Pharmacological analysis of contractile effects of eletriptan and sumatriptan on human isolated blood vessels

Migraine and the trigeminovascular system-40 years and counting

The underlying causes of migraine headache remained enigmatic for most of the 20th century. In 1979, The Lancet published a novel hypothesis proposing an integral role for the neuropeptide-containing trigeminal nerve. This hypothesis led to a transformation in the migraine field and understanding of key concepts surrounding migraine, including the role of neuropeptides and their release from meningeal trigeminal nerve endings in the mechanism of migraine, blockade of neuropeptide release by anti-migraine drugs, and activation and sensitisation of trigeminal afferents by meningeal inflammatory stimuli and upstream role of intense brain activity. The study of neuropeptides provided the first evidence that antisera directed against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P could neutralise their actions. Successful therapeutic strategies using humanised monoclonal antibodies directed against CGRP and its receptor followed from these findings. Nowadays, 40 years after the initial proposal, the trigeminovascular system is widely accepted as having a fundamental role in this highly complex neurological disorder and provides a road map for future migraine therapies.

Triptans and Chest Symptoms: The Role of Pulmonary Vasoconstriction

Triptans are effective and well tolerated in the treatment of acute migraine. Chest symptoms are a common adverse effect unrelated to coronary vasoconstriction in most patients. Although the aetiology of chest symptoms remains to be fully defined, pulmonary vasoconstriction is a possible underlying mechanism. Preclinical studies of isolated human blood vessels were used to identify the cerebral selectivity of triptans and ascertain if selectivity vs the pulmonary vasculature predicts a lower rate of chest symptoms. Controlled clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance studies were reviewed to document the incidence of chest symptoms after triptan therapy. In clinical trials, the incidence of chest symptoms at usual therapeutic doses ranged from 1 to 4% depending on the triptan and study design, whereas in post-marketing surveillance studies, up to 41% of patients specifically asked about chest symptoms reported them. A comparative clinical trial showed that almotriptan was associated with lower incidence of chest symptoms than sumatriptan (0.3 vs 2.2%). The intrinsic activity of almotriptan, a second-generation triptan, on human pulmonary arteries and veins was lower than that of sumatriptan. Pre-clinical studies of isolated pulmonary blood vessels may predict the clinical likelihood of chest symptoms; however, additional comparisons are needed.

Subcutaneous delivery of sumatriptan in the treatment of migraine and primary headache

Subcutaneous sumatriptan is an effective treatment for pain from acute migraine headache, and can be used in patients with known migraine syndrome and in patients with primary headaches when secondary causes have been excluded. In limited comparative trials, subcutaneous sumatriptan performed in a manner comparable with oral eletriptan and intravenous metoclopramide, was superior to intravenous aspirin and intramuscular trimethobenzamide-diphenhydramine, and was inferior to intravenous prochlorperazine for pain relief. The most common side effects seen with subcutaneous sumatriptan are injection site reactions and triptan sensations. As with all triptans, there is a risk of rare cardiovascular events with subcutaneous sumatriptan and its use should be limited to those without known cerebrovascular disease and limited in those with known cardiovascular risk factors and unknown disease status. In studies of patient preference and tolerability, the subcutaneous formulation has a faster time of onset and high rate of efficacy when compared with the oral formulation, but the oral formulation appears to be better tolerated. It is important to consider the needs of the patient, their past medical history, and what aspects of migraine treatment are most important to the patient when considering treatment of acute migraine or primary headache. Subcutaneous sumatriptan is a good first-line agent for the treatment of pain from acute migraine headaches and primary headaches.

