Interaction of topiramate with conventional antiepileptic drugs in mice

The effects of cimetidine chronic treatment on conventional antiepileptic drugs in mice

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 1-day, 7-day and 14-day administrations of cimetidine on the anticonvulsant activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs; valproate, carbamazepine, phenytoin and phenobarbital) against maximal electroshock (MES)-induced convulsions in mice.

METHODS

Electroconvulsions were evoked in Albino Swiss mice by a current delivered via ear-clip electrodes. In addition, the effects of cimetidine, AEDs alone and their combinations were studied on performance and long-term memory tests. Pharmacokinetic changes in plasma and brain concentrations of AEDs after cimetidine administration were evaluated with immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

Cimetidine (up to 100mg/kg) after 1-day administration did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold in animals. Moreover, in the 14-day treatment, cimetidine administered at a dose of 40mg/kg did not significantly change the electroconvulsive threshold in the MES-test, cimetidine administered 14-day (at 20mg/kg) significantly increased the anticonvulsant activity of carbamazepine, staying without effects after a 1-day and 7-day studies. In contrast, both the 7-day and 14-day administrations of cimetidine resulted in significant reductions of protective efficacy of the phenobarbital. Only valproate and phenytoin were not affected by cimetidine (20mg/kg) in all experimental period. Cimetidine administered 1-day, did not alter total brain concentrations and free plasma levels of all AEDs tested, whilst the 14-day study elevated carbamazepine plasma and brain concentration and reduced phenobarbital brain concentration. Cimetidine co-applied with AEDs did not impair performance of mice evaluated in the chimney test however, it worsened long-term memory in animals.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this preclinical study, a special caution is advised when treating epileptic patients with combinations of phenobarbital or carbamazepine with cimetidine.

Antiepileptic drug-induced neuronal cell death in the immature brain: effects of carbamazepine, topiramate, and levetiracetam as monotherapy versus polytherapy

The aim of this study was to test the potential neurotoxicity of three antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), carbamazepine (5H-dibenzepine-5-carboxamide), topiramate [2,3:4,5-bis-O-(1-methylethylidene)-beta-d-fructopyranose sulfamate], and levetiracetam [2-(2-oxopyrrolidin-1-yl)butanamide], in the developing rat brain, when given alone or in combinations. The extent of cell death induced by AEDs was measured in several brain regions of rat pups (postnatal day 8) by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling assay 24 h after drug treatment. Carbamazepine alone did not increase neurodegeneration when given in doses up to 50 mg/kg, but it induced significant cell death at 100 mg/kg. When combined with phenytoin, carbamazepine, 50 but not 25 mg/kg, significantly exacerbated phenytoin-induced cell death. Although topiramate (20-80 mg/kg) alone caused no neurodegeneration, all doses exacerbated phenytoin-induced neurodegeneration. Levetiracetam (250-1000 mg/kg) alone did not induce cell death, nor did it exacerbate phenytoin-induced neurodegeneration. Of the combinations examined, only that of levetiracetam (250 mg/kg) with carbamazepine (50 mg/kg) did not induce neurodegeneration. Our data underscore the importance of evaluating the safety of combinations of AEDs given during development and not merely extrapolating from the effects of exposure to single drugs. Although carbamazepine and topiramate alone did not induce neuronal death, both drugs exacerbated phenytoin-induced cell death. In contrast, because cotreatment with levetiracetam and carbamazepine did not enhance cell death in the developing brain, it may be possible to avoid proapoptotic effects, even in polytherapy, by choosing appropriate drugs. The latter drugs, as monotherapy or in combination, may be promising candidates for the treatment of women during pregnancy and for preterm and neonatal infants.

Synergistic combinations of anticonvulsant agents: what is the evidence from animal experiments?

