'Escape' ovulation in women due to the missing of low dose combination oral contraceptive pills

U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024

The 2024 U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use (U.S. SPR) addresses a selected group of common, yet sometimes complex, issues regarding initiation and use of specific contraceptive methods. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and a meeting with national experts in Atlanta, Georgia, during January 25-27, 2023. The information in this report replaces the 2016 U.S. SPR (CDC. U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR 2016;65[No. RR-4]:1-66). Notable updates include 1) updated recommendations for provision of medications for intrauterine device placement, 2) updated recommendations for bleeding irregularities during implant use, 3) new recommendations for testosterone use and risk for pregnancy, and 4) new recommendations for self-administration of injectable contraception. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of evidence-based clinical practice guidance for health care providers. The goals of these recommendations are to remove unnecessary medical barriers to accessing and using contraception and to support the provision of person-centered contraceptive counseling and services in a noncoercive manner. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking contraceptive services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients; when needed, patients should seek advice from their health care providers about contraceptive use.

Efficacy of the 1-year (13-cycle) segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system: results of two multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trials

Background

A ring-shaped, contraceptive vaginal system designed to last 1 year (13 cycles) delivers an average of 0·15 mg segesterone acetate and 0·013 mg ethinylestradiol per day. We evaluated the efficacy of this contraceptive vaginal system and return to menses or pregnancy after use.

Methods

In two identically designed, multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trials (one at 15 US academic and community sites and one at 12 US and international academic and community sites), participants followed a 21-days-in, 7-days-out segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system schedule for up to 13 cycles. Participants were healthy, sexually active, non-pregnant, non-sterilised women aged 18–40 years. Women were cautioned that any removals during the 21 days of cyclic use should not exceed 2 h, and used daily paper diaries to record vaginal system use. Consistent with regulatory requirements for contraceptives, we calculated the Pearl Index for women aged 35 years and younger, excluding adjunctive contraception cycles, as the primary efficacy outcome measure. We also did intention-to-treat Kaplan-Meier life table analyses and followed up women who did not use hormonal contraceptives or desired pregnancy after study completion for 6 months for return to menses or pregnancy. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00455156 and NCT00263341.

Findings

Between Dec 19, 2006, and Oct 9, 2009, at the 15 US sites, and between Nov 1, 2006, and July 2, 2009, at the 12 US and international sites we enrolled 2278 women. Our overall efficacy analysis included 2265 participants (1130 in the US study and 1135 in the international study) and 1303 (57·5%) participants completed up to 13 cycles. The Pearl Index for the primary efficacy group was 2·98 (95% CI 2·13–4·06) per 100 woman-years, and was well within the range indicative of efficacy for a contraceptive under a woman's control. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the contraceptive vaginal system was 97·5% effective, which provided further evidence of efficacy. Pregnancy occurrence was similar across cycles. All 290 follow-up participants reported return to menses or became pregnant (24 [63%] of 38 women who desired pregnancy) within 6 months.

Interpretation

The segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system is an effective contraceptive for 13 consecutive cycles of use. This new product adds to the contraceptive method mix and the 1-year duration of use means that women do not need to return to the clinic or pharmacy for refills every few months.

Funding

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health, the US Agency for International Development, and the WHO Reproductive Health Research Department.

Pharmacodynamics of combined estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives 3. Inhibition of ovulation

