Expression of androgen receptor in insect cells. Purification of the receptor and renaturation of its steroid- and DNA-binding functions

Biochemical characterization of androgen receptor-interacting protein 4

ARIP4 [AR (androgen receptor)-interacting protein 4] is a member of the SNF2-like family of proteins. Its sequence similarity to known proteins is restricted to the centrally located SNF2 ATPase domain. ARIP4 is an active ATPase, and dsDNA (double-stranded DNA) and ssDNA (single-stranded DNA) enhance its catalytic activity. We show in the present study that ARIP4 interacts with AR and binds to DNA and mononucleosomes. The N-terminal region of ARIP4 mediates interaction with AR. Kinetic parameters of the ARIP4 ATPase are similar to those of BRG-1 and SNF2h, two members of the SNF2-like protein family, but the specific activity of ARIP4 protein purified to >90% homogeneity is approximately ten times lower, being 120 molecules of ATP hydrolysed by an ARIP4 molecule per min in contrast with approx. 1000 ATP molecules hydrolysed per min by ATP-dependent chromatin remodellers. Unlike other members of the SNF2 family, ARIP4 does not appear to form large protein complexes in vivo or remodel mononucleosomes in vitro. ARIP4 is covalently modified by sumoylation, and mutation of six potential SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier) attachment sites abolished the ability of ARIP4 to bind DNA, hydrolyse ATP and activate AR function. We conclude that, similar to its closest homologues in the SNF2-like protein family, ATRX (alpha-thalassemia, mental retardation, X-linked) and Rad54, ARIP4 does not seem to be a classical chromatin remodelling protein.

Effect of geldanamycin on androgen receptor function and stability

In the ligand-binding inactive state, the steroid receptor heterocomplex contains Hsp90, Hsp70, high-molecular weight immunophilins, and other proteins. Hsp90 acts in association with co-chaperones to maintain the native state of the receptor within the cells. It was reported earlier that Hsp90 might not be as important for the androgen receptor (AR) activity as for the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and the progesterone receptor (PR) activities. We used the Hsp90 inhibitor geldanamycin (GA) to explore the role of Hsp90 in the function of the AR heterocomplex. GA selectively binds to Hsp90 and inhibits its activity, leading to the loss of steroid receptor activity, and frequently, its degradation. In our study, LNCaP prostate cancer cells were treated with GA for 30 minutes or 24 hours, in the presence of mibolerone, a synthetic androgen. GA reduced the androgen-induced AR protein levels to 15% after 24 hours of treatment. Several androgen up-regulated genes, including immunophilin FKBP51 and prostate specific antigen (PSA), were reduced by GA treatment. In cells treated with GA after transfection with a PSA promoter or an androgen response element-driven reporter gene, AR-mediated transactivation of reporter gene expression was reversibly inhibited by GA. Loss of androgen-binding ability and AR levels was attributed to reduced transcription of AR-regulated gene expression. Degradation rate of 35S-labeled AR was significantly increased by GA in the presence or absence of mibolerone. GA induced the degradation of AR through the proteasomal pathway. AR in cells treated with proteasomal inhibitor lactacystin, was insoluble in Nonidet P-40 (NP40)-based buffer and could not restore the androgen-binding ability. We report here that GA treatment disrupted both hormone-binding activity and receptor protein stability, resulting in a dramatic loss of androgen-induced gene activation. These results show that Hsp90 activity is important for both the chaperone-mediated folding of the AR into a high-affinity ligand-binding conformation and the functional activity of the AR.

Recombinant expression and purification of human androgen receptor in a baculovirus system

A full-length human androgen receptor (hAR) cDNA was used to produce recombinant baculovirus. Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) cells infected with this virus expressed protein with an N-terminal hexahistidine tag (His(6)-hAR) in soluble and insoluble forms. The soluble cytosolic His(6)-hAR demonstrated similar association and dissociation half-times for mibolerone, similar binding affinity for mibolerone, and similar steroid specificity as bona fide AR. Under native conditions, the soluble cytosolic His(6)-hAR was purified to apparent homogeneity in the presence of dihydrotestosterone, using metal ion affinity chromatography. The insoluble pellet fraction was solubilized with strong denaturant 6 M guanidine HCl, and His(6)-hAR was purified from it in the presence of 6 M guanidine HCl. Both the solubilized crude pellet fraction and the solubilized/purified His(6)-hAR could be renatured to bind mibolerone. The baculovirus system will therefore provide an efficient means for producing hAR for ligand-binding assays, as well as purifying hAR for detailed molecular analyses.

