T4 lung tumors with infiltration of the thoracic aorta: is an operation reasonable?

T4 Lung Carcinoma with Infiltration of the Thoracic Aorta: Indication and Surgical Procedure

Lung carcinomas infiltrate the aorta mostly on the left side and are altogether rare. As an initial step, complete staging is performed and the results are evaluated in an interdisciplinary tumor board. If the patient's general condition including cardiopulmonary reserves is sufficient, and if there is neither distant metastasis nor an N2 situation, surgical resection may be indicated. The option for neoadjuvant chemotherapy should always be taken into consideration. Depending on the anatomic tumor location, partial lung resection and resection of the affected aortic wall are performed employing a cardiopulmonary bypass. The resected aortic wall is replaced by a vascular prosthesis. In recent years, this proven procedure has partly been replaced by an alternative one, avoiding extracorporeal circulation. An endoaortic stent is implanted in the affected area followed by partial lung resection and resection of the diseased aortic wall. This new procedure has significantly reduced perioperative mortality and morbidity. With proper patient selection, long-term survival can be improved even in this complex malignoma.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of primary pulmonary rhabdomyosarcoma in middle-aged and elderly patients: a case report and literature review

To date, only 34 cases of primary pulmonary rhabdomyosarcoma (PPRMS) in the middle-aged and elderly population have been published. However, analyses of the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of PPRMS in this population have not been performed. A 75-year-old man visited our hospital because of abdominal pain and discomfort. His serum lactate dehydrogenase, neuron specific enolase, and progastrin-releasing peptide levels were elevated. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography revealed a lobulated mass of 7.6 × 5.5 cm² in the lower lobe of the left lung with abnormally high fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose metabolism. Histologically, the tumor cells were small with little cytoplasm, deep nuclear staining, and heavily stained nuclear chromatin. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for desmin, MyoD1 myogenin, synaptophysin, and CD56. Cytogenetic analysis for FOXO1A translocation was negative. Finally, the patient was diagnosed with PPRMS. He received combined chemotherapy with vincristine 1 mg, actinomycin 0.4 mg, cyclophosphamide 0.8 mg; however, only one course of chemotherapy was completed, and the patient died 2 months after diagnosis. PPRMS in middle-aged and elderly people is a highly malignant soft tissue tumor with significant clinicopathological characteristics.

Endovascular Surgery of Descending Thoracic Aorta Involved in T4 Lung Tumor

PURPOSE

Surgical treatment of primary lung T4 tumors is controversial especially when the cancer invades the mediastinal structures or the descending thoracic aorta. Conventional surgical treatment is associated with a high perioperative mortality and morbidity rate. Thoracic EndoVascular Aortic Repair has emerged as a valid off-label alternative to conventional surgery. We aimed to assess perioperative and midterm aortic-related outcome of patients who have undergone aortic stent-graft implantation, followed by en bloc surgical treatment of the involved aorta and lung cancer resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 2017 to May 2020, we treated 5 patients diagnosed with a T4 lung cancer by the involvement of the descending thoracic aorta. When only the descending thoracic aorta is involved, a 2-stage procedure was considered, with aortic stent-graft implantation performed before tumor resection. One-stage strategy, with stent-graft implantation carried out before thoracotomy, was preferred for patients with the involvement of cardiac and/or other vascular mediastinal structures.

RESULTS

The mean age was 58.4 ± 6.2 years. All patients were affected by non-small cell lung cancer. All 5 patients required a single stent-graft to completely cover the involved segment of aorta. Four patients underwent a 2-stage procedure. One patient, with the involvement of the left inferior pulmonary vein, required a 1-stage en bloc resection of the left lower lobe, aortic wall adventitia, left inferior pulmonary vein, and reconstruction of the left atrial wall. Primary procedural success was achieved in all. At follow-up, no patient developed aortic-related complications. One patient died 2 years after surgery, due to local recurrence of the tumor.

CONCLUSION

T4 lung resection combined with aortic stent-graft implantation can be safely performed. Endovascular surgery, by avoiding the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping, and graft replacement, can reduce significant morbidity and mortality rate. Postoperative and long-term outcome of these patients treated with endovascular surgery is mainly related to pulmonary disease, not to aortic treatment.

Direct Cross-Clamping for Resection of Lung Cancer Invading the Aortic Arch or the Subclavian Artery

BACKGROUND

Resection of lung cancer infiltrating the aortic arch or the subclavian artery can be accomplished in selected patients with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Direct cross-clamping of the aortic arch and the left subclavian artery without CPB for radical resection of the tumor can be an alternative. This study presents one group's experience with this technique.

