Structure of the von Willebrand factor domain interacting with glycoprotein Ib

The soluble N-terminal autoinhibitory module of the A1 domain in von Willebrand factor partially suppresses its catch bond with glycoprotein Ibα in a sandwich complex

von Willebrand factor (VWF) senses and responds to the hemodynamic forces to interact with the circulatory system and platelets in hemostasis and thrombosis. The dark side of this mechanobiology is implicated in atherothrombosis, stroke, and, more recently, the COVID-19 thrombotic symptoms. The force-responsive element controlling VWF activation predominantly resides in the N terminal auto-inhibitory module (N-AIM) flanking its A1 domain. Nevertheless, the detailed mechano-chemistry of soluble VWF N-AIM is poorly understood at the sub-molecular level as it is assumed to be unstructured loops. Using the free molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we first predicted a hairpin-like structure of the soluble A1 N-AIM derived polypeptide (Lp; sequences Q1238-E1260). Then we combined molecular docking and steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulations to examine how Lp regulates the A1-GPIbα interaction under tensile forces. Our simulation results indicate that Lp suppresses the catch bond in a sandwich complex of A1-Lp-GPIbα yet contributes an additional catch-bond residue D1249. To experimentally benchmark the binding kinetics for A1-GPIbα in the absence or presence of Lp, we conducted the force spectroscopy-biomembrane force probe (BFP) assays. We found similar suppression on the A1-GPIbα catch bond with soluble Lp in presence. Clinically, as more and more therapeutic candidates targeting the A1-GPIbα axis have entered clinical trials to treat patients with TTP and acute coronary syndrome, our work represents an endeavor further towards an effective anti-thrombotic approach without severe bleeding side effects as most existing drugs suffer.

Role of von Willebrand factor in venous thromboembolic disease

Objective

Evolving evidence of the shared risk factors and pathogenic mechanisms in arterial and venous thrombosis questions of the strict vascular dichotomy of arterial vs venous. The connection between arterial and venous thrombosis has been highlighted by common underlying inflammatory processes, a concept known as thromboinflammatory disease. Using this relationship, we can apply knowledge from arterial disease to better understand and potentially mitigate venous disease. A protein that has been extensively studied in atherothrombotic disease and inflammation is von Willebrand factor (VWF). Because many predisposing and provoking factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been shown to directly modulate VWF levels, it is, perhaps, not surprising that VWF has been highlighted by several recent association studies of patients with VTE.

Methods

In the present narrative review, we investigated more deeply the effects of VWF in venous disease by synthesizing the data from clinical studies of deep vein thrombosis of the limbs, pulmonary embolism, portal and cerebral vein thrombosis, and the complications of thrombosis, including post-thrombotic syndrome, venous insufficiency, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. We have also discussed the findings from preclinical studies to highlight novel VWF biochemistry in thrombosis and therapeutics.

Results

Across the spectrum of venous thromboembolic disease, we consistently observed that elevated VWF levels conferred an increased risk of VTE and long-term venous complications. We have highlighted important findings from VWF molecular research and have proposed mechanisms by which VWF participates in venous disease. Emerging evidence from preclinical studies might reveal novel targets for thromboinflammatory disease, including specific VWF pathophysiology. Furthermore, we have highlighted the utility of measuring VWF to prognosticate and risk stratify for VTE and its complications.

Conclusions

As the prevalence of inflammatory processes, such as aging, obesity, and diabetes increases in our population, it is critical to understand the evolving role of VWF in venous disease to guide clinical decisions and therapeutics.

Activation of von Willebrand factor via mechanical unfolding of its discontinuous autoinhibitory module

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) activates in response to shear flow to initiate hemostasis, while aberrant activation could lead to thrombosis. Above a critical shear force, the A1 domain of VWF becomes activated and captures platelets via the GPIb-IX complex. Here we show that the shear-responsive element controlling VWF activation resides in the discontinuous autoinhibitory module (AIM) flanking A1. Application of tensile force in a single-molecule setting induces cooperative unfolding of the AIM to expose A1. The AIM-unfolding force is lowered by truncating either N- or C-terminal AIM region, type 2B VWD mutations, or binding of a ristocetin-mimicking monoclonal antibody, all of which could activate A1. Furthermore, the AIM is mechanically stabilized by the nanobody that comprises caplacizumab, the only FDA-approved anti-thrombotic drug to-date that targets VWF. Thus, the AIM is a mechano-regulator of VWF activity. Its conformational dynamics may define the extent of VWF autoinhibition and subsequent activation under force.

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a large glycoprotein in the blood secreted from endothelial cells lining the blood vessel and activation of VWF leads to formation of VWF-platelet complexes or thrombi. Here authors use single-molecule force measurement, X-ray crystallography and functional measurements to monitor the activation of VWF via mechanical unfolding of the autoinhibitory module (AIM).

Glycosylation sterically inhibits platelet adhesion to von Willebrand factor without altering intrinsic conformational dynamics

BACKGROUND

A molecular basis for von Willebrand factor (VWF) self-inhibition has been proposed by which the N-terminal and C-terminal flanking sequences of the globular A1 domain disulfide loop bind to and suppress the conformational dynamics of A1. These flanking sequences are rich in O-linked glycosylation (OLG), which is known to suppress platelet adhesion to VWF, presumably by steric hindrance. The inhibitory mechanism remains unresolved as to whether inhibition is due to steric exclusion by OLGs or a direct self-association interaction that stabilizes the domain.

OBJECTIVES

The platelet adhesive function, thermodynamic stability, and conformational dynamics of the wild-type and type 2M G1324S A1 domain lacking glycosylation (Escherichia coli) are compared with the wild-type glycosylated A1 domain (HEK293 cell culture) to decipher the self-inhibitory mechanism.

METHODS

Surface plasmon resonance and analytical rheology are utilized to assess Glycoprotein Ibα (GPIbα) binding at equilibrium and platelet adhesion under shear flow. The conformational stability is assessed through a combination of protein unfolding thermodynamics and hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HXMS).

RESULTS

A1 glycosylation inhibits both GPIbα binding and platelet adhesion. Glycosylation increases the hydrodynamic size of A1 and stabilizes the thermal unfolding of A1 without changing its equilibrium stability. Glycosylation does not alter the intrinsic conformational dynamics of the A1 domain.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies invalidate the proposed inhibition through conformational suppression since glycosylation within these flanking sequences does not alter the native state stability or the conformational dynamics of A1. Rather, they confirm a mechanism by which glycosylation sterically hinders platelet adhesion to the A1 domain at equilibrium and under rheological shear stress.

Delimiting the autoinhibitory module of von Willebrand factor

Essentials The self-inhibitory mechanism of von Willebrand factor (VWF) remains unclear. Residues flanking the A1 domain of VWF form a discontinuous autoinhibitory module (AIM). rVWF1238-1493 exhibited greater thermostability and inactivity than its shorter counterparts. The cooperative coupling between the N- and C- AIM regions are required for inhibiting A1.

SUMMARY

Background The hierarchical hemostasis response involves a self-inhibitory feature of von Willebrand factor (VWF) that has not been fully characterized. The residues flanking the A1 domain of VWF are important in this self-inhibition by forming an autoinhibitory module (AIM) that masks the A1 domain. Objectives To delimit the AIM sequence and to evaluate the cooperative interplay between the discontinuous AIM regions. Methods ELISA, flow cytometry, a thermal stability assay and hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX) mass spectrometry were used to characterize recombinant VWF A1 fragments varying in length. Results The longest A1 fragment (rVWF1238-1493 ) showed higher inactivity in binding the platelet receptor glycoprotein (GP) Ibα and greater thermostability than its shorter counterparts. The HDX results showed that most of the N-terminal residues and residues 1459-1478 at the C-terminus of rVWF1238-1493 have slower deuterium uptake than the residues in its denatured counterpart, implying that these residues may interact with the A1 domain. In contrast, residues 1479-1493 showed less difference from the denatured form, indicating that these residues are unlikely to be involved in binding the A1 domain. The A1 fragment that lacks either the entire C-terminal flanking region of the AIM (C-AIM), i.e. rVWF1238-1461 , or the entire N-terminal flanking region of the AIM (N-AIM), i.e. rVWF1271-1493 , showed high GPIbα-binding affinity and low thermostability, suggesting that removal of either N-terminal or C-terminal residues resulted in loss of AIM inhibition of the A1 domain. Conclusion The AIM is probably composed of residues 1238-1271 (N-AIM) and 1459-1478 (C-AIM). Neither the N-AIM nor the C-AIM alone could fully inhibit binding of the A1 domain to GPIbα.

