Interaction between G-actin and myosin subfragment-1 probed by covalent cross-linking

Covalent and non-covalent chemical engineering of actin for biotechnological applications

The cytoskeletal filaments are self-assembled protein polymers with 8-25nm diameters and up to several tens of micrometres length. They have a range of pivotal roles in eukaryotic cells, including transportation of intracellular cargoes (primarily microtubules with dynein and kinesin motors) and cell motility (primarily actin and myosin) where muscle contraction is one example. For two decades, the cytoskeletal filaments and their associated motor systems have been explored for nanotechnological applications including miniaturized sensor systems and lab-on-a-chip devices. Several developments have also revolved around possible exploitation of the filaments alone without their motor partners. Efforts to use the cytoskeletal filaments for applications often require chemical or genetic engineering of the filaments such as specific conjugation with fluorophores, antibodies, oligonucleotides or various macromolecular complexes e.g. nanoparticles. Similar conjugation methods are also instrumental for a range of fundamental biophysical studies. Here we review methods for non-covalent and covalent chemical modifications of actin filaments with focus on critical advantages and challenges of different methods as well as critical steps in the conjugation procedures. We also review potential uses of the engineered actin filaments in nanotechnological applications and in some key fundamental studies of actin and myosin function. Finally, we consider possible future lines of investigation that may be addressed by applying chemical conjugation of actin in new ways.

Expression of Y53A-actin in Dictyostelium disrupts the cytoskeleton and inhibits intracellular and intercellular chemotactic signaling

We showed previously that phosphorylation of Tyr(53), or its mutation to Ala, inhibits actin polymerization in vitro with formation of aggregates of short filaments, and that expression of Y53A-actin in Dictyostelium blocks differentiation and development at the mound stage (Liu, X., Shu, S., Hong, M. S., Levine, R. L., and Korn, E. D. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 13694-13699; Liu, X., Shu, S., Hong, M. S., Yu, B., and Korn, E. D. (2010) J. Biol. Chem. 285, 9729-9739). We now show that expression of Y53A-actin, which does not affect cell growth, phagocytosis, or pinocytosis, inhibits the formation of head-to-tail cell streams during cAMP-induced aggregation, although individual amoebae chemotax normally. We show that expression of Y53A-actin causes a 50% reduction of cell surface cAMP receptors, and inhibits cAMP-induced increases in adenylyl cyclase A activity, phosphorylation of ERK2, and actin polymerization. Trafficking of vesicles containing adenylyl cyclase A to the rear of the cell and secretion of the ACA vesicles are also inhibited. The actin cytoskeleton of cells expressing Y53A-actin is characterized by numerous short filaments, and bundled and aggregated filaments similar to the structures formed by copolymerization of purified Y53A-actin and wild-type actin in vitro. This disorganized actin cytoskeleton may be responsible for the inhibition of intracellular and intercellular cAMP signaling in cells expressing F-Y53A-actin.

Mechanism of actin polymerization by myosin subfragment-1 probed by dynamic light scattering

Monomeric actin (G-actin) polymerizes spontaneously into helical filaments in the presence of inorganic salts. The slowest, rate-limiting step of the polymerization process is formation of actin trimers, the smallest oligomers that serve as nuclei for fast filament growth (filament elongation) by monomer addition at the filament ends. In low ionic-strength solutions, actin can be polymerized by myosin subfragment-1 (S1). In early works it has been suggested that G-actin-S1 1:1 complexes (GS) assemble into filaments according to the nucleation-filament elongation scheme. Subsequent studies indicated that one S1 molecule can bind two actin monomers, and that oligomerization of the initial complexes is a fast reaction. This has led to suggest an alternative mechanism, with a ternary G(2)S complex and its oligomers being predominant intermediates of S1-induced assembly of G-actin into filaments. We used dynamic light scattering to analyze the initial steps of S1-induced polymerization of actin. Our results suggest formation of GS complexes and their oligomers in the presence of S1 equimolar to or in excess over actin. We confirm formation of G(2)S complexes as intermediates of S1-induced polymerization in the presence of actin in excess over S1.

