Involvement of the carboxy-terminus region of the dihydropyridine receptor beta1a subunit in excitation-contraction coupling of skeletal muscle

Advances in CaV1.1 gating: New insights into permeation and voltage-sensing mechanisms

The CaV1.1 voltage-gated Ca2+ channel carries L-type Ca2+ current and is the voltage-sensor for excitation-contraction (EC) coupling in skeletal muscle. Significant breakthroughs in the EC coupling field have often been close on the heels of technological advancement. In particular, CaV1.1 was the first voltage-gated Ca2+ channel to be cloned, the first ion channel to have its gating current measured and the first ion channel to have an effectively null animal model. Though these innovations have provided invaluable information regarding how CaV1.1 detects changes in membrane potential and transmits intra- and inter-molecular signals which cause opening of the channel pore and support Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum remain elusive. Here, we review current perspectives on this topic including the recent application of functional site-directed fluorometry.

Excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle: recent progress and unanswered questions

Excitation-contraction coupling (ECC) is a physiological process that links excitation of muscles by the nervous system to their mechanical contraction. In skeletal muscle, ECC is initiated with an action potential, generated by the somatic nervous system, which causes a depolarisation of the muscle fibre membrane (sarcolemma). This leads to a rapid change in the transmembrane potential, which is detected by the voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channel dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) embedded in the sarcolemma. DHPR transmits the contractile signal to another Ca²⁺ channel, ryanodine receptor (RyR1), embedded in the membrane of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), which releases a large amount of Ca²⁺ ions from the SR that initiate muscle contraction. Despite the fundamental role of ECC in skeletal muscle function of all vertebrate species, the molecular mechanism underpinning the communication between the two key proteins involved in the process (DHPR and RyR1) is still largely unknown. The goal of this work is to review the recent progress in our understanding of ECC in skeletal muscle from the point of view of the structure and interactions of proteins involved in the process, and to highlight the unanswered questions in the field.

STAC proteins: The missing link in skeletal muscle EC coupling and new regulators of calcium channel function

Excitation-contraction coupling is the signaling process by which action potentials control calcium release and consequently the force of muscle contraction. Until recently, three triad proteins were known to be essential for skeletal muscle EC coupling: the voltage-gated calcium channel CaV1.1 acting as voltage sensor, the SR calcium release channel RyR1 representing the only relevant calcium source, and the auxiliary CaV β1a subunit. Whether CaV1.1 and RyR1 are directly coupled or whether their interaction is mediated by another triad protein is still unknown. The recent identification of the adaptor protein STAC3 as fourth essential component of skeletal muscle EC coupling prompted vigorous research to reveal its role in this signaling process. Accumulating evidence supports its possible involvement in linking CaV1.1 and RyR1 in skeletal muscle EC coupling, but also indicates a second, much broader role of STAC proteins in the regulation of calcium/calmodulin-dependent feedback regulation of L-type calcium channels.

β-Subunit of the voltage-gated Ca2+ channel Cav1.2 drives signaling to the nucleus via H-Ras

Depolarization-induced signaling to the nucleus by the L-type voltage-gated calcium channel Cav1.2 is widely assumed to proceed by elevating intracellular calcium. The apparent lack of quantitative correlation between Ca²⁺ influx and gene activation suggests an alternative activation pathway. Here, we demonstrate that membrane depolarization of HEK293 cells transfected with α₁1.2/β2b/α2δ subunits (Cav1.2) triggers c-Fos and MeCP2 activation via the Ras/ERK/CREB pathway. Nuclear signaling is lost either by absence of the intracellular β2 subunit or by transfecting the cells with the channel mutant α₁1.2^W440A/β2b/α2δ, a mutation that disrupts the interaction between α₁1.2 and β2 subunits. Pulldown assays in neuronal SH-SY5Y cells and in vitro binding of recombinant H-Ras and β2 confirmed the importance of the intracellular β2 subunit for depolarization-induced gene activation. Using a Ca²⁺-impermeable mutant channel α₁1.2^L745P/β2b/α2δ or disrupting Ca²⁺/calmodulin binding to the channel using the channel mutant α₁1.2^I1624A/β2b/α2δ, we demonstrate that depolarization-induced c-Fos and MeCP2 activation does not depend on Ca²⁺ transport by the channel. Thus, in contrast to the paradigm that elevated intracellular Ca²⁺ drives nuclear signaling, we show that Cav1.2-triggered c-Fos or MeCP2 is dependent on extracellular Ca²⁺ and Ca²⁺ occupancy of the open channel pore, but is Ca²⁺-influx independent. An indispensable β-subunit interaction with H-Ras, which is triggered by conformational changes at α₁1.2 independently of Ca²⁺ flux, brings to light a master regulatory role of β2 in transcriptional activation via the ERK/CREB pathway. This mode of H-Ras activation could have broad implications for understanding the coupling of membrane depolarization to the rapid induction of gene transcription.

Voltage sensing mechanism in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling: coming of age or midlife crisis?

The process by which muscle fiber electrical depolarization is linked to activation of muscle contraction is known as excitation-contraction coupling (ECC). Our understanding of ECC has increased enormously since the early scientific descriptions of the phenomenon of electrical activation of muscle contraction by Galvani that date back to the end of the eighteenth century. Major advances in electrical and optical measurements, including muscle fiber voltage clamp to reveal membrane electrical properties, in conjunction with the development of electron microscopy to unveil structural details provided an elegant view of ECC in skeletal muscle during the last century. This surge of knowledge on structural and biophysical aspects of the skeletal muscle was followed by breakthroughs in biochemistry and molecular biology, which allowed for the isolation, purification, and DNA sequencing of the muscle fiber membrane calcium channel/transverse tubule (TT) membrane voltage sensor (Cav1.1) for ECC and of the muscle ryanodine receptor/sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release channel (RyR1), two essential players of ECC in skeletal muscle. In regard to the process of voltage sensing for controlling calcium release, numerous studies support the concept that the TT Cav1.1 channel is the voltage sensor for ECC, as well as also being a Ca2+ channel in the TT membrane. In this review, we present early and recent findings that support and define the role of Cav1.1 as a voltage sensor for ECC.

Stac proteins associate with the critical domain for excitation-contraction coupling in the II-III loop of CaV1.1

In skeletal muscle, residues 720-764/5 within the Ca_V1.1 II-III loop form a critical domain that plays an essential role in transmitting the excitation-contraction (EC) coupling Ca²⁺ release signal to the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) in the sarcoplasmic reticulum. However, the identities of proteins that interact with the loop and its critical domain and the mechanism by which the II-III loop regulates RyR1 gating remain unknown. Recent work has shown that EC coupling in skeletal muscle of fish and mice depends on the presence of Stac3, an adaptor protein that is highly expressed only in skeletal muscle. Here, by using colocalization as an indicator of molecular interactions, we show that Stac3, as well as Stac1 and Stac2 (predominantly neuronal Stac isoforms), interact with the II-III loop of Ca_V1.1. Further, we find that these Stac proteins promote the functional expression of Ca_V1.1 in tsA201 cells and support EC coupling in Stac3-null myotubes and that Stac3 is the most effective. Coexpression in tsA201 cells reveals that Stac3 interacts only with II-III loop constructs containing the majority of the Ca_V1.1 critical domain residues. By coexpressing Stac3 in dysgenic (Ca_V1.1-null) myotubes together with Ca_V1 constructs whose chimeric II-III loops had previously been tested for functionality, we reveal that the ability of Stac3 to interact with them parallels the ability of these constructs to mediate skeletal type EC coupling. Based on coexpression in tsA201 cells, the interaction of Stac3 with the II-III loop critical domain does not require the presence of the PKC C1 domain in Stac3, but it does require the first of the two SH3 domains. Collectively, our results indicate that activation of RyR1 Ca²⁺ release by Ca_V1.1 depends on Stac3 being bound to critical domain residues in the II-III loop.

