Similar response to simvastatin in patients heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolemia with mRNA negative and mRNA positive mutations

Influence of the LDL-receptor genotype on statin response in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: insights from the Canadian FH Registry

BACKGROUND

Whether LDL receptor (LDLR) residual activity influences the LDL-lowering effect of statins in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) remains unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the LDLR genotype and statin-induced LDL-C reductions in HeFH.

METHODS

A total of 615 individuals with HeFH (receptor defective (RD) genotype, n=226; receptor negative (RN) genotype, n=389) from 7 lipid clinics across Canada who initiated statin monotherapy were included in this retrospective longitudinal study. Statin-induced reductions in LDL-C among individuals with RD and RN genotypes were compared using linear models.

RESULTS

There were 334 women and 281 men with a mean untreated LDL-C concentrations of 6.97 ± 1.65 mmol/L. Untreated and on-statin LDL-C levels where higher among patients with a RN genotype [Untreated: RN: 7.24 (95% CI: 6.98, 7.50) mmol/L vs. RD: 6.70 (95% CI: 6.41, 6.98) mmol/L; P=0.0002; on-statin: RN: 4.50 (95% CI: 4.31, 4.70) vs. RD: 4.05 (95% CI: 3.84, 4.26) mmol/L; P=0.0004)]. After adjustments for age, sex, smoking status, untreated LDL-C concentrations and statin type and dose as well as the clinic where the patients were treated, the LDL-C lowering effect of statins was significantly weaker for individuals with a RN mutation compared with individuals with a RD mutation [RN: -31.1% (95% CI: (-34.7, -27.4) vs. RD: -36.5% (95% CI: -40.4, -32.6); P<0.0001]. The LDLR genotype was the strongest non-modifiable independent correlate of statin-induced LDL-C reductions (R²=2.3%; P=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The LDLR genotype is significantly associated with statin-induced reductions in LDL-C concentrations in HeFH.

Higher Responsiveness to Rosuvastatin in Polygenic versus Monogenic Hypercholesterolaemia: A Propensity Score Analysis

Background: The monogenic defect in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is detected in ∼40% of cases. The majority of mutation-negative patients have a polygenic cause of high LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C). We sought to investigate whether the underlying monogenic or polygenic defect is associated with the response to rosuvastatin.

METHODS

FH Individuals were tested for mutations in LDLR and APOB genes. A previously established LDL-C-specific polygenic risk score (PRS) was used to examine the possibility of polygenic hypercholesterolemia in mutation-negative patients. All of the patients received rosuvastatin and they were followed for 8 ± 2 months. A propensity score analysis was performed to evaluate the variables associated with the response to treatment.

RESULTS

Monogenic subjects had higher mean (±SD) baseline LDL-C when compared to polygenic (7.6 ± 1.5 mmol/L vs. 6.2 ± 1.2 mmol/L; p < 0.001). Adjusted model showed a lower percentage of change in LDL-C after rosuvastatin treatment in monogenic patients vs. polygenic subjects (45.9% vs. 55.4%, p < 0.001). The probability of achieving LDL-C targets in monogenic FH was lower than in polygenic subjects (0.075 vs. 0.245, p = 0.004). Polygenic patients were more likely to achieve LDL-C goals, as compared to those monogenic (OR 3.28; 95% CI: 1.23-8.72).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate an essentially higher responsiveness to rosuvastatin in FH patients with a polygenic cause, as compared to those carrying monogenic mutations.

Type of LDLR mutation and the pharmacogenetics of familial hypercholesterolemia treatment

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant disease mainly caused by mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene. FH patients present a wide variability regarding response to drugs and they are usually undertreated. Here, we review studies that evaluated the association between the type of LDLR mutation and the response to lipid-lowering therapy. The main findings were that patients with a null LDLR mutation had: higher baseline LDL-C, higher LDL-C after drug therapy, lower proportion of patients within the LDL-C target value and higher frequencies of CVD. Thus, we conclude that FH patients harboring a null mutation have a trend to an increased risk, even if diagnosis is early established and lipid-lowering treatment instituted. It is suggested that these individuals may benefit from the use of newly approved lipid-lowering agents.

