Possible involvement of tachykinin NK(1) and NMDA receptors in histamine-induced hyperalgesia in mice

Contribution of Histamine to Nociceptive Behaviors Induced by Intrathecally Administered Cholecystokinin-8

The involvement of spinal release of histamine in the nociceptive behaviors induced by cholecystokinin-8 (CCK-8) was investigated in mice. Intrathecal (i.t.) injection of CCK-8 elicited the nociceptive behaviors consisting of biting and licking. The nociceptive behaviors induced by i.t. treatment with CCK-8 showed two bell-shaped patterns. The histamine H₃ receptor antagonist significantly promoted the nociceptive behaviors induced by CCK-8 at doses of 1–100 fmol and 100 pmol. The nociceptive behaviors elicited by CCK-8 was inhibited by i.t. administration of the CCK-B receptor antagonist in a dose-dependent manner, but not by the CCK-A receptor antagonist. The nociceptive behaviors induced by CCK-8 were markedly suppressed by i.t. pretreatment with antiserum against histamine and were abolished in histidine decarboxylase-deleted gene mice. In histamine H₁ receptor-deleted gene mice, the nociceptive behaviors induced at both 10 amol and 10 pmol of CCK-8 were not affected. The tachykinin neurokinin-1 (NK₁) receptor antagonists inhibited CCK-8 (10 pmol)-induced nociceptive behaviors in a dose-dependent manner. CCK-8 (10 amol)-induced nociceptive behaviors was not antagonized by co-administration with the tachykinin NK₁ receptor antagonists. The nociceptive behaviors elicited by CCK-8 were inhibited by i.t. administration of the antagonist for the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in a dose-dependent manner. Our results suggest that the nociceptive behaviors induced by i.t. administration of CCK-8 (10 pmol) are mediated through the spinal release of histamine and are elicited via activation of the tachykinin NK₁ and NMDA receptors, whereas the nociceptive behaviors induced by i.t. administration of CCK-8 (10 amol) are mediated through the spinal release of histamine and elicited via NMDA receptor activation.

Exogenous serotonin regulates colorectal motility via the 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptors in the spinal cord of rats

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that intrathecal injection of noradrenaline or dopamine causes enhancement of colorectal motility. As these monoamines are neurotransmitters of descending pain inhibitory pathways in the spinal cord, we hypothesized that serotonin, which is one of the neurotransmitters involved in descending pain inhibition, also influences the lumbosacral defecation center. Therefore, we examined whether serotonin acting on the spinal defecation center enhances colorectal motility.

METHODS

Colorectal intraluminal pressure and propelled liquid volume were recorded in vivo in anesthetized rats.

KEY RESULTS

Intrathecal injection of serotonin into the L6-S1 spinal cord elicited periodic increases in colorectal intraluminal pressure, being associated with increases in liquid output. Pharmacological experiments revealed that the effect of serotonin is mediated by both 5-HT₂ and 5-HT₃ receptors. The serotonin-induced enhancement of colorectal motility was unaffected even after disconnection of the defecation center from supraspinal regions by cutting the T8 spinal cord, while transection of the parasympathetic pelvic nerves prevented the colokinetic effect of serotonin. Finally, we investigated interactions among serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine. Simultaneous administration of sub-effective doses of these monoamine neurotransmitters into the spinal cord caused propulsive colorectal motility slightly but substantially.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

These results demonstrate that exogenous serotonin acts on 5-HT₂ and 5-HT₃ receptors in the lumbosacral defecation center and activates the parasympathetic nervous system to enhance colorectal motility in cooperation with noradrenaline and dopamine.

Antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory and smooth muscle relaxant activities of the pyrrolo[3,4-d]pyridazinone derivatives: Possible mechanisms of action

The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic as well as anti-inflammatory activities of the new pyrrolo[3,4-d]pyridazinone derivatives. Moreover, the present study attempted to assess some of the mechanisms involved in the pharmacological activity of these compounds. In the previous studies it was shown that these compounds were highly active in the phenylbenzoquinone-induced 'writhing syndrome' test and had much lower activity in the hot plate, which indicates that mainly peripheral mechanisms of analgesia are involved in their effects. In these extended studies the analgesic activity of two tested compounds (4c, 4f) was confirmed in some animal models of pain. The studied compounds showed a significant and dose-related antinociceptive effect in the models of pain induced by formalin, capsaicin and glutamic acid. Both compounds decreased the edema formation and one of them (4c) attenuated mechanical hyperalgesia in carrageenan-induced paw inflammation in rats. Furthermore, both compounds inhibited cell migration, plasma exudation and nociceptive reaction in zymosan A-induced mouse peritonitis. In the subsequent studies, including experiments on isolated organs (ileum, trachea, aorta), radioligand assays and biochemical tests, it was demonstrated that analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of the investigated structures are largely due to their competitive antagonism for histamine H1 receptor. The influence on the level of cAMP in inflammatory cells (shown in RAW 264.7 macrophages) and subsequent inhibition of cytokine (TNFα, IL-1β) release can also be one of the important mechanisms of their action. Moreover some additional mechanisms may also be involved in the eventual analgesic effect of tested pyrrolo[3,4-d]pyridazinone derivatives.

Central nervous system mast cells in peripheral inflammatory nociception

BACKGROUND

Functional aspects of mast cell-neuronal interactions remain poorly understood. Mast cell activation and degranulation can result in the release of powerful pro-inflammatory mediators such as histamine and cytokines. Cerebral dural mast cells have been proposed to modulate meningeal nociceptor activity and be involved in migraine pathophysiology. Little is known about the functional role of spinal cord dural mast cells. In this study, we examine their potential involvement in nociception and synaptic plasticity in superficial spinal dorsal horn. Changes of lower spinal cord dura mast cells and their contribution to hyperalgesia are examined in animal models of peripheral neurogenic and non-neurogenic inflammation.

RESULTS

Spinal application of supernatant from activated cultured mast cells induces significant mechanical hyperalgesia and long-term potentiation (LTP) at spinal synapses of C-fibers. Lumbar, thoracic and thalamic preparations are then examined for mast cell number and degranulation status after intraplantar capsaicin and carrageenan. Intradermal capsaicin induces a significant percent increase of lumbar dural mast cells at 3 hours post-administration. Peripheral carrageenan in female rats significantly increases mast cell density in the lumbar dura, but not in thoracic dura or thalamus. Intrathecal administration of the mast cell stabilizer sodium cromoglycate or the spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) inhibitor BAY-613606 reduce the increased percent degranulation and degranulated cell density of lumbar dural mast cells after capsaicin and carrageenan respectively, without affecting hyperalgesia.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that lumbar dural mast cells may be sufficient but are not necessary for capsaicin or carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia.

Proteomic analysis uncovers novel actions of the neurosecretory protein VGF in nociceptive processing

Peripheral tissue injury is associated with changes in protein expression in sensory neurons that may contribute to abnormal nociceptive processing. We used cultured dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons as a model of axotomized neurons to investigate early changes in protein expression after nerve injury. Comparing protein levels immediately after DRG dissociation and 24 h later by proteomic differential expression analysis, we found a substantial increase in the levels of the neurotrophin-inducible protein VGF (nonacronymic), a putative neuropeptide precursor. In a rodent model of nerve injury, VGF levels were increased within 24 h in both injured and uninjured DRG neurons, and the increase persisted for at least 7 d. VGF was also upregulated 24 h after hindpaw inflammation. To determine whether peptides derived from proteolytic processing of VGF participate in nociceptive signaling, we examined the spinal effects of AQEE-30 and LQEQ-19, potential proteolytic products shown previously to be bioactive. Each peptide evoked dose-dependent thermal hyperalgesia that required activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase p38. In addition, LQEQ-19 induced p38 phosphorylation in spinal microglia when injected intrathecally and in the BV-2 microglial cell line when applied in vitro. In summary, our results demonstrate rapid upregulation of VGF in sensory neurons after nerve injury and inflammation and activation of microglial p38 by VGF peptides. Therefore, VGF peptides released from sensory neurons may participate in activation of spinal microglia after peripheral tissue injury.