Androgen receptor signalling: comparative analysis of androgen response elements and implication of heat-shock protein 90 and 14-3-3eta

Androgen receptor (AR) signalling was analysed using as models the cysteine-rich secretory protein-1 (CRISP-1) and CRISP-3 gene promoters, which are differentially regulated by androgen in vivo and contain multiple potential androgen response elements. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assay, we identified several elements with differing affinities for the AR at positions -3706, -1270, -1253 and -350 of the CRISP-1 promoter and at positions -369 and -349 of the CRISP-3 promoter. The strongest binding was observed for the -1253 element of CRISP-1. In transactivation assays using a PC-3 cell line stably transfected with the AR (PC-3/AR), the -1253 element placed as two or four copies upstream of the TK minimal promoter yielded a strong induction of luciferase reporter gene activity in the presence of the androgen methyltrienolone (R1881). In the context of the CRISP promoters a 2-fold induction by R1881 was measured for the CRISP-3 upstream region whereas only limited effects were noted for the CRISP-1 upstream region. The androgenic stimulation of the p(-1253 ARE)(4x)-TK-luciferase reporter construct was dose-dependently inhibited by geldanamycin and radicicol, two compounds that selectively interact with the chaperone protein, heat-shock protein 90. Cotransfection with an expression vector for the 14-3-3eta protein markedly enhanced the androgen-dependent stimulation. These results emphasize the influence of promoter context on androgen regulation and the importance of AR-associated proteins.

Rat prostaglandin D2 synthetase: its tissue distribution, changes during maturation, and regulation in the testis and epididymis

The changes in glutathione-independent prostaglandin D2 synthetase (PGD-S) during maturation in the rat were determined in selected organs by an RIA using PGD-S purified from rat cerebrospinal fluid and a monospecific anti-rat PGD-S polyclonal antibody. In a survey of its tissue distribution in various organ extracts and biological fluids, it was found that the concentration of PGD-S was highest in the epididymis-about 6- and 80-fold greater than that in the brain and testis, respectively. During maturation, PGD-S concentration increased steadily in the testis and epididymis; this is in contrast to the pattern of changes in the brain and liver, which showed a general trend of decline. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Southern blotting were used to demonstrate the presence of PGD-S mRNA transcript in the testis and in Sertoli and germ cells. In the epididymis, the steady-state PGD-S mRNA level was highest in the caput, followed by the cauda and corpus. Orchiectomy induced a drastic reduction of PGD-S concentration in all three epididymal compartments. Administration of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) failed to restore the reduced epididymal PGD-S level except in the caput epididymis, where 4 days after DHT treatment the level of PGD-S was restored to about 50% of the pre-orchiectomized level; this suggests that the epididymal PGD-S level is not entirely regulated by androgen and that another yet to be identified testicular factor(s) is likely to be involved in its regulation. Germ cell-conditioned medium was also shown to stimulate PGD-S expression in the Sertoli cell. These results illustrate that PGD-S is an important molecule in testicular and epididymal function and that it is likely involved in spermatogenesis and sperm maturation.

Multiple receptor domains interact to permit, or restrict, androgen-specific gene activation

A critical problem within transcription factor families is how diverse regulatory programs are directed by highly related members. Androgen and glucocorticoid receptors (AR, GR) recognize a consensus DNA hormone response element (HRE), but they activate target genes with precise specificity, largely dependent on the promoter and cell context. We have assessed the role of different receptor domains in hormone-specific response by testing chimeras of AR and GR for their ability to activate the androgen-specific enhancer of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene. Although all of the mutant receptors activated simple HREs, only a few activated the androgen-specific element. One component shared by receptors functional on the AR-specific target was the AR DNA binding domain. Activation was not due to differential DNA affinity but rather to the AR DNA binding domain escaping suppression directed at the GR DNA binding domain in this enhancer context. A further mechanism increasing specific activation was cooperation of receptors at multiple and weak HREs, which was accentuated in the presence of both the AR N terminus and ligand binding domain. These domains together increased recognition of weak HREs, as demonstrated by in vitro DNase I footprinting and transactivation of mutant enhancers. Further, AR N-terminal subdomains reported to interact directly with the ligand binding domain relieved an inhibitory effect imposed by that domain. Therefore, functions intrinsic to AR augment steroid-specific gene activation, by evading negative regulation operating on the domains of other receptors and by enhancing cooperativity through intra- and inter-receptor domain interactions. These subtle distinctions in AR and GR behavior enforce transcriptional specificity established by the context of nonreceptor factors.

