Porcine cardiac bioprostheses: evaluation of long-term results in 990 patients

Ten-Year Results with Liotta Porcine Bioprostheses in the Mitral Position

The Liotta porcine bioprosthesis is a third generation bioprosthesis with a very low profile supraannular configuration with low-pressure glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue. Between May 1986 and December 1990, 670 patients underwent isolated mitral valve replacement with Liotta porcine bioprosthesis. There were 403 (60%) females and 267 (40%) males; the mean age was 39.03 ± 4.57 years (range, 16 to 75 years). The predominant lesion was combined mitral stenosis and mitral insufficiency in 46% of the patients. The operative mortality rate was 5.9% and the most frequent cause of the mortality was low cardiac output. Total follow-up was 3193.5 patient-years. The average follow-up period was 6.1 ± 2.5 years (range, 1 to 10 years). During the late period, 44 patients (1.4% per patient-year) died. The long-term survival estimate at 10 years was 84.8% ± 2.7%. Structural valve deterioration developed in 198 patients (6.2% per patient-year). Actuarial estimates of freedom from structural valve deterioration at 5 and 10 years were 87.6% ± 1.5% and 28.5% ± 4.5% and it was unrelated to sex or age. Most patients (88%) who developed bioprosthesis dysfunction underwent repeat valve replacement. The period between the implantation and development of structural valve deterioration was 5.9 ± 1.8 years for female patients and 6.2 ± 1.8 years for males (no statistically significant difference). We concluded from the early and high rates of structural valve deterioration in this young age group that the Liotta porcine bioprosthesis has limited long-term durability for mitral valve replacement.

Heparin in calcification prevention of porcine pericardial bioprostheses

Calcific degeneration is the main cause of failure of glutaraldehyde-treated xenograft heart valve substitutes implanted in humans. Coupling of heparin through an intermediate surface-bound substrate containing amino groups showed complete prevention of calcification of glutaraldehyde-treated porcine pericardium implanted subdermally in weanling rats for 5 months (heparin bonded pericardium: calcium, 0.625 +/- 0.24 mg g(-1); glutaraldehyde-only-treated pericardium: calcium, 228.32 +/- 37.39 mg g(-1); P < 0.0001). Conceivably, inactivation of unpaired aldehyde moieties present in bioprostheses after exposure to glutaraldehyde by amino compounds followed by blocking the potential binding sites of the graft with a surface modifying agent like heparin would be the key steps in the prevention of calcification and degeneration of glutaraldehyde-treated biological tissue grafts.

High risk of thromboemboli early after bioprosthetic cardiac valve replacement

OBJECTIVES

We studied the rate of thromboembolism in patients undergoing bioprosthetic replacement of the aortic or mitral valve, or both, at serial intervals after operation and the effects of anticoagulant or antiplatelet treatment and risk factors.

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolism appears to occur early after operation, but the incidence, timing and risk factors for thromboembolism and the role, timing, adequacy, effectiveness, duration and risk of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents are uncertain.

METHODS

The rate of thromboembolism was studied at three time intervals after operation (1 to 10, 11 to 90 and > 90 days) in 816 patients who underwent bioprosthetic replacement of the aortic or mitral valve, or both, at the Mayo Clinic from January 1975 to December 1982. The effect of antithrombotic therapy (warfarin, aspirin or dipyridamole, alone or in combination) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Median follow-up of surviving patients was 8.6 years. The rate of thromboembolism (%/year) decreased significantly (p < 0.01) at each time interval after operation (1 to 10, 11 to 90 and > 90 days) for mitral valve replacement (55%, 10% and 2.4%/year, respectively) and over the first time interval for aortic valve replacement (41%, 3.6% and 1.9%/year, respectively). During the first 10 days, 52% to 70% of prothrombin time ratios were low (< 1.5 x control). Patients with mitral valve replacement who received anticoagulation had a lower rate of thromboembolism for the entire follow-up period (2.5%/year with vs. 3.9%/year without anticoagulation, p = 0.05). Of 112 patients with a first thromboembolic episode, permanent disability occurred in 38% and death in 4%. Risk factors for emboli were lack of anticoagulation, mitral valve location, history of thromboembolism and increasing age. Only 10% of aortic, 44% of mitral and 17% of double valve recipients had anticoagulation at the time of an event. Patients with bleeding episodes (2.3%/year) were older and usually underwent anticoagulation. Blood transfusions were required in 60 of 111 patients (1.2%/year), and 13 patients (0.3%/year) died.