14-3-3 proteins in platelet biology and glycoprotein Ib-IX signaling

Members of the 14-3-3 family of proteins function as adapters/modulators that recognize phosphoserine/phosphothreonine-based binding motifs in many intracellular proteins and play fundamental roles in signal transduction pathways of eukaryotic cells. In platelets, 14-3-3 plays a wide range of regulatory roles in phosphorylation-dependent signaling pathways, including G-protein signaling, cAMP signaling, agonist-induced phosphatidylserine exposure, and regulation of mitochondrial function. In particular, 14-3-3 interacts with several phosphoserine-dependent binding sites in the major platelet adhesion receptor, the glycoprotein Ib-IX complex (GPIb-IX), regulating its interaction with von Willebrand factor (VWF) and mediating VWF/GPIb-IX-dependent mechanosignal transduction, leading to platelet activation. The interaction of 14-3-3 with GPIb-IX also plays a critical role in enabling the platelet response to low concentrations of thrombin through cooperative signaling mediated by protease-activated receptors and GPIb-IX. The various functions of 14-3-3 in platelets suggest that it is a possible target for the treatment of thrombosis and inflammation.

Overview of small bowel angioectasias: clinical presentation and treatment options

Elderly patients with multiple co-morbidities are at an increased risk of developing small bowel angioectasias. Treating these lesions can be both challenging and costly with patients requiring extensive investigations and recurrent admissions for iron infusions and blood transfusions as well as invasive procedures. This review presents treatment options and describes in detail drugs that should be considered whilst taking into account their effectiveness and their safety profile. Areas covered: A PubMed search was carried out using the following keywords: small bowel angiodysplasias, small bowel angioectasias, small bowel bleeding and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding to assess existing evidence. The pathophysiology and risk factors are covered in this review together with appropriate methods of investigation and management. Treatment options discussed are endoscopic measures, surgical options and pharmacotherapy. The role of serum biomarkers is also discussed. Expert commentary: Future work should be directed at alternative drugs with a good safety profile that target biomarkers. Novel pharmacotherapy directed at biomarkers could potentially provide a non-invasive treatment option for angioectasias particularly in the elderly where management can be challenging.

Evaluation of a microfluidic flow assay to screen for von Willebrand disease and low von Willebrand factor levels

Essentials von Willebrand factor (VWF) function is shear stress dependent. Platelet accumulation in a microfluidic assay correlates with VWF levels. The microfluidic assay discriminates type 1 von Willebrand disease from healthy controls. The microfluidic flow assay detects responses to therapeutic intervention (DDAVP).

SUMMARY

Background von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a mucocutaneous bleeding disorder with a reported prevalence of 1 in 10 000. von Willebrand factor (VWF) function and platelet adhesion are regulated by hemodynamic forces that are not integrated into most current clinical assays. Objective We evaluated whether a custom microfluidic flow assay (MFA) can screen for deficiencies in VWF in patients presenting with mucocutaneous bleeding. Methods Whole blood from individuals with mucocutaneous bleeding was assayed in a custom MFA. Results Thirty-two patients with type 1 VWD (10/32) or reported mucocutaneous bleeding were enrolled. The platelet adhesion velocity (r = 0.5978 for 750 s-1 and 0.6895 for 1500 s-1 ) and the maximum platelet surface area coverage (r = 0.5719 for 750 s-1 and 0.6633 for 1500 s-1 ) in the MFA correlated with VWF levels. Furthermore, the platelet adhesion velocity at 750 s-1 (type 1 VWD, mean 0.0009761, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0003404-0.001612; control, mean 0.003587, 95% CI 0.002455-0.004719) and at 1500 s-1 (type 1 VWD, mean 0.0003585, 95% CI 0.00003914-0.0006778; control, mean 0.003132, 95% CI 0.001565-0.004699) differentiated type 1 VWD from controls. Maximum platelet surface area coverage at 750 s-1 (type 1 VWD, mean 0.1831, 95% CI 0.03816-0.3281; control, mean 0.6755, 95% CI 0.471-0.88) and at 1500 s-1 (type 1 VWD, mean 0.07873, 95% CI 0.01689-0.1406; control, mean 0.6432, 95% CI 0.3607-0.9257) also differentiated type 1 VWD from controls. We also observed an improvement in platelet accumulation after 1-desamino-8-d-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP) treatment at 1500 s-1 (pre-DDAVP, mean 0.4784, 95% CI 0.1777-0.7791; post-DDAVP, mean 0.8444, 95% CI 0.7162-0.9726). Conclusions These data suggest that this approach can be used as a screening tool for VWD.

A discontinuous autoinhibitory module masks the A1 domain of von Willebrand factor

Essentials The mechanism for the auto-inhibition of von Willebrand factor (VWF) remains unclear. Hydrogen exchange of two VWF A1 fragments with disparate activities was measured and compared. Discontinuous residues flanking A1 form a structural module that blocks A1 binding to the platelet. Our results suggest a potentially unified model of VWF activation. Click to hear an ISTH Academy presentation on the domain architecture of VWF and activation by elongational flow by Dr Springer SUMMARY: Background How von Willebrand factor (VWF) senses and responds to shear flow remains unclear. In the absence of shear flow, VWF or its fragments can be induced to bind spontaneously to platelet GPIbα. Objectives To elucidate the auto-inhibition mechanism of VWF. Methods Hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX) of two recombinant VWF fragments expressed from baby hamster kidney cells were measured and compared. Results The shortA1 protein contains VWF residues 1261-1472 and binds GPIbα with a significantly higher affinity than the longA1 protein that contains VWF residues 1238-1472. Both proteins contain the VWF A1 domain (residues 1272-1458). Many residues in longA1, particularly those in the N- and C-terminal sequences flanking the A1 domain, and in helix α1, loops α1β2 and β3α2, demonstrated markedly reduced HDX compared with their counterparts in shortA1. The HDX-protected region in longA1 overlaps with the GPIbα-binding interface and is clustered with type 2B von Willebrand disease (VWD) mutations. Additional comparison with the HDX of denatured longA1 and ristocetin-bound longA1 indicates the N- and C-terminal sequences flanking the A1 domain form cooperatively an integrated autoinhibitory module (AIM) that interacts with the HDX-protected region. Binding of ristocetin to the C-terminal part of the AIM desorbs the AIM from A1 and enables longA1 binding to GPIbα. Conclusion The discontinuous AIM binds the A1 domain and prevents it from binding to GPIbα, which has significant implications for the pathogenesis of type 2B VWD and the shear-induced activation of VWF activity.

A biophysical view on von Willebrand factor activation

The process of hemostatic plug formation at sites of vascular injury crucially relies on the large multimeric plasma glycoprotein von Willebrand factor (VWF) and its ability to recruit platelets to the damaged vessel wall via interaction of its A1 domain with platelet GPIbα. Under normal blood flow conditions, VWF multimers exhibit a very low binding affinity for platelets. Only when subjected to increased hydrodynamic forces, which primarily occur in connection with vascular injury, VWF can efficiently bind to platelets. This force-regulation of VWF's hemostatic activity is not only highly intriguing from a biophysical perspective, but also of eminent physiological importance. On the one hand, it prevents undesired activity of VWF in intact vessels that could lead to thromboembolic complications and on the other hand, it enables efficient VWF-mediated platelet aggregation exactly where needed. Here, we review recent studies that mainly employed biophysical approaches in order to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the complex mechano-regulation of the VWF-GPIbα interaction. Their results led to two main hypotheses: first, intramolecular shielding of the A1 domain is lifted upon force-induced elongation of VWF; second, force-induced conformational changes of A1 convert it from a low-affinity to a high-affinity state. We critically discuss these hypotheses and aim at bridging the gap between the large-scale behavior of VWF as a linear polymer in hydrodynamic flow and the detailed properties of the A1-GPIbα bond at the single-molecule level.

Crucial role for the VWF A1 domain in binding to type IV collagen

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) contains binding sites for platelets and for vascular collagens to facilitate clot formation at sites of injury. Although previous work has shown that VWF can bind type IV collagen (collagen 4), little characterization of this interaction has been performed. We examined the binding of VWF to collagen 4 in vitro and extended this characterization to a murine model of defective VWF-collagen 4 interactions. The interactions of VWF and collagen 4 were further studied using plasma samples from a large study of both healthy controls and subjects with different types of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Our results show that collagen 4 appears to bind VWF exclusively via the VWF A1 domain, and that specific sequence variations identified through VWF patient samples and through site-directed mutagenesis in the VWF A1 domain can decrease or abrogate this interaction. In addition, VWF-dependent platelet binding to collagen 4 under flow conditions requires an intact VWF A1 domain. We observed that decreased binding to collagen 4 was associated with select VWF A1 domain sequence variations in type 1 and type 2M VWD. This suggests an additional mechanism through which VWF variants may alter hemostasis.

