A protein recognized by antibodies to Asp-Asp-Asp-Glu-Asp shows specific binding activity to heterogeneous nuclear transport signals

Heat-shock protein 70 can replace viral protein R of HIV-1 during nuclear import of the viral preintegration complex

Heat-shock proteins (Hsp's) are a family of molecular chaperones that contribute to protection from environmental stress. In this report, we demonstrate that a member of this family, Hsp70, facilitates nuclear import of HIV-1 preintegration complexes (PICs). The mechanism of this activity appears to be similar to the one used by Vpr, an HIV-1 protein regulating viral nuclear import and replication in macrophages. Indeed Hsp70 stimulated binding of HIV-1 matrix antigen to GST-karyopherin alpha fusion protein and rescued nuclear import of a Vpr-defective HIV-1 strain in vitro. Binding studies with truncated forms of GST-karyopherin alpha demonstrated that both Vpr and Hsp70 bind to a region in the amino-terminal part of the karyopherin alpha molecule. This region appears to be distinct from the binding sites for two other karyopherin alpha cargoes, basic-type NLS-containing proteins and transcription factor STAT-1. Vpr competed with Hsp70 for binding to karyopherin alpha. These results suggest the presence of a novel regulatory site on karyopherin alpha which is used by Hsp70 and Vpr to stimulate interaction between the HIV-1 PIC and karyopherin alpha and thus promote viral nuclear import.

Interdependence between a 55 kDa protein (p55) and a 12 kDa protein (p12) in facilitating the nuclear entry of goat uterine estrogen receptor under cell-free conditions

A 55 kDa nuclear localization signal binding protein (p55) is involved in the transport of the goat uterine estrogen receptor from the cytoplasm to the nuclear pore complex (NPC). p55 forms a complex with a 12 kDa protein (p12) which in turn becomes 'docked' at the NPC. The present study reports on the purification and functional characterization of p12. Both p55 and p12 are Mg2+-dependent ATPases. The protein-protein interactions that take place between these two molecules at the NPC cause an enhancement in the net ATPase activity associated with the protein complex. Presumably, this enhanced ATPase function helps in the final nuclear entry of the estrogen receptor; p55 remains associated with p12 at the nuclear entry site under these conditions.

A nuclear export signal prevents Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hsp70 Ssb1p from stimulating nuclear localization signal-directed nuclear transport

Hsp70 has been implicated in nuclear localization signal (NLS)-directed nuclear transport. Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains distinct SSA and SSB gene families of cytosolic Hsp70s. The nucleocytoplasmic localization of Ssa1p and Ssb1p was investigated using green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions. Whereas GFP-Ssa1p localized both to the nucleus and cytoplasm, GFP-Ssb1p appeared only in the cytosol. The C-terminal domain of Ssb1p contains a leucine-rich nuclear export signal (NES) that is necessary and sufficient to direct nuclear export. The accumulation of GFP-Ssb1p in the nuclei of xpo1-1 cells suggests that Ssb1p shuttles across the nuclear envelope. Elevated levels of SSA1 but not SSB1 suppressed the NLS-GFP nuclear localization defects of nup188-Delta cells. Studies with Ssa1p/Ssb1p chimeras revealed that the Ssb1p NES is sufficient and necessary to inhibit the function of Ssa- or Ssb-type Hsp70s in nuclear transport. Thus, NES-less Ssb1p stimulates nuclear transport in nup188-Delta cells and NES-containing Ssa1p does not. We conclude that the differential function of Ssa1p and Ssb1p in nuclear transport is due to the NES-directed export of the Ssb1p and not to functional differences in their ATPase or peptide binding domains.

