Pharmacological differences among CysLT(1) receptor antagonists with respect to LTC(4) and LTD(4) in human lung parenchyma

Effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and other eicosanoid pathway modifiers on antiviral and allergic responses: EAACI task force on eicosanoids consensus report in times of COVID-19

Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and other eicosanoid pathway modifiers are among the most ubiquitously used medications in the general population. Their broad anti‐inflammatory, antipyretic, and analgesic effects are applied against symptoms of respiratory infections, including SARS‐CoV‐2, as well as in other acute and chronic inflammatory diseases that often coexist with allergy and asthma. However, the current pandemic of COVID‐19 also revealed the gaps in our understanding of their mechanism of action, selectivity, and interactions not only during viral infections and inflammation, but also in asthma exacerbations, uncontrolled allergic inflammation, and NSAIDs‐exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD). In this context, the consensus report summarizes currently available knowledge, novel discoveries, and controversies regarding the use of NSAIDs in COVID‐19, and the role of NSAIDs in asthma and viral asthma exacerbations. We also describe here novel mechanisms of action of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs), outline how to predict responses to LTRA therapy and discuss a potential role of LTRA therapy in COVID‐19 treatment. Moreover, we discuss interactions of novel T2 biologicals and other eicosanoid pathway modifiers on the horizon, such as prostaglandin D2 antagonists and cannabinoids, with eicosanoid pathways, in context of viral infections and exacerbations of asthma and allergic diseases. Finally, we identify and summarize the major knowledge gaps and unmet needs in current eicosanoid research.

Classification models and SAR analysis on CysLT1 receptor antagonists using machine learning algorithms

Cysteinyl leukotrienes 1 (CysLT1) receptor is a promising drug target for rhinitis or other allergic diseases. In our study, we built classification models to predict bioactivities of CysLT1 receptor antagonists. We built a dataset with 503 CysLT1 receptor antagonists which were divided into two groups: highly active molecules (IC₅₀ < 1000 nM) and weakly active molecules (IC₅₀ ≥ 1000 nM). The molecules were characterized by several descriptors including CORINA descriptors, MACCS fingerprints, Morgan fingerprint and molecular SMILES. For CORINA descriptors and two types of fingerprints, we used the random forests (RF) and deep neural networks (DNN) to build models. For molecular SMILES, we used recurrent neural networks (RNN) with the self-attention to build models. The accuracies of test sets for all models reached 85%, and the accuracy of the best model (Model 2C) was 93%. In addition, we made structure-activity relationship (SAR) analyses on CysLT1 receptor antagonists, which were based on the output from the random forest models and RNN model. It was found that highly active antagonists usually contained the common substructures such as tetrazoles, indoles and quinolines. These substructures may improve the bioactivity of the CysLT1 receptor antagonists.

G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Asthma Therapy: Pharmacology and Drug Action

Asthma is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease of the airways that is associated with airway hyperresponsiveness and airflow limitation. Although asthma was once simply categorized as atopic or nonatopic, emerging analyses over the last few decades have revealed a variety of asthma endotypes that are attributed to numerous pathophysiological mechanisms. The classification of asthma by endotype is primarily routed in different profiles of airway inflammation that contribute to bronchoconstriction. Many asthma therapeutics target G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which either enhance bronchodilation or prevent bronchoconstriction. Short-acting and long-acting β 2-agonists are widely used bronchodilators that signal through the activation of the β 2-adrenergic receptor. Short-acting and long-acting antagonists of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are used to reduce bronchoconstriction by blocking the action of acetylcholine. Leukotriene antagonists that block the signaling of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 are used as an add-on therapy to reduce bronchoconstriction and inflammation induced by cysteinyl leukotrienes. A number of GPCR-targeting asthma drug candidates are also in different stages of development. Among them, antagonists of prostaglandin D2 receptor 2 have advanced into phase III clinical trials. Others, including antagonists of the adenosine A2B receptor and the histamine H4 receptor, are in early stages of clinical investigation. In the past decade, significant research advancements in pharmacology, cell biology, structural biology, and molecular physiology have greatly deepened our understanding of the therapeutic roles of GPCRs in asthma and drug action on these GPCRs. This review summarizes our current understanding of GPCR signaling and pharmacology in the context of asthma treatment. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although current treatment methods for asthma are effective for a majority of asthma patients, there are still a large number of patients with poorly controlled asthma who may experience asthma exacerbations. This review summarizes current asthma treatment methods and our understanding of signaling and pharmacology of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in asthma therapy, and discusses controversies regarding the use of GPCR drugs and new opportunities in developing GPCR-targeting therapeutics for the treatment of asthma.