Involvement of NMDA receptor in nociceptive effects elicited by intrathecal [Tyr6] gamma2-MSH(6-12), and the interaction with nociceptin/orphanin FQ in pain modulation in mice

The mas-related genes (Mrgs, also known as sensory neuron-specific receptors, SNSRs) are specifically expressed in small diameter sensory neurons in the trigeminal and dorsal root ganglia, suggesting an important role of the receptors in pain transmission. The present study aimed to investigate the underlying mechanism of the nociceptive effects after activation of MrgC, and the interaction between MrgC and N/OFQ-NOP receptor system in modulation of nociception in mice. Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of [Tyr(6)] gamma2-MSH(6-12), the most potent agonist for MrgC receptor, produced a significant hyperalgesic response as assayed by tail withdrawal test and a series of characteristic nociceptive responses, including biting, licking and scratching, in a dose-dependent manner (0.01-10 pmol and 0.01-10 nmol, respectively) in mice. These pronociceptive effects induced by [Tyr(6)] gamma2-MSH(6-12) were inhibited dose-dependently by co-injection of competitive NMDA receptor antagonist D-APV, non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801, and nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor L-NAME. However, the tachykinin NK(1) receptor antagonist L-703,606, and tachykinin NK(2) receptor antagonist MEN-10,376, had no influence on pronociceptive effects elicited by [Tyr(6)] gamma2-MSH(6-12). In other groups, [Tyr(6)] gamma2-MSH(6-12)-induced nociceptive responses were bidirectionally regulated by the co-injection of N/OFQ. N/OFQ inhibited nociceptive responses at high doses (0.01-1 nmol), but potentiated the behaviors at low doses (1 fmol-3 pmol). Furthermore, both hyperalgesia and nociceptive responses were enhanced after the co-administration with NOP receptor antagonist [Nphe(1)]N/OFQ(1-13)-NH(2). These results suggest that intrathecal [Tyr(6)] gamma2-MSH(6-12)-induced pronociceptive effects may be mediated through NMDA receptor-NO system in the spinal cord, and demonstrate the interaction between MrgC and N/OFQ-NOP receptor system in pain transmission.

Effects of mepyramine and famotidine on the physostigmine-induced antinociception in the formalin test in rats

In this study, the effects of mepyramine (H1-receptor antagonist), famotidine (H2-receptor antagonist), physostigmine (a cholinesterase inhibitor) and atropine (muscarinic-receptor antagonist) have investigated on the formalin-induced nociception in rats. The effects of mepyramine and famotidine have also examined on nociceptive changes induced by physostigmine and atropine. Nociception was induced by intraplantar injection of formalin (50 microL, 1%) into the right hind paw and the time spent licking and biting of the injected paw, was taken as a measure of pain. Formalin induced a marked biphasic (first phase: 0-5 min and second phase: 15-45 min) pain response. The used drugs did not change the first phase of formalin-induced pain. Subcutaneous injection of physostigmine significantly (p<0.05) suppressed pain. Subcutaneous injection of atropine alone did not change the intensity of pain, but pretreatment with atropine significantly (p<0.05) prevented physostigmine-induced antinociception. Intraperitoneal injections of mepyramine and famotidine significantly (p<0.05) decreased pain response. Mepyramine did not significantly change, but famotidine significantly (p<0.05) prevented analgesic effect of physostigmine on pain. Atropine did not inhibit the antinociceptive effects of both mepyramine and famotidine on formalin-induced nociception. These results indicate that physostigmine through muscarinic cholinergic receptors suppresses the pain induced by formalin. Both H1 and H2 receptor antagonists produce antinociception. Histamine H2, but no H1 antagonists may be involved in physostigmine-induced antinociception.

