Dopamine D2 receptors play a role in the (-)-apomorphine-like discriminative stimulus effects of (+)-PD 128907

Feeding condition and the relative contribution of different dopamine receptor subtypes to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in rats

RATIONALE

The contribution of dopamine receptor subtypes in mediating the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine is not fully established. Many drug discrimination studies use food to maintain responding, necessitating food restriction, which can alter drug effects.

OBJECTIVE

This study established stimulus control with cocaine (10 mg/kg) in free-feeding and food-restricted rats responding under a schedule of stimulus shock termination (SST) and in food-restricted rats responding under a schedule of food presentation to examine whether feeding condition or the reinforcer used to maintain responding impacts the effects of cocaine.

METHOD

Dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists were examined for their ability to mimic or attenuate, respectively, the effects of cocaine.

RESULTS

Apomorphine, quinpirole, and lisuride occasioned >90 % responding on the cocaine-associated lever in free-feeding rats responding under a schedule of SST; apomorphine, but not quinpirole or lisuride, occasioned >90 % responding on the cocaine lever in food-restricted rats responding under a schedule of SST. In food-restricted rats responding for food these drugs occasioned little cocaine lever responding and were comparatively more potent in decreasing responding. In free-feeding rats, the effects of cocaine were attenuated by the D2/D3 receptor antagonist raclopride and the D3 receptor-selective antagonist PG01037. In food-restricted rats, raclopride and the D2 receptor-selective antagonist L-741,626 attenuated the effects of cocaine. Raclopride antagonized quinpirole in all groups while PG01037 antagonized quinpirole only in free-feeding rats.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate significant differences in the discriminative stimulus of cocaine that are due to feeding conditions and not to the use of different reinforcers across procedures.

You are what you eat: influence of type and amount of food consumed on central dopamine systems and the behavioral effects of direct- and indirect-acting dopamine receptor agonists

The important role of dopamine (DA) in mediating feeding behavior and the positive reinforcing effects of some drugs is well recognized. Less widely studied is how feeding conditions might impact the sensitivity of drugs acting on DA systems. Food restriction, for example, has often been the focus of aging and longevity studies; however, other studies have demonstrated that mild food restriction markedly increases sensitivity to direct- and indirect-acting DA receptor agonists. Moreover, it is becoming clear that not only the amount of food, but the type of food, is an important factor in modifying the effects of drugs. Given the increased consumption of high fat and sugary foods, studies are exploring how consumption of highly palatable food impacts DA neurochemistry and the effects of drugs acting on these systems. For example, eating high fat chow increases sensitivity to some behavioral effects of direct- as well as indirect-acting DA receptor agonists. A compelling mechanistic possibility is that central DA pathways that mediate the effects of some drugs are regulated by one or more of the endocrine hormones (e.g. insulin) that undergo marked changes during food restriction or after consuming high fat or sugary foods. Although traditionally recognized as an important signaling molecule in regulating energy homeostasis, insulin can also regulate DA neurochemistry. Because direct- and indirect-acting DA receptor drugs are used therapeutically and some are abused, a better understanding of how food intake impacts response to these drugs would likely facilitate improved treatment of clinical disorders and provide information that would be relevant to the causes of vulnerability to abuse drugs. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Central Control of Food Intake'.

Eating high-fat chow increases the sensitivity of rats to quinpirole-induced discriminative stimulus effects and yawning

Discriminative stimulus effects of direct acting dopamine receptor agonists (e.g. quinpirole) appear to be mediated by D3 receptors in free-feeding rats. Free access to high-fat chow increases sensitivity to quinpirole-induced yawning, and this study examined whether eating high-fat chow increases sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus effects of quinpirole. Five rats discriminated between 0.032 mg/kg quinpirole and vehicle while responding under a continuous reinforcement schedule of stimulus shock termination. When rats had free access to high-fat chow (discrimination training was suspended), the quinpirole discrimination dose-response curve shifted leftward, possibly indicating enhanced sensitivity at D3 receptors. In the same rats, both the ascending (mediated by D3 receptors) and descending (mediated by D2 receptors) limbs of the dose-response curve for quinpirole-induced yawning shifted leftward. When rats had free access to a standard chow (discrimination training was suspended), the quinpirole discrimination and yawning dose-response curves did not change. Together with published data showing that the discriminative stimulus effects of quinpirole in free-feeding rats are mediated by D3 receptors and the insensitivity of this effect of quinpirole to food restriction (shown to increase sensitivity to D2 but not D3-mediated effects), these results suggest that the leftward shift of the discrimination dose-response curve when rats eat high-fat chow is likely because of enhanced sensitivity at D3 receptors. Thus, eating high-fat food enhances drug effects in a manner that might impact clinical effects of drugs or vulnerability to drug abuse.