CONCLUSIONS

Thromboembolic risk was especially high for aortic and mitral valve replacement for 90 days after operation, and overall was increased with lack of anticoagulation, mitral valve location, previous thromboembolism and increasing age. Anticoagulation reduced thromboemboli and appears to be indicated in all patients as early as possible for 3 months and thereafter in those with risk factors, but needs prospective testing.

Interaction of age and coronary disease after valve replacement: implications for valve selection

The interaction of patient age and the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and its influence on survival were examined in 3,644 patients undergoing either aortic (AVR) or mitral (MVR) valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between 1974 and 1991. Emergency procedures were performed much more frequently in those undergoing MVR and CABG than in those undergoing AVR and CABG (18.8% and 6.7%, respectively). The adverse effect of CAD on median survival for patients of all ages undergoing either AVR or MVR was statistically significant (AVR without CAD 11.8 versus 8.7 years with CAD; MVR without CAD 12.7 versus 7.3 years with CAD; p < 0.0001). Survival in patients younger than 70 years without CABG who underwent either AVR or MVR was quite good (< 60 years: AVR, > 14 years; MVR, 15.4 years; 60 to 69 years: AVR, 10.4 years; MVR, 11.4 years). The most profound effect of CAD on patient survival after valve replacement was observed in patients 60 to 69 years of age who underwent MVR, in whom the median survival without CABG was 11.4 years versus 5.5 years with CABG (p < 0.0001). An emergency operative status was associated with a reduced early and late survival for those patients undergoing MVR, particularly those with CAD. By relating the Cox proportional hazard models for valve survival to patient survival, we found that, in those patients 70 years and older with and without CAD who underwent either AVR or MVR, the median patient survival was reduced sufficiently (5.5 versus 8.1 years) to justify use of a bioprosthetic valve.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Successful orthotopic transplantation of a fresh tricuspid valve homograft in a human

We report a successful transplantation of a human tricuspid valve in a human. We used a fresh tricuspid homograft with its chordae tendineae and papillary muscles, harvested 5 days earlier under sterile conditions from a multiorgan donor a few minutes after cardiectomy (the heart was not suitable for cardiac transplantation) and immediately stored at 4 degrees C. We elected to implant the homograft in a young heroin addict. Our experience demonstrates that the implantation of an atrioventricular homograft in the orthotopic position is technically feasible and can achieve good results, at least in the short term.

Reoperations on heart valve prostheses: an analysis of operative risks and late results

To evaluate risks and complications of reoperations on heart valve prostheses, we reviewed data on 183 patients who underwent reoperation because of prosthetic valve malfunction. The incremental effect of the redo procedure on hospital mortality and morbidity was studied by comparing primary and reoperative procedures and analyzing a series of possible predisposing factors. Late survival after first and second reoperations was computed, and possible determinants of late mortality were examined. Overall operative mortality was 8.7%; emergency operation (p = 0.0001), previous thromboembolism (p = 0.05), and advanced New York Heart Association functional class (p = 0.031) were the independent determinants. In a series of 1,355 patients having primary or secondary isolated valve replacement, the redo procedure was a significant risk factor in the univariate analysis (p = 0.025) but not in the multivariate analysis except for the subset of patients having mitral valve replacement (p = 0.052). The postoperative course was quite complicated, as evidenced by the long mean stay in the intensive care unit (mean stay, 3.8 days; longer than 2 days for 26% of the survivors). Nevertheless, postoperative complications were not significantly greater after a redo procedure than after a primary operation. Actuarial survival at 7 years was 57.3% +/- 8%. A comparison with a nonhomogeneous series from our institution did not demonstrate significant differences. In the subset of 16 patients having a second reoperation, late survival was 37.8% +/- 16% at 2 years. Advanced New York Heart Association class (p = 0.0001), double prosthetic valve dysfunction (p = 0.003), and any indication other than primary tissue failure (p = 0.06) were determinants of late mortality.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ten-year experience with the porcine bioprosthetic valve: interrelationship of valve survival and patient survival in 1,050 valve replacements

