Apolipoprotein E polymorphism has no independent effect on plasma levels of lipoprotein(a)

Consensus document on Lipoprotein(a) from the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis (SISA)

AIMS

In view of the consolidating evidence on the causal role of Lp(a) in cardiovascular disease, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis (SISA) has assembled a consensus on Lp(a) genetics and epidemiology, together with recommendations for its measurement and current and emerging therapeutic approaches to reduce its plasma levels. Data on the Italian population are also provided.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Lp(a) is constituted by one apo(a) molecule and a lipoprotein closely resembling to a low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Its similarity with an LDL, together with its ability to carry oxidized phospholipids are considered the two main features making Lp(a) harmful for cardiovascular health. Plasma Lp(a) concentrations vary over about 1000 folds in humans and are genetically determined, thus they are quite stable in any individual. Mendelian Randomization studies have suggested a causal role of Lp(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve stenosis and observational studies indicate a linear direct correlation between cardiovascular disease and Lp(a) plasma levels. Lp(a) measurement is strongly recommended once in a patient's lifetime, particularly in FH subjects, but also as part of the initial lipid screening to assess cardiovascular risk. The apo(a) size polymorphism represents a challenge for Lp(a) measurement in plasma, but new strategies are overcoming these difficulties. A reduction of Lp(a) levels can be currently attained only by plasma apheresis and, moderately, with PCSK9 inhibitor treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Awaiting the approval of selective Lp(a)-lowering drugs, an intensive management of the other risk factors for individuals with elevated Lp(a) levels is strongly recommended.

Genetic and Mechanistic Insights into the Modulation of Circulating Lipoprotein (a) Concentration by Apolipoprotein E Isoforms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a highly atherogenic lipoprotein species. A unique feature of Lp(a) is the strong genetic determination of its concentration. The LPA gene is responsible for up to 90% of the variance in Lp(a), but other genes also have an impact.

RECENT FINDINGS

Genome-wide associations studies indicate that the APOE gene, encoding apolipoprotein E (apoE), is the second most important locus modulating Lp(a) concentrations. Population studies clearly show that carriers of the apoE2 variant (ε2) display reduced Lp(a) levels, the lowest concentrations being observed in ε2/ε2 homozygotes. This genotype can lead predisposed adults to develop dysbetalipoproteinemia, a lipid disorder characterized by sharp elevations in cholesterol and triglycerides. However, dysbetalipoproteinemia does not significantly modulate circulating Lp(a). Mechanistically, apoE appears to impair the production but not the catabolism of Lp(a). These observations underline the complexity of Lp(a) metabolism and provide key insights into the pathways governing Lp(a) synthesis and secretion.

VLDL (Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein)-Apo E (Apolipoprotein E) May Influence Lp(a) (Lipoprotein [a]) Synthesis or Assembly

Objective:

To clarify the association between PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) and Lp(a) (lipoprotein [a]), we studied Lp(a) kinetics in patients with loss-of-function and gain-of-function PCSK9 mutations and in patients in whom extended-release niacin reduced Lp(a) and PCSK9 concentrations.

Approach and Results:

Six healthy controls, 9 heterozygous patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (5 with low-density lipoprotein receptor [ LDLR ] mutations and 4 with PCSK9 gain-of-function mutations) and 3 patients with heterozygous dominant-negative PCSK9 loss-of-function mutations were included in the preliminary study. Eight patients were enrolled in a second study assessing the effects of 2 g/day extended-release niacin. Apolipoprotein kinetics in VLDL (very-low-density lipoprotein), LDL (low-density lipoprotein), and Lp(a) were studied using stable isotope techniques. Plasma Lp(a) concentrations were increased in PCSK9 -gain-of-function and familial hypercholesterolemia- LDLR groups compared with controls and PCSK9 -loss-of-function groups (14±12 versus 5±4 mg/dL; P =0.04), but no change was observed in Lp(a) fractional catabolic rate. Subjects with PCSK9 -loss-of-function mutations displayed reduced apoE (apolipoprotein E) concentrations associated with a VLDL-apoE absolute production rate reduction. Lp(a) and VLDL-apoE absolute production rates were correlated ( r =0.50; P <0.05). ApoE-to-apolipoprotein (a) molar ratios in Lp(a) increased with plasma Lp(a) ( r =0.96; P <0.001) but not with PCSK9 levels. Extended-release niacin-induced reductions in Lp(a) and VLDL-apoE absolute production rate were correlated ( r =0.83; P =0.015). In contrast, PCSK9 reduction (−35%; P =0.008) was only correlated with that of VLDL-apoE absolute production rate ( r =0.79; P =0.028).