INTRODUCTION

Following a historical overview, the ovulation-inhibiting effect of various orally administered estrogen-progestin combinations (combined oral contraceptives [COCs]) are examined for their components alone or in the various combined formulations. Special emphasis is given to products containing natural estrogens. Areas covered: Inhibition of ovulation with progestins alone; estrogens alone; various progestins in combination with ethinyl estradiol; various progestins in combination with natural estrogens (estradiol, estradiol valerate, and estetrol). Expert commentary: The original idea to achieve ovulation blockage through the administration of steroid hormones involved the use a progestogen (both progesterone and its synthetic homologous). The ability of a progestin to inhibit ovulation depends on the type of compound and on its dosage and a difference of more than 20-fold in activity exists between compounds utilized today in COCs. Initially, the estrogenic component was present only because it contaminated the first progestin utilized. It was soon found that an estrogen is necessary for proper cycle control. It was also found that the estrogen acts synergistically in inhibiting ovulation. For almost half a century, most COCs contained ethinyl estradiol. Today, also natural estrogens are being employed. Inhibition of ovulation was complete with all early high dose preparations. Decreasing dosage allowed some ovarian activity to occur, occasionally leading to a mature follicle. Even in this situation, defective corpus luteum formation assured contraceptive protection.

Therapeutic, prophylactic, untoward, and contraceptive effects of combined oral contraceptives: catholic teaching, natural law, and the principle of double effect when deciding to prescribe and use

Combined oral contraceptives (COC) have been demonstrated to have significant benefits for the treatment and prevention of disease. These medications also are associated with untoward health effects, and they may be directly contraceptive. Prescribers and users must compare and weigh the intended beneficial health effects against foreseeable but unintended possible adverse effects in their decisions to prescribe and use. Additionally, those who intend to abide by Catholic teachings must consider prohibitions against contraception. Ethical judgments concerning both health benefits and contraception are approached in this essay through an overview of the therapeutic, prophylactic, untoward, and contraceptive effects of COC and discussion of magisterial and traditional Catholic teachings from natural law. Discerning through the principle of double effect, proportionate reason, and evidence gathered from the sciences, medical and moral conclusions are drawn that we believe to be fully compliant with good medicine and Catholic teaching.

Effect of missed combined hormonal contraceptives on contraceptive effectiveness: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) are popular methods of reversible contraception in the United States, but adherence remains an issue as reflected in their lower rates of typical use effectiveness. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate evidence on the effect of missed CHCs on pregnancy rates as well as surrogate measures of contraceptive effectiveness (e.g., ovulation, follicular development, changes in hormone levels, cervical mucus quality).

STUDY DESIGN

We searched the PubMed database for peer-reviewed articles published in any language from database inception through April 2012. We included studies that examined measures of contraceptive effectiveness during cycles with extended hormone-free intervals or nonadherence (e.g., omission of pills, delayed patch replacement) on days not adjacent to the hormone-free interval. We used standard abstract forms and grading systems to summarize and assess the quality of the evidence.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 1387 articles, of which 26 met our study selection criteria. There is wide variability in the amount of follicular development and risk of ovulation among women who extended the pill-free interval to 8-14 days; in general, the risk of ovulation was low, and among women who did ovulate, cycles were usually abnormal (i.e., low progesterone levels, small follicles and/or poor cervical mucus) (Level I, good, indirect to Level II-3, fair, indirect). Studies of women who missed one to four consecutive pills or 1-3 consecutive days of delay before patch replacement at times other than adjacent to the hormone-free interval reported little follicular activity and low risk of ovulation (Level I, fair, indirect to Level II-3, poor, indirect). Studies comparing 30 mcg versus 20 mcg mc ethinyl estradiol pills showed more follicular activity when 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol pills were missed (Level I, good, indirect).

CONCLUSION

Most of the studies in this evidence base relied on surrogate measures of pregnancy risk and ranged in quality. For studies providing indirect evidence on the effects of missed CHCs, it is unclear how differences in surrogate measures correspond to pregnancy risk. Fewer studies examined the transdermal patch and vaginal ring than combined oral contraceptives.

Ovarian activity in obese and nonobese women treated with three transdermal contraceptive patches delivering three different doses of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel

BACKGROUND

The effect of obesity on ovarian follicular suppression in women using low-estrogen dose contraceptive patches has not been determined.