A recombinant human RNASET2 glycoprotein with antitumorigenic and antiangiogenic characteristics

BACKGROUND

Human RNASET2 is a T2-RNase glycoprotein encoded by the RNASET2 gene, which is located on chromosome 6 (6q27). Deletion in 6q27 is associated with several human malignancies.

METHODS

A synthetic RNASET2 gene that was optimized for expression in the yeast Pichia pastoris was designed according to the cDNA sequence and was cloned under the control of the methanol-induced promoter fused to the alpha-mating secretion peptide. The recombinant protein was purified from the culture supernatant of transformed P. pastoris through an affinity Sepharose-concanavalin A column. Actin-binding activity was examined by membrane blotting using monoclonal mouse antiactin immunoglobulin M and by cross-linking in solution to G-actin using 1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-3-ethyl-carboimide methiodide. The antiangiogenic activity of RNASET2 (from 0.5 microM to 10 microM) was assessed by a human umbilical vein endothelial (HUVE) cell assay in the presence of 1 microg/mL angiogenin, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), or recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Cell colony formation was examined in human colon HT29 cancer cells to assess the antitumorigenic activity of RNASET2 or the enzymatic-inactivated RNASET2 (EI-RNASET2) (1 microM each). In an athymic mouse xenograft model, LS174T human cancer cells were injected subcutaneously. When tumors were palpable, the mice were treated for 3 weeks with RNASET2 (1 mg/kg), paclitaxel (10 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg), or a combination of the 2 drugs.

RESULTS

The recombinant RNASET2 was identified as a 27-kilodalton glycoprotein that possessed the ability to bind actin in vitro. RNASET2 significantly inhibited clonogenicity in HT29 cells. EI-RNASET2 produced a similar effect, suggesting that its antitumorigenic activity is unrelated to its RNase activity. In HUVE cells, RNASET2 inhibited angiogenin-, bFGF-, and VEGF-induced tube formation in a dose-dependent manner. In athymic mice, RNASET2 inhibited the development of an LS174T-derived xenograft by 40%. A synergistic effect was obtained with combined RNASET2 and paclitaxel treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results suggested that RNASET2 represents a new class of antitumorigenic and antiangiogenic drugs, and the findings of this study emphasize the advantage of using agents like RNASET2 in combined therapy.

Role of actin DNase-I-binding loop in myosin subfragment 1-induced polymerization of G-actin: implications for the mechanism of polymerization

Proteolytic cleavage of actin between Gly(42) and Val(43) within its DNase-I-binding loop (D-loop) abolishes the ability of Ca-G-actin to spontaneously polymerize in the presence of KCl. Here we show that such modified actin is assembled into filaments, albeit at a lower rate than unmodified actin, by myosin subfragment 1 (S1) carrying the A1 essential light chain but not by S1(A2). S1 titration of pyrene-G-actin showed a diminished affinity of cleaved actin for S1, but this could be compensated for by using S1 in excess. The most significant effect of the cleavage, revealed by measuring the fluorescence of pyrene-actin and light-scattering intensities as a function of actin concentration at saturating concentrations of S1, is strong inhibition of association of G-actin-S1 complexes into oligomers. Measurements of the fluorescence of dansyl cadaverine attached to Gln(41) indicate substantial inhibition of the initial association of G-actin-S1 into longitudinal dimers. The data provide experimental evidence for the critical role of D-loop conformation in both longitudinal and lateral, cross-strand actin-actin contact formation in the nucleation reaction. Electron microscopic analysis of the changes in filament-length distribution during polymerization of actin by S1(A1) and S1(A2) suggests that the mechanism of S1-induced polymerization is not substantially different from the nucleation-elongation scheme of spontaneous actin polymerization.

