DNA distortion and nucleation of local DNA unwinding within sigma-54 (sigma N) holoenzyme closed promoter complexes

A general mechanism for transcription bubble nucleation in bacteria

Bacterial transcription initiation requires σ factors for nucleation of the transcription bubble. The canonical housekeeping σ factor, σ70, nucleates DNA melting via recognition of conserved bases of the promoter -10 motif, which are unstacked and captured in pockets of σ70. By contrast, the mechanism of transcription bubble nucleation and formation during the unrelated σN-mediated transcription initiation is poorly understood. Herein, we combine structural and biochemical approaches to establish that σN, like σ70, captures a flipped, unstacked base in a pocket formed between its N-terminal region I (RI) and extra-long helix features. Strikingly, RI inserts into the nascent bubble to stabilize the nucleated bubble prior to engagement of the obligate ATPase activator. Our data suggest a general paradigm of transcription initiation that requires σ factors to nucleate an early melted intermediate prior to productive RNA synthesis.

Mechanisms of DNA opening revealed in AAA+ transcription complex structures

Gene transcription is carried out by RNA polymerase (RNAP) and requires the conversion of the initial closed promoter complex, where DNA is double stranded, to a transcription-competent open promoter complex, where DNA is opened up. In bacteria, RNAP relies on σ factors for its promoter specificities. Using a special form of sigma factor (σ54), which forms a stable closed complex and requires its activator that belongs to the AAA+ ATPases (ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities), we obtained cryo-electron microscopy structures of transcription initiation complexes that reveal a previously unidentified process of DNA melting opening. The σ54 amino terminus threads through the locally opened up DNA and then becomes enclosed by the AAA+ hexameric ring in the activator-bound intermediate complex. Our structures suggest how ATP hydrolysis by the AAA+ activator could remove the σ54 inhibition while helping to open up DNA, using σ54 amino-terminal peptide as a pry bar.

Mechanisms of σ54-Dependent Transcription Initiation and Regulation

Cellular RNA polymerase is a multi-subunit macromolecular assembly responsible for gene transcription, a highly regulated process conserved from bacteria to humans. In bacteria, sigma factors are employed to mediate gene-specific expression in response to a variety of environmental conditions. The major variant σ factor, σ54, has a specific role in stress responses. Unlike σ70-dependent transcription, which often can spontaneously proceed to initiation, σ54-dependent transcription requires an additional ATPase protein for activation. As a result, structures of a number of distinct functional states during the dynamic process of transcription initiation have been captured using the σ54 system with both x-ray crystallography and cryo electron microscopy, furthering our understanding of σ54-dependent transcription initiation and DNA opening. Comparisons with σ70 and eukaryotic polymerases reveal unique and common features during transcription initiation.

NtrC-dependent control of exopolysaccharide synthesis and motility in Burkholderia cenocepacia H111

Burkholderia cenocepacia is a versatile opportunistic pathogen that survives in a wide variety of environments, which can be limited in nutrients such as nitrogen. We have previously shown that the sigma factor σ54 is involved in the control of nitrogen assimilation and virulence in B. cenocepacia H111. In this work, we investigated the role of the σ54 enhancer binding protein NtrC in response to nitrogen limitation and in the pathogenicity of H111. Of 95 alternative nitrogen sources tested the ntrC showed defects in the utilisation of nitrate, urea, L-citrulline, acetamide, DL-lactamide, allantoin and parabanic acid. RNA-Seq and phenotypic analyses of an ntrC mutant strain showed that NtrC positively regulates two important phenotypic traits: exopolysaccharide (EPS) production and motility. However, the ntrC mutant was not attenuated in C. elegans virulence.

The bacterial enhancer-dependent RNA polymerase

Transcription initiation is highly regulated in bacterial cells, allowing adaptive gene regulation in response to environment cues. One class of promoter specificity factor called sigma54 enables such adaptive gene expression through its ability to lock the RNA polymerase down into a state unable to melt out promoter DNA for transcription initiation. Promoter DNA opening then occurs through the action of specialized transcription control proteins called bacterial enhancer-binding proteins (bEBPs) that remodel the sigma54 factor within the closed promoter complexes. The remodelling of sigma54 occurs through an ATP-binding and hydrolysis reaction carried out by the bEBPs. The regulation of bEBP self-assembly into typically homomeric hexamers allows regulated gene expression since the self-assembly is required for bEBP ATPase activity and its direct engagement with the sigma54 factor during the remodelling reaction. Crystallographic studies have now established that in the closed promoter complex, the sigma54 factor occupies the bacterial RNA polymerase in ways that will physically impede promoter DNA opening and the loading of melted out promoter DNA into the DNA-binding clefts of the RNA polymerase. Large-scale structural re-organizations of sigma54 require contact of the bEBP with an amino-terminal glutamine and leucine-rich sequence of sigma54, and lead to domain movements within the core RNA polymerase necessary for making open promoter complexes and synthesizing the nascent RNA transcript.

Structures of RNA Polymerase Closed and Intermediate Complexes Reveal Mechanisms of DNA Opening and Transcription Initiation

Gene transcription is carried out by RNA polymerases (RNAPs). For transcription to occur, the closed promoter complex (RPc), where DNA is double stranded, must isomerize into an open promoter complex (RPo), where the DNA is melted out into a transcription bubble and the single-stranded template DNA is delivered to the RNAP active site. Using a bacterial RNAP containing the alternative σ⁵⁴ factor and cryoelectron microscopy, we determined structures of RPc and the activator-bound intermediate complex en route to RPo at 3.8 and 5.8 Å. Our structures show how RNAP-σ⁵⁴ interacts with promoter DNA to initiate the DNA distortions required for transcription bubble formation, and how the activator interacts with RPc, leading to significant conformational changes in RNAP and σ⁵⁴ that promote RPo formation. We propose that DNA melting is an active process initiated in RPc and that the RNAP conformations of intermediates are significantly different from that of RPc and RPo.