De novo reconstitution reveals the proteins required for skeletal muscle voltage-induced Ca2+ release

Skeletal muscle contraction is triggered by Ca²⁺ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) in response to plasma membrane (PM) excitation. In vertebrates, this depends on activation of the RyR1 Ca²⁺ pore in the SR, under control of conformational changes of Ca_V1.1, located ∼12 nm away in the PM. Over the last ∼30 y, gene knockouts have revealed that Ca_V1.1/RyR1 coupling requires additional proteins, but leave open the possibility that currently untested proteins are also necessary. Here, we demonstrate the reconstitution of conformational coupling in tsA201 cells by expression of Ca_V1.1, β1a, Stac3, RyR1, and junctophilin2. As in muscle, depolarization evokes Ca²⁺ transients independent of external Ca²⁺ entry and having amplitude with a saturating dependence on voltage. Moreover, freeze-fracture electron microscopy indicates that the five identified proteins are sufficient to establish physical links between Ca_V1.1 and RyR1. Thus, these proteins constitute the key elements essential for excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle.

Core skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor calcium release complex

The core skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RyR1) calcium release complex extends through three compartments of the muscle fibre, linking the extracellular environment through the cytoplasmic junctional gap to the lumen of the internal sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) calcium store. The protein complex is essential for skeletal excitation-contraction (EC)-coupling and skeletal muscle function. Its importance is highlighted by perinatal death if any one of the EC-coupling components are missing and by myopathies associated with mutation of any of the proteins. The proteins essential for EC-coupling include the DHPR α_1S subunit in the transverse tubule membrane, the DHPR β_1a subunit in the cytosol and the RyR1 ion channel in the SR membrane. The other core proteins are triadin and junctin and calsequestrin, associated mainly with SR. These SR proteins are not essential for survival but exert structural and functional influences that modify the gain of EC-coupling and maintain normal muscle function. This review summarises our current knowledge of the individual protein/protein interactions within the core complex and their overall contribution to EC-coupling. We highlight significant areas that provide a continuing challenge for the field. Additional important components of the Ca²⁺ release complex, such as FKBP12, calmodulin, S100A1 and Stac3 are identified and reviewed elsewhere.

Distinct Components of Retrograde Ca(V)1.1-RyR1 Coupling Revealed by a Lethal Mutation in RyR1

The molecular basis for excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle is generally thought to involve conformational coupling between the L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel (CaV1.1) and the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1). This coupling is bidirectional; in addition to the orthograde signal from CaV1.1 to RyR1 that triggers Ca(2+) release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, retrograde signaling from RyR1 to CaV1.1 results in increased amplitude and slowed activation kinetics of macroscopic L-type Ca(2+) current. Orthograde coupling was previously shown to be ablated by a glycine for glutamate substitution at RyR1 position 4242. In this study, we investigated whether the RyR1-E4242G mutation affects retrograde coupling. L-type current in myotubes homozygous for RyR1-E4242G was substantially reduced in amplitude (∼80%) relative to that observed in myotubes from normal control (wild-type and/or heterozygous) myotubes. Analysis of intramembrane gating charge movements and ionic tail current amplitudes indicated that the reduction in current amplitude during step depolarizations was a consequence of both decreased CaV1.1 membrane expression (∼50%) and reduced channel Po (∼55%). In contrast, activation kinetics of the L-type current in RyR1-E4242G myotubes resembled those of normal myotubes, unlike dyspedic (RyR1 null) myotubes in which the L-type currents have markedly accelerated activation kinetics. Exogenous expression of wild-type RyR1 partially restored L-type current density. From these observations, we conclude that mutating residue E4242 affects RyR1 structures critical for retrograde communication with CaV1.1. Moreover, we propose that retrograde coupling has two distinct and separable components that are dependent on different structural elements of RyR1.

Bridging the myoplasmic gap II: more recent advances in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling

In skeletal muscle, excitation-contraction (EC) coupling relies on the transmission of an intermolecular signal from the voltage-sensing regions of the L-type Ca(2+) channel (Ca(V)1.1) in the plasma membrane to the channel pore of the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) nearly 10 nm away in the membrane of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). Even though the roles of Ca(V)1.1 and RyR1 as voltage sensor and SR Ca(2+) release channel, respectively, have been established for nearly 25 years, the mechanism underlying communication between these two channels remains undefined. In the course of this article, I will review current viewpoints on this topic with particular emphasis on recent studies.

Critical Role of Intracellular RyR1 Calcium Release Channels in Skeletal Muscle Function and Disease

The skeletal muscle Ca²⁺ release channel, also known as ryanodine receptor type 1 (RyR1), is the largest ion channel protein known and is crucial for effective skeletal muscle contractile activation. RyR1 function is controlled by Ca_v1.1, a voltage gated Ca²⁺ channel that works mainly as a voltage sensor for RyR1 activity during skeletal muscle contraction and is also fine-tuned by Ca²⁺, several intracellular compounds (e.g., ATP), and modulatory proteins (e.g., calmodulin). Dominant and recessive mutations in RyR1, as well as acquired channel alterations, are the underlying cause of various skeletal muscle diseases. The aim of this mini review is to summarize several current aspects of RyR1 function, structure, regulation, and to describe the most common diseases caused by hereditary or acquired RyR1 malfunction.

Regions of ryanodine receptors that influence activation by the dihydropyridine receptor β1a subunit

Background

Although excitation-contraction (EC) coupling in skeletal muscle relies on physical activation of the skeletal ryanodine receptor (RyR1) Ca²⁺ release channel by dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs), the activation pathway between the DHPR and RyR1 remains unknown. However, the pathway includes the DHPR β_1a subunit which is integral to EC coupling and activates RyR1. In this manuscript, we explore the isoform specificity of β_1a activation of RyRs and the β_1a binding site on RyR1.

Methods

We used lipid bilayers to measure single channel currents and whole cell patch clamp to measure L-type Ca²⁺ currents and Ca²⁺ transients in myotubes.

Results

We demonstrate that both skeletal RyR1 and cardiac RyR2 channels in phospholipid bilayers are activated by 10–100 nM of the β_1a subunit. Activation of RyR2 by 10 nM β_1a was less than that of RyR1, suggesting a reduced affinity of RyR2 for β_1a. A reduction in activation was also observed when 10 nM β_1a was added to the alternatively spliced (ASI(−)) isoform of RyR1, which lacks ASI residues (A3481-Q3485). It is notable that the equivalent region of RyR2 also lacks four of five ASI residues, suggesting that the absence of these residues may contribute to the reduced 10 nM β_1a activation observed for both RyR2 and ASI(−)RyR1 compared to ASI(+)RyR1. We also investigated the influence of a polybasic motif (PBM) of RyR1 (K3495KKRRDGR3502) that is located immediately downstream from the ASI residues and has been implicated in EC coupling. We confirmed that neutralizing the basic residues in the PBM (RyR1 K-Q) results in an ~50 % reduction in Ca²⁺ transient amplitude following expression in RyR1-null (dyspedic) myotubes and that the PBM is also required for β_1a subunit activation of RyR1 channels in lipid bilayers. These results suggest that the removal of β_1a subunit interaction with the PBM in RyR1 could contribute directly to ~50 % of the Ca²⁺ release generated during skeletal EC coupling.