Hypolipidemic treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a lifelong challenge

In familial hypercholesterolemia, a defect in low-density lipoprotein receptors causes lifelong two- to threefold elevations in serum low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels. This leads to early atherosclerotic changes in infancy. Lifelong hypolipidemic treatment that can be started at a young age is thus greatly needed. Early diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia is important, and improved DNA tests for low-density lipoprotein receptor mutations have made it possible to carry out diagnosis at birth. A low saturated-fat, low cholesterol diet can be safely started at 7 months of age. This can be accompanied by dietary stanol esters from 2 years of age. At the age of 10, statin treatment can be safely started. In adults, more aggressive hypolipidemic treatment is required in order to reach the treatment goal for serum low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels less than 2.5 mmol/l. This can be achieved by using high doses of statin, or preferably by combining a statin with resin or ezetimibe (Zeita), Merck and Shering-Plough Pharmaceuticals). Once started, treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia is lifelong.

Presence and type of low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) mutation influences the lipid profile and response to lipid-lowering therapy in Brazilian patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

OBJECTIVES

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant disease caused mainly by LDLR mutations. This study assessed the influence of the presence and type of LDLR mutation on lipid profile and the response to lipid-lowering therapy in Brazilian patients with heterozygous FH.

METHODS

For 14 ± 3 months, 156 patients with heterozygous FH receiving atorvastatin were followed. Coding sequences of the LDLR gene were bidirectionally sequenced, and the type of LDLR mutations were classified according to their probable functional class.

RESULTS

The frequencies of the types of LDLR mutations were: null-mutation (n = 40, 25.6%), defective-mutation (n = 59, 37.8%), and without an identified mutation (n = 57, 36.6%). Baseline total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were higher in patients carrying a null mutation (9.9 ± 1.9 mmol/L, 7.9 ± 1.7 mmol/L), compared to those with a defective (8.9 ± 2.2 mmol/L, 7.0 ± 2.0 mmol/L), or no mutation (7.9 ± 1.9 mmol/L, 5.8 ± 1.9 mmol/L) (p < 0.001). After treatment, the proportion of patients attaining an LDL-C<3.4 mmol/L was significantly different among groups: null (22.5%), defective (27.1%), and without mutations (47.4%) (p = 0.02). The presence of LDLR mutations was independently associated with higher odds of not achieving the LDL-C cut-off (OR 9.07, 95% CI 1.41-58.16, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that the presence and type of LDLR mutations influence lipid profile and response to lipid-lowering therapy in Brazilian patients with heterozygous FH. Thus, more intensive care with pharmacological therapeutics should be performed in patients who have a molecular analysis indicating the presence of a LDLR mutation.

Optimal management of familial hypercholesterolemia: treatment and management strategies

Familial hypercholesterolemia is an autosomally dominant disorder caused by various mutations in low-density lipoprotein receptor genes. This will lead to elevated levels of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, which may in turn lead to premature coronary atherosclerosis and cardiac-related death. The symptoms are more severe in the homozygous type of the disease. Different options for the treatment of affected patients are now available. Diet therapy, pharmacologic therapy, lipid apheresis, and liver transplantation are among the various treatments. We clinically review the treatment and management strategies for the disease in order to shed light on the optimal management of familial hypercholesterolemia.

Effect of ezetimibe coadministered with statins in genotype-confirmed heterozygous FH patients

We investigated the effect of statins and statins plus ezetimibe in 65 FH heterozygotes carrying LDLR-defective or LDLR-negative mutations as well as the effect of ezetimibe monotherapy in 50 hypercholesterolemic (HCH) patients intolerant to statins. PCSK9 and NPC1L1 genes were analysed to assess the role of genetic variants in response to therapy. In FH patients combined therapy reduced LDL-C by 57%, irrespective of the type of LDLR mutation. The additional decrease of plasma LDL-C induced by ezetimibe showed wide inter-individual variability (from -39% to -4.7%) and was negatively correlated with percent LDL-C decrease due to statin alone (r=-0.713, P<0.001). The variable response to statins was not due to PCSK9 gene variants associated with statin hyper-sensitivity. The highest response to ezetimibe was observed in a carrier of R174H substitution in NPC1L1, which had been found to be associated with high cholesterol absorption. In HCH patients, ezetimibe monotherapy induced a variable decrease of plasma LDL-C (from -47.7% to -13.4%). To investigate this variability, we sequenced NPC1L1 gene in patients with the highest and the lowest response to ezetimibe. This analysis showed a higher prevalence of the G allele of the c.816 C>G polymorphism (L272L) in hyper-responders, an observation confirmed also in FH patients hyper-responders to ezetimibe. In both FH and HCH patients, the G allele carriers tended to have a higher LDL-C reduction in response to ezetimibe. These observations suggest that in FH heterozygotes LDL-C reduction following combined therapy reflects a complex interplay between hepatic synthesis and intestinal absorption of cholesterol.