METHODS

Between October 2016 and May 2019, 9 patients (5 male, 4 female) underwent radical resection of lung cancer infiltrating the aortic arch (n = 5) or the left subclavian artery (n = 4) by direct cross-clamping technique at Sapienza University of Rome, Italy. Seven left upper lobectomies, 1 left pneumonectomy, and 1 left upper sleeve lobectomy were performed. Reconstruction of the aortic arch was performed by direct suturing or polyethylene terephthalate (Dacron) patch, whereas the subclavian artery was reconstructed with a Dacron conduit. Three patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Patients' mean age was 64.7 ± 13.3 years (range, 36 to 78 years). Aortic arch resection was partial in all cases (adventitial in 1 and full thickness in 4); left subclavian artery resection was adventitial in 2 patients and circumferential in 2. All the resections were complete. Prosthetic reconstruction was performed in 4 cases. Mean operative time was 130 ± 25.6 minutes; mean vascular clamping time was 28.2 ± 3.2 minutes. No mortality occurred. The major complication rate was 11.1 %. At a mean follow-up of 17 ± 9 months (range, 5 to 29 months), the recurrence rate was 33.3%. Median survival was 20 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct cross-clamping as an alternative to CPB for resection of lung cancer infiltrating the aortic arch or the subclavian artery is a feasible, safe, and reliable procedure in selected patients.

Penza's Surgical Maneuver: A Key to Tackle Complex Proximal Descending Thoracic Aortic Infectious or Malignant Issues

We performed off-pump ascending-to-descending aortic grafting with the debranching of left carotid and subclavian arteries and total aortic arch transection in three patients. We have called this technique “Penza's Surgical Maneuver” and propose it for a safe surgery in cases where the aortic arch, the aortic isthmus, the beginning segment of the descending aorta, the esophagus, and a lung are diseased.

Extended resections for the treatment of patients with T4 stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (T4N0-1M0) with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: a 15-year two-center experience

Background

Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous group of patients, often requiring variable and individualized approaches. The dilemma to operate or not frequently arises, since more than 75% of the cases of NSCLC are diagnosed in advanced stages (IIIA). The main objective of this study was to assess whether the benefits outweigh surgical risks for the T₄N_0-1M₀ subgroup.

Methods

Data from 857 patients with locally advanced T4 NSCLC were retrospectively collected from two different institutions, between 2002 and 2017. Clinical data that were retrieved and analyzed, included demographics, comorbidities, surgical details, neoadjuvant or/and adjuvant therapy and postoperative complications.

Results

Twelve patients were in the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) group and thirty in the non-CPB. The most common types of lung cancer were squamous cell carcinoma (50.0%) and adenocarcinoma (35.7%). The most frequent invasion of the tumor was seen in main pulmonary artery and the superior vena cava. Significantly more patients of the CPB group underwent pneumonectomy as their primary lung resection (P=0.006). In all patients R0 resection was achieved according to histological reports. The overall 5-year survival was 60%, while the median overall survival was 22.5 months. Analysis revealed that patient age (P=0.027), preoperative chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (P=0.001), tumor size (4.0 vs. 6.0 cm) (P=0.001), postoperative respiratory dysfunction (P=0.001) and postoperative atelectasis (P=0.036) are possible independent variables that are significantly correlated with patient outcome.

Conclusions

We suggest that in patients with stage IIIA/T4 NSCLC, complete resection of the T4 tumor, although challenging, can be performed in highly selected patients. Such an approach seems to result in improved long-term survival. More specific studies on this area of NSCLC probably will further enlighten this field, and may result in even better outcomes, as advanced systemic perioperative approaches such as modern chemotherapy, immunotherapy and improvements in radiation therapy have been incorporated in daily practice.

Atrial Resection without Cardiopulmonary Bypass for Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Results of resection of lung cancer invading left atrium (T4atrium) without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) remain controversial. We reviewed our experience analyzing surgical results and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent extended lung resection for T4atrium without CPB between 1998 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed using a prospective database.

RESULTS

The study included 44 patients (34 males and 10 females; median age: 63 years). Twenty-five patients underwent preoperative mediastinal staging and 27 received induction treatment (IT). Surgery included 40 (90.9%) pneumonectomies, 3 (6.8%) lobectomies, and 1 bilobectomy (2.3%). Pathological nodal status was N0 in 10 patients (22.7%), N1 in 18 (40.9%), and N2 in 16 (36.4%). Four patients receiving IT had a complete pathological response (9.1%). Eight (18.2%) patients had microscopic tumor evidence on atrial resected margins. Mortality was nil. The major complication rate was 11.4%, including one bronchopleural fistula, one cardiac herniation, and three hemothoraces, all requiring reintervention. The minor complication rate was 25.5%. After a median survival of 37 months (range: 1-144 months), 20 (45.4%) patients were alive. Five-year survival rate and disease-free interval were 39 and 45.8%, respectively. Patients with N0 and R0 disease had a best prognosis (log-rank test: p = 0.03 and p = 0.01, respectively). IT neither influenced survival nor postoperative complications. On multivariate analysis, pN0 (p = 0.04 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-9.66] and negative atrial margins (p = 0.02 [95% CI: 0.96-8.35]) were positive independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

T4atrium is technically feasible without mortality and acceptable morbidity. Patients with N2 cancers should not be operated. T4atrium should not be systematically considered as a definitive contraindication to surgery.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Invading the Descending Thoracic Aorta: Surgical Resection Without Using Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Without Cross-Clamping the Aorta: Long-Term Follow-Up of 2 Cases

Lung cancer can sometimes invade vital adjacent mediastinal structures, such as the descending thoracic aorta. We describe 2 cases where pulmonary resection was performed en bloc including a patch of the descending thoracic aorta. These procedures were easily performed using an aortic endoprosthesis in the same anesthetic procedure. We also comment some aspects about an intraoperative endoleak, postoperative evolution, and long-term follow-up.