The relevance of preclinical research models for the development of antimigraine drugs: focus on 5-HT(1B/1D) and CGRP receptors

Migraine is a complex neurovascular syndrome, causing a unilateral pulsating headache with accompanying symptoms. The past four decades have contributed immensely to our present understanding of migraine pathophysiology and have led to the introduction of specific antimigraine therapies, much to the relief of migraineurs. Pathophysiological factors culminating into migraine headaches have not yet been completely deciphered and, thus, pose an additional challenge for preclinical research in the absence of any direct experimental marker. Migraine provocation experiments in humans use a head-score to evaluate migraine, as articulated by the volunteer, which cannot be applied to laboratory animals. Therefore, basic research focuses on different symptoms and putative mechanisms, one at a time or in combination, to validate the hypotheses. Studies in several species, utilizing different preclinical approaches, have significantly contributed to the two antimigraine principles in therapeutics, namely: 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists (known as triptans) and CGRP receptor antagonists (known as gepants). This review will analyze the preclinical experimental models currently known for the development of these therapeutic principles, which are mainly based on the vascular and/or neurogenic theories of migraine pathogenesis. These include models based on the involvement of cranial vasodilatation and/or the trigeminovascular system in migraine. Clearly, the preclinical strategies should involve both approaches, while incorporating the newer ideas/techniques in order to get better insights into migraine pathophysiology.

Neurovascular pharmacology of migraine

Migraine is a paroxysmal neurovascular disorder, which affects a significant proportion of the population. Since dilation of cranial blood vessels is likely to be responsible for the headache experienced in migraine, many experimental models for the study of migraine have focussed on this feature. The current review discusses a model that is based on the constriction of carotid arteriovenous anastomoses in anaesthetized pigs, which has during the last decades proven of great value in identifying potential antimigraine drugs acting via a vascular mechanism. Further, the use of human isolated blood vessels in migraine research is discussed. Thirdly, we describe an integrated neurovascular model, where dural vasodilatation in response to trigeminal perivascular nerve stimulation can be studied. Such a model not only allows an in-depth characterization of directly vascularly acting drugs, but also of drugs that are supposed to act via inhibition of vasodilator responses to endogenous neuropeptides, or of drugs that inhibit the release of these neuropeptides. We discuss the use of this model in a study on the influence of female sex hormones on migraine. Finally, the implementation of this model in mice is considered. Such a murine model allows the use of genetically modified animals, which will lead to a better understanding of the ion channel mutations that are found in migraine patients.

The effect of maternal ketanserin treatment on foetal 5-HT receptor function in umbilical cord artery of pre-eclamptic patients

BACKGROUND

Maternal treatment with the 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist ketanserin (KT) in pre-eclamptic patients is associated with a high placental transmission of KT, resulting in pharmacologically active levels of KT in the umbilical cord artery (UCA) and the neonate. Prolonged exposure to a 5-HT receptor antagonist may influence the functionality of foetal 5-HT receptors and compromise foetal development.

OBJECTIVE

To study whether exposure to KT influences the characteristics of foetal 5-HT receptors, functional studies were performed on 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors in UCA from pre-eclamptic patients treated with KT.

METHODS

UCAs were obtained, immediately after delivery, from pre-eclamptic patients (n = 7), treated antenatally with intravenous KT. Pre-eclamptic patients (n = 13), not treated with KT (non-KT), were included as a control group. Segments of UCA were prepared and mounted in tissue baths and isometric force changes were determined. Cumulative concentration response curves to 5-HT and to the 5-HT(1B/1D )receptor agonist sumatriptan were constructed in the absence or presence of the 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist KT or the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist GR125743, respectively.

RESULTS

All UCA segments showed contractile responses to both 5-HT and sumatriptan, and the concentration response curves showed a rightward shift with increasing concentrations of KT and GR125743, respectively, indicating the presence of functional 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors in the foetal tissue. No significant differences were found in maximum response (E(max))(expressed in percent of response on 100 mM KCl) or potency (pEC(50)) of 5-HT in both groups (E(max) = 141 +/- 7.7%, pEC(50) = 7.67 +/- 0.26 in KT-treated group and E(max) = 162 +/- 12.6%, pEC(50) = 7.69 +/- 0.14 in non-KT treated group, respectively). No significant differences were found in the potency of the antagonist KT in both study groups (pK(b) = 7.65 +/- 0.31 in KT group and 7.46 +/- 0.17 in non-KT group, respectively). Similarly, with sumatriptan, no significant differences were found between KT-treated patients and non-KT treated patients (E(max) = 142 +/- 16.2 and 140 +/- 14.7%, respectively, pEC(50) = 6.17 +/- 0.37 and 6.41 +/- 0.28 respectively, pK(b) of GR125743 = 7.83 +/- 0.48 and 8.43 +/- 0.29, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Foetal exposure to KT in pre-eclamptic patients does not seem to influence the functional characteristics of 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors in the UCA.

