1
|
Carstens E, Carstens MI. Sensory Effects of Nicotine and Tobacco. Nicotine Tob Res 2022; 24:306-315. [PMID: 33955474 PMCID: PMC8842437 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ingestion of nicotine by smoking, vaping, or other means elicits various effects including reward, antinociception, and aversion due to irritation, bitter taste, and unpleasant side effects such as nausea and dizziness. AIMS AND METHODS Here we review the sensory effects of nicotine and the underlying neurobiological processes. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Nicotine elicits oral irritation and pain via the activation of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) expressed by trigeminal nociceptors. These nociceptors excite neurons in the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (Vc) and other brainstem regions in a manner that is significantly reduced by the nAChR antagonist mecamylamine. Vc neurons are excited by lingual application of nicotine and exhibit a progressive decline in firing to subsequent applications, consistent with desensitization of peripheral sensory neurons and progressively declining ratings of oral irritation in human psychophysical experiments. Nicotine also elicits a nAChR-mediated bitter taste via excitation of gustatory afferents. Nicotine solutions are avoided even when sweeteners are added. Studies employing oral self-administration have yielded mixed results: Some studies show avoidance of nicotine while others report increased nicotine intake over time, particularly in adolescents and females. Nicotine is consistently reported to increase human pain threshold and tolerance levels. In animal studies, nicotine is antinociceptive when delivered by inhalation of tobacco smoke or systemic infusion, intrathecally, and by intracranial microinjection in the pedunculopontine tegmentum, ventrolateral periaqueductal gray, and rostral ventromedial medulla. The antinociception is thought to be mediated by descending inhibition of spinal nociceptive transmission. Menthol cross-desensitizes nicotine-evoked oral irritation, reducing harshness that may account for its popularity as a flavor additive to tobacco products. IMPLICATIONS Nicotine activates brain systems underlying reward and antinociception, but at the same time elicits aversive sensory effects including oral irritation and pain, bitter taste, and other unpleasant side effects mediated largely by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). This review discusses the competing aversive and antinociceptive effects of nicotine and exposure to tobacco smoke, and the underlying neurobiology. An improved understanding of the interacting effects of nicotine will hopefully inform novel approaches to mitigate nicotine and tobacco use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Earl Carstens
- Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - M Iodi Carstens
- Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Startek JB, Voets T, Talavera K. To flourish or perish: evolutionary TRiPs into the sensory biology of plant-herbivore interactions. Pflugers Arch 2018; 471:213-236. [PMID: 30229297 DOI: 10.1007/s00424-018-2205-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Revised: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The interactions between plants and their herbivores are highly complex systems generating on one side an extraordinary diversity of plant protection mechanisms and on the other side sophisticated consumer feeding strategies. Herbivores have evolved complex, integrative sensory systems that allow them to distinguish between food sources having mere bad flavors from the actually toxic ones. These systems are based on the senses of taste, olfaction and somatosensation in the oral and nasal cavities, and on post-ingestive chemosensory mechanisms. The potential ability of plant defensive chemical traits to induce tissue damage in foragers is mainly encoded in the latter through chemesthetic sensations such as burning, pain, itch, irritation, tingling, and numbness, all of which induce innate aversive behavioral responses. Here, we discuss the involvement of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels in the chemosensory mechanisms that are at the core of complex and fascinating plant-herbivore ecological networks. We review how "sensory" TRPs are activated by a myriad of plant-derived compounds, leading to cation influx, membrane depolarization, and excitation of sensory nerve fibers of the oronasal cavities in mammals and bitter-sensing cells in insects. We also illustrate how TRP channel expression patterns and functionalities vary between species, leading to intriguing evolutionary adaptations to the specific habitats and life cycles of individual organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justyna B Startek
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Campus Gasthuisberg O&N1 bus 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. .,VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Thomas Voets
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Campus Gasthuisberg O&N1 bus 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karel Talavera
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Campus Gasthuisberg O&N1 bus 802, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nicotine activates the chemosensory cation channel TRPA1. Nat Neurosci 2009; 12:1293-9. [PMID: 19749751 DOI: 10.1038/nn.2379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 184] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2009] [Accepted: 07/06/2009] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Topical application of nicotine, as used in nicotine replacement therapies, causes irritation of the mucosa and skin. This reaction has been attributed to activation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in chemosensory neurons. In contrast with this view, we found that the chemosensory cation channel transient receptor potential A1 (TRPA1) is crucially involved in nicotine-induced irritation. We found that micromolar concentrations of nicotine activated heterologously expressed mouse and human TRPA1. Nicotine acted in a membrane-delimited manner, stabilizing the open state(s) and destabilizing the closed state(s) of the channel. In the presence of the general nAChR blocker hexamethonium, nociceptive neurons showed nicotine-induced responses that were strongly reduced in TRPA1-deficient mice. Finally, TRPA1 mediated the mouse airway constriction reflex to nasal instillation of nicotine. The identification of TRPA1 as a nicotine target suggests that existing models of nicotine-induced irritation should be revised and may facilitate the development of smoking cessation therapies with less adverse effects.
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Gustatory perception is inherently multimodal, since approximately the same time that intra-oral stimuli activate taste receptors, somatosensory information is concurrently sent to the CNS. We review evidence that gustatory perception is intrinsically linked to concurrent somatosensory processing. We will show that processing of multisensory information can occur at the level of the taste cells through to the gustatory cortex. We will also focus on the fact that the same chemical and physical stimuli that activate the taste system also activate the somatosensory system (SS), but they may provide different types of information to guide behavior.