PURPOSE

Combination therapy is often used in the treatment of seizures refractory to monotherapy. At the same time, the pharmacodynamic mechanisms that determine the combined efficacy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are unknown, and this prevents a rational use of these drug combinations. We critically evaluate the existing evidence for pharmacodynamic synergism between AEDs from preclinical studies in animal models of epilepsy to identify useful combinations of mechanisms and to determine whether study outcome depends on the various research methods that are in use.

METHODS

Published articles were included if the studies were placebo-controlled, in vivo, or ex vivo animal studies investigating marketed or experimental AEDs. The animal models that were used in these studies, the primary molecular targets of the tested drugs, and the methods of interpretation were recorded. The potential association of these factors with the study outcome (synergism: yes or no) was assessed through logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 107 studies were identified, in which 536 interaction experiments were conducted. In 54% of these experiments, the possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction was not investigated. The majority of studies were conducted in the maximal electroshock model, and other established models were the pentylenetetrazole model, amygdala kindling, and the DBA/2 model. By far the most widely used method for interpretation of the results was evaluation of the effect of a threshold dose of one agent on the median effective dose (ED50) of another agent. Experiments relying on this method found synergism significantly more often compared with experiments relying on other methods (p<0.001). Furthermore, experiments including antagonists of the AMPA receptor were more likely to find synergism in comparison with all other experiments (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive preclinical research into the effects of AED combinations has not led to an understanding of the pharmacodynamic properties of AED combinations. Specifically, the majority of the preclinical studies are not adequately designed to distinguish between additive, synergistic, and antagonistic interactions. Quantitative pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies of selectively acting AEDs in a battery of animal models are necessary for the development of truly synergistic drug combinations.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction studies of loreclezole with felbamate, lamotrigine, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure model

PURPOSE

The study investigated the types of interactions between loreclezole (LCZ) and a variety of newly licensed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with different mechanisms of actions [felbamate (FBM), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), and oxcarbazepine (OXC)] by isobolographic analysis.

METHODS

Anticonvulsant and adverse-effect profiles of combinations of LCZ with other AEDs at fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 were investigated in the maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizures and the chimney test (as a measure of motor impairment) in mice so as to identify optimal combinations. Protective indices (PIs) and benefit indices (BIs) were calculated so that a ranking in relation to advantageous combinations could be established.

RESULTS

With isobolography, it was observed that the combination of LCZ and TPM, at the fixed ratios of 1:1 and 3:1, was supraadditive (synergistic; p < 0.05), whereas LCZ with TPM at the fixed ratio of 1:3 and LCZ combined with LTG, FBM, or OXC at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 were associated with additive interactions. Moreover, the isobolographic analysis in the chimney test revealed that only one combination tested (LCZ and TPM at the fixed ratio of 1:1) was subadditive (antagonistic; p < 0.05), whereas the remaining combinations of LCZ with LTG, FBM, or OXC (at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1) barely displayed additivity. However, these combinations were associated with significant pharmacokinetic interactions, in that LCZ increased brain TPM (94%), OXC (21%), FBM (46%), and LTG (8%) concentrations. In addition, brain LCZ concentrations were decreased by TPM (26%), OXC (37%), LTG (42%), and FBM (19%). None of the examined combinations between LCZ and TPM, OXC, LTG, and FBM altered long-term memory in the step-through passive-avoidance task.

CONCLUSIONS

LCZ plus TPM appears to be a particularly favorable combination, based on the MES test and the chimney test. LCZ and OXC also is a favorable combination. However, these conclusions are confounded by the fact that LCZ is associated with significant pharmacokinetic interactions.