Tissue-specific and androgen-repressible regulation of the rat dehydroepiandrosterone sulfotransferase gene promoter

Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfotransferase (Std) catalyzes sulfonation of androgenic steroids and certain aromatic procarcinogens. In rats, this enzyme is selectively expressed in the liver, and its expression is strongly repressed by androgens. DNase I footprinting and electrophoretic mobility shift analyses revealed two hepatocyte nuclear factor-1 (HNF1), three CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP), and one consensus palindromic thyroid hormone response elements within the first 215 base pairs (bp) of the promoter sequence of rat Std. This promoter is normally inactive in fibroblast-derived NIH 3T3 cells. However, overexpression of HNF1 and C/EBP resulted in synergistic activation of the Std promoter in this cell type, indicating essential roles of these two trans-regulators in liver-selective expression of the rat Std gene. On the other hand, point mutations at any one of five cis elements proximal to the -215 bp region markedly reduced reporter gene expression, suggesting that all of these sites are important for overall promoter function. Androgenic repression of the Std gene in rat liver can be recapitulated in androgen receptor (AR)-negative HepG2 hepatoma cells after cotransfection with an AR expression plasmid. Functional assay of a nested set of 5'-deleted promoters mapped the negative androgen response region between positions -235 and -310. Antibody supershift and oligonucleotide competition identified three OCT-1 and two C/EBP elements between bp -231 and -292. An additional OCT-1 site was found to overlap with a C/EBP element at the -262/-252 position. Mutational inactivation of any one of five cis elements within the -231/-292 region abolished negative androgen response. However, none of these cis elements showed DNase I protection by recombinant AR in footprinting assay, suggesting the absence of a direct AR-DNA interaction. Thus, these studies on rat Std promoter function indicate that (i) HNF1 and C/EBP are responsible for liver specificity of the rat Std gene; (ii) androgenic repression of the gene requires the presence of all of the OCT-1 and C/EBP elements between positions -231 and -292; and (iii) AR may exert its negative regulatory effect indirectly through transcriptional interference of OCT-1 and C/EBP rather than through a direct DNA-AR interaction.

Interaction between the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions of the rat androgen receptor modulates transcriptional activity and is influenced by nuclear receptor coactivators

Identical N-terminal deletions in the wild-type rat androgen receptor (rAR) and a constitutively active rAR (ARDelta641-902) devoid of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) resulted in dissimilar consequences in transcriptional activation: deletion of residues 149-295 abolished wild-type AR activity, but did not influence that of ARDelta641-902. The activity of the N-terminal transactivation domain is thus controlled by the hormone-occupied LBD, suggesting that the N- and C-terminal regions of rAR communicate. Consistent with this idea, a strong androgen-dependent interaction between the N-terminal region and LBD was demonstrated in a mammalian two-hybrid system using GAL4 and VP16 fusion proteins. This interaction can be direct or indirect. Several nuclear receptor coactivators (CBP, F-SRC-1, SRC-1, and RIP140) that interact with other steroid receptors were tested as potential mediators of the N- and C-terminal interaction of rAR using the mammalian two-hybrid system. CBP or F-SRC-1 not only enhanced AR-mediated transactivation, but also facilitated the androgen-dependent interaction between the N- and C-terminal domains, implying that part of the coactivator-dependent transcriptional activation occurs via this mechanism. In contrast, SRC-1, a coactivator for the progesterone receptor, inhibited both AR-mediated transactivation and interaction between the N and C termini. Recruitment of coregulators may involve AR domains other than the LBD, as F-SRC-1 and CBP enhanced, but SRC-1 repressed, the transcriptional activity of ARDelta641-902. Collectively, interplay between the N-terminal region and LBD of rAR results in the formation of a transactivation complex that includes coregulators and that is mandatory for optimal activation of androgen-induced promoters.

