Secreted and cellular proteochondroitin sulfates of a human B lymphoblastoid cell line contain different protein cores

Cellular specificity for the activation of fibroblast growth factor-2 by heparan sulfate proteoglycan

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) promote cellular proliferation through interaction with FGF-2. To examine the role of cellular specificity of HSPG in FGF-2 function, a recombinant soluble isoform of CD44 (rsCD44v3,8-10) was expressed in various cell types; 293 T fibroblasts, the epithelial carcinoma cell lines A431 and HOTZ, the myelomonocytic cell line THP-1, and the Ig-secreting B lymphoblast IM9. The capacity of the recombinant HSPGs expressed in these cell lines to bind and present FGF-2 to the high-affinity receptor FGFR1 was addressed. This novel approach showed a minor difference in the binding and in the FGF-2 stimulating activity of rsCD44v3,8-10 HSPGs from fibroblasts and epithelial cells. However, FGF-2 binding of rsCD44v3,8-10 from IM9 and THP-1 cells was significantly lower, and stimulation of FGF-2 by rsCD44v3,8-10 from these two cell types could not be detected. We tested the possibility that the differences among cell types were related to the functional profile of endogenous HSPGs. The initial survey of a wider panel of cell types revealed high levels of HSPGs synthesis on the surface of 293 T, epithelial and IM9 cells, but low levels on the surface of other cells of hematopoietic origin. Surprisingly, native HSPGs from fibroblasts and epithelial cell lines promoted FGF-2 biological activity to vastly different extents, and cell surface HSPGs from IM9 cells induced an FGF-2 response. Altogether, the results suggested a role for cell-specific HS modification in addition to synthesis as regulatory mechanisms for the cellular specificity of proteoglycan function.

Differential release of proteoglycans during human B lymphocyte maturation

Proteoglycans interact with soluble proteins such as growth factors and thereby regulate extracellular signals. During B lymphocyte maturation, secretion of proteoglycans may be functionally related to the different requirements of the respective maturation stage. In order to address this question we compared structures of proteoglycans released by three B lymphocyte lines which correspond to different maturation stages. Plasma-cell type U266 cells secreted the largest proteoglycans (150 kDa), followed by mature B cells JOK-1 (130 kDa) and pre-B cells Nalm 6 (90 kDa). On average, secreted proteoglycans carried four glycosaminoglycan chains with molecular masses ranging each from 32 kDa (U266) to 23 kDa (Nalm 6). All three cell lines secreted more than 90% of their proteoglycans possessing chondroitin sulfate chains having chondroitin-4-sulfate (delta Di-4S) as the prevalent disaccharide unit. In these proteochondroitin sulfates, unsulfated chondroitin (delta Di-0S) was present in smaller quantities and chondroitin-6-sulfate (delta Di-6S)-containing proteoglycan was released only by Nalm 6 and U266 cells. Cell line Nalm 6 exclusively produced proteochondroitin sulfate, whereas in culture medium of JOK-1 and U266 a small amount of proteoheparan sulfate was found also. In all three cell lines, treatment with chondroitinase ABC released a protein of 30 kDa and chemical deglycosylation resulted in a core protein of 21 kDa. In addition to pure proteochondroitin sulfate, a small portion of proteoheparan sulfate with a protein moiety of 30 kDa was detected after heparitinase treatment in supernatants of JOK-1 and U266. Thus, our results indicate that released proteoglycans may undergo modulations in their glycosaminoglycan moieties during B-cell differentiation. This may have functional consequences at the level of growth factor regulation.