Conclusions

We conclude that the β_1a subunit likely binds to a region that is largely conserved in RyR1 and RyR2 and that this region is influenced by the presence of the ASI residues and the PBM in RyR1.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13395-015-0049-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Amino acid residues 489-503 of dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) β1a subunit are critical for structural communication between the skeletal muscle DHPR complex and type 1 ryanodine receptor

The β1a subunit is a cytoplasmic component of the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) complex that plays an essential role in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. Here we investigate the role of the C-terminal end of this auxiliary subunit in the functional and structural communication between the DHPR and the Ca(2+) release channel (RyR1). Progressive truncation of the β1a C terminus showed that deletion of amino acid residues Gln(489) to Trp(503) resulted in a loss of depolarization-induced Ca(2+) release, a severe reduction of L-type Ca(2+) currents, and a lack of tetrad formation as evaluated by freeze-fracture analysis. However, deletion of this domain did not affect expression/targeting or density (Qmax) of the DHPR-α1S subunit to the plasma membrane. Within this motif, triple alanine substitution of residues Leu(496), Leu(500), and Trp(503), which are thought to mediate direct β1a-RyR1 interactions, weakened EC coupling but did not replicate the truncated phenotype. Therefore, these data demonstrate that an amino acid segment encompassing sequence (489)QVQVLTSLRRNLSFW(503) of β1a contains critical determinant(s) for the physical link of DHPR and RyR1, further confirming a direct correspondence between DHPR positioning and DHPR/RyR functional interactions. In addition, our data strongly suggest that the motif Leu(496)-Leu(500)-Trp(503) within the β1a C-terminal tail plays a nonessential role in the bidirectional DHPR/RyR1 signaling that supports skeletal-type EC coupling.

β1a490-508, a 19-residue peptide from C-terminal tail of Cav1.1 β1a subunit, potentiates voltage-dependent calcium release in adult skeletal muscle fibers

The α1 and β1a subunits of the skeletal muscle calcium channel, Cav1.1, as well as the Ca(2+) release channel, ryanodine receptor (RyR1), are essential for excitation-contraction coupling. RyR1 channel activity is modulated by the β1a subunit and this effect can be mimicked by a peptide (β1a490-524) corresponding to the 35-residue C-terminal tail of the β1a subunit. Protein-protein interaction assays confirmed a high-affinity interaction between the C-terminal tail of the β1a and RyR1. Based on previous results using overlapping peptides tested on isolated RyR1, we hypothesized that a 19-amino-acid residue peptide (β1a490-508) is sufficient to reproduce activating effects of β1a490-524. Here we examined the effects of β1a490-508 on Ca(2+) release and Ca(2+) currents in adult skeletal muscle fibers subjected to voltage-clamp and on RyR1 channel activity after incorporating sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles into lipid bilayers. β1a490-508 (25 nM) increased the peak Ca(2+) release flux by 49% in muscle fibers. Considerably fewer activating effects were observed using 6.25, 100, and 400 nM of β1a490-508 in fibers. β1a490-508 also increased RyR1 channel activity in bilayers and Cav1.1 currents in fibers. A scrambled form of β1a490-508 peptide was used as negative control and produced negligible effects on Ca(2+) release flux and RyR1 activity. Our results show that the β1a490-508 peptide contains molecular components sufficient to modulate excitation-contraction coupling in adult muscle fibers.

Ca(V)1.1: The atypical prototypical voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channel

Ca(V)1.1 is the prototype for the other nine known Ca(V) channel isoforms, yet it has functional properties that make it truly atypical of this group. Specifically, Ca(V)1.1 is expressed solely in skeletal muscle where it serves multiple purposes; it is the voltage sensor for excitation-contraction coupling and it is an L-type Ca²⁺ channel which contributes to a form of activity-dependent Ca²⁺ entry that has been termed Excitation-coupled Ca²⁺ entry. The ability of Ca(V)1.1 to serve as voltage-sensor for excitation-contraction coupling appears to be unique among Ca(V) channels, whereas the physiological role of its more conventional function as a Ca²⁺ channel has been a matter of uncertainty for nearly 50 years. In this chapter, we discuss how Ca(V)1.1 supports excitation-contraction coupling, the possible relevance of Ca²⁺ entry through Ca(V)1.1 and how alterations of Ca(V)1.1 function can have pathophysiological consequences. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Calcium channels.

An α-helical C-terminal tail segment of the skeletal L-type Ca2+ channel β1a subunit activates ryanodine receptor type 1 via a hydrophobic surface

Excitation-contraction (EC) coupling in skeletal muscle depends on protein interactions between the transverse tubule dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) voltage sensor and intracellular ryanodine receptor (RyR1) calcium release channel. We present novel data showing that the C-terminal 35 residues of the β(1a) subunit adopt a nascent α-helix in which 3 hydrophobic residues align to form a hydrophobic surface that binds to RyR1 isolated from rabbit skeletal muscle. Mutation of the hydrophobic residues (L496, L500, W503) in peptide β(1a)V490-M524, corresponding to the C-terminal 35 residues of β(1a), reduced peptide binding to RyR1 to 15.2 ± 7.1% and prevented the 2.9 ± 0.2-fold activation of RyR1 by 10 nM wild-type peptide. An upstream hydrophobic heptad repeat implicated in β(1a) binding to RyR1 does not contribute to RyR1 activation. Wild-type β(1a)A474-A508 peptide (10 nM), containing heptad repeat and hydrophobic surface residues, increased RyR1 activity by 2.3 ± 0.2- and 2.2 ± 0.3-fold after mutation of the heptad repeat residues. We conclude that specific hydrophobic surface residues in the 35 residue β(1a) C-terminus bind to RyR1 and increase channel activity in lipid bilayers and thus may support skeletal EC coupling.

Bimolecular fluorescence complementation and targeted biotinylation provide insight into the topology of the skeletal muscle Ca ( 2+) channel β1a subunit

In skeletal muscle, L-type calcium channels (DHPRs), localized to plasma membrane sarcoplasmic reticulum junctions, are tightly packed into groups of four termed tetrads. Here, we have used bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) and targeted biotinylation to probe the structure and organization of β1a subunits associated with native CaV 1.1 in DHPRs of myotubes. The construct YN-β1a-YC, in which the non-fluorescent fragments of YFP ("YN" corresponding to YFP residues 1-158, and "YC" corresponding to YFP residues 159-238) were fused, respectively, to the N- and C-termini of β1a, was fully functional and displayed yellow fluorescence within DHPR tetrads after expression in β1-knockout (β1KO) myotubes; this yellow fluorescence demonstrated the occurrence of BiFC of YN and YC on the β1a N- and C-termini. In these experiments, we avoided overexpression because control experiments in non-muscle cells indicated that this could result in non-specific BiFC. BiFC of YN-β1a-YC in DHPR tetrads appeared to be intramolecular between N- and C-termini of individual β1a subunits rather than between adjacent DHPRs because BiFC (1) was observed for YN-β1a-YC co-expressed with CaV 1.2 (which does not form tetrads) and (2) was not observed after co-expression of YN-β1a-YN plus YC-β1a-YC in β1KO myotubes. Thus, β1a function is compatible with N- and C-termini being close enough together to allow BiFC. However, both termini appeared to have positional freedom and not to be closely opposed by other junctional proteins since both were accessible to gold-streptavidin conjugates. Based on these results, a model is proposed for the arrangement of β1a subunits in DHPR tetrads.

The β(1a) subunit of the skeletal DHPR binds to skeletal RyR1 and activates the channel via its 35-residue C-terminal tail

Although it has been suggested that the C-terminal tail of the β(1a) subunit of the skeletal dihyropyridine receptor (DHPR) may contribute to voltage-activated Ca(2+) release in skeletal muscle by interacting with the skeletal ryanodine receptor (RyR1), a direct functional interaction between the two proteins has not been demonstrated previously. Such an interaction is reported here. A peptide with the sequence of the C-terminal 35 residues of β(1a) bound to RyR1 in affinity chromatography. The full-length β(1a) subunit and the C-terminal peptide increased [(3)H]ryanodine binding and RyR1 channel activity with an AC(50) of 450-600 pM under optimal conditions. The effect of the peptide was dependent on cytoplasmic Ca(2+), ATP, and Mg(2+) concentrations. There was no effect of the peptide when channel activity was very low as a result of Mg(2+) inhibition or addition of 100 nM Ca(2+) (without ATP). Maximum increases were seen with 1-10 μM Ca(2+), in the absence of Mg(2+) inhibition. A control peptide with the C-terminal 35 residues in a scrambled sequence did not bind to RyR1 or alter [(3)H]ryanodine binding or channel activity. This high-affinity in vitro functional interaction between the C-terminal 35 residues of the DHPR β(1a) subunit and RyR1 may support an in vivo function of β(1a) during voltage-activated Ca(2+) release.