Rational approach to the treatment for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in childhood and adolescence: a review

Atherosclerosis represents a disease that begins in childhood and in which LDL cholesterol plays a pivotal role for the development of the pathology. Children and adolescents with high cholesterol levels are more likely than their peers to present cholesterol elevation as adults. The identification of genetic dyslipidemias associated with premature cardiovascular disease is crucial during childhood to delay or prevent the atherosclerotic process. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hypercholesterolemia during pediatric age are available from the National Cholesterol Education Program. A heart-healthy diet should begin at the age of 2 yr and a large number of studies have demonstrated no adverse effects on nutritional status, growth, pubertal development, and psychological aspects in children and adolescents limiting total and saturated fat intake. Pharmacotherapy should be considered in children over 10 yr of age when LDL cholesterol concentrations remain very high despite severe dietary therapy, especially when multiple risk factors are present. The only lipid-lowering drugs recommended up to now for childhood and adolescence are resins reported to be effective and well tolerated, although compliance is very poor because of unpalatability. The use of statins is increasing and seems to be effective and safe in children, even if studies enrolled a small number of patients and evaluated efficacy and safety for short-term periods. Recently, an interesting drug represented by ezetimibe has been found that may provide cholesterol-lowering additive to that reached with statin treatment. This review provides an update on recent advances in the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of familial hypercholesterolemia during pediatric age and adolescence.

Low-density lipoprotein receptor genotype and response to pravastatin in children with familial hypercholesterolemia: substudy of an intima-media thickness trial

BACKGROUND

The lipid-lowering effects of statin therapy show considerable interindividual variation in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Whether the type of LDL receptor mutation predicts the response to statin treatment is not yet established. We analyzed the relationship between LDL receptor genotype and response to pravastatin treatment in children with FH using carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) to measure efficacy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 2-year trial with pravastatin, 193 children had genetically confirmed FH and were included in the present substudy. At baseline, children with null alleles had higher LDL cholesterol levels (difference, 0.94+/-0.19 mmol/L [SEM]; P<0.001) and a greater carotid IMT (difference, 0.019+/-0.01 mm; P=0.02) compared with children with receptor-defective mutations. The decrease in carotid IMT during the trial was not significantly different in children with null alleles and receptor-defective mutations (0.018+/-0.012 and 0.012+/-0.010 mm; 2-way ANCOVA, P=0.7). After 2 years of treatment, the children with null alleles continued to have greater carotid IMT than children with receptor-defective mutations (difference, 0.016+/-0.01 mm; P=0.02). LDL cholesterol lowering tended to be less in carriers of null alleles compared with carriers of receptor-defective mutations (1.30+/-0.25 and 1.85+/-0.20 mmol/L; 2-way ANCOVA, P=0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

In FH children, we found that the null allele genotype was associated with a greater carotid IMT, higher LDL cholesterol levels, and a nonsignificant tendency to attenuated LDL cholesterol lowering compared with receptor-defective mutations. Null alleles identify FH patients at the highest cardiovascular disease risk who may benefit from more aggressive treatment started in childhood.

Genetic and environmental factors affecting the response to statin therapy in patients with molecularly defined familial hypercholesterolaemia

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is the most common inherited metabolic disease characterized by elevated serum levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and ischaemic heart disease early in life. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to prevent premature atherosclerosis in FH patients. The aim of our study was the evaluation of the effects of genetic [class of the LDL receptor (LDLR) gene mutation, apolipoprotein (apo)E, apoA-IV and cholesterol ester transfer protein gene polymorphisms] and environmental factors (age, sex, smoking habit and body mass index) on the lipid-lowering response to statin therapy in patients with molecularly defined FH. Atorvastatin 20 mg/day was prescribed in 49 patients with heterozygous FH. The lipid profile was examined before and after 12 weeks of therapy. Statin therapy resulted in a decrease of 37% and 36% in LDL-C and apoB levels, respectively. The study population was then divided into 2 groups according to the class of the LDLR mutation [patients sharing a class V mutation (the G1775A mutation, n=21) and patients sharing class II mutations (the G1646A and the C858A mutations, n=28)]. In both groups, the percentage decrement in LDL-C and apoB levels were correlated with the initial LDL-C and apoB levels, respectively. The class of the LDLR mutation affected the LDL-C and apoB-lowering response of heterozygous FH patients to statin therapy. In detail, heterozygotes sharing a class V mutation of the LDLR showed a higher percentage decrement in LDL-C and apoB levels after atorvastatin administration compared to patients sharing class II mutations (49+/-9% versus 34+/-9%, P=0.001 for LDL-C and 42+/-16% versus 35+/-20%, P=0.001 for apoB). The influence of the classes of the LDLR gene mutations on the change of LDL-C and apoB levels to atorvastatin was still significant in a multivariate analysis. None of the other genetic and environmental factors studied affected the lipid-lowering response to atorvastatin therapy in patients with heterozygous FH in a multivariate analysis. Our data indicate that the class of the LDLR gene mutation affects the LDL-C and apoB-lowering response of heterozygous FH patients to statin therapy. Specifically, patients with a class V mutation exhibit higher percentage decrease in LDL-C and apoB levels after statin therapy compared to patients sharing class II mutations.