[Cardiopulmonary bypass in thoracic surgery]

AIM

To analyze advisability of cardiopulmonary bypass in thoracic surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We estimated early and long-term results of CPB-assisted thoracic interventions in 31 patients with malignant and benign thoracic diseases and invasion into vital mediastinal structures or with concomitant cardiovascular pathology.

RESULTS

Acceptable rates of mortality and morbidity confirm safety of CPB in thoracic surgery while satisfactory long-term outcomes are arguments in favor of this direction of thoracic oncology.

Surgery for T4 lung cancer invading the thoracic aorta: Do we push the limits?

BACKGROUND

Few investigators have described en bloc resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) invading the aorta.

AIM OF STUDY

Analysis of outcome and prognostic factors for en bloc resections of NSCLC invading the aorta.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients (27 males, 8 females; mean age 63 ± 8.6 years) were operated between 1994 and 2015 in four European Centers.

HISTOLOGY

12 (34.3%) squamous cell carcinoma, and 6 (17.1%) undifferentiated/large cell carcinoma. The site of aortic infiltration was the descending thoracic aorta in 24 (68.6%) patients, the aortic arch in 9 (25.7%), and the aortic arch and supraortic trunks in 2 (5.7%).

RESULTS

Lung resection consisted of pneumonectomy in 19 (54.3%) patients and lobectomy in 16 (45.7%). Aortic resection management was undertaken by endograft positioning (37.1%), subadventitial dissection (37.1%), cardiopulmonary/aorto-aortic bypass (17.2%), and direct clamping (8.6%). A tubular graft replacement was carried out in five cases, a synthetic patch repair in 6. Mortality was 2.9%, morbidity 37.1%. Patients undergoing pneumonectomy had a significantly higher morbidity rate compared with lobectomy (52% vs 18.7%; P = 0.003), although patients managed with aortic endografting had a lower complication rate. Median overall and disease-free survival rates were 31.3 and 22.2 months, respectively. Gender and site of aortic infiltration were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of NSCLC combined with an infiltrated aorta is a challenging procedure that can be performed with reasonable morbidity and mortality in highly selected patients.

Evaluating vertebral artery dominancy before T4 lung cancer surgery requiring subclavian artery reconstruction

PURPOSES

To evaluate vertebral artery (VA) dominancy and the risk of brain infarction in T4 lung cancer patients with tumor invasion into the subclavian artery.

METHODS

We reconstructed the subclavian artery in 10 patients with T4 non-small cell lung cancer. The histological stages were IIIA in eight patients and IIIB in two patients. We evaluated the VA dominancy by performing a four-vessel study preoperatively and investigated the relationship between the methods of VA treatment and postoperative brain complications, retrospectively.

RESULTS

Seven patients had a superior sulcus tumor (SST) and three had direct invasion into the mediastinum. Based on the tumor location, a transmanublial approach was used in five patients and a posterolateral hook incision was used in the other five. All subclavian artery (SA) reconstructions were done using an artificial woven graft. Preoperative angiography of the VA revealed poor development of the contralateral side in two patients. One of these patients suffered a severe brain infarction on postoperative day 2, which proved fatal. In the other patient, the VA was connected to the left SA graft by a side-to-end anastomosis and there was no postoperative brain complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative SA and VA angiography is mandatory for identifying the need for VA reconstruction in lung cancer patients with major arterial invasion.

Surgery for malignant lesions of the chest which extensively involved the mediastinum, lung, and heart

OBJECTIVE

Radical resection for thoracic malignancies that invade the great vessels or heart structure is an uncommon, high-risk operation. To help surgeons determine therapeutic strategy, we reviewed the patient characteristics and outcomes of combined thoracic and cardiovascular surgery for thoracic malignancies.

METHODS

Surgical resections of lung cancer, mediastinal tumor and pulmonary artery sarcoma invading great vessels or heart structures were reviewed from the literature.

RESULTS

Pneumonectomy was often performed for lung cancer invading the aorta, superior vena cava, and left atrium. Complete resection (R0), no mediastinal lymph node metastasis and without using cardiopulmonary bypass led to a good prognosis. Induction therapy was often performed for complete resection. Regarding mediastinal tumors, thymic epithelial tumors or germ cell tumors occasionally invaded the great vessels or heart structures. For these malignancies, multimodality therapy was often performed, and complete resection could be one of the prognostic factors. The resection of primary pulmonary artery sarcoma (PPAS) is also a combined thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. The primary treatment for PPAS is surgical resection; specifically, pulmonary endarterectomy and pneumonectomy, because PPAS has substantial resistance to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The prognosis of PPAS is poor, but surgical resection has potential for long-term survival.

CONCLUSION

Although these surgeries are uncommon and invasive for the patients, selecting appropriate patients, aggressive multimodality therapy, and performing combined thoracic and cardiovascular surgery can contribute to a good outcome.