The ß subunit of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels

Calcium regulates a wide spectrum of physiological processes such as heartbeat, muscle contraction, neuronal communication, hormone release, cell division, and gene transcription. Major entryways for Ca(2+) in excitable cells are high-voltage activated (HVA) Ca(2+) channels. These are plasma membrane proteins composed of several subunits, including α(1), α(2)δ, β, and γ. Although the principal α(1) subunit (Ca(v)α(1)) contains the channel pore, gating machinery and most drug binding sites, the cytosolic auxiliary β subunit (Ca(v)β) plays an essential role in regulating the surface expression and gating properties of HVA Ca(2+) channels. Ca(v)β is also crucial for the modulation of HVA Ca(2+) channels by G proteins, kinases, and the Ras-related RGK GTPases. New proteins have emerged in recent years that modulate HVA Ca(2+) channels by binding to Ca(v)β. There are also indications that Ca(v)β may carry out Ca(2+) channel-independent functions, including directly regulating gene transcription. All four subtypes of Ca(v)β, encoded by different genes, have a modular organization, consisting of three variable regions, a conserved guanylate kinase (GK) domain, and a conserved Src-homology 3 (SH3) domain, placing them into the membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) protein family. Crystal structures of Ca(v)βs reveal how they interact with Ca(v)α(1), open new research avenues, and prompt new inquiries. In this article, we review the structure and various biological functions of Ca(v)β, with both a historical perspective as well as an emphasis on recent advances.

Ryanodine receptors: structure, expression, molecular details, and function in calcium release

Ryanodine receptors (RyRs) are located in the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum membrane and are responsible for the release of Ca(2+) from intracellular stores during excitation-contraction coupling in both cardiac and skeletal muscle. RyRs are the largest known ion channels (> 2MDa) and exist as three mammalian isoforms (RyR 1-3), all of which are homotetrameric proteins that interact with and are regulated by phosphorylation, redox modifications, and a variety of small proteins and ions. Most RyR channel modulators interact with the large cytoplasmic domain whereas the carboxy-terminal portion of the protein forms the ion-conducting pore. Mutations in RyR2 are associated with human disorders such as catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia whereas mutations in RyR1 underlie diseases such as central core disease and malignant hyperthermia. This chapter examines the current concepts of the structure, function and regulation of RyRs and assesses the current state of understanding of their roles in associated disorders.

Skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling is independent of a conserved heptad repeat motif in the C-terminus of the DHPRbeta(1a) subunit

In skeletal muscle excitation-contraction (EC) coupling the sarcolemmal L-type Ca(2+) channel or 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) transduces the membrane depolarization signal to the sarcoplasmic Ca(2+) release channel RyR1 via protein-protein interaction. While it is evident that the pore-forming and voltage-sensing DHPRalpha(1S) subunit is essential for this process, the intracellular DHPRbeta(1a) subunit was also shown to be indispensable. We previously found that the beta(1a) subunit is essential to target the DHPR into groups of four (tetrads) opposite the RyR1 homotetramers, a prerequisite for skeletal muscle EC coupling. Earlier, a unique hydrophobic heptad repeat motif (Lcdots, three dots, centeredVcdots, three dots, centeredV) in the C-terminus of beta(1a) was postulated by others to be essential for skeletal muscle EC coupling, as substitution of these residues with alanines resulted in 80% reduction of RyR1 Ca(2+) release. Therefore, we wanted to address the question if the proposed beta(1a) heptad repeat motif could be an active element of the DHPR-RyR1 signal transduction mechanism or already contributes at the ultrastructural level i.e. DHPR tetrad arrangement. Surprisingly, our experiments revealed full tetrad formation and an almost complete restoration of EC coupling in beta(1)-null zebrafish relaxed larvae and isolated myotubes upon expression of a beta(1a)-specific heptad repeat mutant (LVV to AAA) and thus contradict the earlier results.

Effects of inserting fluorescent proteins into the alpha1S II-III loop: insights into excitation-contraction coupling

In skeletal muscle, intermolecular communication between the 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) and RYR1 is bidirectional: orthograde coupling (skeletal excitation-contraction coupling) is observed as depolarization-induced Ca(2+) release via RYR1, and retrograde coupling is manifested by increased L-type Ca(2+) current via DHPR. A critical domain (residues 720-765) of the DHPR alpha(1S) II-III loop plays an important but poorly understood role in bidirectional coupling with RYR1. In this study, we examine the consequences of fluorescent protein insertion into different positions within the alpha(1S) II-III loop. In four constructs, a cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) tandem was introduced in place of residues 672-685 (the peptide A region). All four constructs supported efficient bidirectional coupling as determined by the measurement of L-type current and myoplasmic Ca(2+) transients. In contrast, insertion of a CFP-YFP tandem within the N-terminal portion of the critical domain (between residues 726 and 727) abolished bidirectional signaling. Bidirectional coupling was partially preserved when only a single YFP was inserted between residues 726 and 727. However, insertion of YFP near the C-terminal boundary of the critical domain (between residues 760 and 761) or in the conserved C-terminal portion of the alpha(1S) II-III loop (between residues 785 and 786) eliminated bidirectional coupling. None of the fluorescent protein insertions, even those that interfered with signaling, significantly altered membrane expression or targeting. Thus, bidirectional signaling is ablated by insertions at two different sites in the C-terminal portion of the alpha(1S) II-III loop. Significantly, our results indicate that the conserved portion of the alpha(1S) II-III loop C terminal to the critical domain plays an important role in bidirectional coupling either by conveying conformational changes to the critical domain from other regions of the DHPR or by serving as a site of interaction with other junctional proteins such as RYR1.

The voltage-gated calcium-channel beta subunit: more than just an accessory

Voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels (VGCCs) are involved in a number of excitatory processes in the cell that regulate muscle contraction, neurotransmitter release, gene regulation, and neuronal migration. They consist of a central pore-forming alpha(1) subunit together with a number of associated auxiliary subunits including a cytoplasmic beta subunit. With the aid of X-ray crystallography, it has been found that the beta subunits of VGCCs (beta(2a), beta(3), and beta(4)) interact strongly with the I-II loop of the pore-forming alpha(1) subunit. Here we discuss the potential interaction sites of beta(1a) with its alpha(1) subunit as well as the skeletal ryanodine receptor. We suggest that not only can beta(1a) interact with the alpha(1) subunit I-II loop, but more subtle interactions may be possible through the II-III loop via the beta(1a) SH3 domain. Such findings could have important implications with respect to EC coupling.

[Molecular architecture of the sarcoplasmic reticulum and its role in the ECC]

The sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) plays a fundamental role in excitation-contraction coupling, which propagates the electric signal conversion along the muscle fiber's plasmic membrane to a mechanical event manifested as a muscle contraction. It plays a crucial role in calcium homeostasis and intracellular calcium storage control (storage, liberation and uptake) necessary for fiber muscle contraction and then relaxation. These functions take place at the triad, made up of individualized SR subdomains where the protein-specific organization provides efficient and fast coupling. Ryanodine receptors (RyR) and dihydropyridine receptors (DHPR) mainly act in calcium exchanges in the SR. This particular structural and molecular architecture must be correlated to its functional specificity.

