Differential induction of rat hepatic microsomal epoxide hydrolase and rGSTA2 by diazines: the role of cytochrome P450 2E1-mediated metabolic activation

Microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1 (EPHX1): Gene, structure, function, and role in human disease

Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1) is an evolutionarily highly conserved biotransformation enzyme for converting epoxides to diols. Notably, the enzyme is able to either detoxify or bioactivate a wide range of substrates. Mutations and polymorphic variants in the EPHX1 gene have been associated with susceptibility to several human diseases including cancer. This review summarizes the key knowledge concerning EPHX1 gene and protein structure, expression pattern and regulation, and substrate specificity. The relevance of EPHX1 for human pathology is especially discussed.

The role of epoxide hydrolases in health and disease

Epoxide hydrolases (EH) are ubiquitously expressed in all living organisms and in almost all organs and tissues. They are mainly subdivided into microsomal and soluble EH and catalyze the hydration of epoxides, three-membered-cyclic ethers, to their corresponding dihydrodiols. Owning to the high chemical reactivity of xenobiotic epoxides, microsomal EH is considered protective enzyme against mutagenic and carcinogenic initiation. Nevertheless, several endogenously produced epoxides of fatty acids function as important regulatory mediators. By mediating the formation of cytotoxic dihydrodiol fatty acids on the expense of cytoprotective epoxides of fatty acids, soluble EH is considered to have cytotoxic activity. Indeed, the attenuation of microsomal EH, achieved by chemical inhibitors or preexists due to specific genetic polymorphisms, is linked to the aggravation of the toxicity of xenobiotics, as well as the risk of cancer and inflammatory diseases, whereas soluble EH inhibition has been emerged as a promising intervention against several diseases, most importantly cardiovascular, lung and metabolic diseases. However, there is reportedly a significant overlap in substrate selectivity between microsomal and soluble EH. In addition, microsomal and soluble EH were found to have the same catalytic triad and identical molecular mechanism. Consequently, the physiological functions of microsomal and soluble EH are also overlapped. Thus, studying the biological effects of microsomal or soluble EH alterations needs to include the effects on both the metabolism of reactive metabolites, as well as epoxides of fatty acids. This review focuses on the multifaceted role of EH in the metabolism of xenobiotic and endogenous epoxides and the impact of EH modulations.

Safety assessment of 2-ethyl-3,(5 or 6) dimethylpyrazine as a food ingredient

2-Ethyl-3,(5 or 6)-dimethylpyrazine (CAS No. 27043-05-6), a heterocyclic, nitrogen-containing compound, is used in the food industry as a flavor ingredient for its characteristic roasted odor and flavor, reminiscent of roasted cocoa or nuts. Pyrazines, including 2-ethyl-3,(5 or 6)-dimethylpyrazine, are widely distributed in foods and because of their natural unavoidable occurrence in cooked food; therefore, pyrazine compounds, including 2-ethyl-3,(5 or 6)-dimethylpyrazine, are commonly consumed in the daily diet. 2-Ethyl-3,(5 or 6)-dimethylpyrazine is oxidized in rats almost exclusively via its aliphatic side-chain to carboxylic acid derivatives. The LD(50) of 2-ethyl-3,(5 or 6)-dimethylpyrazine in rats was reported as 460 mg/kg and it is reported to be irritating to the skin, eyes and the upper respiratory tract. Two 90-day rat feeding studies have been conducted on 2-ethyl-3,(5 or 6)-dimethylpyrazine, with the one reporting a no effect level of 12.5mg/kg/day (both sexes) and a second study reporting a NOAEL of 2-ethyl-3,(5 or 6)-dimethylpyrazine 17 and 18 mg/kg/day for male and female rats, respectively. Although no genotoxicity studies were found on 2-ethyl-3,(5 or 6)-dimethylpyrazine, structurally similar pyrazine derivatives were reported as clastogenic in mammalian cells and non-mutagenic in bacterial assays. The relevance of the positive results in assays with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro is unclear. The data and information available, including a prolonged history of safe use, indicate that at the current level of intake, the food flavoring use of 2-ethyl-3,(5 or 6)-dimethylpyrazine is safe.

Alternative promoters determine tissue-specific expression profiles of the human microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene (EPHX1)

Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1) catalyzes hydration reactions that determine the cellular disposition of reactive epoxide derivatives. Whereas the previously defined EPHX1 exon 1 sequence (E1) is derived from a promoter proximal to exon 2 of the EPHX1 coding region, in this investigation, we identified an alternative EPHX1 exon 1 sequence, E1-b, originating from a gene promoter localized approximately 18.5 kb upstream of exon 2. Northern hybridizations demonstrated that the E1-b variant is widely expressed and that the E1-b promoter functions as the primary driver of EPHX1 expression in human tissues. In contrast, the E1 promoter directs expression only in the liver. To examine the basis for liver-specific usage of the E1 promoter, we identified several potential cis-regulatory elements that included GATA (-110/-105) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 (HNF3) (-96/-88) motifs. GATA-4 was the principal GATA family member interacting with its respective motif, whereas both HNF3alpha and HNF3beta were capable of interacting with the HNF3 element. GATA-4 and HNF3alpha/HNF3beta DNA binding complexes were enriched in hepatic cells. Site-directed mutagenesis and transactivation analyses of the E1 promoter revealed that GATA-4 is probably a principal factor that regulates liver-specific expression of the E1 variant, with HNF3alpha and HNF3beta acting to negatively regulate GATA-4 function in hepatic cells.

