Purification and properties of the bacteriophage T4 gene 31 protein required for prehead assembly

Dissociation kinetics of the GroEL-gp31 chaperonin complex studied with Förster resonance energy transfer

Propagation of bacteriophage T4 in its host Escherichia coli involves the folding of the major capsid protein gp23, which is facilitated by a hybrid chaperone complex consisting of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL and the phage-encoded co-chaperonin, gp31. It has been well established that the GroEL-gp31 complex is capable of folding gp23 whereas the homologous GroEL-GroES complex cannot perform this function. To assess whether this is a consequence of differences in the interactions of the proteins within the chaperonin complex, we have investigated the dissociation kinetics of GroEL-gp31 and GroEL-GroES complexes using Forster resonance energy transfer. Here we report that the dissociation of gp31 from GroEL is slightly faster than that of GroES from GroEL and is further accelerated by the binding of gp23. In contrast to what had been observed previously, we found that gp23 is able to interact with the GroEL-GroES complex, which might explain how bacteriophage T4 redirects the folding machinery of Escherichia coli during morphogenesis.

Pseudo-T-even bacteriophage RB49 encodes CocO, a cochaperonin for GroEL, which can substitute for Escherichia coli's GroES and bacteriophage T4's Gp31

Bacteriophage T4-encoded Gp31 is a functional ortholog of the Escherichia coli GroES cochaperonin protein. Both of these proteins form transient, productive complexes with the GroEL chaperonin, required for protein folding and other related functions in the cell. However, Gp31 is specifically required, in conjunction with GroEL, for the correct folding of Gp23, the major capsid protein of T4. To better understand the interaction between GroEL and its cochaperonin cognates, we determined whether the so-called "pseudo-T-even bacteriophages" are dependent on host GroEL function and whether they also encode their own cochaperonin. Here, we report the isolation of an allele-specific mutation of bacteriophage RB49, called epsilon22, which permits growth on the E. coli groEL44 mutant but not on the isogenic wild type host. RB49 epsilon22 was used in marker rescue experiments to identify the corresponding wild type gene, which we have named cocO (cochaperonin cognate). CocO has extremely limited identity to GroES but is 34% identical and 55% similar at the protein sequence level to T4 Gp31, sharing all of the structural features of Gp31 that distinguish it from GroES. CocO can substitute for Gp31 in T4 growth and also suppresses the temperature-sensitive phenotype of the E. coli groES42 mutant. CocO's predicted mobile loop is one residue longer than that of Gp31, with the epsilon22 mutation resulting in a Q36R substitution in this extra residue. Both the CocO wild type and epsilon22 proteins have been purified and shown in vitro to assist GroEL in the refolding of denatured citrate synthase.

Genetic analysis of bacteriophage-encoded cochaperonins

Early genetic studies identified the Escherichia coli groES and groEL genes because mutations in them blocked the growth of bacteriophages lambda and T4. Subsequent genetic and biochemical analyses have shown that GroES and GroEL constitute a chaperonin machine, absolutely essential for E. coli growth, because it is needed for the correct folding of many of its proteins. In spite of very little sequence identity to GroES, the bacteriophage T4-encoded Gp31 protein and the bacteriophage RB49-encoded CocO protein are bona fide GroEL cochaperonins, even capable of substituting for GroES in E. coli growth. A major functional distinction is that only Gp31 and CocO can assist GroEL in the correct folding of Gp23, the major bacteriophage capsid protein. Conserved structural features between CocO and Gp31, which are absent from GroES, highlight their potential importance in specific cochaperonin function.

The importance of a mobile loop in regulating chaperonin/ co-chaperonin interaction: humans versus Escherichia coli

Chaperonins are universally conserved proteins that nonspecifically facilitate the folding of a wide spectrum of proteins. While bacterial GroEL is functionally promiscuous with various co-chaperonin partners, its human homologue, Hsp60 functions specifically with its co-chaperonin partner, Hsp10, and not with other co-chaperonins, such as the bacterial GroES or bacteriophage T4-encoded Gp31. Co-chaperonin interaction with chaperonin is mediated by the co-chaperonin mobile loop that folds into a beta-hairpin conformation upon binding to the chaperonin. A delicate balance of flexibility and conformational preferences of the mobile loop determines co-chaperonin affinity for chaperonin. Here, we show that the ability of Hsp10, but not GroES, to interact specifically with Hsp60 lies within the mobile loop sequence. Using mutational analysis, we show that three substitutions in the GroES mobile loop are necessary and sufficient to acquire Hsp10-like specificity. Two of these substitutions are predicted to preorganize the beta-hairpin turn and one to increase the hydrophobicity of the GroEL-binding site. Together, they result in a GroES that binds chaperonins with higher affinity. It seems likely that the single ring mitochondrial Hsp60 exhibits intrinsically lower affinity for the co-chaperonin that can be compensated for by a higher affinity mobile loop.