•

RNA polymerase closed complex (RPc) structure reveals DNA distortions by σ

•

Intermediate complex (RPi) structure reveals the roles of AAA activator

•

DNA distortion and opening are initiated in RPc and RPi before entering the RNAP

•

RNAP conformation in RPi is significantly different from closed or open complex

Novel DNA Binding and Regulatory Activities for σ54 (RpoN) in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium 14028s

The variable sigma (σ) subunit of the bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme, which is responsible for promoter specificity and open complex formation, plays a strategic role in the response to environmental changes. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium utilizes the housekeeping σ⁷⁰ and five alternative sigma factors, including σ⁵⁴ The σ⁵⁴-RNAP differs from other σ-RNAP holoenzymes in that it forms a stable closed complex with the promoter and requires ATP hydrolysis by an activated cognate bacterial enhancer binding protein (bEBP) to transition to an open complex and initiate transcription. In S. Typhimurium, σ⁵⁴-dependent promoters normally respond to one of 13 different bEBPs, each of which is activated under a specific growth condition. Here, we utilized a constitutively active, promiscuous bEBP to perform a genome-wide identification of σ⁵⁴-RNAP DNA binding sites and the transcriptome of the σ⁵⁴ regulon of S. Typhimurium. The position and context of many of the identified σ⁵⁴ RNAP DNA binding sites suggest regulatory roles for σ⁵⁴-RNAP that connect the σ⁵⁴ regulon to regulons of other σ factors to provide a dynamic response to rapidly changing environmental conditions.IMPORTANCE The alternative sigma factor σ⁵⁴ (RpoN) is required for expression of genes involved in processes with significance in agriculture, bioenergy production, bioremediation, and host-microbe interactions. The characterization of the σ⁵⁴ regulon of the versatile pathogen S. Typhimurium has expanded our understanding of the scope of the σ⁵⁴ regulon and how it links to other σ regulons within the complex regulatory network for gene expression in bacteria.

Crystal structure of Aquifex aeolicus σN bound to promoter DNA and the structure of σN-holoenzyme

The bacterial σ factors confer promoter specificity to the RNA polymerase (RNAP). One alternative σ factor, σ^N, is unique in its structure and functional mechanism, forming transcriptionally inactive promoter complexes that require activation by specialized AAA⁺ ATPases. We report a 3.4-Å resolution X-ray crystal structure of a σ^N fragment in complex with its cognate promoter DNA, revealing the molecular details of promoter recognition by σ^N The structure allowed us to build and refine an improved σ^N-holoenzyme model based on previously published 3.8-Å resolution X-ray data. The improved σ^N-holoenzyme model reveals a conserved interdomain interface within σ^N that, when disrupted by mutations, leads to transcription activity without activator intervention (so-called bypass mutants). Thus, the structure and stability of this interdomain interface are crucial for the role of σ^N in blocking transcription activity and in maintaining the activator sensitivity of σ^N.

Modulating Salmonella Typhimurium's Response to a Changing Environment through Bacterial Enhancer-Binding Proteins and the RpoN Regulon

Transcription sigma factors direct the selective binding of RNA polymerase holoenzyme (Eσ) to specific promoters. Two families of sigma factors determine promoter specificity, the σ(70) (RpoD) family and the σ(54) (RpoN) family. In transcription controlled by σ(54), the Eσ(54)-promoter closed complex requires ATP hydrolysis by an associated bacterial enhancer-binding protein (bEBP) for the transition to open complex and transcription initiation. Given the wide host range of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, it is an excellent model system for investigating the roles of RpoN and its bEBPs in modulating the lifestyle of bacteria. The genome of S. Typhimurium encodes 13 known or predicted bEBPs, each responding to a unique intracellular or extracellular signal. While the regulons of most alternative sigma factors respond to a specific environmental or developmental signal, the RpoN regulon is very diverse, controlling genes for response to nitrogen limitation, nitric oxide stress, availability of alternative carbon sources, phage shock/envelope stress, toxic levels of zinc, nucleic acid damage, and other stressors. This review explores how bEBPs respond to environmental changes encountered by S. Typhimurium during transmission/infection and influence adaptation through control of transcription of different components of the S. Typhimurium RpoN regulon.

TRANSCRIPTION. Structures of the RNA polymerase-σ54 reveal new and conserved regulatory strategies

Transcription by RNA polymerase (RNAP) in bacteria requires specific promoter recognition by σ factors. The major variant σ factor (σ(54)) initially forms a transcriptionally silent complex requiring specialized adenosine triphosphate-dependent activators for initiation. Our crystal structure of the 450-kilodalton RNAP-σ(54) holoenzyme at 3.8 angstroms reveals molecular details of σ(54) and its interactions with RNAP. The structure explains how σ(54) targets different regions in RNAP to exert its inhibitory function. Although σ(54) and the major σ factor, σ(70), have similar functional domains and contact similar regions of RNAP, unanticipated differences are observed in their domain arrangement and interactions with RNAP, explaining their distinct properties. Furthermore, we observe evolutionarily conserved regulatory hotspots in RNAPs that can be targeted by a diverse range of mechanisms to fine tune transcription.

Domain movements of the enhancer-dependent sigma factor drive DNA delivery into the RNA polymerase active site: insights from single molecule studies

Recognition of bacterial promoters is regulated by two distinct classes of sequence-specific sigma factors, σ⁷⁰ or σ⁵⁴, that differ both in their primary sequence and in the requirement of the latter for activation via enhancer-bound upstream activators. The σ⁵⁴ version controls gene expression in response to stress, often mediating pathogenicity. Its activator proteins are members of the AAA+ superfamily and use adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis to remodel initially auto-inhibited holoenzyme promoter complexes. We have mapped this remodeling using single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy. Initial remodeling is nucleotide-independent and driven by binding both ssDNA during promoter melting and activator. However, DNA loading into the RNA polymerase active site depends on co-operative ATP hydrolysis by the activator. Although the coupled promoter recognition and melting steps may be conserved between σ⁷⁰ and σ⁵⁴, the domain movements of the latter have evolved to require an activator ATPase.

A common feature from different subunits of a homomeric AAA+ protein contacts three spatially distinct transcription elements

Initiation of σ(54)-dependent transcription requires assistance to melt DNA at the promoter site but is impeded by numerous protein-protein and nucleo-protein interactions. To alleviate these inhibitory interactions, hexameric bacterial enhancer binding proteins (bEBP), a subset of the ATPases associated with various cellular activities (AAA+) protein family, are required to remodel the transcription complex using energy derived from ATP hydrolysis. However, neither the process of energy conversion nor the internal architecture of the closed promoter complex is well understood. Escherichia coli Phage shock protein F (PspF), a well-studied bEBP, contains a surface-exposed loop 1 (L1). L1 is key to the energy coupling process by interacting with Region I of σ(54) (σ(54)(RI)) in a nucleotide dependent manner. Our analyses uncover new levels of complexity in the engagement of a multimeric bEBP with a basal transcription complex via several L1s. The mechanistic implications for these multivalent L1 interactions are elaborated in the light of available structures for the bEBP and its target complexes.

