1
|
Seyedabadi M, Ghahremani MH, Albert PR. Biased signaling of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs): Molecular determinants of GPCR/transducer selectivity and therapeutic potential. Pharmacol Ther 2019; 200:148-178. [PMID: 31075355 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) convey signals across membranes via interaction with G proteins. Originally, an individual GPCR was thought to signal through one G protein family, comprising cognate G proteins that mediate canonical receptor signaling. However, several deviations from canonical signaling pathways for GPCRs have been described. It is now clear that GPCRs can engage with multiple G proteins and the line between cognate and non-cognate signaling is increasingly blurred. Furthermore, GPCRs couple to non-G protein transducers, including β-arrestins or other scaffold proteins, to initiate additional signaling cascades. Receptor/transducer selectivity is dictated by agonist-induced receptor conformations as well as by collateral factors. In particular, ligands stabilize distinct receptor conformations to preferentially activate certain pathways, designated 'biased signaling'. In this regard, receptor sequence alignment and mutagenesis have helped to identify key receptor domains for receptor/transducer specificity. Furthermore, molecular structures of GPCRs bound to different ligands or transducers have provided detailed insights into mechanisms of coupling selectivity. However, receptor dimerization, compartmentalization, and trafficking, receptor-transducer-effector stoichiometry, and ligand residence and exposure times can each affect GPCR coupling. Extrinsic factors including cell type or assay conditions can also influence receptor signaling. Understanding these factors may lead to the development of improved biased ligands with the potential to enhance therapeutic benefit, while minimizing adverse effects. In this review, evidence for ligand-specific GPCR signaling toward different transducers or pathways is elaborated. Furthermore, molecular determinants of biased signaling toward these pathways and relevant examples of the potential clinical benefits and pitfalls of biased ligands are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Seyedabadi
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Iran; Education Development Center, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Iran
| | | | - Paul R Albert
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Neuroscience, University of Ottawa, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Idris AI, Ralston SH. Role of cannabinoids in the regulation of bone remodeling. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2012; 3:136. [PMID: 23181053 PMCID: PMC3499879 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2012.00136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2012] [Accepted: 10/25/2012] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The endocannabinoid system plays a key role in regulating a variety of physiological processes such as appetite control and energy balance, pain perception, and immune responses. Recent studies have implicated the endocannabinoid system in the regulation of bone cell activity and bone remodeling. These studies showed that endogenous cannabinoid ligands, cannabinoid receptors, and the enzymes responsible for ligand synthesis and breakdown all play important roles in bone mass and in the regulation of bone disease. These findings suggest that the endocannabinoid pathway could be of value as a therapeutic target for the prevention and treatment of bone diseases. Here, we review the role of the skeletal endocannabinoid system in the regulation of bone remodeling in health and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aymen I. Idris
- Bone and Cancer Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, The University of EdinburghEdinburgh, UK
| | - Stuart H. Ralston
- Rheumatic Disease Unit, The Centre for Molecular Medicine, The University of EdinburghEdinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Inverse agonism of cannabinoid CB1 receptor blocks the adhesion of encephalitogenic T cells in inflamed brain venules by a protein kinase A-dependent mechanism. J Neuroimmunol 2011; 233:97-105. [PMID: 21216016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2010] [Revised: 11/22/2010] [Accepted: 12/10/2010] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
It is well known that the cannabinoid system has a significant role in the regulation of the immune responses. Cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 are expressed on T lymphocytes and mediate the immunomodulatory effects of cannabinoids on T cell functions. Here we show that the treatment of proteolipid protein (PLP)139-151-specific T cells with SR141716A, a CB1 inverse agonist and prototype of the diarylpyrazoles series, induced a strong inhibition of firm adhesion in inflamed brain venules in intravital microscopy experiments. In contrast, SR144528, a potent CB2 inverse agonist, had no significant effect on both rolling and arrest of activated T cells. In addition, two analogs of SR141716A and CB1 inverse agonists, AM251 and AM281 inhibited encephalitogenic T cell adhesion suggesting that selective CB1 inverse agonism interfere with lymphocyte trafficking in the CNS. Flow cytometry experiments showed that CB1 inverse agonists have no effect on adhesion molecule expression suggesting that CB1 blockade interferes with signal transduction pathways controlling T cell adhesion in inflamed brain venules. In addition, integrin clustering was not altered after treatment with CB1 inverse agonists suggesting that adhesion blockade is not due to the modulation of integrin valency. Notably, the inhibitory effect exerted by AM251 and AM281 on the adhesive interactions was completely reverted in the presence of protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor H89, suggesting that cAMP and PKA activation play a key role in the adhesion blockade mediated by CB1 inverse agonists. To further strengthen these results and unveil a previously unknown inhibitory role of cAMP on activated T cell adhesion in vivo in the context of CNS inflammation, we showed that intracellular increase of cAMP induced by treatment with Bt2cAMP, a permeable analog of cAMP, and phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor theophylline efficiently blocked the arrest of encephalitogenic T cells in inflamed brain venules. Our data show that modulation of CB1 function has anti-inflammatory effects and suggests that inverse agonism of CB1 block signal transduction mechanisms controlling encephalitogenic T cells adhesion in inflamed brain venules by a PKA-dependent mechanism.