Functional reactivity of 5-HT receptors in human umbilical cord and maternal subcutaneous fat arteries after normotensive or pre-eclamptic pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the functional reactivity of 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin; 5-HT) receptors in foetal umbilical cord arteries (UCA) and maternal subcutaneous fat resistance arteries (SFA) in normotensive and pre-eclamptic pregnancy.

DESIGN

Study groups were divided based on the presence or absence of pre-eclampsia and the duration of gestation.

METHODS

Segments of UCA and SFA were mounted in tissue baths and concentration-response curves to 5-HT and sumatriptan (5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist) were constructed in the absence or presence of ketanserin (5-HT2A receptor antagonist) or GR125743 (5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist).

RESULTS

Both 5-HT and sumatriptan contracted all UCA segments studied. The responses to 5-HT and the potency of ketanserin in UCA were not different between the study groups, indicating a similar profile of the 5-HT2A receptor. In contrast, the potencies of sumatriptan and GR125743 were significantly higher in normotensive full-term pregnancies than in normotensive pre-term pregnancies in UCA. The response to sumatriptan in UCA arteries was not significantly different between pre-eclamptic and normotensive pregnancies. However, the potency of both sumatriptan and GR125743 was positively correlated to the gestational age in the normotensive group, whereas this relationship was absent in the pre-eclamptic group. In SFA, responses to 5-HT and sumatriptan were not different between the pre-eclamptic patients and normotensive controls.

CONCLUSIONS

In both UCA and SFA, 5-HT1B/1D and 5-HT2A receptors mediate vasoconstriction. The sensitivity of 5-HT1B/1D receptors increases in the last trimester in the UCA in normal pregnancies, which seems to be expedited in pre-eclamptic patients. Further studies on 5-HT1B/ID receptors will thus give new insights into the foetal development and pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia.

5-Hydroxytryptamine receptors in the human cardiovascular system

The human cardiovascular system is exposed to plasma 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin), usually released from platelets. 5-HT can produce harmful acute and chronic effects. The acute cardiac effects of 5-HT consist of tachycardia (preceded on occasion by a brief reflex bradycardia), increased atrial contractility and production of atrial arrhythmias. Acute inotropic, lusitropic and arrhythmic effects of 5-HT on human ventricle become conspicuous after inhibition of phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity. Human cardiostimulation is mediated through 5-HT4 receptors. Atrial and ventricular PDE3 activity exerts a protective role against potentially harmful cardiostimulation. Chronic exposure to high levels of 5-HT (from metastatic carcinoid tumours), the anorectic drug fenfluramine and its metabolites, as well as the ecstasy drug 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and its metabolite 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) are associated with proliferative disease and thickening of cardiac valves, mediated through 5-HT2B receptors. 5-HT2B receptors have an obligatory physiological role in murine cardiac embryology but whether this happens in humans requires research. Congenital heart block (CHB) is, on occasion, associated with autoantibodies against 5-HT4 receptors. Acute vascular constriction by 5-HT is usually shared by 5-HT1B and 5-HT2A receptors, except in intracranial arteries which constrict only through 5-HT1B receptors. Both 5-HT1B and 5-HT2A receptors can mediate coronary artery spasm but only 5-HT1B receptors appear involved in coronary spasm of patients treated with triptans or with Prinzmetal angina. 5-HT2A receptors constrict the portal venous system including oesophageal collaterals in cirrhosis. Chronic exposure to 5-HT can contribute to pulmonary hypertension through activation of constrictor 5-HT1B receptors and proliferative 5-HT2B receptors, and possibly through direct intracellular effects.