Chemopreventive allylthiopyridazine derivatives induce apoptosis in SK-Hep-1 hepatocarcinoma cells through a caspase-3-dependent mechanism

Dietary organosulphur compounds including diallylsulphide, a component of garlic oil, were shown to inhibit the proliferation of tumour cells. Since hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most lethal malignancies and there is no effective preventive measure to date, we wished to pursue the chemopreventive potential of the synthetic allylthiopyridazine derivatives (K compounds) on hepatocarcinoma cells. Here, we report that the K compounds efficiently inhibited SK-Hep-1 cell proliferation through induction of apoptosis. Increased chain length at the 3-position of allylthiopyridazine ring improved the potency of growth inhibition. K compounds downregulated Bcl-2, while Bax remained unchanged, reducing the ratio of Bcl-2 to Bax. We also provide evidence that the K compound-induced apoptosis involves cytochrome c release and caspase-3 activation. These results suggest that the allythiopyridazine derivatives, especially 3-propoxy-6-allylthiopyridazine, induce apoptosis in SK-Hep-1 cells through a caspase-3-dependent mechanism, which may contribute to the chemopreventive function for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase by oxidative stress leads to the induction of microsomal epoxide hydrolase in H4IIE cells

We have shown that PI3-kinase played an essential role in the ARE-mediated rGSTA2 induction by oxidative stress following SAAD (Mol. Pharmacol. 58 (2000) 1017). Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH), which detoxifies a variety of epoxide intermediates produced from various xenobiotics, is inducible by oxidative stress. In the present study, we studied whether sulfur amino acid deprivation (SAAD) activated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-kinase)/Akt and induced mEH in H4IIE cells. The role of PI3-kinase activation on the mEH induction by SAAD was also investigated. PI3-kinase was activated from 10 min through 12 h after SAAD, the activity of which returned to control level at 24 h. The activation of PI3-kinase led to increases in the activity of Akt at the same time points. Northern and Western blot analyses revealed that the mEH mRNA level was four-fold increased at 48 h, which accompanied the induction of mEH protein. Wortmannin or LY294002, PI3-kinase inhibitors, completely inhibited the increases in mEH mRNA and protein by SAAD. These results demonstrated that SAAD activated the PI3-kinase/Akt pathway at early stages and induced mEH, presumably as an adaptive response, and that the PI3-kinase/Akt pathway played a crucial role in the induction of mEH.

Prevention of c-Jun/activator protein-1 activation and microsomal epoxide hydrolase induction in the rat liver by cysteine during protein-calorie malnutrition

Protein-calorie malnutrition (PCM), a major global health problem, arises during protein and/or energy deficit due to disease and nutritional inadequacy. To date, cellular adaptive responses and gene expression associated with PCM remain poorly understood. In view of the primary role of the liver in energy conversion, the present study was designed to investigate changes in hepatic morphology and molecular alterations during PCM. PCM caused marked decreases in the cytoplasmic eosinophilic content and nuclear shrinkage in the hepatocytes with a decrease in glutathione content. The nuclear activator protein-1 (AP-1) complex was activated in the liver of PCM rats. AP-1-binding activity of nuclear extracts produced from PCM rats was reduced by the presence of anti-c-Jun antibody. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH), a phase II detoxifying enzyme, was 4-fold induced, with a 20-fold increase in the mRNA level during PCM. In contrast to the PCM-induced changes in hepatic morphology, PCM rats supplemented with cysteine showed an increase in the GSH level and well-preserved hepatic structures with mild fat degeneration. Cysteine supplementation inhibited the activation of AP-1 and the induction of mEH in PCM rats. These results provided evidence: (i) that PCM alters liver morphology with a decrease in the glutathione level; (ii) that cysteine may serve as a key element responsible for preserving hepatic morphology and maintaining the glutathione level; and (iii) that cysteine was active in preventing the activation of AP-1 and mEH induction in the liver during PCM.

