Ex vivo evaluation of stored lungs

Technical Advances Targeting Multiday Preservation of Isolated Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion

Indications for ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) have evolved from assessment of questionable donor lungs to treatment of some pathologies and the logistics. Yet up to 3 quarters of donor lungs remain discarded across the globe. Multiday preservation of discarded human lungs on EVLP platforms would improve donor lung utilization rates via application of sophisticated treatment modalities, which could eventually result in zero waitlist mortality. The purpose of this article is to summarize advances made on the technical aspects of the protocols in achieving a stable multiday preservation of isolated EVLP. Based on the evidence derived from large animal and/or human studies, the following advances have been considered important in achieving this goal: ability to reposition donor lungs during EVLP; perfusate adsorption/filtration modalities; perfusate enrichment with plasma and/or donor whole blood, nutrients, vitamins, and amino acids; low-flow, pulsatile, and subnormothermic perfusion; positive outflow pressure; injury specific personalized ventilation strategies; and negative pressure ventilation. Combination of some of these advances in an automatized EVLP device capable of managing perfusate biochemistry and ventilation would likely speed up the processes of achieving multiday preservation of isolated EVLP.

Ex vivo lung perfusion and the Organ Care System: a review

With the increasing prevalence of heart failure and end-stage lung disease, there is a sustained interest in expanding the donor pool to alleviate the thoracic organ shortage crisis. Efforts to extend the standard donor criteria and to include donation after circulatory death have been made to increase the availability of suitable organs. Studies have demonstrated that outcomes with extended-criteria donors are comparable to those with standard-criteria donors. Another promising approach to augment the donor pool is the improvement of organ preservation techniques. Both ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) for the lungs and the Organ Care System (OCS, TransMedics) for the heart have shown encouraging results in preserving organs and extending ischemia time through the application of normothermic regional perfusion. EVLP has been effective in improving marginal or borderline lungs by preserving and reconditioning them. The use of OCS is associated with excellent short-term outcomes for cardiac allografts and has improved utilization rates of hearts from extended-criteria donors. While both EVLP and OCS have successfully transitioned from research to clinical practice, the costs associated with commercially available systems and consumables must be considered. The ex vivo perfusion platform, which includes both EVLP and OCS, holds the potential for diverse and innovative therapies, thereby transforming the landscape of thoracic organ transplantation.

Epidemiology and Long-Term Outcomes in Thoracic Transplantation

Over the past five decades, outcomes for lung transplantation have significantly improved in the early post-operative period, such that lung transplant is now the gold standard treatment for end-stage respiratory disease. The major limitation that impacts lung transplant survival rates is the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD affects around 50% of lung transplant recipients within five years of transplantation. We must also consider other factors impacting the survival rate such as the surgical technique (single versus double lung transplant), along with donor and recipient characteristics. The future is promising, with more research looking into ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) and bioengineered lungs, with the hope of increasing the donor pool and decreasing the risk of graft rejection.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications of Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in Lung Transplantation: Potential Benefits and Inherent Limitations

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), a technique in which isolated lungs are continually ventilated and perfused at normothermic temperature, is emerging as a promising platform to optimize donor lung quality and increase the lung graft pool. Over the past few decades, the EVLP technique has become recognized as a significant achievement and gained much attention in the field of lung transplantation. EVLP has been demonstrated to be an effective platform for various targeted therapies to optimize donor lung function before transplantation. Additionally, some physical parameters during EVLP and biological markers in the EVLP perfusate can be used to evaluate graft function before transplantation and predict posttransplant outcomes. However, despite its advantages, the clinical practice of EVLP continuously encounters multiple challenges associated with both intrinsic and extrinsic limitations. It is of utmost importance to address the advantages and disadvantages of EVLP for its broader clinical usage. Here, the pros and cons of EVLP are comprehensively discussed, with a focus on its benefits and potential approaches for overcoming the remaining limitations. Directions for future research to fully explore the clinical potential of EVLP in lung transplantation are also discussed.

Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion: A Review of Current and Future Application in Lung Transplantation

The number of waitlisted lung transplant candidates exceeds the availability of donor organs. Barriers to utilization of donor lungs include suboptimal lung allograft function, long ischemic times due to geographical distance between donor and recipient, and a wide array of other logistical and medical challenges. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a modality that allows donor lungs to be evaluated in a closed circuit outside of the body and extends lung donor assessment prior to final acceptance for transplantation. EVLP was first utilized successfully in 2001 in Lund, Sweden. Since its initial use, EVLP has facilitated hundreds of lung transplants that would not have otherwise happened. EVLP technology continues to evolve and improve, and currently there are multiple commercially available systems, and more under investigation worldwide. Although barriers to universal utilization of EVLP exist, the possibility for more widespread adaptation of this technology abounds. Not only does EVLP have diagnostic capabilities as an organ monitoring device but also the therapeutic potential to improve lung allograft quality when specific issues are encountered. Expanded treatment potential includes the use of immunomodulatory treatment to reduce primary graft dysfunction, as well as targeted antimicrobial therapy to treat infection. In this review, we will highlight the historical development, the current state of utilization/capability, and the future promise of this technology.

In vitro and ex vivo models in inhalation biopharmaceutical research - advances, challenges and future perspectives

Oral inhalation results in pulmonary drug targeting and thereby reduces systemic side effects, making it the preferred means of drug delivery for the treatment of respiratory disorders such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or cystic fibrosis. In addition, the high alveolar surface area, relatively low enzymatic activity and rich blood supply of the distal airspaces offer a promising pathway to the systemic circulation. This is particularly advantageous when a rapid onset of pharmacological action is desired or when the drug is suffering from stability issues or poor biopharmaceutical performance following oral administration. Several cell and tissue-based in vitro and ex vivo models have been developed over the years, with the intention to realistically mimic pulmonary biological barriers. It is the aim of this review to critically discuss the available models regarding their advantages and limitations and to elaborate further which biopharmaceutical questions can and cannot be answered using the existing models.

Ex vivo lung perfusion: how we do it

Lung transplantation is an established treatment for patients with end-stage lung disease. However, a shortage of donors, low lung utilization among potential donors, and waitlist mortality continue to be challenges. In the last decade, ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has expanded the donor pool by allowing prolonged evaluation of marginal donor lungs and allowing reparative therapies for lungs, which are otherwise considered not transplantable. In this review, we describe in detail our experience with EVLP including our workflow, setup, operative technique, and protocols. Our multidisciplinary EVLP program functions with the collaboration of surgeons, pulmonologists, and EVLP nurses who run the pump. EVLP program has been a valuable addition to our program. Since Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2019, we experienced incremental increased lung transplant volume of 12% annually.

Lung Transplantation, Pulmonary Endothelial Inflammation, and Ex-Situ Lung Perfusion: A Review

Lung transplantation (LTx) is the gold standard treatment for end-stage lung disease; however, waitlist mortality remains high due to a shortage of suitable donor lungs. Organ quality can be compromised by lung ischemic reperfusion injury (LIRI). LIRI causes pulmonary endothelial inflammation and may lead to primary graft dysfunction (PGD). PGD is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality post-LTx. Research into preservation strategies that decrease the risk of LIRI and PGD is needed, and ex-situ lung perfusion (ESLP) is the foremost technological advancement in this field. This review addresses three major topics in the field of LTx: first, we review the clinical manifestation of LIRI post-LTx; second, we discuss the pathophysiology of LIRI that leads to pulmonary endothelial inflammation and PGD; and third, we present the role of ESLP as a therapeutic vehicle to mitigate this physiologic insult, increase the rates of donor organ utilization, and improve patient outcomes.

Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion: Current Achievements and Future Directions

There is a severe shortage in the availability of donor organs for lung transplantation. Novel strategies are needed to optimize usage of available organs to address the growing global needs. Ex vivo lung perfusion has emerged as a powerful tool for the assessment, rehabilitation, and optimization of donor lungs before transplantation. In this review, we discuss the history of ex vivo lung perfusion, current evidence on its use for standard and extended criteria donors, and consider the exciting future opportunities that this technology provides for lung transplantation.