Intracellular location of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC6 gene product

The CDC6 gene product from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for transition from late G1 to S phase of the cell cycle. We have investigated the subcellular localization of the CDC6 protein in yeast to explore where Cdc6p exerts its gene function (s). Using affinity-purified sera we localized Cdc6p to the cytoplasm and the nuclear matrix by both subcellular fractionation and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy. The nuclear localization was confirmed to be in the nuclear scaffold by the low-salt extraction method. The Cdc6p cannot be detected in the mitochondrial or plasma membrane fractions. Using indirect immunofluorescence, we found that a subpopulation of Cdc6p migrated into the nucleus after G1/S transition and diminished after M phase, suggesting its temporal role in nuclear DNA replication. The predicted Cdc6p polypeptide contains a conserved nuclear localization, 27PLKRKKL33, similar to that of the SV40 large T antigen and other nuclear proteins. To test whether this peptide segment plays a role in mediating nuclear transport, we have carried out site-directed mutagenesis to alter the conserved 29Lys to Thr and Arg. The wild-type nuclear localization signal of Cdc6p was found to mediate the LacZ reporter gene fused to CDC6 efficiently to the nucleus, but not the mutated versions of the nuclear localization motif. The results suggested that 29Lys is important in mediating nuclear localization, the 29Thr and 29Arg mutant versions of the CDC6 gene were also unable to complement the cdc6 temperature-sensitive mutant. However, when these mutants were expressed from a multicopy plasmid, the mutated genes could complement the mutation. Similar results were obtained in the cdc6-disrupted cells. Taken together, we suggest that (i) Cdc6p is predominantly located in the cytoplasm, (ii) the nuclear entry of Cdc6p is cell cycle dependent, and (iii) nuclear entry of Cdc6p is mediated by its nuclear localization signal. The presence of Cdc6p in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm suggests a model that Cdc6p exerts its gene function in DNA replication and mitotic restraint in the cell cycle.

Agonist-free transformation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human B-lymphoma cells

Nuclear translocation of activated glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) is a necessary step in the signal transduction by these GC hormones. Although in vitro activation of GRs can occur in the absence of a functional ligand, it is generally assumed that binding of a cognate hormone is required for activation of the intracellular GR. By indirect immunocytochemistry and Western-blot analysis, it was found that, in spontaneously aggregated human lymphoma DoHH2 cells, hormone-free GRs are located in the nucleus. Disruption of the aggregates redistributed GRs to a predominantly cytosolic location. Upon spontaneous re-aggregation the GR again became localized to the nucleus. Intracellular cross-linking of the heteromeric receptor complex was applied to investigate the protein composition of cytoplasmic and nuclear receptors. Untransformed, cytosolic GRs could be demonstrated by [3H]dexamethasone binding capacity and hsp90 co-immunoprecipitation, whereas absence of these characteristics suggested an activated conformation of the nuclear GRs. These observations suggest that cell-cell interactions are capable of transforming GRs in the absence of a ligand.

Intracellular structure and nucleocytoplasmic transport

Intracellular movement of any solute or particle accords with one of two general schemes: either it takes place predominantly in the solution phase or it occurs by dynamic interactions with solid-state structures. If nucleocytoplasmic exchanges of macromolecules and complexes are predominantly solution-phase processes, i.e., if the former ("diffusionist") perspective applies, then the only significant structures in nucleocytoplasmic transport are the pore complexes. However, if such exchanges accord with the latter ("solid-state") perspective, then the roles of the nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton in nucleocytoplasmic transport are potentially, at least, as important as that of the pore complexes. The role of the nucleoskeleton in mRNA transport is more difficult to evaluate than that of the cytoskeleton because it is less well characterized, and current evidence does not exclude either perspective. However, the balance of evidence favors a solid-state scheme. It is argued that ribosomal subunits are also more likely to migrate by a solid-state rather than a diffusionist mechanism, though the opposite is true of proteins and tRNAs. Moreover, recent data on the effects of viral proteins on intranuclear RNA processing and migration accord with the solid-state perspective. In view of this balance of evidence, three possible solid-state mechanisms for nucleocytoplasmic mRNA transport are described and evaluated. The explanatory advantage of solid-state models is contrasted with the heuristic advantage of diffusion theory, but it is argued that diffusion theory itself, even aided by modern computational techniques and numerical and graphical approaches, cannot account for data describing the movements of materials within the cell. Therefore, the mechanisms envisaged in a diffusionist perspective cannot be confined to diffusion alone, but must include other processes such as bulk fluid flow.