Conclusions:

VLDL-apoE production could determine Lp(a) production and/or assembly. As PCSK9 inhibitors reduce plasma apoE and Lp(a) concentrations, apoE could be the link between PCSK9 and Lp(a).

Lipid metabolism in cognitive decline and dementia

This review will focus on the current knowledge on circulating serum and plasma risk factors of cognitive decline of degenerative (Alzheimer's disease, AD) or vascular origin (vascular dementia, VaD) linked to cholesterol homeostasis and lipoprotein disturbances, i.e. total cholesterol (TC), 24S-hydroxy-cholesterol, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), or apolipoprotein E (APOE). These measures linked to lipoprotein metabolism appear to be altered in AD, VaD, or predementia syndrome relative to controls, but with contrasting results. At present, several studies have demonstrated the dependence of APOE serum levels upon the APOE genotype, nonetheless serum APOE levels seems not to be a credible risk factor or a biochemical marker for AD instead of APOE genotyping. In fact, there was no consistent association of serum or plasma apoE protein levels with the disease when controlled for APOE genotype. In addition, there are some evidence that higher Lp(a) levels could be linked with AD, although there are studies suggesting an increased presence of low molecular weight apo(a) in AD, VaD, and frontotemporal dementia, that are associated with elevated Lp(a) levels. In fact, the apo(a) gene is highly polymorphic in length due to variation in the numbers of a sequence encoding the apo(a) kringle 4 domain, and plasma levels of Lp(a) are inversely correlated with apo(a) size. Furthermore, although serum/plasma levels of TC and 24S-hydroxycholesterol are not credible diagnostic markers for AD and cognitive decline, the current evidence suggests that they may be modifiable risk/protective factors. The prevailing wisdom is that high TC is a risk factor for dementia. However, the relationship between TC and dementia may vary considerably depending on when cholesterol is measured over the life course or, alternatively, in relation to the underlying course of the disease. Several observational studies have suggested that statins, which are effective in lowering cholesterol, may reduce the risk of dementia, but the results of these reports are inconclusive. Thus, more studies with long-term follow-up and serial assessments of TC are needed to further clarify the causal relationship between cholesterol and dementia.

Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and atherosclerosis

The relationship between apolipoprotein (apo) E and vascular disease has been the subject of a considerable amount of research. However, this relationship is far from clearly defined. This deficiency appears to be due to a multitude of factors. Among these are differences in ethnicity, age (and possibly gender), diagnostic criteria, and environmental factors (eg, diet and smoking) that have contributed to the contradictory findings. Several diseases and their treatment may also influence this relationship. There are also documented interactions between apo E genotypes and other genes or vascular risk factors. One possible clinically relevant application of identifying the apo E genotype could be to assess the response to a particular drug treatment. It may also be that apo E polymorphism will become a good predictor of vascular death (eg, from myocardial infarction or stroke) rather than an indicator of the risk of developing vascular disease but without an acute ischemic event. More research is required to define the place of apo E genotyping in the management of vascular disease in its various forms. Whatever the future brings, the evaluation of apo E genotypes will need to be rapid, cheap, and technically undemanding before this investigation becomes widely available and clinically relevant.

Possible association between genetic variability at the apolipoprotein(a) locus and Alzheimer's disease in apolipoprotein E2 carriers

Apolipoprotein(a) (Apo(a)) is a glycoprotein that is linked by a disulfide bond to apolipoprotein B on low density lipoprotein particles to form lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)). High plasma levels of Lp(a) are thought to contribute directly to the development of atherosclerosis. We tested a variant (T3888P) located in the Kringle-IV region of Apo(a) in a case-control series. Overall, there were no differences between case and controls. However, in the apoE2 positive subgroup, we noticed that the mutant allele is over-represented in the cases (P=0.005). We suggest that this polymorphism and others at the Apo(a) locus be further studied in relation to Alzheimer's disease.