Modulated glycosylation of proteoglycans during differentiation of human B lymphocytes

Proteoglycans are mediators of cellular adhesion and regulate growth factor activities. Proteoglycans of B lymphocytes undergo structural changes during B cell ontogeny which may correspond to the specific requirements of the respective microenvironment of the maturing cell. We analyzed three human B cell lines representing pre-B cells (Nalm-6), activated B cells (Jok-1) and plasma cells (U266) for their cellular proteoglycans. Gel filtration of the 35S-labeled macromolecules of the three cell lines revealed an increase in size in the order Nalm-6 < Jok-1 < U266. In Jok-1 and U266 cells the major pool of proteoglycans consisted of proteochondroitin sulfates of 50 to 90 kDa. These proteolglycans carried a protein core of approx. 30 kDa to which 1 to 3 glycosaminoglycan chains in the range of 28 to 32 kDa were attached. In Nalm-6 cells only free chondroitin sulfate chains of 23 kDa, but no intact proteoglycans, were detected. Chondroitin sulfate chains were predominantly composed of chondroitin-4-sulfate, those of Nalm-6 and U266 cells additionally contained 10-20% of unsulfated disaccharides. In U266 cells 30% of glycosaminoglycans consisted of heparan sulfate either bound to pure proteoheparan sulfate or to chondroitin sulfate/heparan sulfate hybrid-proteoglycans. Earlier, syndecan-1 was described as a hybrid proteoglycan containing heparan sulfate/chondroitin sulfate chains which is transcribed by murine B cells at early and late maturation stages. In order to see whether syndecan is transcribed by the human B cell lines used here, we measured expression of syndecan mRNA by the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Similar to murine lymphocytes, syndecan-specific mRNA was detected in Nalm-6 and U266 cells, equivalent to early and late B cells, but not in lymphoblastoid Jok-1 cells. However, Nalm-6 cells do not produce proteoheparan sulfate. In these cells, syndecan synthesis may be blocked at the translational level. Also, the proteoglycans of U266 are different from syndecan-1 in their composition of glycosaminoglycans and in size of protein cores. Together, these results indicate that the major pool of proteoglycans produced by human B cells consists of proteochondroitin sulfate and additionally in later stages of a smaller proportion of proteoheparan sulfate which is not identical to syndecan-1. During distinct phases of B cell differentiation, modulations in the glycosaminoglycan moiety concerning size and sulfation of glycosaminoglycan chains were also found.

Isolation and purification of proteoglycans

Purification of a protein typically involves development of a quantitative assay to track protein integrity (e.g. enzyme activity) during subsequent isolation steps. The generalized procedure involves choosing the source of the protein, defining extraction conditions, developing bulk purification methods followed by refined, more selective methods. The purification of proteoglycans is often complicated by a) limited source quantities, b) necessity of chaotrophic solvents for efficient extraction, c) their large molecular size and d) lack of defined functions to enable purity (i.e. activity, conformation) to be assessed. Because the usual goal of proteoglycan purification is physical characterization (intact molecular weight, core protein and glycosaminoglycan class and size), the problems of a suitable assay and/or native conformation are avoided. The 'assay' for tracking proteoglycan isolation typically utilizes uronic acid content or radiolabel incorporation as a marker. Once extracted from their cellular/extracellular environment, proteoglycans can be isolated by density gradient centrifugation and/or column chromatography techniques. Recent advances in the composition of chromatographic supports have enabled the application of ion-exchange, gel permeation, hydrophobic interaction and affinity chromatography resins using efficient high-pressure liquid chromatography to proteoglycan purification.

Isolation and purification of proteoglycans

Purification of a protein typically involves development of a quantitative assay to track protein integrity (e.g. enzyme activity) during subsequent isolation steps. The generalized procedure involves choosing the source of the protein, defining extraction conditions, developing bulk purification methods followed by refined, more selective methods. The purification of proteoglycans is often complicated by a) limited source quantities, b) necessity of chaotropic solvents for efficient extraction, c) their large molecular size and d) lack of defined functions to enable purity (i.e. activity, conformation) to be assessed. Because the usual goal of proteoglycan purification is physical characterization (intact molecular weight, core protein and glycosaminoglycan class and size), the problems of a suitable assay and/or native conformation are avoided. The 'assay' for tracking proteoglycan isolation typically utilizes uronic acid content or radiolabel incorporation as a marker. Once extracted from their cellular/extracellular environment, proteoglycans can be isolated by density gradient centrifugation and/or column chromatography techniques. Recent advances in the composition of chromatographic supports have enabled the application of ion-exchange, gel permeation, hydrophobic interaction and affinity chromatography resins using efficient high-pressure liquid chromatography to proteoglycan purification.