Mechanism of transcription initiation at an activator-dependent promoter defined by single-molecule observation

Understanding the pathway and kinetic mechanisms of transcription initiation is essential for quantitative understanding of gene regulation, but initiation is a multistep process, the features of which can be obscured in bulk analysis. We used a multiwavelength single-molecule fluorescence colocalization approach, CoSMoS, to define the initiation pathway at an activator-dependent bacterial σ(54) promoter that recapitulates characteristic features of eukaryotic promoters activated by enhancer binding proteins. The experiments kinetically characterize all major steps of the initiation process, revealing heretofore unknown features, including reversible formation of two closed complexes with greatly differing stabilities, multiple attempts for each successful formation of an open complex, and efficient release of σ(54) from the polymerase core at the start of transcript synthesis. Open complexes are committed to transcription, suggesting that regulation likely targets earlier steps in the mechanism. CoSMoS is a powerful, generally applicable method to elucidate the mechanisms of transcription and other multistep biochemical processes.

The role of the conserved phenylalanine in the sigma54-interacting GAFTGA motif of bacterial enhancer binding proteins

σ⁵⁴-dependent transcription requires activation by bacterial enhancer binding proteins (bEBPs). bEBPs are members of the AAA+ (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) protein family and typically form hexameric structures that are crucial for their ATPase activity. The precise mechanism by which the energy derived from ATP hydrolysis is coupled to biological output has several unknowns. Here we use Escherichia coli PspF, a model bEBP involved in the transcription of stress response genes (psp operon), to study determinants of its contact features with the closed promoter complex. We demonstrate that substitution of a highly conserved phenylalanine (F85) residue within the L1 loop GAFTGA motif affects (i) the ATP hydrolysis rate of PspF, demonstrating the link between L1 and the nucleotide binding pocket; (ii) the internal organization of the hexameric ring; and (iii) σ⁵⁴ interactions. Importantly, we provide evidence for a close relationship between F85 and the −12 DNA fork junction structure, which may contribute to key interactions during the energy coupling step and the subsequent remodelling of the Eσ⁵⁴ closed complex. The functionality of F85 is distinct from that of other GAFTGA residues, especially T86 where in contrast to F85 a clean uncoupling phenotype is observed.

Comparative analysis of activator-Esigma54 complexes formed with nucleotide-metal fluoride analogues

Bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) containing the major variant σ⁵⁴ factor forms open promoter complexes in a reaction in which specialized activator proteins hydrolyse ATP. Here we probe binding interactions between σ⁵⁴-RNAP (Eσ⁵⁴) and the ATPases associated with various cellular activities (AAA+) domain of the Escherichia coli activator protein, PspF, using nucleotide-metal fluoride (BeF and AlF) analogues representing ground and transition states of ATP, which allow complexes (that are otherwise too transient with ATP) to be captured. We show that the organization and functionality of the ADP–BeF- and ADP–AlF-dependent complexes greatly overlap. Our data support an activation pathway in which the initial ATP-dependent binding of the activator to the Eσ⁵⁴ closed complex results in the re-organization of Eσ⁵⁴ with respect to the transcription start-site. However, the nucleotide-dependent binding interactions between the activator and the Eσ⁵⁴ closed complex are in themselves insufficient for forming open promoter complexes when linear double-stranded DNA is present in the initial closed complex.

Organization of an activator-bound RNA polymerase holoenzyme

Transcription initiation involves the conversion from closed promoter complexes, comprising RNA polymerase (RNAP) and double-stranded promoter DNA, to open complexes, in which the enzyme is able to access the DNA template in a single-stranded form. The complex between bacterial RNAP and its major variant sigma factor σ⁵⁴ remains as a closed complex until ATP hydrolysis-dependent remodeling by activator proteins occurs. This remodeling facilitates DNA melting and allows the transition to the open complex. Here we present cryoelectron microscopy reconstructions of bacterial RNAP in complex with σ⁵⁴ alone, and of RNAP-σ⁵⁴ with an AAA+ activator. Together with photo-crosslinking data that establish the location of promoter DNA within the complexes, we explain why the RNAP-σ⁵⁴ closed complex is unable to access the DNA template and propose how the structural changes induced by activator binding can initiate conformational changes that ultimately result in formation of the open complex.

Modus operandi of the bacterial RNA polymerase containing the sigma54 promoter-specificity factor

Bacterial sigma (sigma) factors confer gene specificity upon the RNA polymerase, the central enzyme that catalyses gene transcription. The binding of the alternative sigma factor sigma(54) confers upon the RNA polymerase special functional and regulatory properties, making it suited for control of several major adaptive responses. Here, we summarize our current understanding of the interactions the sigma(54) factor makes with the bacterial transcription machinery.

Protein-DNA interactions that govern AAA+ activator-dependent bacterial transcription initiation

Transcriptional control at the promoter melting step is not yet well understood. In this study, a site-directed photo-cross-linking method was used to systematically analyse component protein-DNA interactions that govern promoter melting by the enhancer-dependent Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) containing the sigma(54) promoter specificity factor (E sigma(54)) at a single base pair resolution in three functional states. The sigma(54)-factor imposes tight control upon the RNAP by creating a regulatory switch where promoter melting nucleates, approximately 12 bp upstream of the transcription start site. Promoter melting by E sigma(54) is only triggered upon remodelling of this regulatory switch by a specialised activator protein in an ATP-hydrolysing reaction. We demonstrate that prior to DNA melting, only the sigma(54)-factor directly interacts with the promoter in the regulatory switch within the initial closed E sigma(54)-promoter complex and one intermediate E sigma(54)-promoter complex. We establish that activator-induced conformational rearrangements in the regulatory switch are a prerequisite to allow the promoter to enter the catalytic cleft of the RNAP and hence establish the transcriptionally competent open complex, where full promoter melting occurs. These results significantly advance our current understanding of the structural transitions occurring at bacterial promoters, where regulation occurs at the DNA melting step.

