Co-expression of the beta2-adrenoceptor and dopamine D1-receptor with Gsalpha proteins in Sf9 insect cells: limitations in comparison with fusion proteins

Pharmacological Characterization of Human Histamine Receptors and Histamine Receptor Mutants in the Sf9 Cell Expression System

A large problem of histamine receptor research is data heterogeneity. Various experimental approaches, the complex signaling pathways of mammalian cells, and the use of different species orthologues render it difficult to compare and interpret the published results. Thus, the four human histamine receptor subtypes were analyzed side-by-side in the Sf9 insect cell expression system, using radioligand binding assays as well as functional readouts proximal to the receptor activation event (steady-state GTPase assays and [35S]GTPγS assays). The human H1R was co-expressed with the regulators of G protein signaling RGS4 or GAIP, which unmasked a productive interaction between hH1R and insect cell Gαq. By contrast, functional expression of the hH2R required the generation of an hH2R-Gsα fusion protein to ensure close proximity of G protein and receptor. Fusion of hH2R to the long (GsαL) or short (GsαS) splice variant of Gαs resulted in comparable constitutive hH2R activity, although both G protein variants show different GDP affinities. Medicinal chemistry studies revealed profound species differences between hH1R/hH2R and their guinea pig orthologues gpH1R/gpH2R. The causes for these differences were analyzed by molecular modeling in combination with mutational studies. Co-expression of the hH3R with Gαi1, Gαi2, Gαi3, and Gαi/o in Sf9 cells revealed high constitutive activity and comparable interaction efficiency with all G protein isoforms. A comparison of various cations (Li+, Na+, K+) and anions (Cl-, Br-, I-) revealed that anions with large radii most efficiently stabilize the inactive hH3R state. Potential sodium binding sites in the hH3R protein were analyzed by expressing specific hH3R mutants in Sf9 cells. In contrast to the hH3R, the hH4R preferentially couples to co-expressed Gαi2 in Sf9 cells. Its high constitutive activity is resistant to NaCl or GTPγS. The hH4R shows structural instability and adopts a G protein-independent high-affinity state. A detailed characterization of affinity and activity of a series of hH4R antagonists/inverse agonists allowed first conclusions about structure/activity relationships for inverse agonists at hH4R. In summary, the Sf9 cell system permitted a successful side-by-side comparison of all four human histamine receptor subtypes. This chapter summarizes the results of pharmacological as well as medicinal chemistry/molecular modeling approaches and demonstrates that these data are not only important for a deeper understanding of HxR pharmacology, but also have significant implications for the molecular pharmacology of GPCRs in general.

Interaction of fenoterol stereoisomers with β2-adrenoceptor-G sα fusion proteins: antagonist and agonist competition binding

The specific interaction between G-protein-coupled receptors and ligand is the starting point for downstream signaling. Fenoterol stereoisomers were successfully used to probe ligand-specific activation (functional selectivity) of the β2-adrenoceptor (β2AR) (Reinartz et al. 2015). In the present study, we extended the pharmacological profile of fenoterol stereoisomers using β2AR-Gsα fusion proteins in agonist and antagonist competition binding assays. Dissociations between binding affinities and effector potencies were found for (R,S')- and (S,S')-isomers of 4'-methoxy-1-naphthyl-fenoterol. Our data corroborate former studies on the importance of the aminoalkyl moiety of fenoterol derivatives for functional selectivity.

Impact of fusion to Gα(i2) and co-expression with RGS proteins on pharmacological properties of human cannabinoid receptors CB₁R and CB₂R

OBJECTIVES

G protein coupled receptor (GPCR)-Gα fusion proteins are often employed to investigate receptor/G protein interaction. In this study, the impact of Gα fusion proteins on pharmacology of CBRs, both mediating signals through Gα(i) proteins, were investigated. Gα(i2) was fused to the C-terminus of the CBRs or co-expressed with non-fused Gα(i2) in Sf9 cells, always together with Gβ₁γ₂. Furthermore, the impact of RGS proteins on CBR signaling in combination with the CBR fusion approach was examined, using RGS4 and RGS19 as paradigms.

METHODS

CBR ligands were characterized in the steady-state GTPase assay and pharmacological properties of ligands in the different test systems were correlated.

KEY FINDINGS

Fusion of CBRs to Gα(i2) enhanced the maximal stimulatory effects of ligands compared to the co-expression system, especially for CB₂R. RGS4, but not RGS19, behaved as a GTPase-activating protein at CBRs in the Gα(i2) co-expression and fusion system. Fusion of GPCR, most prominently CB₂R, to Gα(i2) , and co-expression with RGS4 altered the pharmacological properties of ligands.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that fusion of CB₂R to Gα(i2) and co-expression with RGS4 impedes with conformational changes. Moreover, our results support the concept of ligand-specific receptor conformations. Finally, this paper describes the most sensitive CBR test system currently available.