Interaction of von Willebrand factor with platelets and the vessel wall

The initiation of thrombus formation at sites of vascular injury to secure haemostasis after tissue trauma requires the interaction of surface-exposed von Willebrand factor (VWF) with its primary platelet receptor, the glycoprotein (GP) Ib-IX-V complex. As an insoluble component of the extracellular matrix (ECM) of endothelial cells, VWF can directly initiate platelet adhesion. Circulating plasma VWF en-hances matrix VWF activity by binding to structures that become exposed to flowing blood, notably collagen type I and III in deeper layers of the vessel along with microfibrillar collagen type VI in the subendothelium. Moreover, plasma VWF is required to support platelet-to-platelet adhesion - i. e. aggregation - which promotes thrombus growth and consolidation. For these reasons, understanding how plasma VWF interaction with platelet receptors is regulated, particularly any distinctive features of GPIb binding to soluble as opposed to immobilized VWF, is of paramount importance in vascular biology. This brief review will highlight knowledge acquired and key problems that remain to be solved to elucidate fully the role of VWF in normal haemostasis and pathological thrombosis.

Platelet GpIba binding to von Willebrand Factor under fluid shear:contributions of the D′D3-domain, A1-domain flanking peptide and O-linked glycans

BACKGROUND

Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) A1-domain binding to platelet receptor GpIbα is an important fluid-shear dependent interaction that regulates both soluble VWF binding to platelets, and platelet tethering onto immobilized VWF. We evaluated the roles of different structural elements at the N-terminus of the A1-domain in regulating shear dependent platelet binding. Specifically, the focus was on the VWF D'D3-domain, A1-domain N-terminal flanking peptide (NFP), and O-glycans on this peptide.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Full-length dimeric VWF (ΔPro-VWF), dimeric VWF lacking the D'D3 domain (ΔD'D3-VWF), and ΔD'D3-VWF variants lacking either the NFP (ΔD'D3NFP(─)-VWF) or just O-glycans on this peptide (ΔD'D3OG(─)-VWF) were expressed. Monomeric VWF-A1 and D'D3-A1 were also produced. In ELISA, the apparent dissociation constant (KD) of soluble ΔPro-VWF binding to immobilized GpIbα (KD≈100 nmol/L) was 50- to 100-fold higher than other proteins lacking the D'D3 domain (KD~0.7 to 2.5 nmol/L). Additionally, in surface plasmon resonance studies, the on-rate of D'D3-A1 binding to immobilized GpIbα (kon=1.8±0.4×10(4) (mol/L)(-1)·s(-1); KD=1.7 μmol/L) was reduced compared with the single VWF-A1 domain (kon=5.1±0.4×10(4) (mol/L)(-1)·s(-1); KD=1.2 μmol/L). Thus, VWF-D'D3 primarily controls soluble VWF binding to GpIbα. In contrast, upon VWF immobilization, all molecular features regulated A1-GpIbα binding. Here, in ELISA, the number of apparent A1-domain sites available for binding GpIbα on ΔPro-VWF was ≈50% that of the ΔD'D3-VWF variants. In microfluidics based platelet adhesion measurements on immobilized VWF and thrombus formation assays on collagen, human platelet recruitment varied as ΔPro-VWF<ΔD'D3-VWF<ΔD'D3NFP(─)-VWF<ΔD'D3OG(─)-VWF.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas VWF-D'D3 is the major regulator of soluble VWF binding to platelet GpIbα, both the D'D3-domain and N-terminal peptide regulate platelet translocation and thrombus formation.

The linker between the D3 and A1 domains of vWF suppresses A1-GPIbα catch bonds by site-specific binding to the A1 domain

Platelet attachment to von Willebrand factor (vWF) requires the interaction between the platelet GP1bα and exposed vWF-A1 domains. Structural insights into the mechanism of the A1-GP1bα interaction have been limited to an N-terminally truncated A1 domain that lacks residues Q1238  - E1260 that make up the linker between the D3 and A1 domains of vWF. We have demonstrated that removal of these residues destabilizes quaternary interactions in the A1A2A3 tridomain and contributes to platelet activation under high shear (Auton et al., J Biol Chem 2012;287:14579-14585). In this study, we demonstrate that removal of these residues from the single A1 domain enhances platelet pause times on immobilized A1 under rheological shear. A rigorous comparison between the truncated A1-1261 and full length A1-1238 domains demonstrates a kinetic stabilization of the A1 domain induced by these N-terminal residues as evident in the enthalpy of the unfolding transition. This stabilization occurs through site and sequence-specific binding of the N-terminal peptide to A1. Binding of free N-terminal peptide to A1-1261 has an affinity KD=46±6μM and this binding although free to dissociate is sufficient to suppress the platelet pause times to levels comparable to A1-1238 under shear stress. Our results support a dual-structure/function role for this linker region involving a conformational equilibria that maintains quaternary A domain associations in the inactive state of vWF at low shear and an intra-A1-domain conformation that regulates the strength of platelet GP1bα-vWF A1 domain associations in the active state of vWF at high shear.

The N-terminal flanking region of the A1 domain regulates the force-dependent binding of von Willebrand factor to platelet glycoprotein Ibα

Binding of platelet glycoprotein Ibα (GPIbα) to von Willebrand factor (VWF) initiates platelet adhesion to disrupted vascular surface under arterial blood flow. Flow exerts forces on the platelet that are transmitted to VWF-GPIbα bonds, which regulate their dissociation. Mutations in VWF and/or GPIbα may alter the mechanical regulation of platelet adhesion to cause hemostatic defects as found in patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD). Using a biomembrane force probe, we observed biphasic force-decelerated (catch) and force-accelerated (slip) dissociation of GPIbα from VWF. The VWF A1 domain that contains the N-terminal flanking sequence Gln(1238)-Glu(1260) (1238-A1) formed triphasic slip-catch-slip bonds with GPIbα. By comparison, using a short form of A1 that deletes this sequence (1261-A1) abolished the catch bond, destabilizing its binding to GPIbα at high forces. Importantly, shear-dependent platelet rolling velocities on these VWF ligands in a flow chamber system mirrored the force-dependent single-bond lifetimes. Adding the Gln(1238)-Glu(1260) peptide, which interacted with GPIbα and 1261-A1 but not 1238-A1, to whole blood decreased platelet attachment under shear stress. Soluble Gln(1238)-Glu(1260) reduced the lifetimes of GPIbα bonds with VWF and 1238-A1 but rescued the catch bond of GPIbα with 1261-A1. A type 2B VWD 1238-A1 mutation eliminated the catch bond by prolonging lifetimes at low forces, a type 2M VWD 1238-A1 mutation shifted the respective slip-catch and catch-slip transition points to higher forces, whereas a platelet type VWD GPIbα mutation enhanced the bond lifetime in the entire force regime. These data reveal the structural determinants of VWF activation by hemodynamic force of the circulation.

N-terminal flanking region of A1 domain in von Willebrand factor stabilizes structure of A1A2A3 complex and modulates platelet activation under shear stress

von Willebrand factor (vWF) mediates platelet adhesion and thrombus formation via its interaction with the platelet receptor glycoprotein (GP)Ibα. We have analyzed two A1A2A3 tri-domain proteins to demonstrate that the amino acid sequence, Gln(1238)-Glu(1260), in the N-terminal flanking region of the A1 domain, together with the association between the A domains, modulates vWF-GPIbα binding and platelet activation under shear stress. Using circular dichroism spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry, we have described that sequence Gln(1238)-Glu(1260) stabilizes the structural conformation of the A1A2A3 tri-domain complex. The structural stabilization imparted by this particular region inhibits the binding capacity of the tri-domain protein for GPIbα. Deletion of this region causes a conformational change in the A1 domain that increases binding to GPIbα. Only the truncated protein was capable of effectively blocking ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination. To determine the capacity of activating platelets via the interaction with GPIbα, whole blood was incubated with the N-terminal region truncated or intact tri-A domain protein prior to perfusion over a fibrin(ogen)-coated surface. At a high shear rate of 1,500 s(-1), platelets from blood containing the truncated protein rapidly bound, covering >90% of the fibrin(ogen) surface area, whereas the intact tri-A domain protein induced platelets to bind <10%. The results obtained in this study ascertain the relevant role of the structural association between the N-terminal flanking region of the A1 domain (amino acids Gln(1238)-Glu(1260)) and the A1A2A3 domain complex in preventing vWF to bind spontaneously to GPIbα in solution under high shear forces.