Chromatin structure can strongly facilitate enhancer action over a distance

Numerous DNA transactions in eukaryotic nuclei are regulated by elements (enhancers) that can directly interact with their targets over large regions of DNA organized into chromatin. The mechanisms allowing communication over a distance in chromatin are unknown. We have established an experimental system allowing quantitative analysis of the impact of chromatin structure on distant transcriptional regulation. Assembly of relaxed or linear DNA templates into subsaturated chromatin results in a strong increase of the efficiency of distant enhancer-promoter E-P communication and activation of transcription. The effect is directly proportional to the efficiency of chromatin assembly and cannot be explained only by DNA compaction. Transcription activation on chromatin templates is enhancer- and activator-dependent, and must be accompanied by direct E-P interaction and formation of a chromatin loop. Previously we have shown that DNA supercoiling can strongly facilitate E-P communication on histone-free DNA. The effects of chromatin assembly and DNA supercoiling on the communication are quantitatively similar, but the efficiency of enhancer action in subsaturated chromatin does not depend on the level of unconstrained DNA supercoiling. Thus chromatin structure per se can support highly efficient communication over a distance and functionally mimic the supercoiled state characteristic for prokaryotic DNA.

Mapping ATP-dependent activation at a sigma54 promoter

The sigma(54) promoter specificity factor is distinct from other bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) sigma factors in that it forms a transcriptionally silent closed complex upon promoter binding. Transcriptional activation occurs through a nucleotide-dependent isomerization of sigma(54), mediated via its interactions with an enhancer-binding activator protein that utilizes the energy released in ATP hydrolysis to effect structural changes in sigma(54) and core RNA polymerase. The organization of sigma(54)-promoter and sigma(54)-RNAP-promoter complexes was investigated by fluorescence resonance energy transfer assays using sigma(54) single cysteine-mutants labeled with an acceptor fluorophore and donor fluorophore-labeled DNA sequences containing mismatches that mimic nifH early- and late-melted promoters. The results show that sigma(54) undergoes spatial rearrangements of functionally important domains upon closed complex formation. sigma(54) and sigma(54)-RNAP promoter complexes reconstituted with the different mismatched DNA constructs were assayed by the addition of the activator phage shock protein F in the presence or absence of ATP and of non-hydrolysable analogues. Nucleotide-dependent alterations in fluorescence resonance energy transfer efficiencies identify different functional states of the activator-sigma(54)-RNAP-promoter complex that exist throughout the mechano-chemical transduction pathway of transcriptional activation, i.e. from closed to open promoter complexes. The results suggest that open complex formation only occurs efficiently on replacement of a repressive fork junction with down-stream melted DNA.

Protein-induced DNA bending clarifies the architectural organization of the sigma54-dependent glnAp2 promoter

Sigma54-RNA polymerase (Esigma54) predominantly contacts one face of the DNA helix in the closed promoter complex, and interacts with the upstream enhancer-bound activator via DNA looping. Up to date, the precise face of Esigma54 that contacts the activator to convert the closed complex to an open one remains unclear. By introducing protein-induced DNA bends at precise locations between upstream enhancer sequences and the core promoter of the sigma54-dependent glnAp2 promoter without changing the distance in-between, we observed a strong enhanced or decreased promoter activity, especially on linear DNA templates in vitro. The relative positioning and orientations of Esigma54, DNA bending protein and enhancer-bound activator on linear DNA were determined by in vitro footprinting analysis. Intriguingly, the locations from which the DNA bending protein exerted its optimal stimulatory effects were all found on the opposite face of the DNA helix compared with the DNA bound Esigma54 in the closed complex. Therefore, these results provide evidence that the activator must approach the Esigma54 closed complexes from the unbound face of the promoter DNA helix to catalyse open complex formation. This proposal is further supported by the modelling of activator-promoter DNA-Esigma54 complex.

Identification of a positive transcription regulatory element within the coding region of the nifLA operon in Azotobacter vinelandii

Nitrogen fixation in Azotobacter vinelandii is regulated by the nifLA operon. NifA activates the transcription of nif genes, while NifL antagonizes the transcriptional activator NifA in response to fixed nitrogen and molecular oxygen levels. However, transcriptional regulation of the nifLA operon of A. vinelandii itself is not fully understood. Using the S1 nuclease assay, we mapped the transcription start site of the nifLA operon, showing it to be similar to the sigma54-dependent promoters. We also identified a positive cis-acting regulatory element (+134 to +790) of the nifLA operon within the coding region of the nifL gene of A. vinelandii. Deletion of this element results in complete loss of promoter activity. Several protein factors bind to this region, and the specific binding sites have been mapped by DNase I foot printing. Two of these sites, namely dR1 (+134 to +204) and dR2 (+745 to +765), are involved in regulating the nifLA promoter activity. The absence of NtrC-like binding sites in the upstream region of the nifLA operon in A. vinelandii makes the identification of these downstream elements a highly significant finding. The interaction of the promoter with the proteins binding to the dR2 region spanning +745 to +765 appears to be dependent on the face of the helix as introduction of 4 bases just before this region completely disrupts promoter activity. Thus, the positive regulatory element present within the BglII-BglII fragment may play, in part; an important role in nifLA regulation in A. vinelandii.

Stable DNA opening within open promoter complexes is mediated by the RNA polymerase beta'-jaw domain

DNA opening for transcription-competent open promoter complex (OC) formation by the bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) relies upon a complex network of interactions between the structurally conserved and flexible modules of the catalytic beta and beta'-subunits, RNAP-associated sigma-subunit, and the DNA. Here, we show that one such module, the beta'-jaw, functions to stabilize the OC. In OCs formed by the major sigma70-RNAP, the stabilizing role of the beta'-jaw is not restricted to any particular melted DNA segment. In contrast, in OCs formed by the major variant sigma54-RNAP, the beta'-jaw and a conserved sigma54 regulatory domain co-operate to stabilize the melted DNA segment immediately upstream of the transcription start site. Clearly, regulated communication between the mobile modules of the RNAP and the functional domain(s) of the sigma subunit is required for stable DNA opening.