Fusion proteins as model systems for the analysis of constitutive GPCR activity

In many cases, the coexpression of GPCRs with G-proteins and/or regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS-proteins) allows a successful reconstitution of high-affinity agonist binding and functional responses. However, in some cases, coexpressed GPCRs and G-proteins interact inefficiently, resulting in weak [³⁵S]GTPγS- and steady-state GTPase assay signals. This may be, for example, caused by a rapid dissociation of the G-protein from the plasma membrane, as has been reported for Gα(s). Moreover, for a detailed characterization of GPCR/G-protein interactions, it may be required to work with a defined GPCR/G-protein stoichiometry and to avoid cross-interaction with endogenous G-proteins. Cross-talk to endogenous G-proteins has been shown to play a role in some mammalian expression systems. These problems can be addressed by the generation of GPCR-Gα fusion proteins and their expression in Sf9 insect cells. When the C-terminus of the receptor is fused to the N-terminus of the G-protein, a 1:1 stoichiometry of both proteins is achieved. In addition, the close proximity of GPCR and G-protein in fusion proteins leads to enhanced interaction efficiency, resulting in increased functional signals. This approach can also be extended to fusion proteins of GPCRs with RGS-proteins, specifically when steady-state GTP hydrolysis is used as read-out. GPCR-RGS fusion proteins optimize the interaction of RGS-proteins with coexpressed Gα subunits, since the location of the RGS-protein is close to the site of receptor-mediated G-protein activation. Moreover, in contrast to coexpression systems, GPCR-Gα and GPCR-RGS fusion proteins provide a possibility to imitate physiologically occurring interactions, for example, the precoupling of receptors and G-proteins or the formation of complexes between GPCRs, G-proteins and RGS-proteins (transducisomes). In this chapter, we describe the technique for the generation of fusion proteins and show the application of this approach for the characterization of constitutively active receptors.

Levels of Gsα(short and long), Gα(olf) and Gβ(common) subunits, and calcium-sensitive adenylyl cyclase isoforms (1, 5/6, 8) in post-mortem human brain caudate and cortical membranes: comparison with rat brain membranes and potential stoichiometric relationships

The levels of expression of Gsα(short and long), Gα(olf) and Gβ(common) subunits, and calcium-sensitive adenylyl cyclases isoforms (AC1, 5/6, and 8) in human brain cortical and caudate membranes were quantified by western blot analysis in order to establish their contribution to the patterns of AC functioning. Both areas expressed Gsα(long) (52 kDa) with values ranging from about 1400 ng/mg of membrane protein in cerebral cortex to close to 600 ng/mg of membrane protein in caudate nucleus. In contrast, Gsα(short) and Gsα(olf) were expressed separately, Gsα(short) in cortical membranes with values around 500 ng/mg of membrane protein and Gα(olf) in caudate membranes with values around 1300 ng/mg of membrane protein. Quantitative measurements of Gβ, revealed a similar expression level in cortical and caudate membranes (5444±732 versus 5511±394 ng/mg protein; p=0.966). The B(max) values of GTPγS-dependent [(3)H]-forskolin binding show the following descending order: rat striatal membranes>rat cortical membranes=human caudate membranes>human cortical membranes. Therefore, as measured immunochemically and by [(3)H]-forskolin binding, there seems to be a vast excess of Gsα subunits over catalytic units of AC. The highest levels of AC5/6 expression were detected in caudate membranes. AC8 was little expressed, and there were no significant differences in the relative values between both human brain regions. Finally, the levels of the AC1 isoform were significantly lower in caudate than in cortical membranes. It is concluded that these stoichiometric data contribute nonetheless to explain the significant differences observed in signalling capacities through the AC system in both human brain regions.