Implementation of an experimental isolated lung perfusion model on surgically resected human lobes

Isolated lung perfusion (ILP) is an ideal model to study treatment effects on a variety of pathologies. As published research mostly relies on rejected donor lungs or animal organs, this study investigates the use of surgically resected human lobes as an alternative and novel model for personalized experimental research. Ten surgically resected lobes were perfused in acellular and normothermic condition. The indication for surgery was lung cancer. Perfusion and ventilation were adapted to the size of the lobes and both functional and metabolic parameters were assessed during ILP. Patients (age 67.5 y (59–81)|♀n = 3|♂n = 7) underwent anatomic pulmonary lobectomy. Ischemic time between arterial ligation and ILP was 226 minutes (161–525). Median duration of ILP was 135 (87–366) minutes. Gas exchange and mechanical respiratory parameters remained steady during ILP (pulmonary venous pO₂ 196(151–219) mmHg | peak AWP: 14.5(11–22) cmH₂O). Metabolism stayed constant during ILP (Glucose consumption: 1.86 mg/min/L_TLC (95%CI: −2.09 to −1.63) | lactate production: 0.005 mmol/min/ L_TLC (95%CI: 0.004 to 0.007)). ILP of surgically resected human lobes is a feasible and promising method. By maintaining a near physiological setting, this model may pave the way for future experimental lung research including cancer research, transplantation, physiology, pharmacology and mechanical ventilation.

Evaluation and reconditioning of donor organs for transplantation through ex vivo lung perfusion

Objective:

To assess the feasibility and impact of ex vivo lung perfusion with hyperoncotic solution (Steen Solution^™) in the utilization of these organs in Brazil.

Methods:

In this prospective study, we subjected five lungs considered to be high risk for transplantation to 4 hours of ex vivo lung perfusion, with evaluation of oxygenation capacity. High-risk donor lungs were defined by specific criteria, including inflammatory infiltrates, pulmonary edema and partial pressure of arterial oxygen less than 300mmHg (inspired oxygen fraction of 100%).

Results:

During reperfusion, the mean partial pressure of arterial oxygen (inspired oxygen fraction of 100%) of the lungs did not change significantly (p=0.315). In the first hour, the mean partial pressure of arterial oxygen was 302.7mmHg (±127.66mmHg); in the second hour, 214.2mmHg (±94.12mmHg); in the third hour, 214.4mmHg (±99.70mmHg); and in the fourth hour, 217.7mmHg (±73.93mmHg). Plasma levels of lactate and glucose remained stable during perfusion, with no statistical difference between the moments studied (p=0.216).

Conclusion:

Ex vivo lung perfusion was reproduced in our center and ensured the preservation of lungs during the study period, which was 4 hours. The technique did not provide enough improvement for indicating organs for transplantation; therefore, it did not impact on use of these organs.

Organ preservation: from the past to the future

Organ transplantation is the most effective therapy for patients with end-stage disease. Preservation solutions and techniques are crucial for donor organ quality, which is directly related to morbidity and survival after transplantation. Currently, static cold storage (SCS) is the standard method for organ preservation. However, preservation time with SCS is limited as prolonged cold storage increases the risk of early graft dysfunction that contributes to chronic complications. Furthermore, the growing demand for the use of marginal donor organs requires methods for organ assessment and repair. Machine perfusion has resurfaced and dominates current research on organ preservation. It is credited to its dynamic nature and physiological-like environment. The development of more sophisticated machine perfusion techniques and better perfusates may lead to organ repair/reconditioning. This review describes the history of organ preservation, summarizes the progresses that has been made to date, and discusses future directions for organ preservation.