Expression of a nonpolymerizable actin mutant in Sf9 cells

We have succeeded in expressing actin in the baculovirus/Sf9 cell system in high yield. The wild-type (WT) actin is functionally indistinguishable from tissue-purified actin in its ability to activate ATPase activity and to support movement in an in vitro motility assay. Having achieved this feat, we used a mutational strategy to express a monomeric actin that is incapable of polymerization. Native actin requires actin binding proteins or chemical modification to maintain it in a monomeric state. The mutant actin sediments in the analytical ultracentrifuge as a homogeneous monomeric species of 3.2 S in 100 mM KCl and 2 mM MgCl(2), conditions that cause WT actin to polymerize. The two point mutations that render actin nonpolymerizable are in subdomain 4 (A204E/P243K; "AP-actin"), distant from the myosin binding site. AP-actin binds to skeletal myosin subfragment 1 (S1) and forms a homogeneous complex as demonstrated by analytical ultracentrifugation. The ATPase activity of a cross-linked AP-actin.S1 complex is higher than that of S1 alone, although less than that supported by filamentous actin (F-actin). AP-Actin is an excellent candidate for structural studies of complexes of actin with motor proteins and other actin-binding proteins.

Characterization of three regulatory states of the striated muscle thin filament

The troponin-tropomyosin-linked regulation of striated muscle contraction occurs through allosteric control by both Ca(2+) and myosin. The thin filament fluctuates between two extreme states: the inactive "off" state and the active "on" state. Intermediate states have been proposed from structural studies and transient kinetic measurements. However, in contrast to the well-characterised, on and off states, the mechanochemical properties of the intermediate states are much less well understood because of the instability of those states. In the present study, we have characterized a myosin-induced intermediate that is stabilized by cross-linking myosin motor domains (S1) to actin filaments (with a maximum of one S1 molecule for 50 actin monomers). A single S1 molecule is known to interact with two adjacent actin monomers. A detailed analysis revealed that thin filaments containing S1 molecules cross-linked to just one actin monomer (actin(1)-S1 complexes) are regulated with a 79% inhibition of the ATPase in the absence of Ca(2+). In contrast, filaments containing S1 molecules cross-linked at two positions, to two adjacent actin monomers (actin(2)-S1 complexes) totally lose their regulation in a highly cooperative manner. This loss of regulation was due both to an enhancement of the ATPase activity without calcium and an inhibition of the ATPase with calcium. Filaments containing actin(2)-S1 complexes, with significant ATPase activity in the absence of calcium (about 50%), did not move on a myosin-coated surface unless calcium was present. This partial uncoupling between the ATPase activity and in vitro motility in the absence of calcium demonstrates that the mechanical steps require actin-myosin contacts, which take place only in the on state and not in the off or intermediate states. These data provide new insights concerning the difference in cooperativity of Ca(2+) regulation that exists between the biochemical and mechanical cycles of the actin-myosin motor.

Interaction of myosin with F-actin: time-dependent changes at the interface are not slow

The kinetics of formation of the actin-myosin complex have been reinvestigated on the minute and second time scales in sedimentation and chemical cross-linking experiments. With the sedimentation method, we found that the binding of the skeletal muscle myosin motor domain (S1) to actin filament always saturates at one S1 bound to one actin monomer (or two S1 per actin dimer), whether S1 was added slowly (17 min between additions) or rapidly (10 s between additions) to an excess of F-actin. The carbodiimide (1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide, EDC)-induced cross-linking of the actin-S1 complex was performed on the subsecond time scale by a new approach that combines a two-step cross-linking protocol with the rapid flow-quench technique. The results showed that the time courses of S1 cross-linking to either of the two actin monomers are identical: they are not dependent on the actin/S1 ratio in the 0.3-20-s time range. The overall data rule out a mechanism by which myosin rolls from one to the other actin monomer on the second or minute time scales. Rather, they suggest that more subtle changes occur at the actomyosin interface during the ATP cycle.