The porcine bioprosthetic valve was used in 440 patients having isolated mitral valve replacement (MVR), 522 patients having isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR), and 88 patients having MVR + AVR between 1974 and 1981. Patients with associated surgical procedures were excluded. Mean follow-up was 8.3 years. At 10 years, there was no difference in patient survival between those having AVR and those having MVR. Reoperations were performed on 192 patients. Endocarditis was the reason for reoperation in 3.7% of patients who had MVR and 10.6% of those who had AVR. Structural valve degeneration was the reason for reoperation in 89.7% of MVR patients and 78.8% of AVR patients (p = 0.04). Hospital mortality among patients having valve reoperations was 4.7%. At 10 years, the freedom from valve reoperation for all causes and from structural valve degeneration was significantly better for the AVR group than the MVR group (74% +/- 3% versus 61% +/- 4%, p = 0.004; and 79% +/- 3% versus 63% +/- 4%, p = 0.0006, respectively). For patients in their 60s, the 10-year freedom from reoperation was 92% +/- 2% for AVR and 80% +/- 6% for MVR (p = not significant). At 10 years, freedom from cardiac-related death and valve reoperation was best for both MVR and AVR patients in their 60s. Patients 70 years old or older rarely had reoperation but died before valve failure occurred. The 10-year freedom from all major valve-related events (cardiac-related death, reoperation, thromboembolism, endocarditis, and anticoagulant-related bleeding) was practically the same for both MVR and AVR patients (48% +/- 3% versus 49% +/- 3%, respectively). The porcine bioprosthetic valve is the valve of choice only for patients 60 years old or older. Patients in their 70s have an extremely low rate of reoperation but a high rate of cardiac-related death and do not outlive the prostheses.

The Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis: new generation low pressure glutaraldehyde fixed prosthesis

The Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis was implanted in 1,576 operations (1,536 patients with 1,704 valves) between 1981 and 1987. The mean age of the patients was 61.9 years (range 13 to 87 years). During the years 1981 and 1987, approximately 90% of the total valvular surgery population received the prosthesis. The early mortality was 7.0% (included patients with concomitant procedures including coronary artery bypass and ascending aortic aneurysm resection). Late mortality was 4.0% per patient-year. The total cumulative follow-up was 4,237 years. Thromboembolism (TE) was 2.4% per patient-year (fatal 0.4% per patient-year) (minor 1.2%; major 1.3%); antithromboembolic therapy-related hemorrhage (ATH) 0.5% (fatal 0.07%); prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) 0.5% (fatal 0.2%); periprosthetic leak (PPL) 0.3% (fatal 0%); clinical valve dysfunction (CVD) 0.3% (fatal 0.02%); and structural valve deterioration/primary tissue failure (SVD) 0.2%/patient-year (fatal 0%). Thromboembolism and structural valve deterioration were the significant complications, SVD occurring primarily between the fourth and fifth year of evaluation. The overall patient survival was 77.1% +/- 1.4% at five years. The patients were classified as 89.6% NYHA functional Class III and IV preoperatively and 96.1% Class I and II postoperatively. The freedom at five years from TE was 90.6% +/- 1.0%; SVD 98.9% +/- 0.5%; and reoperation 95.9% +/- 0.9%. Freedom from all valve-related complications at five years was 84.1% +/- 1.3%; valve-related mortality 96.8% +/- 0.7%; mortality and reoperation (valve failure) 92.9% +/- 1.1%; mortality and residual morbidity (treatment failure) 93.7% +/- 0.9%; and mortality, residual morbidity, and reoperation (valve failure and dysfunction) 90.0% +/- 1.2%. There were 28 valve-related deaths of a total 280 deaths (early 4, late 24) (TE 17; ATH 3; CVD 1; PVE 7; PPL 0; and SVD 0). Valve-related reoperations were performed in 32 patients (TE 2; CVD 4; PVE 7; PPL 11; and SVD 8). The supra-annular Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis has provided very satisfactory clinical performance and afforded patients an excellent quality of life. The long-term durability of this low pressure glutaraldehyde fixed prosthesis will be determined by observation over the next five to seven years.