Inactivation of the yeast Sen1 protein affects the localization of nucleolar proteins

A mutation in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SEN1 gene causes accumulation of end-matured, intron-containing pre-tRNAs. Cells containing the thermosensitive sen1-1 mutation exhibit reduced tRNA splicing endonuclease activity. However, Sen1p is not the catalytic subunit of this enzyme. We have used Sen1p-specific antibodies for cell fractionation studies and immunofluorescent microscopy and determined that Sen1p is a low abundance protein of about 239 kDa. It localizes to the nucleus with a granular distribution. We verified that a region in SEN1 containing a putative nuclear localization signal sequence (NLS) is necessary for nuclear targeting. Furthermore, we found that inactivation of Sen1p by temperature shift of a strain carrying sen1-1 leads to mislocalization of two nucleolar proteins, Nop1 and Ssb1. Possible mechanisms are discussed for several related nuclear functions of Sen1p, including tRNA splicing and the maintenance of a normal crescent-shaped nucleolus.

A karyophilic protein forms a stable complex with cytoplasmic components prior to nuclear pore binding

Targeting of karyophilic proteins to nuclear pores is known to require several cytoplasmic factors, including the nuclear location signal-binding protein. Using a digitonin-permeabilized cell-free transport assay, we have obtained a cytoplasmic fraction containing factors that specifically bind to karyophilic protein and support the nuclear binding step of the transport. Components in this fraction form a stable complex with the karyophile through interaction with nuclear location signal. Since this complex shows nuclear pore binding activity prior to nuclear entry in the absence of other cytosolic factors, we call it nuclear pore-targeting complex. It consists of karyophilic protein and four proteins of 54, 56, 66, and 90 kDa. In our reconstitution experiments, a complex with 54 and 90 kDa proteins is capable of targeting karyophiles to the nuclear pores.

Putative nuclear localization signals (NLS) in protein transcription factors

We have recognized about ten distinct forms of strongly basic hexapeptides, containing at least four arginines and lysines, characteristic of nuclear proteins among all eukaryotic species, including yeast, plants, flies and mammals. These basic hexapeptides are considered to be different versions of a core nuclear localization signal, NLS. Core NLSs are present in nearly all nuclear proteins and absent from nearly all "nonassociated" cytoplasmic proteins that have been investigated. We suggest that the few (approximately 10%) protein factors lacking a typical NLS core peptide may enter the nucleus via their strong crosscomplexation with their protein factor partners that possess a core NLS. Those cytoplasmic proteins found to possess a NLS-like peptide are either tightly associated with cell membrane proteins or are integral components of large cytoplasmic protein complexes. On the other hand, some versions of core NLSs are found in many cell membrane proteins and secreted proteins. It is hypothesized that in these cases the N-terminal hydrophobic signal peptide of extracellular proteins and the internal hydrophobic domains of transmembrane proteins are stronger determinants for their subcellular localization. The position of core NLSs among homologous nuclear proteins may or may not be conserved; however, if lost from an homologous site it appears elsewhere in the protein. This search provides a set of rules to our understanding of the nature of core nuclear localization signals: (1) Core NLS are proposed to consist most frequently of an hexapeptide with 4 arginines and lysines; (2) aspartic and glutamic acid residues as well as bulky amino acids (F, Y, W) need not to be present in this hexapeptide; (3) acidic residues and proline or glycine that break the alpha-helix are frequently in the flanking region of this hexapeptide stretch; (4) hydrophobic residues ought not to be present in the core NLS flanking region allowing for the NLS to be exposed on the protein. In this study we attempt to classify putative core NLS from a wealth of nuclear protein transcription factors from diverse species into several categories, and we propose additional core NLS structures yet to be experimentally verified.

