Treatment of bipolar depression with carbamazepine: results of an open study

Mixed states in bipolar and major depressive disorders: systematic review and quality appraisal of guidelines

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review provided a critical synthesis and a comprehensive overview of guidelines on the treatment of mixed states.

METHOD

The MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched from inception to March 21st, 2018. International guidelines covering the treatment of mixed episodes, manic/hypomanic, or depressive episodes with mixed features were considered for inclusion. A methodological quality assessment was conducted with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-AGREE II.

RESULTS

The final selection yielded six articles. Despite their heterogeneity, all guidelines agreed in interrupting an antidepressant monotherapy or adding mood-stabilizing medications. Olanzapine seemed to have the best evidence for acute mixed hypo/manic/depressive states and maintenance treatment. Aripiprazole and paliperidone were possible alternatives for acute hypo/manic mixed states. Lurasidone and ziprasidone were useful in acute mixed depression. Valproate was recommended for the prevention of new mixed episodes while lithium and quetiapine in preventing affective episodes of all polarities. Clozapine and electroconvulsive therapy were effective in refractory mixed episodes. The AGREE II overall assessment rate ranged between 42% and 92%, indicating different quality level of included guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The unmet needs for the mixed symptoms treatment were associated with diagnostic issues and limitations of previous research, particularly for maintenance treatment.

Treatment of bipolar depression: focus on pharmacologic therapies

Recent studies have highlighted significant limitations in our capacity to effectively treat bipolar depression. This article reviews the present status of treatments for this condition, highlighting emerging new pharmacotherapies such as lamotrigine, olanzapine and quetiapine, while also addressing modern psychologic interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy and psychoeducation. The role of older treatments such as lithium and the antidepressants is also discussed, particularly as a recent meta-analysis has thrown into question current heightened concern over antidepressant-induced mania. The advent of new pharmacologic and psychologic treatments provides optimism for improved outcomes for this highly disabling condition.

[Bipolar depression: a review of current therapeutic strategies]

It is now acknowledged that depressive symptoms dominate the natural history of bipolar affective disorder. Treating bipolar depression therefore represents a major therapeutic issue that has paradoxically been understudied compared to the treatment of acute manic or hypomanic episodes. Thanks to a computerized and manual bibliographic search, we reviewed the literature pertaining to the somatic treatments of bipolar depression. It is initially advisable to implement or optimize the thymoregulator treatment by carrying out a blood titration and by adjusting the therapeutic rates as well as possible towards the upper recommended levels. In the second place, the adjunction of another mood stabilizer may be necessary to obtain euthymia while preventing a mood switch to mania. Atypical antipsychotics may have some efficacy in treating bipolar depression, but further evidence is needed. Antidepressants are generally prohibited due to the risk of induction of mania or rapid cycling. Their use is generally limited to severe cases in which the association of at least two mood stabilizers has failed.

The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for the Biological Treatment of Bipolar Disorders: Update 2010 on the treatment of acute bipolar depression

OBJECTIVES

These guidelines are based on a first edition that was published in 2002, and have been edited and updated with the available scientific evidence until September 2009. Their purpose is to supply a systematic overview of all scientific evidence pertaining to the treatment of acute bipolar depression in adults.

METHODS

The data used for these guidelines have been extracted from a MEDLINE and EMBASE search, from the clinical trial database clinicaltrials.gov, from recent proceedings of key conferences, and from various national and international treatment guidelines. Their scientific rigor was categorised into six levels of evidence (A-F). As these guidelines are intended for clinical use, the scientific evidence was finally assigned different grades of recommendation to ensure practicability.

RESULTS

We identified 10 pharmacological monotherapies or combination treatments with at least limited positive evidence for efficacy in bipolar depression, several of them still experimental and backed up only by a single study. Only one medication was considered to be sufficiently studied to merit full positive evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Although major advances have been made since the first edition of this guideline in 2002, there are many areas which still need more intense research to optimize treatment. The majority of treatment recommendations is still based on limited data and leaves considerable areas of uncertainty.