Extracorporeal support for pulmonary resection: current indications and results

Extracorporeal assistances are exponentially used for patients, with acute severe but reversible heart or lung failure, to provide more prolonged support to bridge patients to heart and/or lung transplantation. However, experience of use of extracorporeal assistance for pulmonary resection is limited outside lung transplantation. Airways management with standard mechanical ventilation system may be challenging particularly in case of anatomical reasons (single lung), presence of respiratory failure (ARDS), or complex tracheo-bronchial resection and reconstruction. Based on the growing experience during lung transplantation, more and more surgeons are now using such devices to achieve good oxygenation and hemodynamic support during such challenging cases. We review the different extracorporeal device and attempt to clarify the current practice and indications of extracorporeal support during pulmonary resection.

Safe resection of the aortic wall infiltrated by lung cancer after placement of an endoluminal prosthesis

BACKGROUND

Few investigators have reported the results of combined resection of lung cancer infiltrating the thoracic aorta; only anecdotal accounts of off-label use of thoracic aortic endografts to facilitate resection of such tumors have been published. In this paper, we describe our experience using this innovative approach in terms of technical details and outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data on 9 patients (6 men and 3 women, median age 61 years) with preoperatively suspected thoracic aorta neoplastic invasion, who were operated on after positioning of an endograft and underwent en bloc tumor resection including the aortic wall.

RESULTS

All but one cancer were non-small cell lung carcinomas; 4 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 7 received adjuvant therapy. Aortic endografting was performed 2 to 17 days before resection of the tumor in 7 patients and as part of a one-stage procedure in 2 patients. The proximal end of the stent graft was deployed in the aortic arch (n = 1) or the descending aorta (n = 8). Lung resections were left pneumonectomies in 4 patients and left lower lobectomies in 5. Five patients underwent additional buttressing of the aortic defect using a synthetic patch (n = 2) or the omentum (n = 3). No cardiopulmonary bypass was required. At the last follow-up, 3 patients had evidence of tumor recurrence (one local and two distant). No endograft-related complications were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic aortic endografting allowed safe en bloc resection of tumors invading the aortic wall, avoiding the need for extracorporeal circulatory support. Such an extended indication for thoracic aortic endografts seems promising and should be considered for selected oncologic cases.

Extended resections of non-small cell lung cancers invading the aorta, pulmonary artery, left atrium, or esophagus: can they be justified?

T4 tumors that invade the heart, great vessels, or esophagus comprise a heterogenous group of locally invasive lung cancers. Prognosis depends on nodal status; this relationship has been consistently demonstrated in many of the small series of extended resection. Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines do not recommend surgery for T4 extension with N2-3 disease (stage IIIB). However, biopsy-proven T4 N0-1 (stage IIIA) may be operable. Localized tumors with invasion of the aorta, pulmonary artery, left atrium, or esophagus represent a small subset of T4 disease. Acquiring sufficient randomized data to provide statistical proof of a survival advantage for patients undergoing extended resections for these neoplasms will likely never be possible.Therefore, we are left to critically analyze current documented experience to make clinical decisions on a case-by-case basis.It is clear that the operative morbidity and mortality of extended resections for locally advanced T4 tumors have significantly improved over time,yet the risks are still high. The indications for such procedures and the anticipated outcomes should be clearly weighed in terms of potential perioperative complications and expertise of the surgical team. Patients with T4 N0-1 have the best prognosis and with complete resection may have the potential for cure. The use of induction therapy and surgery for advanced T4 tumors may improve survival. Current data suggest that for tumors that invade the aorta, pulmonary artery,left atrium, or esophagus, resection should be considered in relation to multidisciplinary care.For properly selected patients receiving treatment at high volume, experienced centers, extended resections may be warranted.

Special treatment issues in non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

This guideline updates the second edition and addresses patients with particular forms of non-small cell lung cancer that require special considerations, including Pancoast tumors, T4 N0,1 M0 tumors, additional nodules in the same lobe (T3), ipsilateral different lobe (T4) or contralateral lung (M1a), synchronous and metachronous second primary lung cancers, solitary brain and adrenal metastases, and chest wall involvement.

METHODS

The nature of these special clinical cases is such that in most cases, meta-analyses or large prospective studies of patients are not available. To ensure that these guidelines were supported by the most current data available, publications appropriate to the topics covered in this article were obtained by performing a literature search of the MEDLINE computerized database. Where possible, we also reference other consensus opinion statements. Recommendations were developed by the writing committee, graded by a standardized method, and reviewed by all members of the Lung Cancer Guidelines panel prior to approval by the Thoracic Oncology NetWork, Guidelines Oversight Committee, and the Board of Regents of the American College of Chest Physicians.