The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: long-term evaluation of the high pressure glutaraldehyde fixed prosthesis

The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis was implanted in 1,000 operations (988 patients with 1,092 valves) between 1975 and 1981. The mean age of the patients was 56.8 years (range 8 to 85 years). During the years 1975 and 1981, approximately 97% of the total valvular surgery population received the prosthesis. The early mortality was 7.8% (including patients with concomitant procedures including coronary artery bypass and ascending aortic aneurysm resection). Late mortality was 3.8% per patient-year. The total cumulative follow-up was 5,937 years. Thromboembolism (TE) was 1.3% per patient-year (fatal 0.4%/patient-year) (minor 0.4%; major 0.9%); antithromboembolic therapy-related hemorrhage (ATH) 0.5% (fatal 0.1%); prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) 0.5% (fatal 0.2%); periprosthetic leak (PPL) 0.4% (fatal 0.2%); clinical valve dysfunction (CVD) 0.2% (fatal 0.02%); and structural valve deterioration (SVD)/primary tissue failure 1.6% per patient-year (fatal 0.2%/pt-yr). Thromboembolism and SVD occurring primarily between the sixth and tenth year of evaluation, were the significant complications. The overall patient survival was 60.5% +/- 2.4% at 10 years. The patients were classified as 93.5% NYHA functional Class III and IV, preoperatively and 93.1% Class I and II, postoperatively. The freedom at 10 years from TE was 82.9% +/- 2.7%; SVD 76.9% +/- 2.9%; and reoperation 70.8% +/- 3.1%. Freedom from all valve-related complications at 10 years was 54.3% +/- 3.1%; valve-related mortality 86.4% +/- 2.3%; mortality and reoperation (valve failure) 64.0% +/- 3.2%; mortality and residual morbidity (treatment failure) 82.3% +/- 2.6%; and mortality, residual morbidity, and reoperation (valve failure and dysfunction) 60.6% +/- 3.2%. There were 61 valve-related deaths of a total 352 deaths (early 7, late 54) (TE 21; ATH 7; CVD 1; PVE 12; PPL 9; and SVD 11). Valve-related reoperations were performed in 128 patients (TE 3; CVD 4; PVE 14; PPL 17; and SVD 90). The standard Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis has provided very satisfactory clinical performance and afforded patients excellent quality of life. Primary tissue failure is the significant long-term complication.

Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: primary tissue failure (structural valve deterioration) by age groups

Primary tissue failure (structural valve deterioration) has been documented as the most prominent complication of porcine bioprostheses. The influence of age on primary tissue failure has received limited consideration. From 1975 to 1986, 1,301 Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprostheses were implanted in 1,183 patients in 1,201 operations. Of the total number of prostheses, 97.7% were implanted prior to 1983. The mean follow-up was 5.6 years and was 97.5% complete. Primary tissue failure was identified in 96 patients (98 operations) at reoperation (95) or autopsy (3). One hundred four (104) prostheses were involved. Thirty-one failed after aortic valve replacement (AVR), 49 after mitral valve replacement (MVR), and 24 after multiple-valve replacement (18 patients). There were 47 male and 49 female patients. The mean age at implantation was 47 years (range, 8 to 72 years). The mean implantation time was 74.0 months. The freedom from primary tissue failure at 10 years is 77.0 +/- 2.9% overall; for AVR, 83.1 +/- 3.7%; for MVR, 72.1 +/- 4.9%; and for multiple-valve replacement, 65.5 +/- 7.8%. The freedom from deterioration for patients less than 20 years of age is significantly less than that for other age groups. The freedom from deterioration increased by decades; the greatest freedom was noted in patients 70 to 80 years old and 80 years old or older. The freedom from deterioration at 10 years for patients less than 30 years of age is 26.8 +/- 17.2%; 30 to 59 years, 77.4 +/- 3.0%; and 60 years and older, 83.1 +/- 4.2%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Intrinsic failure of Hancock mitral bioprostheses: 10- to 15-year experience