Experimental migraine models and their relevance in migraine therapy

Although the understanding of migraine pathophysiology is incomplete, it is now well accepted that this neurovascular syndrome is mainly due to a cranial vasodilation with activation of the trigeminal system. Several experimental migraine models, based on vascular and neuronal involvement, have been developed. Obviously, the migraine models do not entail all facets of this clinically heterogeneous disorder, but their contribution at several levels (molecular, in vitro, in vivo) has been crucial in the development of novel antimigraine drugs and in the understanding of migraine pathophysiology. One important vascular in vivo model, based on an assumption that migraine headache involves cranial vasodilation, determines porcine arteriovenous anastomotic blood flow. Other models utilize electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion/nerve to study neurogenic dural inflammation, while the superior sagittal sinus stimulation model takes into account the transmission of trigeminal nociceptive input in the brainstem. More recently, the introduction of integrated models, namely electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion or systemic administration of capsaicin, allows studying the activation of the trigeminal system and its effect on the cranial vasculature. Studies using in vitro models have contributed enormously during the preclinical stage to characterizing the receptors in cranial blood vessels and to studying the effects of several putative antimigraine agents. The aforementioned migraine models have advantages as well as some limitations. The present review is devoted to discussing various migraine models and their relevance to antimigraine therapy.

Safety and Efficacy of Eletriptan in the Treatment of Acute Migraine

Eletriptan is a new selective serotonin agonist approved for the treatment of acute migraine headaches. To review the pharmacologic, pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, safety, and clinical efficacy data for eletriptan, we searched the literature in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and Science Direct databases to gather all published reports from January 1996-October 2004. All English-language reports (abstract or full trial reports) about the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of eletriptan were reviewed. Eletriptan's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters translate into a favorable safety and efficacy profile. The drug is rapidly absorbed when administered orally, has good bioavailability and central nervous system penetration due to its lipophilicity, and has a long half-life, which contributes to its ability to prevent recurrent headaches. Compared with other serotonin agonists, eletriptan has a longer duration of action and greater lipophilicity. Eletriptan is metabolized through the cytochrome P450 3A4 system; therefore, it does have the potential for clinically significant drug interactions. In clinical trials, eletriptan demonstrated efficacy superior to that of placebo and similar or superior efficacy to that of other serotonin agonists, with limited adverse effects. With clinical use, headache and pain-free responses and headache recurrence rates were similar to those of other serotonin agonists, but the agent is superior to ergotamine tartrate-caffeine. Based on pharmaco-economic data, eletriptan is more cost-effective than other agents in its class. Eletriptan is a safe and cost-effective option for the treatment of migraine headaches.

Triptans induce vasoconstriction of human arteries and veins from the thoracic wall

A common side effect of migraine treatment with triptans is chest symptoms. The origin of these symptoms is not known. The aim of the present study was to examine the vasocontractile effect of triptans in human arteries and veins from the thoracic wall and in coronary artery bypass grafts. In vitro pharmacology experiments showed that the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) type 1B and 1D receptor agonists, eletriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan, induced vasoconstriction in the thoracic blood vessels from 38% to 57% of the patients. 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT) and sumatriptan elicited a vasoconstriction that was antagonized by the 5-HT1B receptor antagonist SB224289, whereas the 5-HT1D receptor antagonist BRL115572 had no effect. 5-HT induced a contraction that was inhibited by the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist ketanserin. 5-HT2A, 5-HT1B, and 5-HT1D receptor mRNA levels were detected by real-time PCR in all blood vessels studied. In conclusion, triptans induce vasoconstriction in arteries and veins from the thoracic wall, most likely by activation of 5-HT1B receptors. This response could be observed in only 38% to 57% of the patients, which may provide an explanation for why a similar number of patients experience chest symptoms as a side effect of migraine treatment with triptans.