Interaction of androgen receptors with androgen response element in intact cells. Roles of amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions and the ligand

Promoter interference assay was employed to examine in intact cells the roles of the functional domains of androgen receptor (AR) and the ligand for specific DNA interactions using a cytomegalovirus-(androgen response element)-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter (pCMV-ARE2-CAT). Native rat and human ARs interfered with pCMV-ARE2-CAT expression in a hormone-dependent fashion. Low steroid-independent interference seemed to occur because of the ligand binding domain (LBD), which was transcriptionally inhibitory also in a heterologous context. AR devoid of LBD (rARDelta641-902) decreased pCMV-ARE2-CAT activity by 50%. The rARDelta46-408 mutant devoid of the NH2-terminal transcription activation region exhibited ligand-dependent promoter interference of a similar magnitude. Ligand and DNA binding-deficient mutants (hARM807R and rARC562G, respectively) did not influence pCMV-ARE2-CAT expression, although hARM807R binds to ARE in vitro. Non-steroidal anti-androgens casodex and hydroxyflutamide antagonized agonist-dependent promoter interference, whereas cyproterone acetate, RU 56187, RU 57073, and RU 59063 were partial agonists/antagonists. Collectively, interaction of ARs with ARE in intact cells does not require the presence of the COOH-terminal or NH2-terminal domain and/or their interaction. In the context of native AR, however, the androgen-induced conformational change in LBD is mandatory for generation of a transcriptionally competent receptor that binds to DNA in intact cells.

Hsp90 regulates androgen receptor hormone binding affinity in vivo

The regulation of human androgen receptor (AR) by the molecular chaperone Hsp90 was investigated using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system. These studies were performed in strains expressing a conditional temperature-sensitive mutant allele of the hsp82 gene, which encodes Hsp90 protein. At the restrictive temperature in the mutant, there is a decrease in hormone-dependent transactivation by the AR, although steady state levels of AR protein are unchanged. Quantitative hormone binding studies at the permissive temperature revealed the presence of both high affinity and low affinity hormone binding states. At the restrictive temperature in the hsp82 mutant, the high affinity state was abolished, and only the low affinity state was observed. The change in hormone binding affinity was further investigated by a competition assay with the anti-androgen hydroxyflutamide. Under permissive conditions, hydroxyflutamide competes poorly for the synthetic androgen R1881, but under restrictive conditions in the hsp82 mutant strain, hydroxyflutamide was shown to be a potent competitive inhibitor. Our findings indicate that Hsp90 participates in the activation process by maintaining apoAR in a high affinity ligand binding conformation which is important for efficient response to hormone.

Stoichiometry and site-specific phosphorylation of human progesterone receptor in native target cells and in the baculovirus expression system

Human progesterone receptor (PR) in T47D breast cancer cells is phosphorylated on nine different serine residues; three are hormone-inducible (Ser102, Ser294, and Ser345), while others are basal but hormone-stimulated. In the present study, we have compared the phosphorylation state of native and recombinant PR expressed in a baculovirus insect cell system. Stoichiometric measurements showed that unliganded native PR in T47D cells was approximately 50% phosphorylated ( approximately 4 phosphates/PR) and became essentially 100% phosphorylated ( approximately 9 phosphates/PR) when bound to hormone. Unliganded PR expressed in Sf9 insect cells was phosphorylated with a similar stoichiometry ( approximately 3 phosphates/PR), but the phosphate content did not change with hormone addition. Site-specific phosphorylation analyzed by tryptic phosphopeptide mapping and manual peptide sequencing revealed that expressed PR bound to hormone in the Sf9 insect cells was phosphorylated on all the same sites as hormone-treated PR in T47D cells. Only minor differences were detected in the relative proportion of three sites (two basal sites and Ser345) and phosphorylation did not occur on alternate sites. Interestingly, unliganded baculovirus-expressed PR was constitutively phosphorylated on hormone inducible sites and was phosphorylated on basal sites to the same extent as hormone treated PR. Thus, in the absence of hormone, the phosphorylation state of baculovirus-expressed PR resembled that of the hyperphosphorylated native PR. In contrast to native PR, the expressed receptor in cytosols of Sf9 cells did not form a large oligomeric complex suggesting that hyperphosphorylation may be due to dissociation of the complex in the absence of hormone. This study demonstrating phosphorylation on correct sites with a stoichiometry similar to that of native PR indicates that overexpressed PR in the baculovirus system is suitable for in vitro structure/function studies.