Hancock porcine bioprostheses have been implanted in the mitral position at the National Institutes of Health since July, 1970. Eight models (330, 330A, 330B, 330C, 332, 340, 341, and 342) were used during a 54-month period ending December, 1974, and 100 consecutive surviving patients were evaluated for subsequent bioprosthetic valve failure and prosthesis-related complications by annual clinic examinations and serial hemodynamic studies. Actuarial patient survival was 76 +/- 4%, 51 +/- 5%, and 30 +/- 6% after 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Intrinsic valve failure, defined as structural degeneration of bioprosthetic tissue or stent geometry alteration or both, in the absence of prior infection, occurred in 23 patients. The linear occurrence rate of bioprosthetic valve failure was 0.2%, 5%, and 15% per patient-year, and it affected 1 patient, 14 patients, and 8 patients at sequential 5-year milestones. The actuarial freedom from valve failure was 99 +/- 1%, 75 +/- 6%, 58 +/- 8%, and 40 +/- 12% after 5, 10, 12, and 14 years, respectively. The valve durability of early Hancock bioprostheses (models 330 through 341; N = 39) was not appreciably different from that of the current model 342 valves (N = 61). However, an increased incidence of intrinsic valve failure was observed for the first polypropylene-stented valve type (model 330) compared with the currently available model 342 valve (8/16, 50%, versus 12/61, 20%; p = 0.034). The yearly occurrence rate of prosthesis-related complications remained constant, but the rate of intrinsic valve failure increased in a progressive, nonlinear fashion. The high intrinsic failure rate of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis after 10 to 12 years has moderated our initial enthusiasm for this valve in the mitral position, and has resulted in more frequent implantations of mechanical valve substitutes at this institution.

[Aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis--which type of prosthesis?]

308 patients after aortic valve replacement by bio-prostheses were evaluated by questionnaire. The aim of the study was to estimate factors of risk for morbidity, which could be referred to the different xenogenic valve materials. After an average period of 41 months there was no statistical difference in postoperative status, such as exercise capacity, rate of survival and of freedom from thromboembolic events or repeat surgery. Although results of the early and intermediate postoperative period are satisfying with both types of valve prostheses a longer period of observation is required to draw distinct conclusions for xenogenic material related complications.

Thrombotic and bleeding complications of prosthetic heart valves

A review of articles published since 1979 indicates that thrombotic and bleeding complications account for about 50% of valve-related complications in patients with bioprosthetic aortic and mitral valves and for approximately 75% of the complications in patients with mechanical valves. Although compromised by lack of standard definitions and by variability in reporting and follow-up, the data suggest that the linearized rate of both thrombotic and bleeding complications in patients with aortic bioprostheses is approximately half that for aortic mechanical prostheses (2% versus 4%), but is approximately equal for both bioprostheses and mechanical valves in the mitral position (approximately 4%), and for mechanical and bioprosthetic aortic and mitral valves in combination. However, linearized rates for fatal thrombotic and bleeding events are two to four times higher in patients with mechanical prostheses. The adequacy of warfarin anticoagulation is the most important factor affecting thrombotic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical valves and over shadows the dubious importance of other phenomena such as atrial fibrillation and left atrial thrombus. Short-term warfarin anticoagulation or the use of long-term platelet inhibitors, or both, do not appear to reduce the incidence of thrombotic complications in patients with aortic bioprostheses but increase bleeding. For mitral bioprostheses, the postoperative use of warfarin for three months or aspirin indefinitely is as effective in preventing thromboembolism as long-term warfarin. Acute prosthetic valve endocarditis is associated with a 13 to 40% incidence of thrombotic complications. Likewise, the recurrence rate of cerebral emboli is high (20-30%) in patients with prosthetic valves who are not anticoagulated. Bioprostheses are strongly preferred for women who wish to bear children; fetal wastage occurs in 25 to 30% of pregnant women with mechanical heart valves who receive either warfarin or heparin, or a combination of the two. Heparin, however, greatly increases the risk of maternal bleeding. In children, the efficacy of platelet inhibitors without warfarin anticoagulation is unproven; nearly all serious strokes occur when warfarin is omitted; and permanent disability from warfarin-related bleeding is rare. All prosthetic cardiac valves initiate coagulation and affect the dynamic equilibrium between activated procoagulants and endogenous anticoagulants. Warfarin is the only available oral exogenous anticoagulant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A tri-institutional comparison of tissue and mechanical values using a patient-oriented definition of "treatment failure"