Evaluating the safety and tolerability profile of acute treatments for migraine

Among the medications that have been used as acute treatments for migraine are nonspecific agents, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), analgesics (either single or combination), and narcotics, as well as migraine-specific medications, including ergot alkaloids and triptans (5-hydroxytryptamine 1B/1D agonists). All of these drugs have side effects that vary in type and severity. Side effects of nonspecific medications, including gastrointestinal (GI) and renal effects with NSAIDs and cognitive effects and the potential for abuse with narcotics and butalbital-containing medications, have been documented over time, as these medications have been used for various indications. Side effects of the migraine-specific medications include GI and vascular symptoms with the ergots; for the triptans, they include chest and neurologic symptoms. Although adverse events are reported fairly frequently in patients receiving triptans, they are usually mild, and few patients discontinue therapy because of them. The most serious adverse events are cardiovascular. Because of potential vasoconstrictor effects--mild and transient increases in blood pressure and mild and transient effects on coronary artery tone--triptans as a class are contraindicated in patients with established or clinically suspected cardiovascular disease, specifically ischemic heart disease and uncontrolled hypertension. Other adverse events, including the potential for drug-drug interactions, are less common. Therefore, consideration should be given to the tolerability and safety of medications before their use as abortive medications for the treatment of migraine headache.

Coronary vasoconstrictor potential of triptans: a review of in vitro pharmacologic data

This article reviews the in vitro pharmacology of the triptans in human isolated coronary arteries. As expected, based on their similar pharmacologic profiles, the triptans cannot be easily differentiated with respect to effects at human isolated coronary arteries. Furthermore, the data show that at therapeutically relevant concentrations, triptans have little potential to cause clinically significant constriction of nondiseased coronary arteries. These data, considered in the context of clinical findings reviewed elsewhere in this supplement, support the conclusion that, while all triptans have the potential to produce small contractions of human isolated coronary arteries, their craniovascular selectivity, when used at therapeutic doses, renders them unlikely to cause serious adverse coronary events in patients with healthy coronary arteries.

Consensus Statement: Cardiovascular Safety Profile of Triptans (5-HT1B/1D Agonists) in the Acute Treatment of Migraine

BACKGROUND

Health care providers frequently cite concerns about cardiovascular safety of the triptans as a barrier to their use. In 2002, the American Headache Society convened the Triptan Cardiovascular Safety Expert Panel to evaluate the evidence on triptan-associated cardiovascular risk and to formulate consensus recommendations for making informed decisions for their use in patients with migraine.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the evidence reviewed by the Triptan Cardiovascular Safety Expert Panel and their recommendations for the use of triptans in clinical practice.

PARTICIPANTS

The Triptan Cardiovascular Safety Expert Panel was composed of a multidisciplinary group of experts in neurology, primary care, cardiology, pharmacology, women's health, and epidemiology.

EVIDENCE AND CONSENSUS PROCESS

An exhaustive search of the relevant published literature was reviewed by each panel member in preparation for an open roundtable meeting. Pertinent issues (eg, cardiovascular pharmacology of triptans, epidemiology of cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk assessment, migraine) were presented as a prelude to group discussion and formulation of consensus conclusions and recommendations. Follow-up meetings were held by telephone.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Most of the data on triptans are derived from patients without known coronary artery disease. (2) Chest symptoms occurring during use of triptans are generally nonserious and are not explained by ischemia. (3) The incidence of serious cardiovascular events with triptans in both clinical trials and clinical practice appears to be extremely low. (4) The cardiovascular risk-benefit profile of triptans favors their use in the absence of contraindications.