Modification of formalin-induced nociception by different histamine receptor agonists and antagonists

The present study evaluated the effects of different histamine receptor agonists and antagonists on the nociceptive response in the mouse formalin test. Intracerebroventricular (20-40 microg/mouse i.c.v.) or subcutaneous (1-10 mg/kg s.c.) injection of HTMT (H(1) receptor agonist) elicited a dose-related hyperalgesia in the early and late phases. Conversely, intraperitoneal (20 and 30 mg/kg i.p.) injection of dexchlorpheniramine (H(1) receptor antagonist) was antinociceptive in both phases. At a dose ineffective per se, dexchlorpheniramine (10 mg/kg i.p.) antagonized the hyperalgesia induced by HTMT (40 mug/mouse i.c.v. or 10 mg/kg s.c.). Dimaprit (H(2) receptor agonist, 30 mg/kg i.p.) and ranitidine (H(2) receptor antagonist, 20 and 40 mg/kg i.p.) reduced the nociceptive responses in the early and late phases. No significant change in the antinociceptive activity was found following the combination of dimaprit (30 mg/kg i.p.) with ranitidine (10 mg/kg i.p.). The antinociceptive effect of dimaprit (30 mg/kg i.p.) was prevented by naloxone (5 mg/kg i.p.) in the early phase or by imetit (H(3) receptor agonist, 25 mg/kg i.p.) in both early and late phases. The histamine H(3) receptor agonist imetit was hyperalgesic following i.p. administration of 50 mg/kg. Imetit-induced hyperalgesia was completely prevented by treatment with a dose ineffective per se of thioperamide (H(3) receptor antagonist, 5 mg/kg i.p.). The results suggest that histamine H(1) and H(3) receptor activations increase sensitivity to nociceptive stimulus in the formalin test.

Enhanced antinociceptive effects of morphine in histamine H2 receptor gene knockout mice

We have previously shown that antinociceptive effects of morphine are enhanced in histamine H1 receptor gene knockout mice. In the present study, involvement of supraspinal histamine H2 receptor in antinociception by morphine was examined using histamine H2 receptor gene knockout (H2KO) mice and histamine H2 receptor antagonists. Antinociception was evaluated by assays for thermal (hot-plate, tail-flick and paw-withdrawal tests), mechanical (tail-pressure test) and chemical (formalin and capsaicin tests) stimuli. Thresholds for pain perception in H2KO mice were higher than wild-type mice. Antinociceptive effects of intracerebroventricularly administered morphine were enhanced in the H2KO mice compared to wild-type mice. Intracerebroventricular co-administration of morphine and cimetidine produced significant antinociceptive effects in the wild-type mice when compared to morphine or cimetidine alone. Furthermore, zolantidine, a selective and hydrophobic H2 receptor antagonist, enhanced the effects of morphine in all nociceptive assays examined. These results suggest that histamine exerts inhibitory effects on morphine-induced antinociception through H2 receptors at the supraspinal level. Our present and previous studies suggest that H1 and H2 receptors cooperatively function to modulate pain perception in the central nervous system.

Enhanced antinociception by intracerebroventricularly administered orexin A in histamine H1 or H2 receptor gene knockout mice

