Variations of size and distribution in suspensions of sonicated phospholipid bilayers

Thermodynamics of lipid interactions with cell-penetrating peptides

Cationic peptides are efficiently taken up by biological cells through different pathways, which can be exploited for delivery of intracellular drugs. For example, their endocytosis is known since 1967, and this typically produces entrapment of the peptides in endocytotic vesicles. The resulting peptide (and cargo) degradation in lysosomes is of little therapeutic interest. Beside endocytosis (and various subtypes thereof), cationic cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) may also gain access to cytosol and nucleus of livings cells. This process is known since 1988, but it is poorly understood whether the cytosolic CPP appearance requires an active cellular machinery with membrane proteins and signaling molecules, or whether this translocation occurs by passive diffusion and thus can be mimicked with model membranes devoid of proteins or glycans. In the present chapter, protocols are presented that allow for testing the membrane binding and disturbance of CPPs on model membranes with special focus on particular CPP properties. Protocols include vesicle preparation, lipid quantification, and analysis of membrane leakage, lipid polymorphism ((31)P NMR), and membrane binding (isothermal titration calorimetry). Using these protocols, a major difference among CPPs is observed: At low micromolar concentration, nonamphipathic CPPs, such as nona-arginine (WR(9)) and penetratin, have only a poor affinity for model membranes with a lipid composition typical of eukaryotic membranes. No membrane leakage is induced by these compounds at low micromolar concentration. In contrast, their amphipathic derivatives, such as acylated WR(9) (C(14), C(16), C(18)) or amphipathic penetratin mutant p2AL (Drin et al., Biochemistry 40:1824-1834, 2001), bind and disturb lipid model membranes already at low micromolar peptide concentration. This suggests that the mechanism for cytosolic CPP delivery (and potential toxicity) differs among CPPs despite their common name.

A phospholipid spin label used as a liposome-associated MRI contrast agent

Given current clinical use of phospholipid bilayer structures (liposomes/vesicles) as nontoxic drug delivery vehicles, we have addressed the possibility of employing the phospholipids themselves as MRI contrast agents. To this end we have synthesized phosphatidylcholine with a nitroxide spin label replacing one methyl residue of the choline headgroup. This material was mixed with natural phosphatidylcholine in mole ratios from 1:50 to 1:1 and used to prepare sonicated unilamellar vesicles in saline. Expected structural features of these vesicles were verified by freeze-fracture electron microscopy. Proton T1 values of saline were readily decreased to less than 0.3 s by such preparations, yielding a net relaxivity of 0.6 M-1 s-1. The approach seems to be a realistic way of firmly associating a contrast agent of minimal toxicity with ordinary liposomes/vesicles in a manner that is not subject to leakage.

Lipid-protein interactions in the plasma lipoproteins

The purpose of this review has been to discuss new information about the mechanism of lipid and apoprotein interaction in the plasma lipoproteins. A special form of the amphipathic helix has been identified as a major structural element of the apolipoproteins sequenced to date. Evidence is reviewed concerning the role of the amphipathic helix in the binding to phospholipids. Several different models for the organization of the components of HDL, LDL and LP-X have evolved from extensive structural studies. Resolution of the differences among these models will require additional experimental testing. Verification of models based on the study of reconstituted HDL will require rigorous proof of native structure in these particles. A detailed description of the molecular organization of the lipid and protein constituents of the plasma lipoproteins is still lacking. Further structural and sequence studies with apoB and the "arginine-rich" protein are needed. Crystallization of an apoprotein or lipoprotein and determination of the three-dimensional structure would be a major achievement. With such further detailed structural information, it may then be possible to correlate changes in structure with determinants of metabolism.

Protein-catalyzed exchange of phosphatidylcholine between sonicated liposomes and multilamellar vesicles

Phospholipid exchange protein from beef heart or beef liver does not catalyze the transfer of phosphatidylcholine from multilamellar vesicles of phosphatidylcholine. Certain combinations of phospholipids, however, do yield multilamellar vesicles that will exchange phosphatidylcholine with liposomes in the presence of exchange protein. Multilamellar vesicles of phosphatidylcholine:phosphatidylethanolamine:cardiolipin (70:25:5, mol%) can be used in place of mitochondria or erythrocyte ghosts as an improved acceptor particle in the study of liposome structure with phospholipid exchange proteins. These multilamellar vesicles act as a well-defined reservoir of unlabeled phosphatidylcholine with 7% exchangable phospholipid. When the distribution of phosphatidylcholine in liposomes is studied by the exchange protein technique, results can be influence by the choice of phospholipid acceptor particle. With mitochondria as acceptor particle, the percentage of phosphatidylcholine in the outer monolayer of a liposome appears to be 60%, whereas a value of 70% is obtained when multilamellar vesicles are the acceptor. The discrepancy can be explained by a heterogeneity in liposomes prepared by sonication. A size-dependent fusion or adsorption process occurs between liposomes and mitochondria; the very small liposomal vesicles, obtained by gel filtration, combine nearly quantitatively with the natural membrane. This phenomenon is not seen with multilamellar vesicles. Thus by using multilamellar vesicles one obtains a less biased estimate of phospholipid distribution between inner and outer layers of liposomes.