Tolerability of the triptans: clinical implications

The triptans represent a relatively new class of compounds effective in the treatment of migraine. The safety and tolerability of these drugs have been extensively investigated since the first triptan (sumatriptan) became commercially available. A report on a very large population of patients tested during clinical trials and in postmarketing studies, confirms that these drugs are safe and well tolerated when correctly used. Adverse events are frequently reported, but are usually mild and only a few patients discontinue therapy because of them. These adverse events include, in particular, the so-called 'triptan symptoms' (tingling, sensation of warmth, etc.). The exact mechanism of chest symptoms reported by 20% of patients with migraine treated with triptans remains unclear, but are exceptionally related to a cardiac mechanism. CNS adverse events (i.e. somnolence) are also reported, but it is a matter of debate whether they are related to the pharmacological properties (i.e. lipophilicity) of the drug or are symptoms of the disease itself. The potential risk for drug overuse must be taken into account when the triptans are given to patients with a high frequency of migraine attacks. Clinical interaction of triptans with other drugs metabolised in the liver may theoretically influence the incidence of adverse events, but there is little evidence to support this assumption. There is no evidence of a teratogenic risk of triptans in pregnant women taking these drugs.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oral eletriptan for treatment of acute migraine: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy, consistency, safety, and tolerability of oral eletriptan in the acute treatment of three migraine attacks.

BACKGROUND

Eletriptan is a selective 5-HT1B/1D agonist member of a class of agents known to be effective in the acute treatment of migraine.

METHODS

Thirteen hundred thirty-four patients were randomized to 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg of eletriptan, or placebo and could treat up to three attacks. The primary efficacy endpoint was 2-hour headache response for the first attack. Secondary endpoints included associated symptom relief, and pain-free, sustained pain-free, and consistency of response.

RESULTS

Eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg achieved significantly (P <.0001) better headache response rates than placebo at 2 hours (47%, 62%, and 59%, respectively, versus 22%) and 4 hours (64%, 76%, and 79%, respectively, versus 25%). Headache response was observed to be rapid, showing improvement at 0.5 hour and 1 hour. Two-hour pain-free response rates for eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg were 14%, 27%, and 27%, respectively, compared with 4% for placebo. Sustained pain-free response rates were significantly (P <.001) better for eletriptan 20 mg (10%), 40 mg (20%), and 80 mg (18%) compared with placebo (3%). Eletriptan had a higher consistency of intrapatient response than placebo in two of three (68% to 82%) and three of three attacks (32% to 60%) versus 16% and 8%, respectively. All eletriptan doses yielded significant functional improvement at 2 hours. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate and transient, with eletriptan 20 mg having an adverse event profile comparable to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Eletriptan is efficacious, displaying high consistency of response over multiple attacks, and is well tolerated for the acute treatment of migraine.

Migraine aggravation caused by cephalic venous congestion

BACKGROUND

Cerebral venous distension is thought by some to serve as a source of migraine pain. Previous investigators have tried to modify pain intensity by induction of additional venous congestion via compression of both internal jugular veins (Queckenstedt's maneuver). The magnitude of blood flow within the internal jugular veins depends markedly on body position, and inconsistencies in positioning may have influenced their results.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of Queckenstedt's maneuver, performed both in the upright and in the supine body position, in migraineurs during an acute attack.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients (18 women, 7 men; mean age +/- SD, 35.4 +/- 13.3 years) with International Headache Society-defined migraine without aura were evaluated. Queckenstedt's maneuver was performed in both body positions during an acute migraine attack, involving constant application of manual pressure to both internal jugular veins for 30 seconds. Headache intensity was rated before, during, and after Queckenstedt's maneuver on a scale extending from 1 (mild) to 10 (intolerable).

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (68%) reported an increase of headache intensity in the supine position during Queckenstedt's maneuver. In the sitting position, pain increase was observed only in 6 patients (24%). The magnitude of pain increase was significantly greater in the supine position compared to the upright position (P=.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support a role for cerebral venous congestion in the generation of migraine pain and suggest body position may influence the clinical expression of that process.

