant effects of argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, versus heparin in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuits. Three sham circuits were prepared according to our hospital’s standard practice and run for six hours simultaneously. Two circuits were anticoagulated with argatroban (one with heparin in the wet prime and one without). One circuit had heparin in the initial prime and was then anticoagulated with heparin. We measured thrombin generation (prothrombin fragment 1+2, D-dimer and thrombin-antithrombin complexes), activated clotting times (ACTs) and partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs), and monitored thrombus formation using thromboelastography. ACTs were >1000 s in each circuit throughout assessment. No clot initiation was detected by thromboelastography. Thrombin generation was decreased in circuits anticoagulated with argatroban versus heparin, despite aPTTs being less prolonged. These results suggest that argatroban may be more efficacious than heparin for anticoagulation in ECMO. Additional studies are warranted to further evaluate argatroban in this setting.

[Argatroban, a new antithrombotic treatment for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia application in cardiac surgery and in intensive care]

OBJECTIVES

Although heparin-induced thrombocytopemia (HIT) is uncommon, its thromboembolic complications are potentially life-threatening. The low-molecular weight heparins are less responsible of HIT than unfractionated heparin (UFH) but this latter is still indicated in some circumstances such as cardiac surgery. Argatroban, a selective thrombin inhibitor, recently available, has been indicated in HIT treatment. This review presents the main pharmacological characteristics, its indications and uses in the context of cardiac surgery and in intensive care medicine.

METHODS

Review of the literature in Medline database over the past 15 years using the following keywords: argatroban, cardiac surgery, circulatory assistance, cardiopulmonary bypass.

RESULTS

Despite its short-acting pharmacokinetic, argatroban cannot be recommended during cardiopulmonary bypass. On the contrary, argatroban is indicated in many circumstances in postoperative period of various cardiac surgeries (on-pump, off-pump, circulatory assistance). Nevertheless, after cardiac surgery, doses have to be adapted according to coagulation laboratory testing (ACT), particularly in patients presenting acute organ failure (kidney injury, heart failure, liver failure). This compound has no antagonist and is excluded during severe hepatic failure. The continuous intravenous administration is a drawback.

CONCLUSION

Argatroban is a new direct competitive thrombin inhibitor well evaluated as treatment of HIT after cardiac surgery. In HIT management, argatroban is an interesting alternative to lepirudin that is not anymore available and danaparoid because of supply disturbances.

Pathology consultation on monitoring direct thrombin inhibitors and overcoming their effects in bleeding patients

OBJECTIVES

Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), a relatively new class of anticoagulants, present several challenges regarding monitoring of their anticoagulant effects and overcoming bleeding associated with their use. The aim of this article is to (1) briefly present the pharmacologic properties of currently available DTIs, (2) discuss approaches to laboratory assessment of these drugs, and (3) review management of bleeding associated with their use.

METHODS

Published literature on DTIs, including clinical trials, case reports, and experimental animal models, was reviewed. The primary authors also reviewed their first-hand experiences with DTI anticoagulation.

RESULTS

Based on the literature review and the practical experiences of the authors, suggestions for the monitoring of DTIs and algorithmic approaches for the management of DTI-associated bleeding were developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine coagulation assays (eg, the prothrombin time) show a relatively poor correlation with the degree of anticoagulation and DTI drug concentrations. Newer assays, such as the ecarin clotting time and dilute thrombin time, may be more useful in assessing DTI anticoagulation, but these assays are not yet widely available. Low-grade DTI-associated bleeds are best managed with cessation of the drug and supportive care, while higher-grade and/or life-threatening bleeds may best be reversed by active drug removal (eg, via the administration of activated charcoal or hemodialysis). At present there is little evidence to suggest that transfusion products such as factor concentrates or thawed plasma are of any particular benefit in DTI reversal; however, these products may play a supportive role in the management of bleeding.

Non-recovery of ACT in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II during mitral valve replacement using argatroban anticoagulation

Argatroban was used as the anticoagulant during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II undergoing mitral valve replacement. Dosage was reduced because of preoperative congestive liver disorder. Perioperative coagulability was poor, and, ultimately, failure of hemostasis led to a fatal outcome. Although argatroban use as an anticoagulant for HIT is reported, the optimal dose has not been established. During long-term CPB, increasing the total dosage may extend anticoagulant ability, leading to dose dependence. Because no antagonist for argatroban exists, failure of hemostasis might occur.

