Etiology of left bundle branch block. Hemodynamic and angiographic studies

Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block. The effect of interventricular asynchrony

Eighteen patients with isolated left bundle branch block (LBBB) were compared with 10 normal control subjects. Apexcardiograms, phonocardiograms, electrocardiograms, two-dimensional and dual M-mode echocardiograms, and radionuclide ventriculograms (RNV) were performed. There were no differences in the timing of right ventricular events between LBBB and normal subjects; however, striking delays in left ventricular systolic and diastolic events were apparent in the LBBB group. The delay was associated with shortening of left ventricular diastole and resultant increase in the ratio of right to left ventricular diastolic time in LBBB (1.2 +/- 0.08) compared with normal (1.0 +/- 0.06), p less than 0.0001. First heart sound (S1) amplitude, expressed as the ratio S1/S2, was decreased in LBBB compared with normal (0.67 +/- 0.2 compared with 1.34 +/- 0.25, p less than 0.01), in part due to wide separation of the valvular contributors to S1. The abnormal interventricular septal motion in LBBB corresponded to periods of asynchrony in contraction, ejection, end systole, and end diastole between right and left ventricles. Radionuclide ventriculograms revealed decreased regional ejection fraction of the septum in LBBB (40 +/- 16%) compared with 67 +/- 7% in normal subjects (p less than 0.001), while the apical and lateral regional ejection fractions were similar in the two groups. This loss of septal contribution resulted in a reduction in global ejection fraction in LBBB compared to normals (54 +/- 7% compared with 62 +/- 5%, p less than 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Left bundle branch block: a predictor of poor left ventricular function in coronary artery disease

Clinical, coronary arteriographic, and hemodynamic studies were performed in 55 patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and coronary artery disease and were compared with 110 patients consecutively matched for age and sex with ischemic heart disease but without LBBB. No significant differences were found in duration of symptoms or frequency of prior myocardial infarction, hypertension, or diabetes mellitus; however, the LBBB patients had a significantly (p less than 0.001) higher frequency of congestive heart failure (38.2% vs 11.8%) and cardiomegaly (63.6% vs 25.5%). An evaluation of severity of the coronary disease on the basis of subtotal vs total obstructive lesions, number of vessels involved, total coronary score, and individual coronary arteries involved revealed no significant differences between the groups. The LBBB patients had significantly (p less than 0.001) greater impairment of left ventricular function as reflected by the end-diastolic volume (107 +/- 43 vs 79 +/- 30 ml/m2), ejection fraction (0.35 +/- 0.19 vs 0.59 +/- 0.18), and frequency of an abnormal contractile pattern (91% vs 61%). Evaluating the LBBB patients on the basis of the QRS width and axis revealed no significant intragroup differences in clinical profile, severity of coronary disease, or left ventricular dysfunction. A prolonged PR interval (greater than or equal to 0.20 second) was associated with more severe coronary artery disease and an enlarged heart. This study indicates that coronary artery disease associated with LBBB identifies patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

The pathologic correlates of the electrocardiogram: complete left bundle branch block

To assess whether gross pathologic differences exist between hearts with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left-axis deviation (LAXD) and those with LBBB and a normal frontal plane axis, we examined 70 hearts with LBBB in a series of 1410 sequential dissections (5%). Thirty-two hearts had LAXD and 34 had normal axes on the correlative ECG. Left ventricular enlargement occurred frequently (93%). No significant differences were found in age distribution, left ventricular weight, coronary anatomy or infarct location. Quantitative analysis revealed larger inferoposterolateral and apical infarcts in hearts with LBBB and LAXD (p less than 0.01). The accuracy of various electrocardiographic signs of left ventricular enlargement and myocardial infarction in the presence of LBBB was assessed. Voltage criteria and QRS duration poorly define anatomic chamber enlargement. Anterior infarction is suggested by a q or pathological Q wave in lead I, a q wave in leads I, V5 and V6, or notched S waves in V3 or V4. Pathologic q waves or ST shifts in the inferior leads have high diagnostic specificity but low sensitivity for inferior infarction.