STUDY DESIGN

A Phase II, parallel-group, multicenter, three-cycle study evaluated three patches containing different ethinyl estradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG) doses. Serum levels of EE, LNG, sex hormone-binding globulin and progesterone were compared in 41 obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥30] and 75 nonobese (BMI <30) women.

RESULTS

Suppression of ovulation during the luteal phase was dose dependent, with the highest dose (AG200-15) preventing progesterone increases in all women (cycles 2-3). In the follicular phase, the lowest-dose patch had the highest rate of increased progesterone in nonobese subjects. Progesterone levels ≥3.0 ng/mL in the follicular phase were more common in obese than nonobese women.

CONCLUSIONS

AG200-15 suppresses ovulation in obese and nonobese women. All three patches found increased progesterone in the follicular phase, albeit more in obese versus nonobese women.

Missed hormonal contraceptives: new recommendations

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based guidance for women and their health care providers on the management of missed or delayed hormonal contraceptive doses in order to prevent unintended pregnancy.

EVIDENCE

Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database were searched for articles published in English, from 1974 to 2007, about hormonal contraceptive methods that are available in Canada and that may be missed or delayed. Relevant publications and position papers from appropriate reproductive health and family planning organizations were also reviewed. The quality of evidence is rated using the criteria developed by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

This committee opinion will help health care providers offer clear information to women who have not been adherent in using hormonal contraception with the purpose of preventing unintended pregnancy.

SPONSORS

The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: 1. Instructions for what women should do when they miss hormonal contraception have been complex and women do not understand them correctly. (I) 2. The highest risk of ovulation occurs when the hormone-free interval is prolonged for more than seven days, either by delaying the start of combined hormonal contraceptives or by missing active hormone doses during the first or third weeks of combined oral contraceptives. (II) Ovulation rarely occurs after seven consecutive days of combined oral contraceptive use. (II) RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Health care providers should give clear, simple instructions, both written and oral, on missed hormonal contraceptive pills as part of contraceptive counselling. (III-A) 2. Health care providers should provide women with telephone/electronic resources for reference in the event of missed or delayed hormonal contraceptives. (III-A) 3. In order to avoid an increased risk of unintended pregnancy, the hormone-free interval should not exceed seven days in combined hormonal contraceptive users. (II-A) 4. Back-up contraception should be used after one missed dose in the first week of hormones until seven consecutive days of correct hormone use are established. In the case of missed combined hormonal contraceptives in the second or third week of hormones, the hormone-free interval should be eliminated for that cycle. (III-A) 5. Emergency contraception and back-up contraception may be required in some instances of missed hormonal contraceptives, in particular when the hormone-free interval has been extended for more than seven days. (III-A) 6. Back-up contraception should be used when three or more consecutive doses/days of combined hormonal contraceptives are missed in the second and third week until seven consecutive days of correct hormone use are established. For practical reasons, the scheduled hormone-free interval should be eliminated in these cases. (II-A) 7. Emergency contraception is rarely indicated for missed combined hormonal contraceptives in the second or third week of the cycle unless there are repeated omissions or failure to institute back-up contraception after the missed doses. In cases of repeated omissions of combined hormonal contraceptives, emergency contraception may be required, and back-up contraception should be used. Health care professionals should counsel women in these situations on alternative methods of contraception that do not demand such stringent compliance. (III-A).

Effective use of hormonal contraceptives

This systematic review examines evidence regarding when during the menstrual cycle a woman can initiate combined oral contraceptive (COC) use and what can be done if a woman misses COCs. We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for articles published from 1966 to March 2005 related to COC initiation and to the effects of late or missed COCs. We identified 11 studies related to COC initiation and 25 studies related to the effects of missed pills. Evidence from these studies suggested that taking hormonally active pills for 7 consecutive days prevents normal ovulation and that initiating COCs through Day 5 of the menstrual cycle suppresses follicular activity. Studies on the effects of missed COCs generally showed that the risk of ovulation is greatest when the pill-free interval lasts >7 days. Limitations of this body of evidence include small sample sizes that may not reflect variation in larger populations, lack of a standard measurement of ovulation and difficulty in discerning how ovulation resulting from late or missed COCs corresponds to the risk of conception.