Destabilization of the A1 domain in von Willebrand factor dissociates the A1A2A3 tri-domain and provokes spontaneous binding to glycoprotein Ibalpha and platelet activation under shear stress

This study used recombinant A1A2A3 tri-domain proteins to demonstrate that A domain association in von Willebrand factor (VWF) regulates the binding to platelet glycoprotein Ibalpha (GPIbalpha). We performed comparative studies between wild type (WT) A1 domain and the R1450E variant that dissociates the tri-domain complex by destabilizing the A1 domain. Using urea denaturation and differential scanning calorimetry, we demonstrated the destabilization of the A1 domain structure concomitantly results in a reduced interaction among the three A domains. This dissociation results in spontaneous binding of R1450E to GPIbalpha without ristocetin with an apparent K(D) of 85 +/- 34 nm, comparable with that of WT (36 +/- 12 nm) with ristocetin. The mutant blocked 100% ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination, whereas WT failed to inhibit. The mutant enhanced shear-induced platelet aggregation at 500 and 5000 s(-1) shear rates, reaching 42 and 66%, respectively. Shear-induced platelet aggregation did not exceed 18% in the presence of WT. A1A2A3 variants were added before perfusion over a fibrin(ogen)-coated surface. At 1500 s(-1), platelets from blood containing WT adhered <10% of the surface area, whereas the mutant induced platelets to rapidly bind, covering 100% of the fibrin(ogen) surface area. Comparable results were obtained with multimeric VWF when ristocetin (0.5 mg/ml) was added to blood before perfusion. EDTA or antibodies against GPIbalpha and alphaIIbbeta3 blocked the effect of the mutant and ristocetin on platelet activation/adhesion. Therefore, the termination of A domain association within VWF in solution results in binding to GPIba and platelet activation under high shear stress.

Common VWF exon 28 polymorphisms in African Americans affecting the VWF activity assay by ristocetin cofactor

The diagnosis of von Willebrand disease relies on abnormalities in specific tests of von Willebrand factor (VWF), including VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo). When examining healthy controls enrolled in the T. S. Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of von Willebrand disease, we, like others, found a lower mean VWF:RCo compared with VWF:Ag in African American controls and therefore sought a genetic cause for these differences. For the African American controls, the presence of 3 exon 28 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), I1380V, N1435S, and D1472H, was associated with a significantly lower VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio, whereas the presence of D1472H alone was associated with a decreased ratio in both African American and Caucasian controls. Multivariate analysis comparing race, SNP status, and VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio confirmed that only the presence of D1472H was significant. No difference was seen in VWF binding to collagen, regardless of SNP status. Similarly, no difference in activity was seen using a GPIb complex-binding assay that is independent of ristocetin. Because the VWF:RCo assay depends on ristocetin binding to VWF, mutations (and polymorphisms) in VWF may affect the measurement of "VWF activity" by this assay and may not reflect a functional defect or true hemorrhagic risk.

Multi-step binding of ADAMTS-13 to von Willebrand factor

BACKGROUND

ADAMTS-13 proteolytic activity is controlled by the conformation of its substrate, von Willebrand factor (VWF), and changes in the secondary structure of VWF are essential for efficient cleavage. Substrate recognition is mediated through several non-catalytic domains in ADAMTS-13 distant from the active site.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that not all binding sites for ADAMTS-13 in VWF are cryptic and analyzed binding of native VWF to ADAMTS-13.

METHODS

Immunoprecipiation of VWF-ADAMTS-13 complexes using anti-VWF antibodies and magnetic beads was used. Binding was assessed by Western blotting and immunosorbent assays.

RESULTS

Co-immunoprecipitation demonstrated that ADAMTS-13 binds to native multimeric VWF (K(d) of 79 +/- 11 nmol L(-1)) with no measurable proteolysis. Upon shear-induced unfolding of VWF, binding increased 3-fold and VWF was cleaved. Binding to native VWF was saturable, time dependent, reversible and did not vary with ionic strength (I of 50-200). Moreover, results with ADAMTS-13 deletion mutants indicated that binding to native VWF is mediated through domains distal to the ADAMTS-13 spacer, probably thrombospondin-1 repeats. Interestingly, this interaction occurs in normal human plasma with an ADAMTS-13 to VWF stoichiometry of 0.0040 +/- 0.0004 (mean +/- SEM, n = 10).

CONCLUSIONS

ADAMTS-13 binds to circulating VWF and may therefore be incorporated into a platelet-rich thrombus, where it can immediately cleave VWF that is unfolded by fluid shear stress.

Limitations of the ristocetin cofactor assay in measurement of von Willebrand factor function

BACKGROUND

Type 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) is characterized by a qualitative defect in von Willebrand factor (VWF) and diagnosed by a disproportionate decrease in VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) as compared with VWF antigen (VWF:Ag).

OBJECTIVE

We report here on the spurious diagnosis of VWD in a patient with a sequence variation in the ristocetin-binding domain of VWF.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The index case had a VWF:RCo of 11 IU dL(-1), with VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio of 0.09. DNA sequencing revealed a novel P1467S mutation in a known ristocetin-binding region of the A1 domain. Because of the discrepancy between the laboratory findings, consistent with type 2M VWD, and the patient's lack of bleeding symptoms, further studies were performed to determine whether this mutation affected VWF function or merely reduced its ability to interact with ristocetin.

RESULTS

Studies with recombinant VWF showed normal platelet binding with botrocetin, but a significant decrease in binding in response to ristocetin. Ristocetin-induced binding to recombinant GPIb was also absent, but normal binding was seen when a gain-of-function GPIb construct was used in the absence of ristocetin. VWF function under shear stress was normal when analyzed with a cone and plate(let) analyzer.

CONCLUSIONS

The decreased VWF:RCo seen with the P1467S sequence variation likely represents an artifact as a result of the use of ristocetin to measure VWF activity. The normal VWF function in other assays correlates with the lack of hemorrhagic symptoms, and suggests the need for more physiologically relevant assays of VWF function.

Mutation of the H-bond acceptor S119 in the ADAMTS13 metalloprotease domain reduces secretion and substrate turnover in a patient with congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura is caused by mutations in a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS13) resulting in defective processing of von Willebrand factor (VWF) that causes intravascular platelet aggregation culminating in thrombocytopenia with shistocytic anemia. In this study the functional and structural role of a recently identified ADAMTS13 metalloprotease domain mutation S119F was investigated. Secretion from heterologous cells was hampered but not completely eliminated. Secreted S119F was active toward multimeric VWF and FRETS-VWF73 but with abnormal kinetics, having a significantly reduced overall catalytic rate (k(cat); 0.88 +/- 0.04 s(-1) vs 2.78 +/- 0.11 s(-1)) and slightly smaller Michaelis constant (K(M); 1.4 +/- 0.2microM vs 2.3 +/- 0.3microM). A computational model of the metalloprotease domain demonstrates both steric and polar interaction effects caused by S119F. Interestingly, mutant S119A has properties similar to S119F (k(cat) = 0.82 +/- 0.03 s(-1) and K(M) = 1.1 +/- 0.1microM), allowing to assign distorted kinetics to the loss of the H-bond with conserved residue W262. We conclude that the S119-W262 H-bond is crucial for maximal turnover.

Cloning of the cDNA for murine von Willebrand factor and identification of orthologous genes reveals the extent of conservation among diverse species

Interaction of von Willebrand factor (VWF) with circulating platelets promotes hemostasis when a blood vessel is injured. The A1 domain of VWF is responsible for the initial interaction with platelets and is well conserved among species. Knowledge of the cDNA and genomic DNA sequences for human VWF allowed us to predict the cDNA sequence for murine VWF in silico and amplify its entire coding region by RT-PCR. The murine VWF cDNA has an open reading frame of 8,442 bp, encoding a protein of 2,813 amino acid residues with 83% identity to human pre-pro-VWF. The same strategy was used to predict in silico the cDNA sequence for the ortholog of VWF in a further six species. Many of these predictions diverged substantially from the putative Reference Sequences derived by ab initio methods. Our predicted sequences indicated that the VWF gene has a conserved structure of 52 exons in all seven mammalian species examined, as well as in the chicken. There is a minor structural variation in the pufferfish Takifugu rubripes insofar as the VWF gene in this species has 53 exons. Comparison of the translated amino acid sequences also revealed a high degree of conservation. In particular, the cysteine residues are conserved precisely throughout both the pro-peptide and the mature VWF sequence in all species, with a minor exception in the pufferfish VWF ortholog where two adjacent cysteine residues are omitted. The marked conservation of cysteine residues emphasizes the importance of the intricate pattern of disulfide bonds in governing the structure of pro-VWF and regulating the function of the mature VWF protein. It should also be emphasized that many of the conserved features of the VWF gene and protein were obscured when the comparison among species was based on the putative Reference Sequences instead of our predicted cDNA sequences.