Selection of valve type for predominant usage is obscured by limiting the analysis to prosthesis-related rather than patient-oriented failure modes. In this report, "treatment failure" is defined as a valve-related death or permanent patient disability; successful reoperations are excluded, and emboli with permanent residua are included. Results with the Starr-Edwards Silastic ball valve (Oregon) and the Hancock (Stanford) and Carpentier-Edwards (Vancouver) porcine valves are compared using this new definition of treatment failure. Evaluated according to structural failure, the mechanical valve is superior to the tissue valve, and using the Stanford definition of valve failure, it becomes so between 5 and 10 years. Using treatment failure, tissue valves are superior at 5 years; at 10 years in the aortic position, the results are comparable; and in the mitral position at 8 to 10 years, tissue valves show a continued but small advantage.

Antithrombotic therapy in patients with valvular heart disease and prosthetic heart valves

Indications and the type of antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with valvular heart disease, mechanical prosthetic heart valves and bioprosthetic heart valves are discussed. The evidence for these clinical recommendations is described and graded into five levels. The indications for anticoagulation in patients with valvular heart disease are chronic or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, sinus rhythm with a very large left atrium, severe left ventricular dysfunction or presence of heart failure or a history of previous thromboembolism. Anticoagulant therapy is administered to prolong the prothrombin time to 1.5 to 2.0 times control, using rabbit brain thromboplastin (standardized international normalized ratio = 3.0 to 4.5). Risk factors for thromboembolism in patients with prosthetic heart valves are discussed. Because intracardiac thrombus formation may start during and continues early after operation, restarting heparin therapy 6 hours after operation and continuing it for the duration of the hospitalization is advised. For mechanical prosthetic heart valves, oral anticoagulation as outlined plus dipyridamole is advised indefinitely. Platelet inhibitor therapy alone is insufficient. For bioprosthetic heart valves, heparin is followed by oral anticoagulation as outlined for 3 months after mitral or aortic valve replacement and indefinitely after mitral valve replacement if there is atrial fibrillation or a very large left atrium; aspirin may be recommended indefinitely after aortic valve replacement. Antithrombotic therapy is also considered for four special situations: noncardiac surgery, prosthetic valve endocarditis, anticoagulation after a thromboembolic event, and antithrombotic therapy during pregnancy.

Mitral replacement: clinical experience with a ball-valve prosthesis. Twenty-five years later

The purpose of this report is to review the results of mitral valve replacement since a first report in the Annals of Surgery in 1961, in order to determine the relative importance of new valve designs versus other surgical variables. The continued use of the silastic ball valve in its 1966 configuration (Model 6120), by providing a comparative data base for other new prosthetic valves, allows this analysis. For a valid comparison with the tilting disc (Bjork-Shiley) and the porcine (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) valves, only results with the silastic ball valves implanted during comparable time frames should be used. (Formula: see text) Thus, there are no significant differences in the results obtained with the silastic ball valve in time frames comparable to other contemporary valves introduced in the early 1970s. Improved results, therefore, must be non-prosthetic valve related.