From minichaperone to GroEL 2: importance of avidity of the multisite ring structure

Structural studies on minichaperones and GroEL imply a continuous ring of binding sites around the neck of GroEL. To investigate the importance of this ring, we constructed an artificial heptameric assembly of minichaperones to mimic their arrangement in GroEL. The heptameric Gp31 co-chaperonin from bacteriophage T4, an analogue of GroES, was used as a scaffold to display the GroEL minichaperones. A fusion protein, MC(7), was generated by replacing a part of the highly mobile loop of Gp31 (residues 23-44) with the sequence of the minichaperone (residues 191-376 of GroEL). The purified recombinant protein assembled into a heptameric ring composed of seven 30.6 kDa subunits. Although single minichaperones (residues 193-335 to 191-376 of GroEL) have certain chaperone activities in vitro and in vivo, they cannot refold heat and dithiothreitol-denatured mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (mtMDH), a reaction that normally requires GroEL, its co-chaperonin GroES and ATP. But, MC(7) refolded MDH in vitro. The expression of MC(7) complements in vivo two temperature-sensitive Escherichia coli alleles, groEL44 and groEL673, at 43 degrees C. Although MC(7) could not compensate for the complete absence of GroEL in vivo, it enhanced the colony-forming ability of cells containing limiting amounts of wild-type GroEL at 37 degrees C. MC(7 )also reduces aggregate formation and cell death in mammalian cell models of Huntington's disease. The assembly of seven minichaperone subunits on a heptameric ring significantly improves their activity, demonstrating the importance of avidity in GroEL function.

Post-transcriptional control of bacteriophage T4 gene 25 expression: mRNA secondary structure that enhances translational initiation

Secondary structure of the mRNA in the translational initiation region is an important determinant of translation efficiency. However, the secondary structures that enhance or facilitate translation initiation are rare. We have previously proposed that such structure may exist in the case of bacteriophage T4 gene 25 translational initiation region, which contains three potential Shine-Dalgarno sequences (SD1, SD2, and SD3) with a spacing of 8, 17, and 27 nucleotides from the initiation codon of this gene, respectively. We now present results that clearly demonstrate the existence of a hairpin structure that includes SD1 and SD2 sequences and brings the SD3, the most typical of these Shine-Dalgarno sequences, to a favourable spacing with the initiation codon of gene 25. Using a phage T7 expression system, we show that mutations that prevent the formation of hairpin structure or eliminate the SD3 sequence result in a decreased level of gp25 synthesis. Double mutation in base-pair V restores the level of gene 25 expression that was decreased by either of the two mutations (C-to-G and G-to-C) alone, as predicted by an effect attributable to mRNA secondary structure. We introduced the mutations into the bacteriophage T4 by plasmid-phage recombination. Changes in the plaque and burst sizes of T4 mutants, carrying single and double mutations in the translational initiation region of gene 25, strongly suggest that the predicted mRNA secondary structure controls (enhances) the level of gene 25 expression in vivo. Hybridization of total cellular RNA with a gene 25 specific probe indicated that secondary structure or mutations in the translational initiation region do not notably affect the 25 mRNA stability. Immunoblot analysis of gp25 in Escherichia coli cells infected by T4 mutants showed that mRNA secondary structure increases the level of gp25 synthesis by three- to fourfold. Since the secondary structure increases the level of gp25 synthesis and does not affect mRNA stability, we conclude that this structure enhances translation initiation. We discuss some features of two secondary structures in the translational initiation regions of T4 genes 25 and 38.

Structural adaptations in the specialized bacteriophage T4 co-chaperonin Gp31 expand the size of the Anfinsen cage

The Gp31 protein from bacteriophage T4 functionally substitutes for the bacterial co-chaperonin GroES in assisted protein folding reactions both in vitro and in vivo. But Gp31 is required for the folding and/or assembly of the T4 major capsid protein Gp23, and this requirement cannot be satisfied by GroES. The 2.3 A crystal structure of Gp31 shows that its tertiary and quaternary structures are similar to those of GroES despite the existence of only 14% sequence identity between the two proteins. However, Gp31 shows a series of structural adaptations which will increase the size and the hydrophilicity of the "Anfinsen cage," the enclosed cavity within the GroEL/GroES complex that is the location of the chaperonin-assisted protein folding reaction.

