Probing the proton channel and the retinal binding site of Natronobacterium pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II

Near-Infrared Activation of Sensory Rhodopsin II Mediated by NIR-to-Blue Upconversion Nanoparticles

Direct optical activation of microbial rhodopsins in deep biological tissue suffers from ineffective light delivery because visible light is strongly scattered and absorbed. NIR light has deeper tissue penetration, but NIR-activation requires a transducer that converts NIR light into visible light in proximity to proteins of interest. Lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) are ideal transducer as they absorb near-infrared (NIR) light and emit visible light. Therefore, UCNP-assisted excitation of microbial rhodopsins with NIR light has been intensively studied by electrophysiology technique. While electrophysiology is a powerful method to test the functional performance of microbial rhodopsins, conformational changes associated with the NIR light illumination in the presence of UCNPs remain poorly understood. Since UCNPs have generally multiple emission peaks at different wavelengths, it is important to reveal if UCNP-generated visible light induces similar structural changes of microbial rhodopsins as conventional visible light illumination does. Here, we synthesize the lanthanide-doped UCNPs that convert NIR light to blue light. Using these NIR-to-blue UCNPs, we monitor the NIR-triggered conformational changes in sensory rhodopsin II from Natronomonas pharaonis (NpSRII), blue light-sensitive microbial rhodospsin, by FTIR spectroscopy. FTIR difference spectrum of NpSRII was recorded under two different excitation conditions: (ⅰ) with conventional blue light, (ⅱ) with UCNP-generated blue light upon NIR excitation. Both spectra display similar spectral features characteristic of the long-lived M photointermediate state during the photocycle of NpSRII. This study demonstrates that NIR-activation of NpSRII mediated by UCNPs takes place in a similar way to direct blue light activation of NpSRII.

Conformational Dynamics of Sensory Rhodopsin II in Nanolipoprotein and Styrene-Maleic Acid Lipid Particles

Styrene-maleic acid lipid particles (SMALPs) provide stable water-soluble nanocontainers for lipid-encased membrane proteins. Possible effects of the SMA-stabilized lipid environment on the interaction dynamics between functionally coupled membrane proteins remain to be elucidated. The photoreceptor sensory rhodopsin II, NpSRII and its cognate transducer, NpHtrII, of Natronomonas pharaonis form a transmembrane complex, NpSRII₂ /NpHtrII₂ that plays a key role in negative phototaxis and provides a unique model system to study the light-induced transfer of a conformational signal between two integral membrane proteins. Photon absorption induces transient structural changes in NpSRII comprising an outward movement of helix F that cause further conformational alterations in NpHtrII. We applied site-directed spin labeling and time-resolved optical and EPR spectroscopy to compare the conformational dynamics of NpSRII₂ /NpHtrII₂ reconstituted in SMALPs with that of nanolipoprotein particle and liposome preparations. NpSRII and NpSRII₂ /NpHtrII₂ show similar photocycles in liposomes and nanolipoprotein particles. An accelerated decay of the M photointermediate found for SMALPs can be explained by a high local proton concentration provided by the carboxylic groups of the SMA polymer. Light-induced large-scale conformational changes of NpSRII₂ /NpHtrII₂ observed in liposomes and nanolipoprotein particles are affected in SMALPs, indicating restrictions of the protein's conformational freedom.

Microbial Rhodopsins

Microbial rhodopsins (MRs) are a large family of photoactive membrane proteins, found in microorganisms belonging to all kingdoms of life, with new members being constantly discovered. Among the MRs are light-driven proton, cation and anion pumps, light-gated cation and anion channels, and various photoreceptors. Due to their abundance and amenability to studies, MRs served as model systems for a great variety of biophysical techniques, and recently found a great application as optogenetic tools. While the basic aspects of microbial rhodopsins functioning have been known for some time, there is still a plenty of unanswered questions. This chapter presents and summarizes the available knowledge, focusing on the functional and structural studies.