Filament assembly from profilin-actin

Profilin plays a major role in the assembly of actin filament at the barbed ends. The thermodynamic and kinetic parameters for barbed end assembly from profilin-actin have been measured turbidimetrically. Filament growth from profilin-actin requires MgATP to be bound to actin. No assembly is observed from profilin-CaATP-actin. The rate constant for association of profilin-actin to barbed ends is 30% lower than that of actin, and the critical concentration for F-actin assembly from profilin-actin units is 0.3 microM under physiological ionic conditions. Barbed ends grow from profilin-actin with an ADP-Pi cap. Profilin does not cap the barbed ends and is not detectably incorporated into filaments. The EDC-cross-linked profilin-actin complex (PAcov) both copolymerizes with F-actin and undergoes spontaneous self-assembly, following a nucleation-growth process characterized by a critical concentration of 0.2 microM under physiological conditions. The PAcov polymer is a helical filament that displays the same diffraction pattern as F-actin, with layer lines at 6 and 36 nm. The PAcov filaments bound phalloidin with the same kinetics as F-actin, bound myosin subfragment-1, and supported actin-activated ATPase of myosin subfragment-1, but they did not translocate in vitro along myosin-coated glass surfaces. These results are discussed in light of the current models of actin structure.

Effect of ATP analogues on the actin-myosin interface

The interaction between skeletal myosin subfragment 1 (S1) and filamentous actin was examined at various intermediate states of the actomyosin ATPase cycle by chemical cross-linking experiments. Reaction of the actin-S1 complex with 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide and N-hydroxysuccinimide generated products with molecular masses of 165 and 175 kDa, in which S1 loops of residues 626-647 and 567-578 were cross-linked independently to the N-terminal segment of residues 1-12 of one actin monomer, and of 265 kDa, in which the two loops were bound to the N termini of two adjacent monomers. In strong-binding complexes, i.e., without nucleotide or with ADP, S1 was sequentially cross-linked to one and then to two actin monomers. In the weak-binding complexes, two types of cross-linking pattern were observed. First, during steady-state hydrolysis of ATP or ATPgammaS at 20 degreesC, the cross-linking reaction gave rise to a small amount of unknown 200 kDa product. Second, in the presence of AMPPNP, ADP.BeFx, ADP.AlF4-, or ADP.VO43- or with S1 internally cross-linked by N,N'-p-phenylenedimaleimide, only the 265 kDa product was obtained. The presence of 200 mM salt inhibited cross-linking reactions in both weak- and strong-binding states, while it dissociated only weak-binding complexes. These results indicate that, in the weak-binding state populated with the ADP.Pi analogues, skeletal S1 interacts predominantly and with an apparent equal affinity with the N termini of two adjacent actin monomers, while these ionic contacts are much less significant in stabilizing the rigor actin-S1 complexes. They also suggest that the electrostatic actin-S1 interface is not influenced by the type of ADP.Pi analogue bound to the active site.

Transglutaminase-induced cross-linking between subdomain 2 of G-actin and the 636-642 lysine-rich loop of myosin subfragment 1

G-actin was covalently cross-linked with S1 in a bacterial transglutaminase-catalyzed reaction. The cross-linking sites were identified with the help of fluorescent probes and limited proteolysis as the Gln-41 on the DNase I binding loop of subdomain 2 in G-actin and a lysine-rich loop (residues 636-642) on the S1 heavy chain. The same lysine-rich loop was cross-linked to another region of G-actin in a former study (Combeau, C., D. Didry, and M-F. Carlier. 1992. J. Biol. Chem. 267:14038-14046). This indicates the existence of more than one G-actin-S1 complex. In contrast to G-actin, no cross-linking was induced between F-actin and S1 by the transglutaminase reaction. This shows that in F-actin the inner part of the DNase I binding loop, where Gln-41 is located, is not accessible for S1. The cross-linked G-actin-S1 polymerized upon addition of 2 mM MgCl2 as indicated by electron microscopy and sedimentation experiments. The filaments obtained from the polymerization of cross-linked actin and S1 were much shorter than the control actin filaments. The ATPase activity of the cross-linked S1 was not activated by actin, whereas the K+ (EDTA)-activated ATPase activity of S1 was unaffected by the cross-linking. The cross-linking between G-actin and S1 was not influenced by the exchange of the tightly bound calcium to magnesium; however, it was inhibited by the exchange of the actin-bound ATP to ADP. This finding supports the view that the structure of the DNase binding loop in ADP-G-actin is somewhere between the structures of ATP-G-actin and F-actin.