Dopamine D3 receptors mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of quinpirole in free-feeding rats

The discriminative stimulus effects of dopamine (DA) D3/D2 receptor agonists are thought to be mediated by D2 receptors. To maintain responding, access to food is often restricted, which can alter neurochemical and behavioral effects of drugs acting on DA systems. This study established stimulus control with quinpirole in free-feeding rats and tested the ability of agonists to mimic and antagonists to attenuate the effects of quinpirole. The same antagonists were studied for their ability to attenuate quinpirole-induced yawning and hypothermia. DA receptor agonists apomorphine and lisuride, but not amphetamine and morphine, occasioned responding on the quinpirole lever. The discriminative stimulus effects of quinpirole were attenuated by the D3 receptor-selective antagonist N-{4-[4-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-piperazin-1-yl]-trans-but-2-enyl}-4-pyridine-2-yl-benzamide HCl (PG01037) and the nonselective D3/D2 receptor antagonist raclopride, but not by the D2 receptor-selective antagonist 3-[4-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-hydroxypiperidin-1-yl]methyl-1H-indole (L-741,626); the potencies of PG01037 and raclopride to antagonize this effect of quinpirole paralleled their potencies to antagonize the ascending limb of the quinpirole yawning dose-response curve (thought to be mediated by D3 receptors). L-741,626 selectively antagonized the descending limb of the quinpirole yawning dose-response curve, and both L-741,626 and raclopride, but not PG01037, antagonized the hypothermic effects of quinpirole (thought to be mediated by D2 receptors). Food restriction (10 g/day/7 days) significantly decreased quinpirole-induced yawning without affecting the quinpirole discrimination. Many discrimination studies on DA receptor agonists use food-restricted rats; together with those studies, the current experiment using free-feeding rats suggests that feeding conditions affecting the behavioral effects of direct-acting DA receptor agonists might also have an impact on the effects of indirect-acting agonists such as cocaine and amphetamine.

Discriminative stimulus properties of S32504, a novel D3/D2 receptor agonist and antiparkinson agent, in rats: attenuation by the antipsychotics, aripiprazole, bifeprunox, N-desmethylclozapine, and by selective antagonists at dopamine D2 but not D3 receptors

RATIONALE

Drug-discrimination studies have proven instructive in the characterization of psychotropic agents, a procedure applied herein to the novel antiparkinson agent, S32504. This highly selective agonist at dopamine D(3) and (less potently) D(2) receptors displays potent antiparkinson, neuroprotective and antidepressant properties (Millan et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther 309:936-950, 2004a; Millan et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther 309:903-920, 2004b; Millan et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther 309:921-935, 2004c).

OBJECTIVES

To generate a discriminative stimulus (DS) with S32504 and undertake substitution/antagonism studies with diverse antiparkinson and antipsychotic agents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a two-lever, fixed-ratio 10 schedule, rats were trained to recognize S32504 (0.04 mg/kg, s.c.) from saline.

RESULTS

S32504 displayed dose-dependent and stereospecific substitution in comparison to its less active racemic form, (+/-) S31411, and to its inactive (-) distomer, S32601. Apomorphine, and the selective D(3)/D(2) receptor agonists, ropinirole, PD128,907, 7-OH-DPAT and CGS15855A, fully (=80%) substituted for S32504, whereas D(4) and D(1)/D(5) receptor agonists were ineffective. The selective D(3) vs D(2) receptor partial agonist, BP897, did not substitute for S32504 and the selective D(3) receptor antagonists, S33084, SB277,011, GR218,231, PNU99194A and S14297, did not block its DS properties. By contrast, S32504 lever selection was blocked by the preferential D(2) vs D(3) receptor antagonists, L741,626 and S23199, and by the D(2)/D(3) antagonists, raclopride and haloperidol. The D(2)/D(3) receptor partial agonists and antipsychotics, aripiprazole, bifeprunox, N-desmethylclozapine and preclamol did not substitute for S32504: indeed, they dose-dependently attenuated its DS properties.