Machine perfusion of thoracic organs

This article summarizes recent knowledge and clinical advances in machine perfusion (MP) of thoracic organs. MP of thoracic organs has gained much attention during the last decade. Clinical studies are investigating the role of MP to preserve, resuscitate, and assess heart and lungs prior to transplantation. Currently, MP of the cardiac allograft is essential in all type DCD heart transplantation while MP of the pulmonary allograft is mandatory in uncontrolled DCD lung transplantation. MP of thoracic organs also offers an exciting platform to further investigate downregulation of the innate and adaptive immunity prior to reperfusion of the allograft in recipients. MP provides a promising technology that allows pre-transplant preservation, resuscitation, assessment, repair, and conditioning of cardiac and pulmonary allografts outside the body in a near physiologic state prior to planned transplantation. Results of ongoing clinical trials are awaited to estimate the true clinical value of this new technology in advancing the field of heart and lung transplantation by increasing the total number and the quality of available organs and by further improving recipient early and long-term outcome.

An observational study of Donor Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in UK lung transplantation: DEVELOP-UK

BACKGROUND

Many patients awaiting lung transplantation die before a donor organ becomes available. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) allows initially unusable donor lungs to be assessed and reconditioned for clinical use.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the Donor Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in UK lung transplantation study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of EVLP in increasing UK lung transplant activity.

DESIGN

A multicentre, unblinded, non-randomised, non-inferiority observational study to compare transplant outcomes between EVLP-assessed and standard donor lungs.

SETTING

Multicentre study involving all five UK officially designated NHS adult lung transplant centres.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years with advanced lung disease accepted onto the lung transplant waiting list.

INTERVENTION

The study intervention was EVLP assessment of donor lungs before determining suitability for transplantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was survival during the first 12 months following lung transplantation. Secondary outcome measures were patient-centred outcomes that are influenced by the effectiveness of lung transplantation and that contribute to the health-care costs.

RESULTS

Lungs from 53 donors unsuitable for standard transplant were assessed with EVLP, of which 18 (34%) were subsequently transplanted. A total of 184 participants received standard donor lungs. Owing to the early closure of the study, a non-inferiority analysis was not conducted. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival at 12 months was 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 0.83] for the EVLP arm and 0.80 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.85) for the standard arm. The hazard ratio for overall 12-month survival in the EVLP arm relative to the standard arm was 1.96 (95% CI 0.83 to 4.67). Patients in the EVLP arm required ventilation for a longer period and stayed longer in an intensive therapy unit (ITU) than patients in the standard arm, but duration of overall hospital stay was similar in both groups. There was a higher rate of very early grade 3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD) in the EVLP arm, but rates of PGD did not differ between groups after 72 hours. The requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support was higher in the EVLP arm (7/18, 38.8%) than in the standard arm (6/184, 3.2%). There were no major differences in rates of chest radiograph abnormalities, infection, lung function or rejection by 12 months. The cost of EVLP transplants is approximately £35,000 higher than the cost of standard transplants, as a result of the cost of the EVLP procedure, and the increased ECMO use and ITU stay. Predictors of cost were quality of life on joining the waiting list, type of transplant and number of lungs transplanted. An exploratory model comparing a NHS lung transplant service that includes EVLP and standard lung transplants with one including only standard lung transplants resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £73,000. Interviews showed that patients had a good understanding of the need for, and the processes of, EVLP. If EVLP can increase the number of usable donor lungs and reduce waiting, it is likely to be acceptable to those waiting for lung transplantation. Study limitations include small numbers in the EVLP arm, limiting analysis to descriptive statistics and the EVLP protocol change during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, one-third of donor lungs subjected to EVLP were deemed suitable for transplant. Estimated survival over 12 months was lower than in the standard group, but the data were also consistent with no difference in survival between groups. Patients receiving these additional transplants experience a higher rate of early graft injury and need for unplanned ECMO support, at increased cost. The small number of participants in the EVLP arm because of early study termination limits the robustness of these conclusions. The reason for the increased PGD rates, high ECMO requirement and possible differences in lung injury between EVLP protocols needs evaluation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN44922411.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 85. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