Of ion pumps, sensors and channels - perspectives on microbial rhodopsins between science and history

We present a historical overview of research on microbial rhodopsins ranging from the 1960s to the present date. Bacteriorhodopsin (BR), the first identified microbial rhodopsin, was discovered in the context of cell and membrane biology and shown to be an outward directed proton transporter. In the 1970s, BR had a big impact on membrane structural research and bioenergetics, that made it to a model for membrane proteins and established it as a probe for the introduction of various biophysical techniques that are widely used today. Halorhodopsin (HR), which supports BR physiologically by transporting negatively charged Cl⁻ into the cell, is researched within the microbial rhodopsin community since the late 1970s. A few years earlier, the observation of phototactic responses in halobacteria initiated research on what are known today as sensory rhodopsins (SR). The discovery of the light-driven ion channel, channelrhodopsin (ChR), serving as photoreceptors for behavioral responses in green alga has complemented inquiries into this photoreceptor family. Comparing the discovery stories, we show that these followed quite different patterns, albeit the objects of research being very similar. The stories of microbial rhodopsins present a comprehensive perspective on what can nowadays be considered one of nature's paradigms for interactions between organisms and light. Moreover, they illustrate the unfolding of this paradigm within the broader conceptual and instrumental framework of the molecular life sciences. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Retinal Proteins - You can teach an old dog new tricks.

Molecular and evolutionary aspects of microbial sensory rhodopsins

Retinal proteins (~rhodopsins) are photochemically reactive membrane-embedded proteins, with seven transmembrane α-helices which bind the chromophore retinal (vitamin A aldehyde). They are widely distributed through all three biological kingdoms, eukarya, bacteria and archaea, indicating the biological significance of the retinal proteins. Light absorption by the retinal proteins triggers a photoisomerization of the chromophore, leading to the biological function, light-energy conversion or light-signal transduction. This article reviews molecular and evolutionary aspects of the light-signal transduction by microbial sensory receptors and their related proteins. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Retinal Proteins - You can teach an old dog new tricks.

Protein-protein interaction changes in an archaeal light-signal transduction

Negative phototaxis in Natronomonas pharaonis is initiated by transient interaction changes between photoreceptor and transducer. pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR; also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psR-II) and the cognate transducer protein, pHtrII, form a tight 2 : 2 complex in the unphotolyzed state, and the interaction is somehow altered during the photocycle of ppR. We have studied the signal transduction mechanism in the ppR/pHtrII system by means of low-temperature Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. In the paper, spectral comparison in the absence and presence of pHtrII provided fruitful information in atomic details, where vibrational bands were identified by the use of isotope-labeling and site-directed mutagenesis. From these studies, we established the two pathways of light-signal conversion from the receptor to the transducer; (i) from Lys205 (retinal) of ppR to Asn74 of pHtrII through Thr204 and Tyr199, and (ii) from Lys205 of ppR to the cytoplasmic loop region of pHtrII that links Gly83.

Phototactic and chemotactic signal transduction by transmembrane receptors and transducers in microorganisms

Microorganisms show attractant and repellent responses to survive in the various environments in which they live. Those phototaxic (to light) and chemotaxic (to chemicals) responses are regulated by membrane-embedded receptors and transducers. This article reviews the following: (1) the signal relay mechanisms by two photoreceptors, Sensory Rhodopsin I (SRI) and Sensory Rhodopsin II (SRII) and their transducers (HtrI and HtrII) responsible for phototaxis in microorganisms; and (2) the signal relay mechanism of a chemoreceptor/transducer protein, Tar, responsible for chemotaxis in E. coli. Based on results mainly obtained by our group together with other findings, the possible molecular mechanisms for phototaxis and chemotaxis are discussed.

The lifetimes of Pharaonis phoborhodopsin signaling states depend on the rates of proton transfers--effects of hydrostatic pressure and stopped flow experiments

Pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR), a negative phototaxis receptor of Natronomonas pharaonis, undergoes photocycle similar to the light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin (BR), but the turnover rate is much slower due to much longer lifetimes of the M and O intermediates. The M decay was shown to become as fast as it is in BR in the L40T/F86D mutant. We examined the effects of hydrostatic pressure on the decay of these intermediates. For BR, pressure decelerated M decay but slightly affected O decay. In contrast, with ppR and with its L40T/F86D mutant, pressure slightly affected M decay but accelerated O decay. Clearly, the pressure-dependent factors for M and O decay are different in BR and ppR. In order to examine the deprotonation of Asp75 in unphotolyzed ppR we performed stopped flow experiments. The pH jump-induced deprotonation of Asp75 occurred with 60 ms, which is at least 20 times slower than deprotonation of the equivalent Asp85 in BR and about 10-fold faster than the O decay of ppR. These data suggest that proton transfer is slowed not only in the cytoplasmic channel but also in the extracellular channel of ppR and that the light-induced structural changes in the O intermediate of ppR additionally decrease this rate.