Position statement of the Brazilian Academy of Rhinology on the use of antihistamines, antileukotrienes, and oral corticosteroids in the treatment of inflammatory sinonasal diseases

Introduction

Inflammatory conditions of the nose and paranasal sinuses are very prevalent in the general population, resulting in marked loss of quality of life in affected patients, as well as significant work, leisure, and social activity losses. These patients require specific and specialized treatment. A wide range of oral medications are available.

Objective

The present document is aimed to clarify, for professionals treating patients with inflammatory sinonasal diseases, both specialists and general practitioners, specific oral therapies in noninfectious nasal inflammatory conditions.

Methods

The methodology used to create this article included the search for the key words: oral corticosteroids, antihistamines, antileukotrienes, rhinitis, rhinosinusitis in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases in the last 5 years. Since no relevant article was found for the text on the subject of interest in the last 5 years, the search was extended for another 5 years, and so on, according to the authors’ needs.

Results

Relevant literature was found regarding the use of antihistamines, antileukotrienes and oral corticosteroids in these conditions. The Brazilian Academy of Rhinology emphasizes, after extensive discussion by the collegiate, key points in the treatment with these drugs.

Conclusion

There is support in the literature for the use of these drugs; however, final considerations about the role of each of them have been made.

Update on leukotriene, lipoxin and oxoeicosanoid receptors: IUPHAR Review 7

The endogenous ligands for the LT, lipoxin (LX) and oxoeicosanoid receptors are bioactive products produced by the action of the lipoxygenase family of enzymes. The LT receptors BLT1 and BLT2 , are activated by LTB4 and the CysLT1 and CysLT2 receptors are activated by the cysteinyl-LTs, whereas oxoeicosanoids exert their action through the OXE receptor. In contrast to these pro-inflammatory mediators, LXA4 transduces responses associated with the resolution of inflammation through the receptor FPR2/ALX (ALX/FPR2). The aim of the present review is to give a state of the field on these receptors, with focus on recent important findings. For example, BLT1 receptor signalling in cancer and the dual role of the BLT2 receptor in pro- and anti-inflammatory actions have added more complexity to lipid mediator signalling. Furthermore, a cross-talk between the CysLT and P2Y receptor systems has been described, and also the presence of novel receptors for cysteinyl-LTs, such as GPR17 and GPR99. Finally, lipoxygenase metabolites derived from ω-3 essential polyunsaturated acids, the resolvins, activate the receptors GPR32 and ChemR23. In conclusion, the receptors for the lipoxygenase products make up a sophisticated and tightly controlled system of endogenous pro- and anti-inflammatory signalling in physiology and pathology.

A review on leukotrienes and their receptors with reference to asthma

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

Leukotrienes (LTs) including cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) and LTB4 are the most potent inflammatory lipid mediators and play a central role in the pathophysiology of asthma and other inflammatory diseases. These biological molecules mediate a plethora of contractile and inflammatory responses through specific interaction with distinct G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The main objective of this review is to present an overview of the biological effects of CysLTs and their receptors, along with the current knowledge of mechanisms and role of LTs in the pathogenesis of asthma.