Molecular determinants for PspA-mediated repression of the AAA transcriptional activator PspF

The Escherichia coli phage shock protein system (pspABCDE operon and pspG gene) is induced by numerous stresses related to the membrane integrity state. Transcription of the psp genes requires the RNA polymerase containing the sigma(54) subunit and the AAA transcriptional activator PspF. PspF belongs to an atypical class of sigma(54) AAA activators in that it lacks an N-terminal regulatory domain and is instead negatively regulated by another regulatory protein, PspA. PspA therefore represses its own expression. The PspA protein is distributed between the cytoplasm and the inner membrane fraction. In addition to its transcriptional inhibitory role, PspA assists maintenance of the proton motive force and protein export. Several lines of in vitro evidence indicate that PspA-PspF interactions inhibit the ATPase activity of PspF, resulting in the inhibition of PspF-dependent gene expression. In this study, we characterize sequences within PspA and PspF crucial for the negative effect of PspA upon PspF. Using a protein fragmentation approach, we show that the integrity of the three putative N-terminal alpha-helical domains of PspA is crucial for the role of PspA as a negative regulator of PspF. A bacterial two-hybrid system allowed us to provide clear evidence for an interaction in E. coli between PspA and PspF in vivo, which strongly suggests that PspA-directed inhibition of PspF occurs via an inhibitory complex. Finally, we identify a single PspF residue that is a binding determinant for PspA.

Communication between Esigma(54) , promoter DNA and the conserved threonine residue in the GAFTGA motif of the PspF sigma-dependent activator during transcription activation

Conversion of Esigma(54) closed promoter complexes to open promoter complexes requires specialized activators which are members of the AAA (ATPases Associated with various cellular Activities) protein family. The ATP binding and hydrolysis activity of Esigma(54) activators is used in an energy coupling reaction to remodel the Esigma(54) closed promoter complex and to overcome the sigma(54)-imposed block on open complex formation. The remodelling target for the AAA activator within the Esigma(54) closed complex includes a complex interface contributed to by Region I of sigma(54), core RNA polymerase and a promoter DNA fork junction structure, comprising the Esigma(54) regulatory centre. One sigma(54) binding surface on Esigma(54) activators is a conserved sequence known as the GAFTGA motif. Here, we present a detailed characterization of the interaction between Region I of sigma(54) and the Escherichia coli AAA sigma(54) activator Phage shock protein F. Using Esigma(54) promoter complexes that mimic different conformations adopted by the DNA during open complex formation, we investigated the contribution of the conserved threonine residue in the GAFTGA motif to transcription activation. Our results suggest that the organization of the Esigma(54) regulatory centre, and in particular the conformation adopted by the sigma(54) Region I and the DNA fork junction structure during open complex formation, is communicated to the AAA activator via the conserved T residue of the GAFTGA motif.

Investigating protein-protein interfaces in bacterial transcription complexes: a fragmentation approach

Transcription initiation by sigma(54)-RNA polymerase (RNAP) relies explicitly on a transient interaction with a complex molecular machine belonging to the AAA+ (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) superfamily. Members of the AAA+ superfamily convert chemical energy derived from NTP hydrolysis to a mechanical force used to remodel their target substrate. Recently Bordes and colleagues,1 using a protein fragmentation approach, identified a unique sequence within sigma(54)-dependent transcriptional activators that constitutes a sigma(54)-binding interface. This interface is not static, but subject to nucleotide-dependent movement which may represent a common mechanism for controlling output that has been adopted by other AAA+ proteins.

Mapping sigma 54-RNA polymerase interactions at the -24 consensus promoter element

The sigma 54 promoter specificity factor is distinct from sigma 70-type factors. The sigma 54-RNA polymerase binds to promoters with conserved sequence elements at -24 and -12 and utilizes specialized enhancer-binding activators to convert, through an ATP-dependent process, closed promoter complexes to open promoter complexes. The interface between sigma 54-RNA polymerase and promoter DNA is poorly characterized, contrasting with sigma 70. Here, sigma 54 was modified with strategically positioned cleavage reagents to provide physical evidence that the highly conserved RpoN box motif of sigma 54 is close to and may therefore interact with the consensus -24 promoter element. We show that the spatial relationship between the sigma 54-RNA polymerase and the -24 promoter element remains unchanged during closed to open complex conversion and transcription initiation but changes during the early elongation phase. In contrast, the spatial relationship between sigma 54-RNA polymerase and the consensus -12 promoter element changes upon conversion of the closed promoter complex to an open one. We provide evidence that some -12 promoter region-sigma 54 interactions are dependent upon either the core RNA polymerase or a fork junction DNA structure at the -12-position, indicating that DNA fork junctions can substitute for core RNAP. We also show the beta-subunit flap domain contributes to different sets of sigma-promoter DNA interactions at sigma 54- and sigma 70-dependent promoters.

Nucleotide-dependent triggering of RNA polymerase-DNA interactions by an AAA regulator of transcription

Enhancer-dependent activator proteins, which act upon the bacterial RNA polymerase containing the sigma54 promoter specificity factor, belong to the AAA superfamily of ATPases. Activator-sigma54 contact is required for the sigma54-RNAP to isomerize and engage the DNA template for transcription. How ATP hydrolysis is used to trigger changes in sigma54-RNA polymerase and promoter DNA that lead to DNA opening is poorly understood. Here, band shift and footprinting assays were used to investigate the DNA binding activities of sigma54 and sigma54-RNA polymerase in the presence of the activator protein PspF bound to poorly hydrolysable analogues of ATP and the ATP hydrolysis transition-state analogue ADP.AlFx. Results show that different nucleotide-bound forms of PspF can change the interactions between sigma54, sigma54-RNA polymerase, and a DNA fork junction structure present within closed promoter complexes. This provides evidence that in the activation transduction pathway, several functional states of the activator, prior to ATP hydrolysis, can serve to alter the fork junction binding activity of sigma54 and sigma54-RNA polymerase that precede full DNA opening. A sequential set of nucleotide-dependent transitions in sigma54-RNA polymerase promoter complexes needed for productive open complex formation may therefore depend upon different nucleotide-bound forms of the activator.

The ATP hydrolyzing transcription activator phage shock protein F of Escherichia coli: identifying a surface that binds sigma 54

Members of the protein family called ATPases associated with various cellular activities (AAA(+)) play a crucial role in transforming chemical energy into biological events. AAA(+) proteins are complex molecular machines and typically form ring-shaped oligomeric complexes that are crucial for ATPase activity and mechanism of action. The Escherichia coli transcription activator phage shock protein F (PspF) is an AAA(+) mechanochemical enzyme that functions to sense and relay the energy derived from nucleoside triphosphate hydrolysis to catalyze transcription by the sigma(54)-RNA polymerase. Closed promoter complexes formed by the sigma(54)-RNA polymerase are substrates for the action of PspF. By using a protein fragmentation approach, we identify here at least one sigma(54)-binding surface in the PspF AAA(+) domain. Results suggest that ATP hydrolysis by PspF is coupled to the exposure of at least one sigma(54)-binding surface. This nucleotide hydrolysis-dependent presentation of a substrate binding surface can explain why complexes that form between sigma(54) and PspF are transient and could be part of a mechanism used generally by other AAA(+) proteins to regulate activity.