Collapse
|
4
|
Constitutive activity at the cannabinoid CB1 receptor is required for behavioral response to noxious chemical stimulation of TRPV1: antinociceptive actions of CB1 inverse agonists. J Neurosci 2008; 28:11593-602. [PMID: 18987195 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3322-08.2008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The potential modulation of TRPV1 nociceptive activity by the CB(1) receptor was investigated here using CB(1) wild-type (WT) and knock-out (KO) mice as well as selective CB(1) inverse agonists. No significant differences were detected in baseline thermal thresholds of ICR, CB(1)WT or CB(1)KO mice. Intraplantar capsaicin produced dose- and time-related paw flinch responses in ICR and CB(1)WT mice and induced plasma extravasation yet minimal responses were seen in CB(1)KO animals with no apparent differences in TRPV1 channel expression. Capsaicin-evoked CGRP release from spinal cord tissue and capsaicin-evoked action potentials on isolated skin-nerve preparation were significantly decreased in CB(1)KO mice. Pretreatment with intraplantar galanin and bradykinin, compounds known to sensitize TRPV1 receptors, restored capsaicin-induced flinching in CB(1)KO mice. The possibility that constitutive activity at the CB(1) receptor is required to maintain the TRPV1 receptor in a "sensitized" state was tested using CB(1) inverse agonists. The CB(1) inverse agonists elicited concentration-related inhibition of capsaicin-induced calcium influx in F-11 cells and produced dose-related inhibition of capsaicin-induced flinching in ICR mice. These data suggest that constitutive activity at the CB(1) receptor maintains the TRPV1 channel in a sensitized state responsive to noxious chemical stimuli. Treatment with CB(1) inverse agonists may promote desensitization of the channel resulting in antinociceptive actions against chemical stimulus modalities. These studies propose possible therapeutic exploitation of a novel mechanism providing pain relief by CB(1) inverse agonists.
Collapse
|
5
|
Verhoeckx KCM, Korthout HAAJ, van Meeteren-Kreikamp AP, Ehlert KA, Wang M, van der Greef J, Rodenburg RJT, Witkamp RF. Unheated Cannabis sativa extracts and its major compound THC-acid have potential immuno-modulating properties not mediated by CB1 and CB2 receptor coupled pathways. Int Immunopharmacol 2005; 6:656-65. [PMID: 16504929 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2005.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2005] [Revised: 09/30/2005] [Accepted: 10/10/2005] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
There is a great interest in the pharmacological properties of cannabinoid like compounds that are not linked to the adverse effects of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), e.g. psychoactive properties. The present paper describes the potential immuno-modulating activity of unheated Cannabis sativa extracts and its main non-psychoactive constituent Delta(9)-tetrahydrocanabinoid acid (THCa). By heating Cannabis extracts, THCa was shown to be converted into THC. Unheated Cannabis extract and THCa were able to inhibit the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) levels in culture supernatants from U937 macrophages and peripheral blood macrophages after stimulation with LPS in a dose-dependent manner. This inhibition persisted over a longer period of time, whereas after prolonged exposure time THC and heated Cannabis extract tend to induce the TNF-alpha level. Furthermore we demonstrated that THCa and THC show distinct effects on phosphatidylcholine specific phospholipase C (PC-PLC) activity. Unheated Cannabis extract and THCa inhibit the PC-PLC activity in a dose-dependent manner, while THC induced PC-PLC activity at high concentrations. These results suggest that THCa and THC exert their immuno-modulating effects via different metabolic pathways.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Cannabis/chemistry
- Cannabis/immunology
- Cell Line
- Cells, Cultured
- Cyclic AMP/pharmacology
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
- Dronabinol/pharmacology
- Hot Temperature
- Humans
- Immunologic Factors
- Macrophage Activation/drug effects
- Macrophages/drug effects
- Macrophages/immunology
- Plant Extracts/chemistry
- Plant Extracts/pharmacology
- Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1/antagonists & inhibitors
- Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1/drug effects
- Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2/antagonists & inhibitors
- Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2/drug effects
- Signal Transduction/drug effects
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism
- Type C Phospholipases/metabolism
Collapse
|
6
|