Analysis of protein aggregates by combination of cross-linking reactions and chromatographic separations

Chemical cross-linking provides a method that covalently bridges near-neighbour associations within proteins and protein aggregates. Combined with chromatographic separations and protein-chemical methods, it may be used to localize and to investigate three-dimensional relations as present under natural conditions. This paper reviews the chemistry and application of cross-linking reagents and the development of combination experimental approaches in view of chromatographic separations and cross-linking reactions. Investigations of homooligomeric and heterooligomeric protein associations as well as conformational analysis are presented.

Kinetics of myosin subfragment-1-induced condensation of G-actin into oligomers, precursors in the assembly of F-actin-S1. Role of the tightly bound metal ion and ATP hydrolysis

In a low ionic strength buffer and in the absence of free ATP, the interaction of G-actin (G) with myosin subfragment-1 (S1) leads to the formation of arrowhead-decorated F-actin-S1 filaments, through a series of elementary steps. The initial formation of GS and G2S complexes is followed by their condensation into short oligomers. The kinetics of formation of G-actin-S1 oligomers have been monitored in a stopped-flow apparatus using a combination of light scattering and fluorescence of NBD-labeled actin. Oligomers appear more stable and are formed at a faster rate from MgATP-G-actin than from CaATP-G-actin. The actin-bound ATP is hydrolyzed when oligomers are formed from MgATP-G-actin, not when they are formed from CaATP-G-actin. The formation of oligomers is energetically favored in the presence of cytochalasin D. All data are consistent with the view that the actin-actin interactions which take place upon condensation of GS and G2S into oligomers are very similar to lateral actin-actin interactions along the short pitch helix of actin filaments, which are involved in actin nucleation. These interactions trigger ATP hydrolysis on actin.

A myosin head can interact with two chemically modified G-actin monomers at ATP-modulated multiple sites

It has been reported that chemically modified [with m-maleimidobenzoic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (MBS)] actin maintains its monomeric form and retains the ability to bind (and make chemical cross-links) to myosin head [Bettache, N., Bertrand, R., & Kassab, R. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 6028-6032; Arata, T. (1991) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 109, 335-340]. Here, the interaction between MBS-G-actin and myosin subfragment 1 (S1) has been further studied by proteolytic susceptibility and chemical cross-linking. Two moles of MBS-actin monomers bound to 1 mol of myosin heads or S1 with different affinities. The first binding of MBS-G-actin to S1 strongly protected a 27-kDa/50-kDa junction of S1 heavy chain from trypsin digestion and also weakly protected a 50-kDa/20-kDa junction. The second binding protected a 50-kDa/20-kDa junction more strongly. ATP weakened these bindings more than 10-fold. MBS-G-actin was cross-linked to S1 by 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-carbodiimide, producing the 175-185-kDa doublet bands similar to those of F-actin and S1. The first binding produced a complex migrating at 175 kDa on gels [Hozumi, T. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 10071-10073] and the second binding further produced an 185-kDa complex, suggesting that two binding sites correspond to two spatially separated cross-linking sites. MBS-G-actin was also cross-linked by MBS to S1 when the first actin binds, producing only 180-kDa complex. In the presence of ATP or ADP, an 140-kDa complex was produced together with the 180-kDa complex, suggesting shifting of the binding site.