Sf9 cells: a versatile model system to investigate the pharmacological properties of G protein-coupled receptors

The Sf9 cell/baculovirus expression system is widely used for high-level protein expression, often with the purpose of purification. However, proteins may also be functionally expressed in the defined Sf9 cell environment. According to the literature, the pharmacology of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) functionally reconstituted in Sf9 cells is similar to the receptor properties in mammalian cells. Sf9 cells express both recombinant GPCRs and G-proteins at much higher levels than mammalian cells. Sf9 cells can be grown in suspension culture, providing an inexpensive way of obtaining large protein amounts. Co-infection with various baculoviruses allows free combination of GPCRs with different G-proteins. The absence of constitutively active receptors in Sf9 cells provides an excellent signal-to background ratio in functional assays, allowing the detection of agonist-independent receptor activity and of small ligand-induced signals including partial agonistic and inverse agonistic effects. Insect cell Gα(i)-like proteins mostly do not couple productively to mammalian GPCRs. Thus, unlike in mammalian cells, Sf9 cells do not require pertussis toxin treatment to obtain a Gα(i)-free environment. Co-expression of GPCRs with Gα(i1), Gα(i2), Gα(i3) or Gα(o) in Sf9 cells allows the generation of a selectivity profile for these Gα(i/o)-isoforms. Additionally, GPCR-G-protein combinations can be compared with defined 1:1 stoichiometry by expressing GPCR-Gα fusion proteins. Sf9 cells can also be employed for ligand screening in medicinal chemistry programs, using radioligand binding assays or functional assays, like the steady-state GTPase- or [(35)S]GTPγS binding assay. This review shows that Sf9 cells are a versatile model system to investigate the pharmacological properties of GPCRs.

Activation and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase isoforms by forskolin analogs

Adenylyl cyclase (AC) isoforms 1 to 9 are differentially expressed in tissues and constitute an interesting drug target. ACs 1 to 8 are activated by the diterpene, forskolin (FS). It is unfortunate that there is a paucity of AC isoform-selective activators. To develop such compounds, an understanding of the structure/activity relationships of diterpenes is necessary. Therefore, we examined the effects of FS and nine FS analogs on ACs 1, 2, and 5 expressed in Spodoptera frugiperda insect cells. Diterpenes showed the highest potencies at AC1 and the lowest potencies at AC2. We identified full agonists, partial agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists, i.e., diterpenes that reduced basal AC activity. Each AC isoform exhibited a distinct pharmacological profile. AC2 showed the highest basal activity of all AC isoforms and highest sensitivity to inverse agonistic effects of 1-deoxy-forskolin, 7-deacetyl-1,9-dideoxy-forskolin, and, particularly, BODIPY-forskolin. In contrast, BODIPY-forskolin acted as partial agonist at the other ACs. 1-Deoxy-forskolin analogs were devoid of agonistic activity at ACs but antagonized the effects of FS in a mixed competitive/noncompetitive manner. At purified catalytic AC subunits, BODIPY-forskolin acted as weak partial agonist/strong partial antagonist. Molecular modeling revealed that the BODIPY group rotates promiscuously outside of the FS-binding site. Collectively, ACs are not uniformly activated and inhibited by FS and FS analogs, demonstrating the feasibility to design isoform-selective FS analogs. The two- and multiple-state models, originally developed to conceptualize ligand effects at G-protein-coupled receptors, can be applied to ACs to explain certain experimental data.

Mutations of Cys-17 and Ala-271 in the human histamine H2 receptor determine the species selectivity of guanidine-type agonists and increase constitutive activity

In a steady-state GTPase activity assay, N-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl)]guanidines and N(G)-acylated derivatives are more potent and efficacious at fusion proteins of guinea pig (gpH(2)R-G(salphaS)) than human (hH(2)R-G(salphaS)) histamine H(2) receptor, coupled to the short splice variant of G(salpha), G(salphaS). Whereas Ala-271 (hH(2)R) and Asp-271 (gpH(2)R) in transmembrane domain 7 were identified to determine the potency differences of guanidine-type agonists, the molecular basis for the efficacy differences remains to be elucidated. A homology model of the gpH(2)R suggested that an H-bond between Tyr-17 and Asp-271 stabilizes an active receptor conformation of the gpH(2)R. In the present study, we generated a mutant hH(2)R-G(salphaS) with Cys-17--> Tyr-17/Ala-271--> Asp-271 exchanges (hH(2)R-->gpH(2)R) that exhibited an enhanced level of constitutive GTPase activity and adenylyl cyclase activity compared with wild-type hH(2)R-G(salphaS) and gpH(2)R-G(salphaS). Potencies and efficacies of guanidines and N(G)-acylguanidines were increased at this mutant receptor compared with hH(2)R-G(salphaS), but they were still lower than at gpH(2)R-G(salphaS), suggesting that aside from Tyr-17 and Asp-271 additional amino acids contribute to the distinct pharmacological profiles of both species isoforms. Another hH(2)R-G(salphaS) mutant with a Cys-17--> Tyr-17 exchange showed inefficient coupling to G(salphaS) as revealed by reduced agonist-stimulated GTPase and basal adenylyl cyclase activities. Collectively, our present pharmacological study confirms the existence of an H-bond between Tyr-17 and Asp-271 favoring the stabilization of an active receptor conformation. Distinct potencies and efficacies of agonists and inverse agonists further support the concept of ligand-specific conformations in wild-type and mutant H(2)R-G(salphaS) fusion proteins.