Orexins are neuropeptides that are mostly expressed in the posterior and lateral hypothalamus, and related to the central control of appetite, arousal, and antinociception. Orexin neurons projected to the tuberomammillary nucleus and orexins may release histamine from the histamine neurons in this nucleus. Histamine is known to cause hypernociception. The roles of histamine H1 and H2 receptors in the orexin A-induced antinociception, however, have not been clarified yet. Here we studied the effects of histamine H1 and H2 receptors on orexin A-produced antinociception using histamine receptor knockout mice in four assays of nociception; the hot-plate, the tail-flick, the tail-pressure and the capsaicin tests. Furthermore we studied effects of histamine H1 and H2 receptor antagonists on orexin A-produced antinociception in C57BL/6 mice. The antinociceptive effects of i.c.v. orexin A were greater in histamine H1 receptor or H2 receptor knockout mice than in the wild-type mice in all four assays of pain. Furthermore, treatment of C57BL/6 mice with a combination of i.c.v. orexin A and d-chlorpheniramine (a histamine H1 receptor antagonist) or cimetidine (a histamine H2 receptor antagonist) showed a greater antinociception than i.c.v. orexin A alone in all four assays. These findings suggest the possibility that orexin A may activate H1 and H2 receptors in the supraspinal levels through the release of histamine from neurons, which might attenuate the antinociceptive effects of orexin A. Thus, the blocking of the histamine H1 or H2 receptor may produce antinociception and enhance the orexin A-induced antinociception.

Intrathecally-administered histamine facilitates nociception through tachykinin NK1 and histamine H1 receptors: A study in histidine decarboxylase gene knockout mice

Intrathecal injection of histamine elicited behavioral responses consisting of scratching, biting and licking in conscious mice. To study the participation of histamine in pain perception, histidine decarboxylase knockout mice were examined for pain threshold by means of three different kinds of noxious stimuli: thermal nociception (hot-plate, tail-flick, and paw-withdrawal), mechanical nociception (tail-pressure), and chemical nociception (formalin test and capsaicin test). Mutant mice lacking histidine decarboxylase showed significantly fewer nociceptive responses to the hot-plate, tail-flick, paw-withdrawal, tail-pressure, formalin and capsaicin tests. Sensitivity to noxious stimuli in the histidine decarboxylase knockout mice was significantly lower when compared to the wild-type mice. The intrathecally-administered histamine (400 pmol) significantly shortened the latency in the histidine decarboxylase knockout mice, but not in the wild-type mice in tail-flick tests. Pyrilamine, a histamine H(1) receptor antagonist, but not ranitidine, a histamine H(2) receptor antagonist, produced inhibition of the induced behavioral responses in the tail-flick test when co-administered with histamine. Sendide, a tachykinin NK(1) receptor antagonist, inhibited histamine-induced nociceptive behavior in the histidine decarboxylase knockout mice. In contrast, the treatment with D-(-)-2 amino-5-phosponovaleric acid (D-APV), an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, did not prevent the induction of the behavioral responses by histamine. These studies substantiate the evidence that nociceptive behavior induced by intrathecal injection of histamine is largely mediated through tachykinin NK(1) and histamine H(1) receptors in the spinal cord.

Involvement of the histaminergic system in the nociceptin-induced pain-related behaviors in the mouse spinal cord

Intrathecal (i.t.) injection of nociceptin elicited a behavioral response mainly consisting of biting and licking, which were eliminated by the i.t. co-administration of opioid receptor-like-1 (ORL-1) receptor antagonists. The behavioral response induced by nociceptin was characteristically similar to that by i.t.-administered histamine, and was attenuated by i.t. co-administration of the H1 receptor antagonists, but not by the H2 receptor antagonists, whereas the H3 receptor antagonist promoted the nociceptin-induced behavior. H1 receptor knockout (H1R-KO) mice did not show the nociceptin-induced nociceptive behavior, which was observed in wild-type mice. Pretreatment with a histamine antiserum or a histidine decarboxylase inhibitor resulted in a significant reduction of the response to nociceptin. The previous studies showed that NK1 receptor antagonists and a novel substance P (SP)-specific antagonist given i.t. could reduce the behavioral response to nociceptin and histamine. On the other hand, the nociceptive response induced by nociceptin, but not histamine, was completely attenuated by the i.t. co-administration of agonists for GABAA and GABAB receptors. In contrast, the antagonists for GABAA and GABAB receptors injected i.t. showed same nociceptive response with nociceptin and histamine, and their nociceptive responses were significantly blocked by the i.t. co-administration of the H1 receptor antagonists, but not H2 receptor antagonists or ORL-1 receptor antagonists. The present results suggest that the activation of the ORL-1 receptor by nociceptin may induce the disinhibition of histaminergic neuron and enhance the release of histamine, which subsequently acts on the H1 receptor located on the SP-containing neurons to produce the spinal cord-mediated nociceptive response.