Maintenance of ovulation inhibition with the 75-microg desogestrel-only contraceptive pill (Cerazette) after scheduled 12-h delays in tablet intake

BACKGROUND

In contrast to traditional progestagen-only pills (POPs), the desogestrel-only pill Cerazette consistently inhibits ovulation. This study was performed to test the hypothesis that desogestrel alone will keep inhibiting ovulation even when pills are taken 12 h late, indicating that delays in tablet intake of up to 12 h do not jeopardize contraceptive efficacy.

METHODS

Women aged between 19 and 40 years with confirmed ovulation were admitted to this open-label pharmacodynamic study. They were treated with Cerazette for 56 days with three tablets to be taken 12 h late, having been randomized to a regimen with scheduled late tablets on Days 39, 42 and 49 (Group A) or on Days 11, 14 and 21 (Group B). The occurrence of ovulation during treatment was determined by measuring progesterone serum levels every 2 days.

RESULTS

One of the 103 treated subjects ovulated during treatment. The ovulation incidence thus amounts to 1.0% (two-sided 95% confidence interval 0.02-5.29%). There was no apparent relationship between these ovulations and scheduled late tablets. The minimum time to first posttreatment ovulation was 7 days, whereas it took 17.2 days on average from last tablet intake until ovulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Ovulation inhibition with Cerazette is maintained after 12-h delays in tablet intake and return of ovulation takes at least 7 days. These properties distinguish Cerazette from all other POPs.

Modeling and simulation of adherence: approaches and applications in therapeutics

Partial adherence with a prescribed or randomly assigned dose gives rise to unintended variability in actual drug exposure in clinical practice and during clinical trials. There are tremendous costs associated with incomplete and/or improper drug intake-to both individual patients and society as a whole. Methodology for quantifying the relation between adherence, exposure and drug response is an area of active research. Modeling and statistical approaches have been useful in evaluating the impact of adherence on therapeutics and in addressing the challenges of confounding and measurement error which arise in this context. This paper reviews quantitative approaches to using adherence information in improving therapeutics. It draws heavily on applications in the area of HIV pharmacology.

Ovarian follicular development is initiated during the hormone-free interval of oral contraceptive use

We evaluated ovarian follicular development in women during compliant use of oral contraceptives (OC). Thirty-six healthy women received: [35 microg ethinyl estradiol (21)/180 microg norgestimate (7), 215 microg norgestimate (7), 250 microg norgestimate (7)]; [30 microg ethinyl estradiol (21)/150 microg desogestrel (21)]; or [20 microg ethinyl estradiol (21)/100 microg levonorgestrel (21)] for 3 consecutive 28-day cycles. Transvaginal ultrasonography was performed every third day to monitor follicular development. If a follicle reached > or = 14 mm, ultrasonography was performed daily and blood drawn every other day to determine estradiol-17beta concentrations. Seventeen of 36 women (47%) grew follicles > or = 10 mm. Nine of the 17 women (53%) grew follicles > or = 14 mm, in association with increased serum concentrations of estradiol-17beta. Thirty-seven of 43 follicles > or = 10 mm (86%) emerged during the hormone-free interval (HFI). No ovulations were observed. Our results supported the hypothesis that follicular development to an ostensibly ovulatory diameter occurs during compliant OC use, in association with loss of endocrine suppression during the HFI.