Adverse event load in bipolar participants receiving either carbamazepine immediate-release or extended-release capsules: a blinded, randomized study

In epilepsy, slow-release formulations of carbamazepine (CBZ) have fewer adverse events (AEs) compared with immediate-release (IR) formulations. As CBZ is used for mania, it is important to determine whether a similar pattern exists for bipolar patients. This was a 3-month, blinded, random-assignment study to an IR formulation or extended-release carbamazepine capsules (ERCC, Equetro) in type I or type II bipolar patients already on CBZ or clinically determined to benefit from it. Dosages were titrated to patients' clinical needs. Mood and AE ratings were performed at baseline and monthly for 3 months. There was no difference in mood ratings or in the total level of AEs in patients receiving IR or ERCC. However, autonomic AEs (5.0+/-1.1 vs. 2.0+/-0.7, P = 0.02) and gastrointestinal AEs (1.6+/-0.4 vs. 0.6+/-0.3, P = 0.05) were significantly less in participants receiving ERCC. CBZ level in patients receiving ERCC were higher (9.2+/-1.7 vs. IR 7.2+/-1.3 microg/ml, P = 0.005). Total AE load was directly related to CBZ level only in participants receiving the IR formulation. In conclusion, ERCC is better tolerated than IR CBZ in bipolar patients.

Carbamazepine and valproate for the treatment of bipolar disorder: a review of the literature

There are an increasing number of pharmacologic therapies for bipolar disorder. Two of these agents, the anticonvulsants carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate (VPA), were first developed over 30 years ago for the treatment of epilepsy, and subsequent studies demonstrated that they are also effective in the treatment of acute mania and suggest efficacy as maintenance therapy in bipolar disorder. Because VPA and CBZ have been in use for many years, the psychiatric community is familiar with the adverse event profiles of these agents. A review of the clinical data evaluating VPA and CBZ monotherapy for the treatment of acute mania suggests that VPA and CBZ are similarly effective in acute mania. However, when their respective adverse event profiles are considered, VPA may be more tolerable than CBZ for short-term use, while CBZ may be better suited for long-term therapy. Controlled and direct comparative studies, both short and long term, are needed to further clarify the differences between VPA and CBZ.

Extended-release carbamazepine capsules as monotherapy in bipolar disorder : pooled results from two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

Recently, two large, 3-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials using nearly identical protocols demonstrated that monotherapy with carbamazepine extended-release capsules (CBZ-ERC) was effective for the treatment of acute mania in patients with bipolar I disorder. By pooling data from these two trials, a more highly powered analysis of the efficacy and safety of CBZ-ERC in bipolar I disorder could be conducted.

METHODS

Efficacy was assessed with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity (CGI-S) scale, the CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) scale and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). A sub-analysis of the data based on manic versus mixed presentation was performed, as well as sub-analyses by age, sex and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Of the 443 randomised patients in the pooled population, 240 completed the studies. Forty-two percent of CBZ-ERC-treated patients did not complete the studies, compared with 50% of placebo-treated patients (p=0.087). Ten percent of patients given CBZ-ERC withdrew because of lack of efficacy, compared with 22% of patients given placebo (p<0.001). At endpoint, CBZ-ERC compared with placebo was associated with significant improvements in mean YMRS total scores in patients experiencing both manic (p<0.0001) and mixed (p<0.01) episodes, using last-observation-carried-forward analyses. CGI-I and CGI-S scores also showed significant improvements from baseline for both manic and mixed patients at endpoint. In patients with mixed episodes, at endpoint there was a mean improvement in HDRS total score of 4.8 points with CBZ-ERC, compared with 2.3 points with placebo (p<0.05). Ninety percent of patients given CBZ-ERC experienced an adverse event, compared with 64% of those patients given placebo. Discontinuation because of adverse events occurred in 10.8% of patients taking CBZ-ERC, compared with 5.5% of patients taking placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm previous findings that CBZ-ERC is effective in the treatment of bipolar I disorder patients with either acute manic or mixed episodes. These data suggest that further randomised controlled studies are warranted to delineate the effect of CBZ-ERC on depressive symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder.