The ternary complex of DNase I, actin and thymosin beta4

We have recently described a method for identifying contact sites between actin and thymosin beta4 (Tbeta4) by following spectrophotometrically the extent and kinetics of distinct, thiol-specific crosslinking reactions between appropriate derivatives of the two proteins [Reichert et a]. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1301-1308]. In the present study this method was used to show that such crosslinking, which is indicative of complex formation, occurs to the same extent with the actin-DNase I complex as with pure actin, although at a somewhat lower rate. Further evidence for the formation of the ternary complex was given by gel electrophoresis. From fluorescence spectroscopy the KD value of Tbeta4 from the actin-DNase I complex was found to be identical to that from pure actin. In line with these data, the capacity of actin for inhibiting DNase I was not affected by the addition of Tbeta4. In conclusion, DNase I and Tbeta4 are independent of each other in their interaction with actin, suggesting that the binding sites of thymosin beta4 and DNase I on actin do not overlap. A ternary complex of DNase I, actin and Tbeta4, if obtained in crystalline form, could thus provide an approach for studying the interface of Tbeta4 and actin by X-ray analysis.

Kinetics of association of myosin subfragment-1 to unlabeled and pyrenyl-labeled actin

The kinetics of reaction of myosin subfragment-1 (S1) with F-actin have been monitored by the changes in light scattering and in pyrenyl-actin fluorescence at 20 degrees C, pH 7.5, and physiological ionic strength. The association rate constant of S1 to F-actin decreases about 10-fold as the molar ratio of bound S1 increases from 0 to 1. This decrease in k+ is most likely due to the steric hindrance of available binding sites by initially bound S1. The apparent rate constant for association of S1 to bare filaments is 9 microM-1 s-1, a value 1 order of magnitude higher than the one previously estimated from experiments in which S1 was in excess over F-actin. The anticooperative binding kinetics of S1 to F-actin are consistent with the negative cooperativity displayed in the equilibrium binding curves of S1 to pyrenyl-F-actin. Fluorescence titration curves of partially labeled pyrenyl-F-actin by S1 are sigmoidal, consistent with a 4-fold higher affinity of S1 for unlabeled than for labeled action. This conclusion is strengthened by kinetic data of S1 binding to partially labeled F-actin, which exhibit a biphasic behavior due to the slower dissociation of S1 from unlabeled than from labeled actin.

Kinetics of the interaction of myosin subfragment-1 with G-actin. Effect of nucleotides and DNaseI

The kinetics of interaction of monomeric pyrenyl-labeled G-actin with myosin subfragment-1 (S1 (A1) and S1(A2) isomers) has been examined in the stopped-flow at low ionic strength. The data confirm the previously reported existence of binary GS and ternary G2S complexes. The increase in pyrenyl-actin fluorescence which monitors the G-actin-S1 interactions is linked to the isomerization of these complexes following rapid equilibrium binding steps. The rates of isomerization are approximately 200 s-1 for GS and approximately 50 s-1 for G2S at 4 degrees C and in the absence of ATP. DNaseI and S1 bind G-actin essentially in a mutually exclusive fashion. Both GS and G2S are dissociated by MgATP and MgADP. The kinetics and mechanism of ATP-induced dissociation of G2S are quantitatively close to the ATP-induced dissociation of F-actin-S1, which indicates the G2S is a good model for the F-actin-S1 interface. GS and G2S display different kinetic behaviors in response to nucleotides, GS being less efficiently dissociated than G2S by MgATP. This result suggests that different mechanical properties of the cross-bridge might correlate with different orientations of the myosin head and different actin/myosin binding ratios.