RESULTS

In patients with a Pancoast tumor, a multimodality approach appears to be optimal, involving chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection, provided that appropriate staging has been carried out. Carefully selected patients with central T4 tumors that do not have mediastinal node involvement are uncommon, but surgical resection appears to be beneficial as part of their treatment rather than definitive chemoradiotherapy alone. Patients with lung cancer and an additional malignant nodule are difficult to categorize, and the current stage classification rules are ambiguous. Such patients should be evaluated by an experienced multidisciplinary team to determine whether the additional lesion represents a second primary lung cancer or an additional tumor nodule corresponding to the dominant cancer. Highly selected patients with a solitary focus of metastatic disease in the brain or adrenal gland appear to benefit from resection or stereotactic radiosurgery. This is particularly true in patients with a long disease-free interval. Finally, in patients with chest wall involvement, provided that the tumor can be completely resected and N2 nodal disease is absent, primary surgical resection should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected patients with more uncommon presentations of lung cancer may benefit from an aggressive surgical approach.

Extensive resections: pancoast tumors, chest wall resections, en bloc vascular resections

Infiltration by lung tumor of adjacent anatomic structures including major vessels, main bronchi, and chest wall not only influences the oncologic severity of the disease but also increases the technical complexity of surgery, requiring extended resections and demanding reconstructive procedures. Completeness of resection represents in every case one of the main factors influencing the long-term outcome of patients. Technical and oncologic aspects of extended operations, including resection of Pancoast tumors and chest wall, bronchovascular sleeve resections, and en bloc resections of major thoracic vessels, are reported in this article.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for resection of locally advanced thoracic tumors

BACKGROUND

The international experience with resection of advanced thoracic malignancies performed with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is limited. We examined our results to assess the risks and benefits of this approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients with thoracic malignancies who underwent tumor resection with ECMO support in our department between 2001 and 2010.

RESULTS

Nine patients (aged 21 to 71 years; mean, 54.8±7.5 years) underwent complex tracheobronchial resections (n=6) or resections of greater thoracic vessels (n=3) under venoarterial (VA) ECMO support. In 7 patients the underlying pathologic condition was non-small cell lung cancer, in 1 patient it was carcinoid tumor, and in 1 patient it was synovial sarcoma. The indication for extracorporeal support was complex tracheobronchial reconstruction (n=5), resection of the descending aorta (n=2), and resection of the inferior vena cava (n=1). ECMO cannulation was central (n=4), peripheral (n=4), or combined (n=1). Mean time on bypass was 110±19 minutes (range 40 to 135 minutes). A complete resection (R0) was achieved in 8 patients (89%). One patient died perioperatively as a result of hepatic necrosis. Eight patients were discharged from the hospital after 7 to 42 days (median, 10 days). Median time in the intensive care unit was 1 day (range, 0 to 36 days). The only complication related to the use of ECMO was a lymphatic fistula in the groin. Mean follow-up time was 38±42 months (range, 9 to 111 months). The actuarial 3-month survival was 88.9%, and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival was 76.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this experience, we consider VA ECMO support to be a safe alternative to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for advanced general thoracic operations.

[Thoracic surgery: the major surgical procedures]

The most frequent thoracic surgeries are performed for the treatment of primary lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma. For lung cancer, the standard procedures are pneumonectomy and lobectomy with associated mediastinal lymphadenectomy. In order to avoid pneumonectomy, extended lobectomy with sleeve bronchoplasty and/or angioplasty can be done. When adjacent organs are involved, extended resections are accepted (chest wall, vena cava...). For small lesions (<2 cm) without lymph nodes involvement and for patients with limited respiratory function, segmentectomy is an option (results under evaluation). For the treatment of pleural mesothelioma, the accepted oncologic resection is extra-pleural pneumonectomy extended to the diaphragm and pericardium. This surgical indication requires careful evaluation of tumour staging and patient's capacities. The morbidity and mortality of these resections require comprehensive follow-up (clinical, biological (including blood gases) and radiological).

Surgical resection and survival of patients with unsuspected single node positive lung cancer (NSCLC) invading the descending aorta

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with aortic invasion is still debated.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with locally advanced (T4) NSCLC and invasion of the descending aorta underwent pneumonectomy (n=9) or lobectomy (n=4) together with aorta en bloc resection and reconstruction (n=8) or subadventitial dissection (n=5), complete lymph node dissection, and had microscopic unsuspected node metastasis at N1 (n=5) and N2/3 (n=8) levels of whom 12 received radiation therapy. Clamp-and-sew was used to resect and reconstruct the aorta.

RESULTS

Operative mortality and morbidity rate was 0% and 23%, respectively. Four patients died of systemic tumor relapse and 2 of local recurrence. Six patients were alive after a median follow-up of 40 months (range 15-125 months). Overall 5-year survival rate was 45%. Median survival time and 5-year survival rate of patients after aortic resection was 35 months and 67%, respectively, and was 17 months and 0%, respectively, after aortic subadventi-tial dissection (p=0.001). N1 and N2 nodal status adversely affected survival, but survival difference was not significant (N1 versus N2/3; 52% versus 39% at 5 years; p=0.998).

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic resection with single station node positive T4 lung cancer can achieve long-term survival. The data indicate that aortic resection-reconstruction is associated with better outcome than subadventitial dissection.

Cryopreserved arterial allograft reconstruction after excision of thoracic malignancies

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and immunologic outcome of cryopreserved arterial allograft (CAA) revascularization of intrathoracic vessels invaded by malignancies.