Multiple roles of the RNA polymerase beta subunit flap domain in sigma 54-dependent transcription

Recent determinations of the structures of the bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) and promoter complex thereof establish that RNAP functions as a complex molecular machine that contains distinct structural modules that undergo major conformational changes during transcription. However, the contribution of the RNAP structural modules to transcription remains poorly understood. The bacterial core RNAP (alpha(2)beta beta'omega; E) associates with a sigma (sigma) subunit to form the holoenzyme (E sigma). A mutation removing the beta subunit flap domain renders the Escherichia coli sigma(70) RNAP holoenzyme unable to recognize promoters. sigma(54) is the major variant sigma subunit that utilizes enhancer-dependent promoters. Here, we determined the effects of beta flap removal on sigma(54)-dependent transcription. Our analysis shows that the role of the beta flap in sigma(54)-dependent and sigma(70)-dependent transcription is different. Removal of the beta flap does not prevent the recognition of sigma(54)-dependent promoters, but causes multiple defects in sigma(54)-dependent transcription. Most importantly, the beta flap appears to orchestrate the proper formation of the E sigma(54) regulatory center at the start site proximal promoter element where activator binds and DNA melting originates.

Mechanism of action of the Escherichia coli phage shock protein PspA in repression of the AAA family transcription factor PspF

The PspA protein, a negative regulator of the Escherichia coli phage shock psp operon, is produced when virulence factors are exported through secretins in many Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria and its homologue in plants, VIPP1, plays a critical role in thylakoid biogenesis, essential for photosynthesis. Activation of transcription by the enhancer-dependent bacterial sigma(54) containing RNA polymerase occurs through ATP hydrolysis-driven protein conformational changes enabled by activator proteins that belong to the large AAA(+) mechanochemical protein family. We show that PspA directly and specifically acts upon and binds to the AAA(+) domain of the PspF transcription activator. Interactions involving PspF and nucleotide are changed by the action of PspA. These changes and the complexes that form between PspF and PspA can explain how PspA exerts its negative effects upon transcription activated by PspF, and are of significance when considering how activities of other AAA(+) proteins might be controlled.

Beta subunit residues 186-433 and 436-445 are commonly used by Esigma54 and Esigma70 RNA polymerase for open promoter complex formation

During transcription initiation by DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNAP) promoter DNA has to be melted locally to allow the synthesis of RNA transcript. Localized melting of promoter DNA is a target for genetic regulation and is poorly understood at the molecular level. The Escherichia coli RNAP holoenzyme is a six-subunit (alpha(2)betabeta'omegasigma; Esigma) protein complex. The sigma subunit is directly responsible for promoter recognition and contributes to localized DNA melting. Mutations in the beta subunit have profound effects on promoter melting by Esigma70. The sigma54 subunit is a representative of an unrelated class of the sigma subunits. Here, we determined whether mutations in the beta subunit that affect late stages of promoter complex formation by Esigma70 also influence promoter complex formation by the enhancer-dependent Esigma54. Analyses of in vitro defects in promoter complex formation and transcription initiation exhibited by mutant Esigma54 suggest that during promoter complex formation by Esigma54 and Esigma70 a common set of beta subunit sequences is used. Late stages of promoter complex formation and localized melting of promoter DNA by Esigma70 and Esigma54 thus proceed through a common pathway.

Roles for the C-terminal region of sigma 54 in transcriptional silencing and DNA binding

Twenty-one conserved positively charged and aromatic amino acids between residues 331 and 462 of sigma 54 were changed to alanine, and the mutant proteins were studied by transcription, band shift analysis, and footprinting in vitro. A small segment corresponding to the rpoN box was found to be most important for binding duplex DNA. Two amino acids, 52 residues apart, were found to be critical for maintaining transcriptional silencing in the absence of activator. These two activator bypass mutants and several other mutants failed to bind the type of fork junction DNA thought to be required to maintain silencing. The two bypass mutants showed a binding pattern to DNA probes that was unique, both in comparison to other C-terminal mutants and to previously known N-terminal bypass mutants. On this basis, a model is proposed for the role of the C terminus and the N terminus of sigma 54 in enhancer-dependent transcription.

Regulatory sequences in sigma 54 localise near the start of DNA melting

Transcription initiation by the enhancer-dependent sigma(54) RNA polymerase holoenzyme is positively regulated after promoter binding. The promoter DNA melting process is subject to activation by an enhancer-bound activator protein with nucleoside triphosphate hydrolysis activity. Tethered iron chelate probes attached to amino and carboxyl-terminal domains of sigma(54) were used to map sigma(54)-DNA interaction sites. The two domains localise to form a centre over the -12 promoter region. The use of deletion mutants of sigma(54) suggests that amino-terminal and carboxyl-terminal sequences are both needed for the centre to function. Upon activation, the relationship between the centre and promoter DNA changes. We suggest that the activator re-organises the centre to favour stable open complex formation through adjustments in sigma(54)-DNA contact and sigma(54) conformation. The centre is close to the active site of the RNA polymerase and includes sigma(54) regulatory sequences needed for DNA melting upon activation. This contrasts systems where activators recruit RNA polymerase to promoter DNA, and the protein and DNA determinants required for activation localise away from promoter sequences closely associated with the start of DNA melting.

DNA melting within a binary sigma(54)-promoter DNA complex

The final sigma(54) subunit of the bacterial RNA polymerase requires the action of specialized enhancer-binding activators to initiate transcription. Here we show that final sigma(54) is able to melt promoter DNA when it is bound to a DNA structure representing the initial nucleation of DNA opening found in closed complexes. Melting occurs in response to activator in a nucleotide-hydrolyzing reaction and appears to spread downstream from the nucleation point toward the transcription start site. We show that final sigma(54) contains some weak determinants for DNA melting that are masked by the Region I sequences and some strong ones that require Region I. It seems that final sigma(54) binds to DNA in a self-inhibited state, and one function of the activator is therefore to promote a conformational change in final sigma(54) to reveal its DNA-melting activity. Results with the holoenzyme bound to early melted DNA suggest an ordered series of events in which changes in core to final sigma(54) interactions and final sigma(54)-DNA interactions occur in response to activator to allow final sigma(54) isomerization and the holoenzyme to progress from the closed complex to the open complex.