CENTRAL EFFECT OF HISTAMINE AND PERIPHERAL EFFECT OF HISTIDINE ON THE FORMALIN-INDUCED PAIN RESPONSE IN MICE

1. The present study was designed to investigate the role of brain histamine in modulating pain transmission in mice. 2. In conscious mice implanted with an intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) cannula, the effects of i.v.c. injections of normal saline (control) and low and high doses histamine (2 and 40 microg/mouse, respectively) were investigated on the duration of paw licking and biting induced by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of formalin (20 microL; 5%) into the plantar surface of the left hindpaw. 3. To clarify the involvement of histidine in the pain response, the effects of intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of low and high doses of histidine (50 and 1000 mg/kg, respectively) alone or before i.c.v. injection of histamine were also examined. 4. Intraplantar injection of formalin induced a biphasic pain response (first phase: 0-5 min after injection; second phase: 20-40 min after injection). 5. Histamine (2 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) had no effect on the first phase of the pain response, but suppressed the second phase. The higher dose of histamine (40 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) suppressed both phases of the pain response. 6. Histidine, at 50 mg/kg, i.p., had no effect on the pain response, but the higher dose (1000 mg/kg, i.p.) suppressed the both phases of the pain response. 7. Pretreatment with the low dose of histidine (50 mg/kg, i.p.) prior to administration of 2 microg/mouse, i.c.v., histamine did not change the antinociception induced by low-dose histamine. However, pretreatment with the high dose of histidine (1000 mg/kg, i.p.) prior to 2 microg/mouse, i.c.v., histamine produced antinociception that resembled that seen following administration of the high dose of either histidine or histamine. Pretreatment with the low dose of histidine (50 mg/kg, i.p.) prior to administration of 40 microg/mouse, i.c.v., histamine has no effect on the pain response following high-dose histamine. Pretreatment with 1000 mg/kg, i.p., histidine prior to administration of 40 microg/mouse, i.c.v., histamine strongly suppressed both phases of the formalin-induced pain response, particularly the second phase. 8. The results of the present study indicate that: (i) activation of brain histamine produces antinociception in the mouse formalin test; (ii) peripheral loading with a high dose of histidine (1000 mg/kg, i.p.) alone exerts the same effect as that seen following 40 microg/mouse, i.c.v., histamine; and (iii) pretreatment with a high dose of histidine potentiates central histamine-induced antinociception.

Nociceptive behavior induced by poly-l-lysine and other basic compounds involves the spinal NMDA receptors

We have previously shown that spermine, a basic polyamine, and big dynorphin, a basic polypeptide, induce nociceptive behavior if injected intrathecally (i.t.) in mice (see [Pain 86 (2000) 55-61] and [Brain Res. 952 (2002) 7-14]). This suggests that other basic molecules might have the same effects. Here, i.t. administration of poly-L-lysine (12 and 36 pg) to mice was found to produce the same characteristic behavioral response, biting and/or licking of the hindpaw and the tail along with slight hindlimb scratching directed toward the flank, which peaked at 0-10 min after injection. The behavior induced by poly-L-lysine (12 pg) was dose-dependently inhibited by intraperitoneal injection of morphine (0.25-4 mg/kg) and also dose-dependently, by i.t. co-administration of D-(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (D-APV) (1-4 nmol), a competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, (5R,10S)-(+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cycloheptene-5,10-imine hydrogen maleate (MK-801) (0.0156-4 nmol), an NMDA ion-channel blocker, and ifenprodil (2-8 nmol), an antagonist of the polyamine recognition site and the NR2B-containing NMDA receptor subtype. On the other hand, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX), a non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist, 7-chlorokynurenic acid, a competitive antagonist of the glycine recognition site on the NMDA receptor ion-channel complex, [D-Phe7, d-His9]-substance P (6-11), a specific antagonist for substance P (NK1) receptors, or MEN-10,376, a tachykinin NK2 receptor antagonist, had no effect. These results confirm the observations obtained with other basic molecules and suggest that the behavior induced by poly-l-lysine is mediated through the activation of the NMDA receptor ion-channel complex acting either on the polyamine recognition site or on the NR2B subunit.