METHODS

Since January 2002, consecutive patients whose intrathoracic vessels were invaded by malignancies were operated on and revascularizion made using human lymphocyte antigen (HLA)- and ABO-mismatched CAAs. Immunologic studies were performed preoperatively, and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Postoperative oral anticoagulation therapy was not given.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients aged 53.1 +/- 15 years with a nonsmall-cell lung cancer (n = 10), invasive mediastinal tumors (n = 7), pulmonary artery sarcoma (n = 3), laryngeal (n = 2), or other rare lung neoplasms (n = 4) underwent operation. Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in 10 cases (38%), and all resections were pathologically complete. Revascularization was either for venous (n = 12) or arterial (n = 14) vessels, and a total of 30 allografts revascularized the superior vena cava (n = 6), pulmonary artery (n = 7), innominate vein (n = 3) or artery (n = 2), ascendent (n = 4) or descending (n = 1) aorta, and subclavian vein (n = 3) or artery (n = 4). Hospital morbidity and mortality were 50% (n = 13) and 3.8% (n = 1), respectively, all CAA unrelated. With a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 3 to 60+), 5-year survival and allograft patency were 84% and 95%, respectively. Preoperative anti-HLA antibodies were detected in 2 patients (7.7%) and a postoperative anti-HLA antibody response, clinically irrelevant, in 1 of 24 patients (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Revascularization of intrathoracic venous and arterial vessels in patients with malignancies using HLA- and ABO-mismatched CAA is technically feasible and clinically attractive because of no infection risk and postoperative anticoagulation, and excellent long-term survival, patency, and nonimmunogeneicity.

Surgical management of lung cancer invading the aorta or the superior vena cava

OBJECTIVE

Invasion of mediastinal structures (T4) is considered as an absolute contraindication to surgical management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The authors studied the role of surgical treatment in case of direct aortic and superior venous caval involvement.

PATIENTS

From 1995 to 2000, 13 patients with left lung NSCLC invading descending aorta and 9 patients with right upper lobe NSCLC and superior vena cava (SVC) invasion were subjected to thoracotomy for lung resection. Surgery was indicated in case of absence of intraluminal extension. All patients were cN2 negative. The pathology results and 5-year survival were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

In three cases (23%) the tumor was adhered to the parietal pleura overlying descending aorta, which was resected en block with tumor-associated lung parenchyma. Aortic adventitia invasion by tumor led to local resection of adventitia (<1cm(2)) in nine patients (69%). Invasion deeper than adventitia was encountered in one case (8%), which was managed with aortic partial occlusion, resection of aortic wall and repair of the defect with Gore graft patch. In three patients (33%) the SVC wall was involved by the tumor 1-3cm in length and 2-4mm of the circumference. The defect was repaired with direct suturing. In five patients (56%) the area of SVC wall that was invaded was 3cmx2cm. The defect was repaired with Dacron patch. In 1 patient (11%) an arterial 14 graft was end-to-end interposed. All resections were radical (R0). Neither associated postoperative complications nor operative mortality was recorded. Five-year survival was 30.7% for the cases with aortic invasion and 11% for the ones with SVC involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical surgical resection of lung tumors with localized aortic invasion can be considered after exclusion of N2 involvement.

Resection of Locally Advanced (T4) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

BACKGROUND

Resection of T4 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has rarely been reported in the literature. Hence, we have reviewed our experience in the role of CPB for the surgical treatment of locally advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

All patients undergoing lung resection for bronchogenic carcinoma on CPB in our institution between January 1998 and June 2004 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seven patients underwent lung resections on CPB for bronchogenic carcinoma during the study period. Cardiopulmonary bypass was performed for tumors invading the subclavian artery down to the aortic arch (n = 2), the descending aorta (n = 1), or the origin of the left pulmonary artery with the left atrium (n = 2). All patients were discharged home after 9 to 21 days (median, 15 days). In the long term, 2 patients are alive without recurrence 17 and 25 months after their operations, and 3 are alive with recurrence 8, 13, and 54 months postoperatively. Two additional patients required CPB while undergoing carinal resection for difficulty ventilating the left lung. Both patients had a difficult postoperative course, but were eventually discharged from hospital. One patient died without recurrence 6 months later, and the other is alive without recurrence after 72 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the safety of CPB for NSCLC invading the great vessels and/or the left atrium in well-selected patients, and its utility when pulmonary edema develops during carinal resection. Further studies, however, are required to confirm long-term survival.

Surgical resection for lung cancer with infiltration of the thoracic aorta

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of a combined resection of the thoracic aorta and primary lung cancer.

METHODS

Sixteen patients underwent thoracic aorta resection along with a left pneumonectomy (n = 6), left upper lobectomy (n = 9), or partial lung resection (n = 1), of whom 10 also received preoperative induction therapy. Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in 10 patients, and a passive shunt between the ascending aorta and the descending aorta was used in 4 patients.