Proper restoration of excitation-contraction coupling in the dihydropyridine receptor beta1-null zebrafish relaxed is an exclusive function of the beta1a subunit

The paralyzed zebrafish strain relaxed carries a null mutation for the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) beta(1a) subunit. Lack of beta(1a) results in (i) reduced membrane expression of the pore forming DHPR alpha(1S) subunit, (ii) elimination of alpha(1S) charge movement, and (iii) impediment of arrangement of the DHPRs in groups of four (tetrads) opposing the ryanodine receptor (RyR1), a structural prerequisite for skeletal muscle-type excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. In this study we used relaxed larvae and isolated myotubes as expression systems to discriminate specific functions of beta(1a) from rather general functions of beta isoforms. Zebrafish and mammalian beta(1a) subunits quantitatively restored alpha(1S) triad targeting and charge movement as well as intracellular Ca(2+) release, allowed arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads, and most strikingly recovered a fully motile phenotype in relaxed larvae. Interestingly, the cardiac/neuronal beta(2a) as the phylogenetically closest, and the ancestral housefly beta(M) as the most distant isoform to beta(1a) also completely recovered alpha(1S) triad expression and charge movement. However, both revealed drastically impaired intracellular Ca(2+) transients and very limited tetrad formation compared with beta(1a). Consequently, larval motility was either only partially restored (beta(2a)-injected larvae) or not restored at all (beta(M)). Thus, our results indicate that triad expression and facilitation of 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) charge movement are common features of all tested beta subunits, whereas the efficient arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads and thus intact DHPR-RyR1 coupling is only promoted by the beta(1a) isoform. Consequently, we postulate a model that presents beta(1a) as an allosteric modifier of alpha(1S) conformation enabling skeletal muscle-type EC coupling.

The alpha(1S) III-IV loop influences 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor gating but is not directly involved in excitation-contraction coupling interactions with the type 1 ryanodine receptor

In skeletal muscle, coupling between the 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) and the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) underlies excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. The III-IV loop of the DHPR alpha(1S) subunit binds to a segment of RyR1 in vitro, and mutations in the III-IV loop alter the voltage dependence of EC coupling, raising the possibility that this loop is directly involved in signal transmission from the DHPR to RyR1. To clarify the role of the alpha(1S) III-IV loop in EC coupling, we examined the functional properties of a chimera (GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa]) in which the III-IV loop of the divergent alpha(1A) isoform replaced that of alpha(1S). Dysgenic myotubes expressing GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa] yielded myoplasmic Ca(2+) transients that activated at approximately 10 mV more hyperpolarized potentials and that were approximately 65% smaller than those of GFP-alpha(1S). A similar reduction was observed in voltage-dependent charge movements for GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa], indicating that the chimeric channels trafficked less well to the membrane but that those that were in the membrane functioned as efficiently in EC coupling as GFP-alpha(1S). Relative to GFP-alpha(1S), L-type currents mediated by GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa] were approximately 40% smaller and activated at approximately 5 mV more hyperpolarized potentials. The altered gating of GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa] was accentuated by exposure to +/-Bay K 8644, which caused a much larger hyperpolarizing shift in activation compared with its effect on GFP-alpha(1S). Taken together, our observations indicate that the alpha(1S) III-IV loop is not directly involved in EC coupling but does influence DHPR gating transitions important both for EC coupling and activation of L-type conductance.

Rem inhibits skeletal muscle EC coupling by reducing the number of functional L-type Ca2+ channels

In skeletal muscle, the L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel (1,4-dihydropyridine receptor) serves as the voltage sensor for excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. In this study, we examined the effects of Rem, a member of the RGK (Rem, Rem2, Rad, Gem/Kir) family of Ras-related monomeric GTP-binding proteins, on the function of the skeletal muscle L-type Ca(2+) channel. EC coupling was found to be weakened in myotubes expressing Rem tagged with enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (YFP-Rem), as assayed by electrically evoked contractions and myoplasmic Ca(2+) transients. This impaired EC coupling was not a consequence of altered function of the type 1 ryanodine receptor, or of reduced Ca(2+) stores, since the application of 4-chloro-m-cresol, a direct type 1 ryanodine receptor activator, elicited myoplasmic Ca(2+) release in YFP-Rem-expressing myotubes that was not distinguishable from that in control myotubes. However, YFP-Rem reduced the magnitude of L-type Ca(2+) current by approximately 75% and produced a concomitant reduction in membrane-bound charge movements. Thus, our results indicate that Rem negatively regulates skeletal muscle EC coupling by reducing the number of functional L-type Ca(2+) channels in the plasma membrane.

Accessibility of targeted DHPR sites to streptavidin and functional effects of binding on EC coupling

In skeletal muscle, the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in the plasma membrane (PM) serves as a Ca(2+) channel and as the voltage sensor for excitation-contraction (EC coupling), triggering Ca(2+) release via the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) membrane. In addition to being functionally linked, these two proteins are also structurally linked to one another, but the identity of these links remains unknown. As an approach to address this issue, we have expressed DHPR alpha(1S) or beta(1a) subunits, with a biotin acceptor domain fused to targeted sites, in myotubes null for the corresponding, endogenous DHPR subunit. After saponin permeabilization, the approximately 60-kD streptavidin molecule had access to the beta(1a) N and C termini and to the alpha(1S) N terminus and proximal II-III loop (residues 671-686). Steptavidin also had access to these sites after injection into living myotubes. However, sites of the alpha(1S) C terminus were either inaccessible or conditionally accessible in saponin- permeabilized myotubes, suggesting that these C-terminal regions may exist in conformations that are occluded by other proteins in PM/SR junction (e.g., RyR1). The binding of injected streptavidin to the beta(1a) N or C terminus, or to the alpha(1S) N terminus, had no effect on electrically evoked contractions. By contrast, binding of streptavidin to the proximal alpha(1S) II-III loop abolished such contractions, without affecting agonist-induced Ca(2+) release via RyR1. Moreover, the block of EC coupling did not appear to result from global distortion of the DHPR and supports the hypothesis that conformational changes of the alpha(1S) II-III loop are necessary for EC coupling in skeletal muscle.

Bridging the myoplasmic gap: recent developments in skeletal muscle excitation–contraction coupling

Conformational coupling between the L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel (or 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor; DHPR) and the ryanodine-sensitive Ca(2+) release channel of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (RyR1) is the mechanistic basis for excitation-contraction (EC) coupling in skeletal muscle. In this article, recent findings regarding the roles of the individual cytoplasmic domains (the amino- and carboxyl-termini, cytoplasmic loops I-II, II-III, and III-IV) of the DHPR alpha(1S) subunit in bi-directional communication with RyR1 will be discussed.

Bidirectional signaling between calcium channels of skeletal muscle requires multiple direct and indirect interactions

We have defined regions of the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RyR1) essential for bidirectional signaling with dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) and for the organization of DHPR into tetrad arrays by expressing RyR1-RyR3 chimerae in dyspedic myotubes. RyR1-RyR3 constructs bearing RyR1 residues 1-1681 restored wild-type DHPR tetrad arrays and, in part, skeletal-type excitation-contraction (EC) coupling (orthograde signaling) but failed to enhance DHPR Ca(2+) currents (retrograde signaling) to WT RyR1 levels. Within this region, the D2 domain (amino acids 1272-1455), although ineffective on its own, dramatically enhanced the formation of tetrads and EC coupling rescue by constructs that otherwise are only partially effective. These findings suggest that the orthograde signal and DHPR tetrad formation require the contributions of numerous RyR regions. Surprisingly, we found that RyR3, although incapable of supporting EC coupling or tetrad formation, restored a significant level of Ca(2+) current, revealing a functional interaction with the skeletal muscle DHPR. Thus, our data support the hypotheses that (i) the structural/functional link between RyR1 and the skeletal muscle DHPR requires multiple interacting regions, (ii) the D2 domain of RyR1 plays a key role in stabilizing this interaction, and (iii) a form of retrograde signaling from RyR3 to the DHPR occurs in the absence of direct protein-protein interactions.