Epoxide hydrolases: biochemistry and molecular biology

Epoxides are organic three-membered oxygen compounds that arise from oxidative metabolism of endogenous, as well as xenobiotic compounds via chemical and enzymatic oxidation processes, including the cytochrome P450 monooxygenase system. The resultant epoxides are typically unstable in aqueous environments and chemically reactive. In the case of xenobiotics and certain endogenous substances, epoxide intermediates have been implicated as ultimate mutagenic and carcinogenic initiators Adams et al. (Chem. Biol. Interact. 95 (1995) 57-77) Guengrich (Properties and Metabolic roles 4 (1982) 5-30) Sayer et al. (J. Biol. Chem. 260 (1985) 1630-1640). Therefore, it is of vital importance for the biological organism to regulate levels of these reactive species. The epoxide hydrolases (E.C. 3.3.2. 3) belong to a sub-category of a broad group of hydrolytic enzymes that include esterases, proteases, dehalogenases, and lipases Beetham et al. (DNA Cell Biol. 14 (1995) 61-71). In particular, the epoxide hydrolases are a class of proteins that catalyze the hydration of chemically reactive epoxides to their corresponding dihydrodiol products. Simple epoxides are hydrated to their corresponding vicinal dihydrodiols, and arene oxides to trans-dihydrodiols. In general, this hydration leads to more stable and less reactive intermediates, however exceptions do exist. In mammalian species, there are at least five epoxide hydrolase forms, microsomal cholesterol 5,6-oxide hydrolase, hepoxilin A(3) hydrolase, leukotriene A(4) hydrolase, soluble, and microsomal epoxide hydrolase. Each of these enzymes is distinct chemically and immunologically. Table 1 illustrates some general properties for each of these classes of hydrolases. Fig. 1 provides an overview of selected model substrates for each class of epoxide hydrolase.

Induction of class alpha glutathione S-transferases by 4-methylthiazole in the rat liver: role of oxidative stress

The expression of glutathione S-transferase (GST) is a crucial factor in determining the sensitivity of cells and organs in response to a variety of toxicants. Expression of class alpha GST genes by methyl-substituted thiazoles was assessed in the rat liver. Northern blot analysis revealed that 4-methylthiazole (4-MT) elevated rGSTA2, A3, A5 and M1 mRNAs in the liver by 19-, 4-, 6- and 9-fold at 24 h after treatment, respectively, as compared to control. Consecutive 3-day treatment with 4-MT resulted in 4- to 7-fold increases in rGSTA and M1 mRNAs. Multiple treatments with 5-methylthiazole (5-MT) caused marginal increases in GST mRNAs in spite of the large increases in certain GST mRNAs at 24 h. Either 4, 5-dimethylthiazole (DT) or 2,4,5-trimethylthiazole (TT) minimally affected the rGSTA and rGSTM mRNA expression at 1-3 day(s). Western blot analysis showed that 4-MT induced rGSTA1/2, rGSTA3/5 and rGSTM1 proteins by 2.6-, 2.1- and 2.1-fold at 3 days, respectively, while other methylthiazoles failed to induce the GST subunits. Starving rats were treated with a lower dose of methylthiazoles to study the role of oxidative stress in the mRNA expression. The levels in rGSTA2/3/5 mRNAs were significantly enhanced by 4-MT in starving rats, whereas rGSTM1/2 mRNAs were not further increased. Other methylthiazoles were inactive in enhancing the mRNAs in starving animals. Pretreatment of starving rats with either cysteine or methionine completely prevented the increases in class alpha GST mRNAs by 4-MT. Data showed that 4-MT induces class alpha GSTs with the increases in the mRNAs, whereas 5-methyl-, dimethyl- and trimethyl-substituted thiazoles were minimally active. Increases in the class alpha GST mRNAs by 4-MT may be associated with the oxidative stress in hepatocytes, as supported by starvation and sulfur amino acid experiments.

Enhanced expression of rat hepatic microsomal epoxide hydrolase by methylthiazole in conjunction with liver injury

Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) is inducible by a number of xenobiotics. Induction of mEH by certain chemopreventive agents may implicate the protective effect. In contrast, many of carcinogenic agents also induce the enzyme. The hepatotoxicity and mEH expression by methylthiazoles, which are incorporated as functional groups in a number of therapeutic agents, were assessed in the rat liver to study the structural basis for the enzyme induction and the correlative enzyme expression with hepatotoxicity. Among the methylthiazoles examined, 4-methylthiazole (MT) at the daily dose of 1.17 mmol/kg body weight caused hepatic necrosis and degeneration after 1-3 consecutive daily treatment(s), whereas 4, 5-dimethylthiazole (DT) and 2,4,5-trimethylthiazole (TT) elicited no toxicity. Treatment of rats with MT at the daily dose of 1.17 mmol/kg increased the mEH mRNA by 17- and 7-fold at day 1 and day 3, respectively, relative to control. Whereas DT caused 5- and 2-fold increases in mEH mRNA at day 1 and day 3, respectively, TT minimally affected mEH expression. The mRNA increase was consistent with the protein induction. Hence, the methylthiazole causing hepatotoxicity was more active in inducing the enzyme. Whereas treatment with MT at the dose of 0.35 mmol/kg caused no hepatotoxicity, MT caused hepatic necrosis in starving rats. Northern blot analysis showed that the mEH mRNA level was increased to a greater extent by MT in starving rats than in control animals. Conversely, treatment of starving rats with either cysteine or methionine prior to MT prevented the hepatic necrosis. Elevation of the mEH mRNA by MT in starving animals was also inhibited by either cysteine or methionine pretreatment. These results demonstrated that the methylthiazole which caused hepatotoxicity also up-regulated mEH expression, whereas other methylthiazoles showing no toxicity minimally increased the gene expression. The observation that the extent of mEH expression by MT was highly associated with that of liver injury raised the notion that mEH expression by xenobiotics may not necessarily represent the beneficial and protective effects.