Blockade of histamine H2 receptors of the periaqueductal gray and inferior colliculus induces fear-like behaviors

Electrical and chemical stimulation of the dorsal periaqueductal gray matter (dPAG) and the inferior colliculus (IC) induces escape behavior, usually accompanied by autonomic responses and antinociception. Recently, we presented evidence for a tonic inhibitory control exerted by H(2) histamine receptors on defensive behaviors generated in these midbrain tectum sites. Since treatments of these areas that elicit the defensive behavior repertoire frequently also have anxiogenic effects, we here used the elevated plus-maze (EPM) test for assessing the effects of microinjections of histamine (5-40 nmol), dimaprit (5-10 nmol) and ranitidine (10-30 nmol) into either dPAG or IC, which have a relative abundance of histamine-containing cells and histaminergic receptors. Dimaprit is an agonist and ranitidine is an antagonist of H(2) histamine receptors. Immediately after the injections, the animals were submitted to the EPM test. Whereas dPAG injections of dimaprit had no behavioral effects, histamine (40 nmol) caused a significant reduction in exploratory activity. On the other hand, ranitidine alone or following saline had aversive-like effects in both structures, i.e. reduced open arm, but not closed arm, entries. This pattern is usually interpreted as representing an anxiogenic effect. These effects were more pronounced after injection into dPAG than into IC. Freezing, the most prominent effect produced by ranitidine, was significantly inhibited by histamine as well as dimaprit. Thus, H(2) receptor blockade has fear-like action in the midbrain tectum with predominance in the dPAG. Such an action can be understood as a concomitant of defensive behavior, which has been shown to be a consequence of H(2) receptor antagonism in both dPAG and IC. The functional significance of the different effects of H(2) receptor blockade in dPAG and IC is discussed in the light of the probable distinct roles of these structures in the organization of defensive behavior.

Roles of histamine receptors in pain perception: A study using receptors gene knockout mice

To study the participation of histamine H1- and H2-receptors in pain perception, H1 and H2 receptor knockout (KO) mice were examined for pain threshold by means of three kinds of nociceptive tasks. These included assays for thermal, mechanical, and chemical nociception. H1KO mice showed significantly fewer nociceptive responses to the hot-plate, tail-flick, tail-pressure, paw-withdrawal, formalin, capsaicin, and abdominal constriction tests. Sensitivity to noxious stimuli in H1KO mice was significantly decreased when compared to wild-type mice. The antinociceptive phenotypes of H2KO were relatively less prominent when compared to H1KO mice. We also examined the antinociceptive effects of intrathecally-, intracerebroventricularly-, and subcutaneously-administered morphine in H1KO and H2KO mice. In these nociceptive assays, the antinociceptive effects produced by morphine were more enhanced in both H1KO and H2KO mice. The effects of histamine H1- and H2-receptor antagonists on morphine-induced antinociception were studied in ICR mice. The intrathecal, intracerebroventricular and subcutaneous co-administrations of d-chlorpheniramine enhanced the effects of morphine in all nociceptive assays examined. In addition, intrathecal co-administrations of cimetidine enhanced the antinociception of morphine in the hot plate tests. These results suggest that existing H1 and H2 receptors play an inhibitory role in morphine-induced antinociception in the spinal and supra-spinal levels.