Difficulty in the management of anticoagulation with argatroban during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can often result in devastating thromboembolic outcomes. Argatroban is frequently administered as an alternative anticoagulant to heparin. We present a complicated case of HIT in which off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting was performed using anticoagulation with argatroban. Although the active clotting time was maintained between 220 and 270 s using argatroban, intraoperative thrombotic complications and postoperative prolonged coagulopathy were encountered. <Learning objective: The use of argatroban involves a potential risk of inadequate anticoagulation or life-threatening postoperative bleeding depending on the dose. We recommend that the target ACT during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with argatroban should be strictly maintained over 250 s, although an ACT exceeding 300 s may cause prolonged coagulopathy>.

Challenges encountered with argatroban anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass

Use of argatroban as an alternative to heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia has gained some attention in the past two decades. Dosing of argatroban during CPB is complex due to lack of complete understanding of its pharmacokinetic profile and the various elements during CPB that may alter its plasma levels. We report a case where the challenges in dosing argatroban led to failure to provide adequate anticoagulation during CPB, as evidenced by clot formation in the oxygenator, and extensive bleeding in the postoperative period.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in cardiovascular patients: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a life-threatening immune-mediated platelet activation condition that can cause arterial and venous thromboembolism. The triggering complex, platelet factor 4/heparin antibody, has several unique immunologic characteristics that have not been well elucidated until recently. In patients undergoing cardiovascular procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery, the prevalence of platelet factor 4/heparin antibody is significantly higher than that in the general population. The acuity and graveness of the thromboembolic phenomenon requires early diagnosis and empirical initiation of treatment, even before confirmatory test results are available. Also, although multiple therapeutic modalities exist, the safety and efficacy of each option depends upon the clinical setting. Therefore, this review will focus on the updated pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, new diagnostic criteria, and the various treatment options for cardiovascular patients with different conditions.

Pharmacology of argatroban

Argatroban is a synthetic, small-molecule direct thrombin inhibitor that is approved in the USA, the EU and Japan for prophylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and for anticoagulation of HIT patients undergoing PCI. Argatroban binds reversibly to, and inhibits both soluble and clot-bound thrombin. Argatroban does not generate antibodies, is not susceptible to degradation by proteases and is cleared hepatically. It has a predictable anticoagulant effect and there is a good correlation between dose, plasma concentration and pharmacodynamic effect. Initial clinical studies suggest that further investigations to establish the use of argatroban in ischemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome, hemodialysis, blood oxygenation, off-pump cardiac surgery and other clinical indications are warranted.

Safety and efficacy of the argatroban therapy during the early post-cardiac surgery period

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is associated with a high incidence of vein graft occlusion after cardiac surgery. When HIT is suspected during the post-operative period, current guideline recommends a direct thrombin inhibitor such as argatroban to be started immediately. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of argatroban in the early period after cardiac surgery. All patients who received argatroban within 72 h after cardiac surgery from September 2005 to June 2009 from a single center were included. Patient demographics, pre-operative relevant history, intra-operative events and post-operative data were collected and analyzed. The primary endpoints were bleeding, thrombotic complication during or after argatroban administration, and in-hospital mortality. The study population comprised 31 patients administered argatroban within 72 h after cardiac surgery. Argatroban was started a mean of 1.7 days after surgery (median dose, 0.66 μg/kg/min; median duration, 5.9 days). Twenty patients (64.5%) experienced bleeding; episode driven entirely by the need for blood transfusion. No new thromboembolic complication occurred during or after argatroban infusion. One patient died from aspiration pneumonia. Compared to those without bleeding complications, patients who bled had longer operation times and increased use of intra-aortic balloon pump. However, argatroban therapy including the starting time, median dose, infusion duration, and activated partial thromboplastin times showed no difference between the two groups. In cardiac surgery patients with clinical suspicion of HIT, early postoperative use of argatroban seems well-tolerated and associated with a low risk of thrombotic events.

Prolonged elevation of plasma argatroban in a cardiac transplant patient with a suspected history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) provide an alternative method of anticoagulation for patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or HIT with thrombosis (HITT) undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In the following report, a 65-year-old critically ill patient with a suspected history of HITT was administered argatroban for anticoagulation on bypass during heart transplantation. The patient required massive transfusion support (55 units of red blood cells, 42 units of fresh-frozen plasma, 40 units of cryoprecipitate, 40 units of platelets, and three doses of recombinant Factor VIIa) for severe intraoperative and postoperative bleeding.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Plasma samples from before and after CPB were analyzed postoperatively for argatroban concentration using a modified ecarin clotting time (ECT) assay.