[Mixed states in bipolar disorders: a review of current therapeutic strategies]

Mixed states are characterized by the mixture or rapid alternation, within hours, of manic and depressive symptoms. They bear a high suicidal risk and therefore represent a major therapeutic issue. We performed a computerized bibliographic search and reviewed the efficacy of the available treatments of mixed states. It confirmed the recognized poor efficacy of lithium and the need to discontinue antidepressants. Among mood stabilizers, divalproate and its derivatives are those with the highest level of evidence. As regards new anticonvulsants, the data are yet too limited to recommend them as first line treatments. They may however be used as second line or adjunct treatments in case a monotherapy with a reference treatment has failed. Among antipsychotic drugs, clozapine has demonstrated its efficacy but also remains a second line treatment due to its high risk of neutropenia and agranulocytosis. Electroconvulsive therapy is a useful alternative in treatment resistant cases or when there is an imminent risk for suicide. Some degree of uncertainty remains for the treatment of the so called "agitated depressions" as no study has yet focused on this issue with a specifically selected sample of patients. Such a study would also enlighten the uncertain nosological status of this clinical entity and would answer as to whether they belong to the category of mixed states.

Do recent efficacy data on the drug treatment of acute bipolar depression support the position that drugs other than antidepressants are the treatment of choice? A conceptual review

This conceptual review summarises the results of relevant studies on antidepressants, mood stabilisers such as lithium and anticonvulsants, and second generation antipsychotics in the indication of bipolar depression. Based on methodological and clinical considerations, the position of antidepressants and the possible alternatives in this indication are reviewed very carefully. In addition the regulatory requirements for licensing a drug for the indication "short-term treatment of bipolar depression" are described.

[Diagnosis and treatment of mixed states]

Mixed States are described in the literature using based on different definitions resulting in different descriptions of the clinical and demographic characteristics, of these episodes, but although they are always asdeemed a severe form of Bipolar disorder with worse prognosis and more prevalent than previously described. The aim of this article is to present a review of these different definitions and their impact on the study of mixed states. Pharmacological treatment is also discussed.

A review of acute treatments for bipolar depression

Bipolar patients generally spend much more time in the depressed phase of their illness than the manic phase, and there are many more bipolar type II and bipolar spectrum disorder patients than there are bipolar type I. Additionally, there is a significant risk of suicide in bipolar patients when depressed. The treatment of the depressed phase of bipolar disorder is therefore a matter of some priority. Here, we review current evidence supporting the use of five groups of treatments: anti-depressants; lithium; anti-convulsants (valproate, and carbamazepine, lamotrigine, gabapentin); anti-psychotics; and other treatments (electroconvulsive therapy, benzodiazepines, sleep-deprivation, and dopamine agonists). From this review, it is apparent that the literature regarding the treatment of bipolar depression is significantly limited in several key areas. Nonetheless, from the evidence currently available, the treatments with the best evidence for efficacy are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and lamotrigine. There is also some evidence in favour of bupropion and moclobemide. Although lithium and olanzapine monotherapies can also be beneficial, they appear less efficacious than antidepressants. One of the major concerns about treatment with antidepressants has been the risk of precipitating a switch into mania. However, recent studies suggest that, if a mood stabilizer and antidepressant are given concurrently, then the risk of switching is minimized. There is also recent evidence for an independent antidepressant action for at least one atypical antipsychotic. Therefore, the conclusion from this review, in contrast to previous suggestions, is that a combination of an atypical antipsychotic and either an SSRI or lamotrigine may provide a useful first-line treatment for depressed bipolar disorder patients. Further research is clearly required to examine this approach and compare it with other possible treatment options.

Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists is co-ordinating the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in psychiatry, funded under the National Mental Health Strategy (Australia) and the New Zealand Health Funding Authority

METHOD

For these guidelines, the CPG team reviewed the treatment outcome literature (including meta-analyses) and consulted with practitioners and consumers.

TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the management of bipolar disorder by phase of illness, that is acute mania, mixed episodes and bipolar depression, and the prophylaxis of such episodes. It specifies the roles of various mood-stabilizing medications and of psychological treatments such as cognitive therapy and psycho-education.

Determination of Carbamazepine and Its Metabolites in Aqueous Samples Using Liquid Chromatography−Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry

A quantitative method is described for solid-phase extraction (SPE) followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for the simultaneous analysis of carbamazepine and its five metabolites, 10,11-dihydro-10,11-epoxycarbamazepine, 10,11-dihydro-10,11-dihydroxycarbamazepine, 2-hydroxycarbamazepine, 3-hydroxycarbamazepine, and 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxycarbamazepine. An SPE procedure was used to concentrate target compounds from aqueous samples collected from sewage treatment plant (STP) wastewater and surface water. Extracts were analyzed using electrospray LC-MS/MS with time-scheduled selected reaction monitoring. The recoveries of the analytes were 83.6-102.2% from untreated sewage (influent), 90.6-103.5% from treated sewage (effluent), and 95.7-102.9% from surface water samples. The instrumental detection limits were 0.8-4.8 pg for the analytes. Matrix effects were investigated for the analytes in HPLC-grade water, surface water, and STP influent and effluent. Ion suppression increased for analytes in order of surface water to STP effluent to STP influent, but no ion suppression was observed for analytes in HPLC-grade water. The developed method was validated by analysis of environmental aqueous samples: STP influent and effluent and surface water. Carbamazepine and all five metabolites were detected in STP influent and effluent samples. Only carbamazepine and 10,11-dihydro-10,11-dihydroxycarbamazepine were detected in the surface water sample. Notably, 10,11-dihydro-10,11-dihydroxycarbamazepine was detected at approximately 3 times higher concentrations than the parent drug, carbamazepine, in all of the aqueous samples. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the simultaneous determination of carbamazepine and its metabolites in environmental samples.

Treatment of bipolar depression: current status, continued challenges, and the STEP-BD approach

Even though at least 10% (if not 20%) of those who experience a first lifetime episode of depression will subsequently develop bipolar disorder, the alliance of academic and industry research agendas that leads to developing and testing new antidepressants has failed to produce a sufficient knowledge base. It is therefore impossible to apply a truly empirical approach to guide the treatment of people with bipolar depression. Consequently, there are holes in contemporary evidenced-based practice guidelines large enough to drive a truck through; furthermore, there are some recommendations that have no factual basis other than expert opinion. However, with new research emerging on lamotrigine and olanzapine, in addition to the pending results of larger studies supported by the National Institute of Mental Health and the Stanley Foundation, there is evidence that some progress is being made.

Bipolar depression: management options

Bipolar depression is the predominant abnormal mood state in bipolar disorder. However, despite the key pertinence of this phase of the condition, the focus of research and indeed of clinical interest in the management of bipolar disorder has been mainly on mania. Bipolar depression has been largely neglected, and early studies often failed to distinguish depression due to major unipolar depression from that due to bipolar disorder. Consequently, many treatments used in the management of major depression have been adopted for use in bipolar depression without any robust evidence of efficacy. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), bupropion, tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors are all effective antidepressants in the management of bipolar depression. They are all associated with a small risk of antidepressant-induced mood instability. The mood stabilisers lithium, carbamazepine and valproate semisodium (divalproex sodium) all appear to have modest acute antidepressant properties. Among these, lithium is supported by the strongest data, but the use of lithium in the treatment of bipolar depression as a monotherapeutic agent is limited by its slow onset of action. Recently, there has been a growing body of evidence suggesting that lamotrigine may have particular effectiveness in both the acute and prophylactic management of bipolar depression. Clinical management of bipolar depression involves various combinations of antidepressants and mood stabilisers and is partly determined by the context in which the depressive episode occurs. In general, 'de novo' and 'breakthrough' (where the patient is already receiving medication) bipolar depression may be successfully managed by initiating mood stabiliser monotherapy, to which an antidepressant or second mood stabiliser may be added at a later date, if necessary. Breakthrough episodes of bipolar depression occurring in patients receiving combination therapy (two mood stabilisers or a mood stabiliser plus an antidepressant) require either switching of ongoing medications or further augmentation. If this fails, then novel strategies or ECT should be considered. Bipolar depression is a disabling illness and the predominant mood state for the vast majority of those with bipolar disorder. It therefore warrants prompt management once suitably diagnosed, especially as it is associated with a considerable risk of suicide and in the majority of instances is eminently treatable.