Benefits and risks assessment of simvastatin in familial hypercholesterolaemia

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a frequent inherited monogenic disorder, associated with premature coronary artery disease. Life expectancy of FH patients is reduced by 15 - 30 years unless they are adequately treated with lipid-lowering therapy. Patients with this disorder need long-term drug therapy and the selection of treatment should be strongly based on its long-term safety and tolerability. The introduction of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors has changed the treatment of FH. Simvastatin 40 - 80 mg/day effectively reduces serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and also reduces triglycerides with a modest rise in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Other potentially important effects, such as improvement of endothelial function, reduction of LDL oxidation and vascular inflammation, have been associated with simvastatin therapy in FH. In addition, simvastatin has been shown to abolish the progression, and even facilitate the regression of existing human atherosclerotic lesions. The safety and tolerability of simvastatin is clearly highlighted by the low rate of therapy discontinuation observed in several population-based clinical trials. Asymptomatic elevations in liver transaminase levels and myopathy are uncommon. The efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin at doses up to 80 mg/day are well-established, as well as its cost-effectiveness in the management of FH patients.

Pharmacogenetics of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: exploring the potential for genotype-based individualization of coronary heart disease management

Despite the benefit of statin therapy in the prevention of coronary heart disease, a considerable inter-individual variation exists in its response. It is well recognized that genetic variation can contribute to differences in drug disposition and, consequently, clinical efficacy at the population level. Pharmacogenetics, exploring genetic polymorphisms that influence response to drug therapy, may one day allow the clinician to customize treatment strategies for patients in order to improve the success rate of drug therapies. To date, 41 studies have investigated the relationships between common genetic variants and response to statin therapy in terms of lipid effects and clinical outcomes; 16 candidate genes involved in lipoprotein metabolism and 3 in pharmacokinetics. APOE is the most extensively studied locus, and absolute difference in LDL cholesterol reduction across genotypes remained 3-6%. Moreover, none of the associations was striking enough to justify genetic analysis in clinical practice. Reported data have suggested that larger studies (>1000 participants) or combination analyses with >2 different polymorphisms would enable us to find clinically or biologically meaningful difference, which could be assumed as >10% absolute difference, and that genes influencing cholesterol biosynthesis in the liver, such as ABCG5/G8, CYP7A1, HMGCR, would be good candidates for future studies.

Pharmacogenetics of lipid diseases

The genetic basis for most of the rare lipid monogenic disorders have been elucidated, but the challenge remains in determining the combination of genes that contribute to the genetic variability in lipid levels in the general population; this has been estimated to be in the range of 40-60 per cent of the total variability. Therefore, the effect of common polymorphisms on lipid phenotypes will be greatly modulated by gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. This approach can also be used to characterise the individuality of the response to lipid-lowering therapies, whether using drugs (pharmacogenetics) or dietary interventions (nutrigenetics). In this regard, multiple studies have already described significant interactions between candidate genes for lipid and drug metabolism that modulate therapeutic response--although the outcomes of these studies have been controversial and call for more rigorous experimental design and analytical approaches. Once solid evidence about the predictive value of genetic panels is obtained, risk and therapeutic algorithms can begin to be generated that should provide an accurate measure of genetic predisposition, as well as targeted behavioural modifications or drugs of choice and personalised dosages of these drugs.

Effect of low-density lipoprotein receptor mutation on lipoproteins and cardiovascular disease risk: a parent-offspring study

Studies on the clinical consequences of different low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor genotypes in adult patients have yielded conflicting results. We hypothesized that children with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) provide a better model to perform genotype-phenotype analyses than adults. We tested this hypothesis and assessed the effect of LDL receptor genotypes on lipoprotein levels and on parental risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a pediatric FH cohort. We identified 75 different LDL receptor mutations in 645 children with heterozygous FH; in these children, null alleles were clearly associated with more elevated LDL cholesterol levels compared to receptor-defective mutations. Familial factors explained 50.4% of the variation in LDL cholesterol levels of this pediatric cohort compared to only 9.5% in adults. Parental CVD risk was not significantly different between carriers of null alleles and receptor-defective mutations (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.76-1.95; p=0.4). The N543H/2393del9 mutation was associated with a less deteriorated lipid profile and the parents had less often CVD relative to parents with other mutations (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20-0.78; p=0.008). We could confirm that children with FH provide a better model to perform genotype-phenotype analyses. In particular, children with null alleles had significantly more elevated LDL cholesterol levels than carriers of other alleles but this was not associated with higher risk of CVD in the parents. Nonetheless, a specific LDL receptor mutation was associated with less deteriorated lipoprotein levels and a milder CVD risk.