RESULTS

CysLTs including LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4 are ligands for CysLT1 and CysLT2 receptors, and LTB4 is the agonist for BLT1 and BLT2 receptors. The role of CysLT1 receptor is well established, and most of the pathophysiological effects of CysLTs in asthma are mediated by CysLT1 receptor. Several CysLT1 antagonists have been developed to date and are currently in clinical practice. Most common among them are classical CysLT1 receptor antagonists such as montelukast, zafirlukast, pranlukast, pobilukast, iralukast, cinalukast and MK571. The pharmacological role of CysLT2 receptor, however, is less defined and there is no specific antagonist available so far. The recent demonstration that mice lacking both known CysLT receptors exhibit full/augmented response to CysLT points to the existence of additional subtypes of CysLT receptors. LTB4, on the other hand, is another potent inflammatory leukotriene, which acts as a strong chemoattractant for neutrophils, but weaker for eosinophils. LTB4 is known to play an important role in the development of airway hyper-responsiveness in severe asthma. However there is no LTB4 antagonist available in clinic to date.

CONCLUSION

This review gives a recent update on the LTs including their biosynthesis, biological effects and the role of anti-LTs in the treatment of asthma. It also discusses about the possible existence of additional subtypes of CysLT receptors.

Montelukast in the treatment of asthma and beyond

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting over 300 million people worldwide. The common association with allergic rhinitis and the presence of proinflammatory cells and mediators in the circulation of patients qualify asthma as a systemic disease. This characteristic and the fact that the gold-standard therapy for persistent asthma, inhaled corticosteroids, cannot suppress all components of airway inflammation and fail to adequately penetrate into the small airways, warrant the quest for effective systemic anti-asthma therapies. This review describes the most important controlled studies of montelukast, a once-daily leukotriene receptor antagonist, in asthma and allergic rhinitis in both adults and children. Montelukast is a systemically active drug with a targeted, dual mechanism of action, acting both as a bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory. In patients of all ages, montelukast has shown a favorable safety profile and was well-tolerated. Both as monotherapy or in combination with inhaled corticosteroids, montelukast produced clinically relevant improvements in asthma-related parameters, including symptoms, lung function parameters, quality of life and the number of asthma exacerbations. Furthermore, bronchoprotective effects have been reported both against specific and nonspecific bronchoactive stimuli. Similarly, in patients with allergic rhinitis, montelukast produced substantial improvements in symptoms and quality of life. Long-term studies aimed to determine its effects on airway remodeling are still lacking.

Montelukast in the treatment of asthma as a systemic disease

Asthma affects 300 million people worldwide. The common association of asthma with allergic rhinitis and the presence of proinflammatory mediators in the circulation of patients provide strong evidence for the need to treat asthma as a systemic disease. The leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast is a disease-specific oral medication that has dual effects on airway smooth muscle cells and inflammatory processes. This review describes recent randomized, controlled studies of montelukast in asthma and allergic rhinitis in adults and children as young as 3 months old. Montelukast treatment consistently produced significant reductions in asthma exacerbations. While many patients may benefit from montelukast as monotheray, combination treatment for chronic asthma with inhaled corticosteroids is advocated as being rational. Significant improvements in symptoms and quality of life were observed in allergic rhinitis patients. Montelukast is well tolerated in patients of all ages. Long-term studies are underway to determine its effects on airway remodeling.

Characterization of enzymes responsible for biotransformation of the new antileukotrienic drug quinlukast in rat liver microsomes and in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes

The promising new drug quinlukast, 4-(4-(quinoline-2′-yl-methoxy)phenylsulphanyl)benzoic acid (VÚFB 19363), is under investigation for its anti-inflammatory and anti-asthmatic effects. The main metabolite of quinlukast identified in incubations of rat microsomal fraction, and in primary culture of rat hepatocytes, is quinlukast sulfoxide (M2). Also, several other metabolites of quinlukast were found: two dihydrodiol derivatives (M3, M5) and quinlukast sulfone (M4). This study was conducted to characterize the enzymes involved in quinlukast biotransformation in rat in-vitro. Primary cultures of rat hepatocytes were treated with inducers of different cytochrome P450s (CYPs) for 48 h. Quinlukast (100 μm) was incubated for 24 h in a primary culture of induced or control hepatocytes. The effects of CYP inhibitors, ketoconazole, methylpyrazole, metyrapone and α-naphthoflavone (2, 10, 50 μm), on quinlukast metabolism were tested in induced and control hepatocytes. Significant induction of M2 (6 times), M5 (twice) and M3 (by 50%) formation by dexamethasone and strong concentration-dependent inhibition by ketoconazole indicated that CYP3A participates in formation of these metabolites. CYP1A catalyses formation of metabolite M3 mainly, as β-naphthoflavone induced (10 times) production of M3 and a strong inhibitory effect of α-naphthoflavone on its formation was observed. A significant inhibitory effect of quinlukast (2, 10, 50 μm) on ethoxyresorufin, methoxyresorufin and benzyloxyresorufin O-dealkylase activity was observed as well.

Leukotriene pathways and in vitro adenotonsillar cell proliferation in children with obstructive sleep apnea

INTRODUCTION

The abundant expression of leukotrienes (LTs) and their receptors in adenotonsillar tissues of children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) suggest that LT antagonists could be useful in treating OSA.

METHODS

The effects of LTD4 and of LT receptor antagonists zileuton, montelukast, and BAY u9773 were examined on mixed cell cultures prepared from dissociated tonsils or adenoids harvested intraoperatively from children with polysomnographically diagnosed OSA. Proliferation was assessed by (3)[H]-thymidine incorporation, and inflammatory cytokine production (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-alpha, interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-12) was assessed in supernatants using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

LTD4 elicited dose-dependent increases in adenotonsillar cell proliferation (p < 0.001; n = 12). All LT antagonists exhibited dose-dependent reductions in adenotonsillar cellular proliferation rates, with montelukast more than BAY u9773 more than zileuton (n = 14/group; p < 0.001). However, BAY u9773 showed partial agonist effects and increased cellular proliferation at higher concentrations (10(-4) mmol/L; p < 0.01; n = 12). LTD4 effects were partially blocked by montelukast and BAY u9773 but not by zileuton. All three antagonists reduced TNF-alpha, IL-6, and IL-12 concentrations, with selective changes in IL-8 and no effects on IL-10 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

LT pathways mediate intrinsic proliferative and inflammatory signaling pathways in adenotonsillar tissues from children with OSA, and targeted pharmacologic disruption of these pathways may provide nonsurgical alternatives for prevention and treatment of this disease.

Cysteinyl leukotriene receptor CysLT1 as a novel therapeutic target for allergic rhinitis treatment

BACKGROUND

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (cys-LTs) play an important role in allergic rhinitis because CysLT(1) receptor antagonists relieve the symptoms of allergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE

I overview the clinical pharmacology of CysLT(1) receptor antagonists and their potential role in patients with allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

I review the evidence regarding the release of cys-LTs and localization of CysLT(1) receptor on nasal mucosa, and evaluate the clinical efficacy of CysLT(1) receptor antagonist in allergic rhinitis.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Immunohistochemical studies show that in allergic rhinitis, the major target of CysLT(1) receptor antagonists are the vascular bed and infiltrated leukocytes such as mast cells, eosinophils and macrophages. CysLT(1) receptor antagonists provide a new opportunity for simultaneous management of allergic diseases of the upper and lower respiratory tract.

Cysteinyl-leukotrienes and their receptors in asthma and other inflammatory diseases: critical update and emerging trends