CONCLUSION

The antiparkinson agent, S32504, displays DS properties principally mediated by high-efficacy activation of D(2) receptors Antipsychotics known to act as partial agonists at D(2)/D(3) receptors attenuate DS properties of S32504, actions reflecting their low efficacy at these sites.

The structural evolution of dopamine D3 receptor ligands: structure-activity relationships and selected neuropharmacological aspects

"Evolution consists largely of molecular tinkering."-Following the famous concept of the molecular geneticist and medicine Nobel laureate François Jacob, in this review we describe the structural evolution of dopamine D3 receptor ligands from the natural agonist dopamine (DA) to highly potent and subtype selective new agents by bioisosteric tinkering with well-established and privileged or novel and fancy chemical functionalities and scaffolds. Some of the more than 200 ligands presented herein have already achieved therapeutic or scientific value up to now, some will most likely achieve it in the future. Hence, great importance is not only attached to the relationship between structure and activity of the ligands, but also to their utility as pharmacological tools in animal models or as therapeutics in patients with neurological diseases or other disorders.

CB2 cannabinoid receptor activation produces antinociception by stimulating peripheral release of endogenous opioids

CB(2) cannabinoid receptor-selective agonists are promising candidates for the treatment of pain. CB(2) receptor activation inhibits acute, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain responses but does not cause central nervous system (CNS) effects, consistent with the lack of CB(2) receptors in the normal CNS. To date, there has been virtually no information regarding the mechanism of CB(2) receptor-mediated inhibition of pain responses. Here, we test the hypothesis that CB(2) receptor activation stimulates release from keratinocytes of the endogenous opioid beta-endorphin, which then acts at opioid receptors on primary afferent neurons to inhibit nociception. The antinociceptive effects of the CB(2) receptor-selective agonist AM1241 were prevented in rats when naloxone or antiserum to beta-endorphin was injected in the hindpaw where the noxious thermal stimulus was applied, suggesting that beta-endorphin is necessary for CB(2) receptor-mediated antinociception. Further, AM1241 did not inhibit nociception in mu-opioid receptor-deficient mice. Hindpaw injection of beta-endorphin was sufficient to produce antinociception. AM1241 stimulated beta-endorphin release from rat skin tissue and from cultured human keratinocytes. This stimulation was prevented by AM630, a CB(2) cannabinoid receptor-selective antagonist and was not observed in skin from CB(2) cannabinoid receptor-deficient mice. These data suggest that CB(2) receptor activation stimulates release from keratinocytes of beta-endorphin, which acts at local neuronal mu-opioid receptors to inhibit nociception. Supporting this possibility, CB(2) immunolabeling was detected on beta-endorphin-containing keratinocytes in stratum granulosum throughout the epidermis of the hindpaw. This mechanism allows for the local release of beta-endorphin, where CB(2) receptors are present, leading to anatomical specificity of opioid effects.

Activation of CB2 cannabinoid receptors by AM1241 inhibits experimental neuropathic pain: pain inhibition by receptors not present in the CNS

We designed AM1241, a selective CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonist, and used it to test the hypothesis that CB2 receptor activation would reverse the sensory hypersensitivity observed in neuropathic pain states. AM1241 exhibits high affinity and selectivity for CB2 receptors. It also exhibits high potency in vivo. AM1241 dose-dependently reversed tactile and thermal hypersensitivity produced by ligation of the L5 and L6 spinal nerves in rats. These effects were selectively antagonized by a CB2 but not by a CB1 receptor antagonist, suggesting that they were produced by actions of AM1241 at CB2 receptors. AM1241 was also active in blocking spinal nerve ligation-induced tactile and thermal hypersensitivity in mice lacking CB1 receptors (CB1-/- mice), confirming that AM1241 reverses sensory hypersensitivity independent of actions at CB1 receptors. These findings demonstrate a mechanism leading to the inhibition of pain, one that targets receptors localized exclusively outside the CNS. Further, they suggest the potential use of CB2 receptor-selective agonists for treatment of human neuropathic pain, a condition currently without consistently effective therapies. CB2 receptor-selective agonist medications are predicted to be without the CNS side effects that limit the effectiveness of currently available medications.