Molecular Mechanisms of Migraine

Migraine is a common complex disorder that affects a large portion of the population and thus incurs a substantial economic burden on society. The disorder is characterized by recurrent headaches that are unilateral and usually accompanied by nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. The range of clinical characteristics is broad and there is evidence of comorbidity with other neurological diseases, complicating both the diagnosis and management of the disorder. Although the class of drugs known as the triptans (serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists) has been shown to be effective in treating a significant number of patients with migraine, treatment may in the future be further enhanced by identifying drugs that selectively target molecular mechanisms causing susceptibility to the disease.Genetically, migraine is a complex familial disorder in which the severity and susceptibility of individuals is most likely governed by several genes that may be different among families. Identification of the genomic variants involved in genetic predisposition to migraine should facilitate the development of more effective diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Genetic profiling, combined with our knowledge of therapeutic response to drugs, should enable the development of specific, individually-tailored treatment.

Comparison of contractile responses to donitriptan and sumatriptan in the human middle meningeal and coronary arteries

Donitriptan is a potent, high efficacy agonist at 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors. We investigated the contractile effects of donitriptan and sumatriptan on human isolated blood vessels of relevance to therapeutic efficacy in migraine (middle meningeal artery) and coronary adverse events (coronary artery). Furthermore, using the concentration-response curves in the middle meningeal artery, we predicted the plasma concentration needed for the therapeutic effect of donitriptan. Both donitriptan and sumatriptan contracted the middle meningeal artery with similar apparent efficacy (E(max): 103+/-8% and 110+/-12%, respectively), but the potency of donitriptan (pEC(50): 9.07+/-0.14) was significantly higher than that of sumatriptan (pEC(50): 7.41+/-0.08). In the coronary artery, the contraction to donitriptan was biphasic with a significantly higher maximal response (E(max): 29+/-6%) than sumatriptan (E(max): 14+/-2%; pEC(50): 5.71+/-0.16), yielding two distinct pEC(50) values (8.25+/-0.16 and 5.60+/-0.24). Incubation with the 5-HT(2) receptor antagonist ketanserin (10 microM) eliminated the low affinity component of the concentration-response curve of donitriptan and the resultant E(max) and pEC(50) were 9+/-2% and 7.33+/-0.21, respectively. Ketanserin was without effect on the sumatriptan-induced contraction. Based on the middle meningeal artery contraction, concentrations (C(max)) of donitriptan that may be expected to have a therapeutic efficacy equivalent to that of 50 and 100 mg sumatriptan are predicted to be around 2.5 and 4.3 nM, respectively. Such concentrations are likely to induce only a small coronary artery contraction of 2.9+/-1.5% and 3.8+/-2.0%, respectively; these are not different from those by C(max) concentrations of sumatriptan (1.7+/-0.4% or 2.2+/-0.4%). The present results suggest that, like sumatriptan, donitriptan exhibits cranioselectivity and would be effective in aborting migraine attacks with a similar coronary side-effect profile as sumatriptan.

Characterization of sumatriptan-induced contractions in human isolated blood vessels using selective 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptor antagonists and in situ hybridization

The 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist sumatriptan is effective in aborting acute attacks of migraine and is known to cause constriction of cranial arteries as well as some peripheral blood vessels. The present study set out to investigate whether 5-HT(1B) and/or 5-HT(1D) receptors mediate contractions of the human isolated middle meningeal and temporal arteries (models for anti-migraine efficacy) and coronary artery and saphenous vein (models for side-effect potential). Concentration-response curves were made with sumatriptan (1 nm-100 microm) in blood vessels in the absence or presence of selective antagonists at 5-HT(1B) (SB224289) and 5-HT(1D) (BRL15572) receptors. SB224289 antagonized sumatriptan-induced contractions in all blood vessels, although the antagonism profile was different amongst these blood vessels. In the temporal artery, SB224289 abolished contraction to sumatriptan, whereas in the middle meningeal artery and saphenous vein sumatriptan-induced contractions were blocked in an insurmountable fashion. Moreover, SB224289 acted as a weak surmountable antagonist in the coronary artery (pK(B): 6.4 +/- 0.2). In contrast, BRL15572 had little or no effect on sumatriptan-induced contractions in the four blood vessels investigated. In situ hybridization revealed the expression of 5-HT(1B) receptor mRNA in the smooth muscle as well as endothelial cells of the blood vessels, whereas the mRNA for the 5-HT(1D) receptor was only very weakly expressed. These results show that the 5-HT(1B) receptor is primarily involved in sumatriptan-induced contractions of human cranial as well as peripheral blood vessels.