Apolipoprotein E polymorphism in men and women from a Spanish population: allele frequencies and influence on plasma lipids and apolipoproteins

The apolipoprotein (apo) E phenotype and its influence on plasma lipid and apolipoprotein levels were determined in men and women from a working population of Madrid, Spain. The relative frequencies of alleles epsilon(2), epsilon(3) and epsilon(4) for the study population (n=614) were 0.080, 0.842 and 0.078, respectively. In men, apo E polymorphism was associated with variations in plasma triglyceride and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) lipid levels. It was associated with the proportion of apo C-II in VLDL, and explained 5.5% of the variability in the latter parameter. In women apo E polymorphism was associated with the concentrations of plasma cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) related variables. The allelic effects were examined taking allele epsilon(3) homozygosity as reference. In men, allele epsilon(2) significantly increased VLDL triglyceride and VLDL cholesterol concentrations, and this was accompanied by an increase of the apo C-II content in these particles. Allele epsilon(4) did not show any significant influence on men's lipoproteins. In women, allele epsilon(2) lowered LDL cholesterol and apo B levels, while allele epsilon(4) increased LDL cholesterol and decreased the concentrations of HDL cholesterol, HDL phospholipid and apo A-I. These effects were essentially maintained after excluding postmenopausal women and oral contraceptive users from the analysis.

IN CONCLUSION

(1) the population of Madrid, similar to other Mediterranean populations, exhibits an underexpression of apo E4 compared to the average prevalence in Caucasians, (2) gender interacts with the effects of apo E polymorphism: in women, it influenced LDL and HDL levels, whereas in men it preferentially affected VLDL, and (3) allele epsilon(2) decreased LDL levels in women, while it increased both VLDL lipid levels and apo C-II content in men, but, in contrast to allele epsilon(4), it did not show an impact on HDL in either sex.

Lipoprotein (a) metabolism estimated by nonsteady-state kinetics

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle with an additional apolipoprotein named apo(a). The concentration of Lp(a) in plasma is determined to a large extent by the size of the apo(a) isoform. Because elevated Lp(a) concentrations in plasma are associated with risk for premature coronary heart disease it is important to determine whether variations in production or catabolism mediate differences in Lp(a) concentration. We determined metabolic parameters of Lp(a) in 17 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or severe mixed hyperlipidemia by fitting a monoexponential function to the rebound of Lp(a) plasma concentration following LDL-apheresis. In 8 of those 17 patients this was done twice following two different aphereses. Although this approach allows one to estimate metabolic parameters without the use of a tracer, it requires several major assumptions such as that apheresis itself does not change production or catabolism of Lp(a) and that Lp(a) metabolism can be described by a single compartment. One apheresis decreased Lp(a) concentration by 59.1+/-8.3%. The fractional catabolic rate (FCR) was 0.16+/-0.12 d(-1) and production rate 6.27+/-5.26 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1). However, observed (concentration before first apheresis) and predicted steady-state concentrations differed considerably (more than 20%) in 9 of 17 patients, indicating that not all assumptions were fulfilled in all patients. Production rate but not FCR was correlated with Lp(a) plasma concentration (r2 = 0.43, P = 0.004) and molecular weight of apo(a) (r2 = 0.48, P = 0.011), which confirms radiotracer experiments showing that variations in Lp(a) plasma concentrations are due to differences in production not catabolism. When parameters were estimated twice in a subgroup of eight patients, satisfactory reproducibility was observed in six patients. Although parameters determined on two occasions correlated well, only FCR was concordant (intraclass correlation coefficient). Thus, despite the limitations arising from the assumptions implicit to this method, metabolic parameters of Lp(a) can be estimated from the rebound of plasma concentration following apheresis.

Standardization and clinical management of lipoprotein(a) measurements

The present article proposes personal suggestions to improve determinations and clinical interpretation of results of lipoprotein(a) assays. Methods and procedures for sampling and quantification of the various isoforms of lipoprotein(a) in serum, plasma and urine are reviewed with the aim of improving the reliability and reproducibility of results and reinforcing the clinical utility of lipoprotein(a) measurements.