Cysteinyl-leukotrienes (cysteinyl-LTs), that is, LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4, trigger contractile and inflammatory responses through the specific interaction with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) belonging to the purine receptor cluster of the rhodopsin family, and identified as CysLT receptors (CysLTRs). Cysteinyl-LTs have a clear role in pathophysiological conditions such as asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR), and have been implicated in other inflammatory conditions including cardiovascular diseases, cancer, atopic dermatitis, and urticaria. Molecular cloning of human CysLT1R and CysLT2R subtypes has confirmed most of the previous pharmacological characterization and identified distinct expression patterns only partially overlapping. Interestingly, recent data provide evidence for the immunomodulation of CysLTR expression, the existence of additional receptor subtypes, and of an intracellular pool of CysLTRs that may have roles different from those of plasma membrane receptors. Furthermore, genetic variants have been identified for the CysLTRs that may interact to confer risk for atopy. Finally, a crosstalk between the cysteinyl-LT and the purine systems is being delineated. This review will summarize and attempt to integrate recent data derived from studies on the molecular pharmacology and pharmacogenetics of CysLTRs, and will consider the therapeutic opportunities arising from the new roles suggested for cysteinyl-LTs and their receptors.

Heterogeneous effect of leucotriene CysLT1receptor antagonists on antigen-induced motor and inflammatory responses in guinea-pig airways

1. The effect of montelukast or MEN91507, selective leucotriene CysLT1 receptor antagonists, on antigen-induced airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction were compared in anaesthetized guinea-pigs. 2. In sensitized animals, ovalbumin (0.3 mg kg(-1), i.v.)-induced microvascular leakage in trachea, intrapulmonary airways, total lung (parenchyma and intrapulmonary airways) and urinary bladder was reduced by MEN91507 (0.01-1 micromol kg(-1), i.v.), whereas montelukast (0.01-1 micromol kg(-1), i.v.) antagonized the effect of the antigen only in the lung and urinary bladder. 3. Ovalbumin (1 mg kg(-1), i.v.)-induced bronchoconstriction was dose dependently antagonized by MEN91507 (10-30 micromol kg(-1), i.v.), whereas the effect of montelukast (0.1-30 micromol kg(-1), i.v.) was marginal (15-30% inhibition). Neither MEN91507 nor montelukast (30 micromol kg(-1), i.v.) affected the bronchoconstrictor response induced by acetylcholine (0.3 micromol kg(-1), i.v.) in sensitized animals. 4. It is concluded that montelukast and MEN91507 display a differential activity against the effect of endogenous leucotrienes, despite the fact that both compounds show a similar antagonist profile against exogenous leucotrienes acting through CysLT1 receptors.

Determination of structure and transcriptional regulation of CYSLTR1 and an association study with asthma and rhinitis

Pharmacologic studies have revealed that cysteinyl leukotrienes (CYSLTs) act through two receptors, cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 (CYSLTR1) and CYSLTR2. CYSLTR1 antagonists are widely used to treat asthma and rhinitis. In this study, we characterized the genomic structure and transcriptional regulation of CYSLTR1 and examined associations between CYSLTR1 polymorphisms and asthma/rhinitis. The experiment of rapid amplification of cDNA end revealed that CYSLTR1 contains three exons and that the entire open reading frame is located in exon 3. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction showed that there were multiple splice variants of CYSLTR1 and that the transcript expression patterns differed from tissues and cell types. The promoter region of CYSLTR1 is from -665 to -30 bp relative to the transcription start site. We identified four polymorphisms (c.-618-434T/C, c.-618-275C/A, c.-618-136G/A, and 927C/T), and transmission disequilibrium tests revealed that none of these polymorphisms was associated with the development of asthma/rhinitis. However, the TCG and CAA haplotypes in the promoter region caused different transcriptional activity. Our findings indicate that CYSLTR1 polymorphisms are not likely to be involved in the development of asthma/rhinitis, but it is possible that these polymorphisms could influence drug responses in individuals with atopic diseases.