Plasma concentrations of endogenous hormones during one regular treatment cycle with a low-dose oral contraceptive and during two cycles with deliberate omission of two tablets

In this open, prospective, phase-I study we closely monitored levels of endogenous progesterone, 17beta-estradiol, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone in six healthy women. We determined plasma concentrations every 1-3 days during one untreated baseline cycle and during the first treatment cycle with regular pill intake of an oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol plus 75 microg gestodene. During the following two treatment cycles, two tablets were deliberately omitted (in cycle 2 on days 6/7 and in cycle 3 on days 11/12). All but possibly one volunteer ovulated in the untreated pre-cycle, as concluded from LH peaks followed by marked increases of progesterone. During the regular first treatment cycle and even after deliberate omission of two tables in treatment cycles 2 and 3, the progesterone and estradiol levels remained low, so that we concluded that no ovulation took place. However, two volunteers showed some sort of LH peak in the first regular treatment cycle and all women showed LH increases of > 40 microg/ml in at least one omission cycle. In ten out of 12 cycles, omissions of pill intake were followed by an episode of intermenstrual bleeding. In conclusion, we have shown that, after omission of two consecutive oral contraceptive tables, the endogenous hormone parameters did not provide evidence for ovulation. Although this provides confirmation of the robustness of this oral contraceptive towards non-compliance, the widely published practical recommendations should be followed.

Ovarian follicular development during the use of oral contraception: a review

Over the past 40 years, alterations to the composition of oral contraceptives (OCs) have been made in attempts to reduce adverse effects and to improve patient compliance while maintaining contraceptive efficacy. However, there is growing evidence to indicate that reducing the estrogen dose to minimize adverse effects may have compromised the degree of hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian suppression, particularly during the hormone-free interval (HFI) or following missed doses. Follicle development during OC use appears to occur in association with a loss of endocrine suppression during the HFI. This information provides a rationale for reducing or eliminating the HFI in OC regimens. There is also evidence for an increased risk of follicle development and ovulation in women who use delayed OC initiation schemes, such as the "Sunday Start" method. It is not currently known why some follicles ovulate during OC use while others regress or form anovulatory follicle cysts. Continued research about follicle development during OC use would provide insight into understanding the precise mechanisms of action underlying combined OCs, as well as those of continuous OC formulations and emergency contraceptive regimens.

Shorter pill-free interval in combined oral contraceptives decreases follicular development

The objective of the study was to determine the suppressive effect on ovarian activity of 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol plus 75 micrograms gestodene administered for 21 or 23 days. The study was designed as a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial in 60 women. A pre-treatment cycle, three treatment cycles and a post-treatment period were monitored by ovarian ultrasound and by LH, FSH, 17 beta-estradiol and progesterone measurements every other day. No ovulation and no luteinized, unruptured follicle were observed. Suppression of ovarian activity was more pronounced by the 23-day regimen. 17 beta-Estradiol serum levels during the last six days of a cycle and during the first six days of the next cycle were significantly less (p < 0.05) in the 23-day regimen. The superiority of the 23-day regimen in comparison to the 21-day regimen with regard to the suppression of ovarian activity was shown in this study. The observed differences in the 17 beta-estradiol levels and follicular development between a 21-day and 23-day preparation combine to suggest that shortening the pill-free interval in combined oral contraceptives may increase the contraceptive safety margin in women on low-dose formulations.

The combined oral contraceptive pill: what advice should we give when tablets are missed?

Despite more than 30 years' experience with the pill, being by far the most thoroughly studied drug ever, we must conclude that there still is a remarkable paucity of data that would allow us to assess unambiguously its margins of efficacy. The physiological studies on which we must rely encompass limited numbers of subjects and are unlikely to include sufficient representatives of the vulnerable minority of women that really matter. Even though we realise that this vulnerable minority is there, we still cannot do better than to hypothesise about their characteristics, let alone identify them in advance. This lack of knowledge has contributed to the existence of diverging views on how to advise the general population of pill takers about missed tablets. Against this background, we felt there was a need to make an inventory of the existing data and, subsequently, to incorporate them in advice that in our opinion is most appropriate in the current state of knowledge. We have come to the conclusion, in contrast to what is often held, that it is not the number of tablets missed, but rather the timing relative to the pill-free interval that determines the impact of noncompliance. We further conclude that shortening of the pill-free interval to five or six days could substantially improve the efficacy of the pill: at the low doses currently used in oral contraceptives the total steroid burden would not be substantially increased, while still allowing withdrawal bleeding to occur.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Role of patient compliance in clinical pharmacokinetics. A review of recent research