Structural changes in the O-decay accelerated mutants of pharaonis phoborhodopsin

pharaonis phoborhodopsin ( ppR, also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psRII) is a receptor for negative phototaxis in Natronomonas pharaonis. The X-ray crystallographic structure of ppR is very similar to those of the ion-pumping rhodopsins, bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and halorhodopsin (hR). However, the decay processes of the photocycle intermediates such as M and O are much slower than those of BR and hR, which is advantageous for the sensor function of ppR. Iwamoto et al. previously found that, in a quadruple mutant (P182S/P183E/V194T/T204C; denoted as SETC) of ppR, the decay of the O intermediate was accelerated by approximately 100 times ( t 1/2 approximately 6.6 ms vs 690 ms for the wild type of ppR), being almost equal to that of BR (Iwamoto, M., et al. (2005) Biophys. J. 88, 1215-1223). The mutated residues are located on the extracellular surface (Pro182, Pro183, and Val194) and near the Schiff base (Thr204). The present Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of SETC revealed that protein structural changes in the K and M states were similar to those of the wild type. In contrast, the ppR O minus ppR infrared difference spectra of SETC are clearly different from those of the wild type in amide-I (1680-1640 cm (-1)) and S-H stretching (2580-2520 cm (-1)) vibrations. The 1673 (+) and 1656 (-) cm (-1) bands newly appear for SETC in the frequency region typical for the amide-I vibration of the alpha II- and alpha I-helices, respectively. The intensities of the 1673 (+) cm (-1) band of various mutants were well correlated with their O-decay half-times. Since the alpha II-helix possesses a considerably distorted structure, the result implies that distortion of the helix is required for fast O-decay. In addition, the characteristic changes in the S-H stretching vibration of Cys204 were different between SETC and T204C, suggesting that structural change near the Schiff base was induced by mutations of the extracellular surface. We conclude that the lifetime of the O intermediate in ppR is regulated by the distorted alpha-helix and strengthened hydrogen bond of Cys204.

Tryptophan 171 in Pharaonis phoborhodopsin (sensory rhodopsin II) interacts with the chromophore retinal and its substitution with alanine or threonine slowed down the decay of M- and O-intermediate

Pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR), also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, NpSRII, is a photoreceptor for the photophobic response of Natronomonas pharaonis. Tryptophan 182 (W182) of bacteriorhodopsin (bR) is near the chromophore retinal and has been suggested to interact with retinal during the photoreaction and also to be involved in the hydrogen-bonding network around the retinal. W182 of bR is conserved in ppR as tryptophan 171 (W171). To elucidate whether W171 of ppR interacts with retinal during the photoreaction and/or is involved in the hydrogen-bonding network as in bR, we formed W171-substituted mutants of ppR, W171A and W171T. Our low-temperature spectroscopic study has revealed that the substitution of W171 to Ala or Thr resulted in the stabilization of M- and O-intermediates. The stability of M and absorption spectral changes during the M-decay were different depending on the substituted residue. These findings suggest that W171 in ppR interacts with retinal and the degree of the interaction depends on the substituted residues, which might be rate determining in the M-decay. In addition, the involvement of W171 in the hydrogen-bonding network is suggested by the O-decay. We also found that glycerol slowed the decay of M and not of O.

Microbial rhodopsins: scaffolds for ion pumps, channels, and sensors

Microbial rhodopsins have been intensively researched for the last three decades. Since the discovery of bacteriorhodopsin, the scope of microbial rhodopsins has been considerably extended, not only in view of the large number of family members, but also their functional properties as pumps, sensors, and channels. In this review, we give a short overview of old and newly discovered microbial rhodopsins, the mechanism of signal transfer and ion transfer, and we discuss structural and mechanistic aspects of phototaxis.