CysLT1 receptor is a target for extracellular nucleotide-induced heterologous desensitization: a possible feedback mechanism in inflammation

Both cysteinyl-leukotrienes and extracellular nucleotides mediate inflammatory responses via specific G-protein-coupled receptors, the CysLT and the P2Y receptors, respectively. Since these mediators accumulate at sites of inflammation, and inflammatory cells express both classes of receptors, their responses are likely to be crossregulated. We investigated the molecular basis of desensitization and trafficking of the CysLT1 receptor constitutively and transiently expressed in the human monocyte/macrophage-like U937 or COS-7 cells in response to LTD4 or nucleotides. Exposure to agonist induced a rapid homologous desensitization of the CysLT1 receptor [as measured by the reduction in the maximal agonist-induced intracellular cytosolic Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) transient], followed by receptor internalization (as assessed by equilibrium binding and confocal microscopy). Activation of P2Y receptors with ATP or UDP induced heterologous desensitization of the CysLT1 receptor. Conversely, LTD4-induced CysLT1 receptor activation had no effect on P2Y receptor responses, which suggests that the latter have a hierarchy in producing desensitizing signals. Furthermore, ATP/UDP-induced CysLT1 receptor desensitization was unable to cause receptor internalization, induced a faster recovery of CysLT1 functionality and was dependent upon protein kinase C. By contrast, homologous desensitization, which is probably dependent upon G-protein-receptor kinase 2 activation, induced a fast receptor downregulation and, accordingly, a slower recovery of CysLT1 functionality. Hence, CysLT1 receptor desensitization and trafficking are differentially regulated by the CysLT1 cognate ligand or by extracellular nucleotides. This crosstalk may have a profound physiological implication in the regulation of responses at sites of inflammation, and may represent just an example of a feedback mechanism used by cells to fine-tune their responses.

Blockade of leukotriene B4 prevents articular incapacitation in rat zymosan-induced arthritis

We investigated whether leukotrienes mediate cell influx and articular incapacitation in zymosan-induced arthritis. Rats received 1 mg zymosan intra-articularly (i.a.). The hyperalgesia was measured using the rat articular incapacitation test. Cell influx, leukotriene B(4) and prostaglandin E(2) levels were assessed in the joint exudate, at 6 h. Groups received either the leukotriene B(4) synthesis inhibitor MK 886 (3-[1-(4-chlorobenzyl)-3-t-butyl-thio-5-isopropylindol-2-yl)]-2,2-dimethylpropanoic acid 30 min before or 2 h after the zymosan; 0.3-3 mg kg(-1) i.p.), the leukotrienes synthesis inhibitor BWA(4)C (N-(3-phenoxycinnamyl)-acetohydroxamic acid--2 h after the zymosan; 10 microg i.a.) or the peptido-leukotrienes antagonist sodium montelukast (30 min before and 2 h after the zymosan; 10 mg kg(-1) per os). MK 886 inhibited the articular incapacitation and cell influx, while reducing leukotriene B(4), but not prostaglandin E(2) levels. BWA(4)C inhibited the articular incapacitation. Sodium montelukast did not affect either of the parameters. The data suggest that leukotriene B(4) is involved in cell influx and articular incapacitation in zymosan arthritis.

Treatment of chronic cough in children with montelukast,a leukotriene receptor antagonist

Twenty-two children (13 boys and 9 girls) with chronic cough were treated with the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast (Singulair tbl. 5 mg) administered once daily for four weeks. In 14 children (68%), the cough ceased during the third week of treatment. Children responding to montelukast were found to have higher blood levels of eosinophil cationic protein (S-ECP) in the pretreatment blood sample than children with no response (responders 14.88+/-2.651 microg/l versus nonresponders 6.62+/-0.948 microg/l; p<0.01). Blood S-ECP levels remained higher also in the post-treatment blood sample in responders (10.55+/-1.631 microg/l) compared to nonresponders (6.13+/-0.937 microg/l; p<0.05). The difference is statistically significant. There were also differences in absolute eosinophil blood count and IgE blood levels between the two groups in the pretreatment blood sample. Using 24-hour pH-metry, two children not responding to therapy were subsequently diagnosed to have gastroesophageal reflux. Judging from the results, one might deduct that patients with chronic cough who have increased levels of serum ECP and absolute eosinophil blood counts are likely to benefit from treatment with montelukast.