History of lung transplantation

Lung transplantation nowadays is a well-accepted and routine treatment for well selected patients with terminal respiratory disease. However, it took several decades of experimental studies and clinical attempts to reach this success. In this paper, we describe the early experimental activity from the mid-forties until the early sixties. The first clinical attempt in humans was reported by Hardy and Webb in 1963 followed by others with short survival only except for one case by Derom et al. who lived for 10 months. Long-term successes were not reported until after the discovery of cyclosporine as a new immunosuppressive agent. Successful heart-lung transplantation (HLTx) for pulmonary vascular disease was performed by the Stanford group starting in 1981 while the Toronto group described good outcome after single-lung transplantation (SLTx) for pulmonary fibrosis in 1983 and after double-lung transplantation for emphysema in 1986. Further evolution in surgical techniques and in transplant type for the various forms of end-stage lung diseases are reviewed. The evolution in lung transplantation still continues nowadays with the use of pulmonary allografts coming from living-related donors, from donors after circulatory death, or after prior assessment and reconditioning during ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) in an attempt to overcome the critical shortage of suitable organs. Early outcome has significantly improved over the last three decades. Better treatment and prevention of chronic lung allograft dysfunction will hopefully result in further improvement of long-term survival after lung transplantation.

Novel Technologies for Isolated Lung Perfusion: Beyond Lung Transplant

Isolated lung perfusion (ILP) has been examined and developed in lung transplantation and thoracic oncology research. In lung transplantation, ILP has been used to assess physiologic integrity of donor lungs after removal from the donor, and it has also been proposed as a method for active treatment and repair of injured unsuitable donor organs ex vivo. ILP is attractive as a concept to deliver high-dose chemotherapy to treat pulmonary metastatic disease, referred to as in vivo lung perfusion. This article focuses on the rationale, technical aspects, and experimental and clinical experience of in vivo lung perfusion. A perspective on the future application of these techniques is described.

Ex vivo lung perfusion

Lung transplantation is an established life-saving therapy for patients with end-stage lung disease. Unfortunately, greater success in lung transplantation is hindered by a shortage of lung donors and the relatively poor early-, mid-, and long-term outcomes associated with severe primary graft dysfunction. Ex vivo lung perfusion has emerged as a modern preservation technique that allows for a more accurate lung assessment and improvement in lung quality. This review outlines the: (i) rationale behind the method; (ii) techniques and protocols; (iii) Toronto ex vivo lung perfusion method; (iv) devices available; and (v) clinical experience worldwide. We also highlight the potential of ex vivo lung perfusion in leading a new era of lung preservation.

Strategies for safe donor expansion: donor management, donations after cardiac death, ex-vivo lung perfusion

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The number of patients listed for lung transplantation largely exceeds the number of available transplantable organs because of both a shortage of organ donors and a low utilization rate of lungs from those donors. Two major innovations in recent years include the use of lungs from donations after cardiac death (DCD) and the use of ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) to assess and improve injured donor lungs.

RECENT FINDINGS

DCD lung transplants now account for about 20% of lung transplants in many centres and outcomes after transplantation have been excellent with this source of donation. Clinical experience using EVLP has shown the method to be well tolerated and allow for reassessment and improvement in function from high-risk donor lungs. When these lungs were transplanted, low rates of primary graft dysfunction were achieved and long-term survival was comparable with standard transplantation. Preclinical studies have shown a great potential of EVLP as a platform for the delivery of novel therapies to repair injured donor lungs.

SUMMARY

A significant increase on the number of available lungs for transplantation is expected in the coming years with the wider use of DCD lungs and with organ-specific ex-vivo treatment strategies.