Heydorn A, Ward RJ, Jorgensen R, Rosenkilde MM, Frimurer TM, Milligan G, Kostenis E. Identification of a novel site within G protein alpha subunits important for specificity of receptor-G protein interaction. Mol Pharmacol 2004; 66:250-9. [PMID: 15266015 DOI: 10.1124/mol.66.2.250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Several domains of G protein alpha subunits are implicated in the control of receptor-G protein coupling specificity. Among these are the extreme N-and C-termini, the alpha4/beta6-loops, and the loop linking the N-terminal alpha-helix to the beta1-strand of the ras-like domain. In this study, we illustrate that single-point mutations of a highly conserved glycine residue within the linker I region of the Galpha(q) subunit confers upon the mutant Galpha(q) the ability to be activated by Galpha(i)- and Galpha(s) -coupled receptors, as evidenced by guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate binding and inositol phosphate turnover assays. The mutations did not affect expression of Galpha(q) proteins nor their ability to stimulate phospholipase Cbeta. It is noteworthy that both mutant and wild-type Galpha(q) proteins are indistinguishable in their ability to reconstitute a functional Gq-PLCbeta-calcium signaling pathway when cotransfected with the Galpha(q)-coupled neurokinin 1 or muscarinic M3 receptor into mouse embryonic fibroblasts derived from Galpha(q/11) knockout mice. On a three-dimensional model of the receptor-G protein complex, the highly conserved linker I region connecting the helical and the GTPase domain of the Galpha protein is inaccessible to the intracellular surface of the receptors. Our data indicate that receptor-G protein coupling specificity is not exclusively governed by direct receptor-G protein interaction and that it even bypasses the requirement of the extreme C terminus of Galpha, a well accepted receptor recognition domain, suggesting a novel allosteric mechanism for G protein-coupled receptor-G protein selectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Heydorn
- Laboratory for Molecular Pharmacology, the Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
McPartland JM. Phylogenomic and chemotaxonomic analysis of the endocannabinoid system. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2004; 45:18-29. [PMID: 15063097 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2003.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2003] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The endocannabinoid system consists of two cannabinoid (CB) receptors, seven ligands, and ligand-catabolizing enzymes such as fatty acid amid hydrolase (FAAH) and monoglyceride lipase (MGL). The system's phylogenetic distribution is poorly known. The ligands cannot be molecularly investigated because they are not polypeptides and their specific synthetic enzymes have not been identified, so no sequences are available. Ligand phylogenetics can be inferred, nonetheless, by their presence in a range of extant organisms. Thus a meta-analysis of ligand extraction studies was performed (chemotaxonomy), and compared to a molecular search for homologs of CB receptors, vanilloid receptors (VR1), FAAH, and MGL in the genomes of sequenced organisms (phylogenomics). Putative homologs underwent functional mapping to ascertain the presence of critical amino acid motifs known to impart protein functionality. From an evolutionary perspective it appears that (1) endocannabinoid ligands evolved before CB receptors; (2) the ligands evolved independently multiple times; (3) CB receptors evolved prior to the metazoan-bilaterian divergence (ie, between extant Hydra and leech), but were secondarily lost in the Ecdysozoa; (4) VR1 may predate CB receptors but its affinity for endocannabinoids is a recent acquisition, appearing after the lower vertebrate-mammal divergence; (5) MGL may be as old as the ligands, whereas FAAH evolved recently, after the appearance of vertebrates. FAAH's emergence correlates with VR1's newly-found affinity for anandamide; this overlap in evolutionary time is recapitulated by complementary distribution patterns of FAAH, VR1, and anandamide in the brain. Linking FAAH, VR1, and anandamide implies a coupling among the remaining "older" parts of the endocannabinoid system, MGL, CB receptors, and 2-AG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M McPartland
- GW Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Porton Down Science Park, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Klein TW, Newton C, Larsen K, Lu L, Perkins I, Nong L, Friedman H. The cannabinoid system and immune modulation. J Leukoc Biol 2003; 74:486-96. [PMID: 12960289 DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0303101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 366] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Studies on the effects of marijuana smoking have evolved into the discovery and description of the endocannabinoid system. To date, this system is composed of two receptors, CB1 and CB2, and endogenous ligands including anandamide, 2-arachidonoyl glycerol, and others. CB1 receptors and ligands are found in the brain as well as immune and other peripheral tissues. Conversely, CB2 receptors and ligands are found primarily in the periphery, especially in immune cells. Cannabinoid receptors are G protein-coupled receptors, and they have been linked to signaling pathways and gene activities in common with this receptor family. In addition, cannabinoids have been shown to modulate a variety of immune cell functions in humans and animals and more recently, have been shown to modulate T helper cell development, chemotaxis, and tumor development. Many of these drug effects occur through cannabinoid receptor signaling mechanisms and the modulation of cytokines and other gene products. It appears the immunocannabinoid system is involved in regulating the brain-immune axis and might be exploited in future therapies for chronic diseases and immune deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas W Klein