Intrathecal histamine induces spinally mediated behavioral responses through tachykinin NK1 receptors

Intrathecal injection of histamine elicited a behavioral response consisting of scratching, biting and licking in conscious mice. Here, we have examined the involvement of substance P (SP) by using intrathecal injection of tachykinin neurokinin (NK)(1) receptor antagonists and SP antiserum. Histamine-induced behavioral response was evoked significantly 5-10 min after intrathecal injection and reached a maximum at 10-15 min. Dose-dependency of the induced response showed a bell-shaped pattern from 200 to 3200 pmol, and maximum effect was observed at 800-1000 pmol. The H(1) receptor antagonist, d-chlorpheniramine and pyrilamine but not the H(2) receptor antagonists, ranitidine and zolantidine, inhibited histamine-induced behavioral response. The NK(1) receptor antagonists, CP-99,994, RP-67580 and sendide, inhibited histamine-induced behavioral response in a dose-dependent manner. A significant antagonistic effect of [D-Phe(7), D-His(9)]SP (6-11), a selective antagonist for SP receptors, was observed against histamine-induced response. The NK(2) receptor antagonist, MEN-10376, had no effect on the response elicited by histamine. Pretreatment with SP antiserum resulted in a significant reduction of the response to histamine. No significant reduction of histamine-induced response was detected in mice pretreated with NK A antiserum. The present results suggest that elicitation of scratching, biting and licking behavior induced by intrathecal injection of histamine may be largely mediated by NK(1) receptors via H(1) receptors in the spinal cord.

Enhanced antinociception by intrathecally-administered morphine in histamine H1 receptor gene knockout mice

We previously reported that histamine H(1) receptor gene knockout mice (H1KO) showed lower spontaneous nociceptive threshold to pain stimuli when compared to wild-type mice. The objective of the present study was to examine the antinociceptive effect of intrathecally-administered morphine in H1KO mice. The antinociceptive effects of morphine were examined using assays for thermal (tail-flick, hot-plate, paw-withdrawal), mechanical (tail-pressure) and chemical nociception (formalin and capsaicin tests) using H1KO and wild-type mice. In these nociceptive assays, intrathecally-administered morphine produced significant antinociceptive effects in wild-type mice. The antinociceptive effect produced by intrathecally administered morphine was enhanced in the knockout mice. We also examined the effect of an histamine H(1) receptor antagonist, an active (d-) isomer of chlorpheniramine, on morphine-induced antinociception in ICR mice. The intrathecal co-administration of d-chlorpheniramine enhanced the effect of morphine in all nociceptive assays examined. The pharmacological experiments using d-chlorpheniramine further substantiate the evidence for the histamine H(1) receptor-mediated suppression of morphine-induced antinociception. These results suggest that existing H(1) receptors play an inhibitory role in morphine-induced antinociception at the spinal cord level.

Descending control of pain

Upon receipt in the dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord, nociceptive (pain-signalling) information from the viscera, skin and other organs is subject to extensive processing by a diversity of mechanisms, certain of which enhance, and certain of which inhibit, its transfer to higher centres. In this regard, a network of descending pathways projecting from cerebral structures to the DH plays a complex and crucial role. Specific centrifugal pathways either suppress (descending inhibition) or potentiate (descending facilitation) passage of nociceptive messages to the brain. Engagement of descending inhibition by the opioid analgesic, morphine, fulfils an important role in its pain-relieving properties, while induction of analgesia by the adrenergic agonist, clonidine, reflects actions at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (alpha(2)-ARs) in the DH normally recruited by descending pathways. However, opioids and adrenergic agents exploit but a tiny fraction of the vast panoply of mechanisms now known to be involved in the induction and/or expression of descending controls. For example, no drug interfering with descending facilitation is currently available for clinical use. The present review focuses on: (1) the organisation of descending pathways and their pathophysiological significance; (2) the role of individual transmitters and specific receptor types in the modulation and expression of mechanisms of descending inhibition and facilitation and (3) the advantages and limitations of established and innovative analgesic strategies which act by manipulation of descending controls. Knowledge of descending pathways has increased exponentially in recent years, so this is an opportune moment to survey their operation and therapeutic relevance to the improved management of pain.