The expanding pharmacopoeia for bipolar disorder

Over the past decade, the number of treatments available for bipolar disorder has undergone an extraordinary expansion. In that period, valproate and olanzapine have received regulatory approval in the United States for the acute treatment of mania, and carbamazepine has been indicated for this condition in many other countries. In addition to those agents, a number of other anticonvulsants (in particular lamotrigine, gabapentin, and topiramate) are in trials, as are the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and risperidone, and other novel compounds. This article critically reviews the evidence from controlled trials of these proposed "mood stabilizers," highlighting the strengths and limitations of the data for each compound. A major challenge to the field is the capacity to prove the prophylactic properties of agents for which effectiveness in acute mania and/or bipolar depression has been demonstrated. Finally, as the mechanisms of agents such as lithium are now becoming apparent, and the possibility of understanding the molecular defects underpinning the condition is no longer highly fanciful, the prospect of targeted therapies is considered feasible by both academia and the pharmaceutical industry.

Anticonvulsants in the treatment of mood disorders: assessing current and future roles

Anticonvulsants are frequently used in the treatment of affective illnesses, especially for patients refractory to or intolerant of other treatments. The differential therapeutic roles of anticonvulsants, however, remain largely undetermined. The author reviews the available efficacy data for carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, valproate, lamotrigine, gabapentin and topiramate. Valproate is efficacious in the monotherapy of acute manic presentations but confirmatory evidence of the efficacy of valproate in long-term maintenance has been elusive. Valproate and possibly carbamazepine, may provide a therapeutic advantage over lithium in non-classic bipolar conditions such as mixed mood states and rapid cycling conditions. Lamotrigine is unique among the anticonvulsants in its monotherapy efficacy for bipolar I depression. Emerging data also suggest a role for lamotrigine in the adjunctive treatment of depressive mixed states and rapid cycling conditions in the absence of prominent manic symptoms. Controlled trials have found gabapentin ineffective for acute mania and refractory bipolar conditions. The role of gabapentin in the treatment of other aspects of affective illness remains uncertain. Definitive statements regarding the differential psychotropic use of topiramate and oxcarbazepine are not possible, though active investigation is underway to better characterise the utility of topiramate. The author suggests that current diagnostic models utilised in controlled trials may limit identification of differential therapeutic benefits. Caution is advised in generalising from the ability or inability of an agent to demonstrate antimanic activity. Future studies of newer anticonvulsants should include dimensional perspectives and soft bipolar presentations, as the greatest contribution of the newer anticonvulsants may be in treatment of mood conditions other than acute mania.