Montelukast, a Cysteinyl Leukotriene Receptor-1 Antagonist, Dose- and Time-Dependently Protects against Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Mice

Our previous studies showed that cysteinyl leukotriene receptor-1 (CysLT1) antagonist pranlukast has a neuroprotective effect on cerebral ischemia in rats and mice. However, whether the neuroprotective effect of pranlukast is its special action or a common action of CysLT1 receptor antagonists remains to be clarified. This study was performed to determine whether montelukast, another CysLT1 receptor antagonist, has the neuroprotective effect on focal cerebral ischemia in mice, and to observe its dose- and time-dependent properties. Permanent focal cerebral ischemia was induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Montelukast was injected intraperitoneally either as multiple doses (once a day for 3 days and 30 min before MCAO) or as a single dose (at 30 min before, 30 min after, or 1 h after MCAO), respectively, and pranlukast and edaravone were used as controls. The neurological deficits, infarct volumes, brain edema, neuron density, and Evans blue extravasation in the brain were determined 24 h after MCAO. Pretreatments with multiple doses or a single dose of montelukast (0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg) before MCAO significantly attenuated all the ischemic insults. Post-treatment with a single dose of montelukast (0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg) at 30 min after MCAO also significantly decreased brain edema and infarct volume, but not neurological deficits. However, post-treatment with a single dose of montelukast at 1 h after MCAO had no significant effect. Pranlukast showed the same effects as montelukast, but edaravone attenuated the ischemic insults only with multiple doses before MCAO. Thus, montelukast has a dose- and time-dependent neuroprotective effect on permanent focal cerebral ischemia in mice, with an effective dose range of 0.1-1.0 mg/kg and a therapeutic window of 30 min. These findings further support the therapeutic potential of CysLT1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of cerebral ischemia at earlier phases.

The quest for new cysteinyl-leukotriene and lipoxin receptors: recent clues

The metabolism of arachidonic acid via the 5-lipoxygenase enzymatic pathway leads to the formation of the cysteinyl-leukotrienes and lipoxins, which have been implicated in several inflammatory reactions. While these lipid mediators are responsible for a variety of effects, their actions occur through the activation of 3 specific types of cloned receptors (i.e., CysLT(1), CysLT(2), and ALX). Although receptor activation can explain several biological actions associated with the mediators, there is some evidence to suggest that not all responses fit the well-known characteristics of these cloned receptors. Other receptor subtypes may also exist. Interestingly, the indirect evidence for support of this observation is principally derived from work performed on either blood elements and/or vascular smooth muscle. Because the initiating events associated with inflammation are essentially of vascular origin, further work at the molecular level may be necessary to confirm the data, which do not fit the well-known CysLT and ALX receptor profiles.

Pranlukast: a review of its use in the management of asthma

Pranlukast (Onon, Azlaire), is an orally administered, selective, competitive antagonist of the cysteinyl leukotrienes (LT) C(4), LTD(4) and LTE(4). It is indicated for the prophylactic treatment of chronic bronchial asthma in paediatric and adult patients. The efficacy of pranlukast 225mg twice daily in adults with mild to moderate asthma was demonstrated in double-blind, placebo- or azelastine-controlled studies of 4 or 8 weeks' duration. The drug at this dosage was superior to both comparators in improving mean attack scores and morning and/or evening peak expiratory flow rates, and decreasing the use of rescue bronchodilators (p < 0.05). In limited clinical studies, pranlukast 225mg twice daily appeared to be as effective as montelukast 10mg once daily and zafirlukast 40mg twice daily in adults with mild to moderate asthma. Tachyphylaxis was absent when the drug was administered for up to 4 years. In patients requiring high-dose inhaled corticosteroid therapy, pranlukast 225 mg twice daily plus a halved dosage of inhaled corticosteroid was as effective as the original dosage of inhaled corticosteroid. Pranlukast was also effective in patients with mild to severe asthma in a clinical practice setting. In a double-blind trial, greater improvements in most outcome measures were observed with pranlukast than with oxatomide in children and adolescents with asthma. In clinical trials, pranlukast was well tolerated in adult and paediatric patients with asthma, with an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo. Gastrointestinal events and hepatic function abnormalities were the most commonly reported adverse events. No clinically significant differences in adverse event profiles between pranlukast, zafirlukast or montelukast were shown in limited comparisons. Although Churg-Strauss syndrome has been noted in pranlukast recipients, a direct causal relationship is unlikely.

