On-line electrochemical detection of carbohydrates coupled with the periodate oxidation

New iodine-based electrochemical advanced oxidation system for water disinfection: Are disinfection by-products a concern?

A novel electrochemical Advanced Oxidation System (AOS) has been recently developed for water disinfection where iodide is used to generate active iodine species in-situ. However, the presence of iodide during water disinfection can lead to the formation of iodinated disinfection byproducts (I-DBPs), which have been shown to be more cyto- and genotoxic than their chlorinated and brominated analogs. In this study, the formation of DBPs was assessed in ultrapure water, river water and secondary wastewater effluents treated by the AOS. A comprehensive total organic halogen and target DBP analysis was used that included 25 unregulated DBPs, and the total organic halogen (TOX) quantified as total organic chlorine (TOCl), total organic bromine (TOBr), and total organic iodine (TOI). Ultrapure water disinfection only quantified iodoform (TIM) at a maximum concentration of 0.90 ± 0.05 µg/L. River water results show that TOI increase from 1.3 ± 0.3 µg/L before disinfection (t = 0) to a maximum of 3.5 ± 1.1 µg/L. TIM and bromodiiodomethane (BDIM) were the only targeted iodo-trihalomethanes (I-THMs) that were quantified with a maximum total I-THM concentration of 0.44 µg/L. Secondary wastewater effluent disinfection results show that TOI increased from 1.8 ± 0.3 µg/L (t = 0) to a maximum concentration of 35.3 ± 0.3 µg/L. Iodide and iodate were the main iodinated species exiting the AOS system with a iodine recovery of 94-101%. The results from this study show that the AOS formed low levels of iodinated DBPs in treated water sources that are comparable to the levels found in disinfected drinking water and wastewater.

Sampling, Dilution, and Loading Device-coupled High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method for Successive On-line Analyses of Major Carbohydrate Products in Immobilized Cellulase Hydrolysate of Paper Cellulose

A device with direct sampling, dilution, and sample loading has been utilized to couple a vertically hanging immobilized cellulase bioreactor with a high-performance liquid chromatography system to make a successful on-line analysis of the 3 major carbohydrate products: glucose, xylose, and cellobiose in the cellulase hydrolysate. The coupled analysis system for successive on-line monitoring of the enzymatic hydrolysis of paper cellulose was stable over a period of 96 h. A comparative study involving 4 different quantification methods for the 3 carbohydrates was conducted. The internal standard calibration method with on-line dilution was observed to be the best procedure in terms of accuracy, precision, limit of detection, and systematic error reduction. With this method, the analysis for glucose had 99.9% accuracy, RSD below 2.4%, and a 2.1 ppm detection limit. Matrix matching was found important in the preparation of standard calibration curves with refractive index detection.

Separation and quantitation of fructose-6-phosphate and fructose-1,6-diphosphate by LC-ESI-MS for the evaluation of fructose-1,6-biphosphatase activity

An LC-ESI-MS method was developed for the identification and quantification of fructose-1,6-biphosphate (F1,6BP) and fructose-6-phosphate (F6P), respectively the substrate and the product of the enzymatic reaction catalysed by fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (F1,6BPase). F1,6BPase, expressed predominantly in liver and kidney, is one of the rate-limiting enzymes of hepatic gluconeogenesis and has become a target for the development of new drugs for type 2 diabetes. The two sugar phosphates were separated on a Phenomenex Luna NH2 column (150 mm x 2.0 mm id) using the following mobile phase: 5 mM triethylamine acetate buffer/ACN (80:20) v/v in a linear pH gradient (from pH = 9 to 10 in 15 min) at the flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The detection was performed with an IT mass spectrometer in negative polarity (full scan 100-450 m/z) and in SIM mode on the generated anions at m/z = 339 (F1,6BP) and m/z = 259 (F6P). Under the optimised final conditions, the method was validated for accuracy, specificity, precision (inter- and intradays RSD comprised between 1.0 and 6.3% over the range of concentrations used), linearity (50-400 microM), LODs (0.44 microM) and LOQs (1.47 microM), and the method was applied to F6P determination in the F1,6BPase catalysed hydrolysis of F1,6BP.