RESULTS

Unexpectedly high concentrations of argatroban were measured in these samples (range, 0-32 microg/mL), and a prolonged plasma argatroban half life (t(1/2)) of 514 minutes was observed (published elimination t(1/2) is 39-51 minutes [< or = 181 minutes with hepatic impairment]).

CONCLUSIONS

Correlation of plasma argatroban concentration versus the patient's coagulation variables and clinical course suggest that prolonged elevated levels of plasma argatroban may have contributed to the patient's extended coagulopathy. Because DTIs do not have reversal agents, surgical teams and transfusion services should remain aware of the possibility of massive transfusion events during anticoagulation with these agents. This is the first report to measure plasma argatroban concentration in the context of CPB and extended coagulopathy.

[Direct thrombin inhibitors: pharmacology and application in cardiovascular anesthesia]

The options for drug-controlled anticoagulation are becoming noticeably more manifold. In the area of anaesthesiology and intensive care, there are furthermore special disease patterns, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) to be known, diagnosed and treated. This article gives a review of the substance groups of the direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) as alternative anticoagulants for HIT in combination with cardiovascular diseases. For the administration of DTIs, experience and the correct dose are the keys to success and are the deciding factors for the two sides of haemostasis: thrombosis and haemorrhage.

Focus on Thrombin: Alternative Anticoagulants

Unfractionated heparin and protamine have been integral to cardiopulmonary bypass since cardiac surgery was first undertaken. These drugs are inexpensive and well understood but are contraindicated in some individuals, and resistance to heparin can be problematic in others. The interplay between the endothelium, anticoagulants, the coagulation cascade, and the inflammatory response that characterizes cardiac surgery may contribute to some of the complications associated with cardiopulmonary bypass. Various alternative drugs and strategies have been used to manage patients unsuitable for heparin or protamine, but each has its own disadvantages. At present, direct thrombin inhibitors may offer the best available alternative to heparin in cardiac surgery, particularly the short-acting bivalirudin, but this class of anticoagulants is relatively expensive and has no reversal agent. Balanced anticoagulation using combinations of drugs that act at different stages in the coagulation system may improve the management of coagulation in cardiac surgery, but careful investigation of this concept is needed.

Thrombocytopenia associated with antithrombotic therapy in patients with cardiovascular diseases: diagnosis and treatment

Agents with antiplatelet and anticoagulant activity have been proved to be effective in reducing the incidence of complications following acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous coronary intervention, and cardiopulmonary bypass. However, these agents, including heparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, and thienopyridines, are associated with increased risk of bleeding and thrombocytopenia and have been administered together with increasing frequency in a variety of cardiovascular settings. Therefore, clinicians must be familiar with the safety and rational use of these potent antithrombotic agents. Clinical features of thrombocytopenia range from bleeding to thrombosis, even death, and therapy is very different depending on the underlying cause. Additionally, patients may sometimes need urgent intervention or surgery. Thus, it is essential to quickly discriminate the etiology and start appropriate therapy. This review highlights the pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory manifestation, differential diagnosis, and treatment of antithrombotic drug-induced thrombocytopenia in cardiovascular diseases.

A case series describing the use of argatroban in patients on extracorporeal circulation

Anticoagulation for extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is routinely achieved using heparin, which can be difficult in patients suspected of having heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. We describe a case series of five patients in which we used argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, as an alternative to heparin for systemic anticoagulation during ECLS in patients suspected to have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Argatroban was used to achieve target systemic anticoagulation for activate clotting times between 210 and 230. Duration of argatroban use while on ECLS ranged from 6 to 184 hours. Argatroban dosage ranged from 0.2 to 3.5 microg/kg/min. Activated clotting times showed good agreement with aPTT. In conclusion, we illustrate that argatroban is a reasonable alternative to heparin anticoagulation for patients requiring ECLS.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Treatment Options and Special Considerations

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse effect that typically manifests several days after the start of heparin therapy, although both rapid- and delayed-onset HIT have been described. Its most serious complication is thrombosis. Although not all patients develop thrombosis, it can be life threatening. The risk of developing HIT is related to many factors, including the type of heparin product administered, route of administration, duration of therapy, patient population, and previous exposure to heparin. The diagnosis of HIT is typically based on clinical presentation, exposure to heparin, and presence of thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis. Antigen and activation laboratory assays are available to support the diagnosis of HIT. However, because of the limited sensitivity and specificity of these assays, bedside probability scales for HIT were developed. When HIT is suspected, prompt cessation of all heparin therapy is necessary, along with initiation of alternative anticoagulant therapy. Two direct thrombin inhibitors--argatroban and lepirudin--are approved for the management of HIT in the United States, and bivalirudin is approved for use in patients with HIT who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Other agents, although not approved to manage HIT, have also been used; however, their role in therapy requires further evaluation. A comprehensive HIT management strategy involves the evaluation of numerous factors. Many patients, including those undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, those with acute coronary syndromes, those with hepatic or renal insufficiency, and children, require special attention. Clinicians must become familiar with the available information on this serious adverse effect and its treatment so that optimum patient management strategies may be formulated.