Until 1986 to 1987, the estimation of patient compliance with prescribed drug regimens in ambulatory care relied on methods that were biased either by their subjectivity or by the improvement in compliance that commonly occurs during the day or two prior to a scheduled examination, so called 'white-coat compliance'. In 1986 to 1987, 2 objective methods were developed: electronic monitoring and low-dose, slow-turnover chemical markers (digoxin or phenobarbital [phenobarbitone]) incorporated into dosage forms. While neither method is without limitations, both have enabled major advances in the understanding of patients' compliance with dosage regimens and, thus, the spectrum of drug exposure in ambulatory care. The new methods have also triggered not only a revival of interest in patient compliance and its determinants, but also new statistical approaches to interpreting the clinical correlates of widely variable drug administration, and thus drug exposure, in drug trials. The marker methods prove dose ingestion during the 3 to 7 days prior to blood sampling, but do not reveal the timing of doses. The electronic monitoring methods, i.e. time and date-stamping microcircuitry incorporated into drug packages, provide a continuous record of timing of presumptive doses throughout periods of many months, but do not prove dose ingestion. The electronic record has been judged robust enough to detect certain types of investigator fraud, and to support modelling projections of the complete time course of the plasma drug concentration during a trial. Both marker and electronic methods show that the predominant errors are those of omission, i.e. delays or omissions of scheduled doses. Patient interviews, diaries, and counts of returned, untaken doses have been shown by both marker and electronic monitoring methods to consistently and substantially to overestimate compliance. Monitoring of plasma drug concentrations also overestimates compliance, because white-coat compliance is prevalent, and the pharmacokinetic turnover of most drugs is rapid enough that measured concentrations of drug in plasma reflect only drug administration during the period of white-coat compliance. Thus, compliance is a great deal poorer in clinical trials than has been revealed by the older methods. The long-standing underestimation of poor compliance in drug trials has many implications for the interpretation of drug trials, for optimal dose estimation, for the interpretation of failed drug therapy, and for accurate labelling of prescription drugs.

Introducing the low-dose pill to Bangladesh; issues of continuation and failure

In response to government plans to introduce a low-dose pill to the national family planning program of Bangladesh, a comparison of the performance of low-dose and standard-dose pills among a rural Bangladeshi population was conducted. Continuation rates were found to be better among users of the low-dose pill and there was no evidence that failure rates were higher. The relative risk (standard-dose vs. low-dose) over the first 30 months following adoption was 1.25 for first method continuation, and 1.29 for extended use failure. This paper, thus, provides evidence that low-dose pills may be a suitable method of contraception for rural Bangladeshi women.

Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian activity under oral contraceptives

The trend towards changing the composition of the contraceptive pill in order to decrease side effects might lead to increased ovarian activity. This may decrease reliability. Therefore, a non-invasive method for monitoring the suppressive effect of the pill on ovarian function is warranted. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether or not diagnostic ultrasound might be the method of choice for studying residual ovarian activity during pill use. In 89 women on a low-dose oral contraceptive (30 mcg ethinyl-estradiol (EE)/75 mcg gestodene), the first two months of pill-intake were monitored extensively with diagnostic ultrasound. The study revealed that only one ultrasound investigation was needed during the first week of pill intake to discover all relevant cases of residual ovarian activity. Follow-up investigations are needed to quantify this activity more specifically.