Actin and the actomyosin interface: a review

This review deals with the structure of the actin monomer, its assembly into filaments and the loci on F-actin involved in binding myosin. Two distinctly different arrangements of monomers have been suggested for actin filaments. One model proposed by Holmes et al. is well developed. It places the so-called 'large' domain close to the filament axis and the so-called 'small' domain out near the surface of the filament. A second, less-well developed, model proposed by Schutt et al. locates the 'small' domain close to the filament axis and they rotate the monomer so that 'bottom' of the 'large' domain is at the highest radius. We analyze the available evidence for the models of F-actin derived from X-ray diffraction, reconstructions from electron micrographs, fluorescence resonance energy transfer spectroscopy, chemical cross-linking, antibody probes, limited proteolysis, site-directed and natural mutations, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and other techniques. The result is an actin-centered view of the loci on actin which are probably involved in its interaction with the myosin 'head'. From these multiple contacts we speculate on the sequence of steps between the initial weak-binding state of S-1 to the actin filament through to the stable strong-binding state seen in the absence of free Mg-ATP, i.e., the rigor state.

Polymerization of actin from the thymosin beta 4 complex initiated by the addition of actin nuclei, nuclei stabilizing agents or myosin S1

Thymosin beta 4 forms a 1:1 complex with actin and thereby prevents polymerization. Rapid formation of filaments from this complex was observed, however, when actin trimers were added. Polymerization can likewise be initiated by the addition of one equivalent of phalloidin or, less effectively, cytochalasin B. Since both toxins, which reportedly support nucleation, have similar effects as the covalently linked actin trimers, it appears that the formation of filaments from the actin-thymosin beta 4 complex depends on the availability of stable actin nuclei. Remarkably, rapid polymerization was also observed if small amounts of myosin S1 were added, suggesting that also myosin, a protein functionally connected with polymeric actin, can serve as a nucleation center. Considering the existence of thymosin beta 4 and related peptides in numerous mammalian tissues, our data suggest that spontaneous formation of microfilaments in non-muscle cells may be regulated at the level of nucleation. Uncontrolled polymerization induced by the formation of phalloidin-stabilized nuclei may explain the acute toxic effects of phalloidin in hepatocytes.

Actin polymerization: regulation by divalent metal ion and nucleotide binding, ATP hydrolysis and binding of myosin

Actin filaments are major dynamic components of the cytoskeleton of eukaryotic cells. Assembly of filaments from monomeric actin occurs with expenditure of energy, the tightly bound ATP being irreversibly hydrolyzed during polymerization. This dissipation of energy perturbs the laws of reversible helical polymerization defined by Oosawa and Asakura (1975), and affects the dynamics of actin filaments. We have shown that ATP hydrolysis destabilizes actin-actin interactions in the filament. The destabilization is linked to the liberation of Pi that follows cleavage of gamma-phosphate. Pi release therefore plays the role of a conformational switch. Because ATP hydrolysis is uncoupled from polymerization, the nucleotide content of the filaments changes during the polymerization process, and filaments grow with a stabilizing "cap" of terminal ADP-Pi subunits. The fact that the dynamic properties of F-actin are affected by ATP hydrolysis results in a non-linear dependence of the rate of filament elongation on monomer concentration. Possible modes of regulation of filament assembly may be anticipated from the basic properties of actin. We have shown that the tightly bound divalent metal ion (Ca2+ or Mg2+) interacts with the beta- and gamma-phosphates of ATP bound to actin, and that the Me-ATP bidentate chelate is bound to G-actin in the A configuration. The nature of the bound metal ion affects the conformation of actin and the rate of ATP hydrolysis. In motile living cells, a large pool of actin is maintained unpolymerized by interaction with G-actin binding proteins such as thymosin beta 4 and its variants or profilin. Part of this pool is released to increase the F-actin pool upon cell stimulation. The role of G-actin polymerizing proteins may be crucial in defining the patterns of filament assembly in these situations. The myosin head (myosin subfragment-1) may be considered as a model actin polymerizing protein, may be the closest model to the short tailed myosin I family. The mechanism of assembly of decorated filaments from G-actin and myosin subfragment-1 has therefore been examined.