Effects of donitriptan on carotid haemodynamics and cardiac output distribution in anaesthetized pigs

We investigated the effects of donitriptan, which possesses a uniquely high affinity and efficacy at 5-HT1B/1D receptors, on carotid and systemic haemodynamics in anaes thetized pigs. Donitriptan (0.16-100 microg kg(-1), i.v.) dose-dependently decreased total carotid blood flow and vascular conductance (maximum response: -25 +/- 3%). This effect was entirely due to a selective reduction in the cephalic arteriovenous anastomotic fraction (maximum response: - 63 +/- 3%; ED50%: 92 +/- 31 nmol/kg); the nutrient vascular conductance increased. Donitriptan did not decrease vascular conductances in or blood flow to a number of organs, including the heart and kidneys; in fact, vascular conductances in the skin, brain and skeletal muscles increased. Cardiac output was slightly decreased by donitriptan, but this effect was confined to peripheral arteriovenous anastomoses. The haemodynamic effects of donitriptan were substantially reduced by the 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR127935. These results show that donitriptan selectively constricts arteriovenous anastomoses via 5-HT1B receptor activation. The drug should be able to abort migraine headaches and it is unlikely to compromize blood flow to vital organs.

Vascular effects of the new anti-migraine agent almotriptan on human cranial and peripheral arteries

This paper describes the vascular effects of almotriptan in comparison with sumatriptan in human vessels and tissues in vitro. The contractile properties of almotriptan and sumatriptan were evaluated in vitro in the following arteries: meningeal, temporal, basilar, internal carotid, ophthalmic, pulmonary and coronary. In addition, the effects of almotriptan on the pulmonary vein and on bronchial tissues were studied. Almotriptan showed selectivity of action for migraine-related arteries (i.e. contractile EC(50) of 30 and 700 nm for meningeal and temporal arteries, respectively), whereas the effect on arteries supplying blood to the brain was lower. The contractile effect of almotriptan was lower than that of sumatriptan in pulmonary arteries, whereas in bronchial preparations no clinically relevant contractile responses were observed for either almotriptan or sumatriptan. In ophthalmic arteries the contractile effects of almotriptan and sumatriptan were similar, whereas lower contractile effects were obtained with almotriptan than with sumatriptan in coronary arteries.

Modifications by sumatriptan and acetylcholine of nitric oxide-mediated neurogenic dilatation in dog cerebral arteries

Canine cerebral arterial strips denuded of endothelium responded to nicotine and transmural electrical stimulation with relaxations, which were abolished by NG-nitro-L-arginine and methylene blue. Magnitudes of relaxation did not differ in the arteries contracted with prostaglandin F2alpha and sumatriptan, an effective therapeutic of migraine. Sumatriptan concentration-dependently contracted the arteries responding to 2 Hz stimulation with persistent relaxations, and the concentration of this 5-HT1B/1D/1F receptor agonist to overcome the relaxation averaged 1.06 x 10(-7) M. Acetylcholine inhibited the response to nerve stimulation due possibly to its action on prejunctional nitroxidergic nerves; the inhibition did not differ in the arteries contracted with prostaglandin F2alpha and K+. It appears that sumatriptan does not interfere with the release of nitric oxide from nerves but counteracts the neurogenic relaxation by functional antagonistic action on smooth muscle. Prejunctional inhibition by muscarinic receptor activation is unlikely associated with opening of neuronal K+ channels.