Evidence-based treatment recommendations for uremic bleeding

Uremic bleeding syndrome is a recognized consequence of renal failure and can result in clinically significant sequelae. Although the pathophysiology of the condition has yet to be fully elucidated, it is believed to be multifactorial. This article is a review of both the normal hemostatic and homeostatic mechanisms that operate within the body to prevent unnecessary bleeding, as well as an in-depth discussion of the dysfunctional components that contribute to the complications associated with uremic bleeding syndrome. As a result of the multifactorial nature of this syndrome, prevention and treatment options can include one or a combination of the following: dialysis, erythropoietin, cryoprecipitate, desmopressin, and conjugated estrogens. Here, these treatment options are compared with regard to their mechanism of action, and onset and duration of efficacy. An extensive review of the clinical trials that have evaluated each treatment is also presented. Lastly, we have created an evidence-based treatment algorithm to help guide clinicians through most clinical scenarios, and answered common questions related to the management of uremic bleeding.

Surface-dependent expression in the platelet GPIb binding domain within human von Willebrand factor studied by atomic force microscopy

Adsorption of plasma proteins such as von Willebrand factor (vWF) on thrombogenic surfaces can induce conformational changes in tertiary structure so that the prothrombotic functional epitopes are exposed for interactions with platelets, resulting in platelet adhesion and thrombus formation. Thus, understanding platelet binding following changes in the structure of vWF is critical in understanding the mechanisms of thrombogenesis. The present study examined the accessibility of platelet binding epitopes within vWF adsorbed on two different thrombogenic surfaces, a hydrophobic synthetic surface and collagen VI coated substrates, under physiological buffer conditions using atomic force microscopy (AFM) in combination with immunogold labeling. Our results demonstrated that the glycoprotein Ib (GPIb) binding domain in vWF undergoes changes when adsorbed on collagen VI compared to vWF on a hydrophobic synthetic surface. This study provides a basis for a novel approach to understand the molecular mechanisms of surface-induced thrombosis by directly examining the structure-function relationships of plasma proteins involved in the thrombus formation.

ABO blood group determines plasma von Willebrand factor levels: a biologic function after all?

For many years, an association between ABO histo-blood group and risk of thrombosis has been recognized. Blood group non-O (A, B, and AB) individuals have consistently been found to demonstrate increased incidence of both arterial and venous thrombotic disease, compared to group O individuals. This increased risk is attributable to the fact that ABO blood group influences plasma levels of a coagulation glycoprotein named von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWF levels are 25 percent higher in non-O compared to group O individuals. The mechanism by which ABO group determines plasma VWF levels has not been determined. ABO(H) carbohydrate antigenic determinants, however, are expressed on the N-linked glycan chains of circulating plasma VWF. This review will focus on the carbohydrate structures of VWF and recent studies suggesting that subtle variations in these structures (particularly differences in ABO blood group antigen expression) may have clinically significant effects on VWF proteolysis and clearance.

Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors Enhance Shear Stress-Induced Platelet Aggregation

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the effect of parecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, on in vivo shear stress-induced platelet aggregation in a rat model of arterial bypass with focal narrowing.

BACKGROUND

Long-term use of COX-2 inhibitors is associated with increased incidence of adverse cardiovascular events, especially in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease. These patients are at risk for thrombotic occlusion of arterial stenoses initiated by shear stress-induced platelet aggregation.

METHODS

To mimic the combination of a tight arterial stenosis and high shear stress in rats, an extracorporeal shunt from carotid to femoral artery was compressed by the rollers of a pump. Platelet aggregation was continuously measured by a photometric detector in the shunt.

RESULTS

Pretreatment with parecoxib (20 mg/kg) almost doubled shear stress-induced platelet aggregation (188% vs. 100% in control subjects, p = 0.0003). This was accompanied by a fall in plasma 6-keto-prostaglandin F(1alpha) from 100 +/- 25 pg/ml to 36 +/- 11 pg/ml (p < 0.0001). Enhanced platelet aggregation was also observed with high-dose aspirin (150 mg/kg) (146%; p = 0.02) but not with low-dose aspirin (25 mg/kg), which reduced aggregation (68%; p = 0.01). The effect of parecoxib was neutralized by low-dose (1 mg/kg) clopidogrel (from 188% to 92%; p = 0.0001), but not by low-dose aspirin (from 188% to 177%; p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of an arterial stenosis, COX-2 inhibitors enhance shear stress-induced platelet aggregation. This enhancement was prevented by low-dose clopidogrel but not by low-dose aspirin. Clopidogrel might therefore allow COX-2 inhibitors to be used without raising risk of thrombotic occlusion.

Activation-independent platelet adhesion and aggregation under elevated shear stress

Platelet aggregation, which contributes to bleeding arrest and also to thrombovascular disorders, is thought to initiate after signaling-induced activation. We found that this paradigm does not apply under blood flow conditions comparable to those existing in stenotic coronary arteries. Platelets interacting with immobilized von Willebrand factor (VWF) aggregate independently of activation when soluble VWF is present and the shear rate exceeds 10 000 s(-1) (shear stress = 400 dyn/cm(2)). Above this threshold, active A1 domains become exposed in soluble VWF multimers and can bind to glycoprotein Ibalpha, promoting additional platelet recruitment. Aggregates thus formed are unstable until the shear rate approaches 20 000 s(-1) (shear stress = 800 dyn/cm.(2)). Above this threshold, adherent platelets at the interface of surface-immobilized and membrane-bound VWF are stretched into elongated structures and become the core of aggregates that can persist on the surface for minutes. When isolated dimeric A1 domain is present instead of native VWF multimers, activation-independent platelet aggregation occurs without requiring shear stress above a threshold level, but aggregates never become firmly attached to the surface and progressively disaggregate as shear rate exceeds 6000 s(-1). Platelet and VWF modulation by hydrodynamic force is a mechanism for activation-independent aggregation that may support thrombotic arterial occlusion.

Shielding of the A1 Domain by the D′D3 Domains of von Willebrand Factor Modulates Its Interaction with Platelet Glycoprotein Ib-IX-V

Soluble von Willebrand factor (VWF) has a low affinity for platelet glycoprotein (GP) Ibalpha and needs immobilization and/or high shear stress to enable binding of its A1 domain to the receptor. The previously described anti-VWF monoclonal antibody 1C1E7 enhances VWF/GPIbalpha binding and recognizes an epitope in the amino acids 764-1035 region in the N-terminal D'D3 domains. In this study we demonstrated that the D'D3 region negatively modulates the VWF/GPIb-IX-V interaction; (i) deletion of the D'D3 region in VWF augmented binding to GPIbalpha, suggesting an inhibitory role for this region, (ii) the isolated D'D3 region inhibited the GPIbalpha interaction of a VWF deletion mutant lacking this region, indicating that intramolecular interactions limit the accessibility of the A1 domain, (iii) using a panel of anti-VWF monoclonal antibodies, we next showed that the D'D3 region is in close proximity with the A1 domain in soluble VWF but not when VWF was immobilized; (iv) destroying the epitope of 1C1E7 resulted in a mutant VWF with an increased affinity for GPIbalpha. Our results support a model of domain translocation in VWF that allows interaction with GPIbalpha. The suggested shielding interaction of the A1 domain by the D'D3 region then becomes disrupted by VWF immobilization.

Crystal structure of the wild-type von Willebrand factor A1-glycoprotein Ibalpha complex reveals conformation differences with a complex bearing von Willebrand disease mutations

The adhesion of platelets to the subendothelium of blood vessels at sites of vascular injury under high shear conditions is mediated by a direct interaction between the platelet receptor glycoprotein Ibalpha (GpIbalpha) and the A1 domain of the von Willebrand factor (VWF). Here we report the 2.6-A crystal structure of a complex comprised of the extracellular domain of GpIbalpha and the wild-type A1 domain of VWF. A direct comparison of this structure to a GpIbalpha-A1 complex containing "gain-of-function" mutations, A1-R543Q and GpIbalpha-M239V, reveals specific structural differences between these complexes at sites near the two GpIbalpha-A1 binding interfaces. At the smaller interface, differences in interaction show that the alpha1-beta2 loop of A1 serves as a conformational switch, alternating between an open alpha1-beta2 isomer that allows faster dissociation of GpIbalpha-A1, as observed in the wild-type complex, and an extended isomer that favors tight association as seen in the complex containing A1 with a type 2B von Willebrand Disease (VWD) mutation associated with spontaneous binding to GpIbalpha. At the larger interface, differences in interaction associated with the GpIbalpha-M239V platelet-type VWD mutation are minor and localized but feature discrete gamma-turn conformers at the loop end of the beta-hairpin structure. The beta-hairpin, stabilized by a strong classic gamma-turn as seen in the mutant complex, relates to the increased affinity of A1 binding, and the beta-hairpin with a weak inverse gamma-turn observed in the wild-type complex corresponds to the lower affinity state of GpIbalpha. These findings provide important details that add to our understanding of how both type 2B and platelet-type VWD mutations affect GpIbalpha-A1 binding affinity.