Isobolographic and subthreshold methods in the detection of interactions between oxcarbazepine and conventional antiepileptics--a comparative study

Until now, a character of interactions among the antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), in some experimental models of epilepsy, has been determined alternatively with subthreshold and isobolographic methods. In order to elicit the precise and adequate method for evaluating two drug interactions, the comparative study was performed in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test in mice. In this experimental model, the exact types of interactions among oxcarbazepine (OXC) and conventional AEDs (diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital, valproate, carbamazepine, and clonazepam) were determined with both methods. Results from the subthreshold method showed a considerable reduction of ED(50) values of clonazepam, diphenylhydantoin and valproate (after administration of OXC at the highest subthreshold dose of 2.5 mg/kg), whilst ED(50)s of carbamazepine or phenobarbital were almost unchanged when OXC (2.5 mg/kg) was co-administered with these AEDs. Results from the 2-dimensional (2-D) isobolographic analysis of interactions for a 50% anticonvulsant effect, for three fixed drug dose ratio combinations of 1:2, 1:1, and 2:1, indicate antagonism between OXC and diphenylhydantoin as regards their anticonvulsant (protective) activity. Furthermore, the interactions between OXC and clonazepam occurred either antagonistic (for the fixed-ratios of 1:4 and 1:3) or synergistic (for the fixed-ratio combinations of 1:1 and 2:1) depending on the proportions of used drugs. Remaining interactions between OXC and carbamazepine, OXC and valproate, or OXC and phenobarbital (for the fixed-ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1) were isobolographically additive for a 50% anticonvulsant effect tested. The 3-dimensional (3-D) isobolographic analysis of interactions between OXC and CZP revealed that the dual character of interactions (antagonistic and synergistic) observed for a 50% anticonvulsant effect (ED(50)) was also present for additional drug-dose effects tested, i.e. ED(16) and ED(84). The 3-D isobologram for the combination of OXC with CZP clearly visualized either synergy or antagonism between the drugs in combinations.Distinct differences resulting from two experimental methods prove evidently the superiority of isobolographic analysis over the subthreshold method. The former clearly and adequately detects the exact types of interactions between two AEDs, becoming a potent and powerful paradigm for further studies evaluating the character of interactions among AEDs.

Pharmacodynamic interaction studies with topiramate in the pentylenetetrazol and maximal electroshock seizure models

There is emerging evidence to support the efficacy of some antiepileptic drug (AED) combinations in refractory epilepsy. Definitive clinical studies are, however, difficult to perform. Experimental seizure models can be employed to identify potentially useful combinations for subsequent clinical evaluation. We have investigated the anticonvulsant effects of topiramate (TPM) in combination with 13 other AEDs in the pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) and maximal electroshock (MES) seizure models. Single drugs and combinations were administered by intraperitoneal injection and anticonvulsant effects determined at 1-hour post-dosing. TPM was without significant effect in the PTZ test. In contrast, phenobarbital, primidone, ethosuximide, sodium valproate, felbamate and tiagabine all increased the latency to the first generalised seizure. Combinations of TPM and active adjunctive drug were universally effective. Combinations of TPM with clobazam, lamotrigine and levetiracetam were also anticonvulsant, despite the inactivity of the constituent compounds when administered alone. TPM reduced the incidence of MES-induced seizures in a dose-dependent manner, as did phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, carbamazepine, sodium valproate, clobazam, lamotrigine, felbamate and tiagabine. All combination treatments were similarly effective. These findings suggest that combinations of TPM with lamotrigine and levetiracetam may demonstrate anticonvulsant synergism and merit further investigation in additional model systems and with recourse to more quantitative mathematical analysis.

Effect of topiramate on the anticonvulsant activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs in two models of experimental epilepsy

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the interaction of the novel antiepileptic drug (AED), topiramate (TPM), with conventional AEDs against amygdala-kindled seizures in rats and pentylenetetrazol-induced convulsions in mice.