The role of voltage-gated calcium channels in pancreatic beta-cell physiology and pathophysiology

Voltage-gated calcium (CaV) channels are ubiquitously expressed in various cell types throughout the body. In principle, the molecular identity, biophysical profile, and pharmacological property of CaV channels are independent of the cell type where they reside, whereas these channels execute unique functions in different cell types, such as muscle contraction, neurotransmitter release, and hormone secretion. At least six CaValpha1 subunits, including CaV1.2, CaV1.3, CaV2.1, CaV2.2, CaV2.3, and CaV3.1, have been identified in pancreatic beta-cells. These pore-forming subunits complex with certain auxiliary subunits to conduct L-, P/Q-, N-, R-, and T-type CaV currents, respectively. beta-Cell CaV channels take center stage in insulin secretion and play an important role in beta-cell physiology and pathophysiology. CaV3 channels become expressed in diabetes-prone mouse beta-cells. Point mutation in the human CaV1.2 gene results in excessive insulin secretion. Trinucleotide expansion in the human CaV1.3 and CaV2.1 gene is revealed in a subgroup of patients with type 2 diabetes. beta-Cell CaV channels are regulated by a wide range of mechanisms, either shared by other cell types or specific to beta-cells, to always guarantee a satisfactory concentration of Ca2+. Inappropriate regulation of beta-cell CaV channels causes beta-cell dysfunction and even death manifested in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. This review summarizes current knowledge of CaV channels in beta-cell physiology and pathophysiology.

The junctional SR protein JP-45 affects the functional expression of the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel Cav1.1

JP-45, an integral protein of the junctional face membrane of the skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), colocalizes with its Ca2+ -release channel (the ryanodine receptor), and interacts with calsequestrin and the skeletal-muscle dihydropyridine receptor Cav1. We have identified the domains of JP-45 and the Cav1.1 involved in this interaction, and investigated the functional effect of JP-45. The cytoplasmic domain of JP-45, comprising residues 1-80, interacts with Cav1.1. JP-45 interacts with two distinct and functionally relevant domains of Cav1.1, the I-II loop and the C-terminal region. Interaction between JP-45 and the I-II loop occurs through the alpha-interacting domain in the I-II loop. beta1a, a Cav1 subunit, also interacts with the cytosolic domain of JP-45, and its presence drastically reduces the interaction between JP-45 and the I-II loop. The functional effect of JP-45 on Cav1.1 activity was assessed by investigating charge movement in differentiated C2C12 myotubes after overexpression or depletion of JP-45. Overexpression of JP-45 decreased peak charge-movement and shifted VQ1/2 to a more negative potential (-10 mV). JP-45 depletion decreased both the content of Cav1.1 and peak charge-movements. Our data demonstrate that JP-45 is an important protein for functional expression of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels.

Effects of peptide C corresponding to the Glu724-Pro760 region of the II-III loop of the DHP (dihydropyridine) receptor alpha1 subunit on the domain- switch-mediated activation of RyR1 (ryanodine receptor 1) Ca2+ channels

The Leu720-Leu764 region of the II-III loop of the dihydropyridine receptor is believed to be important for both orthograde and retrograde communications with the RyR (ryanodine receptor), but its actual role has not yet been resolved. Our recent studies suggest that voltage-dependent activation of the RyR channel is mediated by a pair of interacting N-terminal and central domains, designated as the 'domain switch'. To investigate the effect of peptide C (a peptide corresponding to residues Glu724-Pro760) on domain- switch-mediated activation of the RyR, we measured Ca2+ release induced by DP (domain peptide) 1 or DP4 (which activates the RyR by mediation of the domain switch) and followed the Ca2+ release time course using a luminal Ca2+ probe (chlortetracycline) under Ca2+-clamped conditions. Peptide C produced a significant potentiation of the domain-switch-mediated Ca2+ release, provided that the Ca2+ concentration was sufficiently low (e.g. 0.1 microM) and the Ca2+ channel was only partially activated by the domain peptide. However, at micromolar Ca2+ concentrations, peptide C inhibits activation. Covalent cross-linking of fluorescently labelled peptide C to the RyR and screening of the fluorescently labelled tryptic fragments permitted us to localize the peptide-C-binding site to residues 450-1400, which may represent the primary region involved in physical coupling. Based on the above findings, we propose that the physiological role of residues Glu724-Pro760 is to facilitate depolarization-induced and domain-switch-mediated RyR activation at sub- or near-threshold concentrations of cytoplasmic Ca2+ and to suppress activation upon an increase of cytoplasmic Ca2+.

Sarcoplasmic reticulum: The dynamic calcium governor of muscle

The sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) provides feedback control required to balance the processes of calcium storage, release, and reuptake in skeletal muscle. This balance is achieved through the concerted action of three major classes of SR calcium-regulatory proteins: (1) luminal calcium-binding proteins (calsequestrin, histidine-rich calcium-binding protein, junctate, and sarcalumenin) for calcium storage; (2) SR calcium release channels (type 1 ryanodine receptor or RyR1 and IP3 receptors) for calcium release; and (3) sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+ -ATPase (SERCA) pumps for calcium reuptake. Proper calcium storage, release, and reuptake are essential for normal skeletal muscle function. We review SR structure and function during normal skeletal muscle activity, the proteins that orchestrate calcium storage, release, and reuptake, and how phenotypically distinct muscle diseases (e.g., malignant hyperthermia, central core disease, and Brody disease) can result from subtle alterations in the activity of several key components of the SR calcium-regulatory machinery.

Organization of calcium channel beta1a subunits in triad junctions in skeletal muscle

In skeletal muscle, dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) in the plasma membrane interact with the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) at junctions with the sarcoplasmic reticulum. This interaction organizes junctional DHPRs into groups of four termed tetrads. In addition to the principle alpha1S subunit, the beta1a subunit of the DHPR is also important for the interaction with RyR1. To probe this interaction, we measured fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) of beta1a subunits labeled with cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) and/or yellow fluorescent protein (YFP). Expressed in dysgenic (alpha1S-null) myotubes, YFP-beta1a-CFP and CFP-beta1a-YFP were diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm and highly mobile as indicated by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Thus, beta1a does not appear to bind to other cellular proteins in the absence of alpha1S. FRET efficiencies for these cytoplasmic beta1a subunits were approximately 6-7%, consistent with the idea that <10 nm separates the N and C termini. After coexpression with unlabeled alpha1S (in dysgenic or beta1-null myotubes), both constructs produced discrete fluorescent puncta, which correspond to assembled DHPRs in junctions and that did not recover after photobleaching. In beta1-null myotubes, FRET efficiencies of doubly labeled beta1a in puncta were similar to those of the same constructs diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm and appeared to arise intramolecularly, since no FRET was measured when mixtures of singly labeled beta1a (CFP or YFP at the N or C terminus) were expressed in beta1-null myotubes. Thus, DHPRs in tetrads may be arranged such that the N and C termini of adjacent beta1a subunits are located >10 nm from one another.

The alpha1S N-terminus is not essential for bi-directional coupling with RyR1

The dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) alpha(1S) II-III loop has been shown to be critical for excitation-contraction (EC) coupling in skeletal muscle, but the importance of other cytoplasmic regions, especially the N-terminus (residues 1-51), remains unclear. In this study, we found that deletion of alpha(1S) residues 2-37 (weakly conserved with N-termini of other L-type Ca(2+) channels) had little effect on the ability of alpha(1S) to serve as a Ca(2+) channel or voltage sensor for EC coupling. Strikingly, deletion of 10 additional residues, which are conserved in L-type channels, resulted in ablation of DHPR function. Specifically, confocal microscopy and measurement of charge movement showed that removal of residues 2-47 resulted in a failure of sarcolemmal insertion. Our results indicate that the weakly conserved, distal alpha(1S) N-terminus is not critical for EC coupling or function as a Ca(2+) channel. However, integrity of the proximal alpha(1S) N-terminus is necessary for sarcolemmal expression of the DHPR.