RESULTS

Six postoperative major complications occurred in 5 patients, including postoperative bleeding (n = 3), intraoperative bleeding (n = 1), chylothorax (n = 1), and respiratory failure (n = 1). The postoperative morbidity rate was 31%, and the mortality rate was 12.5% (2/16). Furthermore, 4 patients died of systemic tumor relapse, and 1 patient died of intrapleural recurrence. Nine patients were alive after a median follow-up of 54 months (range, 12-199 months). The median survival time of patients with postoperative pathologic N0 disease was 31 months, whereas it was 10 months for those with pathologic N2 or N3 disease. Five-year survivals were 70% for patients with N0 disease and 16.7% for patients with N2 or N3 disease ( P = .0070).

CONCLUSIONS

Although pulmonary resection with the involved aorta might cause high surgical morbidity and mortality rates, encouraging long-term survivals were obtained in patients without mediastinal nodal involvement.

Bronchial Stump Coverage With a Pedicled Pericardial Flap: An Effective Method for Prevention of Postpneumonectomy Bronchopleural Fistula

BACKGROUND

Bronchopleural fistula is a serious complication after pneumonectomy. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the efficacy of bronchial stump reinforcement with a pedicled flap of whole pericardium.

METHODS

The bronchial stump of 93 consecutive patients who underwent pneumonectomy between July 1988 and March 2003 was covered with a pedicled pericardial flap. Pneumonectomy was performed for primary lung cancer in 89.2% of patients. The study patients received concomitant extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy, resection of adjacent structures (aorta, vena cava, thoracic wall), and neoadjuvant or planned adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both. Operative and perioperative complications were recorded, and patients were followed up for a mean of 15 +/- 21.2 months (range, 9 to 126).

RESULTS

Perioperative mortality was 4.3% (n = 4; pulmonary embolism, sepsis, cardiac arrest, and sudden death in 1 patient each). Perioperative complications occurred in 2 patients: renal failure and hemiplegia in 1 patient and cardiac tamponade in 1 patient. The latter complication, caused by tight reconstruction of the pericardium, was directly related to the applied method and required reoperation. No evidence of postpneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula was observed perioperatively and during the whole follow-up. One-year and 2-year survival was 65.7% and 44.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Bronchial stump reinforcement with a pericardial flap is a highly effective method for preventing postpneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula in selected patients.

High Relapse-Free Survival After Preoperative and Intraoperative Radiotherapy and Resection for Sulcus Superior Tumors *

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Relapse-free survival in patients with sulcus superior tumors.

DESIGN

Prospective registration study.

SETTING

Department of surgical oncology of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty-one patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy (46 Gy), lobectomy and chest-wall resection, and intraoperative radiotherapy (10 Gy).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 18 months, 18 patients (85%) were free from locoregional relapse, while 8 patients were still alive.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that this protocol can achieve excellent local tumor control and can even be used for palliative treatment.

Surgery for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Advanced stage non-small lung cancers are currently considered unresectable. However numerous series on patients with locally advanced disease treated by surgery have been published. Surgery alone or induction treatments followed by surgery achieve long-term outcomes in an encouraging proportion of selected patients with T4 disease, despite the high rate of morbidity associated with technically demanding procedures.

Radical resections for T4 lung cancer

T4 lung cancers are a heterogeneous group of locally advanced lung cancers. Treatment is palliative for the majority of patients, ranging from supportive care to chemoradiotherapy. In certain patients, however, surgery is beneficial and may be curative. Patients with T4N0M0 cancers invading the distal trachea, carina, left atrium, aorta, superior vena cava, or vertebral bodies may be surgical candidates. Radical resections of these T4 lung cancers have potential for cure if no mediastinal lymph node metastases (N2 or N3) occur and if resection is complete. Increased postoperative mortality exists and extends beyond 30 days, as evidenced by a 30-day mortality of 8% and a 90-day mortality of 18%. Improved palliation (median survival of 19 months) and cure (31% five-year survival) are possible in patients who meet the criteria, who undergo radical resection, and who are followed by physicians in facilities with special interests in extended resections. The use of induction therapy and surgery in T4 patients may further increase survival and the number of T4 patients in whom radical resection is possible. Radical resections are contraindicated in patients with T4 lung cancers associated with malignant pleural effusions. Unfortunately, these patients have the worst prognosis. If surgical palliation is an option, only pulmonary resection with pleurectomy and not pleuropneumonectomy should be considered. In contrast, lung cancers with the best prognosis are those T4 tumors diagnosed because of a satellite tumor nodule within the same lobe. Because radical resections are usually not required, operative mortality is not increased. Five-year survival in patients with satellite intralobar tumor nodules without mediastinal nodal metastases is comparable to survival of highly selected T4N0M0 patients who undergo radical resection. These two extremes of T4 lung cancers, malignant pleural effusion and satellite intralobar tumor nodules, generally are not considered for or do not require radical resections. It is debatable that the definition of T4 should include these entities.

Is lung cancer surgery justified in patients with direct mediastinal invasion?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the results of the surgical treatment of patients with stage IIIB non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) invading the mediastinum (T4).