Architecture of the nuclear pore complex and its involvement in nucleocytoplasmic transport

Recent structural analyses of the nuclear pore complex (NPC) have described in some detail the numerous sub-domains which make up this supramolecular assembly. Three dimensional image analysis of detergent-extracted NPCs reveals that the NPC framework is made up of spoke units, each containing four major domains, arranged with 822 symmetry. As shown by freeze-drying/metal shadowing techniques, attached to this framework are several peripheral components including particles and fibers on the cytoplasmic face and a cage-like structure on the nucleoplasmic face. While it is known that traffic between cytoplasm and nucleus occurs exclusively through the nuclear pore, the specifics of NPC involvement in such traffic remain unknown at present. Proteins destined for the nucleus contain nuclear localization sequences (NLSs). Several proteins have been identified which bind to these NLSs and may act to direct these proteins to the NPC, either releasing them prior to or remaining attached during translocation through the NPC. These NLS-binding proteins have been localized to the cytoplasm, nucleus, nuclear envelope and nucleolus, suggesting some of these proteins transverse the NPC bound or unbound to NLS-containing proteins.

New model for 70 kDa heat-shock proteins' potential mechanisms of function

The 70 kDa family of heat-shock proteins (hsp 70s and hsc 70s) can facilitate protein transport to several organelles. This process is thought to involve electrostatic interactions between hsp 70s and the cellular protein targeting sequences. Analysis of the highly conserved structural and functional properties of the hsp 70 family indicated that they may cross-link cellular proteins to the actin microfilament network. Direct experimental support for this hypothesis was provided by the finding that hsp 70 is constitutively bound to actin through hydrophobic interactions. The cross-linker model may provide an explanation for the mechanism by which the cytoskeletal matrix could mediate various cellular processes.

Movement of macromolecules between the cytoplasm and the nucleus in yeast

Since the first description of signals for nuclear protein localization, studies with yeast have played an important role in our understanding of nuclear protein import. Very recent experiments suggest that new insights into the poorly understood process of RNA export will also emerge from analyses of yeast. Recent advances have facilitated our understanding of protein and RNA exchange between the nucleus and cytoplasm.

Intracellular distribution of a nuclear localization signal binding protein

The transport of proteins into the nucleus requires the recognition of a nuclear localization signal sequence. Several proteins that interact with these sequences have been identified, including one of about 66 kDa. We have prepared antibodies that recognize the 66-kDa nuclear localization signal binding protein (NLSBP) and inhibit nuclear localization in vitro. By immunofluorescence, it is seen that the NLSBP is predominantly cytoplasmic and is distributed peripherally around the nucleus and the microtubule organizing center. There is also a weak punctate staining of the surface of the nucleus. Methanol-fixed cells can also be stained directly with fluorescently labeled karyophilic proteins. These stains reveal the same cytoplasmic structures as anti-NLSBP. The expression of the NLSBP is growth dependent. When cells grown to confluence are examined, the cytoplasmic staining is greatly reduced, leaving the punctate nuclear staining as the predominant feature. In serum-starved cells, very little staining of either the cytoplasm or the nucleus can be seen. Upon simulation by the addition of serum, the original cytoplasmic and nuclear envelope staining is restored. Cells grown in the presence of colchicine or taxol have an altered NLSBP distribution but apparently normal cytoplasmic nuclear transport.