Constitutive activity and ligand selectivity of human, guinea pig, rat, and canine histamine H2 receptors

Previous studies revealed pharmacological differences between human and guinea pig histamine H(2) receptors (H(2)Rs) with respect to the interaction with guanidine-type agonists. Because H(2)R species variants are structurally very similar, comparative studies are suited to relate different properties of H(2)R species isoforms to few molecular determinants. Therefore, we systematically compared H(2)Rs of human (h), guinea pig (gp), rat (r), and canine (c). Fusion proteins of hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, rH(2)R, and cH(2)R, respectively, and the short splice variant of G(salpha), G(salphaS), were expressed in Sf9 insect cells. In the membrane steady-state GTPase activity assay, cH(2)R-G(salphaS) but neither gpH(2)R-G(salphaS) nor rH(2)R-G(salphaS) showed the hallmarks of increased constitutive activity compared with hH(2)R-G(salphaS), i.e., increased efficacies of partial agonists, increased potencies of agonists with the extent of potency increase being correlated with the corresponding efficacies at hH(2)R-G(salphaS), increased inverse agonist efficacies, and decreased potencies of antagonists. Furthermore, in membranes expressing nonfused H(2)Rs without or together with mammalian G(salphaS) or H(2)R-G(salpha) fusion proteins, the highest basal and GTP-dependent increases in adenylyl cyclase activity were observed for cH(2)R. An example of ligand selectivity is given by metiamide, acting as an inverse agonist at hH(2)R-G(salphaS), gpH(2)R-G(salphaS), and rH(2)R-G(salphaS) in the GTPase assay in contrast to being a weak partial agonist with decreased potency at cH(2)R-G(salphaS). In conclusion, the cH(2)R exhibits increased constitutive activity compared with hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, and rH(2)R, and there is evidence for ligand-specific conformations in H(2)R species isoforms.

Modulation of dopamine D1 receptor signaling by adenosine A1 receptors in Sf9 cells requires expression of Gi proteins

There are several evidences that some functions of D1 dopamine receptors can be modulated by colocalized adenosine A1 receptors. To elucidate the role of particular components of the receptor complex in the ligand binding and second messenger activation level we have used Sf9 cell expression system. The expression of D1 and A1 receptors was confirmed by proper binding of specific radioligands [3H]SCH23390 (Kd=1.1+/-0.1 nM, Bmax=2.2+/-0.1 pmol/mg protein) and [3H]DPCPX (Kd=2.1+/-0.8nM, Bmax=2.9+/-0.4 pmol/mg protein), respectively. The kinetics of [3H]SCH23390 binding corresponded to the simplest reversible bimolecular binding reaction of complex formation, with k(on)=0.20+/-0.02 min(-1)nM(-1) and k(off)=0.13+/-0.01 min(-1). Dopaminergic agonists increased the accumulation of cAMP in the transfected cells in concentration-dependent manner, indicating a correct coupling of receptor to second messenger system. The coupling of the A1 receptor to Gi proteins was confirmed by both GTPgammaS dependent agonist binding and inhibition of cAMP accumulation by N-cyclopentyladenosine (NCPA). Activation of the A1 receptor by NCPA had no significant influence on neither affinities of dopaminergic ligands nor the radioligand binding kinetics to the co-exprssed D1 receptors in Sf9 cell membranes. On the other hand, the activation of the A1 receptors inhibited the D1 receptor-specific accumulation of cAMP, but only in cells where Gi proteins were expressed with the receptors.

Decreased GTP-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity in HPRT-deficient human and mouse fibroblast and rat B103 neuroblastoma cell membranes

Defect of the purine salvage enzyme, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT), results in Lesch-Nyhan disease (LND). It is unknown how the metabolic defect translates into the severe neuropsychiatric phenotype characterized by self-injurious behavior, dystonia and mental retardation. There are abnormalities in GTP, UTP and CTP concentrations in HPRT-deficient cells. Moreover, GTP, ITP, XTP, UTP and CTP differentially support Gs-protein-mediated adenylyl cyclase (AC) activation. Based on these findings we hypothesized that abnormal AC regulation may constitute the missing link between HPRT deficiency and the neuropsychiatric symptoms in LND. To test this hypothesis, we studied AC activity in membranes from primary human skin and immortalized mouse skin fibroblasts, mouse Neuro-2a neuroblastoma cells and rat B103 neuroblastoma cells. In B103 control membranes, GTP, ITP, XTP and UTP exhibited profound stimulatory effects on basal AC activity that approached the effects of hydrolysis-resistant nucleotide analogs. In HPRT- membranes, the stimulatory effects of GTP, ITP, XTP and UTP were strongly reduced. Similarly, in human and mouse skin fibroblast membranes we also observed a decrease in GTP-stimulated AC activity in HPRT-deficient cells compared with the respective controls. In mouse Neuro-2a neuroblastoma membranes, AC activity in the presence of GTP was below the detection limit of the assay. We discuss several possibilities to explain the abnormalities in AC regulation in HPRT deficiency that encompass various species and cell types.