Pharmacotherapy of depression and mixed states in bipolar disorder

The treatment of bipolar depression requires the resolution of depression and the establishment of mood stability. A basic problem is that the treatments used in treating bipolar depression were developed and proven effective for other disease states: antidepressants for unipolar depression, and mood stabilizers for mania. The panel addressed four unresolved questions regarding depression in relation to bipolar disorder: (1) the relative effectiveness of different antidepressant treatments; (2) the relative likelihood of mood destabilization with different antidepressant treatments; (3) the effectiveness and role of mood-stabilizing medicines as antidepressants; and (4) the optimal approach to mixed states. The selection of an antidepressant depends both on its relative lack of mania- or hypomania-provoking potential and on its effectiveness against bipolar depression. There is little definitive evidence distinguishing effectiveness of the major groups of antidepressive agents, so side-effect profiles and pharmacokinetics are major considerations. The underlying bipolar disorder should be treated with mood stabilizers started simultaneously with any antidepressive treatments. Lithium, divalproex sodium and carbamazepine have all been found to be helpful, to some extent, in treating bipolar depressive episodes as well as for long-term mood stabilization. There is little evidence for long-term benefits of antidepressive agents in bipolar disorder, and some evidence that they may destabilize the disorder. Therefore, in contrast to the long-term use of mood-stabilizers, antidepressant use is recommended on a temporary basis. The duration of antidepressant treatment is determined by past history in terms of liability for mood destabilization, and by the ability of the patient to tolerate gradual antidepressant discontinuation without return of depression. Mixed states, where symptoms of depression and mania coexist, are regarded as a predictor of relatively poor response to lithium, and divalproex has been found to be more effective. Carbamazepine may too be useful in mixed states. Most patients with mixed states in actual practice require combinations of mood stabilizers, though there is little controlled data regarding such co-prescription, especially from a long-term perspective.

New perspectives in the acute treatment of bipolar depression

In contrast to mania, bipolar depression is usually characterised by longer-lasting episodes and a higher incidence of treatment refractoriness. Additionally, the risks of antidepressive standard treatment regimens are increasingly recognised, especially the risk of a switch into mania or induction of a rapid cycling course. Mood stabilisers, e.g. lithium, and some anticonvulsants, appear to have at least some antidepressant efficacy, which, however, may not be sufficient for treating severe depression. Currently, their use as a monotherapy of mild depression and at the start as a co-medication to antidepressants in severe depression is under consideration. The potential usefulness and risks of currently applied antidepressive treatment strategies as well as potential future developments will be reviewed in this article. At this stage, at least in severe depression, the use of true antidepressants still appears to be mandatory, especially because of the risk of suicide. However, initial combination with a mood stabiliser can be recommended. The treatment of depressive episodes only responsive to ECT should include combination with a mood stabiliser, in this case lithium, right from the start. In patients with lithium refractoriness, mood stabilising anticonvulsants should be initiated directly after the end of the ECT cycle. In order to reach sufficient plasma levels and thus reduce the risk of a switch, a loading therapy is recommended.

Algorithm for the treatment of mood disorders in Japan

In order to establish algorithms for mood disorders in Japan, over 300 psychiatrists completed a questionnaire. They were asked to recommend various drug treatments for particular cases. The order in which the drugs were recommended was taken into consideration. References were made to the randomized double blind study conducted by the working group. Evidence was ranked according to its probability, with the addition of case reports and medical opinions, since conclusions derived from the randomized double blind study alone did not give a full representation. Japanese documentation was referred to as much as possible in order to represent Japanese characteristics. Algorithms were made for eight subtypes; acute mania, bipolar depression, mild or moderate, severe major depression, psychotic depression, rapid cycling bipolar disorder, dysthymic disorder and major depression with advanced cancer. Major depression and bipolar disorder algorithms are discussed in this paper. Clinical psychopharmacological evidence in Japan was insufficient to generate these algorithms for mood disorders. These algorithms may need revision according to future advances in clinical psychopharmacology. (Int J Psych Clin Pract 1999; 3: 277-285).

The effect of oxcarbazepine on behavioural despair and learned helplessness

The effect of oxcarbazepine was evaluated in two tests of depression (forced swimming and learned helplessness) and in the open-field test. Acute (three times over 24 h) oxcarbazepine 80 mg/kg (but not 40 mg/kg) decreased immobility time in the forced swimming test. In the learned helplessness test, 4 days of treatment with oxcarbazepine 80 mg/kg reversed the deficits induced by foot-shock in rats submitted to the two-way active avoidance test. Oxcarbazepine 80 mg/kg did not modify the behaviour of rats in the open-field test, an indication that, at this dose, oxcarbazepine did not show a locomotor stimulatory effect. Thus, the data of the present study suggest that oxcarbazepine has a potential antidepressive effect.