Argatroban for anticoagulation during cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to report our experience and review the published data on argatroban administration during adult cardiac surgery.

METHODS

The information on all reported cases of argatroban use in adults, during cardiac surgery was reviewed, including that of the patient described here. This analysis focused on patient characteristics, type of surgery, argatroban dosing schedule, monitoring of anticoagulation and outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-one cases have been reported. Fifteen patients underwent off-pump surgical procedures with the argatroban dose adjusted to maintain an activated clotting time (ACT) range between 200 and 300 s. Three intraoperative thrombi occurred in two patients when the ACT was <280 s. None had coagulopathy. Six cases reported the use of argatroban during on-pump cardiac surgery dosed to keep the ACT >400 s. Intraoperative thrombotic complications were not reported in this group; however, one clot in the pump was noted after the procedure when the ACT was between 300 and 350 s. All six cases required larger volumes of perioperative blood products and three had severe coagulopathy. Of the 21 cases, seven had an indication for continued anticoagulation following surgery. Four cases did not report further use of argatroban after surgery. Three patients received argatroban after surgery without complications. Recommendations for how to use argatroban during cardiac surgery are proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

Argatroban, with ACT monitoring, might be safely used for anticoagulation during cardiac surgery.

Recombinant factor VIIa for refractory bleeding after cardiac surgery secondary to anticoagulation with the direct thrombin inhibitor lepirudin

A 56-year-old man with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis syndrome (HITTS) received anticoagulation with recombinant hirudin (lepirudin) for emergency coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and aortic valve replacement. The patient experienced life-threatening refractory bleeding that was successfully treated with recombinant factor VIIa. He had a history of infective endocarditis that resulted in severe aortic insufficiency, three-vessel coronary artery disease, and acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis. The patient was transferred from another hospital for the emergency surgery, but before his transfer, he developed HITTS secondary to therapeutic heparin for a deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity. The presence of HITTS, the urgent nature of the case, and the availability of the direct thrombin inhibitor led the surgical team to select lepirudin for anticoagulation to facilitate cardiopulmonary bypass. After separation from cardiopulmonary bypass, the patient was in a coagulopathic state due to the inability to reverse the lepirudin and the slowed elimination of the drug secondary to inadequate renal function. As a result, the patient experienced excessive generalized oozing that was unresponsive to traditional therapies and blood product transfusions. Recombinant factor VIIa 35 microg/kg was given as rescue therapy. The bleeding slowed, which allowed placement of chest tubes and closing of the sternum. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit in stable condition with no evidence of thrombosis in the freshly placed bypass grafts or on the bioprosthetic valve. Recombinant factor VIIa appears to be a suitable option as salvage therapy in patients with refractory bleeding secondary to anticoagulation with a direct thrombin inhibitor during cardiac surgery.

Update on the clinical applications of argatroban

The small molecule, arginomimetic drug argatroban is the first synthetic direct antithrombin to be approved for clinical use. Argatroban reversibly binds to and inhibits both soluble and clot-bound thrombin. In contrast to other direct thrombin inhibitors, argatroban upregulates nitric oxide, enhancing its antithrombotic effect, does not generate antibodies, is not susceptible to degradation by proteases and is hepatically cleared. It has a predictable anticoagulant effect. Argatroban has proven efficacy and safety for prophylaxis and treatment of patients with thrombosis associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and for percutaneous coronary intervention in HIT and non-HIT patients. Pilot studies suggest that further investigations to establish the use of argatroban in ischemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome, hemodialysis, blood oxygenation, off-pump cardiac surgery and other clinical indications are warranted.