- University of South Florida, College of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Tampa 33612, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chan ASL, Law PY, Loh HH, Ho PNN, Wu WM, Chan JSC, Wong YH. The first and third intracellular loops together with the carboxy terminal tail of the δ-opioid receptor contribute toward functional interaction with Gα16. J Neurochem 2003; 87:697-708. [PMID: 14535952 DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02040.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Opioid peptides exert their regulatory effects on both central and peripheral nervous systems via multiple opioid receptors that are linked to seemingly identical sets of guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins). In contrast to the mu-opioid receptor, the delta-opioid receptor can efficiently stimulate phospholipase C via G16. We used a series of mu/delta-opioid receptor chimeras to examine the involvement of intracellular receptor domains in the recognition of G16. After ascertaining that the chimeras can bind opioid ligands with high affinity and elicit inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, COS-7 cells were cotransfected with cDNAs encoding Galpha16 and a mu/delta-opioid receptor chimera and assayed for [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin-induced stimulation of phospholipase C. Our results indicate that (i) the carboxy terminal tail of the delta-opioid receptor is necessary but insufficient for conferring coupling to Galpha16, (ii) the third inner loop together with the carboxy terminal tail of the delta-opioid receptor can provide sufficient contact domains for Galpha16, and (iii) the first inner loop of the delta-opioid receptor, in particular Leu80, as well as the fifth transmembrane domain and/or the third extracellular loop may also contribute in defining the fidelity of interaction between the delta-opioid receptor and Galpha16. These results indicate that efficient coupling of the delta-opioid receptor to Galpha16 requires the participation of most of the intracellular regions, including the first intracellular loop.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Amino Acid Sequence
- Animals
- COS Cells
- Enkephalin, Leucine-2-Alanine/pharmacology
- GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11
- Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins/genetics
- Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins/metabolism
- Mice
- Molecular Sequence Data
- Mutagenesis, Site-Directed
- Protein Binding/genetics
- Protein Binding/physiology
- Protein Structure, Tertiary/physiology
- Rats
- Receptors, Opioid, delta/genetics
- Receptors, Opioid, delta/metabolism
- Receptors, Opioid, mu/genetics
- Receptors, Opioid, mu/metabolism
- Recombinant Fusion Proteins/genetics
- Recombinant Fusion Proteins/metabolism
- Sequence Homology, Amino Acid
- Structure-Activity Relationship
- Transfection
- Type C Phospholipases/drug effects
- Type C Phospholipases/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony S L Chan
- Department of Biochemistry, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
McPartland JM, Glass M. Functional mapping of cannabinoid receptor homologs in mammals, other vertebrates, and invertebrates. Gene 2003; 312:297-303. [PMID: 12909367 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(03)00638-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Over the past decade, several putative homologs of cannabinoid receptors (CBRs) have been identified by homology screening. Homology screening utilizes sequence alignment search engines to recognize homologs. We investigated these putative CBR homologs further by 'functional mapping' of their deduced amino acid sequences. The entire pharmacophore of a CBR has not yet been elucidated, but point-mutation studies have identified over 20 amino acid residues that impart CBR specificity for ligand recognition and/or signal transduction. Twenty point-mutation studies were used to construct a CBR functionality matrix. Sixteen putative CBR homologs were then mapped over the matrix. Several putative homologs did not hold up to this analysis: human GPR3, GPR6, GPR12, and Caenorhabditis elegans C02H7.2 expressed a series of crippling substitutions in the matrix, strongly suggesting they do not encode functional CBRs. Mapping the contested leech (Hirudo medicinalis) CBR sequence suggests that it encodes a functional CB1; it expresses fewer substitutions than the sea squirt (Ciona intestinalis) CB1 sequence. Mapping a putative CB2 ortholog in the puffer fish (Fugu rubripes T012234) suggests it may encode a CBR other than CB2. These findings are consistent with the lack of experimental data proving these putative CBRs have affinity for cannabinoid ligands. Matrix analysis also reveals that SR144528, a 'CB2-specific' synthetic antagonist, has affinity for non-mammalian CB1 receptors, and that L3.45 appears to be CB2-specific, its cognate in CB1 receptors is F3.45. In conclusion, functional mapping, utilizing point-mutation studies, may improve the specificity of homology screening performed by sequence alignment search engines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M McPartland
- GW Pharmaceuticals, Porton Down Science Park, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|