Differential interactions of G-proteins and adenylyl cyclase with nucleoside 5'-triphosphates, nucleoside 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphates and nucleoside 5'-[beta,gamma-imido]triphosphates

The regulatory G-proteins of adenylyl cyclase (AC), G(i) and G(s), are not only activated by GTP and the stable GTP analogs, guanosine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate (GTPgammaS) and guanosine 5'-[beta,gamma-imido]triphosphate (GppNHp), but also by hypoxanthine, xanthine, uracil and cytidine nucleotides. The latter nucleotides were previously used to analyze distinct active G-protein states. Surprisingly, recent studies have shown that inosine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate and uridine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate can also inhibit AC directly. Therefore, we systematically compared the interactions of nucleoside 5'-triphosphates (NTPs), nucleoside 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphates (NTPgammaSs) and nucleoside 5'-[beta,gamma-imido]triphosphates (NppNHps) with G(i), G(s) and AC. NTPgammaSs exhibited up to 26,000-fold higher affinity for G-proteins than NTPs and NppNHps. NTPgammaSs were up to 150-fold more potent direct AC inhibitors than NTPs and NppNHps. G-proteins exhibited striking preference for guanine nucleotides compared to other purine and pyrimidine nucleotides, whereas base-selectivity of various ACs, particularly the purified catalytic subunits C1.C2, was rather poor. GTP, GTPgammaS and GppNHp exhibited much higher selectivity for G-proteins relative to AC than all other purine and pyrimidine nucleotides. We have energetically characterized the interactions of purine and pyrimidine nucleotides with AC in silico, constructing pharmacophore models that correlate well with experimental affinities and have elucidated specific amino acid residues with greatest influence on nucleotide binding. Collectively, both G-proteins and ACs bind purine and pyrimidine nucleotides, with G-proteins showing much higher base-selectivity than AC. Thus, direct inhibitory effects of nucleotides on AC should be understood and considered when probing distinct active G-protein states with non-guanine nucleotides.

Alternative transcripts and evidence of imprinting of GNAL on 18p11.2

Genetic studies implicating the region of human chromosome 18p11.2 in susceptibility to bipolar disorder and schizophrenia have observed parent-of-origin effects that may be explained by genomic imprinting. We have identified a transcriptional variant of the GNAL gene in this region, employing an alternative first exon that is 5' to the originally identified start site. This alternative GNAL transcript encodes a longer functional variant of the stimulatory G-protein alpha subunit, Golf. The isoforms of Golf display different expression patterns in the CNS and functionally couple to the dopamine D1 receptor when heterologously expressed in Sf9 cells. In addition, there are CpG islands in the vicinity of both first exons that are differentially methylated, a hallmark of genomic imprinting. These results suggest that GNAL, and possibly other genes in the region, is subject to epigenetic regulation and strengthen the case for a susceptibility gene in this region.

Xanthine nucleotide-specific G-protein alpha-subunits: a novel approach for the analysis of G-protein-mediated signal transduction

Pro- and eukaryotic cells express multiple GTP-binding proteins that play crucial roles in signal transduction. GTP-binding proteins possess a highly conserved NKX D motif critically involved in guanine binding. In order to selectively activate a defined GTP-binding protein, base-specificity can be switched from guanine to xanthine by mutating the conserved aspartate into asparagine (D/N-mutation). This approach was very successful at elucidating the function of structurally diverse GTP-binding proteins in complex systems. However, attempts to generate functional xanthine nucleotide-specific alpha-subunits of heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G-proteins) met more difficulties. Recent studies have shown that a sufficiently high GDP-affinity is critical for functional expression of xanthine nucleotide-selective G-protein mutants. Moreover, xanthosine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate and xanthosine 5'-[gamma, beta-imido]triphosphate are not functionally equivalent activators of D/N-G-protein mutants. We are now in the position to exploit xanthine nucleotide-specific G-proteins to dissect signaling pathways activated by a given G-protein in complex systems.