[Morbidity and mortality in gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in a specialised unit]

Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Following D2 Gastrectomy-an Audit of 456 Cases

BACKGROUND

D2 gastrectomy is routinely performed in Japanese centres for carcinoma stomach with low morbidity and mortality. There were concerns in Western centres with regard to D2 gastrectomy in view of high morbidity and mortality rates. This study was aimed to study the postoperative morbidity and mortality following D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma stomach in a high volume centre in India.

METHODS

It was a retrospective analysis of all the patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy from 1991 to 2010.

RESULTS

D2 gastrectomy was performed in 456 patients during this period. Respiratory events were the most common cause of morbidity in the study group (2.4 %). Male gender (p = 0.007), presence of gastric outlet obstruction (p = 0.01) and pathological T4 (p = 0.05) independently predicted increased post operative morbidity in multivariate analysis. The morbidity and mortality rates declined with increase in hospital volume and experience of the surgeon.

CONCLUSION

D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma stomach can be performed safely in specialized centres with low morbidity and mortality rates.

A comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and radical surgery for early gastric cancer: a retrospective study

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become one of the mainstays of treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). Radical surgery is also a classical treatment method for EGC. There have been no systematic clinical studies of the curative effects and adverse events associated with ESD vs. radical surgery for EGC. This study investigated the therapeutic efficacy and safety of ESD and radical surgery for EGC.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients with EGC underwent ESD, and 59 underwent radical surgery at Weihai Municipal Hospital. The pathological characteristics, postoperative outcomes, hospital course, morbidity and mortality were retrospectively compared between the two groups.

Results

The oncological clearance was 93.1 % (27/29) in the ESD group. Postoperative delayed haemorrhage occurred in two patients. The hospital stay ranged from 10 to 23 days, and the average stay was 14.3 ± 3.7 days. The patients were followed-up for 1 to 5 years, with a mean follow-up of 26.9 ± 8.5 months. Regular endoscopic examinations showed that the wound had healed with no cancer recurrence in all of the patients. In the radical surgery group, the oncological clearance was 100 % (59/59). The hospital stay ranged from 11 to 55 days, and the average stay was 21.7 ± 9.3 days. The patients were followed-up for 1 to 3.7 years, with a mean follow-up of 22.3 ± 9.4 months. Nine patients developed complications, including acute postoperative adhesive ileus (1/59) and symptomatic residual gastritis (3/59). These complications were improved by an additional operation, drainage, gastrointestinal decompression and comprehensive therapy.

Conclusions

ESD achieved similar efficacy and had many advantages compared with radical surgery for the treatment of EGC.

Learning curve for d2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer

Background. D2 lymphadenectomy is a demanding technique which is associated with high morbidity in the West. We report our experience with D2 lymphadenectomy after a training period in Japan. Methods. Prospective, descriptive study in 133 consecutive patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma from 2005 to 2011. We analysed the number of lymph nodes removed, observed morbidity/mortality compared with the predictions of POSSUM and O-POSSUM, survival, and disease-free interval for patients with D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy. Results. The morbidity rate in patients with D1 lymphadenectomy was 59.4%. For D2 it was 47.7%. The mortality rate in patients with D1 was 6.7%. In the D2 group it was 6.8%. Median survival was 42.9 months in D1 and 55 months in D2. The disease-free interval was 49 months for D1 and 58 months for D2. Conclusion. The learning curve for D2 lymphadenectomy presents acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality, providing that the technique is learnt at a center with extensive experience.

Results of R0 surgery with D2 lymphadenectomy for the treatment of localised gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Surgical excision is the best therapeutic option for gastric cancer, provided it is performed with curative intent as R0 surgery. And, according to many authors, D2 lymphadenectomy may be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on a series of 126 consecutive cases of gastric cancer treated with gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy. A R0 resection was done in 99 cases (78.6%).

RESULTS

Total gastrectomy was performed in 70 patients and subtotal gastrectomy in 29. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 32.5 per patient. Suture dehiscence occurred in 3 patients (in one of them in the esophago-jejunal anastomosis). Hospital mortality was 2%. Twenty-six recurrences were detected after a median follow-up of 73.6 months. Five-year actuarial survival was 65%. Five-year survival of patients with positive lymph nodes at the N2 level was 26.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy may be performed with low morbidity and mortality. R0 resection allows acceptable survival rates to be achieved. There is even a group of patients with invaded lymph nodes at the N2 level surviving at 5 years. It appears to be very important that this surgery is performed by specialised surgeons.