Interaction and polymerization of the G-actin-myosin head complex: effect of DNase I

The properties of polymerization and interaction of the G-actin-myosin S1 complexes (formed with either the S1(A1) or the S1(A2) isoform) have been studied by light-scattering and fluorescence measurements in the absence and in the presence of DNase I. In the absence of DNase I, the G-actin-S1(A1) and G-actin-S1(A2) complexes were found to be characterized by different limiting concentrations (l.c.), defined as the complex concentrations above which the polymerization occurs spontaneously within 20 h at 20 degrees C in a "no salt" buffer (l.c. = 0.42 and 8.8 microM for G-actin-S1(A1) and G-actin-S1(A2), respectively). The occurrence of a limiting concentration for either complex together with the kinetic properties of the polymerization led us to conclude that the G-actin-S1 polymerization occurs via a nucleation-elongation process. Fluorescence titrations and proteolysis experiments revealed that G-actin interacts with S1 with a 1:1 stoichiometry (independently of the presence of ATP) with dissociation constants, in the absence of nucleotide, of 20 and 50 nM for the G-actin-S1(A1) and G-actin-S1(A2) complexes, respectively. In the presence of at least a 1.5-fold excess of DNase I, the polymerization of the G-actin-S1 complexes was blocked even at high protein concentration or in the presence of salts. In addition, the affinity of either S1 isoform to actin was reduced 4-5-fold by DNase I, while the stoichiometry of the G-actin-S1 complexes was not changed. However, since the dissociation constants remain in the submicromolar range, we could demonstrate the existence of ternary DNase I-G-actin-S1 complexes stable under polymerizing conditions. Finally, the study of the effect of nucleotides and of various salts on the G-actin-S1 interaction further showed significant differences between the G-actin-S1 and F-actin-S1 interactions.

Actin molecular structure and function

The understanding of actin structure and function has been improved by comparing the atomic structure of G-actin, the model of the F-actin structure, and the properties of actin mutants. Several aspects of actin structure have been tested and good progress has been made in mapping its myosin-binding sites. The dynamic properties of actin and genetic evaluation of its cellular function are attracting increasing attention.

Conformational changes in subdomain-2 of G-actin upon polymerization into F-actin and upon binding myosin subfragment-1

The susceptibility of subdomain-2 of actin to different proteases has been examined, for G-actin, F-actin, G-actin-S1(A2) and F-actin-S1(A2) complexes on a comparative basis. The sites of subtilisin, alpha-chymotrypsin and trypsin attack, exposed on G-actin, are protected in F-actin, F-actin-S1(A2) as well as in the G-actin-S1(A2) complex. In contrast, a new cleavage site (Arg39-His40) for ArgC protease, which is protected in G-actin, is exposed in G-actin-S1(A2) as well as in F-actin and F-actin-S1(A2). These results are consistent with the previously proposed structural analogy between the ternary (G-actin)2S1 and the F-actin-S1 complexes, and provide information on the mechanism of S1-induced polymerization of G-actin.

Structural basis for the destabilization of F-actin by phosphate release following ATP hydrolysis

The role of ATP hydrolysis in actin polymerization has been a puzzle, since it is known that polymer formation is possible without the ATPase activity and that the ATPase lags behind polymerization. We have used beryllium fluoride and G-ADP actin monomers to form F-ADP-BeF3- filaments that are a stable analog for either the ATP or the ADP-P(i) state. Electron microscopy and computed three-dimensional reconstruction have been used to compare this state to control actin, F-ADP, polymerized from G-ATP. We find, at a high degree of statistical significance, that subdomain-2 of the actin protomer in the ADP-BeF3- state is in a conformation very similar to that found in the atomic model for F-actin of Holmes and co-workers, but becomes disordered after the release of the phosphate. This breaks one of the longitudinal bonds in the filament, consistent with biochemical observations that phosphate release destabilizes F-actin. We have also found that lithium, which reduces the dissociation rate constant of actin filaments, induces a structural state indistinguishable from that of ADP-BeF3-. Further, in all states about ten C-terminal residues are displaced from the above mentioned model, but that the fit of the rest of the monomer is in excellent agreement, supporting the uniqueness of the solution they found and precluding a significantly different arrangement of the actin monomer in the filament.