Nopp140 shuttles on tracks between nucleolus and cytoplasm

Nopp140 is a nucleolar phosphoprotein of 140 kd that we originally identified and purified as a nuclear localization signal (NLS)-binding protein. Molecular characterization revealed a 10-fold repeated motif of highly conserved acidic serine clusters that contain an abundance of phosphorylation consensus sites for casein kinase II (CK II). Indeed, Nopp140 is one of the most phosphorylated proteins in the cell, and NLS binding was dependent on phosphorylation. Nopp140 was shown to shuttle between the nucleolus and the cytoplasm. Shuttling is likely to proceed on tracks that were revealed by immunoelectron microscopy. These tracks extend from the dense fibrillar component of the nucleolus across the nucleoplasm to some nuclear pore complexes. We suggest that Nopp140 functions as a chaperone for import into and/or export from the nucleolus.

Architecture and design of the nuclear pore complex

A three-dimensional analysis of the nuclear pore complex reveals the underlying, highly symmetric framework of this supramolecular assembly, how it is anchored in the nuclear membrane, and how it is built from many distinct, interconnected subunits. The arrangement of the subunits within the membrane pore creates a large central channel, through which active nucleocytoplasmic transport is known to occur, and eight smaller peripheral channels that are probable routes for passive diffusion of ions and small molecules.

Nuclear transport: a guide to import receptors

After synthesis in the cytoplasm, nuclear proteins traverse the nuclear envelope as a result of the specific recognition of nuclear localization signals by import. Various approaches have now uncovered a range of proteins with at least some of the characteristics expected of import receptors. This article focuses on early steps in the nuclear import of proteins and surveys the recently identified candidate import receptors.

Association of the transformed glucocorticoid receptor with a cytoskeletal protein complex

In a recent paper we described a system in which glucocorticoid receptors associate with particulate complexes containing tubulin [Cancer Res. 49 (1989) 2222s-2229s]. When L cell cytosol is mixed with a microtubule stabilizing buffer and heated to 37 degrees C, the receptor becomes associated with a complex that can be centrifuged out of solution at 150,000 g. In this work we show that the glucocorticoid receptor-cytoskeletal protein complex forms in a temperature and glutamate-dependent manner. Molybdate does not affect generation of the cytoskeletal protein complex but it inhibits association of the receptor with the complex. This suggests that transformation of the receptor to its DNA-binding form is required for interaction with the cytoskeletal complex. Colchicine has no effect on generation of the particulate complex or on the association of receptor with it, suggesting that formation of the complex does not represent a classic in vitro process of tubulin polymerization.

Cytosolic proteins that specifically bind nuclear location signals are receptors for nuclear import

We have purified two major polypeptides of 54 and 56 kd from bovine erythrocytes that specifically bind the nuclear location sequence (NLS) of the SV40 large T antigen. When added to a permeabilized cell system for nuclear import, the purified proteins increase by 2- to 3-fold the nuclear accumulation of a fluorescent protein containing the large T antigen NLS. The import stimulation is saturable and dependent upon the presence of cytosol. Nuclear protein accumulation in vitro is sensitive to inactivation by N-ethylmaleimide (NEM). NEM inactivation can be overcome by addition of the purified NLS-binding proteins to the import system. NEM treatment of the purified proteins abolishes their ability to stimulate import but does not affect NLS binding. Our results indicate that the NLS-binding proteins are NEM-sensitive receptors for nuclear import. At least one other NEM-sensitive cytosolic activity and an NEM-insensitive cytosolic activity are also necessary for protein import in vitro.

How proteins enter the nucleus

Nuclear protein import is a selective process. Proteins destined for the nucleus contain NLSs. These short stretches of amino acids interact with proteins located in the cytoplasm, on the nuclear envelope, and/or at the nuclear pore complex. Following binding at the pore complex, proteins are translocated through the pore into the nucleus in a manner requiring ATP. The biochemical dissection of the nuclear pore complex has begun. Alteration of protein import into the nucleus is emerging as a new and complex form of regulation. However, we are left with the following problems: How do proteins move through the cytoplasm to reach the nuclear pore? How does the nuclear pore complex open and close in a selective manner? How is ATP utilized during import? And finally, how is bi-directional traffic of both proteins and RNA through the pore regulated?