Generalization of serotonin (5-HT)1A agonists and the antipsychotics, clozapine, ziprasidone and S16924, but not haloperidol, to the discriminative stimuli elicited by PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT

Rats were trained to recognize a discriminative stimulus (DS) elicited by the dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor agonist, PD128,907 (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.), which suppressed frontocortical release of dopamine (DA) but not 5-HT. The selective 5-HT1A receptor agonists, 8-OH-DPAT and flesinoxan, dose-dependently generalized to PD128,907 with effective dose(50)s (ED50s) of 0.08 and 1.5mg/kg, s.c., respectively, and inhibited the release and synthesis of 5-HT but not of DA. The 'atypical' antipsychotic, clozapine, which displays weak partial agonist properties at 5-HT1A receptors, dose-dependently, though partially, generalized to PD128,907 (50%, 2.5mg/kg, s.c.). Further, S16924 and ziprasidone, which in a like manner, display partial agonist activity at 5-HT1A receptors, generalized with ED50s of 0.6 and 2.3mg/kg, s.c., respectively. In contrast, haloperidol, which is devoid of affinity at 5-HT1A sites, was inactive. At doses equivalent to those generalizing to PD128,907, clozapine, S16924 and ziprasidone reduced serotonergic (but not dopaminergic) transmission, whereas haloperidol was inactive. In rats trained to recognize a further D2/D3 agonist, 7-OH-DPAT (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.), generalization was obtained similarly with 8-OH-DPAT (ED50 = 0.07 mg/kg, s.c.), flesinoxan (3.4) and clozapine (0.6), but not with haloperidol. In conclusion, although PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT do not directly interact with 5-HT1A receptors or influence serotonergic transmission, their DS properties are mimicked by 5-HT1A receptor agonists at doses activating 5-HT1A but not D2/D3 (auto)receptors. These observations likely account for generalization of clozapine, S16924 and ziprasidone to PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT inasmuch as they behave as antagonists at D2/D3 receptors, yet agonists at 5-HT1A (auto)receptors.

Discriminative stimulus properties of the dopamine D3 receptor agonists, PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT: a comparative characterization with novel ligands at D3 versus D2 receptors

Rats were trained to recognize a discriminative stimulus (DS) elicited by the preferential dopamine D3 receptor agonists, PD128,907 (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.) and 7-OH-DPAT (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.). PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT showed "full" (> or = 80%) and mutual generalization. Chemically-diverse, preferential D3 versus D2 agonists, quinelorane, CGS15855A, pramipexole, ropinirole and piribedil, generalized to PD128,907 (and 7-OH-DPAT) in this order of potency, which correlated more strongly with affinity/activity at cloned human (h)D3 (r=0.68/0.81, n=7) than hD2 (0.27/0.64, n=7) receptors. Further, generalization potency strongly correlated with potency for suppression of response rates (0.86), induction of hypothermia (0.92), reduction of striatal dopamine turnover (0.92) and diminution of immobility in a forced-swim procedure (0.97). Nafadotride, UH232 and AJ76, which show a mild preference for D3 versus D2 sites, blocked the PD128,907 DS, and the modestly-selective D3 antagonist, U99194A, was partially effective. Both nafadotride and U99194A blocked the 7-OH-DPAT DS. However, antagonist potency (n=4) versus PD128,907 correlated better with affinity at D2 (0.89) versus D3 (0.27) sites. Further, whereas the preferential D2 versus D3 antagonist, L741,626, antagonized the PD128,907 DS, the selective D3 antagonists, S11566, S14297 (its eutomer) and GR218,231 were ineffective against PD128907 and 7-OH-DPAT DS. S11566 and GR218,231 likewise did not generalize to PD128,907. In conclusion, under the present conditions, D2 receptors are principally implicated in the DS properties of PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT.