Functional importance of the interhelical hydrogen bond between Thr204 and Tyr174 of sensory rhodopsin II and its alteration during the signaling process

Sensory rhodopsin II (SRII), a receptor for negative phototaxis in haloarchaea, transmits light signals through changes in protein-protein interaction with its transducer HtrII. Light-induced structural changes throughout the SRII-HtrII interface, which spans the periplasmic region, membrane-embedded domains, and cytoplasmic domains near the membrane, have been identified by several studies. Here we demonstrate by site-specific mutagenesis and analysis of phototaxis behavior that two residues in SRII near the membrane-embedded interface (Tyr174 on helix F and Thr204 on helix G) are essential for signaling by the SRII-HtrII complex. These residues, which are the first in SRII shown to be required for phototaxis function, provide biological significance to the previous observation that the hydrogen bond between them is strengthened upon the formation of the earliest SRII photointermediate (SRII(K)) only when SRII is complexed with HtrII. Here we report frequency changes of the S-H stretch of a cysteine substituted for SRII Thr204 in the signaling state intermediates of the SRII photocycle, as well as an influence of HtrII on the hydrogen bond strength, supporting a direct role of the hydrogen bond in SRII-HtrII signal relay chemistry. Our results suggest that the light signal is transmitted to HtrII from the energized interhelical hydrogen bond between Thr204 and Tyr174, which is located at both the retinal chromophore pocket and in helices F and G that form the membrane-embedded interaction surface to the signal-bearing second transmembrane helix of HtrII. The results argue for a critical process in signal relay occurring at this membrane interfacial region of the complex.

Correlation of the O-intermediate rate with the pKa of Asp-75 in the dark, the counterion of the Schiff base of Pharaonis phoborhodopsin (sensory rhodopsin II)

Pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR), also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, NpSRII, is a photoreceptor of negative phototaxis in Natronomonas (Natronobacterium) pharaonis. The photocycle rate of ppR is slow compared to that of bacteriorhodopsin, despite the similarity in their x-ray structures. The decreased rate of the photocycle of ppR is a result of the longer lifetime of later photo-intermediates such as M- (ppR(M)) and O-intermediates (ppR(O)). In this study, mutants were prepared in which mutated residues were located on the extracellular surface (P182, P183, and V194) and near the Schiff base (T204) including single, triple (P182S/P183E/V194T), and quadruple mutants. The decay of ppR(O) of the triple mutant was accelerated approximately 20-times from 690 ms for the wild-type to 36 ms. Additional mutation resulting in a triple mutant at the 204th position such as T204C or T204S further decreased the decay half-time to 6.6 or 8 ms, almost equal to that of bacteriorhodopsin. The decay half-times of the ppR(O) of mutants (11 species) and those of the wild-type were well-correlated with the pK(a) value of Asp-75 in the dark for the respective mutants as spectroscopically estimated, although there are some exceptions. The implications of these observations are discussed in detail.

Consequences of Counterion Mutation in Sensory Rhodopsin II ofNatronobacterium pharaonisfor Photoreaction and Receptor Activation: An FTIR Study

In many retinal proteins the proton transfer from the Schiff base to the counterion represents a functionally important step of the photoreaction. In the signaling state of sensory rhodopsin II from Natronobacterium pharaonis this transfer has already occurred, but in the counterion mutant Asp75Asn it is blocked during all steps of the photocycle. Therefore, the study of the molecular changes during the photoreaction of this mutant should provide a deeper understanding of the activation mechanism, and for this, we have applied time-resolved step-scan FTIR spectroscopy. The photoreaction is drastically altered; only red-shifted intermediates are formed with a chromophore strongly twisted around the 14-15 single bond. In addition, the photocycle is shortened by 2 orders of magnitude. Nevertheless, a transition involving only protein changes similar to that of the wild type is observed, which has been correlated with the formation of the signaling state. However, whereas in the wild type this transition occurs in the millisecond range, it is shortened to 200 micros in the mutant. The results are discussed with respect to the altered electrostatic interactions, role of proton transfer, the published 3D structure, and physiological activity.

Hydrogen Bonding Alteration of Thr-204 in the Complex between pharaonis Phoborhodopsin and Its Transducer Protein

Pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR, also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psRII) is a receptor for negative phototaxis in Natronobacterium pharaonis. It forms a 2:2 complex with its transducer protein, pHtrII, in membranes and transmits light signals through the change in the protein-protein interaction. We previously found that the ppR(K) minus ppR spectrum in D(2)O possesses vibrational bands of ppR at 3479 (-)/3369 (+) cm(-1) only in the presence of pHtrII [Furutani, Y., Sudo, Y., Kamo, N., and Kandori, H. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 4837-4842]. A D/H-unexchangeable X-H group appears to form a stronger hydrogen bond upon retinal photoisomerization in the ppR-pHtrII complex. This article aims to identify the group by use of various mutant proteins. According to the crystal structure, Tyr-199 of ppR forms a hydrogen bond with Asn-74 of pHtrII in the complex. Nevertheless, the 3479 (-)/3369 (+) cm(-1) bands were preserved in the Y199F mutant, excluding the possibility that the bands are O-H stretches of Tyr-199. On the other hand, Thr-204 and Tyr-174 form a hydrogen bond between the retinal chromophore pocket and the binding surface of the ppR-pHtrII complex. These FTIR measurements revealed that the bands at 3479 (-)/3369 (+) cm(-1) disappeared in the T204A mutant, while being shifted to 3498 (-) and 3474 (+) cm(-1) in the T204S mutant. They appear at 3430 (-)/3402 (+) cm(-1) in the Y174F mutant. From these results, we concluded that the bands at 3479 (-)/3369 (+) cm(-1) originate from the O-H stretch of Thr-204. A stronger hydrogen bond as shown by a large spectral downshift (110 cm(-1)) suggests that the specific hydrogen bonding alteration of Thr-204 takes place upon retinal photoisomerization, which does not occur in the absence of the transducer protein. Thr-204 has been known as an important residue for color tuning and photocycle kinetics in ppR. The results presented here point to an additional important role of Thr-204 in ppR for the interaction with pHtrII. Specific interaction in the complex that involves Thr-204 presumably affects the decay kinetics and binding affinity in the M intermediate.

Vibrational modes of the protonated Schiff base in pharaonis phoborhodopsin

pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR; also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psR-II) is a photoreceptor for negative phototaxis in Natronobacterium pharaonis. Recent X-ray crystallographic structures showed that ppR and bacteriorhodopsin (BR), a light-driven proton pump, possess similar molecular environments of the retinal Schiff base. Nevertheless, absorption spectra are different by 70 nm between ppR and BR, suggesting the different chromophore-protein interactions involving the Schiff base region. In this article, we identify frequencies of the Schiff base vibrations in the ppR(K) minus ppR difference spectra by means of low-temperature FTIR spectroscopy of [zeta-(15)N]lysine-labeled ppR. The N-D stretch in D(2)O was found at 2140 and 2091 cm(-1) for ppR, which are shifted to a lower frequency by 32-33 cm(-1) compared to those for BR. This observation indicates the stronger hydrogen bond of the Schiff base in ppR than in BR. The N-D stretch of the Schiff base and O-D stretch of water molecules are located at the different frequencies in ppR, while they appear in the same frequency region in BR [Kandori, H., Belenky, M., and Herzfeld, J. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 6026-6031]. These differences could be correlated with the distorted pentagonal cluster structure in ppR. In contrast, the N-D stretch of ppR(K) was found at 2474 cm(-1), which is close in frequency to that of BR(K). The O-D stretch of Thr79 was also assigned at 2512 and 2474 cm(-1) for ppR and ppR(K), respectively. These frequencies are close to those of BR, suggesting the interaction of Thr79 and Asp75 in ppR is similar to that of Thr89 and Asp85 in BR.

Importance of the broad regional interaction for spectral tuning in Natronobacterium pharaonis phoborhodopsin (sensory rhodopsin II)

Natronobacterium pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR; also called N. pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, NpsRII) is a photophobic sensor in N. pharaonis, and has a shorter absorption maximum (lambdamax, 500 nm) than those of other archaeal retinal proteins (lambdamax, 560-590 nm) such as bacteriorhodopsin (bR). We constructed chimeric proteins between bR and ppR to investigate the long range interactions effecting the color regulation among archaeal retinal proteins. The lambdamax of B-DEFG/P-ABC was 545 nm, similar to that of bR expressed in Escherichia coli (lambdamax, 550 nm). B-DEFG/P-ABC means a chimera composed of helices D, E, F, and G of bR and helices A, B, and C of ppR. This indicates that the major factor(s) determining the difference in lambdamax between bR and ppR exist in helices DEFG. To specify the more minute regions for the color determination between bR and ppR, we constructed 15 chimeric proteins containing helices D, E, F, and G of bR. According to the absorption spectra of the various chimeric proteins, the interaction between helices D and E as well as the effect of the hydroxyl group around protonated Schiff base on helix G (Thr-204 for ppR and Ala-215 for bR) are the main factors for spectral tuning between bR and ppR.