METHODS

Experiments were performed on mice and fully kindled rats. In pentylenetetrazol test, the chemoconvulsant was used at its CD97 dose of 105 mg/kg, producing clonic seizures in 97% of mice. Adverse effects were evaluated with the chimney test and passive avoidance task. Plasma levels of AEDs were measured with immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

TPM at 20 mg/kg exerted a significant anticonvulsant effect as regards seizure and afterdischarge durations in amygdala-kindled seizures in rats, being ineffective at lower doses. Coadministration of TPM (10 mg/kg) with valproate (VPA; at a subtherapeutic dose of 50 mg/kg) resulted in essential reductions of seizure and afterdischarge durations. TPM (10 mg/kg) combined with carbamazepine (CBZ; at a subtherapeutic dose of 15 mg/kg) significantly increased afterdischarge threshold, simultaneously decreasing the remaining seizure parameters (duration or severity of seizures and afterdischarge duration). TPM (10 mg/kg) given with phenobarbital (PB; 15 mg/kg) markedly shortened seizure severity and seizure and afterdischarge durations. Combinations of TPM with diphenylhydantoin (PHT) were ineffective against kindled seizures in rats. TPM combined with VPA and PB did not alter their plasma levels, but its combination with CBZ resulted in an increased free plasma CBZ concentration. TPM (10 and 20 mg/kg) alone and its combinations with conventional AEDs affected neither motor coordination nor long-term memory, evaluated in the chimney and passive avoidance tests, respectively, in rats. In pentylenetetrazol-evoked convulsions in mice, TPM (175 and 200 mg/kg) showed anticonvulsant effects per se. Moreover, TPM (at its subtherapeutic dose of 150 mg/kg), significantly potentiated the anticonvulsant action of ethosuximide (ESM), but not that of VPA, PB, or clonazepam (CZP) against pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures. Either TPM alone (150 mg/kg) or its combination with ESM did not result in significant undesired effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The experimental data indicate that except for PHT, the combinations of TPM with conventional AEDs are beneficial against amygdala-kindled seizures in rats. In the pentylenetetrazol test, this novel AED potentiated only the protection offered by ESM.

Polytherapy in epilepsy: the experimental evidence

Monotherapy is recommended preferentially among newly diagnosed epileptic patients. In monotherapy-resistant patients polytherapy may be necessary. Two antiepileptic drugs may produce antagonistic, additive, and supra-additive (synergistic) anticonvulsant effects. The drug combination providing the supra-additive effect seems of clinical significance. However, when the supra-additive anticonvulsant efficacy is also associated by a distinct increase in toxicity, the protective index may be not affected or even lowered. Synergistic interactions have been shown for the combinations of valproate-phenytoin/ethosuximide, topiramate-carbamazepine/phenobarbital and felbamate-all major conventional antiepileptics. In contrast, the protective action of conventional antiepileptics has not been affected by felbamate at subprotective doses against maximal electroshock in mice. This is indicative that synergism is evident at only some drug ratios. Potential antiepileptic drugs, excitatory amino acid antagonists and calcium channel inhibitors, generally enhanced the protection offered by antiepileptic drugs. The experimental data may be helpful for predicting which drug combinations may prove effective in epileptic patients.

Interaction of topiramate with carbamazepine: two case reports and a review of clinical experience

We describe a possible clinical interaction between topiramate (TPM) and carbamazepine modified release (CBZ-MR) in patients taking maximum tolerated doses of carbamazepine. Data are presented on 25 patients who contacted the epilepsy nurse specialist telephone helpline for advice after starting treatment with TPM. Thirteen male and 12 female patients, mean age 41 years (range 25-69 years), with localization-related epilepsy contacted the helplines, between November 1999 and March 2001, complaining of symptoms of antiepileptic drug intoxication after starting treatment with TPM. All were taking maximum tolerated doses of CBZ-MR before starting TPM. Sixteen of the patients were taking other antiepileptic drugs concomitantly with CBZ-MR and TPM. Symptoms of intoxication were similar to those previously experienced when maximum tolerated doses of CBZ-MR were exceeded. Symptoms resolved when concomitant CBZ-MR doses were reduced, enabling further dose escalation of TPM. To our knowledge, neither clinical nor pharmacological interactions between CBZ and TPM have been described previously in man. These data suggest that such an interaction may be of clinical importance, and that reduction of the CBZ dose may enable optimization of the dose of TPM, improving seizure control.