DNA-binding of androgen receptor overexpressed in mammalian cells

In order to investigate the DNA-binding properties of the rat androgen receptor (rAR) in mammalian cells after addition of androgens and antiandrogens, we established a gel-shift assay with extract from COS-1 cells (CV-1 cells transformed with the DNA-tumour virus SV40) over-expressing the rAR. First, the rAR was overexpressed in COS-1 cells. Therefore the full-length AR cDNA was inserted immediately downstream from the SV40 early promoter of pECE to generate pECE-AR. Expression of the rAR driven by the SV40 early promoter yields constant and high levels of rAR protein. In addition, the vector contains the SV40 origin of replication for obtaining high copy vector numbers in COS-1 cells. The rAR-containing expression vector was transiently transfected into COS-1 cells using Transfectam Reagent, in order to achieve high transfection efficiency. Expression of biologically active receptor was tested by analyzing the effect of the synthetic androgen R1881 on induction of transiently transfected pMMTV-CAT. Steroid binding assays were carried out to confirm overexpression of biologically active AR and to determine the binding of different hormones and antihormones to AR in COS-1 cells transiently transfected with pECE-AR. Gel-shift experiments performed with whole cell extract of those cells, containing approximately 700 fmol AR/mg protein, and labeled AR-binding GRE (glucocorticoid responsive element) showed that R1881 induced the formation of a protein-GRE complex. Furthermore, the R1881-induced formation of the protein-GRE complex could be completed by addition of unlabeled excess of GRE but not of unspecific oligonucleotides, confirming sequence-specific binding of the R1881-induced protein-GRE complex.

Androgen insensitivity syndrome

In a relatively short period of time, understanding of the fundamental causes of androgen insensitivity syndromes has improved dramatically. This has been brought about by the combination of several disciplines, including endocrinology, genetics, developmental and molecular biology. Mutations can be identified in the androgen receptor gene in suspected cases of AIS, and their functional consequences examined in various in-vitro systems. This information can then be correlated with the clinical presentation of the patient, and is beginning to provide an explanation for the highly variable clinical presentation of AIS. It is to be hoped that this information will also help to predict the likely outcome of androgen therapy in infants with PAIS and an intersex phenotype. More speculatively, functional studies may also lead to novel strategies for the treatment of patients. This would then be of enormous benefit to both patient and parents. Furthermore, the identification of a mutation allows precise information for genetic counselling of families affected by AIS. However, many questions still remain to challenge clinicians and scientists alike. These include the risk of testicular malignancy in patients with AIS and currently there is no worldwide consensus on the stage at which testes should be removed from patients reared as female. There are also significant challenges in patient counselling. Although there is greater understanding of the molecular defects that cause AIS, there are several examples of patients with a similar degree of receptor dysfunction, or even the same mutation, but whose phenotypes are widely different. Other factors must therefore contribute to the clinical presentation of AIS, although these have not been identified. Finally, there are the mutations in patients with Kennedy's disease. The consequences of the mutations are unexplained and are a clear indication that there is still a great deal to discover about the function and biology of androgen receptors.

Androgen receptor and mechanism of androgen action

Androgen receptor is the intracellular protein that mediates biological actions of physiological androgens (testosterone and 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone). Androgen receptor belongs to a large family of ligand-dependent proteins whose function is to modulate expression of genes and gene networks in a cell- and tissue-specific manner. The present overview describes the structurally important domains of the receptor protein, and discusses several aspects in the structure-function relationship, using naturally occurring receptor mutants in androgen insensitivity patients or experimental animals as examples. In addition, characteristics of androgen receptor expressed in a heterologous system are described, and their potential usefulness in specific molecular studies discussed.