Collapse
|
5
|
Carstens E, Albin KC, Simons CT, Carstens MI. Time course of self-desensitization of oral irritation by nicotine and capsaicin. Chem Senses 2007; 32:811-6. [PMID: 17641107 DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjm048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Nicotine contacting mucous membranes elicits irritation that decreases with repeated exposures (self-desensitization). We investigated the time course of nicotine self-desensitization and compared it with that of capsaicin. Nicotine (300 mM, 10 microl) was applied to one-half of the dorsal tongue and vehicle to the other. Following a rest period ranging from 0.5 to 48 h, nicotine (5 microl) was reapplied to each side of the tongue and subjects indicated on which side they experienced stronger irritation and separately rated the intensity of the sensation on each side. After intervals of 0.5, 1, and 24 h, a significant majority of subjects chose the vehicle-treated side as having stronger irritation and assigned significantly higher intensity ratings to that side, indicating self-desensitization. The effect was not present after 48 h. By comparison, 10 parts per million (ppm) (33 microM) capsaicin induced significant self-desensitization at 1 but not 24 h, whereas a higher concentration of capsaicin (100 ppm, 330 microM) induced significant self-desensitization at intervals of 1, 24, and 48 h. These results indicate that initial exposure to nicotine or capsaicin can markedly attenuate irritant sensations elicited by subsequent exposure to these irritants hours to days later.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Carstens
- Section of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Soares ES, Stapleton JR, Rodriguez A, Fitzsimmons N, Oliveira L, Nicolelis MAL, Simon SA. Behavioral and neural responses to gustatory stimuli delivered non-contingently through intra-oral cannulas. Physiol Behav 2007; 92:629-42. [PMID: 17588623 PMCID: PMC2148501 DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2006] [Revised: 05/04/2007] [Accepted: 05/10/2007] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The act of eating requires a decision by an animal to place food in its mouth. The reasons to eat are varied and include hunger as well as the food's expected reward value. Previous studies of tastant processing in the rat primary gustatory cortex (GC) have used either anesthetized or awake behaving preparations that yield somewhat different results. Here we have developed a new preparation in which we explore the influences of intra-oral and non-contingent tastant delivery on rats' behavior and on their GC neural responses. We recorded single-unit activity in the rat GC during two sequences of tastant deliveries, PRE and POST, which were separated by a waiting period. Six tastants ranging in hedonic value from sucrose to quinine were delivered in the first two protocols called 4TW and L-S. In the third one, the App L-S protocol, only hedonically positive tastants were used. In the 4TW protocol, tastants were delivered in blocks whereas in the two L-S protocols tastants were randomly interleaved. In the 4TW and L-S protocols the probability of ingesting tastants in the PRE sequence decreased exponentially with the trial number. Moreover, in both protocols this decrease was greater in the POST than in the PRE sequence likely because the subjects learned that unpleasant tastants were to be delivered. In the App L-S protocol the decrease in ingestion was markedly slower than in the other protocols, thus supporting the hypothesis that the decrease in appetitive behavior arises from the non-contingent intra-oral delivery of hedonically negative tastants like quinine. Although neuronal responses in the three protocols displayed similar variability levels, significant differences existed between the protocols in the way the variability was partitioned between chemosensory and non-chemosensory neurons. While in the 4TW and L-S protocols the former population displayed more changes than the latter, in the App L-S protocol variability was homogeneously distributed between the two populations. We posit that these tuning changes arise, at least in part, from compounds released upon ingestion, and also from differences in areas of the oral cavity that are bathed as the animals ingest or reject the tastants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernesto S. Soares
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham NC, USA
- Evolutionary Systems and Biomedical Engineering Lab, Institute for Systems and Robotics, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Abel Rodriguez
- Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences, Duke University, Durham NC, USA
| | | | - Laura Oliveira
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham NC, USA
| | - Miguel A. L. Nicolelis
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham NC, USA
- Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham NC, USA
- Center for Neuroengineering, Duke University, Durham NC, USA
- Dept. of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham NC, USA
| | - Sidney A. Simon
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham NC, USA
- Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham NC, USA
- Center for Neuroengineering, Duke University, Durham NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Simons CT, Boucher Y, Carstens MI, Carstens E. Nicotine suppression of gustatory responses of neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract. J Neurophysiol 2006; 96:1877-86. [PMID: 16837661 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00345.2006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
This study investigated effects of nicotine applied to the tongue surface on responses of gustatory neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) in rats. In pentobarbital-anesthetized rats, single-unit recordings were made from NTS units responsive to one or more tastants (sucrose, NaCl, citric acid, monosodium glutamate, quinine). Application of nicotine (0.87, 8.7, or 600 mM) excited gustatory NTS units and significantly attenuated NTS unit responses to their preferred tastant in a dose-dependent manner. The depressant effect of nicotine was equivalent regardless of which tastant best excited the NTS unit. Nicotinic excitation of NTS units and depression of their tastant-evoked responses were both significantly attenuated by the nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine, which itself did not excite NTS units. In rats with bilateral trigeminal ganglionectomy, nicotine still excited nearly all NTS units but no longer depressed tastant-evoked responses. Nicotine did not elicit plasma extravasation when applied to the tongue. The results indicate that nicotine directly excites NTS units by gustatory nerves and inhibits their tastant-evoked responses by a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated excitation of trigeminal afferents that inhibit NTS units centrally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher T Simons
- Section of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|