Transbilayer distribution and movement of lysophosphatidylcholine in liposomal membranes

Single bilayer vesicles were prepared by sonication of 5 mol% 1-palmitoyl lysophosphatidylcholine and 95 mol% egg phosphatidylcholine. Incubation with lysophospholipase results in a fast hydrolysis of 80-90% of lysophosphatidylcholine. The remaining lysophosphatidylcholine is only very slowly hydrolysed. There results are interpreted as lysophosphatidylcholine being asymmetrically distributed over the two halves of the bilayer. The slow phase of lysophosphatidylcholine hydrolysis sets an upper limit to the rate of transbilayer movement of lysophosphatidylcholine. The half time of this process at 37 degrees C is estimated to be about 100 h. Incorporation of cholesterol in the vesicles reduces the distributional asymmetry of lysophosphatidylcholine to the extent of an outside-inside ratio of 60 : 40 [14C]Lysophosphatidylcholine introduced into the outer monolayer of such vesicles by intervesicular transfer of lysophosphatidylcholine remains virtually completely available for hydrolysis by lysophospholipases, corroborating the interpretation that transbilayer movement of lysophosphatidylcholine in these vesicles is an extremely slow process. In handshaken liposomes consisting of 5 mol% 1-palmitoyl lysophosphatidylcholine and 95 mol% egg phosphatidylcholine 15-20% of lysophosphatidylcholine is readily available for exogenous lysophospholipase. This pool may represent lysophosphatidylcholine in the outer monolayer of the liposomes.

On the quantitative interpretation of biomembrane structure by Raman spectroscopy

The now well-established use of Raman spectroscopy to examine the structure of biomembranes is extended through an examination of the origins of the structure-sensitive features of phospholipid spectra and the development of quantitative order-parameters. One parameter gives a quantitative measure of the fraction of all-trans bonds in the hydrocarbon chains while the other provides a semiquantitative estimate of the lateral crystal-like order between the chains. The parameters are used to study the differences between vesicles and dispersions of dipalmitoyl phosphotidylcholine, dimyristoylcholine and egg lecithin. We find that the vesicles of dipalmitoyl phosphotidylcholine are substantially less ordered than the dispersions in terms of both longitudinal and lateral order which are greatly decreased. A very careful measurement of the order as a function of temperature shows that there is a pre-melting transition in the dispersions of dipalmitoyl phosphotidylcholine which does not exist in the vesicles. Remarkable agreement is obtained between the Raman technique and that previously reported by calorimetric measurements and theoretical calculations.

Interaction of apoliprotein C-III with phosphatidylcholine vesicles. Dependence of aproprotein-phospholipid complex formation on vesicle structure

We have studied the interaction of an apolipoprotein from human very low density lipoproteins (apoC-III) with egg yolk phosphatidylcholine in the form of single- and multi-bilayer vesicles. The reactivity of single-bilayer vesicles with apoC-III appears to be greater than that of the multi-bilayer vesicles according to several thermodynamic and spectrosconic criteria. In the complexes formed by the association of apoC-III with single-bilayer vesicles, the alpha-helical content of the peptide backbone and the apolarity of the environment around the tryptophan residues are greater than that observed in the complexes formed with the multibilayer vesicles. A higher yield and more homogeneous density distribution of lipid-apoprotein complexes results from the interaction of apoC-III with the single-bilayer vesicles relative to those obtained with the multi-bilayer vesicles. The enthalpy of association of apoC-III with phospholipid was greater for the single-shelled vesicles (25 kcal/mol apoC-III) than for the multi-shelled ones (18 kcal/mol apoC-III). The difference in reactivity of these two types of liposomes is not due to a difference in their fluidities since their fatty acid compositions are identical, but may be due to a difference in their areas of sterically accessible phospholipid, their permeabilities to the apoprotein, their radii of curvation, or a combination of these factors.