The D3 antagonist PNU-99194A potentiates the discriminative cue produced by the D3 agonist 7-OH-DPAT

Based on correlations between potencies of various dopamine D2/D3 agonists to substitute for the 7-OH-DPAT discriminative cue and their in vitro (mitogenesis test) potencies, it has been suggested that the 7-OH-DPAT cue is mediated by activity at the D3 subtype. We sought to verify that the 7-OH-DPAT cue could be blocked by PNU-99194A, a commercially available preferential D3 antagonist. Rats were trained (FR10 two-lever, food-reinforced schedule) to press one lever following 7-OH-DPAT (0.1 mg/kg i.p.) and the other lever following saline. Rats were then tested with various doses of 7-OH-DPAT alone or in combination with PNU-99194A. 7-OH-DPAT (0.003 to 0.3 mg/kg) engendered dose-dependent substitution; PNU-99194A (1 to 10 mg/kg) failed to antagonize the cue induced by 0.1 mg/kg of 7-OH-DPAT and, at 10 mg/kg, given in combination with 0.003 to 0.1 mg/kg of 7-OH-DPAT, PNU-99194A markedly shifted the 7-OH-DPAT dose-effect curve to the left, i.e., potentiated the 7-OH-DPAT cue. If PNU-99194A is a preferential D3 antagonist, the present data do not confirm the previous hypothesis that the 7-OH-DPAT cue is mediated by the D3 subtype.

Discriminative stimulus properties of antipsychotics

Drug discrimination methodology has been used in a number of ways to analyze the actions of novel and putative novel antipsychotics in vivo. Recent studies suggest (a) in contrast to earlier theorizing, antagonism of the low-dose d-amphetamine stimulus in rats may not be an effective screen for novel antipsychotics; (b) dopamine D2-like agonists and antagonists, some of which are putative antipsychotics, can be studied in vivo as discriminative cues, although there is a pressing need for more selective drugs that differentiate the various members of the D2 family. (c) antagonism of the cue induced by the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist MK-801, which has been proposed as a possible screen for clozapine-like compounds, may be an unreliable assay; and (d) the clozapine stimulus is probably a compound cue (a drug "mixture"), which can be used to screen for novel clozapine-like antipsychotics, although the precise receptor mechanisms involved in mediating the clozapine stimulus, and its direct relevance to the antipsychotic action of clozapine remains to be proven conclusively.

Discriminative stimulus properties of the putative dopamine D3 receptor agonist, (+)-PD 128907: role of presynaptic dopamine D2 autoreceptors

The putative D3 receptor agonist, (+)-PD 128907, is widely used to study the functional relevance of D3 receptors in vivo. Given that non-selective D2/3/4 receptor agonists serve as effective discriminative stimuli in rats we have trained animals to discriminate (+)-PD 128907 (30 microg kg(-1), s.c.) from saline and examined the pharmacological specificity of the response. Consistent with a D3 receptor mediated response, the non-selective D2/3 receptor agonist apomorphine and the D3 preferring agonists 7-OH-DPAT and (-) quinpirole generalised to the cue whilst the D2/3 receptor antagonists haloperidol, raclopride, spiperone and (+)-butaclamol antagonised drug lever responding. In contrast, the D1 selective agonist (+/-)-SKF 81297 and D1/5 selective antagonist, R-(+)-SCH 23390 had no effect. Results also suggest that presynaptic dopamine receptors are involved. Thus the dopamine depleting agent alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine potentiated the effects of a submaximal dose of (+)-PD 128907 whereas amphetamine failed to generalise per se and blocked (+)-PD 128907 lever selection. However, studies using subtype selective antagonists argue against a role for the D3 receptor. Thus the 10-fold selective D2 receptor antagonist L-741,626 blocked the (+)-PD 128907 discriminative stimulus whereas L-745,829 and GR 103,691, antagonists > 40 and > 100-fold selective for D3 receptors, failed to modify the response. These results suggest that presynaptic D2 receptors mediate the discriminative stimulus properties of (+)-PD 128907 and highlight the lack of selectivity of (+)-PD 128907 for D3 receptors in vivo.