Ryanodine Receptor Type 1 (RyR1) Mutations C4958S and C4961S Reveal Excitation-coupled Calcium Entry (ECCE) Is Independent of Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Store Depletion

Bi-directional signaling between ryanodine receptor type 1 (RyR1) and dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in skeletal muscle serves as a prominent example of conformational coupling. Evidence for a physiological mechanism that upon depolarization of myotubes tightly couples three calcium channels, DHPR, RyR1, and a Ca(2+) entry channel with SOCC-like properties, has recently been presented. This form of conformational coupling, termed excitation-coupled calcium entry (ECCE) is triggered by the alpha(1s)-DHPR voltage sensor and is highly dependent on RyR1 conformation. In this report, we substitute RyR1 cysteines 4958 or 4961 within the TXCFICG motif, common to all ER/SR Ca(2+) channels, with serine. When expressed in skeletal myotubes, C4958S- and C4961S-RyR1 properly target and restore L-type current via the DHPR. However, these mutants do not respond to RyR activators and do not support skeletal type EC coupling. Nonetheless, depolarization of cells expressing C4958S- or C4961S-RyR1 triggers calcium entry via ECCE that resembles that for wild-type RyR1, except for substantially slowed inactivation and deactivation kinetics. ECCE in these cells is completely independent of store depletion, displays a cation selectivity of Ca(2+)>Sr(2+) approximately Ba(2+), and is fully inhibited by SKF-96365 or 2-APB. Mutation of other non-CXXC motif cysteines within the RyR1 transmembrane assembly (C3635S, C4876S, and C4882S) did not replicate the phenotype observed with C4958S- and C4961S-RyR1. This study demonstrates the essential role of Cys(4958) and Cys(4961) within an invariant CXXC motif for stabilizing conformations of RyR1 that influence both its function as a release channel and its interaction with ECCE channels.

Short-term regulation of excitation-contraction coupling by the beta1a subunit in adult mouse skeletal muscle

The beta1a subunit of the skeletal muscle voltage-gated Ca2+ channel plays a fundamental role in the targeting of the channel to the tubular system as well as in channel function. To determine whether this cytosolic auxiliary subunit is also a regulatory protein of Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in vivo, we pressure-injected the beta1a subunit into intact adult mouse muscle fibers and recorded, with Fluo-3 AM, the intracellular Ca2+ signal induced by the action potential. We found that the beta1a subunit significantly increased, within minutes, the amplitude of Ca2+ release without major changes in its time course. beta1a subunits with the carboxy-terminus region deleted did not show an effect on Ca2+ release. The possibility that potentiation of Ca2+ release is due to a direct interaction between the beta1a subunit and the ryanodine receptor was ruled out by bilayer experiments of RyR1 single-channel currents and also by Ca2+ flux experiments. Our data suggest that the beta1a subunit is capable of regulating E-C coupling in the short term and that the integrity of the carboxy-terminus region is essential for its modulatory effect.

Involvement of a heptad repeat in the carboxyl terminus of the dihydropyridine receptor beta1a subunit in the mechanism of excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle

Chimeras consisting of the homologous skeletal dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) beta1a subunit and the heterologous cardiac/brain beta2a subunit were used to determine which regions of beta1a were responsible for the skeletal-type excitation-contraction (EC) coupling phenotype. Chimeras were transiently transfected in beta1 knockout myotubes and then voltage-clamped with simultaneous measurement of confocal fluo-4 fluorescence. All chimeras expressed a similar density of DHPR charge movements, indicating that the membrane density of DHPR voltage sensors was not a confounding factor in these studies. The data indicates that a beta1a-specific domain present in the carboxyl terminus, namely the D5 region comprising the last 47 residues (beta1a 478-524), is essential for expression of skeletal-type EC coupling. Furthermore, the location of beta1aD5 immediately downstream from conserved domain D4 is also critical. In contrast, chimeras in which beta1aD5 was swapped by the D5 region of beta2a expressed Ca(2+) transients triggered by the Ca(2+) current, or none at all. A hydrophobic heptad repeat is present in domain D5 of beta1a (L478, V485, V492). To determine the role of this motif, residues in the heptad repeat were mutated to alanines. The triple mutant beta1a(L478A/V485A/V492A) recovered weak skeletal-type EC coupling (DeltaF/F(max) = 0.4 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.5 for wild-type beta1a). However, a triple mutant with alanine substitutions at positions out of phase with the heptad repeat, beta1a(S481A/L488A/S495A), was normal (DeltaF/F(max) = 2.1 +/- 0.4). In summary, the presence of the beta1a-specific D5 domain, in its correct position after conserved domain D4, is essential for skeletal-type EC coupling. Furthermore, a heptad repeat in beta1aD5 controls the EC coupling activity. The carboxyl terminal heptad repeat of beta1a might be involved in protein-protein interactions with ryanodine receptor type 1 required for DHPR to ryanodine receptor type 1 signal transmission.

Functional interaction of CaV channel isoforms with ryanodine receptors studied in dysgenic myotubes

The L-type Ca(2+) channels Ca(V)1.1 (alpha(1S)) and Ca(V)1.2 (alpha(1C)) share properties of targeting but differ by their mode of coupling to ryanodine receptors in muscle cells. The brain isoform Ca(V)2.1 (alpha(1A)) lacks ryanodine receptor targeting. We studied these three isoforms in myotubes of the alpha(1S)-deficient skeletal muscle cell line GLT under voltage-clamp conditions and estimated the flux of Ca(2+) (Ca(2+) input flux) resulting from Ca(2+) entry and release. Surprisingly, amplitude and kinetics of the input flux were similar for alpha(1C) and alpha(1A) despite a previously reported strong difference in responsiveness to extracellular stimulation. The kinetic flux characteristics of alpha(1C) and alpha(1A) resembled those in alpha(1S)-expressing cells but the contribution of Ca(2+) entry was much larger. alpha(1C) but not alpha(1A)-expressing cells revealed a distinct transient flux component sensitive to sarcoplasmic reticulum depletion by 30 microM cyclopiazonic acid and 10 mM caffeine. This component likely results from synchronized Ca(2+)-induced Ca(2+) release that is absent in alpha(1A)-expressing myotubes. In cells expressing an alpha(1A)-derivative (alpha(1)Aas(1592-clip)) containing the putative targeting sequence of alpha(1S), a similar transient component was noticeable. Yet, it was considerably smaller than in alpha(1C), indicating that the local Ca(2+) entry produced by the chimera is less effective in triggering Ca(2+) release despite similar global Ca(2+) inward current density.

Differential contribution of skeletal and cardiac II-III loop sequences to the assembly of dihydropyridine-receptor arrays in skeletal muscle

The plasmalemmal dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) is the voltage sensor in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction (e-c) coupling. It activates calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum via protein-protein interactions with the ryanodine receptor (RyR). To enable this interaction, DHPRs are arranged in arrays of tetrads opposite RyRs. In the DHPR alpha(1S) subunit, the cytoplasmic loop connecting repeats II and III is a major determinant of skeletal-type e-c coupling. Whether the essential II-III loop sequence (L720-L764) also determines the skeletal-specific arrangement of DHPRs was examined in dysgenic (alpha(1S)-null) myotubes reconstituted with distinct alpha(1) subunit isoforms and II-III loop chimeras. Parallel immunofluorescence and freeze-fracture analysis showed that alpha(1S) and chimeras containing L720-L764, all of which restored skeletal-type e-c coupling, displayed the skeletal arrangement of DHPRs in arrays of tetrads. Conversely, alpha(1C) and those chimeras with a cardiac II-III loop and cardiac e-c coupling properties were targeted into junctional membranes but failed to form tetrads. However, an alpha(1S)-based chimera with the heterologous Musca II-III loop produced tetrads but did not reconstitute skeletal muscle e-c coupling. These findings suggest an inhibitory role in tetrad formation of the cardiac II-III loop and that the organization of DHPRs in tetrads vis-a-vis the RyR is necessary but not sufficient for skeletal-type e-c coupling.