Sulfatides inhibit platelet adhesion to von Willebrand factor in flowing blood

Sulfatides are sulfated glycosphingolipids present on cell surfaces that bind to adhesive proteins such as von Willebrand factor (VWF), P-selectin, laminin and thrombospondin. Previous studies have localized the sulfatide-binding site of VWF to amino acid residues Gln626-Val646 in the A1 domain. The A1 domain also contains the binding site for platelet glycoprotein Ib (GP Ib), a site that has been reported to be distinct from the sulfatide-binding site. In this study, we analyzed the interaction of sulfatides with VWF and its effect on GP Ib-mediated platelet adhesion under flow conditions. Recombinant VWF A1 domain (rVWF-A1) bound specifically and saturably to sulfatides (half-maximal concentration of approximately 12.5 microg mL(-1)), binding that was blocked by dextran sulfate (IC(50) approximately equal to 100 microg mL(-1)) but not by heparin at concentrations up to 100 U mL(-1). Furthermore, sulfatides (125 microg mL(-1)) prevented the adhesion of platelets or glycocalicin-coupled polystyrene beads to a rVWF-A1-coated surface under high shear stress. In addition, plasma VWF prebound to a sulfatide-coated surface failed to support subsequent platelet adhesion. These results provide firm evidence that sulfatides bind the VWF A1 domain at a site overlapping the GP Ib-binding site.

Platelet aggregation by membrane-expressed A1 domains of von Willebrand Factor is dependent on residues Asp 560 and Gly 561

We have previously demonstrated that the isolated von Willebrand Factor (vWF)-A1-domain can activate platelets in a GPIb-dependent manner. Here we evaluated the functional impact of targeted point mutations Gly561His (G1324(561)H), an analog of a previously described 2M von Willebrand disease variant, and Asp560Ser (D1323(560)S) in the model of the membrane expressed A1-domain. Platelet aggregation in response to COS-7-cells stably transfected with wild type A1-domain was abrogated by both substitutions. Ristocetin did not increase the aggregatory potential of mutant vWF-A1, in contrast to native forms. Botrocetin boosted the aggregatory responses of all A1-domains tested. These data suggest that G1324(561) and D1323(560) comprise part of the GPIb binding motif essential for subsequent platelet aggregation. Botrocetin seems to alter the potential of vWF for GPIb interaction independently of that motif. The experimental system tested here provides a rapid and reproducible approach for the functional analysis of isolated A1-domain interactions with platelet-GPIb.

Shielding the front-strand beta 3 of the von Willebrand factor A1 domain inhibits its binding to platelet glycoprotein Ibalpha

Platelet adhesion to damaged vessel wall and shear-induced platelet aggregation necessitate binding of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) A1 domain to platelet GPIbalpha. Blocking this interaction represents a promising approach to the treatment of arterial thrombosis. Comparison of amino acid sequences of the VWF A1 domain in several species, expressing VWF recognized by the blocking monoclonal antibody AJvW-2, suggested 9 residues (His563, Ile566, Asp570, Ala581, Val584, Ala587, Arg616, Ala618, and Met622) to contribute to the epitope for AJvW-2 or to be part of the GPIbalpha-binding site. Glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-human VWF A1 fusion proteins, in which these amino acids were mutated to their murine counterparts, were tested for their capacity to bind AJvW-2 or heparin, to interfere with botrocetin- or ristocetin-mediated VWF binding to GPIb, or to induce flow-dependent platelet tethering in a perfusion chamber. Thus, mutations His563Arg, Ile566Leu, Asp570Ala, and Ala587Thr, clustered on the outer surface of the A1 domain, dramatically impaired binding of AJvW-2 to A1. The His563Arg, Ile566Leu, and Asp570Ala mutations also impaired the binding of heparin, which competes with AJvW-2 for binding to A1. Perfusion studies revealed that His563, Ile566, Asp570, Arg616, and Ala618 take part in GPIbalpha binding, their mutation-impairing platelet recruitment. In agreement with the surface distribution of VWF type 2M mutations, this study demonstrates overlapping of the epitope for AJvW-2 and the GPIbalpha-binding site, located around the front pocket of the A1 domain and defined by strands beta3, beta4, and helix alpha3, and it provides a mechanistic basis for VWF neutralization by this antibody.

Identification of the regulatory elements of the human von Willebrand factor for binding to platelet GPIb. Importance of structural integrity of the regions flanked by the CYS1272-CYS1458 disulfide bond

In vitro platelet glycoprotein Ib (GPIb) binding of the human von Willebrand factor (VWF) increases markedly by exogenous modulators such as ristocetin or botrocetin, and the binding does not occur in normal circulation. GPIb binding sites have been assigned in the VWF A1 domain, which consists of a disulfide loop Cys1272(509)-Cys1458(695) where amino acid residues are numbered from the starting methionine as +1. The previous numbering from the N-terminal Ser of the mature processed VWF is indicated in parentheses. In contrast, several gain-of-function mutations have been found in two regions comprised of the disulfide loop and its N- and C-terminal flanking regions. In this study, Cys1222(459)-Tyr1271(508), Gln1238(475)-Tyr1271(508), Glu1260(497)-Tyr1271(508), and Asp1459(696)-Asp1472(709) were sequentially deleted of full-length multimeric recombinant VWF. Deletions at either side resulted in normal GPIb binding, indicating that the flanking regions are not GPIb binding sites. However, the addition of a mutation at Arg1308(545) on each deletion mutant resulted in spontaneous GPIb binding without requiring modulators, suggesting that both regions are important for the inhibition of GPIb binding. Spontaneous binding was completely inhibited by monoclonal antibodies that recognize the GPIb binding sites. Interestingly, mutant proteins with N-terminal but not C-terminal deletions lost binding to monoclonal antibodies B328, B710, and 23C7, which selectively inhibit ristocetin-induced GPI binding. Their epitopes were found at His1268(505) or Asp1269(506). The crystallographic structure of the A1 domain suggests that GPIb binding is influenced by the molecular interface between the two regions and that the antibody binding to the interface inhibits binding.

The molecular biology of von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common autosomally inherited bleeding disorder associated with mucosal or trauma-related bleeding in affected individuals. VWD results from either a quantitative or qualitative deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF)--a glycoprotein with essential roles in primary haemostasis and as a carrier of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) in the circulation. In recent years the identification of mutations in the VWF gene in patients with VWD has improved our understanding of the structure and function of the VWF protein, and has illustrated the importance of specific regions of VWF for its interaction with other components of the vasculature. The underlying genetic lesions and associated molecular pathology have been identified in many cases of type 2A, type 2B, type 2M, type 2N and type 3 VWD. However in the most common variant, type 1 VWD, the causative molecular defect is unknown in the large majority of cases. In the absence of an understanding of the molecular pathology underlying type 1 VWD, precise diagnosis and classification of this common disorder remains problematic.

Structure of von Willebrand factor and its function in platelet adhesion and thrombus formation

The adhesive protein von Willebrand factor mediates the initiation and progression of thrombus formation at sites of vascular injury. von Willebrand factor is synthesized in endothelial cells and megakaryocytes as a very large polymer composed of identical subunits. In the plasma, it appears as a series of multimers of regularly decreasing molecular mass, from several thousand to 500 kDa. The size of circulating von Willebrand factor multimers is controlled by proteolytic cleavage carried out by a specific protease. The biological functions of von Willebrand factor are exerted through specific domains that interact with extracellular matrix components and cell membrane receptors to promote the initial tethering and adhesion of platelets to subendothelial surfaces, as well as platelet aggregation. Moreover, von Willebrand factor binds the procoagulant co-enzyme, factor VIII, contributing to its stability and, indirectly, to its function in the generation of fibrin. This chapter presents a review of current knowledge on the structure, biosynthesis and functions of von Willebrand factor.

Von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: an alternative to ristocetin co-factor activity?

The capability of von Willebrand factor (VWF) to bind platelet glycoprotein Ib (GPIb) and promote platelet plug formation is currently evaluated in vitro using the ristocetin co-factor activity (VWF:RCo) assay. The replacement of this cumbersome and not always reproducible test with the collagen binding activity of VWF (VWF:CBA) has been attempted with controversial results. To evaluate the capacity of VWF:CBA to identify classic and variant von Willebrand disease (VWD) compared with VWF:RCo, we studied 10 type 2A and 12 type 2B VWD patients, together with 30 type 1 VWD patients with reduced platelet VWF content. In both 2A and 2B VWD, VWF:CBA and VWF:RCo were decreased, but that of VWF:CBA was more consistent. The difference was more evident when values were expressed as a ratio, obtained by normalizing VWF:CBA and VWF:RCo with the VWF antigen value; the ratio for VWF:CBA was always below 0.2, while that for VWF:RCo was greater than 0.4, and in no patient was the VWF:CBA value higher than VWF:RCo. In contrast, in type 1 VWD, the decrease in VWF:CBA was similar to that seen in VWF:RCo with the ratios always within the normal range. To better investigate the relationship between VWF:CBA and VWF:RCo, and the representation of large/intermediate VWF multimers, to which both tests are sensitive, 1-deamino-cys-8-D-arginine-vasopressin (DDAVP) was infused in type 2A and 2B VWD patients. The differences between the two tests were even more evident after DDAVP, and in type 2A, even though large multimers were persistently decreased, VWF:RCo was normalized, while VWF:CBA remained defective. These findings clearly indicate that VWF:CBA detects the absence of large and intermediate VWF multimers better than VWF:RCo. Hence, we suggest adding VWF:CBA to the panel of tests employed in the diagnosis of VWD. Moreover, owing to the difficulty in performing VWF:RCo and its low reproducibility, we suggest that, when necessary, VWF:CBA may be substituted for VWF:RCo.