Proton transfer reactions in the F86D and F86E mutants of pharaonis phoborhodopsin (sensory rhodopsin II)

pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR, also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psRII), a negative phototaxis receptor of Natronobacterium pharaonis, can use light to pump a proton in the absence of its transducer protein. However, the pump activity is much lower than that of the light-driven proton-pump bacteriorhodopsin (BR). ppR's pump activity is known to be increased in a mutant protein, in which Phe86 is replaced with Asp (F86D). Phe86 is the amino acid residue corresponding to Asp96 in BR, and we expect that Asp86 plays an important role in the proton transfer at the highly hydrophobic cytoplasmic domain of the F86D mutant ppR. In this article, we studied protein structural changes and proton transfer reactions during the photocycles of the F86D and F86E mutants in ppR by means of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and photoelectrochemical measurements using a tin oxide (SnO2) electrode. FTIR spectra of the unphotolyzed state and the K and M intermediates are very similar among F86D, F86E, and the wild type. Asp86 or Glu86 is protonated in F86D or F86E, respectively, and the pK(a) > 9. During the photocycle, the pK(a) is lowered and deprotonation of Asp86 or Glu86 is observed. Detection of both deprotonation of Asp86 or Glu86 and concomitant reprotonation of the 13-cis chromophore implies the presence of a proton channel between position 86 and the Schiff base. However, the photoelectrochemical measurements revealed proton release presumably from Asp86 or Glu86 to the cytoplasmic aqueous phase in the M state. This indicates that the ppR mutants do not have the BR-like mechanism that conducts a proton uniquely from Asp86 or Glu86 (Asp96 in BR) to the Schiff base, which is possible in BR by stepwise protein structural changes at the cytoplasmic side. In ppR, there is a single open structure at the cytoplasmic side (the M-like structure), which is shown by the lack of the N-like protein structure even in F86D and F86E at alkaline pH. Therefore, it is likely that a proton can be conducted in either direction, the Schiff base or the bulk, in the open M-like structure of F86D and F86E.

Sensory rhodopsin II: functional insights from structure

Atomic resolution structures of a sensory rhodopsin phototaxis receptor in haloarchaea (the first sensory member of the widespread microbial rhodopsin family) have yielded insights into the interaction face with its membrane-embedded transducer and into the mechanism of spectral tuning. Spectral differences between sensory rhodopsin and the light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin depend largely upon the repositioning of a conserved arginine residue in the chromophore-binding pocket. Information derived from the structures, combined with biophysical and biochemical analysis, has established a model for receptor activation and signal relay, in which light-induced helix tilting in the receptor is transmitted to the transducer by lateral transmembrane helix-helix interactions.

A pharaonis phoborhodopsin mutant with the same retinal binding site residues as in bacteriorhodopsin

pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR, also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psR-II) is a photoreceptor for negative phototaxis in Natronobacterium pharaonis. ppR has a blue-shifted absorption maximum (500 nm) relative those of other archaeal rhodopsins such as the proton-pump bacteriorhodopsin (BR; 570 nm). Among the 25 amino acids that are within 5 A of the retinal chromophore, 10 are different in BR and ppR, and they are presumed to be crucial in determining the color of their chromophores. However, the spectral red shift in a multiple mutant of ppR, in which the retinal binding site was made similar to that of BR (BR/ppR), was smaller than 40% (lambda(max) = 524 nm) than expected. In the paper presented here, we report on low-temperature Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of BR/ppR, and compare the infrared spectral changes before and after photoisomerization with those for ppR and BR. The C[bond]C stretch and hydrogen out-of-plane (HOOP) vibrations of BR/ppR were similar to those of BR, suggesting that the surrounding protein moiety of BR/ppR becomes like BR. However, BR/ppR exhibited a unique IR band regarding the hydrogen bond of the protonated Schiff base. It has been known that ppR has a stronger hydrogen bond for the Schiff base than BR as judged from the frequency difference between their C[double bond]NH and C[double bond]ND stretches. We now find that replacement of the 10 amino acids of BR with ppR (BR/ppR) does not weaken the hydrogen bond of the Schiff base. Rather, the hydrogen bond in BR/ppR is stronger than that in the native ppR. We conclude that the principal factor of the smaller than expected opsin shift in BR/ppR is the strong association of the Schiff base with the surrounding counterion complex.