Benefits and risks of simvastatin in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia

Familial hypercholesterolaemia is a frequent, inherited, monogenic disorder, associated with accelerated development of atherosclerotic disease leading to coronary artery disease. Life expectancy of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia is reduced by 15-30 years unless they are adequately treated with lipid-lowering therapy. Given the chronic nature of this disease, the selection of a therapeutic approach should be strongly based on its long-term safety and tolerability. The introduction of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors has revolutionised the treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia. Simvastatin 40-80 mg/day effectively reduces serum low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels. Furthermore, simvastatin reduces triglycerides and mildly raises high density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels. In addition to the hypolipidaemic effect, other potentially important effects, such as improvement of endothelial function and reduction of LDL oxidation and vascular inflammation, have been associated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy. Simvastatin has also been shown to abolish the progression, and even facilitate the regression, of existing human atherosclerotic lesions. The good safety and tolerability profile of simvastatin is clearly highlighted by the low rate of therapy discontinuation observed in several population-based clinical trials. The most common adverse events leading to the discontinuation of therapy are gastrointestinal upset and headache. Asymptomatic elevations in liver transaminase levels and myopathy are uncommon. The overwhelming clinical evidence regarding the long-term use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia together with the long-term safety data (particularly relating to simvastatin) provide support for the use of this drug as a first-line agent when pharmacological treatment is indicated. Early intervention with simvastatin treatment can be successfully implemented with favourable economic benefits.

Influence of LDL receptor gene mutations and the R3500Q mutation of the apoB gene on lipoprotein phenotype of familial hypercholesterolemic patients from a South European population

Few data are available on genotype-phenotype interactions among familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients in South European populations and there are no data about the influence of R3500Q mutation on lipoprotein phenotype compared to low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) mutations. The objective of the study is to analyze the influence of mutations in the LDLR and apolipoprotein B (apoB) genes on lipoprotein phenotype among subjects clinically diagnosed of FH living in East Spain. In all, 113 FH index patients and 100 affected relatives were studied. Genetic diagnosis was carried out following a protocol based on Southern blot and PCR-SSCP analysis. A total of 118 FH subjects could be classified into three groups according to the type of LDLR mutations (null mutations, missense mutations affecting the ligand binding 3-5 repeat, and missense mutations outside this domain). In addition, the lipoprotein phenotype of these FH groups was compared with 19 heterozygous subjects with familial ligand-defective apoB (FDB), due to R3500Q mutation. FH patients carrying missense mutations affecting the ligand binding repeat 3-5 showed total and LDL cholesterol levels significantly higher than FH patients with missense mutations in other LDLR domains or FDB patients. FH subjects carrying null mutations showed lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol plasma values compared to FH carrying missense mutations. FDB subjects showed the lowest total and LDL cholesterol plasma values. In conclusion, the type of LDLR gene mutation and R3500Q mutation influences the lipoprotein phenotype of FH population from East Spain.

The apolipoprotein epsilon4 allele confers additional risk in children with familial hypercholesterolemia

Children with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) exhibit substantial variance of LDL cholesterol. In previous studies, family members of children with FH were included, which may have influenced results. To avoid such bias, we studied phenotype in 450 unrelated children with FH and in 154 affected sib-pairs. In known families with classical FH, diagnosis was based on plasma LDL cholesterol above the age- and gender-specific 95th percentile. Girls had 0.47 +/- 0.15 mmol/L higher LDL cholesterol, compared with boys (p = 0.002). Also in girls, HDL cholesterol increased by 0.07 +/- 0.03 mmol/L per 5 y (pfor trend = 0.005); this age effect was not observed in boys. The distribution of apolipoprotein (apo) E genotypes was not significantly different between probands, their paired affected siblings, or a Dutch control population. Carriers with or without one epsilon4 allele had similar LDL and HDL cholesterol levels. Within the affected sib-pairs, the epsilon4 allele explained 72.4% of the variance of HDL cholesterol levels (-0.15 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval -0.24 to -0.05, p = 0.003). The effect of apoE4 on HDL cholesterol differed with an analysis based on probands or on affected sib-pairs. The affected sib-pair model used adjustment for shared environment, type of LDL receptor gene mutation, and a proportion of additional genetic factors and may, therefore, be more accurate in estimating effects of risk factors on complex traits. We conclude that the epsilon4 allele was associated with lower HDL cholesterol levels in an affected sib-pair analysis, which strongly suggests that apoE4 influences HDL cholesterol levels in FH children. Moreover, the strong association suggests that apoE4 carries an additional disadvantage for FH children.

