Epibatidine, a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist, inhibits the capsaicin response in dorsal root ganglion neurons

Antinociceptive effect of tebanicline for various noxious stimuli-induced behaviours in mice

Tebanicline (ABT-594), an analogue of epibatidine, exhibits potent antinociceptive effects and high affinity for the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in the central nervous system. We assessed whether tebanicline exerts an effect on various noxious stimuli and mediates the nicotine receptor or opioid receptor through stimulation. The antinociceptive effects of tebanicline were determined by noxious chemical, thermal and mechanical stimuli-induced behaviours in mice. Tebanicline had dose-dependent analgesic effects in formalin, hot-plate and tail-pressure tests. By contrast, the antinociceptive effect of tebanicline was not demonstrated in the tail-flick assay. Pre-treatment with mecamylamine, a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist, blocked the effects of tebanicline in formalin, tail-pressure and hot-plate tests. Moreover, pre-treatment with naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, only partially inhibited the effects of tebanicline in formalin and tail-pressure tests. Tebanicline produced antinociception in persistent chemical (formalin), acute thermal (hot-plate, but not tail-flick) and mechanical (tail-pressure) pain states. Moreover, tebanicline stimulated the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and opioid receptor.

Differential action potentials and firing patterns in injured and uninjured small dorsal root ganglion neurons after nerve injury

The profile of tetrodotoxin sensitive (TTX-S) and resistant (TTX-R) Na(+) channels and their contribution to action potentials and firing patterns were studied in isolated small dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons after L5/L6 spinal nerve ligation (SNL). Total TTX-R Na(+) currents and Na(v) 1.8 mRNA were reduced in injured L5 DRG neurons 14 days after SNL. In contrast, TTX-R Na(+)currents and Na(v) 1.8 mRNA were upregulated in uninjured L4 DRG neurons after SNL. Voltage-dependent inactivation of TTX-R Na(+) channels in these neurons was shifted to hyperpolarized potentials by 4 mV. Two types of neurons were identified in injured L5 DRG neurons after SNL. Type I neurons (57%) had significantly lower threshold but exhibited normal resting membrane potential (RMP) and action potential amplitude. Type II neurons (43%) had significantly smaller action potential amplitude but retained similar RMP and threshold to those from sham rats. None of the injured neurons could generate repetitive firing. In the presence of TTX, only 26% of injured neurons could generate action potentials that had smaller amplitude, higher threshold, and higher rheobase compared with sham rats. In contrast, action potentials and firing patterns in uninjured L4 DRG neurons after SNL, in the presence or absence of TTX, were not affected. These results suggest that TTX-R Na(+) channels play important roles in regulating action potentials and firing patterns in small DRG neurons and that downregulation in injured neurons and upregulation in uninjured neurons confer differential roles in shaping electrogenesis, and perhaps pain transmission, in these neurons.

Descending control of pain

Upon receipt in the dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord, nociceptive (pain-signalling) information from the viscera, skin and other organs is subject to extensive processing by a diversity of mechanisms, certain of which enhance, and certain of which inhibit, its transfer to higher centres. In this regard, a network of descending pathways projecting from cerebral structures to the DH plays a complex and crucial role. Specific centrifugal pathways either suppress (descending inhibition) or potentiate (descending facilitation) passage of nociceptive messages to the brain. Engagement of descending inhibition by the opioid analgesic, morphine, fulfils an important role in its pain-relieving properties, while induction of analgesia by the adrenergic agonist, clonidine, reflects actions at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (alpha(2)-ARs) in the DH normally recruited by descending pathways. However, opioids and adrenergic agents exploit but a tiny fraction of the vast panoply of mechanisms now known to be involved in the induction and/or expression of descending controls. For example, no drug interfering with descending facilitation is currently available for clinical use. The present review focuses on: (1) the organisation of descending pathways and their pathophysiological significance; (2) the role of individual transmitters and specific receptor types in the modulation and expression of mechanisms of descending inhibition and facilitation and (3) the advantages and limitations of established and innovative analgesic strategies which act by manipulation of descending controls. Knowledge of descending pathways has increased exponentially in recent years, so this is an opportune moment to survey their operation and therapeutic relevance to the improved management of pain.