Animated images of cardiac membrane voltage during defibrillation

A comparison of chronaxies for ventricular fibrillation induction, defibrillation, and cardiac stimulation: unexpected findings and their implications

INTRODUCTION

A low-energy (<or= 4 J) cardioversion shock (LEC) either terminates reentrant ventricular tachycardia (VT) or accelerates it to ventricular fibrillation (VF). Optimization of the duration and amplitude of LEC shocks could improve the success rate of VT termination without VF induction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In order to learn how LEC shocks may be optimized, we used an animal model to compare the strength-duration curve for VF induction and the strength-duration curve for cardiac stimulation via the shock coil. Conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads were implanted in 12 narcotized pigs from 20 kg to 25 kg in weight. Stimulation, VF induction, and defibrillation pulses were delivered by custom-designed stimulators at preset pulse durations and amplitudes. The corresponding hyperbolic strength-duration curves were constructed using the least-squares fit method and averaged for all the animals. The mean chronaxie for stimulation via the shock coil of 0.23 ms was significantly shorter than both defibrillation (4.8 ms) and VF induction (3.1 ms) chronaxie values. At a shock duration of 0.3 ms or less, the mean VF-induction threshold amplitude exceeded 300 V.

CONCLUSION

It may be reasonable to study whether LEC pulses from 0.25 ms to 0.30 ms in duration and up to 250 V in amplitude would increase therapeutic yield in VT termination without VF induction in humans. Contrary to the current belief, the discrepancy between defibrillation and stimulation chronaxie is not caused by different electrode size. We postulate that the time constant of the fast sodium channel reactivation may be the underlying reason.

Optical transmembrane potential recordings during intracardiac defibrillation-strength shocks

BACKGROUND

The prolongation of the action potential after defibrillation-strength shocks is believed to be a critical component of defibrillation. The response of the transmembrane potential to the shock may affect this prolongation. We studied the effects of an intracardiac shock on the transmembrane potential and action potential duration at multiple sites on the epicardium using a voltage-sensitive dye and optical mapping system.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A laser scanner recorded optical action potentials with voltage-sensitive dye at 63 spots on both the left and right ventricles of six isolated, perfused rabbit hearts. Hearts were paced with epicardial point stimulation followed by the delivery of a 2 A and 20 ms rectangular waveform shock during the relative refractory period. The shock was given between right atrial and right ventricular electrodes. Of 621 total spots analyzed, 241 spots hyperpolarized and 76 spots depolarized with a right ventricular anode, whereas 159 spots hyperpolarized and 145 spots depolarized with a right ventricular cathode (P < 0.05). Both hyperpolarized and depolarized spots exhibited prolonged action potential duration, although prolongation was greater with depolarizing responses (16.7 +/- 9 ms vs. 13.3 +/- 13.4 ms, p<0.001). Hyperpolarized and depolarized spots were not randomly distributed, but clustered into regions. The size of the hyperpolarized regions was larger than the depolarized regions with RV anodal stimulation (27 +/- 20 spots/hyperpolarized region vs. 8.5 +/- 9 spots/depolarized region, p < 0.03) but not with RV cathodal stimulation. With reversal of electrode polarity, spots hyperpolarized near the shocking electrodes frequently did not reverse polarization but remained hyperpolarized.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinct regions of either polarization occur during intracardiac defibrillation-strength shocks. Although hyperpolarizing membrane responses were observed more often than depolarizing responses, depolarizing membrane polarization resulted in greater action potential prolongation. The absence of sign change in polarization in some regions with shocks of opposite polarities suggests that nonlinear intrinsic membrane properties are operative during strong electrical stimulation.

Effects of electroporation on the transmembrane potential distribution in a two-dimensional bidomain model of cardiac tissue

INTRODUCTION

Defibrillation shocks, when delivered through internal electrodes, establish transmembrane potentials (Vm) large enough to electroporate the membrane of cardiac cells. The effects of such shocks on the transmembrane potential distribution are investigated in a two-dimensional rectangular sheet of cardiac muscle modeled as a bidomain with unequal anisotropy ratios.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The membrane is represented by a capacitance Cm, a leakage conductance g(l) and a variable electroporation conductance G, whose rate of growth depends exponentially on the square of Vm. The stimulating current Io, 0.05-20 A/m, is delivered through a pair of electrodes placed 2 cm apart for stimulation along fibers and 1 cm apart for stimulation across fibers. Computer simulations reveal three categories of response to Io: (1) Weak Io, below 0.2 A/m, cause essentially no electroporation, and Vm increases proportionally to Io. (2) Strong Io, between 0.2 and 2.5 A/m, electroporate tissue under the physical electrode. Vm is no longer proportional to Io; in the electroporated region, the growth of Vm is halted and in the region of reversed polarity (virtual electrode), the growth of Vm is accelerated. (3) Very strong Io, above 2.5 A/m, electroporate tissue under the physical and the virtual electrodes. The growth of Vm in all electroporated regions is halted, and a further increase of Io increases both the extent of the electroporated regions and the electroporation conductance G.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that electroporation of the cardiac membrane plays an important role in the distribution of Vm induced by defibrillation strength shocks.