DNA testing for familial hypercholesterolemia: improving disease recognition and patient care

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide and, like most chronic diseases, it has major genetic and environmental components. Among patients with coronary heart disease onset before the age of 55, about 5% of cases are attributable to heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a disease following autosomal dominant inheritance. About 50% of individuals with FH die before the age of 60 due to myocardial infarction. The frequency of FH is estimated to be 1 : 500. FH is related to mutations in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol LDL-receptor gene and apolipoprotein B (apoB) gene. The identification of individuals with FH has been based on lipid levels and segregation of lipid levels within the family. However, phenotypes are overlapping and family history is not always informative. Therefore, a DNA-based genetic test for FH appears to offer the best alternative. The DNA test gives a simple yes/no answer. The FH test is a definitive tool for the identification of affected family members. The approach of targeted family genetic screening to find new patients is faster and more reliable compared with a biochemical form of screening. Early identification and efficient treatment of such patients is important and highly cost effective. There is evidence to suggest that the nature of the LDL-receptor (LDLR) mutation influences the degree of cholesterol lowering achieved by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins). The observed differences in the LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) responses to these drugs among the various LDLR gene mutations are not yet completely understood. The relationships shown between LDLR mutation types and lipid levels, and the response of lipid levels to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor treatment, will have to be investigated within the framework of pharmacogenetic studies. The variables, which are important in determining the overall atherosclerosis risk, are the result of combined activity in a dynamic network of numerous genes and environment. Candidate genes for atherosclerosis need to be further tested and validated. Future research should be directed at determining the significance of such targets, which patients with FH are at particularly high risk of premature cardiovascular disease, and which environmental factors are effective in modulating this risk. Genetics-based diagnostics will complement identification of FH while improving cardiovascular risk prediction, prevention of disease and treatment efficacy.

Low-density lipoprotein receptor gene mutations and cardiovascular risk in a large genetic cascade screening population

BACKGROUND

A large cohort of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), free from selection for cardiovascular disease (CVD), and their unaffected relatives was collected by genetic cascade screening and examined for the influence of different mutations of the LDL receptor gene on lipoprotein levels and the risk of CVD. Multivariate analyses with adjustment for age, sex, and specific family ties were performed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Significant variation of LDL levels was observed among 399 patients with FH with different mutations. Null alleles were associated with more severely elevated LDL cholesterol, whereas the frequent N543H/2393del9 mutation led to less elevated LDL cholesterol. The type of mutation did not influence HDL cholesterol levels. Patients with FH had CVD 8.5 times more often compared with their unaffected relatives (RR, 8.54; 95% CI, 5.29 to 13.80). The N543H/2393del9 mutation was associated with a smaller increase of risk compared with other mutations (P<0.0001). After exclusion of families with the N543H/2393del9 mutation, null alleles and other allele mutations no longer differed with regard to LDL cholesterol levels and CVD risk.

CONCLUSIONS

LDL receptor mutations only partly contributed to the variation of LDL cholesterol levels and cardiovascular burden in FH. Additional, so far unidentified, familial risk factors must underlie the differences of CVD risk, most likely independent of lipids and lipoproteins.

Genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia in a South European outbreed population: influence of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene mutations on treatment response to simvastatin in total, LDL, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

The aims of this study were to examine the presence of mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene among subjects clinically diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia and to analyze whether the molecular diagnosis helps to predict the response to simvastatin treatment in our familial hypercholesterolemia population. Fifty-five probands and 128 related subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia were studied. Genetic diagnosis was carried out following a three-step protocol based on Southern blot and PCR-single strand conformational polymorphism analysis. A randomized clinical trial with simvastatin was conducted in 42 genetically diagnosed subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia classified as carriers of null mutations (n = 22) and of defective mutations (n = 20). A mutation-causing familial hypercholesterolemia was identified in 46 probands (84%). In 41 of them (89%), a total of 28 point mutations were detected, 13 of which have not been previously described. The remaining five probands (11%) were carriers of large rearrangements. Familial hypercholesterolemia with null mutations showed a poor response to simvastatin treatment. The mean percentage reduction of plasma total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in these subjects were significantly lower (24.8 +/- 10.3 vs. 34.8 +/- 10.9, P = 0.04 and 30.0 +/- 39.8 vs. 46.1 +/- 18.2, P = 0.02, respectively) than in subjects with defective mutations. Baseline and posttreatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol plasma values were significantly lower in subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia with null mutations (P < 0.001). In an outbreed Caucasian population, a three-step protocol for genetic screening detected a mutation in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene in a high percentage (84%) of subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia. Subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia with null mutations (class I) showed lower plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol values and a poor low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to simvastatin treatment.