CONCLUSIONS

Pranlukast is a well tolerated and effective preventative treatment in adult and paediatric patients with persistent asthma of all severities. In some patients, pranlukast may be beneficial when added to low-dose inhaled corticosteroids; it may also be a viable alternative to increasing inhaled corticosteroid dosages. The efficacy of pranlukast relative to placebo has been confirmed; its efficacy relative to other therapy awaits further investigation. Nonetheless, pranlukast is a useful therapeutic option (with as-required short-acting beta(2)-agonists), either as preventative monotherapy for the treatment of mild persistent asthma or in conjunction with inhaled corticosteroids in the management of moderate or severe persistent asthma.

Benefit-risk assessment of antileukotrienes in the management of asthma

Antileukotrienes are a relatively new class of anti-asthma drugs that either block leukotriene synthesis (5-lipoxygenase inhibitors) like zileuton, or antagonise the most relevant of their receptors (the cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptor [CysLT1]) like montelukast, zafirlukast or pranlukast. Hence, their major effect is an anti-inflammatory one. With the exception of pranlukast, the other antileukotrienes have been studied and marketed in the US and Europe for long enough to establish that they are useful drugs in the management of asthma. Their effects, significantly better than placebo, seem more pronounced in subjective measurements (i.e. symptoms scores or quality-of-life tests) than in objective parameters (i.e. forced expiratory volume in 1 second or peak expiratory flow rate). Also, there is some evidence that these drugs work better in some subsets of patients with certain genetic polymorphisms - probably related to their leukotriene metabolism - or patients with certain asthma characteristics. There are a small number of comparative studies only, and with regard to long-term asthma control differences between the agents have not been evaluated. Nevertheless, their overall effect appears comparable with sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) or theophylline, but significantly less than low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Antileukotrienes have been shown to have a degree of corticosteroid-sparing effect, but salmeterol appears to perform better as an add-on drug. Montelukast is probably the most useful antileukotriene for continuous treatment of exercise-induced asthma, performing as well as salmeterol without inducing any tolerance. All antileukotrienes are taken orally; their frequency of administration is quite different ranging from four times daily (zileuton) to once daily (montelukast). Antileukotrienes are well tolerated drugs, even though zileuton intake has been related to transitional liver enzyme elevations in some cases. Also Churg-Strauss syndrome (a systemic vasculitis), has been described in small numbers of patients taking CysLT1 antagonists. It is quite probable that this disease appears as a consequence of an 'unmasking' effect when corticosteroid dosages are reduced in patients with severe asthma once CysLT1 antagonists are introduced, but more data are needed to definitely establish the mechanism behind this effect. Overall, however, the benefits of antileukotrienes in the treatment of asthma greatly outweigh their risks.

International Union of Pharmacology XXXVII. Nomenclature for leukotriene and lipoxin receptors

The leukotrienes and lipoxins are biologically active metabolites derived from arachidonic acid. Their diverse and potent actions are associated with specific receptors. Recent molecular techniques have established the nucleotide and amino acid sequences and confirmed the evidence that suggested the existence of different G-protein-coupled receptors for these lipid mediators. The nomenclature for these receptors has now been established for the leukotrienes. BLT receptors are activated by leukotriene B(4) and related hydroxyacids and this class of receptors can be subdivided into BLT(1) and BLT(2). The cysteinyl-leukotrienes (LT) activate another group called CysLT receptors, which are referred to as CysLT(1) and CysLT(2). A provisional nomenclature for the lipoxin receptor has also been proposed. LXA(4) and LXB(4) activate the ALX receptor and LXB(4) may also activate another putative receptor. However this latter receptor has not been cloned. The aim of this review is to provide the molecular evidence as well as the properties and significance of the leukotriene and lipoxin receptors, which has lead to the present nomenclature.