Ex vivo lung perfusion to improve donor lung function and increase the number of organs available for transplantation

This paper describes the initial clinical experience of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) at the Fondazione Ca’ Granda in Milan between January 2011 and May 2013. EVLP was considered if donor PaO₂/FiO₂ was below 300 mmHg or if lung function was doubtful. Donors with massive lung contusion, aspiration, purulent secretions, pneumonia, or sepsis were excluded. EVLP was run with a low-flow, open atrium and low hematocrit technique. Thirty-five lung transplants from brain death donors were performed, seven of which after EVLP. EVLP donors were older (54 ± 9 years vs. 40 ± 15 years, EVLP versus Standard, P < 0.05), had lower PaO₂/FiO₂ (264 ± 78 mmHg vs. 453 ± 119 mmHg, P < 0.05), and more chest X-ray abnormalities (P < 0.05). EVLP recipients were more often admitted to intensive care unit as urgent cases (57% vs. 18%, P = 0.05); lung allocation score at transplantation was higher (79 [40–84] vs. 39 [36–46], P < 0.05). After transplantation, primary graft dysfunction (PGD₇₂ grade 3, 32% vs. 28%, EVLP versus Standard, P = 1), mortality at 30 days (0% vs. 0%, P = 1), and overall survival (71% vs. 86%, EVLP versus Standard P = 0.27) were not different between groups. EVLP enabled a 20% increase in available donor organs and resulted in successful transplants with lungs that would have otherwise been rejected (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01967953).

Machine perfusion in organ transplantation: a tool for ex-vivo graft conditioning with mesenchymal stem cells?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Machine perfusion has emerged as a tool to evaluate pretransplant graft function more objectively during preservation. Machine perfusion also offers the possibility to recondition questionable organs and to 'immunomodulate' allografts ex vivo. This article aims to review the current knowledge on machine perfusion of the various solid thoracic and abdominal organs, and to discuss the new possibility of conditioning and treating grafts with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) during machine perfusion.

RECENT FINDINGS

Different methods of machine perfusion have been described varying among organs in temperature and composition of perfusate. Commercial devices have recently become available for machine perfusion of all organs, with the largest clinical experience acquired in kidney and lung transplantation. Clinical studies are ongoing for liver, heart, and pancreas. MSC therapy in organ transplantation is now emerging with clinical studies set up to investigate its potential to attenuate ischemia/reperfusion injury (innate immunity) and to downregulate the alloimmune response (adaptive immunity) and promote engraftment after transplantation. We hypothesize that delivery of MSCs directly into the machine perfusion circuit may provide a unique opportunity to treat and immunomodulate organs prior to transplantation. To our knowledge, no study on ex-vivo delivery of MSCs during machine perfusion has been reported.

SUMMARY

Machine perfusion of solid organs has regained much attention during the last decade. It provides a new promising tool that may allow pretransplant ex-vivo assessment, preservation, repair, and conditioning of grafts. Experimental research and clinical trials testing the administration of MSCs during machine perfusion are warranted to explore the potential benefit and mechanisms of this approach.

The clinical potential of ex vivo lung perfusion

The number of patients listed for lung transplantation largely exceeds the number of available transplantable organs because of both a shortage of organ donors and a low utilization rate of donor lungs. Normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a method that maintains the organ in physiologically protective conditions outside the body during preservation, and shows great promise to increase utilization of donor lungs by allowing more accurate evaluation, as well as treatment and repair, of damaged donor lungs prior to transplantation. This article will cover the rationale, technical details and results of experimental and clinical studies with EVLP. The significant potential applications of EVLP in lung transplantation, lung regeneration and oncology are discussed.

Lung preservation techniques

Some of the barriers to successful lung transplantation include the lack of acceptable methods for ischemic protection and the absence of reliable systems for preservation. The lung response to 60 minutes of warm ischemia basically consists of alveolar-capillary edema and disruption, mitochondria swelling, interstitial hemorrhage, significantly depressed pulmonary function, elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance, and considerable drop in levels of glucose, phospholipids, and adenosine triphosphate. The tolerance to warm ischemia increases to several hours with the use of different systems of ventilatory assistance with or without positive end-expiratory pressure. Several methods of preservation have been attempted: hypothermia, hyperbaria, and hypothermic pulsatile or nonpulsatile perfusion. Hypothermic pulsatile perfusion appears to offer longer periods of protection than the other methods. Longer periods of ischemia and extended preservation may be made possible by advances in the use of drug protection during warm ischemia and the utilization of intracellular colloid or noncolloid solutions for hypothermic storage or hypothermic pulsatile perfusion.