LDL-receptor gene mutations and the hypocholesterolemic response to statin therapy

Studies of the cholesterol lowering effect of statin therapy as a function of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-receptor mutation type have not produced a clear picture, possibly because they included patients with several different kinds of LDL-receptor mutations. We studied the response to treatment with fluvastatin in 28 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia as a result of a receptor-negative mutation (Trp23-stop) and in 30 patients with a receptor-binding defective mutation (Trp66-Gly) to test the hypothesis that response to treatment depends on the type of mutation. Patients were randomized to 12 weeks of treatment with fluvastatin 40 mg daily and 12 weeks of placebo treatment, preceded by a placebo run-in period of 8 weeks in a double-blind, cross-over design. Untreated plasma concentrations of lipids and lipoproteins were similar in the two groups of patients. Plasma cholesterol and LDL cholesterol response to therapy tended to be less marked in receptor-binding defective patients, but the differences were not statistically significant. A tabulation of the results of the present and earlier studies suggests that differences in treatment response as an apparent function of LDL-receptor gene mutational type occur mainly in populations with recent genetic admixture (<400 years). In such populations, persons with the same mutation in the LDL-receptor gene are more likely to share other but undetermined genetic variations affecting the pharmacology of statins.

Determinants of Variable Response to Statin Treatment in Patients With Refractory Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Abstract —Interindividual variability in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C) response during treatment with statins is well documented but poorly understood. To investigate potential metabolic and genetic determinants of statin responsiveness, 19 patients with refractory heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia were sequentially treated with placebo, atorvastatin (10 mg/d), bile acid sequestrant, and the 2 combined, each for 4 weeks. Levels of LDL-C, mevalonic acid (MVA), 7-α-OH-4-cholesten-3-one, and leukocyte LDL receptor and hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase mRNA were determined after each treatment period. Atorvastatin (10 mg/d) reduced LDL-C by an overall mean of 32.5%. Above-average responders (ΔLDL-C −39.5%) had higher basal MVA levels (34.4±6.1 μmol/L) than did below-average responders (ΔLDL-C −23.6%, P <0.02; basal MVA 26.3±6.1 μmol/L, P <0.01). Fewer good responders compared with the poor responders had an apolipoprotein E4 allele (3 of 11 versus 6 of 8, respectively; P <0.05). There were no baseline differences between them in 7-α-OH-4-cholesten-3-one, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase mRNA, or LDL receptor mRNA, but the latter increased in the good responders on combination therapy ( P <0.05). Severe mutations were not more common in poor than in good responders. We conclude that poor responders to statins have a low basal rate of cholesterol synthesis that may be secondary to a genetically determined increase in cholesterol absorption, possibly mediated by apolipoprotein E4. If so, statin responsiveness could be enhanced by reducing dietary cholesterol intake or inhibiting absorption.

[Influence of FH Valencia 1 and 2 mutations of the LDL receptor gene on the response to simvastatin in subjects with molecularly defined heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in Spain]

BACKGROUND

To analyse whether the molecular diagnosis in FH patients is useful to predict the response to treatment with simvastatin in a south European population.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD

A randomised clinical trial with no control group, with 20 mg/day of simvastatin was conducted in 27 genetically diagnosed FH subjects (11 male) from 8 FH families, randomly selected from 30 FH families with a molecular diagnosis. Clinical features and lipid parameters at baseline and after simvastatin treatment were compared between subjects classified as null mutations (FH Valencia 1 and 2; n = 11) and defective mutations (n = 16).

RESULTS

FH with null mutations (FH Valencia 1 and 2) have a poor response to simvastatin treatment. The mean reduction of plasma LDLc levels in subjects with null mutations were significantly lower (32.6% [9.5] vs 42.8% [12.2]; p = 0.03) than in subjects with defective mutations. Baseline and after treatment plasma HDLc values were also significantly lower in FH group with null mutations. No statistically significant differences were found at baseline, after treatment and in the response to treatment between males and females.