Mapping the glycoprotein Ib-binding site in the von willebrand factor A1 domain

The von Willebrand factor (vWF) mediates platelet adhesion to exposed subendothelium at sites of vascular injury. It does this by forming a bridge between subendothelial collagen and the platelet glycoprotein Ib-IX-V complex (GPIb). The GPIb-binding site within vWF has been localized to the vWF-A1 domain. Based on the crystal structure of the vWF-A1 domain (Emsley, J., Cruz, M., Handin, R., and Liddington, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 10396-10401), we introduced point mutations into 16 candidate residues that might form all or part of the GPIb interaction site. We also introduced two mutations previously reported to impair vWF function yielding a total of 18 mutations. The recombinant vWF-A1 mutant proteins were then expressed in Escherichia coli, and the activity of the purified proteins was assessed by their ability to support flow-dependent platelet adhesion and their ability to inhibit ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination. Six mutations located on the front and upper anterior face of the folded vWF-A1 domain, R524S, G561S, H563T, T594S/E596A, Q604R, and S607R, showed reduced activity in all the assays, and we suggest that these residues form part of the GPIb interaction site. One mutation, G561S, with impaired activity occurs in the naturally occurring variant form of von Willebrand's disease-type 2M underscoring the physiologic relevance of the mutations described here.

Effect of recombinant von Willebrand factor reproducing type 2B or type 2M mutations on shear-induced platelet aggregation

The aim was to better understand the function of von Willebrand factor (vWF) A1 domain in shear-induced platelet aggregation (SIPA), at low (200) and high shear rate (4000 seconds-1) generated by a Couette viscometer. We report on 9 fully multimerized recombinant vWFs (rvWFs) expressing type 2M or type 2B von Willebrand disease (vWD) mutations, characterized respectively by a decreased or increased binding of vWF to GPIb in the presence of ristocetin. We expressed 4 type 2M (-G561A, -E596K, -R611H, and -I662F) and 5 type 2B (rvWF-M540MM, -V551F, -V553M, -R578Q, and -L697V). SIPA was strongly impaired in all type 2M rvWFs at 200 and 4000 seconds-1. Decreased aggregation was correlated with ristocetin binding to platelets. In contrast, a distinct effect of botrocetin was observed, since type 2M rvWFs (-G561A, -E596K, and -I662F) were able to bind to platelets to the same extent as wild type rvWF (rvWF-WT). Interestingly, SIPA at 200 and 4000 seconds-1 confirmed the gain-of-function phenotype of the 5 type 2B rvWFs. Our data indicated a consistent increase of SIPA at both low and high shear rates, reaching 95% of total platelets, whereas SIPA did not exceed 40% in the presence of rvWF-WT. Aggregation was completely inhibited by monoclonal antibody 6D1 directed to GPIb, underlining the importance of vWF-GPIb interaction in type 2B rvWF. Impaired SIPA of type 2M rvWF could account for the hemorrhagic syndrome observed in type 2M vWD. Increased SIPA of type 2B rvWF could be responsible for unstable aggregates and explain the fluctuant thrombocytopenia of type 2B vWD.

Effect of recombinant von Willebrand factor reproducing type 2B or type 2M mutations on shear-induced platelet aggregation

The aim was to better understand the function of von Willebrand factor (vWF) A1 domain in shear-induced platelet aggregation (SIPA), at low (200) and high shear rate (4000 seconds-1) generated by a Couette viscometer. We report on 9 fully multimerized recombinant vWFs (rvWFs) expressing type 2M or type 2B von Willebrand disease (vWD) mutations, characterized respectively by a decreased or increased binding of vWF to GPIb in the presence of ristocetin. We expressed 4 type 2M (-G561A, -E596K, -R611H, and -I662F) and 5 type 2B (rvWF-M540MM, -V551F, -V553M, -R578Q, and -L697V). SIPA was strongly impaired in all type 2M rvWFs at 200 and 4000 seconds-1. Decreased aggregation was correlated with ristocetin binding to platelets. In contrast, a distinct effect of botrocetin was observed, since type 2M rvWFs (-G561A, -E596K, and -I662F) were able to bind to platelets to the same extent as wild type rvWF (rvWF-WT). Interestingly, SIPA at 200 and 4000 seconds-1 confirmed the gain-of-function phenotype of the 5 type 2B rvWFs. Our data indicated a consistent increase of SIPA at both low and high shear rates, reaching 95% of total platelets, whereas SIPA did not exceed 40% in the presence of rvWF-WT. Aggregation was completely inhibited by monoclonal antibody 6D1 directed to GPIb, underlining the importance of vWF-GPIb interaction in type 2B rvWF. Impaired SIPA of type 2M rvWF could account for the hemorrhagic syndrome observed in type 2M vWD. Increased SIPA of type 2B rvWF could be responsible for unstable aggregates and explain the fluctuant thrombocytopenia of type 2B vWD.

Modeling and functional analysis of the interaction between von Willebrand factor A1 domain and glycoprotein Ibalpha

Binding of the von Willebrand factor (vWF) A1 domain to the glycoprotein (GP) Ib-IX-V complex mediates platelet adhesion to reactive substrates under high shear stress conditions, a key event in hemostasis and thrombosis. We have now used the known three-dimensional structure of the A1 domain to model the interaction with the GP Ibalpha sequence 271-279, which has previously been implicated in ligand binding. Docking procedures suggested that A1 domain residues in strand beta3 and preceding loop (residues 559-566) as well as in helix alpha3 (residues 594-603) interact with Asp residues 272, 274, 277 and sulfated Tyr residues 278 and 279 in GP Ibalpha. To verify this model, 14 mutant A1 domain fragments containing single or multiple side chain substitutions were tested for their ability to mediate platelet adhesion under flow. Each of the vWF residues Tyr(565), Glu(596), and Lys(599) proved to be strictly required for A1 domain function, which, in agreement with previous findings, was also dependent on Gly(561). Moreover, an accessory functional role was apparent for a group of positively charged residues, including Arg at positions 629, 632, 636 and Lys at positions 643 and 645, possibly acting in concert. There was, however, no evidence from the model that these residues directly participate in forming the complex with GP Ibalpha. These results provide a partial model of the vWF-GP Ibalpha interaction linked to the manifestation of functional activity in platelet adhesion.

Targeting of liposomes carrying recombinant fragments of platelet membrane glycoprotein Ibalpha to immobilized von Willebrand factor under flow conditions

Liposomes with covalently bound recombinant fragments of platelet membrane glycoprotein Ibalpha that retain the von Willebrand factor (vWf)-binding function (rGPIbalpha-liposomes) were prepared. Their interactions with an immobilized vWf surface under flow conditions were evaluated with a recirculating flow chamber, mounted on an epifluorescence microscope, which allows real-time visualization of fluorescence-labeled liposomes interacting with the surface. The interaction of rGPIbalpha-liposomes with the vWf surface was directly related to shear rate. At high densities of rGPIbalpha and vWf, rGPIbalpha-liposomes establishing contact with the vWf surface exhibited continuous displacement with decreased velocity relative to the hydrodynamic flow, depending on receptor density and matrix concentration. At lower densities of rGPIbalpha and vWf, rGPIbalpha-liposomes stopped only transiently, in the millisecond range, on the surface. This is the first study to demonstrate that the targeting of rGPIbalpha-liposomes is specific to the vWf surface under flow conditions.