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients were operated on from 1986 to 1999. Histology was squamous cell carcinoma in 17 patients, adenocarcinoma in eight, large cell carcinoma in two and neuroendocrinal carcinoma in two. Three patients received a preoperative chemotherapy (n = 2) or radiochemotherapy (n = 1). The lung resection consisted of a pneumonectomy in 25 patients and a lobectomy in four. The procedure was extended to one of the following structures: superior vena cava (SVC) (n = 17), aorta (n = 1), left atrium (n = 5) and carina (n = 6). Seventeen patients had a postoperative regimen including radiochemotherapy (n = 12), radiotherapy (n = 4), or chemotherapy (n = 1).

RESULTS

Complete R0 resection was achieved in 25 patients, whereas four patients had a microscopically (n = 1) or macroscopically (n = 3) residual disease. The operative mortality rate was 7% (n = 2). Non-fatal major complications occurred in eight patients (28%). Overall 5-year survival rate was 28% (median 11 months), including the operative mortality. The median survival of the 18 patients with an N0 or N1 disease was 16 months whereas the median survival of the 11 patients with an N2 disease was 9 months. At completion of the study, 22 patients have died, two postoperatively and 10 from pulmonary causes without evidence of cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical management of T4 NSC lung cancer invading the mediastinum should be considered, in the absence of N2 disease, when a complete resection is achievable.

Risk analysis and long-term survival in patients undergoing resection of T4 lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to identify the risk group of patients with T4 lung cancer who could more likely benefit from surgical resection.

METHODS

Between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 1998, 77 patients underwent pulmonary resection for T4 lung cancer: lobectomy (n = 20), bilobectomy (n = 4) and pneumonectomy (n = 53). The T4 sites of mediastinal involvement were: Intrapericardiac portions of the pulmonary artery (n = 30), left atrium (n = 19), aorta (n = 8), superior vena cava (n = 8), carina (n = 7), the esophagus (n = 8) and the vertebral body (n = 6). Ten patients had multiple neoplastic nodules in the same lobe of the lung.

RESULTS

Overall survival rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 46, 31 and 21%, respectively. Factors adversely affecting survival with univariate analysis included the localization of tumours in the lower lobe (P = 0.04) and both the involvement of superior and inferior mediastinal lymph nodes (P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis included two factors adversely affecting survival: the location of the primary tumour and the nodal stations involved. Regression tree analysis classified the patients into low-risk group (primary tumour in upper lobe or in main stem bronchus and pN0 or pN1 or superior or inferior mediastinal nodes involved), intermediate-risk group (primary tumour in upper lobe or in main stem bronchus and both superior and inferior mediastinal nodes involved, primary tumour in inferior lobe and pN0 or pN1 or inferior mediastinal nodes involved) and high-risk group (primary tumour in inferior lobe and both superior and inferior nodes involved). The 3-year survival rates were 36% for the low-risk group, 4% for the intermediate-risk group and 0% for the high-risk group (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with T4 lung cancer, the surgery can justify itself for tumours in the upper lobe or in the main stem bronchus and with pN0 or pN1.

Impact of different coverage techniques on incidence of postpneumonectomy stump fistula

OBJECTIVE

Postpneumonectomy bronchial stump fistula (PBSF) is a serious complication with a reported incidence between 0 and 12%. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the effectiveness of different coverage techniques of the bronchial stump applied in a consecutive series of pneumonectomies in avoiding this particular problem.

METHODS

Between 1/87 and 10/97, 129 patients (90 male, 39 female, mean age 57.8 years, range: 15-78 years) underwent pneumonectomy by one surgeon (W.K.). In 14 patients, additional resection procedures were performed (aorta n = 6, vena cava n = 5, thoracic wall n = 3). In all patients with malignancies (n = 123), mediastinal lymphadenectomy was routinely added to the procedure. Bronchial stump closure was performed by means of stapling devices in all patients. Coverage of the bronchial stump was performed with a generous pedicled pericardial flap and concomitant reconstruction of the pericardium with Vicryl mesh (n = 50), with a portion of the posterior pericardium (n = 16), with the azygos vein (n = 12), with surrounding mediastinal tissue (n = 25), with pleura (n = 16), or with intercostal muscle flap (n = 3); no coverage at all was performed in seven patients. In all patients with high risk for development of PBSF, i.e. patients who received any form of neoadjuvant therapy or had extended resections, the pericardial flap technique was used.

RESULTS

Perioperative mortality was 5.4% (n = 7) and five patients (3.9%) experienced significant perioperative complications, with one of them directly related to the method of bronchial stump coverage (cardiac tamponade due to the use of a too small Vicryl mesh for reconstruction of the pericardium). Follow-up was 96.1% complete (five patients were lost to follow-up). Fourty-seven patients (36.4%) died late after operation (mean 19+/-13 months, median 17 months), mainly due to recurrence of their underlying malignant disease. PBSF occurred in one patient only (0.8%), 2 weeks after operation (coverage with pleura). No PBSF was seen in the long term follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Coverage of the bronchial stump contributes to a low incidence of PBSF. In view of the fact, that this serious complication was completely avoided in the pericardial flap group (used in patients with expected higher risk for PBSF), this particular technique seems to offer the best results.