Sequences within the DNA cross-linking patch of sigma 54 involved in promoter recognition, sigma isomerization, and open complex formation

The bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing the final sigma(54) subunit functions in enhancer-dependent transcription. Mutagenesis has been used to probe the function of a sequence in the final sigma(54) DNA binding domain that includes residues that cross-link to promoter DNA. Several activities of the final sigma and holoenzyme are shown to depend on the cross-linking patch. The patch contributes to promoter binding by final sigma(54), and holoenzyme and is involved in activator-dependent final sigma isomerization. As part of the final sigma(54)-holoenzyme, some residues in the patch limit basal transcription. Other cross-linking patch sequences appear to limit activator-dependent open complex formation. Deletion of 19 residues adjacent to the cross-linking patch resulted in a holoenzyme unable to respond to activator but capable of activator-independent (bypass) transcription in vitro. Overall results are consistent with the cross-linking patch directing interactions to the -12 promoter region to set basal and activated levels of transcription.

In vivo structure of the cell cycle-regulated human cdc25C promoter

The cdc25C promoter is regulated during the cell cycle by the transcriptional repressor CDF-1 that inhibits the activation function of upstream transcriptional activators, most notably the nuclear factor Y/CAAT box binding factor (NF-Y/CBF). In this report a detailed analysis of the in vivo structure of the cdc25C promoter was made. Micrococcus nuclease and methidiumpropyl-EDTA footprinting strongly suggest that the proximal promoter encompassing the cell cycle-dependent element/cell cycle genes homology region and the upstream NF-Y sites is organized in a positioned nucleosome throughout the cell cycle. Furthermore, structural perturbations were detected by DNase I, phenanthroline copper, and KMnO(4) footprinting at the NF-Y binding sites in vivo, which is in agreement with the reported property of NF-Y to bend DNA in vitro. Similar results were obtained with the structurally and functionally related cyclin A promoter. The structural perturbations seen in DNase I and phenanthroline copper footprints were less pronounced in G(0) cells when compared with cycling cells. This presumably reflects a weakened in vivo interaction of NF-Y with its cognate DNA element in G(0). It is likely that these structural perturbations, together with the reported ability of NF-Y to recruit histone acetyl transferase activity, contribute to an opened chromatin structure as a prerequisite for optimal regulation through activation and repression.

Compilation and analysis of sigma(54)-dependent promoter sequences

Promoters recognized by the RNA-polymerase with the alternative sigma factor sigma(54) (Esigma54) are unique in having conserved positions around -24 and -12 nucleotides upstream from the transcriptional start site, instead of the typical -35 and -10 boxes. Here we compile 186 -24/-12 promoter sequences reported in the literature and generate an updated and extended consensus sequence. The use of the extended consensus increases the probability of identifying genuine -24/-12 promoters. The effect of several reported mutations at the -24/-12 elements on RNA-polymerase binding and promoter strength is discussed in the light of the updated consensus.

The hydrophobic heptad repeat in Region III of Escherichia coli transcription factor sigma 54 is essential for core RNA polymerase binding

Escherichia coli transcription factor sigma 54 contains motifs that resemble closely those used for RNA polymerase II in mammalian cells, including two hydrophobic heptad repeats, a very acidic region and a glutamine-rich region. Triple changes in hydrophobic or multiple changes in acidic residues in Region III are known to severely impair core-binding ability. To investigate whether all the changes in triple mutants are necessary for core binding, site-directed mutagenesis was performed to create single and double mutants in the leucine or isoleucine residues in the heptad repeat in Region III. Single mutants showed no discernible loss of function. Double mutants showed partial protection of the -12 promoter element of the glnAp2 promoter due to the partial loss of their ability to bind core RNA polymerase. These mutations were deleterious to the function of sigma 54, which retained only 30-40% of wild-type mRNA levels. However, double mutants retained nearly normal ability to form open complexes. Two triple mutants created during previous work lost most, if not all, of their ability to bind core RNA polymerase, to protect the -12 promoter element of the glnAp2 promoter and to open the transcription start site. The two triple mutants produced about 20% or less than 10% of the wild-type transcripts from the glnAp2 promoter. These results demonstrate that the hydrophobic heptad repeat in Region III is essential for core RNA polymerase binding. Progressive loss of hydrophobicity of the hydrophobic heptad repeat in Region III of sigma 54 resulted in a progressive loss of core-binding ability, leading to the loss of -12 promoter element recognition and mRNA production.

Functions of the sigma(54) region I in trans and implications for transcription activation

Control of transcription frequently involves the direct interaction of activators with RNA polymerase. In bacteria, the formation of stable open promoter complexes by the sigma(54) RNA polymerase is critically dependent on sigma(54) amino Region I sequences. Their presence correlates with activator dependence, and removal allows the holoenzyme to engage productively with melted DNA independently of the activator. Using purified Region I sequences and holoenzymes containing full-length or Region I-deleted sigma(54), we have explored the involvement of Region I in transcription activation. Results show that Region I in trans inhibits a reversible conformational change in the holoenzyme believed to be polymerase isomerization. Evidence is presented indicating that the holoenzyme (and not the promoter DNA per se) is one interacting target used by Region I in preventing polymerase isomerization. Activator overcomes this inhibition in a reaction requiring nucleotide hydrolysis. Region I in trans is able to inhibit activated transcription by the holoenzyme containing full-length sigma(54). Inhibition appeared to be noncompetitive with respect to the activator, suggesting that a direct activator interaction occurs with parts of the holoenzyme outside Region I. Stabilization of isomerized holoenzyme bound to melted DNA by Region I in trans occurs largely independently of the initiating nucleotide, suggesting a role for Region I in maintaining the open complex.

The sigma 54 DNA-binding domain includes a determinant of enhancer responsiveness

The bacterial sigma54 protein associates with core RNA polymerase to form a holoenzyme that functions in enhancer-dependent transcription. Isomerization of the sigma54 polymerase and its engagement with melted DNA in open promoter complexes requires nucleotide hydrolysis by an enhancer-binding activator. We show that a single amino acid substitution, RA336, in the Klebsiella pneumoniae sigma54 C-terminal DNA-binding domain allows the holoenzyme to isomerize, engage with stably melted DNA and to transcribe from transiently melting DNA without an activator. Activator responsiveness for the formation of stable open complexes remained intact. The activator-independent transcription phenotype of RA336 is shared with mutants in amino-terminal Region I sequences. Thus, in sigma54, two distinct domains function for enhancer responsiveness. A sigma54-DNA contact mediated by R336 appears to be part of a network of interactions necessary for maintaining the transcriptionally inactive state of the holoenzyme. We suggest activator functions to change these interactions and facilitate open complex formation through promoting polymerase isomerization.