Localization of von willebrand factor-binding sites for platelet glycoprotein Ib and botrocetin by charged-to-alanine scanning mutagenesis

At sites of vascular injury, von Willebrand factor (VWF) mediates platelet adhesion through binding to platelet glycoprotein Ib (GPIb). Previous studies identified clusters of charged residues within VWF domain A1 that were involved in binding GPIb or botrocetin. The contribution of 28 specific residues within these clusters was analyzed by mutating single amino acids to alanine. Binding to a panel of six conformation-dependent monoclonal antibodies was decreased by mutations at Asp(514), Asp(520), Arg(552), and Arg(611) (numbered from the N-terminal Ser of the mature processed VWF), suggesting that these residues are necessary for domain A1 folding. Binding of (125)I-botrocetin was decreased by mutations at Arg(629), Arg(632), Arg(636), and Lys(667). Ristocetin-induced and botrocetin-induced binding to GPIb both were decreased by mutations at Lys(599), Arg(629), and Arg(632); among this group the K599A mutant was unique because (125)I-botrocetin binding was normal, suggesting that Lys(599) interacts directly with GPIb. Ristocetin and botrocetin actions on VWF were dissociated readily by mutagenesis. Ristocetin-induced binding to GPIb was reduced selectively by substitutions at positions Lys(534), Arg(571), Lys(572), Glu(596), Glu(613), Arg(616), Glu(626), and Lys(642), whereas botrocetin-induced binding to GPIb was decreased selectively by mutations at Arg(636) and Lys(667). The binding of monoclonal antibody B724 involved Lys(660) and Arg(663), and this antibody inhibits (125)I-botrocetin binding to VWF. The crystal structure of the A1 domain suggests that the botrocetin-binding site overlaps the monoclonal antibody B724 epitope on helix 5 and spans helices 4 and 5. The binding of botrocetin also activates the nearby VWF-binding site for GPIb that involves Lys(599) on helix 3.

Characterization of liposomes carrying von Willebrand factor-binding domain of platelet glycoprotein Ibalpha: a potential substitute for platelet transfusion

Platelet glycoprotein (GP) Ib/IX/V complex is a receptor for von Willebrand factor (vWf), which plays a crucial role in primary hemostasis by mediating platelet adhesion to injured blood vessels. We have expressed in CHO cells a fragment of GPIba that retained a vWf-binding function. The recombinant fragment (rGPIba) was incorporated into liposomes and evaluated their functions in vitro. rGPIba on the liposome surface was detectable by flow cytometric analysis. Addition of vWf and ristocetin caused specific agglutination of rGPIbalpha-liposomes, as evaluated by an aggregometer or a fluorescent microscopy. When ristocetin was added to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) pre-mixed with rhodamine-labeled rGPIbalpha-liposomes, platelets aggregated and rhodamine-fluorescence was strongly positive in the platelet thrombi, suggesting that heterologous aggregation (attachment of liposomes to platelets) occurred. Platelet aggregation in PRP at low platelet concentration (20-80 x 10(6)/ml) was enhanced by rGPIbalpha-liposomes in a dose-dependent manner. Thus, rGPIbalpha-liposomes may accumulate on vWf-exposed subendothelial tissues and enhance platelet function in vivo, supporting hemostasis in thrombocytopenic individuals.

Total inhibition of high shear stress induced platelet aggregation by homodimeric von Willebrand factor A1-loop fragments

Under high shear stress, the binding of von Willebrand factor (VWF) A1-loop domain to platelet glycoprotein (GP) Ib alpha occurs as the earliest event in thrombus formation. Therefore recombinant VWF A1-loop fragments could be of therapeutic use in blocking this interaction as competing ligands. We have prepared three homodimeric VWF A1-loop fragments [315 kD Fr III (a homodimer of amino acid [aa] residues 1-1365 of the subunit), 220 kD Fr (a homodimer of aa residues 1-708 of the subunit), and 116 kD Fr (a homodimer of aa residues 449-728 of the subunit) and two monomeric fragments [39/34 kD Fr (a monomer of aa residues 480/481-718 of the subunit] and His-rVWF465-728 (a monomer of aa residues 465-728 of the subunit)], and assessed their potency as inhibitors of botrocetin-induced VWF binding to GPIb alpha and high shear stress induced platelet aggregation mediated by intact VWE All these fragments completely inhibited botrocetin-induced VWF binding to GPIb alpha at a final concentration of 40-200 microM. The homodimeric A1-loop fragments also totally inhibited high shear stress induced platelet aggregation at a final concentration of 0.45-2.0 microM in the following order: 315 kD Fr > or = 220 kD Fr >> 116 kD Fr. In contrast, the monomeric A1-loop fragments were only partial inhibitors of high shear stress induced platelet aggregation even at a final concentration of 20 microM, and their IC50s were 13-39 times higher than those of the homodimers. These results indicate that the homodimeric structure of the A1-loop fragment is important for optimal molecular interaction with GPIb alpha under high shear stress.

Conformational Changes in the A3 Domain of von Willebrand Factor Modulate the Interaction of the A1 Domain With Platelet Glycoprotein Ib

Bitiscetin has recently been shown to induce von Willebrand factor (vWF)-dependent aggregation of fixed platelets (Hamako J, et al,Biochem Biophys Res Commun 226:273, 1996). We have purified bitiscetin from Bitis arietans venom and investigated the mechanism whereby it promotes a form of vWF that is reactive with platelets. In the presence of bitiscetin, vWF binds to platelets in a dose-dependent and saturable manner. The binding of vWF to platelets involves glycoprotein (GP) Ib because it was totally blocked by monoclonal antibody (MoAb) 6D1 directed towards the vWF-binding site of GPIb. The binding also involves the GPIb-binding site of vWF located on the A1 domain because it was inhibited by MoAb to vWF whose epitopes are within this domain and that block binding of vWF to platelets induced by ristocetin or botrocetin. However, in contrast to ristocetin or botrocetin, the binding site of bitiscetin does not reside within the A1 domain but within the A3 domain of vWF. Thus, among a series of vWF fragments, 125I-bitiscetin only binds to those that overlap the A3 domain, ie, SpIII (amino acid [aa] 1-1365), SpI (aa 911-1365), and rvWF-A3 domain (aa 920-1111). It does not bind to SpII corresponding to the C-terminal part of vWF subunit (aa 1366-2050) nor to the 39/34/kD dispase species (aa 480-718) or T116 (aa 449-728) overlapping the A1 domain. In addition, bitiscetin that does not bind to DeltaA3-rvWF (deleted between aa 910-1113) has no binding site ouside the A3 domain. The localization of the binding site of bitiscetin within the A3 domain was further supported by showing that MoAb to vWF, which are specific for this domain and block the interaction between vWF and collagen, are potent inhibitors of the binding of bitiscetin to vWF and consequently of the bitiscetin-induced binding of vWF to platelets. Thus, our data support the hypothesis that an interaction between the A1 and A3 domains exists that may play a role in the function of vWF by regulating the ability of the A1 domain to bind to platelet GPIb.

Platelet Aggregation Induced by a Monoclonal Antibody to the A1 Domain of von Willebrand Factor

Shear-induced platelet aggregation (SIPA) involves von Willebrand Factor (vWF) binding to platelet glycoprotein (GP)Ib at high shear stress, followed by the activation of αIIbβ3. The purpose of this study was to determine the vWF sequences involved in SIPA by using monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) to vWF known to interfere with its binding to GPIb and to αIIbβ3. Washed platelets were exposed to shear rates between 100 and 4,000 seconds−1 in a rotational viscometer. SIPA was quantitated by flow cytometry as the disappearance of single platelets (DSP) in the sheared sample in the presence of vWF, relative to a control in the absence of shear and vWF. At a shear rate of 4,000 seconds−1, DSP was increased from 5.9% ± 3.5% in the absence of vWF to 32.7% ± 6.3% in the presence of vWF. This increase in SIPA was not associated with an elevation of P-selectin expression. vWF-dependent SIPA was completely abolished by MoAb 6D1 to GPIb and partially inhibited by MoAb 10E5 to αIIbβ3. Three MoAbs to vWF were compared for their effect on SIPA at 4,000 seconds−1 in the presence of vWF: MoAb 328, known to block vWF binding to GPIb in the presence of ristocetin, MoAb 724 blocking vWF binding to GPIb in the presence of botrocetin, and MoAb 9, an inhibitor of vWF binding to αIIbβ3. Similar to the effect of MoAb 6D1, MoAb 328 completely inhibited the effect of vWF, whereas MoAb 9 had a partial inhibitory effect, as MoAb 10E5 did. In contrast, MoAb 724, as well as its F(ab′)2 fragments, promoted shear-dependent platelet aggregation (165% of the DSP value obtained in the absence of MoAb 724), indicating that MoAb 724 was responsible for an enhanced aggregation, which was independent of binding to the platelet Fcγ receptor. In addition, the enhancement of aggregation induced by MoAb 724 was abrogated by MoAb 6D1 or 10E5 to the level of SIPA obtained in the presence of vWF incubated with a control MoAb to vWF. Finally, the activating effect of MoAb 724 was also found under static conditions at ristocetin concentrations too low to induce platelet aggregation. Our results suggested that on binding to a botrocetin-binding site on vWF, MoAb 724 mimics the effect of botrocetin by inducing an active conformation of vWF that is more sensitive to shear stress or to low ristocetin concentration.