The effect of follicular growth and luteal function of "missing the pill". A comparison between a monophasic and a triphasic combined oral contraceptive

The effects of follicular growth and hormonal indices of the deliberate omission of two low-dose combined oral contraceptives, a monophasic 130 micrograms ethinylestradiol + 150 micrograms desorgestrel) and a triphasic (30 micrograms ethinylestradiol + 50 micrograms levonorgestrel for 6 days, followed by 40 micrograms ethinylestradiol + 75 micrograms levonorgestrel for 5 days and 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol + 125 micrograms levonorgestrel for 10 days) combination during the first three days of one contraceptive pill cycle was studied in two groups of 10 women each. Follicular growth was followed by ultrasound scanning and plasma levels of estradiol, and progesterone were measured every other day until day 19 of the contraceptive pill cycle. In each group, ovulation occurred in one subject and 4 women reacted with follicular activity only, while 5 women on the monophasic and 3 on the triphasic formulation exhibited complete ovarian suppression. Two subjects on the triphasic preparation showed follicular growth followed by insufficient luteal function. Thus, the risk of escape ovulation when the pill-free interval is prolonged to 10 days in women taking low-dose combined oral contraceptive pills, is low (1/10).

Gonadotropin and estradiol secretion during the week of placebo therapy in oral contraceptive pill users

The changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis during the placebo week in oral contraceptive pill users were assessed. Fifteen women using the combined oral contraceptive pill were studied for eight hours at the start and at the end of the placebo week and gonadotropin secretion and estradiol concentrations were compared with those in control women in the follicular phase of an unmedicated menstrual cycle. Both gonadotropin and estradiol concentrations were suppressed at the start of the placebo week. By day 7 of placebo, gonadotropin concentrations and pulse patterns were indistinguishable from those of the control subjects although estradiol concentrations were still significantly lower.

Longitudinal ultrasonographic study of the ovarian suppressive activity of a low-dose triphasic oral contraceptive during correct and incorrect pill intake

A longitudinal study was conducted to evaluate the ability of a low-dose triphasic oral contraceptive to suppress ovulation as documented by frequent ultrasonographic scanning and progesterone determinations, even in the event of a missed pill. The extent of follicular growth and maturation, the incidence of escape ovulation, and the effect of correct and incorrect pill intake were assessed in 30 evaluable women during two consecutive spontaneous menstrual cycles. After the first cycle, 11 of 30 women (36.6%) had follicle-like structures of at least 10 mm in diameter. Ten of 11 structures gradually disappeared during the second cycle, with one persistent structure remaining through the second cycle. Seven of 30 women (23%) developed follicle-like structures during the second cycle. Of these, one woman had a probable ovulation, and another had an elevated progesterone level without follicle rupture, suggesting the luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome. Both of these women missed a pill on day 1 of the second cycle. In all cases cervical scores indicating hostility were noted. Thus, although suppression of ovarian activity may have been incomplete when oral contraceptives were incorrectly taken, secondary mechanisms of contraception remained operant. When they were correctly taken, low-dose triphasic oral contraception consistently prevented ovulation.

The effect of deliberate omission of Trinordiol or Microgynon on the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis

The effect of deliberate omission of a phased formulation pill, Trinordiol (ethinyl estradiol 30 micrograms + levonorgestrel 50 micrograms: 6 tablets; ethinyl estradiol 40 micrograms + levonorgestrel 75 micrograms: 5 tablets; ethinyl estradiol 30 micrograms + levonorgestrel 125 micrograms: 10 tablets) or a low-dose, combined, oral contraceptive pill, Microgynon (ethinyl estradiol 30 micrograms + levonorgestrel 150 micrograms: 21 tablets) on the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis were studied. Thirty-six women were recruited to the study and divided equally between the two types of pill. Medication was begun on the 8th pill-free day of the cycle and continued for 7 days (Group 1), 14 days (Group 2) or 21 days (Group 3). Levels of FSH, LH, estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) were measured in plasma on alternate days during the final week of pill therapy, and daily for the 7 days after stopping the pill. For the first 2 weeks of pill therapy, follicular activity, as judged by plasma levels of E2, was greater in women taking Trinordiol than in those taking Microgynon, but was similar in both groups by the third week of pill treatment. Five women taking Trinordiol (2 in Group 1 and 3 in Group 2) had plasma levels of E2 in excess of 500 pmol/l whilst taking the pills, and only 1 patient achieved this degree of follicular activity after stopping the tablets. One woman who had taken 7 days of Trinordiol (Group 1) showed a rise of plasma levels of P to 6.8 nmol/l, but luteinization did not occur in any of the remaining 35 women who took Trinordiol or Microgynon. These findings suggest that follicular activity is less completely suppressed by Trinordiol than Microgynon, at least in the first 2 weeks of pill therapy, but that normal ovulation is still a rare event in the week after cessation of either of these pills, even if only 7 days of medication have been taken.

Hormonal consequences of missing the pill during the first two days of three consecutive artificial cycles

The hormonal effects of the deliberate omission of a low-dose combined oral contraceptive pill (30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol + 150 micrograms levonorgestrel) during the first two days of three consecutive artificial cycles were studied in 10 women. The plasma levels of estradiol, progesterone, levonorgestrel and--whenever justified--of LH were measured three times weekly (Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays) throughout a 90-day period, and the ovarian reaction to the prolongation of the pill-free period from 7 to 9 days was assessed. One subject (with a premature LH surge) showed a marked follicular and an inadequate luteal activity in 2 of 3 cycles. The remaining cycles were characterized by a varying degree of follicular activity associated with the absence of any luteal function. None of the subjects exhibited peripheral steroid levels indicating a normal ovulatory cycle. The results are interpreted as suggesting that repeated prolongation of the pill-free period from 7 to 9 days might result in a gradual increase in ovarian activity.

Why do inadvertent pregnancies occur in oral contraceptive users? Effectiveness of oral contraceptive regimens and interfering factors

Inadvertent pregnancies in combined pill users are not uncommon, and are usually due to errors of tablet taking. However, many factors may contribute to 'pill failure'. In this review the endocrine pharmacology of pill use and the changes reported with missed pills have been considered in detail. The influences of other factors including drug interactions have been reviewed and a series of recommendations made for reducing the risk of pregnancy in each of these circumstances.

A study of interaction of low-dose combination oral contraceptive with Ampicillin and Metronidazole

Plasma levels of norethisterone (NET), ethinyl estradiol (EE), Ampicillin or Metronidazole were estimated in 16 women, who were taking low-dose oral combination contraceptive pills (containing norethisterone acetate 1 mg and ethinyl estradiol 30 microgram) and in whom concurrently, either Ampicillin (6 women) or Metronidazole therapy (10 women) was given. Neither Ampicillin nor Metronidazole therapy altered the 'peak' or 24-hour plasma levels and area under the curve, for NET and EE. Furthermore, oral contraceptive treatment did not alter the 'peak' levels of Ampicillin or Metronidazole. Progesterone (P) levels were in the anovulatory range in all Ampicillin treated cycles. However, in Metronidazole treated group, two out of 10 women showed a P rise of more than 4 ng/ml. The study was expanded to include another group of 15 women treated with Metronidazole, where only one women showed a P rise of more than 4 ng/ml. The occurrence of 'escape ovulation' as suggested by P rise of more than 4 ng/ml in three out of 25 Metronidazole treated women is either a chance incidence due to a different pharmacological response in them, or most probably due to the default in the regular intake of pills in these women. This is supported by the observation that one out of three women showing a P rise (greater than 4 ng/ml( during concurrent Metronidazole therapy, also showed ovulatory P values in oral contraceptive-only treated cycles. Furthermore, in the control group also, one out of 10 women had ovulatory P levels (greater than 4 ng/ml) in oral contraceptive-only treated cycles.