Bivalirudin anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE

To describe the perioperative management in a heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) positive patient who had prosthetic valve endocarditis and an aortic root abscess. The patient underwent high-risk cardiac re-operation with the use of the alternative anticoagulant, bivalirudin.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A 62-yr-old patient who underwent stentless tissue aortic valve replacement with a Toronto-SPV valve in 1998, was admitted to hospital with symptoms of stroke. A heparin infusion was started and further investigation revealed positive blood cultures. The patient developed HIT which was confirmed by laboratory tests. Echocardiographic examination performed one month later showed vegetations on the aortic tissue valve and a small aortic root abscess. The patient still tested positively for the presence of HIT antibodies and was treated conservatively with antibiotics. A repeat echocardiographic examination showed progression of the aortic root abscess and it was decided to proceed with urgent redo aortic valve surgery. Anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was achieved with the use of a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), bivalirudin. Following an uneventful wean from CPB, hemostasis was achieved within 40 min. The postoperative course was uncomplicated and the patient was discharged from hospital on the seventh postoperative day.

CONCLUSION

Bivalirudin is a DTI, which can be used as an alternative anticoagulant for CPB in HIT positive patients. This case report showed a favourable outcome with bivalirudin for urgent complex redo cardiac surgery requiring CPB.

Anticoagulation management and cardiac surgery in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the gold standard for anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Of patients undergoing CPB operations, 25% to 50% develop heparin-dependent antibodies during the postoperative period, typically between day 5 and 10, if UFH is continued during the postoperative course. In 1% to 3% of all patients undergoing CPB operation with UFH anticoagulation, these antibodies activate platelets causing a prothrombotic disorder, known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which can lead to life-threatening thromboembolic complications. If urgent cardiac operation with the use of CPB in patients with positive antibody titer is required, different anticoagulatory approaches are available, such as lepirudin, bivalirudin, and danaparoid or UFH in combination with platelet antagonists, such as epoprostenol or tirofiban. In patients with previous HIT but no detectable antibodies, UFH alone can be used only during CPB, but alternative anticoagulation has to be used pre- and postoperatively.

Alternative parenteral anticoagulation with argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor

Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, effectively inhibits free and clot-bound thrombin without the need of a cofactor and exerts dose-dependent anticoagulant effects that are rapidly active and rapidly reversible (elimination half-life: 39-51 min). Argatroban provides predictable parenteral anticoagulation and is well tolerated with an acceptably low bleeding risk in a variety of clinical settings, including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, acute ischemic stroke, percutaneous coronary intervention and hemodialysis. This review will discuss the clinical pharmacology and utility of argatroban; in particular, clinical trial experiences will be discussed in patients with, or at risk of, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (where heparins must be avoided) including those requiring hemodialysis or percutaneous coronary intervention, and in patients with acute ischemic stroke (where heparins are not generally recommended).

Argatroban for anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass in an infant

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare, but potentially life-threatening complication of heparin therapy. In patients with HIT, alternative means of anticoagulation are necessary. The authors present an infant with HIT who required anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass for tricuspid valve excision in the treatment of bacterial endocarditis. The direct thrombin inhibitor, argatroban, was successfully used. Previous reports regarding the use of argatroban and other nonheparin anticoagulants for anticoagulation are reviewed and suggestions regarding argatroban dosing in infants are presented.

Diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin use is ubiquitous, wherein 1 to 5% of patients exposed to standard unfractionated heparin develop thrombocytopenia due to antibodies to a complex of heparin and platelet factor 4. Classic features include onset of thrombocytopenia after 5 to 10 days of ongoing heparin exposure, a 50% fall in the platelet count from baseline, resolution of the thrombocytopenia 5 to 10 days after cessation of heparin and a high risk of thrombosis noted in 30 to 75% of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in terms of every-other-day platelet-count monitoring in patients on standard unfractionated heparin. And those patients developing thrombocytopenia necessitate an accurate, readily accessible diagnostic test for HIT. Diagnosis has been recently facilitated by the development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test for the heparin-P4 antibody complex, although this test carries a relatively low specificity. Widespread use of the ELISA demonstrates a relatively high prevalence of the antibody in patients exposed to heparin in certain settings, such as cardiopulmonary bypass, wherein a quarter of patients have a positive ELISA of unclear significance. Once HIT is diagnosed, the high risk of thrombosis necessitates empiric anticoagulation with an antithrombin such as argatroban or lepirudin, or the heparinoid danaparoid. Additional agents under further study include the antithrombin bivalirudin and the pentasaccharide fondaparinux. Future issues in HIT include increasing awareness for HIT, improving the specificity of HIT testing and the development of new anticoagulants for HIT that will enable out-patient management.