Targeting mechanisms of high voltage-activated Ca2+ channels

Functional voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel complexes are assembled by three to four subunits: alpha1, beta, alpha2delta subunits (C. Leveque et al., 1994, J. Biol Chem. 269, 6306-6312; M. W. McEnery et al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 11095-11099) and at least in muscle cells also y subunits (B. M. Curtis and W. A. Catterall, 1984, Biochemistry 23, 2113-2118). Ca2+ channels mediate the voltage-dependent Ca2+ influx in subcellular compartments, triggering such diverse processes as neurotransmitter release, dendritic action potentials, excitation-contraction, and excitation-transcription coupling. The targeting of biophysically defined Ca2+ channel complexes to the correct subcellular structures is, thus, critical to proper cell and physiological functioning. Despite their importance, surprisingly little is known about the targeting mechanisms by which Ca2+ channel complexes are transported to their site of function. Here we summarize what we know about the targeting of Ca2+ channel complexes through the cell to the plasma membrane and subcellular structures.

Evidence for conformational coupling between two calcium channels

Ryanodine receptor 1 (RyR1, the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) release channel) and alpha(1S)dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR, the surface membrane voltage sensor) of skeletal muscle belong to separate membrane systems but are functionally and structurally linked. Four alpha(1S)DHPRs associated with the four identical subunits of a RyR form a tetrad. We treated skeletal muscle cell lines with ryanodine, at concentrations that block RyRs, and determined whether this treatment affects the distance between DHPRs in the tetrad. We find a substantial ( approximately 2-nm) shift in the alpha(1S)DHPR positions, indicating that ryanodine induces large conformational changes in the RyR1 cytoplasmic domain and that the alpha(1S)DHPR-RyR complex acts as a unit.

Mapping sites of potential proximity between the dihydropyridine receptor and RyR1 in muscle using a cyan fluorescent protein-yellow fluorescent protein tandem as a fluorescence resonance energy transfer probe

Excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle involves conformational coupling between the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) and the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) at junctions between the plasma membrane and sarcoplasmic reticulum. In an attempt to find which regions of these proteins are in close proximity to one another, we have constructed a tandem of cyan and yellow fluorescent proteins (CFP and YFP, respectively) linked by a 23-residue spacer, and measured the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) of the tandem either in free solution or after attachment to sites of the alpha1S and beta1a subunits of the DHPR. For all of the sites examined, attachment of the CFP-YFP tandem did not impair function of the DHPR as a Ca2+ channel or voltage sensor for excitation-contraction coupling. The free tandem displayed a 27.5% FRET efficiency, which decreased significantly after attachment to the DHPR subunits. At several sites examined for both alpha1S (N-terminal, proximal II-III loop of a two fragment construct) and beta1a (C-terminal), the FRET efficiency was similar after expression in either dysgenic (alpha1S-null) or dyspedic (RyR1-null) myotubes. However, compared with dysgenic myotubes, the FRET efficiency in dyspedic myotubes increased from 9.9 to 16.7% for CFP-YFP attached to the N-terminal of beta1a, and from 9.5 to 16.8% for CFP-YFP at the C-terminal of alpha1S. Thus, the tandem reporter suggests that the C terminus of alpha1S and the N terminus of beta1a may be in close proximity to the ryanodine receptor.

Metabolic biotinylation as a probe of supramolecular structure of the triad junction in skeletal muscle

Excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle involves conformational coupling between dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) in the plasma membrane and ryanodine receptors (RyRs) in the sarcoplasmic reticulum. However, it remains uncertain what regions, if any, of the two proteins interact with one another. Toward this end, it would be valuable to know the spatial interrelationships of DHPRs and RyRs within plasma membrane/sarcoplasmic reticulum junctions. Here we describe a new approach based on metabolic incorporation of biotin into targeted sites of the DHPR. To accomplish this, cDNAs were constructed with a biotin acceptor domain (BAD) fused to selected sites of the DHPR, with fluorescent protein (XFP) attached at a second site. All of the BAD-tagged constructs properly targeted to junctions (as indicted by small puncta of XFP) and were functional for excitation-contraction coupling. To determine whether the introduced BAD was biotinylated and accessible to avidin (approximately 60 kDa), myotubes were fixed, permeablized, and exposed to fluorescently labeled avidin. Upon expression in beta1-null or dysgenic (alpha1S-null) myotubes, punctate avidin fluorescence co-localized with the XFP puncta for BAD attached to the beta1a N- or C-terminals, or the alpha1S N-terminal or II-III loop. However, BAD fused to the alpha1S C-terminal was inaccessible to avidin in dysgenic myotubes (containing RyR1). In contrast, this site was accessible to avidin when the identical construct was expressed in dyspedic myotubes lacking RyR1. These results indicate that avidin has access to a number of sites of the DHPR within fully assembled (RyR1-containing) junctions, but not to the alpha1S C-terminal, which appears to be occluded by the presence of RyR1.

Ca2+-dependent excitation-contraction coupling triggered by the heterologous cardiac/brain DHPR beta2a-subunit in skeletal myotubes

Molecular determinants essential for skeletal-type excitation-contraction (EC) coupling have been described in the cytosolic loops of the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) alpha1S pore subunit and in the carboxyl terminus of the skeletal-specific DHPR beta1a-subunit. It is unknown whether EC coupling domains present in the beta-subunit influence those present in the pore subunit or if they act independent of each other. To address this question, we investigated the EC coupling signal that is generated when the endogenous DHPR pore subunit alpha1S is paired with the heterologous heart/brain DHPR beta2a-subunit. Studies were conducted in primary cultured myotubes from beta1 knockout (KO), ryanodine receptor type 1 (RyR1) KO, ryanodine receptor type 3 (RyR3) KO, and double RyR1/RyR3 KO mice under voltage clamp with simultaneous monitoring of confocal fluo-4 fluorescence. The beta2a-mediated Ca2+ current recovered in beta1 KO myotubes lacking the endogenous DHPR beta1a-subunit verified formation of the alpha1S/beta1a pair. In myotube genotypes which express no or low-density L-type Ca2+ currents, namely beta1 KO and RyR1 KO, beta2a overexpression recovered a wild-type density of nifedipine-sensitive Ca2+ currents with a slow activation kinetics typical of skeletal myotubes. Concurrent with Ca2+ current recovery, there was a drastic reduction of voltage-dependent, skeletal-type EC coupling and emergence of Ca2+ transients triggered by the Ca2+ current. A comparison of beta2a overexpression in RyR3 KO, RyR1 KO, and double RyR1/RyR3 KO myotubes concluded that both RyR1 and RyR3 isoforms participated in Ca2+-dependent Ca2+ release triggered by the beta2a-subunit. In beta1 KO and RyR1 KO myotubes, the Ca2+-dependent EC coupling promoted by beta2a overexpression had the following characteristics: 1), L-type Ca2+ currents had a wild-type density; 2), Ca2+ transients activated much slower than controls overexpressing beta1a, and the rate of fluorescence increase was consistent with the activation kinetics of the Ca2+ current; 3), the voltage dependence of the Ca2+ transient was bell-shaped and the maximum was centered at approximately +30 mV, consistent with the voltage dependence of the Ca2+ current; and 4), Ca2+ currents and Ca2+ transients were fully blocked by nifedipine. The loss in voltage-dependent EC coupling promoted by beta2a was inferred by the drastic reduction in maximal Ca2+ fluorescence at large positive potentials (DeltaF/Fmax) in double dysgenic/beta1 KO myotubes overexpressing the pore mutant alpha1S (E1014K) and beta2a. The data indicate that beta2a, upon interaction with the skeletal pore subunit alpha1S, overrides critical EC coupling determinants present in alpha1S. We propose that the alpha1S/beta pair, and not the alpha1S-subunit alone, controls the EC coupling signal in skeletal muscle.