CONCLUSIONS

FH subjects with null alleles (FH Valencia 1 and 2) showed a poor response to simvastatin treatment. The type of LDL receptor gene mutation could predict the response to simvastatin in our south European FH population.

Additional risk factors influence excess mortality in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

Life expectancy of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia is decreased. Some untreated patients reach a normal life span and, therefore, additional risk factors and the type of mutation in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene are likely to influence the clinical outcome. We determined all cause mortality in kindreds with the disorder, who were untreated, in order to study (a) additional risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) and (b) the types of LDL receptor gene mutations that may contribute to a poor prognosis. The mortality in all 855 first-degree relatives of 113 unrelated patients was compared to the Dutch population after standardisation for age, gender, and calendar period. Analyses restricted to affected relatives could have underestimated the mortality risk due to lack of information about severe cases, who died prematurely. Therefore, all first-degree relatives were analysed and as a result the standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) exhibit only 50% of the excess mortality from familial hypercholesterolaemia. We observed 190 deaths in 32048 person-years leading to an overall SMR of 1.34 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1. 16-1.55, P=0.001). High excess mortality occurred in males between age 40 and 54 (SMR 2.34, 95% CI 1.60-3.31, P<0.001). The excess mortality decreased during the last decades. This change of mortality over calendar time shows that additional risk factors modulate the mortality from the disorder. The SMR of 62 families referred with premature CAD was 1.62 (95% CI 1.32-1.93, P<0.001) and the SMR was 1.10 (95% CI 0.86-1.34, P=0.4) in 51 families without premature CAD. The mortality risk of kindreds with null alleles was similar to that of kindreds with other mutations. In conclusion, the burden of the untreated disorder occurred mainly among middle-aged males and was not influenced by the type of mutation. Additional risk factors increased excess mortality significantly and are highlighted by the presence of premature CAD among first-degree relatives. This underscores the need for active identification of all hypercholesterolaemic relatives of such patients.

The type of mutation in the low density lipoprotein receptor gene influences the cholesterol-lowering response of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

In a genetically heterogeneous group of 109 patients with a clinical diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), the influence of gender, apolipoprotein (apo) E genotype and the type of molecular defect in the LDL-receptor (LDLR) gene on the reduction of plasma LDL-cholesterol levels to treatment with a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (simvastatin) were studied. Response was determined as the percentage fall in LDL-cholesterol from untreated levels and as the proportion of patients where levels fell below 4.9 or 4.1 mmol/l. Of the patients, 86 individuals had tendon xanthomata (TX+) and a diagnosis of 'definite' FH and these individuals presented with a significantly higher untreated LDL-cholesterol compared to the 23 individuals who did not have xanthomas (TX-) and a diagnosis of 'probable' FH (8.14+/-0.19 vs. 6.81+/-0.25, P= 0.001). Overall, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor doses of 10, 20 or 40 mg/day resulted in a significant fall of LDL-cholesterol levels of 29, 39 and 49%, but at all doses those with TX had significantly higher levels than those without, and significantly fewer TX + patients achieved LDL-cholesterol levels below 4.9 or 4.1 mmol/l than the TX - group (P < 0.05 at each dose). In the TX+ group the response to treatment was of similar magnitude in men and women and in patients with different apoE genotype. In the 'probable' FH probands only three mutations were identified (detection rate 13%), one in the LDLR gene and two in the APOB gene, a detection rate significantly lower (P= 0.02) than in the 'definite' FH probands where 28 mutations were detected (detection rate 37%). In the TX + patients where no mutation was detected, treatment resulted in a greater proportion achieving LDL-cholesterol levels below 4.9 and 4.1 mmol/l compared to those with any LDLR mutation, this difference was close to statistical significance at the 4.9 mmol/l threshold at 10 mg/day (41 vs. 13%, P = 0.058). For the 14 patients with an LDLR mutation that was predicted to be 'severe', fewer achieved LDL-cholesterol levels below 4.9 or 4.1 mmol/l at each dosage compared to the 16 individuals with 'mild' mutations, and this difference was statistically significant at the maximal dosage of 40 mg/day (P = 0.018). Thus although characterisation of the molecular defect in FH patients may not be relevant to their immediate clinical management, those with a particular mutation may need more aggressive lipid-lowering treatment to reach LDL-cholesterol levels recommended to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD).

Genotype/phenotype correlations in familial hypercholesterolaemia

It is now possible to identify the specific gene defect in the majority of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. A potential benefit of this knowledge, in addition to helping with family screens, is to be able to predict the future clinical course. In order to do this, detailed genotype/phenotype correlation studies are required.