Small-molecule direct antithrombins: argatroban

Argatroban represents the first antithrombin agent that was approved for clinical use. It belongs to the peptidomimetic (arginomimetic) group of drugs with multiple pharmacological properties. Unlike the other antithrombin drugs, such as hirudins and hirulogs, argatroban is a reversible antithrombin agent and therefore exhibits a considerably different pharmacological profile. Although argatroban is considered to be a member of the antithrombin family, its mechanisms of action include several other processes that have not been explored fully to date. These include the inhibition of non-thrombin serine proteases, a direct effect on endothelial cells and the vasculature (generation of nitric oxide), and downregulation of various inflammatory and thrombotic cytokines. Due to its lower molecular weight, argatroban is capable of passing through endovascular and cellular barriers and may, therefore, be more effective than heparins and hirudins in the antithrombotic management of microvascular disorders. Argatroban is an effective anticoagulant agent that produces a stronger anticoagulant effect than heparins and hirudins at equivalent anticoagulant levels, as measured by the activated clotting time (ACT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). At comparable ACT (300 seconds) and APTT (75-90 seconds), argatroban produces stronger inhibition of thrombin generation, as measured by in-vitro assays. Argatroban does not generate any neutralizing or non-neutralizing antibodies, and has predictable antithrombotic effects in different patients. In addition to the inhibition of thrombogenesis, argatroban also facilitates blood flow, inhibition of platelet activation and endothelial cell stimulation, mechanisms that are not necessarily related to thrombin inhibition. Despite these pharmacological advantages, additional clinical investigations are needed to validate the use of argatroban in clinical indications other than those for which it is currently approved, namely, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and support of percutaneous coronary angioplasty.

The Management of Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Who Require Anticoagulant Therapy

For patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), reexposure to heparin is generally not recommended. However, these patients are likely to require anticoagulation therapy at some point in the future. During acute HIT, when thrombocytopenia and anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies (or HIT antibodies) are present, therapy with heparin must be avoided. In patients with subacute HIT, when platelets have recovered but HIT antibodies are still present, therapy with heparin should be avoided. In patients with a remote history of HIT, when HIT antibodies have cleared, heparin reexposure may be safe, although recurrent HIT has been described in some patients. For all of these patients, the use of alternate anticoagulant agents, including direct thrombin inhibitors and anti-Xa agents, is preferable. There is an increasing amount of data supporting the use of these alternative agents in a wide variety of clinical circumstances, including thromboprophylaxis and treatment of acute thrombosis. Except for a few clinical situations, it is generally possible to avoid heparin reexposure in patients with a history of HIT.

Argatroban anticoagulation in patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

INTRODUCTION

Heparin therapy is not recommended for patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), except in specialized situations, because this treatment can lead to severe reactions including thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. However, the optimal management of patients with a history of HIT requiring acute anticoagulation has not yet been clarified because of the lack of prospective studies. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, as an anticoagulant in patients with a history of HIT needing acute anticoagulation.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with a history of serologically confirmed HIT were treated prospectively with argatroban [median (5th-95th percentile) dose of 2.0 (1.0-4.3) microg/kg/min for 4.0 (0.7-8.4) days]. Prospectively defined endpoints included successful anticoagulation (therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time), and bleeding, new thromboembolic events, or other adverse effects during therapy or within 30 days following its cessation.

RESULTS

All patients required acute anticoagulation with the most common admission diagnoses being deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (n=13) and chest pain or acute coronary syndrome (n=12). Eleven patients had previously received argatroban therapy for HIT; one patient underwent two treatment courses of argatroban for a history of HIT. The median (5th-95th percentile) time between the past diagnosis of HIT and initiation of argatroban was 7.5 (0.4-114.6) months. All evaluable patients were successfully anticoagulated. No patient had major bleeding, new thromboembolic events, or other adverse effects. There were no adverse events related to reexposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Argatroban can provide safe and effective anticoagulation, on initial or repeat exposure, in patients with a history of HIT.

Severe Argatroban-Induced Coagulopathy in a Patient With a History of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a serious complication of heparin therapy, and it remains a therapeutic challenge in the subset of patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Alternative anticoagulation strategies include lepirudin, danaparoid, bivalirudin, and argatroban, or a combination of unfractionated heparin with a platelet antagonist. Argatroban is eliminated by a hepatic route, making it a practical option for patients with renal insufficiency. However, the lack of an effective antidote poses a significant problem. We present a patient with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis who underwent a redo aortic valve replacement. Although the level of anticoagulation achieved with argatroban was initially adequate, its persistence after the completion of cardiopulmonary bypass proved to be life threatening.