Involvement of the sigmaN DNA-binding domain in open complex formation

sigmaN (sigma54) RNA polymerase holoenzyme closed complexes isomerize to open complexes in a reaction requiring nucleoside triphosphate hydrolysis by enhancer binding activator proteins. Here, we characterize Klebsiella pneumoniae sigmaN mutants, altered in the carboxy DNA-binding domain (F354A/F355A, F402A, F403A and F402A/F403A), that fail in activator-dependent transcription. The mutant holoenzymes have altered activator-dependent interactions with promoter sequences that normally become melted. Activator-dependent stable complexes accumulated slowly in vitro (F402A) and to a reduced final level (F403A, F402A/F403A, F354A/F355A). Similar results were obtained in an assay of activator-independent stable complex formation. Premelted templates did not rescue the mutants for stable preinitiation complex formation but did for deleted region I sigmaN, suggesting different defects. The DNA-binding domain substitutions are within sigmaN sequences previously shown to be buried upon formation of the wild-type holoenzyme or closed complex, suggesting that, in the mutants, alteration of the sigmaN-core and sigmaN-DNA interfaces has occurred to change holoenzyme activity. Core-binding assays with the mutant sigmas support this view. Interestingly, an internal deletion form of sigmaN lacking the major core binding determinant was able to assemble into holoenzyme and, although unable to support activator-dependent transcription, formed a stable activator-independent holoenzyme promoter complex on premelted DNA templates.

Region I modifies DNA-binding domain conformation of sigma 54 within the holoenzyme

Activation of transcription at sigma 54-dependent bacterial promoters proceeds via a mechanism that is independent of recruitment of RNA polymerase to the promoter, but is instead totally dependent on activator-driven conformational changes in the promoter-bound RNA polymerase. Understanding of the activation mechanism first requires a detailed description of the interactions taking place in the polymerase holoenzyme and closed complex. The interactions of sigma 54 with core RNA polymerase and promoter DNA were investigated using enzymatic and chemical (hydroxyl radical) protease footprinting of sigma. Regions of sigma were identified that are in direct contact with ligands, or whose conformation changes following ligand binding. A comparison of wild-type sigma and a mutant bearing a deletion of conserved Region I, which is required for response to activator proteins and regulated initiation, revealed differences in the protease sensitivity of free sigma indicating that Region I affects sigma conformation. Comparison of the holoenzyme and closed complex hydroxyl radical footprints revealed that residues of wild-type sigma protected by promoter DNA overlap, to a large extent, the residues of Region I-deleted sigma protected by core polymerase. Region I could thus modify DNA-binding by changing conformation of the DNA-binding domain of sigma 54 in a core polymerase-dependent manner. These differences can account for the modified promoter binding of the Region I-deleted sigma holoenzyme observed by DNA footprinting, and are likely of significance to the Region I-dependent activation of transcription.

Promoter opening via a DNA fork junction binding activity

The rate-limiting step in transcriptional initiation typically is opening the promoter DNA to expose the template strand. Opening is tightly regulated, but how it occurs is not known. These experiments identify an activity, recognition of specific DNA fork junctions, and suggest that it is critical to bacterial promoter opening. This activity is both sequence and structure specific; it recognizes the bases that constitute the upstream double-stranded/single-stranded boundary of the open complex. Promoter mutations known to reduce opening rates lead to comparable reductions in fork junction binding affinity. The activity acts to establish the upstream boundary of melted DNA and works in conjunction with two single-stranded DNA binding activities that recognize separately the two melted strands. The junction binding activity is contained within the sigma factor component of the holoenzyme. The activity occurs in both a typical prokaryotic transcription system and in a eukaryotic-like bacterial system that responds to enhancers and needs ATP. Thus DNA opening catalyzed by fork junction binding may occur in a variety of systems in which DNA must be opened to be copied.

Probing the assembly of transcription initiation complexes through changes in sigmaN protease sensitivity

The alternative bacterial sigmaN RNA polymerase holoenzyme binds promoters as a transcriptionally inactive complex that is activated by enhancer-binding proteins. Little is known about how sigma factors respond to their ligands or how the responses lead to transcription. To examine the liganded state of sigmaN, the assembly of end-labeled Klebsiella pneumoniae sigmaN into holoenzyme, closed promoter complexes, and initiated transcription complexes was analyzed by enzymatic protein footprinting. V8 protease-sensitive sites in free sigmaN were identified in the acidic region II and bordering or within the minimal DNA binding domain. Interaction with core RNA polymerase prevented cleavage at noncontiguous sites in region II and at some DNA binding domain sites, probably resulting from conformational changes. Formation of closed complexes resulted in further protections within the DNA binding domain, suggesting close contact to promoter DNA. Interestingly, residue E36 becomes sensitive to proteolysis in initiated transcription complexes, indicating a conformational change in holoenzyme during initiation. Residue E36 is located adjacent to an element involved in nucleating strand separation and in inhibiting polymerase activity in the absence of activation. The sensitivity of E36 may reflect one or both of these functions. Changing patterns of protease sensitivity strongly indicate that sigmaN can adjust conformation upon interaction with ligands, a property likely important in the dynamics of the protein during transcription initiation.

Multiple pathways to bypass the enhancer requirement of sigma 54 RNA polymerase: roles for DNA and protein determinants

Sigma 54 is a required factor for bacterial RNA polymerase to respond to enhancers and directs a mechanism that is a hybrid between bacterial and eukaryotic transcription. Three pathways were found that bypass the enhancer requirement in vitro. These rely on either deletion of the sigma 54 N terminus or destruction of the DNA consensus -12 promoter recognition element or altering solution conditions to favor transient DNA melting. Each of these allows unstable heparin-sensitive pre-initiation complexes to form that can be driven to transcribe in the absence of both enhancer protein and ATP beta-gamma hydrolysis. These disparate pathways are proposed to have a common basis in that multiple N-terminal contacts may mediate the interactions between the polymerase and the DNA region where melting originates. The results raise possibilities for common features of open complex formation by different RNA polymerases.