Bacteriophage T4 encodes a co-chaperonin that can substitute for Escherichia coli GroES in protein folding

Several bacteriophages use the Escherichia coli GroES and GroEL chaperonins for folding and assembly of their morphogenetic structures. Bacteriophage T4 is unusual in that it encodes a specialized protein (Gp31) that is thought to interact with the host GroEL and to be absolutely required for the correct assembly of the major capsid protein (Gp23) in vivo. Here we show that despite the absence of amino-acid sequence similarity between Gp31 and GroES, Gp31 can functionally substitute for the GroES co-chaperonin in the morphogenesis of bacteriophages lambda and T5, the in vivo and in vitro chaperonin-dependent assembly of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco), as well as overall bacterial growth at the non-permissive temperature. Like GroES, the bacteriophage Gp31 protein forms a stable complex with the E. coli GroEL protein in the presence of Mg-ATP and inhibits the ATPase activity of GroEL in vitro.

Mutational analysis of the phage T4 morphogenetic 31 gene, whose product interacts with the Escherichia coli GroEL protein

The phage T4 morphogenetic gene 31 has been sequenced. Its deduced gene product is a polypeptide of 111 aa, with a predicted Mr of 12064 and a pI of 4.88. The proof that the assigned open reading frame (ORF) encodes Gp31 rests on the sequencing of two known gene 31 amber mutations, amN54 and NG71, demonstrating that these mutations result in translational termination within the assigned ORF. Furthermore, the sequencing of four different T4 epsilon mutations, isolated on the basis of allowing the phage to propagate on Escherichia coli groEL- hosts, showed that they are either missense mutations or 3-bp deletions in the gene 31 reading frame. The sequencing of neighboring DNA revealed the presence of five other ORFs, one of which overlaps gene 31 substantially, but in the opposite orientation.

Cloning, sequence, and expression of the temperature-dependent phage T4 capsid assembly gene 31

The products of the bacteriophage T4 capsid assembly gene 31, the T4 major capsid protein gene 23, and the Escherichia coli heat-shock groE genes participate in an interdependent mechanism in capsid protein oligomerization early in prohead assembly. Gene 31 was cloned, sequenced and expressed, and its regulation during infection was characterized. Gene 31 is more stringently required at high than at low temperature, and this requirement is reduced by temperature adaptation of the bacteria prior to infection. However, T4 gene 31 expression does not appear to be temperature regulated, nor does gene 31 apparently display sequence homology with the E. coli groE and other heat-shock genes.

Bacteriophage T4 bypass31 mutations that make gene 31 nonessential for bacteriophage T4 replication: isolation and characterization

T4 bacteriophage mutants called bypass31 (byp31) that specifically suppress gene 31 amber mutations have been isolated and characterized. The mechanism by which the byp31 mutation, byp31-1, suppresses gene 31 nonsense mutations does not involve synthesis of gp31 or of a particular gp31 fragment; furthermore, the byp31 allele suppresses all nonsense mutations in gene 31 that have been tested. We detect no unusual properties among the T4 particles made in su- cells by the T4amN54byp31-1 double mutant. These virions, made in the absence of gp31, show normal heat sensitivity, normal sensitivity to osmotic shock, and normal morphology. Specific different gene 31 missense mutants are able to form plaques with high efficiencies on the following two types of host defective cells: (i) Escherichia coli groEL (Tilly et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78:1629-1633, 1981) mutants that block T4 capsid assembly and (ii) E. coli rho mutants in which T4+ heads are assembled, but in which tail production and DNA synthesis are blocked. (Note that not all rho mutants block T4 production [G. Binkowski and L. D. Simon, p. 342-350, in C. K. Mathews, E. M. Kutter, G. Mosig, and P. B. Berget, ed., Bacteriophage T4, 1983]; T4 is able to replicate in rho mutants such as rho ts15, whose principal defect is that they fail to terminate transcription.) The byp31-1 allele permits production of T4 particles in E. coli groEL host-defective mutants, but not in E. coli rho host mutants.

Formation of the prohead core of bacteriophage T4 in vivo

Formation of the prohead core of bacteriophage T4 was not dependent on shell assembly. In mutant infections, where the production or assembly of active shell protein was not possible, naked core structures were formed. The particles were generally attached to the bacterial inner membrane and possessed defined prolate dimensions. The intracellular yield varied between 15 and 71% of a corresponding prohead yield and was dependent on the temperature of incubation. The products of genes 21 and 22 were found to be essential for in vivo core formation, whereas those of genes 20, 23, 24, 31, and 40, as well as the internal proteins I to III, were dispensable.